Categories | Higher education |
---|---|
Frequency | Annual |
Publisher | 2009 2003-2008: Shanghai Jiao Tong University | : Shanghai Ranking Consultancy
Founded | 2003 |
Country | People's Republic of China |
Language | English and Chinese |
Website | shanghairanking.com |
Academic Ranking of World Universities | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Simplified Chinese | 世界大学学术排名 | ||||||
Traditional Chinese | 世界大學學術排名 | ||||||
|
The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU),also known as the Shanghai Ranking,is one of the annual publications of world university rankings. The league table was originally compiled and issued by Shanghai Jiao Tong University in 2003,making it the first global university ranking with multifarious indicators. [1] [2]
Since 2009,ARWU has been published and copyrighted annually by Shanghai Ranking Consultancy,an organization focusing on higher education that is not legally subordinated to any universities or government agencies. [3] In 2011,a board of international advisory consisting of scholars and policy researchers was established to provide suggestions. [4] [5] The publication currently includes global league tables for institutions as a whole and for a selection of individual subjects,alongside independent regional Greater China Ranking and Macedonian HEIs Ranking.
ARWU is regarded as one of the three most influential and widely observed university rankings,alongside QS World University Rankings and Times Higher Education World University Rankings . [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] It has received positive feedback for its objectivity and methodology, [10] [11] [12] but draws wide criticism as it fails to adjust for the size of the institution,and thus larger institutions tend to rank above smaller ones. [9] [13] [14]
Criterion | Indicator | Code | Weighting | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quality of education | Alumni as Nobel laureates &Fields Medalists | Alumni | 10% | Official websites of Nobel Laureates &Fields Medalists [Note 1] |
Quality of faculty | Staff as Nobel Laureates &Fields Medalists | Award | 20% | Official websites of Nobel Laureates &Fields Medalists [Note 1] |
Highly cited researchers in 21 broad subject categories | HiCi | 20% | Thomson Reuters' survey of highly cited researchers [Note 1] | |
Research output | Papers published in Nature and Science [* 1] | N&S | 20% | Citation index |
Papers indexed in Science Citation Index-expanded and Social Science Citation Index | PUB | 20% | ||
Per capita performance | Per capita academic performance of an institution | PCP | 10% | – |
|
EU Research Headlines reported the ARWU's work on 31 December 2003:"The universities were carefully evaluated using several indicators of research performance." [16] A survey on higher education published by The Economist in 2005 commented ARWU as "the most widely used annual ranking of the world's research universities." [17] In 2010, The Chronicle of Higher Education called ARWU "the best-known and most influential global ranking of universities" [18] and Philip G. Altbach named ARWU's 'consistency,clarity of purpose,and transparency' as significant strengths. [19] University of Oxford Chancellor Chris Patten has said "the methodology looks fairly solid ... it looks like a pretty good stab at a fair comparison." [20] While ARWU has originated in China,the ranking have been praised for being unbiased towards Asian institutions,especially Chinese institutions. [21]
The ranking has been criticised for "relying too much on award factors" thus undermining the importance of quality of instruction and humanities. [9] [22] [23] [24] A 2007 paper published in the journal Scientometrics found that the results from the Shanghai rankings could not be reproduced from raw data using the method described by Liu and Cheng. [25] A 2013 paper in the same journal finally showed how the Shanghai ranking results could be reproduced. [26] In a report from April 2009,J-C. Billaut,D. Bouyssou and Ph. Vincke analyse how the ARWU works,using their insights as specialists of Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). Their main conclusions are that the criteria used are not relevant;that the aggregation methodology has a number of major problems;and that insufficient attention has been paid to fundamental choices of criteria. [27]
The ARWU researchers themselves,N.C. Liu and Y. Cheng,think that the quality of universities cannot be precisely measured by mere numbers and any ranking must be controversial. They suggest that university and college rankings should be used with caution and their methodologies must be understood clearly before reporting or using the results. ARWU has been criticised by the European Commission as well as some EU member states for "favour[ing] Anglo-Saxon higher education institutions". For instance,ARWU is repeatedly criticised in France,where it triggers an annual controversy,focusing on its ill-adapted character to the French academic system [28] [29] and the unreasonable weight given to research often performed decades ago. [30] It is also criticised in France for its use as a motivation for merging universities into larger ones. [31]
Several methods for ranking universities were analyzed. [32] Many scholars proposed developing new methodologies for global university rankings,expressing concerns about bias against universities in the Arab region within current ranking systems. [33] They emphasized the need to adjust the weighting of indicators to account for overlooked institutional differences. [32] [34] [35]
Indeed,a further criticism has been that the metrics used are not independent of university size,e.g. number of publications or award winners will mechanically add as universities are grouped,independently of research (or teaching) quality;thus a merger between two equally-ranked institutions will significantly increase the merged institutions' score and give it a higher ranking,without any change in quality. [14]
There are two categories in ARWU's disciplinary rankings:broad subject fields and specific subjects. The methodology is similar to that adopted in the overall table,including award factors,paper citation,and the number of highly cited scholars. [36]
Considering the development of specific areas, two independent regional league tables with different methodologies were launched – Ranking of Top Universities in Greater China and Best Chinese Universities Ranking.
