2016 Washington, D.C., statehood referendum

Last updated

2016 Washington, D.C., statehood referendum
Flag of the District of Columbia.svg
November 8, 2016 (2016-11-08)
Shall the voters of the District of Columbia advise the Council to approve or reject this proposal?
Voting system Simple majority
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svgYes234,13485.17%
Light brown x.svgNo40,77914.83%
Valid votes274,91388.38%
Invalid or blank votes16,1545.19%
Total votes311,067100.00%
Registered voters/turnout478,68864.98%
DC Referendum B 2016.svg
Precinct results
Yes
  90–100%
  80–90%
  70–80%

A referendum on statehood for the District of Columbia was held on November 8, 2016. It was the first referendum on statehood to be held in the district. [1] The District of Columbia was created following the passage of the Residence Act on July 9, 1790, which approved the creation of a national capital, the City of Washington on the Potomac River.

Contents

District of Columbia voters were asked to advise the Council to approve or reject a proposal, which included advising the council to petition Congress to admit the District as the 51st state and to approve a constitution and boundaries for the new state. The voters of the District of Columbia voted overwhelmingly to advise the Council to approve the proposal, with 85.69% of voters voting to advise approving the proposal. [2]

Background

Formation

On July 9, 1790, Congress passed the Residence Act, which approved the creation of a national capital on the Potomac River. The exact location was to be selected by President George Washington, who signed the bill into law on July 16. Formed from land donated by the states of Maryland and Virginia, the initial shape of the federal district was a square measuring 10 miles (16 km) on each side, totaling 100 square miles (259 km2). [3] [lower-alpha 1]

Congress passed the Organic Act of 1801, which officially organized the District and placed the entire territory under the exclusive control of the federal government. Further, the unincorporated area within the District was organized into two counties: the County of Washington to the east of the Potomac and the County of Alexandria to the west. [4] After the passage of this Act, citizens living in the District were no longer considered residents of Maryland or Virginia, which therefore ended their representation in Congress. [5]

The Virginia General Assembly voted in February 1846 to accept the return of Alexandria. On July 9, 1846, Congress agreed to return all the territory that Virginia had ceded. Therefore, the District's current area consists only of Maryland's originally donated portion. Confirming the fears of pro-slavery Alexandrians, the Compromise of 1850 outlawed the slave trade in the District, although not slavery itself. [6]

Voting rights and home rule

In 1961, the Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified, granting the District three votes in the Electoral College for the election of president and vice president, but still no voting representation in Congress. [7]

In 1973, Congress enacted the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, providing for an elected mayor and 13-member council for the District. [8]

Earlier attempts at statehood

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 1 of the Constitution gives Congress power to grant statehood. If the District were to become a state, congressional authority over the District would be terminated, and residents would have full voting representation in both houses of Congress. However, there are several constitutional considerations with any such statehood proposal.

In 1980, local citizens passed an initiative calling for a constitutional convention for a new state. In 1982, voters ratified the constitution of a new state to be called "New Columbia". [9] This campaign for statehood stalled. After the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment expired in 1985, another constitution for the state of New Columbia was drafted in 1987. [9] The House of Representatives last voted on D.C. statehood in November 1993, and the proposal was defeated 277–153. Like retrocession, it has been argued that D.C. statehood would erode the principle of a separate federal territory as the seat of the federal government and that a constitutional amendment would be needed to avoid a violation of the Constitution's District Clause. [10]

In July 2014, President Barack Obama became the second sitting President, after Bill Clinton in 1993, to endorse statehood for the District of Columbia. In a town-hall event, he said, "I'm for it." He added that "folks in D.C. pay taxes like everybody else, they contribute to the overall well-being of the country like everybody else, they should be treated like everybody else," Obama said in response to a question. "There has been a long movement to get D.C. statehood, and I've been for it for quite some time. The politics of it end up being difficult to get through Congress, but I think it's absolutely the right thing to do." [11] [12] D.C. residents now pay more in taxes than 22 states. [13]

For more than 20 years following the 1993 floor vote, there were no congressional hearings on D.C. statehood. But on September 15, 2014, the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs held a hearing on bill S. 132, which would have created a new state out of the current District of Columbia, similar to the 1993 bill. [14]

Modern statehood movement

On April 15, 2016, District Mayor Muriel Bowser called for a citywide vote on whether the District should become the 51st state. [15] This was followed by the release of a proposed state constitution. [16] This constitution would make the Mayor of the District of Columbia the governor of the proposed state, while the members of the City Council would make up the proposed House of Delegates.

