Agelenopsis pennsylvanica

Last updated

Agelenopsis pennsylvanica
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Chelicerata
Class: Arachnida
Order: Araneae
Infraorder: Araneomorphae
Family: Agelenidae
Genus: Agelenopsis
Species:
A. pennsylvanica
Binomial name
Agelenopsis pennsylvanica
(C. L. Koch, 1843)

Agelenopsis pennsylvanica, commonly known as the Pennsylvania funnel-web spider or the Pennsylvania grass spider, is a species of spider in the family Agelenidae. The common name comes from the place that it was described, Pennsylvania, and the funnel shape of its web. [1] [2] Its closest relative is Agelenopsis potteri . [1]

Contents

Agelenopsis pennsylvanica lives primarily as a solitary spider across the United States, having been found in at least 21 different states. It is an ambush predator, sitting and waiting for prey in its funnel-shaped web. In this species, the female commonly cannibalizes the male during mating. This small species has been used to study pre-copulatory cannibalism, boldness, aggressive foraging behavior, and the influence of microbes in the reproductive cycle and mating behavior.

Description

Coloring

The coloration of A. pennsylvanica is more visible in its carapace. The carapace has dark markings that are often faded. The sternum is typically a yellow-orange color with a large dark V-shaped mark, which at the posterior point is black; in darker individuals, the sternum is all black. The abdomen follows the same pattern described above, but this is somewhat obscured on dark individuals; sides speckled, venter pales on sides, broad median area dusky black. [3]

Size

The bodies of females are 9 to 14 mm long, while those of males are 7 to 12 mm long. The body size of A. pennsylvanica is extremely variable, particularly in females, ranging from 6.70 to 17.00 mm. [3] Eye size is unequal in Agelenopsis: the anterior median eyes are the largest while the posterior median are the smallest. The anterior eyes are less than a radius apart while the posterior eyes are equidistant, posterior median eyes are closer to each other than to the side eyes, usually less than a diameter apart. [3] The fang groove of chelicerae has 3 or 4 teeth on the hind margin. Hind spinnerets with an apical segment about twice as long as a basal segment. [3] The epigynum of A. pennsylvanica has a deep transverse opening with a complex internal structure. [3] The fertilization duct in this spider genus is long and slender, and coils around the neck of the bursa one and a half to two and a half times before opening the oviduct. [3] The males' palpus is a single large lobed process on the ectal side of the tibia. [3]

Females

The adult female Pennsylvania funnel-web spider has an overall length from 9.35 to 14.00 mm. Its carapace width is around 2.38 to 4.88 mm by 1.32 to 2.65 mm at its widest and narrowest points, respectively. [1] Female spiders of this species have a skull-shape bursa opening with spermathecae tending to nestle one above the other rather than positioned side by side; this whole structure is part of the female's genital region. [1] In females, the first and fourth tibia-patella lengths range from 3.70 to 8.00 mm and 4.10 to 8.35 mm, respectively. [3]

Males

The length of an adult male can range from 7.64 to 12.82 mm, while its carapace is 2.55 to 4.50 mm wide at its widest point and 1.54 to 2.25 mm at its narrowest point. [1] The male of this species distinguishes itself from other males of the genus by its coiling embolus. [1] The male's embolus makes a full circle with a pointed tip positioned perpendicular to cymbium; the cymbium is a feature of the palpal bulb characteristic of the male's pedipalp. [1] The length of the first tibia-patella in males ranges from 5.70 to 9.00 mm while the length of the fourth tibia-patella ranges from 6.00 to 9.00 mm.

Distribution and habitat

Agelenopsis pennsylvanica in its open grassy habitat Grass Spider - Agelenopsis , Pocahontas State Park, Chesterfield, Virginia.jpg
Agelenopsis pennsylvanica in its open grassy habitat
Agelenopsis pennsylvanica and its web Grass Spider DGER.jpg
Agelenopsis pennsylvanica and its web

Distribution

A. pennsylvanica is widespread across the United States, in the states of Colorado, Connecticut, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, and West Virginia. [1] However, it has been reported to be most common from New England and Great Lakes states, westward into Nebraska and eastern Colorado, south to Arkansas, Mississippi, and northern Georgia, with disjunct populations in Washington and Oregon. [4]

