Warming center

Last updated

Visitors to a warming center Visit to Enfield shelter & warming center (6314807461).jpg
Visitors to a warming center

A warming center (also a heat bank [1] or warm bank [2] ) is a short-term emergency shelter that operates when temperatures or a combination of precipitation, wind chill, wind and temperature become dangerously inclement. Their paramount purpose is the prevention of death and injury from exposure to the elements. This may include acute trauma from falling objects such as trees, or injury to extremities due to frostbite. A more prevalent emergency which warming centers seek to prevent is hypothermia, the risk for which is aggravated by factors such as age, alcohol consumption, and homelessness.

Contents

Purpose

Risk factors include age, medical conditions, and homeless status. Hypothermia. HypothermiaAge.jpg
Risk factors include age, medical conditions, and homeless status. Hypothermia .

Thus warming centers are frequently directed to the circumstances of persons who are unsheltered due to a personal state of homelessness and who, for one reason or another, do not utilize existing homeless shelters. In other circumstances, centers serve stranded motorists [3] or, during cold-weather power outages, homeowners and tenants.

In some cases, when cold snaps threaten wildlife, they are created and operated to protect endangered wild animals. Cold blooded animals such as turtles are particularly vulnerable as are their hatchlings. [4] Emergency shelters vary in policy on pets, companions, or domesticated animals, [5] although service animals may be admitted even when other animals are prohibited. [6] During large scale disasters, there are frequently separate locations including a safe place for horses. [ citation needed ]

Location of warming centers

Existing shelters

Churches, like this one in the United States, are frequently used as warming centers. Warming center.jpg
Churches, like this one in the United States, are frequently used as warming centers.

While they are in some cases directly affiliated with existing homeless shelter operations, warming centers are more frequently housed in different locations.[ citation needed ] Due to zoning, special use permit, and fire code restrictions, homeless shelters and day centers serving homeless populations are often legally constrained from exceeding authorized capacity. Not infrequently, existing shelters are engaged with ongoing negotiations with neighbors who in some cases take a NIMBY (not in my backyard) attitude toward existing operations. Any increase in capacity can become politicized, despite the exigencies of spikes in cold temperature days, particularly when cold or rainy weather is routine.[ citation needed ]

Thus, they need to secure alternative sites unless restrictions are waived due to extreme or otherwise unusual weather. Such waivers may be either on a one-time basis, or pursuant to memorandum of understanding (MOUs) with relevant agencies; however, existing shelter sites are typically at the highest level of use compatible with neighborhood character and the political balance of power.[ citation needed ] Few warming center sites appear to be utilizing the same building as routine homeless shelter operations, and the preponderance of them do situate in alternative sites.[ citation needed ]

Alternative sites

When not using existing shelters under MOUs or other legal instruments relaxing ordinary legal restrictions, venues of operation frequently involve coalitions of non-profit entities which own or operate suitable real estate. These include churches and community organizations but also may involve special-purpose institutional real estate such as national guard armories. [7]

Some municipalities designate existing public facilities as warming centers during extreme cold weather. Examples include senior centers, public libraries, and police stations. [6]

Determination to activate warming centers

Warming centers are generally [8] opened for only a few days at a time based on the conditions of the area, although some [9] are open for specific portion of the year when weather conditions are adverse. [10] [11]

The city of Chicago opens its shelters from December 1 to March 1 each year, as well as any other times the temperature drops below freezing. [12]

The city of Portland, Oregon, uses a more complex formula to determine when to open shelters; factors include wet or dry conditions, the night's predicted low, the three-day trend of lows, sustained wind speed, and whether snow is on the ground or predicted to fall. [13]

Activation is generally a centralized decision based upon what is termed either an algorithm, or, in other jurisdictions, an activation trigger. [14] Lane County, Oregon utilizes an elaborate system of tiered readiness levels in collaboration with the American Red Cross. [15] They refer to these levels as their "alert status", ranging from fair weather outlook status to standby, watch and finally activate. [15]

Operations

Outreach to vulnerable persons

Once a center has been sited, staffed and the volunteer phone tree has been activated, it is required to connect with the populations it intends to reach and persuade them to come in. A significant population is resistant to interaction with perceived "authorities" and others may not have sufficient contact with the system of care to be adequately aware of their options. A recent trend promoted by organizations such as Common Ground is to piggyback vulnerability indexes and site data onto HUD-mandated enumeration studies. One of the benefits hoped for with regard to those projects is that there will be better opportunities to promote the warming center option to vulnerable populations.