On July 10, 2016, the D.C. Council unanimously approved the referendum. If the people approve the proposal, the council will vote to approve the measure. [17]

Ballot

The District of Columbia voters were asked whether to advise the District Council to approve or reject a four-part proposal, where advising the council to approve the proposal would establish that the citizens of the District of Columbia (1) agree that the District should be admitted to the Union as the State of New Columbia; (2) approve of a Constitution of the State of New Columbia to be adopted by the Council; (3) approve the State of New Columbia's boundaries, as adopted by the New Columbia Statehood Commission on June 28, 2016; and (4) agree that the State of New Columbia shall guarantee an elected representative form of government. [18]

However, while “New Columbia” appeared on voting ballots, the Council of the District of Columbia passed legislation changing the name of the proposed state to the "State of Washington, D.C." Under this proposed name "D.C." stands for "Douglass Commonwealth," a reference to the historic abolitionist Frederick Douglass. [19] [20]

Proposed Constitution

Boundaries

Proposed boundaries State of Washington, DC Boundaries.png
Proposed boundaries

The boundaries of the proposed state would be about the same as the boundaries of the District, except for a small area around the National Mall and the White House, allowing the federal government to maintain control over a much smaller district. [21]

Government structure

The legislative branch of the proposed state government would consist of a unicameral 21-member Legislative Assembly. Each member of the legislature would serve a four-year term. The Governor of the proposed state would serve four-year terms and be elected in even years where there is no federal presidential election. When a vacancy occurs in the office, the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly would become the acting Governor until a special election occurs, which would have to occur at least seventy days, but no more than 174 days after the office becomes vacant. The proposed state would also be fiscally responsible for its judicial system, which the federal government currently funds. The attorney general would remain an independently elected office, while the new state would no longer have to submit laws or budgets to Congress for approval, as the District of Columbia is required to now. [22]

Two years after the proposed state is admitted to the union, a constitutional convention would be called to make changes to the state constitution, and any changes would be voted on for approval or rejection by the voters of the proposed state.

Results

In this election, when asked the referendum question, "Shall the voters of the District of Columbia advise the Council to approve or reject this proposal," this was the tally of the final vote:

Advisory Referendum B
ChoiceVotes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes244,13485.69
No40,77914.31
Valid votes284,91391.59
Invalid or blank votes26,1548.41
Total votes311,067100.00
Registered voters/turnout478,68864.98
Source: [23]

Aftermath

While a majority of residents voted in favor of statehood, numerous challenges still exist that might hamper creation of the state, including lack of Congressional support; DC currently does not have voting-level congressional representation, and the national Republican Party is against the idea of statehood, [24] due in part to political concerns that DC statehood would be detrimental to the Republicans since the new state would likely send an entirely Democratic delegation to Congress. [25]

The prospect of statehood may raise Constitutional problems. "Article I, Section 8 [of the U.S. Constitution] provides explicitly for a national capital that would not be part of a state nor treated as a state, but rather a unique enclave under the exclusive authority of Congress—a neutral 'district' in which representatives of all the states could meet on an equal footing to conduct the nation's business." Statehood for Washington, D.C., would thus imply the passage of a Constitutional amendment and the creation of a new district to serve as the seat of the federal government. [26] However, the DC Admission Act retains a federal "district" (the bill dubs it "The Capital") that the federal government will still administer by shrinking the existing federal district down to a minimal size while granting the rest of DC statehood.

In 2017, separate bills were introduced by the District's non-voting Delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton, and Tom Carper, a senator from Delaware, for statehood, which again failed to reach a vote.

In 2019, following the 2018 election that saw the Democratic Party regain control of the House of Representatives, the Democratic leadership put its support behind the admission of the District as a state, [27] with Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, one of the 155 co-sponsors of the Bill introduced by Eleanor Holmes Norton in January 2019. [28] The House passed H.R. 1, a nonbinding resolution of support for statehood, in March 2019. [29]

In June 2020, during the George Floyd protests that took place across the country, then-U.S. President Trump called in the District of Columbia National Guard to clear protesters, an action that angered the District's mayor and council; owing to the District's status, the President of the United States is the commander-in-chief of the National Guard, whereas in a state the commander-in-chief is the state's governor. On June 26, for the first time, D.C. statehood was approved by a chamber of Congress when the House voted 232–180 to approve the Washington, D.C., Admission Act, thereby sending it to the Senate. [30] Again sponsored in the Senate by Tom Carper, with the majority of the Democratic caucus as co-sponsors, the bill was the first time that the issue of DC statehood had reached the floor of the Senate. [31]

