American gizzard shad

Last updated

American gizzard shad
American Gizzard Shad.png
American gizzard shad in the clutches of an osprey.
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Actinopterygii
Order: Clupeiformes
Family: Dorosomatidae
Genus: Dorosoma
Species:
D. cepedianum
Binomial name
Dorosoma cepedianum
(Lesueur, 1818)
GetStaticMap.aspx.png
Range within the continental United States

The American gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum), also known as the mud shad, is a member of the herring family of fish and is native to large swaths of fresh and brackish waters in the United States of America, [2] as well as portions of Quebec, Canada, and Mexico. [3] The adult has a deep body, with a silvery-green coloration above fading to plain silver below. [4] The gizzard shad commonly resides in freshwater lakes, reservoirs, rivers, and streams but can also reside in brackish waters, as it does on the Atlantic coast of the United States. Their range is across most of the continental United States, although they typically go no further north than New York and no further west than New Mexico. [2] They are a large part of many of the ecosystems they inhabit and can drive changes in phyto- and zooplankton, thereby indirectly affecting other planktivorous fishes. [5] The gizzard shad has been widely used as a food source for game fish, with varied success in management and effectiveness.

Contents

Physical description

Sketch of D. cepedianum Dorosoma cepedianum GLERL.jpg
Sketch of D. cepedianum
Dorosoma cepedianum.jpg

The gizzard shad's dorsal fin starts behind the insertion of the pelvic fins, and the last ray is greatly lengthened. They have a long anal fin, with 25 to 36 long soft rays on the fin. [6] The mouth of the gizzard shad has a short, wide, upper jaw with a deep notch along the ventral margin, and a weak, relatively smaller, lower jaw. The mouth itself is subterminal to inferior (on the lower portion of the head), and the adults possess no teeth. [7] The gizzard shad also has 90 to 275 gill rakers along the lower limbs. [4] Their ventral (pelvic) fins are in the thoracic position, or in the chest region of the fish. The gizzard shad can range from very small size when fry to a maximum recorded length of 477 mm (18.8 in) and maximum weight of 1.56 kg (3.4 lb). [8] The average length is typically larger in northern waters, and ranges from 284 mm (11.2 in) at age three years to 399 mm (15.7 in) at age 10. [2] They have a branched lateral line system that is confined to the head and anterior body, similar to the lateral line systems of other clupeids. [9]

The gizzard shad is brown or gray dorsally, becoming whitish ventrally. [6] A humeral spot, sometimes with purple iridescence, [10] may be faintly visible posterior to the upper operculum. [6] [10] The fish is often slimy. [6]

Range and habitat

Gizzard shad have historically ranged from North Dakota in the northwest of the United States south to New Mexico in the southwest, east to Florida in the southeast, and north to 40°N latitude (they have historically been seen no farther north than the lower New York Harbor). [2] They were not seen in many of the Great Lakes until the late 1800s and early 1900s, although they are suspected to be native to Lake Erie, reaching it after the last ice age. [4] Gizzard shad typically live in lakes and reservoirs, although they can live in rivers and streams, and brackish waters. They reside in the limnetic zone, and can comprise up to 80% of fish biomass in certain lake systems. They prefer shallow lakes with muddy bottoms and relatively high turbidity. [8] This may be due in part to their breeding preferences, but it probably arises from the fact that they have lower survival rates in clear waters and waters with high vegetative cover. [11]

Diet and feeding habits

Gizzard shad are planktivorous in early life, feeding mainly on phytoplankton and zooplankton, such as periphyton, chrysophyta and rotifera, as larvae. [12] Consumptive demand of young of year fish (including larvae) can be intense enough to cause collapses in the zooplankton community, which has far-reaching effects through the ecosystem of which they are a part. [5] In midwestern USA reservoirs, where gizzard shad are often the most abundant fish (by biomass), they usually switch to diets dominated by sediment detritus during the first year of life, [13] whereas in some natural lakes they may rely heavily on zooplankton throughout their lives. [14] As zooplankton are a nutritionally superior food than detritus, if large zooplankton (e.g., Daphnia ) are available, gizzard shad probably prefer to feed on this resource. However, in many reservoirs, large zooplankton are scarce so gizzard shad rely on detritus. Gizzard shad growth rates may be lower when they feed only on detritus (compared to zooplankton), and in reservoirs they may consume more zooplankton (and less detritus) when density of conspecifics is low and the abundance of large-bodied zooplankton is high. [15] In such cases, Daphnia and other crustaceans make up a large portion of some gizzard shad diets. Sediment and sand are also ingested by the gizzard shad, which helps it digest food in its muscular gizzard. [12]