Best Chinese Universities Ranking was first released in 2015. [37] Ranking of Top Universities in Greater China was first released in 2011. [38]
Criterion | Indicator | Weight |
---|---|---|
Education | Percentage of graduate students | 5% |
Percentage of non-local students | 5% | |
Ratio of academic staff to students | 5% | |
Doctoral degrees awarded | 10% | |
Alumni as Nobel Laureates & Fields Medalists | 10% | |
Research | Annual research income | 5% |
Nature & Science Papers | 10% | |
SCIE & SSCI papers | 10% | |
International patents | 10% | |
Faculty | Percentage of academic staff with a doctoral degree | 5% |
Staff as Nobel Laureates and Fields Medalists | 10% | |
Highly cited researchers | 10% | |
Resources | Annual budget | 5% |
The South China University of Technology (SCUT) is a public university in Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. It is affiliated with the Ministry of Education and co-sponsored with the Guangdong Provincial People's Government. The university is part of Project 211, Project 985, and the Double First-Class Construction.
College and university rankings order higher education institutions based on various criteria, with factors differing depending on the specific ranking system. These rankings can be conducted at the national or international level, assessing institutions within a single country, within a specific geographical region, or worldwide. Rankings are typically conducted by magazines, newspapers, websites, governments, or academics.
Hunan University is a public university in Yuelu, Changsha, Hunan, China. It is affiliated with the Ministry of Education. The university is part of Project 211, Project 985, and the Double First-Class Construction.
Three national rankings of universities in the United Kingdom are published annually, by The Complete University Guide, The Guardian and jointly by The Times and The Sunday Times. Rankings have also been produced in the past by The Daily Telegraph and Financial Times. UK Universities also rank highly in global university rankings with 8 UK Universities ranking in the top 100 of all three major global rankings as of 2023/24: QS World University Rankings, Times Higher Education World University Rankings and Academic Ranking of World Universities.
The University of Science and Technology Beijing is a public university in Haidian, Beijing, China. It is affiliated with the Ministry of Education. The university is part of Project 211 and the Double First-Class Construction. The university was formerly known as Beijing Steel and Iron Institute (北京钢铁学院) before 1988.
China Agricultural University (CAU) is a public university in Haidian, Beijing, China. The university is affiliated with the Ministry of Education of China. It is part of Project 211, Project 985, and the Double First-Class Construction.
The University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) is a public university in Hefei, China. It is affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and co-funded by the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Ministry of Education of China, and the Anhui Provincial Government. It is part of Project 211, Project 985, and the Double First-Class Construction.
A research university or a research-intensive university is a university that is committed to research as a central part of its mission. They are "the key sites of knowledge production", along with "intergenerational knowledge transfer and the certification of new knowledge" through the awarding of doctoral degrees, and continue to be "the very center of scientific productivity". They can be public or private, and often have well-known brand names.
Curtin University Malaysia is the Malaysian campus of Curtin University, a public university based in Australia. It is the university's largest campus outside of Australia with a total area of 1,200-hectare (3,000-acre) comprising academic and residential blocks. It offers undergraduate and postgraduate programs in various fields of commerce, engineering, computational sciences, humanities and health sciences. It also offers foundational courses and a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) among other higher degree by research programs. It is named after John Curtin, a prominent Prime Minister of Australia during World War II from 1941 to 1945.
The University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC) is a public university in Chengdu, Sichuan, China. Founded in 1956 by the instruction of then Premier Zhou Enlai, the university is affiliated with the Ministry of Education of China. It is co-sponsored by the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Sichuan Provincial Government, and the Chengdu Municipal Government. The university is part of Project 211, Project 985, and the Double First-Class Construction.
The Times Higher Education World University Rankings, often referred to as the THE Rankings, is the annual publication of university rankings by the Times Higher Education magazine. The publisher had collaborated with Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) to publish the joint THE-QS World University Rankings from 2004 to 2009 before it turned to Thomson Reuters for a new ranking system from 2010 to 2013. In 2014, the magazine signed an agreement with Elsevier to provide it with the data used in compiling its annual rankings.
