United States Congressional Joint Special Committee on Conditions of Indian Tribes

Last updated

The Joint Special Committee on Conditions of Indian Tribes was formed on March 3, 1865, by resolution of both houses of U.S. Congress for the purpose of "directing an inquiry into the condition of the Indian tribes and their treatment by the civil and military authorities of the United States". [1] The Senate resolution was sponsored by James Rood Doolittle [2] [3] who was then the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs. He became the Chairman of the new Joint Special Committee, leading it to be called the "Doolittle Committee." [4]

Contents

The Committee reported its findings to the Senate on January 26, 1867. It was ordered that the report be printed, [5] and it was eventually published together with a lengthy Appendix containing much of the testimony collected during the investigation. [1]

Background

The push for a thorough investigation of the condition and treatment of Indigenous Peoples throughout the country arose amid reports of government corruption following the 1864 Sand Creek Massacre (also known as the Chivington Massacre) in which an estimated 150–500 friendly Cheyenne and Arapaho people were murdered in their sleep by the U.S. Army in Colorado Territory. [2] [4] Several other investigations were spawned by this massacre, including one in 1865 by the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, which criticized the Indian Bureau and the Interior Department under which the Committee was situated. [2] Public calls emerged for the Indian Bureau to be moved back under the War Department, [6] from which it had been transferred to the Interior Department when it was created in 1849.

Methods

The Doolittle Committee consisted of seven committee members, three of whom were Senators and four of whom were House Representatives. The members divided U.S. States and Territories into three groups, forming subcommittees to investigate each area. [1]

MembersRegions
Sen. James Rood Doolittle (WI) – Chairman

Sen. Lafayette Sabine Foster (CT) – Vice President

Rep. Lewis Winans Ross (IL)

 Kansas

Indian Territory

Colorado (territory)

New Mexico (territory)

Utah (territory)

Sen. James Willis Nesmith (OR)

Rep. William Higby (CA)

 California

Oregon

Nevada

Washington (territory)

Idaho (territory)

Montana (territory)

Rep. William Windom (MN)

Rep. Asahel Wheeler Hubbard (IA)

 Minnesota

Nebraska (territory)

Dakota (territory)

Upper Montana (territory)

The committee pursued their investigations in a number of ways. They first took sworn testimony from Colorado officials connected to the Sand Creek Massacre during hearings in Washington, D.C., on March 7–8, 1865. [2] Next, they traveled to many of the areas in question to take testimony in person from a variety of stakeholders, including military personnel, Indian Agents and Superintendents, clergymen, members of the tribes themselves, and non-Indigenous civilian settlers. In August 1865, Senators Doolittle and Foster, and Representative Ross, visited Fort Lyon to confer with the tribes there regarding the Sand Creek Massacre. [7]

They also sought testimony about U.S.-Native American relations in writing through letters to regional authorities and other knowledgeable people in areas where they were unable to visit. In addition to general requests for information and testimony, the committee compiled a list of 23 questions that Senator Doolittle sent out by means of a circular. Dated May 10, 1865, it asked recipients to respond in writing by September 1, 1865. [1]

The committee members completed their field investigations in the fall of 1865. In March 1866, the subcommittees' reports and some of the relevant documentation were printed by the Government Printing Office. The document totaled 532 pages and would later become the final report's Appendix. However, the report would not be completed until the following January, after the committee came under pressure by the media who had begun publishing controversial excerpts from the leaked Appendix. [2]

Report

Senator Doolittle finally completed the 10-page report and read it in the Senate, which ordered it to be printed, on January 26, 1867. [5] It was eventually published together with the Appendix as Condition of the Indian Tribes: Report of the Joint Special Committee, Appointed under Joint Resolution of March 3, 1865: With an Appendix. As Senator Doolittle spearheaded the committee, its report came to be known as the "Doolittle Report."

Conclusions

The report outlines five main conclusions of the committee:

  1. Except in the Indian Territories, Indigenous populations were declining rapidly at the time. Causes of Indigenous population decline included disease, wars, loss of land area and the encroachment of white populations leading to reduced food supply in the form of game, and mistreatment by U.S. authorities.
  2. Wars by white people against Indigenous tribes were destructive and often became wars "of extermination," with the authors noting the frequency with which Indigenous people were "slaughtered indiscriminately". The committee members determined that a large majority of the conflicts with Indigenous tribes were directly caused by "lawless white men".
  3. The effects of human migration, due to settlers seeking gold and land, and the construction Transcontinental Railroad lines, had negative impacts on the availability of game. Bison were specifically affected, which was a principle food source for Indigenous Peoples of the Great Plains. The inability of authorities to enforce laws in sparsely populated areas also led to conflicts between Indigenous groups and white settlers, who ignored territorial boundaries in their search for gold or land on which to settle.
  4. Recommendation that the Indian Bureau should remain as part of the Department of the Interior, rather than being moved back under the War Department.
  5. Recommendation to pass a pending Senate bill, which would subdivide the states and territories overseen by the Indian Bureau into five districts and create five inspection boards to oversee them.