Habitat

This species is usually found in open grassy habitats. [5] It is believed that this species’ range is correlated with areas of high-water availability. In this type of ecosystem (floodplains forest and habitat near to bodies of water), spiders of this species are more common, indicating that humidity is important for its distribution. [6]

Diet and feeding behavior

Diet

Adult Agelenopsis pennsylvanica spiders feed on a variety of insects, particularly, hemipterans (true bugs), homopterans (Homoptera, a suborder of Hemiptera), coleopterans (beetles), hymenopterans (bees, ants, wasps and sawflies), dipterans (true flies), and orthopterans (grasshoppers, locusts and crickets). [6]

Feeding behavior

When the spider is on its web, it sits and waits at the entrance of their funnel, using high-velocity movements to subdue prey that make contact with their webs. After the prey fall into the web, the spider runs out to capture the prey. [2] [7]

Reproduction and life cycle

This funnel-web spider develops personality traits. Boldness and foraging aggression in juvenile stages of development can be observed in tests. Boldness and aggressive behaviors are correlated with the penultimate instar stage of juvenile development in wild A. pennsylvanica spiders, but there is no correlation when the juveniles are reared in the laboratory. [2] It has also been found that the boldness and foraging aggressiveness behaviors of juvenile spiders that are field-caught are a phenotypic plasticity response, which is driven by the environmental conditions where they live and that do not exist in a laboratory. The boldness and foraging aggressiveness behavior occur only under particular environmental conditions. This behavior is not correlated with selection. [2]

Courtship ritual

In the species' courtship ritual, the male traverses the female's web, tapping the silk as to signal his presence. He then moves slowly toward the female, at which point he takes hold of her and initiates courtship. [8] The terminal insertion of the copulation ritual involves the male cleaning his palpi and walking away from the cataleptic female. The male then runs for a few seconds, stopping to clean his emboli. [9] Once the female awakens, she begins to groom herself by drawing her legs between her chelicerae and brushing them over her body. [9]

Mating

A. pennsylvanica reaches its sexual maturity from late August to September. [4] Females produced egg sacs in October and November and stay with them until they die. [4] The egg sacs of A. pennsylvanica resemble the Agelenopsis naevia eggsacs – a large conical egg sac, in which the egg mass is enclosed in a thin, silk sac covered by a substantial layer of debris encased in silk (the eggs are still susceptible to parasites). The number of eggs in an egg sac is highly variable from 18 to 236 eggs. [9] In A. pennsylvanica several females are usually found under tree bark such that the egg masses were touching each other or even overlapping. [10] [11]

Interspecies mating

It has been suggested that A. pennsylvanica and A. oklahoma could potentially engage in interspecific copulation. [9] This idea was supported for the following reasons: 1) both species attain their sexual maturity during the same period; 2) even though A. oklahoma is smaller than A. pennsylvanica, individuals of the same size have the potential to copulate; 3) both species have similar color patterns and morphologies; 4) both species have similar copulatory behavior patterns; and 5) morphologically speaking, there are no mechanical incompatibilities between these two species to prevent cross mating. [9] However, there is no evidence that interspecific mating between A. pennsylvanica and A. oklahoma actually occurs. [9] Both species display a mutual indifference toward each other, and in few cases, one attacks the other, which usually culminats in the death and consumption of one of the spiders. [9] Mechanical incompatibilities of A. pennsylvanica males may prevent them from successfully mating with females of some other agelenopsid species; this mechanism is termed the "lock-and-key" concept. [9]

Sexual cannibalism

Sexual cannibalism is an extreme case of sexual conflict in nature because one of the parties loses its reproductive potential. The females and her offspring of this species benefit when a cannibalistic behavior takes place during copulation. [12] Particularly, the eggs produced by females that sexually cannibalize the male are heavier and have a higher hatching success than those eggs laid by females that did not cannibalize their mate. [12] Studies have shown that females of this species that attacked their prey more rapidly are more likely to cannibalize their first male before copulation. This was found to be especially true of those females that spent long periods of time with no food. [12] The results of this study suggest that sexual cannibalism in females is caused by general aggressiveness and by their hunger state. [12] Aggressive behavior thus favors the reproductive performance of the females. Research has shown that the authors found that females were approached by zero to three males during their two to three weeks of the reproductive season. In this spider species cannibalism has two major advantages for the female: 1) improved reproductive output and fecundity; and 2) increased attractiveness to males. [13]