The QS World University Rankings is a portfolio of comparative college and university rankings compiled by Quacquarelli Symonds, a higher education analytics firm. Its first and earliest edition was published in collaboration with Times Higher Education (THE) magazine as Times Higher Education–QS World University Rankings, inaugurated in 2004 to provide an independent source of comparative data about university performance. In 2009, the two organizations parted ways to produce independent university rankings, the QS World University Rankings and THE World University Rankings.
Hierarchical lists that rank universities are regularly published by the popular press. Intended originally as a marketing or a benchmarking tool, university rankings have become apart of many countries research evaluation and policy initiatives. These different tables attempt to fulfill a demand for information and transparency. However, rankings influence evaluation choices and distort higher education policies. List producers allow well remunerated vice-chancellors to claim a top spot for their university in an educational league. These ranking, the publishers claim, are determined by quantitative indicators. Published research suggests otherwise, rankings are re-shaping public education and harming the academic project. According to an Independent Expert Group (IEG), convened by the United Nations University International Institute for Global Health, Global university rankings are
Curtin Mauritius is the Mauritian campus of Curtin University, a public university in Australia. It offers undergraduate and postgraduate degree programs in healthcare, information technology, commerce, design and communications. Curtin University is named after John Curtin, a prominent Prime Minister of Australia during World War II from 1941 to 1945, and is the largest university in the state of Western Australia with 58,607 students globally in 2022. It is the only Australian university campus in Africa and was formally opened on 3 May 2018 by Pravind Jugnauth, the prime minister of Mauritius.
Guangzhou Medical University is a municipal public medical university in Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. It is affiliated with the City of Guangzhou and funded by the municipal government. The university is part of the Double First-Class Construction.
Higher education in the Arab world is non-compulsory, formal education that occurs after secondary education in the twenty-two Arab states. The landscape of higher education in the Arab world is characterized by its dynamic evolution, reflecting the region's diverse cultural and socio-economic contexts across 22 countries in the Middle East and North Africa. From its origins in ancient centers of learning to the modern institutions shaping intellectual discourse today, the sector has undergone significant transformations throughout history.
The University Ranking by Academic Performance (URAP) is a university ranking developed by the Informatics Institute of Middle East Technical University. Since 2010, it has been publishing annual national and global college and university rankings for top 2000 institutions. The scientometrics measurement of URAP is based on data obtained from the Institute for Scientific Information via Web of Science and inCites. For global rankings, URAP employs indicators of research performance including the number of articles, citation, total documents, article impact total, citation impact total, and international collaboration. In addition to global rankings, URAP publishes regional rankings for universities in Turkey using additional indicators such as the number of students and faculty members obtained from Center of Measuring, Selection and Placement ÖSYM.
As of 2020, China had the world's second-highest number of top universities in several most cited international rankings including the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), the U.S. News & World Report Best Global University Ranking, the Center for World University Rankings (CWUR), the Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities and the Three University Missions Ranking.
Capital Medical University is a municipal public university in Beijing, China. It is affiliated with the City of Beijing, and co-funded by the Beijing Municipal People's Government, the National Health Commission, and the Ministry of Education.
The first international rankings, the Academic Ranking of World Universities or Shanghai Rankings
Since 2009 the Academic Ranking of World Universities has been published and copyrighted by ShanghaiRanking Consultancy.
France's higher education minister travelled to Jiaotong University's suburban campus last month to discuss the rankings, the Norwegian education minister came last year and the Danish minister is due to visit next month.; The idea for the rankings was born in 1998, when Beijing decreed China needed several world-leading universities.
Those two, as well as Shanghai Jiao Tong University, produce the most influential international university rankings out there
There are currently three major international rankings that receive widespread commentary: The Academic World Ranking of Universities, the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education Rankings.
The major international rankings have appeared in recent months — the Academic Ranking of World Universities, the QS World University Rankings, and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE).
ARWU presents a further data issue. Whereas in the case of the other rankings the results are adjusted to take account of the size of institutions, hardly any such adjustment is made by ARWU. So there is a distortion in favour of large institutions. If two institutions were to merge, the very fact of merger would mean that the merged institution would do nearly twice as well as either of the individual institutions prior to merger, although nothing else had changed.
It is no accident that the most widely used annual ranking of the world's research universities, the Shanghai index, is produced by a Chinese university.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University, which produces the best-known and most influential global ranking of universities...
Nonetheless, AWRU's consistency, clarity of purpose, and transparency are significant advantages.
It is a remarkably stable list, relying on long-term factors such as the number of Nobel Prize-winners a university has produced, and number of articles published in Nature and Science journals. But with this narrow focus comes drawbacks. China's priority was for its universities to 'catch up' on hard scientific research. So if you're looking for raw research power, it's the list for you. If you're a humanities student, or more interested in teaching quality? Not so much.