Centers often coordinate with outside programs. For communication of the availability of open centers, many coordinate with the Federally mandated 2-1-1 or the 3-1-1 phone information system. [16] Street newspapers are generally published weekly or less frequently, which makes them useful only for general information such as contact numbers and locations.

For transportation to centers, some offer free transportation, [17] in some cases for persons being released from jail into conditions of inclement weather. [18] In blizzard conditions, snowmobile enthusiasts have been mobilized. [19]

Warming centers in service

Once opened and populated, they typically offer only the most bare-bones of service: a cot and perhaps a bowl of hot soup. They are generally operated with one or more experienced professional staff person, due to the difficulties which untrained volunteers might encounter in dealing with the clientele. Often, users of warming centers are persons who are not participating in routine homeless shelter services due to disciplinary exclusions or non-compliance with behavioral policies. In order to distinguish mere oddness from behavioral disorders which might disrupt the ability of other persons to obtain service, professional staff is the preferred alternative to all-volunteer personnel. [20] [21] Others utilizing Warming Centers are persons who are not in the shelter system for an array of reasons not necessarily associated with pathology. They may personally be in transit but not prepared financially or otherwise to contend with unanticipated weather conditions. Others may be locals who are eligible for but decline to stay in shelters due to objections to policies and procedures. [22]

Historic and current role in society

Warming centers frequently are opened as a response to the occurrence of hospitalizations dues to hypothermia when unsheltered persons are discovered in extreme exposure-related trauma or mortality.

They seem to go back as far as 1945, when used in Berlin at the conclusion of World War II. Clothing and blankets were allowed for under the air lift plans and an extensive plan was developed for public "warming centers." [23]

In more recent times, U.S. warming centers are proliferating as a means to serve the unsheltered homeless during temperature and rainfall spikes. Such cohorts may not have access to year-round homeless shelters due to supply and demand imbalance, or may simply be uninterested in nightly access during mild weather, but some observers note that others may be unable to comply with conditions for use. According to Detroit socialist writer Naomi Spencer, they serve also as "a last resort for homeless people to find respite from the cold, especially those with drug addictions, mental illness, or criminal backgrounds, who may not meet requirements imposed by some homeless shelters or religious charity operations." [24] Others, including straight edge, DIY, or anarchist-identified persons who may choose to live "off-the-grid", without facing exclusion from quotidian shelters due to sobriety issues. [25]

Others simply find shelters too regimented, too much like jail: newspaperman Mike Hendricks quotes a former resident of an unauthorized homeless encampment named Crow, who said that "some guys would sooner do what they want and not be told what to do." [26]

Tom Brown's Field Guide to City and Suburban Survival contains chapters on shelters and heating. [27] He also outlines means of creating a personal warming center by using ATM access cards. [27] His recommendations have been circulated by Chicago's urban community activist Chrisdian Wittenburg including instructions on building a makeshift stove and a plethora of collaborative cultural projects.[ citation needed ]

Controversy

Perception of the importance and priority of warming centers varies. At one extreme, their under-utilization or minimal level of service is characterized as unfriendly. During the blizzard of February 2011, the City of Ottawa, Illinois did not have established warming centers, and an ad hoc facility was established. Users were required to bring their own food and blankets, drawing fire for the "have-nots...can all freeze to death...here in the friendly city." [28] In Detroit, failure to disburse Community Development Block Grants resulted in a situation where people slept in plastic chairs or "in cold hallways". [29]

At the other end of the continuum, critics have expressed skepticism that the churches and other facilities utilized for warming centers are appropriate and capable of handling the clientele. [30] Another contention is that assisting homeless people "enables" them to continue a lifestyle which is problematic.