In 2013, Kralj-Fišer and colleagues studied the aggressive spillover hypothesis (ASH) and its involvement in pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism. [14] The authors argued that ASH “posits that pre-copulatory cannibalism represents a spillover of female aggressiveness from the juvenile foraging context, when aggressiveness is advantageous, to the adult context, when aggressiveness may be non-adaptive or maladaptive”. [14] They found that in A. pennsylvanica the pre-copulatory cannibalism cannot be explained by ASH alone. Cannibalism occurred in 36% of all the virgin females, but none of the females killed two males in succession – they killed the first male and copulated with the second. [14] This result, in conjunction with Berning and colleagues’ findings (i.e., the aggressiveness of females increase with starvation) suggests that pre-copulatory cannibalism is the result of both – ASH and the foraging strategy. [14] Additionally, Kralj-Fišer and colleagues found that virgin female spiders that consumed the first potential mate prior to copulation, exhibited increased reproductive success: “they gleaned more offspring from heavier egg sacs”. [14] This demonstrates that pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism has adaptive consequences that are the result of multiple mechanisms acting in concert. [14]

Sexual coevolution in males

The female's receptivity to male mates depends upon her temperament. More aggressive females are more likely to cannibalize a potential mate. [13] The male uses his pedipalps to transfer the sperm to the females. Also, the male uses his pedipalps during the courtship stridulation or as a visual signal for other spiders. [13] After courtship, a key part of the mating sequence called catalepsi occurs. In catalepsis, the male subdues the female with pheromones to induce a quiescent state in the female before copulation. [13] When mating is finished, the male departs the web before the female awakens to avoid sexual cannibalism. [13] Male spiders have been shown to be more attracted to females that have already eaten another male. As females typically eat only one male, this strategy may aid male survival. [15]

Web

Web type

All members of the Agelenopsis genus make a funnel-shaped web, as their common name states. The web of this spider is usually found on the ground, in understory vegetation and trees in the forest, and in old field lawns. In some seasons, it is very common in and around houses. [4]

Prey capture techniques

These funnel-webs are composed of two parts: 1) a non-sticky sensory sheet used to sense the prey; and 2) a funnel retreat, [2] in which they sit and wait at the entrance of their funnel for prey to fall into the trap. [2]

Construction

The funnel web of this spider is a concave silk sheet with a variable number of aerial threads above, designed to capture flying insects and anchor the web to surrounding vegetation. [4] This kind of web usually has two ends: on one edge is an extended funnel which terminates in a sheltered location, while at the other end of the web the spider is located with the first two pairs of legs resting in the nest. This enables the spider to quickly react to a potential predator or prey. [6] Members of the genus Agelenopsis rely on high burst speeds to capture prey, thus capitalizing on foraging opportunities. [16] [17] If this high burst is compromised – as would be expected from pathogenic infection – the locomotor performance ability of this spider is going to be reduced. This can result in reduction of the spider's ability to forage and defend their territory from intruding conspecifics. [18]

Enemies

Predators

This species has been found in other spiders’ webs such as Parasteatoda tepidariorum (the Common house spider) and Phidippus audax (the Bold jumper). [6]

Mutualism with microbes

Microbes in mating

Environmental microbes have been found to play a critical role in courtship behavior, female survival, and mating dynamics of A. pennsylvanica. [13] During copulation, it is possible for the male to transmit environmental microbes to the female via the seminal fluid, therefore, copulation can alter the composition of the female microbiota. [13] In a study by Spicer and colleagues in 2019, [13] the authors found that when either the male or female of A. pennsylvanica is exposed to environmental microbes, their mating behavior, fecundity, and survivorship are altered. This study observed that when females were exposed to bacteria, males took four times longer to begin courtship and males began courtship sooner with aggressive females once they were paired with them. When males were exposed to bacteria, their mating females were observed to experience reduced survival. Additionally, courtship was not altered in those males and females that were exposed to antibiotics. [13] Two non-mutually exclusive hypotheses to explain the delay in courtship behavior when females are exposed to bacteria were suggested: 1) males may detect the bacterial load of their partner and adjust their behavior, or 2) females may reduce their sexual receptivity when they perceive an increase in their bacterial load, delaying courtship initiation by males. However, it is thought that males are more likely to initiate the courtship process based on assessments of female receptivity. In the particular case in which the males initiate courtship more quickly when the females are more aggressive and have been exposed to bacteria, the authors suggest that males minimized the time that they were exposed to the female to avoid a possible cannibalistic event, and therefore survived to reproduce once again. [13]