Gizzard shad feed mainly during the day, with minimal activity at night. [5] They have been observed at night in Lake Mead, Arizona congregating in schools in very shallow water two to three feet deep during the fall.[ citation needed ]

Reproduction

The start of the spawning period is typically between mid-May and early June, and is triggered by rising water temperatures. The number of eggs per individual varies between populations, but typically it is 12,500 eggs for a two-year-old and peaks at 380,000 eggs for a four-year-old. The eggs are laid in shallow water in clumps, with seemingly no pairing off occurring between individuals. They spawn during the evening and the early hours of the night, and the eggs adhere to underwater vegetation and do not receive any parental attention. Feeding begins three to four days after hatching, and most individuals are 3.3 mm long upon hatching. [8] Gizzard shad have very high fecundity and a rapid growth rate, meaning they can become a large part of an ecosystem, in terms of abundance and biomass, very quickly. [16] They are capable of hybridizing with the closely related threadfin shad (Dorosoma petenense). [2]

Fisheries management

Gizzard shad were introduced into many lake and river systems as a source of food for game fish, such as walleye, bass, and trout, because of their small size and relatively high abundance. They were thought to be easy food for game fish and could help increase the numbers of fish available, as well as decrease the pressures on prey species (such as the bluegill). [17] However, due to their rapid growth, they can quickly grow beyond the size available to many fish. They remain vulnerable to predation by piscivorous birds, such as great blue herons, as well as raccoons and other wetland predators. [18]

In addition, gizzard shad spawn in large numbers and can reach densities high enough to ensure that many of them survive past the first year, making them essentially invulnerable to fish predation. They can also be harmful exploitative competitors to other species, leading to declines in other fish species' populations. [19] Partly as a result of this, large gizzard shad are sometimes labeled as "nuisances" and "unwanted". [20] However, gizzard shad can help to control populations of zooplankton and insect larvae in productive ecosystems through their unique capabilities as predators of small organisms. [18]

Lake management

Gizzard shad can increase productivity in an ecosystem through redistribution of nutrients, particularly in their adult stages when they consume detritus in lower depths of the lake and both make them available to other predator species [15] as well as excreting them in more bioavailable forms. [21] Because of this, gizzard shad can have a strong effect on algal production even when phosphorus loading from watersheds is high, and can counteract management efforts to combat cultural eutrophication. [21]

Aquatic toxicology

Gizzard shad are important to toxicology testing for chemical products. Due to the food web dependencies and fecundity gizzard shad are somewhat the water bound version of "canary in the coal mine." [22]

Thiaminase activity

Ross JP et al (2009) [23] reported that the thiaminase activity of gizzard shad in Lake Griffin was found to be 16,409 ± 2,121 pmol/g/min. This high rate of thiaminase activity was present in most months and across a wide range of shad sizes. The thiaminase activity in gizzard shad is high enough to cause thiamine deficiency in wild alligators when shad are a major part of their . The alligator mortality between 1998 and 2003 was due to neurological impairment associated with thiamine (vitamin B1) deficiency.

Etymology

The gizzard shad is so named because it possesses a gizzard, a sack filled with rocks or sand, that aids the animal in the breakdown of consumed food. Its generic name, Dorosoma, is a reflection of the fact that, when young, the fish has a lancelet-shaped body (doro meaning lanceolate and soma meaning body). The specific name, cepedianum, is a reference to amateur French ichthyologist La Cépède.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">White bass</span> Species of fish

The white bass, silver bass, or sand bass is a freshwater fish of the temperate bass family Moronidae. commonly around 12-15 inches long. The species' main color is silver-white to pale green. Its back is dark, with white sides and belly, and with narrow dark stripes running lengthwise on its sides. It has large, rough scales and two dorsal fins. They are widely distributed across North America, inhabiting large reservoirs and rivers. When mating in the spring, they are more often found in shallow rivers, creeks, and streams. They have been introduced in some places as sport fish and also to predate on nuisance fish, such as gizzard shad. It is the state fish of Oklahoma.