But advocates of warming centers have similarly noted that they tend to maintain the status quo by not addressing structural factors, but their emphasis is that too little rather than too much is done to help the needy. Sue Murphy is the administrative director of Interfaith Action of Evanston, Illinois, which has a daytime center for a time slot during which overnight shelters are closed to clients. She states that warmth and snacks "is not nearly enough...what we need is a place where they can go the whole winter. Her concerns are seconded by Sue Loellebach of Connections for the Homeless, who laments the paucity of warm refuge during daylight hours, but rejects that and even extended-stay shelters as inadequate and that they perpetuate the status quo. [31]

See also

Related Research Articles

Lennox, California Census-designated place in California, United States

Lennox is a census-designated place (CDP) in Los Angeles County, California, United States. The population was 22,753 at the 2010 census, down from 22,950 at the 2000 census.

Hypothermia Human body core temperature below 35.0 °C

Hypothermia is defined as a body core temperature below 35.0 °C (95.0 °F) in humans. Symptoms depend on the temperature. In mild hypothermia, there is shivering and mental confusion. In moderate hypothermia, shivering stops and confusion increases. In severe hypothermia, there may be hallucinations and paradoxical undressing, in which a person removes their clothing, as well as an increased risk of the heart stopping.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness in Canada</span> Overview and history of homelessness in Canada

Homelessness in Canada was not a social problem until the 1980s. Canadian government housing policies and programs in place throughout the 1970s were based on a concept of shelter as a basic need or requirement for survival and of the obligation of government and society to provide adequate housing for everyone. Public policies shifted away from rehousing in the 1980s in wealthy Western countries like Canada, which led to a de-housing of households that had previously been housed. By 1987, when the United Nations established the International Year of Shelter for the Homeless (IYSH), homelessness had become a serious social problem in Canada. The report of the major 1987 IYSH conference held in Ottawa said that housing was not a high priority for government, and this was a significant contributor to the homelessness problem. While there was a demand for adequate and affordable housing for low income Canadian families, government funding was not available. In the 1980s a "wider segment of the population" began to experience homelessness for the first time—evident through their use of emergency shelters and soup kitchens. Shelters began to experience overcrowding, and demand for services for the homeless was constantly increasing. A series of cuts were made to national housing programs by the federal government through the mid-1980s and in the 1990s. While Canada's economy was robust, the cuts continued and in some cases accelerated in the 1990s, including cuts to the 1973 national affordable housing program. The government solution for homelessness was to create more homeless shelters and to increase emergency services. In the larger metropolitan areas like Toronto the use of homeless shelters increased by 75% from 1988 to 1998. Urban centres such as Montreal, Laval, Vancouver, Edmonton, and Calgary all experienced increasing homelessness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness in the United States</span> Human condition

Homelessness in the United States refers to the issue of homelessness in the United States, a condition wherein people lack "a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence" as defined by The McKinney–Vento Homeless Assistance Act. Point-in-time single night counts prepared by shelter providers differ greatly from federal government accounts. In 2014, approximately 1.5 million sheltered homeless people were counted. The federal government statistics are prepared by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development's Annual Homeless Assessment Report; as of 2018, HUD reported there were roughly 553,000 homeless people in the United States on a given night, or 0.17% of the population. Annual federal HUD reports contradict private state and local reports where homelessness is shown to have increased each year since 2014 across several major American cities, with 40 percent increases noted in 2017 and in 2019. In January 2018 the federal government statistics gave comprehensive encompassing nationwide statistics, with a total number of 552,830 individuals, of which 358,363 (65%) were sheltered in provided housing, while some 194,467 (35%) were unsheltered.