Microbe Studies

Even though A. pennsylvanica is known for its solitary behavior, spiders can share the cuticular microbiota via a shared environment (e.g., silk or soil) or during interaction with conspecifics (e.g., antagonistic interaction). [19] Parks and colleagues study the relationship between the grass species A. pennsylvanica and bacteria collected from their cuticles in situ . [19] They found that exposure to Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus decrease the foraging aggressiveness of spiders toward prey in their web. [19]

Parks and colleagues focused their research on three host behavioral traits: boldness, aggressiveness, and activity level. They found that the cuticular microbiota alters the behavior of the spider. Consequently, there was no evidence to suggest that cuticular bacterial load was harmful to spiders, at least in terms of survival rates. [19] 9 bacteria collected from spiders’ cuticles were common environmental bacteria found in soil, water, or plant surfaces, which can be easily acquired when the spider is moving around their habitat, during dispersal, web construction, foraging, and mating. [19] Two pathogenic cuticular bacteria were found: 1) Serratia marcescens is widespread in arthropods and was found in two spiders, and 2) Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found in two spiders, as well as having confirmed pathogenicity in wolf spiders. [19] [20] Rochel Gilbert and George W. Uetz in 2016 found that Pseudomonas aeruginosa was horizontally transmitted during mating. [21] This finding, along with Parks and colleagues finding, suggest that the contact between conspecifics during mating, parental care, or territorial interactions drives the transmission of pathogenic and benign environmental microbes among, and between spiders and the ecosystem. [19] [21]

Additionally, Parks and colleagues found that two common soil bacteria – D. nishinomiyaensis and S. saprophyticus – were associated with over a 10-fold decrease in spiders’ foraging aggressiveness toward prey. [19] Spiders that were exposed to these two bacteria took 60 seconds longer to attack their prey. [19] The mechanism used by these bacteria that causes a delay in spider predatory behavior is still unknown. However, the reduction in foraging aggressiveness can have fitness consequences for the individual in situ. Individuals infected with these bacteria are less likely to capture prey. [19] The bodily entrance pathway for this cuticular bacteria could leave the spider vulnerable with a compromised immune system. [19]

Physiology

In 1976, James E. Carrel and R. D. Heathcote studied the heart rate in spiders and how it was influenced by body size and foraging energetics. [22] In spiders, the heart is sensitive to locomotory activity, unlike other organisms. The blood serves both mechanical and respiratory functions. Blood is used as a hydrostatic fluid to extend the spider's appendages – compounded by extensor muscles in some leg joints. [22] The antagonistic musculature common in other groups (e.g., insect, crustaceans, and vertebrates) is incomplete in spiders. Spiders present a neurogenic heartbeat. Understanding the relationship between the heartbeat and the size of the spider may help to explain their predatory or sedentary behavior. [22] James E. Carrel and R. D. Heathcote found that in web weaver spiders – Filistata hibernalis , Argiope aurantia , Eriophora sp., Neoscona arabesca , and Agelenopsis pennsylvanica – there is a negative relationship between body weight and heart rate. These spiders weigh as much as jumping spiders, but their heart rates resemble the tarantula's heart rate. [22] This suggests that there is an energy-conserving adaptation in which these spiders invest little effort in prey capture and, consequently, feed only occasionally. [22]

Venom

McKeown and colleagues study the bite of different spider species in Oregon (USA) to understand the harm that the venom could have on humans. [23] The researchers used verified spider bites to determine the symptoms of bites by A. pennsylvanica. [23] During experimentation, patients were told to place the spider that had bit them in a container and subsequently, to send it to the Oregon Poison Control Center. The patients were contacted by phone during the next 1 to 3 weeks after the bites occurred, looking for symptoms. [23] The bites from "A. pennsylvanica" were determined to cause itching, swelling, and redness in the area that was bitten, in some cases some patients presented back pain. [23] The symptoms from bites from A. pennsylvanica can last from 1 day up to 10 days. [23]