Aftermath

A few days after the report was read in the Senate, the House Military Committee signaled that they would support a bill to move the Indian Bureau back under the War Department. [8] When the bill came to the Senate the following month, Senator Doolittle vehemently opposed it. He argued that it would be better policy in both fiscal and humanitarian terms to move forward with Boards of Inspection to ease relations between the U.S. Government and Indigenous tribes, rather than to continue warring with them. [9]

While Senator Doolittle's proposed legislation was not successful, the committee's report brought to light the corruption in the Indian Bureau [4] as well as the poor treatment of Native Americans by the U.S. military and civilians and its impact on their populations. The investigation was significant in shifting the public debate about Native American affairs toward reform. [3] [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sand Creek massacre</span> 1864 killing of Cheyenne and Arapaho people by US troops during the American Indian Wars

The Sand Creek massacre was a massacre of Cheyenne and Arapaho people by the U.S. Army in the American Indian Wars that occurred on November 29, 1864, when a 675-man force of the Third Colorado Cavalry under the command of U.S. Volunteers Colonel John Chivington attacked and destroyed a village of Cheyenne and Arapaho people in southeastern Colorado Territory, killing and mutilating an estimated 70 to over 600 Native American people. Chivington claimed 500 to 600 warriors were killed. However, most sources estimate around 150 people were killed, about two-thirds of whom were women and children. The location has been designated the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site and is administered by the National Park Service. The massacre is considered part of a series of events known as the Colorado Wars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Chivington</span> 19th-century American pastor and soldier

John Milton Chivington was a Methodist pastor and Mason who served as a colonel in the United States Volunteers during the New Mexico Campaign of the American Civil War. He led a rear action against a Confederate supply train in the Battle of Glorieta Pass that had the effect of ending the Confederacy's campaigns in the Western states, and was then appointed a colonel of cavalry during the Colorado War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colorado Territory</span> Historic region of the US, 1861 to 1876

The Territory of Colorado was an organized incorporated territory of the United States that existed from February 28, 1861, until August 1, 1876, when it was admitted to the Union as the 38th State of Colorado.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bureau of Indian Affairs</span> US government agency

The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), also known as Indian Affairs (IA), is a United States federal agency within the Department of the Interior. It is responsible for implementing federal laws and policies related to Native Americans and Alaska Natives, and administering and managing over 55,700,000 acres (225,000 km2) of reservations held in trust by the U.S. federal government for indigenous tribes. It renders services to roughly 2 million indigenous Americans across 574 federally recognized tribes. The BIA is governed by a director and overseen by the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, who answers to the Secretary of the Interior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zachariah Chandler</span> American businessman and politician

Zachariah Chandler was an American businessman, politician, and one of the founders of the Republican Party, whose radical wing he dominated as a lifelong abolitionist. He was mayor of Detroit, a four-term senator from the state of Michigan, and Secretary of the Interior under President Ulysses S. Grant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Senate Committee on Indian Affairs</span> Standing committee of the United States Senate

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs is a committee of the United States Senate charged with oversight in matters related to the American Indian, Native Hawaiian, and Alaska Native peoples. A Committee on Indian Affairs existed from 1820 to 1947, after which it was folded into the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. A new Native Affairs Committee was created in 1977, initially as a select committee, as a result of the detachment of indigenous affairs from the new Committee on Energy and National Resources, which had succeeded the old Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. The committee was initially intended to be temporary, but was made permanent in 1984. The committee tends to include senators from Western and Plains states, who have more Native American constituents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry M. Teller</span> American politician (1830–1914)

Henry Moore Teller was an American politician from Colorado, serving as a U.S. senator between 1876–1882 and 1885–1909, also serving as Secretary of the Interior between 1882 and 1885. He strongly opposed the Dawes Act, intended to break up communal Native American lands and force assimilation of the people, accurately stating that it was directed at forcing the Indians to give up their land so that it could be sold to white settlers. Among his most prominent achievements was authoring the Teller Amendment which definitively stated that, following the Spanish–American War, the United States would not annex Cuba, rather that the purpose of their involvement would be to help it gain independence from Spain.

The Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War was a United States congressional committee started on December 9, 1861, and was dismissed in May 1865. The committee investigated the progress of the American Civil War against the Confederacy. Meetings were held in secret, but reports were issued from time to time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Congressional Joint Committee on Reconstruction</span>

The Joint Committee on Reconstruction, also known as the Joint Committee of Fifteen, was a joint committee of the 39th United States Congress that played a major role in Reconstruction in the wake of the American Civil War. It was created to "inquire into the condition of the States which formed the so-called Confederate States of America, and report whether they, or any of them, are entitled to be represented in either house of Congress.”‪

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James R. Doolittle</span> 19th century American politician

James Rood Doolittle Sr. was an American lawyer, politician, and Wisconsin pioneer. He represented Wisconsin for 12 years as a United States senator, from March 4, 1857, to March 4, 1869. During his years in the Senate, he was a Republican and a strong supporter of Abraham Lincoln's administration during the American Civil War. He was chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee from 1861 to 1867. Later in life he became a member of the Democratic Party and made an unsuccessful run for governor of Wisconsin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">39th United States Congress</span> Legislative branch of the U.S. federal government from March 4, 1865 to March 4, 1867

The 39th United States Congress was a meeting of the legislative branch of the United States federal government, consisting of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. It met in Washington, D.C., from March 4, 1865, to March 4, 1867, during Abraham Lincoln's final month as president, and the first two years of the administration of his successor, Andrew Johnson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timothy O. Howe</span> American lawyer, judge, and politician.

