Community Development Block Grant

Last updated

The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), one of the longest-running programs of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, funds local community development activities with the stated goal of providing affordable housing, anti-poverty programs, and infrastructure development. CDBG, like other block grant programs, differ from categorical grants, made for specific purposes, in that they are subject to less federal oversight and are largely used at the discretion of the state and local governments and their subgrantees.

Contents

History

The CDBG program was enacted in 1974 by President Gerald Ford through the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and took effect in January 1975. Most directly, the law was a response to the Nixon administration's 1973 funding moratorium on many Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs. [1]

President Ford emphasized the bill's potential for reducing inefficient bureaucracy, as the grant replaced seven previous programs that were "too fragmented to provide comprehensive solutions to complex local needs". [2] He also noted its potential for improving government effectiveness by "replacing Federal judgments on local development with the judgments of the people who live and work there": [3] placing more decision-making power on local funding choices in the hands of local governments who "are most familiar with local needs". [4] The CDBG was presented as explicitly meant to "redistribute influence from the federal bureaucracies to local governments" [5] - in Ford's words, to "return power from the banks of the Potomac to people in their own communities". [6]

It had bipartisan support, reportedly because liberal legislators shared its goal of extinguishing poverty and "urban blight" and conservative legislators appreciated the control the program placed in the hands of private investors and the reduction it made in the role of the United States government. Decentralizing control over community development appealed to some Democrats because the central administration of previous programs meant benefits often did not reach the targeted low-income communities, [7] while Republicans appreciated that the program was represented as meant to "limit the powers of the federal bureaucracy", [8] a political and ideological presentation reflective of "growing public resentment of big government and big bureaucracy". [9]

The law ultimately passed both houses with large bipartisan majorities. [10] [11]

Later Congressional changes created additional small CDBG set-asides that fund programs in minority-serving universities (Section 107), in US territories such as Guam, and for large-scale rehabilitation loans (Section 108).

Allocation of funds

CDBG funds are allocated on a formula basis. [12]

Upon reauthorizing CDBG in 1978, Congress instituted a dual formula to strengthen controls on how money was spent and to better serve communities with different types of problems. A city's proportion of the overall CDBG allocation is either the average of the area's fractions of the US's total population, total poverty and total amount of housing overcrowding, or the average of the area's fractions of the country's total growth lag, total poverty, and total age of housing. [13] Formula A typically benefits rapidly growing cities with high poverty that lack affordable housing. Formula B tends to benefit cities with large shares of old housing and low growth, including many affluent suburbs. [14]

HUD calculates both formulas for all entitlement grantees and awards the larger amount, but Congressional appropriation has ultimate determination on program funding. These formulas have become less well matched to community need over time, and improvements or revisions have been proposed by several analytical reports. [15] [16] [17] [18]

More than 1,100 local and state governments, called "entitlement communities", automatically qualify for the grant. Cities qualify if they have populations of at least 50,000 or are the principal city of a Metropolitan Area, as determined by the Office of Management and Budget. Counties qualify if they have populations of at least 200,000, excluding any entitlement cities, and are in a metropolitan area. [19] They are required to submit allocation reports (showing to whom and where the money was spent) and quarterly reports to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. First, "not less than 70 percent of CDBG funds must be used for activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons". Secondly, funds must be spent on eligible activities, which are broadly defined as including "community development activities directed toward neighborhood revitalization, economic development, and improved community facilities and services". Such activities may include "Acquisition of real property, Relocation and demolition, Rehabilitation of residential and non-residential structures, Construction of public facilities and improvements", and more. Third, governments must follow a plan of project selection that includes citizen participation, especially by citizens who live in "areas in which the grantee proposes to use CDBG funds". [20]

There are a number of other distribution methods of CDBG funds besides entitlement communities. The 1978 re-authorization also required HUD to award 30% of all CDBG funds to states for grants to municipalities and counties that are not entitlement communities. This is often called the "Small Cities" program, because it includes many small cities and rural counties. [21] Other programs include the CDBG Insular Area Program (for American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands), the CDBG Program Colonias Set-Aside, and the Neighborhood Stabilization Program. [22]

Nominal levels of CDBG funding have remained fairly constant over time, but they have dramatically declined over the course of the program's existence in inflation-adjusted terms, as can be seen in the figure to the right. [23]

CDBG Allocation by Year from 1975-2014 in 2016 Dollars, taken from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, inflation adjustments from the Bureau of Labor Statistics CDBG Allocation.png
CDBG Allocation by Year from 1975-2014 in 2016 Dollars, taken from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, inflation adjustments from the Bureau of Labor Statistics