Related Research Articles

<i>Agelenopsis</i> Genus of spiders

Agelenopsis, commonly known as the American grass spiders, is a genus of funnel weavers described by C.G. Giebel in 1869. They weave sheet webs that have a funnel shelter on one edge. The web is not sticky, but these spiders make up for that by running very rapidly. The larger specimens can grow to about 19 mm in body length. They may be recognized by the arrangement of their eight eyes into three rows. The top row has two eyes, the middle row has four eyes, and the bottom row has two eyes. They have two prominent hind spinnerets, somewhat indistinct bands on their legs, and two dark bands running down either side of the cephalothorax.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bowl and doily spider</span> Species of spider

The bowl and doily spider is a species of sheet weaver found in North and Central America. It is a small spider, about 4 mm (0.16 in) long, that weaves a fairly complex and unique sheet web system consisting of an inverted dome shaped web, or "bowl," suspended above a horizontal sheet web, or "doily", hence its common name. The spider hangs from the underside of the "bowl", and bites through the web small flies, gnats and other small insects that fall down into the non-sticky webbing. The webs are commonly seen in weedy fields and in shrubs, and may often contain both a male and a female spider in late summer—like many linyphiids, Frontinella males and females may cohabitate for some time. Males exhibit competition for female mates both by fighting and sperm competition. Uniquely, these spiders exhibit behavioral thermoregulation and have lengthened circadian rhythms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Raft spider</span> Species of spider

The raft spider, scientific name Dolomedes fimbriatus, is a large semi-aquatic spider of the family Pisauridae found throughout north-western and central Europe. It is one of only two species of the genus Dolomedes found in Europe, the other being the slightly larger Dolomedesplantarius which is endangered in the UK.

<i>Latrodectus hesperus</i> Species of spider

Latrodectus hesperus, the western black widow spider or western widow, is a venomous spider species found in western regions of North America. The female's body is 14–16 mm in length and is black, often with an hourglass-shaped red mark on the lower abdomen. This "hourglass" mark can be yellow, and on rare occasions, white. The male of the species is around half this length and generally a tan color with lighter striping on the abdomen. The population was previously described as a subspecies of Latrodectus mactans and it is closely related to the northern species Latrodectus variolus. The species, as with others of the genus, build irregular or "messy" webs: unlike the spiral webs or the tunnel-shaped webs of other spiders, the strands of a Latrodectus web have no apparent organization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spider cannibalism</span> Spiders consuming all or part of another individual of the same species as food

Spider cannibalism is the act of a spider consuming all or part of another individual of the same species as food. It is most commonly seen as an example of female sexual cannibalism where a female spider kills and eats a male before, during, or after copulation. Cases of non-sexual cannibalism or male cannibalism of females both occur but are notably rare.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual cannibalism</span> Practice of animals eating their own mating partners

Sexual cannibalism is when an animal, usually the female, cannibalizes its mate prior to, during, or after copulation. It is a trait observed in many arachnid orders, several insect and crustacean clades, gastropods, and some snake species. Several hypotheses to explain this seemingly paradoxical behavior have been proposed. The adaptive foraging hypothesis, aggressive spillover hypothesis and mistaken identity hypothesis are among the proposed hypotheses to explain how sexual cannibalism evolved. This behavior is believed to have evolved as a manifestation of sexual conflict, occurring when the reproductive interests of males and females differ. In many species that exhibit sexual cannibalism, the female consumes the male upon detection. Females of cannibalistic species are generally hostile and unwilling to mate; thus many males of these species have developed adaptive behaviors to counteract female aggression.

<i>Trichonephila plumipes</i> Species of spider

Trichonephila plumipes, the Pacific golden orb weaver, is a species of spider found in Australia, Indonesia and some Pacific Islands, which exhibits extreme sexual dimorphism through its sexual cannibalism behavior. It is sometimes called the tiger spider due to its markings which look similar to a tiger. This species was formerly called Nephila plumipes. As with other spiders from the genus Nephila, these spiders have a distinct golden web.