Voting for the bill in the House of Representatives was along party lines, with Democrats in favor of admitting the District of Columbia as a state and Republicans opposed. In response to the passing of the bill in the House, several Republican members of the Senate labeled the legislation as a "power grab" as, in their view, it would give the Democrats an almost guaranteed two seats in the United States Senate, given that the District has voted overwhelmingly Democratic for decades. [32] The Trump Administration also made clear that, were a bill admitting the District of Columbia as a state to be passed by Congress, Trump would veto it. [33]

The election of Joe Biden as President removed the threat of a presidential veto to such a bill, as Biden has declared his support to admit the District of Columbia. [34] However, Mitch McConnell, the then Senate Majority Leader, made it clear that while there remains a Republican majority in the Senate, any D.C. admission bill would not be granted a vote on the floor of the Senate. This would require the introduction of a new bill once the new session of Congress began on January 3, 2021. [34]

On January 4, Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District of Columbia's non-voting delegate, reintroduced H.R. 51 into the 117th Congress with a record 202 co-sponsors. [35] [36] On January 6, following the victory of the two Democratic candidates in the Senate elections in Georgia that gave the Democrats the majority, and thus made Senator Chuck Schumer (a D.C. statehood supporter himself) the new Majority Leader, the Mayor of Washington, D.C., Muriel Bowser, issued a statement renewing the call for statehood for the District, stating her desire to see a Statehood bill on the desk of President Biden within 100 days of the start of the new Congress. [37] The same day, the storming and occupation of the United States Capitol mainly by supporters of Donald Trump led to calls from others for the District's status to be changed; because of its status, the activation of the District of Columbia National Guard to assist local law enforcement required the consent of the Secretary of the Army, while the Governors of Virginia and Maryland were able to activate units of their states' National Guard directly. [38] [39] On January 27, a companion bill, S. 51, was introduced into the Senate by Tom Carper with a record 38 co-sponsors. [40] On April 14, the United States House Committee on Oversight and Reform voted to pass the bill, paving the way for the House of Representatives to vote on it. [41] The House passed H.R. 51 on the 22nd with a vote of 216–208. [42]

On April 30, Democratic senator Joe Manchin came out against both H.R. 51 and S. 51, effectively dooming their passage. [43]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1961 amendment granting presidential electors to the District of Columbia

The Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution extends the right to participate in presidential elections to the District of Columbia. The amendment grants to the district electors in the Electoral College, as though it were a state, though the district can never have more electors than the least-populous state. How the electors are appointed is to be determined by Congress. The Twenty-third Amendment was proposed by the 86th Congress on June 16, 1960; it was ratified by the requisite number of states on March 29, 1961.

A constitutional amendment is a modification of the constitution of a polity, organization or other type of entity. Amendments are often interwoven into the relevant sections of an existing constitution, directly altering the text. Conversely, they can be appended to the constitution as supplemental additions, thus changing the frame of government without altering the existing text of the document.

The posts of shadow United States senator and shadow United States representative are held by elected or appointed government officials from subnational polities of the United States that lack congressional vote. While these officials are not seated in either chamber of Congress, they seek recognition for their subnational polity, up to full statehood. This would enfranchise them with full voting rights on the floor of the U.S. House and Senate, alongside existing states. As of 2021, only the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico currently have authorized shadow delegations to Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">51st state</span> Proposals to admit a new state into the United States

The 51st state in American political discourse refers to the concept of granting statehood to one of the United States' territories, splitting one or more of the existing states up to form a new state, or granting statehood to the District of Columbia, thereby increasing the number of states in the Union from 50 to 51; a new state has not been admitted since Hawaii in 1959.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia statehood movement</span> Movement to make the United States capital a state

The District of Columbia statehood movement is a political movement that advocates making the District of Columbia a U.S. state, to provide the residents of the District of Columbia with voting representation in the Congress and complete control over local affairs.