Administration

Proposed CDBG projects must be consistent with broad national priorities for CDBG: activities that benefit low- and moderate-income people, the prevention or elimination of slums or blight, or other community development activities to address an urgent threat to health or safety. CDBG funds may be used for community development activities (such as real estate acquisition, relocation, demolition, rehabilitation of housing and commercial buildings), construction of public facilities and improvements (such as water, sewer, and other utilities, street paving, and sidewalks), construction and maintenance of neighborhood centers, and the conversion of school buildings, public services, and economic development and job creation/retention activities. CDBG funds can also be used for preservation and restoration of historic properties in low-income neighborhoods.[ citation needed ]

From the federal level, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has set three goals for Community Planning and Development (CPD) Programs – "To ensure decent housing; To create and maintain a suitable living environment; and To expand economic opportunities", [24] that are taken directly from the Housing and Community Development Act. On the local level, however, each city is allowed to select their own objectives and priorities underneath each of those goals that they believe will best meet the needs of their community.[ citation needed ]

Local governments receiving CDBG funds must submit two annual performance and evaluation reports. [25] First, an Annual Action Plan for the upcoming fiscal year that also serves as an application for funds is due to HUD in mid-May. This plan includes the area's expected funding resources and stated community development goals and provides information about planned projects including their geographic distribution and the activity categories and development objectives they fall under. The creation of the Action Plans includes community outreach, public meetings, and the solicitation of Requests for Proposals from city government departments and local nonprofits of activities that could be funded. Additionally, every five years the Annual Action Plan is submitted alongside a Consolidated Plan that outlines the area's long-term community development needs, priorities, and strategic plan. Second, a Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) covering the previous fiscal year is submitted to HUD at the end of September to ensure the cities are meeting objectives. The CAPER includes "a description of the progress made in accomplishing the objectives" of the CDBG, and "a summary of the use of such funds during the preceding fiscal year". [26]

Nationally, CDBG funds were spent for the following purposes in 2011: [27]

In Fiscal Year 2017, the largest categories of CDBG spending were: [28]

Relations with other programs

The CDBG shares some features of the Urban Development Action Grants (UDAG). UDAG, along with urban renewal and other previous federal attempts to alleviate poverty and blight in US cities, was criticized as being a "top-down" approach. For these programs, federal planners would dictate how and where funds were spent. In contrast, CDBG was constructed to be a "bottom-up" approach.[ citation needed ]

In order to receive CDBG funds, applicants must identify urgent needs of the community, and solicit project ideas and plans from citizens and local organizations that address those needs. Thus, the CDBG program represents a significant shift in how the federal government addresses poverty and blight.

Some researchers argue that because CDBG is a bottom-up program it is significantly more successful than previous programs. Others have said CDBG's scope of allowed activities is too broad, making it difficult to measure program performance.[ citation needed ]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Department of Housing and Urban Development</span> Federal government department

The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is one of the executive departments of the U.S. federal government. It administers federal housing and urban development laws. It is headed by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, who reports directly to the President of the United States and is a member of the president's Cabinet.

A block grant is a grant-in-aid of a specified amount from a larger government to a smaller regional government body. Block grants have less oversight from the larger government and provide flexibility to each subsidiary government body in terms of designing and implementing programs. Block grants, categorical grants, and general revenue sharing are three types of federal government grants-in-aid programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Office of Community Planning and Development</span>

The Community Planning and Development agency within the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) administers the grant programs that help communities plan and finance their growth and development, increase their capacity to govern, and provide shelter and services for homeless people. HUD is a national program, and HUD provides funding directly to larger cities and counties, and for smaller cities and counties, generally to state government. HUD's programs include the Community Development Block Grant Program and the HOME program.

Gananda is a small "master planned community" in Wayne County, New York, United States, approximately twenty minutes outside the city of Rochester. Gananda is considered a community because it does not have its own zip code; it consists of a small portion of the adjoining towns of Walworth and Macedon. While originally designed to be a city with upwards of 90,000 residents, the removal of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funding brought about its current design with fewer than 6,500 residents.

The term "sustainable communities" has various definitions, but in essence refers to communities planned, built, or modified to promote sustainable living. Sustainable communities tend to focus on environmental and economic sustainability, urban infrastructure, social equity, and municipal government. The term is sometimes used synonymously with "green cities," "eco-communities," "livable cities" and "sustainable cities."

The United States Conference of Mayors (USCM) is the official non-partisan organization of cities with populations of 30,000 or more. The cities are each represented by their mayors or other chief elected officials. The organization was founded in light of the Great Depression and was formed under Herbert Hoover until its original charter was signed at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C., on the eve of the inauguration of Franklin D. Roosevelt.

In the United States, federal assistance, also known as federal aid, federal benefits, or federal funds, is defined as any federal program, project, service, or activity provided by the federal government that directly assists domestic governments, organizations, or individuals in the areas of education, health, public safety, public welfare, and public works, among others.

The HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) is a type of United States federal assistance that the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides to states to create decent and affordable housing, particularly housing for low and very low income Americans. It is the largest Federal block grant to states and local governments designed exclusively to create affordable housing for low-income families, providing approximately US$2 billion each year.

The Urban Growth and New Community Development Act is a statute enacted by the United States Congress in 1970.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Jersey Department of Community Affairs</span> State agency of New Jersey, United States

The New Jersey Department of Community Affairs is a governmental agency of the U.S. state of New Jersey.

CD Publications began as a news service firm located just outside Washington DC, United States. It produces Web-based "news services" whose topics of coverage include housing, health care, education, funding, aging and Native Americans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs</span> Department of Housing & Community Affairs, Texas

The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA) is the state's lead agency responsible for homeownership, affordable rental housing, community and energy assistance programs, and colonia activities serving primarily low income Texans. The Manufactured Housing Division of TDHCA regulates the manufactured housing industry in Texas. The Department annually administers more than $400 million through for-profit, nonprofit, and local government partnerships to deliver local housing and community-based opportunities and assistance to Texans in need. The department is headquartered at 221 East 11th Street in Austin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subsidized housing in the United States</span> Rental assistance for low-income households

In the United States, subsidized housing is administered by federal, state and local agencies to provide subsidized rental assistance for low-income households. Public housing is priced much below the market rate, allowing people to live in more convenient locations rather than move away from the city in search of lower rents. In most federally-funded rental assistance programs, the tenants' monthly rent is set at 30% of their household income. Now increasingly provided in a variety of settings and formats, originally public housing in the U.S. consisted primarily of one or more concentrated blocks of low-rise and/or high-rise apartment buildings. These complexes are operated by state and local housing authorities which are authorized and funded by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In 2020, there were one million public housing units. In 2022, about 5.2 million American households that received some form of federal rental assistance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996</span> United States law

The Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (NAHASDA) simplifies and reorganizes the system of providing housing assistance to federally recognized Native American tribes to help improve their housing and other infrastructure. It reduced the regulatory strictures that burdened tribes and essentially provided for block grants so that they could apply funds to building or renovating housing as they saw fit. This was in line with other federal programs that recognized the sovereignty of tribes and allowed them to manage the funds according to their own priorities. A new program division was established at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that combined several previous programs into one block grant program committed to the goal of tribal housing. The legislation has been reauthorized and amended several times since its passage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity</span> US Government agency

The Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity (FHEO) is an agency within the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. FHEO is responsible for administering and enforcing federal fair housing laws and establishing policies that make sure all Americans have equal access to the housing of their choice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Housing trust fund</span>

Housing trust funds are established sources of funding for affordable housing construction and other related purposes created by governments in the United States (U.S.). Housing Trust Funds (HTF) began as a way of funding affordable housing in the late 1970s. Since then, elected government officials from all levels of government in the U.S. have established housing trust funds to support the construction, acquisition, and preservation of affordable housing and related services to meet the housing needs of low-income households. Ideally, HTFs are funded through dedicated revenues like real estate transfer taxes or document recording fees to ensure a steady stream of funding rather than being dependent on regular budget processes. As of 2016, 400 state, local and county trust funds existed across the U.S.

Non-profit housing developers build affordable housing for individuals under-served by the private market. The non-profit housing sector is composed of community development corporations (CDC) and national and regional non-profit housing organizations whose mission is to provide for the needy, the elderly, working households, and others that the private housing market does not adequately serve. Of the total 4.6 million units in the social housing sector, non-profit developers have produced approximately 1.547 million units, or roughly one-third of the total stock. Since non-profit developers seldom have the financial resources or access to capital that for-profit entities do, they often use multiple layers of financing, usually from a variety of sources for both development and operation of these affordable housing units.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Department of Housing and Community Development</span>

The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is a department within the California Business, Consumer Services and Housing Agency that develops housing policy and building codes, regulates manufactured homes and mobilehome parks, and administers housing finance, economic development and community development programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Howard County Housing and Community Development</span>

Howard County Housing is the umbrella organization for the Howard County Department of Housing and Community Development and the Howard County Housing Commission. The Department is Howard County Government’s housing agency, and the Commission is a public housing authority and non-profit. Both have boards that meet monthly.

Moving to Work (MTW) is a demonstration program for public housing authorities (PHAs) that provides them the opportunity to design and test innovative, locally designed strategies that use Federal dollars more efficiently, help residents find employment and become self-sufficient, and increase housing choices for low-income families. MTW gives PHAs exemptions from many existing public housing and voucher rules and more flexibility with how they use their Federal funds. PHAs can use special funding formulas for MTW agencies and permit agencies to shift funds between the programs or to other uses.