<i>Daphnia</i> Genus of crustaceans

Daphnia is a genus of small planktonic crustaceans, 0.2–6.0 mm (0.01–0.24 in) in length. Daphnia are members of the order Anomopoda, and are one of the several small aquatic crustaceans commonly called water fleas because their saltatory swimming style resembles the movements of fleas. Daphnia spp. live in various aquatic environments ranging from acidic swamps to freshwater lakes and ponds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern pike</span> Species of fish

The northern pike is a species of carnivorous fish of the genus Esox (pikes). They are commonly found in moderately salty and fresh waters of the Northern Hemisphere. They are known simply as a pike in Great Britain, Ireland, most of Eastern Europe, Canada and the U.S., although in the Midwest, they may be called a Northern.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Longnose gar</span> Species of fish

The longnose gar, also known as longnose garpike or billy gar, is a ray-finned fish in the family Lepisosteidae. The genus may have been present in North America for about 100 million years. References are made to gars being a primitive group of bony fish because they have retained some primitive features, such as a spiral valve intestine, but they are not primitive in the sense of not being fully developed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lake stratification</span> Separation of water in a lake into distinct layers

Lake stratification is the tendency of lakes to form separate and distinct thermal layers during warm weather. Typically stratified lakes show three distinct layers: the epilimnion, comprising the top warm layer; the thermocline, the middle layer, whose depth may change throughout the day; and the colder hypolimnion, extending to the floor of the lake.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sauger</span> Species of fish

The sauger is a freshwater perciform fish of the family Percidae that resembles its close relative, the walleye. The species is a member of the largest vertebrate order, the Perciformes. It is the most migratory percid species in North America. Saugers have two dorsal fins; the first is spiny and the posterior dorsal fin is soft-rayed. Their paired fins are in the thoracic position and their caudal fin is truncated, which means squared off at the corners, a characteristic of the family Percidae. Another physical characteristic of saugers is their ctenoid scales, which are common in advanced fishes. Saugers have a fusiform body structure, and as a result are well adapted predatory fishes and are capable of swimming into fast currents with minimal drag on their bodies. They may be distinguished from walleyes by the distinctly spotted dorsal fin, by the lack of a white splotch on the caudal fin, by the rough skin over their gills, and by their generally more brassy color, or darker color in some regions. The typical sauger is 300 to 400 g in weight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bait fish</span> Fish used as bait to attract predatory fish

Bait fish are small-sized fish caught and used by anglers as bait to attract larger predatory fish, particularly game fish. Baitfish species are typically those that are common and breed rapidly, making them easy to catch and in abundant supply.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hydrobiology</span> Science of life and life processes in water

Hydrobiology is the science of life and life processes in water. Much of modern hydrobiology can be viewed as a sub-discipline of ecology but the sphere of hydrobiology includes taxonomy, economic and industrial biology, morphology, and physiology. The one distinguishing aspect is that all fields relate to aquatic organisms. Most work is related to limnology and can be divided into lotic system ecology and lentic system ecology.

A lacustuary is a freshwater body of water where river and lake waters mix. Lacustuaries are nonmoving or "slack" water, although water in them can ebb and flow due to lake waves moving in and out, and the rising and falling of lake water levels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sacramento blackfish</span> Species of fish

The Sacramento blackfish is a species of freshwater fish in central California. A cyprinid, the blackfish is the sole member of its genus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lake ecosystem</span> Type of ecosystem

A lake ecosystem or lacustrine ecosystem includes biotic (living) plants, animals and micro-organisms, as well as abiotic (non-living) physical and chemical interactions. Lake ecosystems are a prime example of lentic ecosystems, which include ponds, lakes and wetlands, and much of this article applies to lentic ecosystems in general. Lentic ecosystems can be compared with lotic ecosystems, which involve flowing terrestrial waters such as rivers and streams. Together, these two ecosystems are examples of freshwater ecosystems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Utah chub</span> Species of fish