Emergency shelter Type of temporary shelter

An emergency shelter is a place for people to live temporarily when they cannot live in their previous residence, similar to homeless shelters. The main difference is that an emergency shelter typically specializes in people fleeing a specific type of situation, such as natural or man-made disasters, domestic violence, or victims of sexual abuse. A more minor difference is that people staying in emergency shelters are more likely to stay all day, except for work, school, or errands, while homeless shelters usually expect people to stay elsewhere during the day, returning only to sleep or eat. Emergency shelters sometimes facilitate support groups, and/or provide meals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homeless shelter</span> Service agency which provide temporary residence for homeless people

Homeless shelters are a type of homeless service agency which provide temporary residence for homeless individuals and families. Shelters exist to provide residents with safety and protection from exposure to the weather while simultaneously reducing the environmental impact on the community. They are similar to, but distinguishable from, various types of emergency shelters, which are typically operated for specific circumstances and populations—fleeing natural disasters or abusive social circumstances. Extreme weather conditions create problems similar to disaster management scenarios, and are handled with warming centers, which typically operate for short durations during adverse weather.

Affordable housing Housing affordable to those with a median household income

Affordable housing is housing which is deemed affordable to those with a household income at or below the median as rated by the national government or a local government by a recognized housing affordability index. Most of the literature on affordable housing refers to mortgages and a number of forms that exist along a continuum – from emergency homeless shelters, to transitional housing, to non-market rental, to formal and informal rental, indigenous housing, and ending with affordable home ownership.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness</span> Circumstance when people have no permanent home

Homelessness or houselessness – also known as a state of being unhoused or unsheltered – is the condition of lacking stable, safe, and adequate housing. People can be categorized as homeless if they are:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Discrimination against homeless people</span>

Discrimination against homeless people is the act of treating homeless people, or people perceived to be homeless, unfavorably. As with most types of discrimination, it can manifest in numerous forms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness in Seattle</span>

In the Seattle King County area, there were estimated to be 11,751 homeless people living on the streets or in shelters. On January 24, 2020, the count of unsheltered homeless individuals was 5,578. The number of individuals without homes in Emergency Shelters was 4,085 and the number of homeless individuals in Transitional housing was 2,088, for a total count of 11,751 unsheltered people.

Perhaps the most accurate and current data on homelessness in the United States is reported annually by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in the Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress (AHAR). The AHAR report relies on data from two sources: single-night, point-in-time counts of both sheltered and unsheltered homeless populations reported on the Continuum of Care applications to HUD; and counts of the sheltered homeless population over a full year provided by a sample of communities based on data in their local Homeless Management Information Systems (HMIS).

2011 Groundhog Day blizzard 2011 blizzard affecting the U.S. and Canada

The 2011 Groundhog Day blizzard was a powerful and historic winter storm that affected large swaths of the United States and Canada from January 31 to February 2, 2011, especially on Groundhog Day. During the initial stages of the storm, some meteorologists predicted that the system would affect over 100 million people in the United States. The storm brought cold air, heavy snowfall, blowing snow, and mixed precipitation on a path from New Mexico and northern Texas to New England and Eastern Canada. The Chicago area saw 21.2 inches (54 cm) of snow and blizzard conditions, with winds of over 60 mph (100 km/h). With such continuous winds, the Blizzard continued to the north and affected Eastern and Atlantic Canada. Blizzard conditions affected many other large cities along the storm's path, including Tulsa, Oklahoma City, Kansas City, St. Louis, Springfield, El Paso, Las Cruces, Des Moines, Milwaukee, Detroit, Chicago, Indianapolis, Dayton, Cleveland, New York City, New York's Capital District, and Boston. Many other areas not normally used to extreme winter conditions, including Albuquerque, Dallas and Houston, experienced significant snowfall or ice accumulation. The central Illinois National Weather Service in Lincoln, Illinois, issued only their fourth blizzard warning in the forecast office's 16-year history. Snowfall amounts of 20 to 28 inches were forecast for much of Northern and Western Illinois.