A supermajority is a requirement for a proposal to gain a specified level of support which is greater than the threshold of one-half used for a simple majority. Supermajority rules in a democracy can help to prevent a majority from eroding fundamental rights of a minority, but can also hamper efforts to respond to problems and encourage corrupt compromises at times when action is taken. Changes to constitutions, especially those with entrenched clauses, commonly require supermajority support in a legislature. Parliamentary procedure requires that any action of a deliberative assembly that may alter the rights of a minority have a supermajority requirement, such as a two-thirds vote. In consensus democracy the supermajority rule is applied in most cases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia home rule</span> Autonomous rule in the United States capital

District of Columbia home rule is the District of Columbia residents' ability to govern their local affairs. As the federal capital, the Constitution grants the United States Congress exclusive jurisdiction over the District in "all cases whatsoever".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia federal voting rights</span>

Voting rights of citizens in the District of Columbia differ from the rights of citizens in the 50 U.S. states. The United States Constitution grants each state voting representation in both houses of the United States Congress. It defines the federal district as being outside of any state, and does not grant it any voting representation in Congress. The Constitution grants Congress exclusive jurisdiction over the District in "all cases whatsoever".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia retrocession</span> Return of some land of the District of Columbia to Virginia

District of Columbia retrocession is the act of returning some or all of the land that had been ceded to the federal government of the United States for the purpose of creating its federal district for the new national capital, which was moved from Philadelphia to what was then called the City of Washington in 1800. The land was originally ceded to the federal government by Virginia and Maryland in 1790. After moving through various stages of federal and state approval, the Virginia portion was returned in March 1847.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Colorado</span>

The Constitution of the State of Colorado is the foundation of the laws and government of the U.S. state of Colorado. The Colorado State Constitution was drafted on March 14, 1876; approved by Colorado voters on July 1, 1876; and took effect upon the statehood of Colorado on August 1, 1876. As of 2020, the constitution has been amended at least 166 times. The Constitution of Colorado derives its authority from the sovereignty of the people. As such, the people of Colorado reserved specific powers in governing Colorado directly; in addition to providing for voting for Governor, state legislators, and judges, the people of Colorado have reserved initiative of laws and referendum of laws enacted by the legislature to themselves, provided for recall of office holders, and limit tax increases beyond set amounts without explicit voter approval, and must explicitly approve any change to the constitution, often with a 55% majority. The Colorado state constitution is one of the longest in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in the District of Columbia</span>

The District of Columbia holds general elections every two years to fill various D.C. government offices, including mayor, attorney general, members of the D.C. Council, members of the D.C. State Board of Education, and members of its Advisory Neighborhood Commissions. Special elections may be held to fill vacancies at other points in time. Additionally, citywide ballot measures may be proposed and voted on.

The following table indicates the party of elected officials in the United States federal district Washington, D.C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">U.S. state</span> Constituent polity of the United States

In the United States, a state is a constituent political entity, of which there are 50. Bound together in a political union, each state holds governmental jurisdiction over a separate and defined geographic territory where it shares its sovereignty with the federal government. Due to this shared sovereignty, Americans are citizens both of the federal republic and of the state in which they reside. State citizenship and residency are flexible, and no government approval is required to move between states, except for persons restricted by certain types of court orders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Puerto Rico statehood movement</span> Movement to grant Puerto Rico U.S. statehood

The Puerto Rico statehood movement aims to make Puerto Rico a state of the United States. Puerto Rico is an unincorporated territorial possession of the United States acquired in 1898 following the Spanish–American War, making it "the oldest colony in the modern world". As of 2023, the population of Puerto Rico is 3.2 million, around half the average state population and higher than that of 19 U.S. states. Statehood is one of several competing options for the future political status of Puerto Rico, including: maintaining its current status, becoming fully independent, or becoming a freely associated state. Puerto Rico has held six referendums on the topic. These are non-binding, as the power to grant statehood lies with the US Congress. The most recent referendum was in November 2020, with a majority (52.52%) of those who voted opting for statehood.

A referendum on the political status of Puerto Rico was held in Puerto Rico on November 6, 2012. It was the fourth referendum on status to be held in Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico has been an unincorporated territory of the United States since the Spanish–American War in 1898.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States presidential elections in the District of Columbia</span>

Since the enactment of the 23rd amendment to the Constitution in 1961, the District of Columbia has participated in 15 presidential elections. The amendment states that it cannot have any more electoral votes than the state with the smallest number of electors. Since then, it has been allocated three electoral votes in every presidential election. The Democratic Party has immense political strength in the district. In each of the 15 presidential elections, the district has overwhelmingly voted for the Democratic candidate, with no margin less than 56.5 percentage points. It has been won by the losing candidate in 8 of the 15 elections.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Puerto Rican status referendum</span> Referendum on becoming a US state