<i>Agelenopsis aperta</i> Species of spider

Agelenopsis aperta, also known as the desert grass spider or funnel-web spider, is a species of spider belonging to the family Agelenidae and the genus Agelenopsis. It is found in dry and arid regions across the southern United States and into northwestern Mexico. Their body is about 13–18 mm long and they have relatively long legs in order to run after their prey. Desert grass spiders can withstand very low temperatures even though they do not cold harden. It constructs the characteristic funnel-shaped webs in crevices where the funnel will fit, where they wait in the tube for prey which they can run after using their long legs. They often hunt for their prey at night.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Six-spotted fishing spider</span> Species of spider

The six-spotted fishing spider is an arachnid from the nursery web spider family Pisauridae. This species is from the genus Dolomedes, or the fishing spiders. Found in wetland habitats throughout North America, these spiders are usually seen scampering along the surface of ponds and other bodies of water. They are also referred to as dock spiders because they can sometimes be witnessed quickly vanishing through the cracks of boat docks. D. triton gets its scientific name from the Greek mythological god Triton, who is the messenger of the big sea and the son of Poseidon.

Formally, a nuptial gift is a material presentation to a recipient by a donor during or in relation to sexual intercourse that is not simply gametes in order to improve the reproductive fitness of the donor. Often, such a gift will improve the fitness of the recipient as well. This definition implies neutral gifts, costly gifts and beneficial gifts regarding the fitness of the recipient.

<i>Pisaurina mira</i> Species of spider

Pisaurina mira, also known as the American nursery web spider, due to the web it raises young in, is a species of spider in the family Pisauridae. They are often mistaken for wolf spiders (Lycosidae) due to their physical resemblance. P. mira is distinguished by its unique eye arrangement of two rows. 

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual selection in spiders</span>

Sexual selection in spiders shows how sexual selection explains the evolution of phenotypic traits in spiders. Male spiders have many complex courtship rituals and have to avoid being eaten by the females, with the males of most species surviving only a few matings and consequently having short life-spans.

<i>Holocnemus pluchei</i> Species of spider

Holocnemus pluchei, commonly known as the marbled cellar spider, is a species of Pholcidae, a family commonly referred to as "cellar spiders" or "daddy long-legs". This species is distributed across the North Pacific region of the United States, as well as in parts of North Africa, Europe, and the Mediterranean. It is considered a common household spider and builds its nest in attics, basements, and eaves of houses. Although some members of the species live in solitary webs, the majority join already existing webs and migrate to new webs multiple times throughout the course of their lives. A unique feature of H. pluchei is that while in many species of spiders, stridulation commonly occurs by males during sexual encounters, in H. pluchei, females also possess stridulatory organs, and both sexes engage in stridulation.

<i>Tigrosa helluo</i> Species of spider

Tigrosa helluo, commonly known as the Wetland Giant Wolf Spider, is a species of spider belonging to the family Lycosidae, also known as wolf spiders. T. helluo was formerly known as Hogna helluo before differences between dorsal color patterns, habitat preferences, body structures, etc. were discovered. The species is native to the United States, Canada, and Mexico. It can be found across the eastern half of the United States, primarily in the Northeast and New England, and as far west as Nebraska and Kansas. T. helluo can be found in diverse habitats including woods, marshes, fields, and riparian areas. Typically, members of this species prefer to live in wetter areas as opposed to dry environments. Males tend to live for around a year and females will live for close to two years.

<i>Philodromus cespitum</i> Species of spider

Philodromus cespitum is a species of running crab spider in the family Philodromidae. It is found in North America, Europe, North Africa, and parts of the Middle East and Asia. P. cespitum is a foliage-dweller, and is the most abundant species found in European fruit orchards. It acts as a biological control by preying on orchard pests. P. cespitum is a diurnal ambush hunter and preys on aphids, insects, and occasionally competitor spider species. Males court females by tapping on the females’ bodies with their forelegs. They then insert a genital plug into the female during copulation. Unlike in many other spider species, subsequent males can mate with plugged females by removing part of the plug prior to copulation. Males discriminate among females based on virginity and plug size, and can determine these factors using the females’ draglines and plug samples.

<i>Argiope radon</i> Species of spider

Argiope radon is a species of orb web spider native to Australia. It is found in tropical areas of the Northern Territory, Western Australia and Queensland. It is commonly known as the Northern St Andrew's cross spider.

<i>Leucauge mariana</i> Species of spider

Leucauge mariana is a long-jawed orb weaver spider, native to Central America and South America. Its web building and sexual behavior have been studied extensively. Males perform several kinds of courtship behavior to induce females to copulate and to use their sperm.