Homelessness in the San Francisco Bay Area Overview of homelessness in the San Francisco Bay Area

The San Francisco Bay Area comprises nine northern California counties and contains four of the ten most expensive counties in the United States. Strong economic growth has created hundreds of thousands of new jobs, but coupled with severe restrictions on building new housing units, it has resulted in an extreme housing shortage which has driven rents to extremely high levels. The Sacramento Bee notes that large cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles both attribute their recent increases in homeless people to the housing shortage, with the result that homelessness in California overall has increased by 15% from 2015 to 2017. In September 2019, the Council of Economic Advisers released a report in which they stated that deregulation of the housing markets would reduce homelessness in some of the most constrained markets by estimates of 54% in San Francisco, 40 percent in Los Angeles, and 38 percent in San Diego, because rents would fall by 55 percent, 41 percent, and 39 percent respectively. In San Francisco, a minimum wage worker would have to work approximately 4.7 full-time jobs to be able to spend less than 30% of their income on renting a two-bedroom apartment.

A managed alcohol program is a program meant to reduce harm for chronic alcoholics. The program involves providing a regular dose of alcohol to individuals with alcohol addiction, typically at a shelter-based harm reduction centre.

Homelessness in Colorado

Homelessness is a growing problem in Colorado and is considered the most important social determinants of health. Homelessness is very difficult for many Coloradoans to escape due to the continuous increase in costs for housing in Colorado along with mental health treatments and other factors. When people are forced to live without stable shelter, they are then exposed to a number of risk factors that affect physical and mental health. Although it is difficult to pin point any one cause of homelessness, there is a complicated combination of societal and individual causes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness in California</span>

Homelessness in California is considered a major social issue.

In September 2021, an average of 47,916 people slept in New York City's homeless shelters each night. This included 18,236 single adults, 14,946 children, and 14,734 adults in families. The total number peaked in November 2018, with 63,636 people sleeping in homeless shelters. Since March 2020, the number of people sleeping in shelters has declined significantly, likely an effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. The city reported that in 2019, 3,600 individuals experienced unsheltered homelessness.

We Heart Seattle (WHS), formerly We Heart Downtown Seattle and incorporated as I Heart Downtown Seattle, is a volunteer organization responding to homelessness in Seattle. The group organizes volunteer trash cleanups in public parks in which homeless people have established camps, primarily through a public Facebook group and Facebook events. Their affiliate We Heart Portland started performing similar cleanups in Portland, Oregon in May 2022.

2020 Minneapolis park encampments Homeless encampments in city parks

The U.S. city of Minneapolis featured officially and unofficially designated camp sites in city parks for people experiencing homelessness that operated from June 10, 2020, to January 7, 2021. The emergence of encampments on public property in Minneapolis was the result of pervasive homelessness, mitigations measures related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Minnesota, local unrest after the murder of George Floyd, and local policies that permitted encampments. At its peak in the summer of 2020, there were thousands of people camping at dozens of park sites across the city. Many of the encampment residents came from outside of Minneapolis to live in the parks. By the end of the permit experiment, four people had died in the city's park encampments, including the city's first homicide victim of 2021, who was stabbed to death inside a tent at Minnehaha Park on January 3, 2021.

January 14–17, 2022 North American winter storm Category 2 snow and ice storm in North America

The January 14–17, 2022 North American winter storm brought widespread impacts and wintry precipitation across large sections of eastern North America and parts of Canada. Forming out of a shortwave trough on January 13, it first produced a swath of snowfall extending from the High Plains to the Midwestern United States. The storm eventually pivoted east and impacted much of the Southern United States from January 15–16 before shifting north into Central Canada, the Mid-Atlantic states, and the Northeastern United States. The system, named Winter Storm Izzy by The Weather Channel, was described as a "Saskatchewan Screamer".