A referendum of the status of Puerto Rico was held on November 3, 2020, concurrently with the general election. The Referendum was announced by Puerto Rico Governor Wanda Vázquez Garced on May 16, 2020. This was the sixth referendum held on the status of Puerto Rico, with the previous one having taken place in 2017. This was the first referendum with a simple yes-or-no question, with voters having the option of voting for or against becoming a U.S. state. The New Progressive Party (PNP), of whom Vázquez is a member, supports statehood, while the opposition Popular Democratic Party (PDP) and Puerto Rican Independence Party (PIP) oppose it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Washington, D.C., Admission Act</span> Proposed bill in the United States Congress

The Washington, D.C., Admission Act, often referred to simply as the D.C. Admission Act, is a bill introduced during the 116th United States Congress. The bill would grant Washington, D.C., admission into the Union as a state. The bill was originally introduced in the 116th Congress on January 3, 2019, and was reintroduced on January 4, 2021, and January 9, 2023, in the 117th and 118th Congresses. The United States House of Representatives passed it on April 22, 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Puerto Rico Status Act</span>

The Puerto Rico Status Act, H.R. 2757, was a bill introduced during the 116th United States Congress. The intention of the bill is to grant Puerto Rico, an unincorporated territory of the United States, admission into the Union as a state. The bill was originally introduced in the 116th Congress and was reintroduced as H.R. 1522, on March 2, 2021, in the 117th Congress. It was referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources with last action taken on June 16.