Schizocosa stridulans is a sibling species of S. ocreata and S. rovneri and is part of the wolf spider family. The name of the genus comes from the epigynum structure being lycosid and having a split T excavation. This spider is well-known for its specific leg ornamentation and courtship rituals and that is how it has been differentiated from its related species. The S. stridulans take systematic steps during its courtship ritual, which involves two independent signals. More specifically, female spiders will leave silk and pheromones to communicate that they are ready to mate.

<i>Pardosa pseudoannulata</i> Species of arachnid

Pardosa pseudoannulata, a member of a group of species referred to as wolf-spiders, is a non-web-building spider belonging to the family Lycosidae. P. pseudoannulata are wandering spiders that track and ambush prey and display sexual cannibalism. They are commonly encountered in farmlands across China and other East Asian countries. Their venom has properties that helps it function as an effective insecticide, and it is, therefore, a crucial pesticide control agent.

<i>Larinia jeskovi</i> Species of arachnid

Larinia jeskovi is a species of the family of orb weaver spiders and a part of the genus Larinia. It is distributed throughout the Americas, Africa, Australia, Europe, and Asia and commonly found in wet climes such as marshes, bogs, and rainforests. Larinia jeskovi have yellow bodies with stripes and range from 5.13 to 8.70 millimeters in body length. They build their webs on plants with a small height above small bodies of waters or wetlands. After sunset and before sunrise are the typical times they hunt and build their web. Males usually occupy a female's web instead of making their own. The mating behavior is noteworthy as male spiders often mutilate external female genitalia to reduce sperm competition while female spiders resort to sexual cannibalism to counter such mechanisms. The males also follow an elaborate courtship ritual to attract the female. The bite of Larinia jeskovi is not known to be of harm to humans.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Whitman-Zai, J.; Francis, M.; Geick, M.; Cushing, P.E. (2015-04-01). "Revision and morphological phylogenetic analysis of the funnel web spider genus Agelenopsis (Araneae: Agalenidae)". The Journal of Arachnology. 49 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1636/K14-35.1. ISSN   0161-8202. S2CID   86141703.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Sweeney, K.; Gadd, R.D.H.; Hess, Z.L.; McDermott, D.R.; MacDonald, L.; Cotter, P.; Armagost, F.; Chen, J.Z.; Berning, A.W.; DiRienzo, N.; Pruitt, J.N. (2013-04-08). "Assessing the effects of rearing environment, natural selection, and developmental stage on the emergence of a behavioral syndrome". Ethology. 119 (5): 436–447. doi:10.1111/eth.12081. ISSN   1439-0310.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Chamberlin, R.V.; Ivie, W. (1999). "North American Agelenidae of the Genera Agelenopsis, Calilena, Ritalena and Tortolena". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 34 (4): 585–628. doi:10.1093/aesa/34.3.585. ISSN   1938-2901.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Guarisco, H. (2014). "The Funnel web Spider genus Agelenopsis (Araneae: Agelenidae) in Kansas". Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 177 (1–2): 79–87. doi:10.1660/062.117.0111. ISSN   1938-5420. JSTOR   24887722. S2CID   86728554.
  5. ↑ DeMarco, Alexander E. (2018). Diel Rhythmicity Found in Behavior but Not Biogenic Amine Levels in the Funnel-Web Spider Agelenopsis pennsylvanica (Araneae, Agelenidae) (MSc). East Tennessee State University.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Paison, Thomas Charles (1997). A Biogeographic Review of the Spider Genus Agelenopis (Araneae Agelenidae) (MSc). University of Tennessee - Knoxville.
  7. ↑ Riechert, S.E. (1976). "Web-site selection in the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta". Oikos. 27 (2): 311–315. doi:10.2307/3543911. ISSN   1600-0706. JSTOR   3543911.
  8. ↑ Gertsch, Willis John (1953). American spiders. New York: Van Nostrand. p. 285. ISBN   9780442226497.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Gering, Robert L. (1953). Structure and function of the genitalia in some American Agelenid spiders (PDF). Vol. 121. Washington: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections. pp. 1–84. ISBN   9780598384447.