References

  1. ↑ Bakht, Shayma (August 17, 2022). "Councils consider 'heat bank' offer" . Retrieved August 30, 2022.
  2. ↑ "Art galleries and libraries to become 'warm banks' as energy bills hit £3,500". The Independent. August 30, 2022. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
  3. ↑ Richmond, Randy and John Miner, The London Free Press. "A warming centre refuge". London Free Press. Retrieved February 13, 2011.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. ↑ "Freezing Temps Convert ORA into Sea Turtle Warming Center Again". Reef2reef.com. December 24, 2010. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  5. ↑ "Three shelters, "warming center" to open their doors today | KVOA.com | Tucson, Arizona". KVOA.com. February 3, 2011. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  6. 1 2 "Excessive Cold Prompts Opening of Warming Centers" (pdf) (Press release). Anne Arundel County Office of Emergency Management. December 13, 2016. Retrieved December 15, 2016.
  7. ↑ "Warming center now open at National Guard Armory in Gilroy". Gilroy Dispatch. Retrieved February 18, 2011.
  8. ↑ "Warming center opens at homeless shelter". Lompocrecord.com. November 23, 2010. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  9. ↑ "Multnomah County Homeless Families Emergency Services" (PDF). Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  10. ↑ "Windsor Locks Open Warming Center During Power Outage". WFSB. Retrieved February 14, 2011.
  11. ↑ ""Warming Center" Open at Apache Middle School &". Sierra Vista-Ft. Huachuca News. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  12. ↑ "DFSS Warming Centers". City of Chicago. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  13. ↑ "Disaster Responders—Emergency Warming Center Volunteers". Oregon Red Cross. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  14. ↑ "Emergency Warming Center 2011-12". Oregon Red Cross. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  15. 1 2 McCowan, Karen. "Home Page". Egan Warming Center. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  16. ↑ "Washington County Severe Weather/Warming Center Information". 211.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
  17. ↑ "Warming Center". Fresno.gov. January 22, 2011. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  18. ↑ Dr. Lynn Jahnke, Public Testimony, South Coast Homeless Advisory Committee, Minutes, February 10, 2011
  19. ↑ "County declared a disaster area". My Web Times. Retrieved February 15, 2011.
  20. ↑ Jahnke, Dr. Lynn. "Public Comment on Agenda Item: Request From Mayor Schneider And Councilmember House Regarding A Funding Request From Freedom Warming Centers, Santa Barbara City Council" (PDF). City of Santa Barbara.
  21. ↑ Jahnke, Dr. Lynn. "Public Comment on Agenda Item: Request From Mayor Schneider And Councilmember House Regarding A Funding Request From Freedom Warming Centers, Santa Barbara City Council". City of Santa Barbara.
  22. ↑ "Report to Santa Barbara Board of Supervisors, Steven Levios Memorial Homeless Opinion Survey". County of Santa Barbara. November 1. Retrieved 2011-02-17.{{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  23. ↑ Berlin (Territory under Allied Occupation, 1945– U.S. Sector), Germany (Territory under Allied Occupation, 1945–1955 : U.S. Zone)
  24. ↑ "Detroit cuts funding for homeless warming centers". Wsws.org. January 29, 2011. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  25. ↑ Writer: David Shadrack Smith. Directors: Jim Gaffey and David Shadrack Smith (April 9, 2008). "Inside Straight Edge". Inside. National Geographic Society. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
  26. ↑ Hendricks, Mike (2011). "After judge's warning, homeless camp with TV, Christmas lights is taken apart". The Kansas City Star. Retrieved February 14, 2011.
  27. 1 2 Brown, Tom (1986). Tom Brown's Field Guide to City and Suburban Survival . New York: Berkley Trade. ISBN   0-425-09172-4.[ page needed ]
  28. ↑ "Cities offer warming centers". The Times Company. Retrieved February 14, 2011.
  29. ↑ Spencer, Naomi. "Detroit cuts funding for homeless warming centers". World Socialist Web Site. Retrieved February 14, 2011.
  30. ↑ Francisco, Dale. "Comment on Agenda Item: Request From Mayor Schneider And Councilmember House Regarding A Funding Request From Freedom Warming Centers, Santa Barbara City Council" (PDF). City of Santa Barbara.
  31. ↑ Svitek, Patrick. "Evanston homeless find warm shelters". Daily Northwestern. Retrieved February 14, 2011.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.