Timothy Otis Howe was an American lawyer, jurist, Republican politician, and Wisconsin pioneer. He was a United States senator for three terms, representing the state of Wisconsin from March 4, 1861, to March 3, 1879. He later served as the 30th U.S. Postmaster General under President Chester A. Arthur, from 1881 until his death in 1883. Earlier in his career, he was a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, at the time that the Wisconsin Supreme Court was simply a panel of the state's circuit court judges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John B. Henderson</span> American politician

John Brooks Henderson was an American attorney and politician who represented Missouri in the United States Senate from 1862 to 1869.

There have been several Doolittle Reports:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles R. Gill</span> 19th century American politician, Civil War Union officer

Charles Rice Gill was an American lawyer, politician, and Union Army officer in the American Civil War. He was the 9th Attorney General of Wisconsin and represented northern Jefferson County in the Wisconsin State Senate for the 1860 and 1861 sessions. He also briefly served as U.S. Commissioner of Pensions under President Ulysses S. Grant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson</span> 1868 U.S. Senate trial

The impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson, 17th president of the United States, was held in the United States Senate and concluded with acquittal on three of eleven charges before adjourning sine die without a verdict on the remaining charges. It was the first impeachment trial of a U.S. president and was the sixth federal impeachment trial in U.S. history. The trial began March 5, 1868, and adjourned on May 26.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Congressional Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack</span>

The Joint Committee on the Investigation of the Pearl Harbor Attack, also known as The Pearl Harbor Committee, was a committee of members of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives formed during the 79th United States Congress after World War II to investigate the causes of the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor, and possible preventive measures against future attacks. The resolution for the formation of this committee passed in the Senate on September 6, 1945, and in the House on September 11, 1945. The final report of the committee issued on June 20, 1946.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Efforts to impeach Andrew Johnson</span> American Congressional endeavors to impeach Andrew Johnson

During his presidency, Andrew Johnson, the 17th president of the United States, saw multiple efforts during his presidency to impeach him, culminating in his formal impeachment on February 24, 1868, which was followed by a Senate impeachment trial in which he was acquitted by one vote.

The first impeachment inquiry against Andrew Johnson was launched by a vote of the United States House of Representatives on January 7, 1867, to investigate the potential impeachment of the President of the United States, Andrew Johnson. It was run by the House Committee on the Judiciary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of the impeachment of Andrew Johnson</span>

Andrew Johnson became the first president of the United States to be impeached by the United States House of Representatives on February 24, 1868 after he acted to dismiss Edwin Stanton as secretary of war in disregard for the Tenure of Office Act.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "Report of the Joint Special Committee, appointed under joint resolution of March 3, 1865. with an appendix". American Indian and Alaskan Native Documents in the Congressional Serial Set: 1817–1899. 1867-01-26.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Kelsey, Harry (1975). "The Doolittle Report of 1867: Its Preparation and Shortcomings". Arizona and the West. 17 (2): 107–120. ISSN   0004-1408. JSTOR   40168425.
  3. 1 2 Fixico, Donald L. (2007-12-12). Treaties with American Indians: An Encyclopedia of Rights, Conflicts, and Sovereignty [3 volumes]: An Encyclopedia of Rights, Conflicts, and Sovereignty. ABC-CLIO. p. 800. ISBN   978-1-57607-881-5.
  4. 1 2 3 Oman, Kerry (2002-01-01). "The Beginning Of The End: The Indian Peace Commission Of 1867~1868". Great Plains Quarterly. 22 (1. Winter 2002): 35–51.
  5. 1 2 "Washington. Special Dispatches to the New-York Times. Saturday, Jan. 26". New York Times. January 27, 1867. Retrieved June 23, 2020.
  6. ↑ "The Indian Massacre: Particulars of the Tragedy at Fort Phil Kearney – Bad Management of Indian Affairs – Inefficient Officers. Friday, Jan. 4, 1867". New York Times. January 19, 1867. Retrieved June 23, 2020.
  7. ↑ "Indian Affairs". New York Times. August 9, 1865. Retrieved June 23, 2020.
  8. ↑ "Special Dispatches to the New-York Times. Washington, Monday, Jan. 28. Transfer of the Indian Bureau". New York Times. January 29, 1867. Retrieved June 23, 2020.
  9. ↑ "Thirty-Ninth Congress. Second Session. Senate. Washington, Friday, Feb. 22. Transfer of the Indian Bureau". New York Times. February 23, 1867. Retrieved June 23, 2020.
  10. ↑ Chaput, Donald (1972). "Generals, Indian Agents, Politicians: The Doolittle Survey of 1865". The Western Historical Quarterly. 3 (3): 269–282. doi:10.2307/967424. ISSN   0043-3810. JSTOR   967424.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.