References

  1. ↑ Simpson, Ian (November 5, 2016). "Freedom or 'fool's errand'? D.C. to vote on statehood referendum". Reuters. Retrieved June 22, 2021.
  2. ↑ "DC Voters Elect Gray to Council, Approve Statehood Measure". 4 NBC Washington. November 9, 2016. Retrieved November 9, 2016.
  3. 1 2 Crew, Harvey W.; William Bensing Webb; John Wooldridge (1892). Centennial History of the City of Washington, D. C. Dayton, Ohio: United Brethren Publishing House. pp. 89–92.
  4. ↑ Crew, Harvey W.; William Bensing Webb; John Wooldridge (1892). "IV. Permanent Capital Site Selected". Centennial History of the City of Washington, D. C. Dayton, Ohio: United Brethren Publishing House. p. 103.
  5. ↑ "Statement on the subject of The District of Columbia Fair and Equal Voting Rights Act" (PDF). American Bar Association. September 14, 2006. Retrieved August 10, 2011.
  6. ↑ "Compromise of 1850". Library of Congress. September 21, 2007. Retrieved July 24, 2008.
  7. ↑ "Twenty-Third Amendment". CRS Annotated Constitution. Legal Information Institute (Cornell University Law School). Retrieved August 28, 2012.
  8. ↑ "District of Columbia Home Rule Act". Government of the District of Columbia. February 1999. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
  9. 1 2 "District of Columbia Official Code". Westlaw. 2009. Retrieved May 3, 2009.
  10. ↑ Pate, Hewitt R. (August 27, 1993). "D.C. Statehood: Not Without a Constitutional Amendment". The Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on March 15, 2009. Retrieved December 29, 2008.
  11. ↑ "Obama On Statehood For DC: 'I'm For It'". Archived from the original on July 22, 2014. Retrieved July 21, 2014.
  12. ↑ "Obama on D.C. statehood: 'I'm for it!'". Usatoday.com. July 21, 2014. Retrieved July 7, 2016.
  13. ↑ "D.C. paid more in taxes". July 29, 2016. Archived from the original on August 9, 2016.
  14. ↑ Simpson, Ian (September 15, 2014). "Senate holds hearing on District of Columbia statehood". Reuters. Retrieved September 15, 2014.
  15. ↑ Austermuhle, Martin. "Mayor Wants Statehood Vote This Year By D.C. Residents". WAMU 88.5. Retrieved April 15, 2016.
  16. ↑ Giambrone, Andrew (April 29, 2016). "D.C. Statehood Commission Will Release Draft Constitution Next Friday". Washington City Paper. Retrieved May 15, 2016.
  17. ↑ Davis, Aaron C. (July 12, 2016). "D.C. statehood measure approved for November ballot". The Washington Post . Retrieved November 8, 2016.
  18. ↑ "Resolution 21-570, Advisory Referendum on the State of New Columbia Admission Act Resolution of 2016". DC Municipal Regulations. Archived from the original on August 18, 2016. Retrieved November 8, 2016.
  19. ↑ Giaritelli, Anna (October 18, 2016). "DC Council approves name change if city becomes state". The Washington Examiner . Retrieved October 19, 2016.
  20. ↑ Kurzius, Rachel (October 18, 2016). "Council Tosses 'New Columbia,' Changes Constitution To 'The State Of Washington D.C.'". DCist. Archived from the original on November 16, 2016. Retrieved November 8, 2016.
  21. ↑ "A Resolution 21-621" (PDF). statehood.dc.gov. Retrieved November 8, 2016.
  22. ↑ Austermuhle, Martin (October 25, 2016). "If You're A D.C. Resident, Here's What You Need To Know About The Statehood Vote". WAMU . Retrieved November 8, 2016.
  23. ↑ "General Election 2016 - Certified Results". District of Columbia Board of Elections. November 8, 2016. Archived from the original on February 9, 2018. Retrieved November 12, 2018.
  24. ↑ "D.C. votes for statehood but faces long road ahead". November 8, 2016. Retrieved November 10, 2016.
  25. ↑ Marcos, Cristina (September 21, 2019). "DC statehood push faces long odds despite record support". The Hill. Retrieved February 7, 2021.
  26. ↑ Jeff Jacoby (6/21/2020). "The Constitution says no to DC statehood". The Boston Globe via MSN, accessed November 15, 2020.
  27. ↑ "House leadership gives its blessing to D.C. statehood". The Washington Post. January 4, 2019.
  28. ↑ Thomas, Connor (January 18, 2019). "Pelosi Among 155 Cosponsors of DC Statehood Bill in House". The Hoya. Retrieved August 9, 2020.
  29. ↑ "The House finally voted to support D.C. statehood. It's a needed step". The Washington Post. March 12, 2019. Retrieved April 24, 2019.
  30. ↑ Millhiser, Ian (June 26, 2020). "DC is closer to becoming a state now than it has ever been". Vox. Retrieved August 9, 2020.
  31. ↑ "Norton Announces D.C. Statehood Bill Has Been Placed on Senate Floor Calendar for First Time in History". Congresswoman Eleanor Norton Holmes. September 10, 2020. Retrieved December 25, 2020.
  32. ↑ "District of Columbia". 270 to Win. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  33. ↑ Zaslav, Ali; Byrd, Hayley (July 1, 2020). "Senate Republicans fiercely oppose D.C. statehood as political 'power grab'". CNN Politics. CNN. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  34. 1 2 Lefrak, Mikaela (November 12, 2020). "After The 2020 Election Results, Here's What's Next For D.C. Statehood". American University Radio. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  35. ↑ Robertson, Thomas (January 3, 2021). "DC statehood boasts record support in new Congress". WTOP News. Retrieved January 5, 2021.
  36. ↑ H.R. 51
  37. ↑ Coleman, Justine (January 6, 2021). "Bowser renews call for vote on D.C. statehood under Biden". The Hill. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  38. ↑ Srikanth, Anagha (January 6, 2021). "DC statehood advocates sound off as National Guard is activated". The Hill. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  39. ↑ Massimo, Rick (January 7, 2021). "Hogan: Federal approval to send National Guard during Capitol attack delayed". WTOP News. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  40. ↑ Lefrak, Mikaela (January 27, 2021). "Record Number Of Senate Democrats Support D.C. Statehood Bill". DCist. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved January 28, 2021.
  41. ↑ "Committee Votes to Pass H.R. 51, the Washington D.C. Admission Act". house.gov (Press release). April 14, 2021. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved April 24, 2021.
  42. ↑ "House Passes Bill Proposing to Make Washington, D.C., the 51st State". The Wall Street Journal. April 22, 2021. Archived from the original on April 22, 2021. Retrieved April 22, 2021.
  43. ↑ Kapur, Sahil; Clark, Dartunorro (April 30, 2021). "Manchin opposes D.C. Statehood, dealing a blow to Democratic priority". NBC News. Retrieved December 18, 2022.
  1. ↑ The Residence Act allowed the President to select a location within Maryland as far east as the Anacostia River. However, the District of Columbia shifted the federal territory's borders to the southeast to include the city of Alexandria at the District's southern tip. In 1791, Congress amended the Residence Act to approve the new site, including territory ceded by Virginia. [3]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.