  10. ↑ Kaston, B.J. (1986). Spiders of Connecticut. Hartford, North Carolina: State Geol & Nat Hist Survey. p. 874. ISBN   9780844405254.
  11. ↑ Matlack, M.C.; Jennings, D.T. (1977). "Cohabitation of female spiders guarding egg sacs". Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society. 50 (4): 519–522. ISSN   1937-2353. JSTOR   25082975.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Berning, A.W.; Gadd, R.D.H.; Sweeney, K.; MacDonald, L.; Eng, R.Y.Y.; Hess, Z.L.; Pruitt, J.N. (September 2012). "Sexual cannibalism is associated with female behavioural type, hunger state and increased hatching success". Animal Behaviour. 84 (3): 715–721. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.030. ISSN   0003-3472. S2CID   53191103.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Spicer, M.E.; Pruitt, J.N.; Keiser, C.N. (2019-07-29). "Spiders, microbes and sex: Bacterial exposure on copulatory organs alters mating behaviour in funnel‐web spiders". Ethology. 125 (10): 677–685. doi: 10.1111/eth.12921 . ISSN   1439-0310.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Kralj-Fišer, S.; Schneider, J.M.; Kuntner, M. (2013). "Challenging the aggressive spillover hypothesis: Is pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism a part of a behavioural syndrome?". Ethology. 119 (8): 615–623. doi:10.1111/eth.12111. ISSN   1439-0310.
  15. ↑ Pruitt, J.N.; Berning, A.W.; Cusack, B.; Shearer, T.A.; McGuick, M.; Coleman, A.; Eng, R.Y.Y; Armagost, F.; Sweeney, K.; Singh, N. (2014-03-01). "Precopulatory sexual cannibalism causes increase egg case production, hatching success, and female attractiveness to males". Ethology. 120 (5): 453–462. doi:10.1111/eth.12216. ISSN   1439-0310.
  16. ↑ Turnbull, A. (2012). "Effects of prey abundance on the development of the spider Agelenopsis potteri (Blackwall) (Araneae: Agelenidae)". The Canadian Entomologist. 97 (2): 141–147. doi:10.4039/Ent97141-2. ISSN   1918-3240. S2CID   86353822.
  17. ↑ Hedrick, A.V.; Riechert, S.E. (1989). "Genetically based variation between two spider populations in foraging behavior". Oecologia. 80 (4): 533–539. Bibcode:1989Oecol..80..533H. doi:10.1007/BF00380078. ISSN   1432-1939. PMID   28312840. S2CID   2781570.
  18. ↑ Pruitt, J.N.; Husak, J.F. (2010). "Context-dependent running speed in funnel-web spiders from divergent populations". Functional Ecology. 24 (8): 165–171. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01623.x. ISSN   1365-2435.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Parks, O.B.; Kothamasu, K.S.; Ziemba, M.J.; Benner, M.; Cristinziano, M.; Kantz, S.; Leger, D.; Li, J.; Patel, D.; Rabuse, W.; Sutton, S.; Wilson, A.; Baireddy, P.; Kamat, A.A.; Callas, M.J.; Borges, M.J.; Scalia, M.N.; Klenk, E.; Scherer, G.; Martinez, M.M.; Grubb, S.R.; Kaufmann, N.; Pruitt, J.N.; Keiser, C.N. (2018). "Exposure to cuticular bacteria can alter host behavior in a funnel-weaving spider". Current Zoology. 64 (6): 721–726. doi:10.1093/cz/zox064. ISSN   2396-9814. PMC   6280096 . PMID   30538731.
  20. ↑ Gilbert, R.; Karp, R.D.; Uetz, G.W. (2016). "Effects of juvenile infection on adult immunity and secondary sexual characters in a wolf spider". Behavioral Ecology. 27 (3): 956–954. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arv241 . ISSN   1465-7279.
  21. 1 2 Gilbert, R.; Uetz, G.W. (2016). "Courtship and male ornaments as honest indicators of immune function". Animal Behaviour. 117: 97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.04.013 . ISSN   2372-4323. S2CID   53192097.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 Carrel, J.E.; Heathcote, R.D. (1976). "Heart Rate in Spiders: Influence of Body Size and Foraging Energetics". Science. 193 (4248): 148–150. Bibcode:1976Sci...193..148C. doi:10.1126/science.935864. ISSN   1095-9203. PMID   935864.
  23. 1 2 3 4 5 McKeown, N.; Vetter, R.S.; Hendrickson, R.G. (2014). "Verified spider bites in Oregon (USA) with the intent to assess hobo spider venom toxicity". Toxicon. 84: 21–55. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.03.009. ISSN   0041-0101. PMID   24726469.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.