References

  1. ↑ "40 Years Ago: August 22, President Ford Signs Housing and Community Development Act of 1974". National Low Income Housing Coalition. August 18, 2014. Archived from the original on March 5, 2018. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  2. ↑ Hawkins, William (July 1999). "CDBG: A Practitioner Looks Back". Journal of Housing & Community Development. 56 (4): 26–32. Archived from the original on March 6, 2018. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  3. ↑ Ford, Gerald (August 22, 1974). Statement on the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (Speech). The White House, Washington, D.C.: The American Presidency Project. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  4. ↑ Rosenfeld, Raymond (October 1979). "Local Implementation Decisions for Community Development Block Grants". Public Administration Review. 39 (5): 448–457. doi:10.2307/3109919. JSTOR   3109919.
  5. ↑ Frej, William; Specht, Harry (June 1976). "The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974: Implications for Policy and Planning". Social Service Review. 50 (2): 275–292. doi:10.1086/643371. JSTOR   30015353. S2CID   143656092.
  6. ↑ Ford, Gerald (August 22, 1974). Statement on the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (Speech). The White House, Washington, D.C.: The American Presidency Project. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  7. ↑ Lange, Jeffrey; O'Brien, David (October 1978). "A Focus on Policy Feature: Needs and Formulas: Operationalizing Justice in Community Development Funding". Sociological Focus. 11 (4): 317–327. doi:10.1080/00380237.1978.10570327. JSTOR   20831097.
  8. ↑ Richard P. Nathan; Paul R. Dommel; Sarah F. Liebschutz; Milton D. Morris; et al. (January 1977). Block Grants for Community Development (PDF) (Report). The Brookings Institution / US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  9. ↑ Schmandt, Henry; Wendel, George; Otte, George (Summer 1983). "CDBG: Continuity or Change?". Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 13 (3): 7–22. doi:10.2307/3330081. JSTOR   3330081.
  10. ↑ "TO AGREE TO THE CONFERENCE REPORT ON S.3066, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974". GovTrack. Civic Impulse, LLC. August 13, 1974. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  11. ↑ "TO AGREE TO THE CONFERENCE REPORT ON S. 3066, HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974: HOUSE". GovTrack. Civic Impulse, LLC. August 15, 1974. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  12. ↑ "U.S.C. Title 42 §5306. Allocation and distribution of funds". gpo.gov. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved June 14, 2021.
  13. ↑ "U.S.C. Title 42 §5306. Allocation and distribution of funds". gpo.gov. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved June 14, 2021.
  14. ↑ "CDBG Formula Targeting to Community Development Need" (PDF). U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved June 14, 2021.
  15. ↑ Brett Theodos; Christina Plerhoples Stacy; Helen Ho (April 2017). Taking Stock of the Community Development Block Grant (PDF) (Report). The Urban Institute Metropolitan Housing and Communities Policy Center. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  16. ↑ Stanley Czerwinski (June 27, 2006). Community Development Block Grant Formula: Options for Improving the Targeting of Funds (PDF) (Report). United States Government Accountability Office. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  17. ↑ Paul Posner (April 26, 2005). Community Development Block Grant Formula: Targeting Assistance to High-Need Communities Could Be Enhanced (PDF) (Report). United States Government Accountability Office. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  18. ↑ "CDBG Formula Targeting to Community Development Need" (PDF). U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved June 14, 2021.
  19. ↑ "CDBG Entitlement Program Eligibility Requirements". HUD Exchange. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved June 14, 2021.
  20. ↑ "CDBG Entitlement Program Eligibility Requirements". HUD Exchange. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved June 14, 2021.
  21. ↑ "Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) (Entitlement)". HUD Portal. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Archived from the original on October 24, 2011. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  22. ↑ "Community Development Block Grant Program - CDBG". HUD.gov. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  23. ↑ "CDBG Funding and Number of Metro Cities & Urban Counties, by Fiscal Year" (PDF). HUD Exchange. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  24. ↑ Beverly Johnson; Benita DeFrank (2017). City of Pomona Fiscal Year 17-18 Annual Action Plan (PDF) (Report). City of Pomona, California. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  25. ↑ "U.S.C. Title 42 §5304. Statement of activities and review". gpo.gov. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  26. ↑ "U.S.C. Title 42 §5313. Reporting requirements". gpo.gov. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
  27. ↑ "CDBG Expenditure Reports/U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)". Portal.hud.gov. Archived from the original on May 17, 2017. Retrieved September 20, 2012.
  28. ↑ "CDBG Expenditure Reports - National Expenditure Reports (FY 2001 - FY 2017)". HUD Exchange. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Retrieved March 4, 2018.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.