The Utah chub is a cyprinid fish native to western United States, where it is abundant in the upper Snake River basin and the Bonneville basin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emerald shiner</span> Species of fish

The emerald shiner is one of hundreds of small, silvery, slender fish species known as shiners. The identifying characteristic of the emerald shiner is the silvery emerald color on its sides. It can grow to 3.5 inches in length and is found across North America from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico, commonly in large, deep lakes and rivers, though sometimes in smaller bodies of water as well. It feeds on small organisms such as zooplankton and insects, congregating in large groups near the surface of the water. It is a quite common fish and is often used as a bait fish.

<i>Dorosoma</i> Genus of fishes

Dorosoma is a genus that contains five species of shads, within the family Dorosomatidae. The five species are native to the North and/or Central America, and are mostly known from fresh water, though some may reside in the waters of estuaries and bays.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Skipjack shad</span> Species of fish

The skipjack herring is a North American, migratory, fresh- and brackish water fish species in the herring family Alosidae. The name skipjack shad comes from the fact that it is commonly seen leaping out of the water while feeding. Other common names include blue herring, golden shad, river shad, Tennessee tarpon, and McKinley shad. The skipjack shad is restricted to the Gulf of Mexico drainage basins. Skipjack are found in clear to moderately turbid water in areas with flow. Because they are a migratory species, dams often impede their reproduction. Records suggest that this species was much more abundant in the Upper Mississippi River basin before it was impounded. Currently, skipjack is most abundant in the Upper Mississippi River below the mouth of the Ohio River. They are known as an "early-run" species as they migrate to spawn in the early spring.

<i>Bythotrephes longimanus</i> Spiny water flea

Bythotrephes longimanus, or the spiny water flea, is a planktonic crustacean less than 15 millimetres (0.6 in) long. It is native to fresh waters of Northern Europe and Asia, but has been accidentally introduced and widely distributed in the Great Lakes area of North America since the 1980s. Bythotrephes is typified by a long abdominal spine with several barbs which protect it from predators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forage fish</span> Small prey fish

Forage fish, also called prey fish or bait fish, are small pelagic fish that feed on planktons and other small aquatic organisms. They are in turn preyed upon by various predators including larger fish, seabirds and marine mammals, this making them keystone species in their aquatic ecosystems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Threadfin shad</span> Species of fish

The threadfin shad is a small pelagic freshwater forage fish common in lakes, large streams and reservoirs of the Southeastern United States. Like the American gizzard shad, the threadfin shad has an elongated dorsal fin, but unlike the gizzard shad, its mouth is more terminal without a projecting upper jaw. The fins of threadfin shad often have a yellowish color, especially the caudal fin. The back is grey to blue with a dark spot on the shoulder. D. petenense is more often found in moving water, and is rarely found deep in the water column. It occurs in large schools, sometimes with gizzard shad, and can be seen on the surface at dawn and dusk. The threadfin shad may reach lengths of 8 in (200 mm), but only rarely. This fish is very sensitive to changes in temperature and dissolved oxygen, and die-offs are frequent in late summer and fall, especially when water temperature drops to 42 °F. The threadfin shad is a favorite food for many game fishes, including striped bass, largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, and catfish. This fish is widely introduced throughout the United States as a forage for game fish.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Planktivore</span> Aquatic organism that feeds on planktonic food

A planktivore is an aquatic organism that feeds on planktonic food, including zooplankton and phytoplankton. Planktivorous organisms encompass a range of some of the planet's smallest to largest multicellular animals in both the present day and in the past billion years; basking sharks and copepods are just two examples of giant and microscopic organisms that feed upon plankton.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter and Paul Lakes</span> Lake in Michigan

Paul and Peter are two connected lakes located in Michigan's upper peninsula near the Wisconsin border in Vilas County (WI) and Gogebic County (MI). Paul and Peter are kettle lakes, which is a type of lake formed by glaciers. Peter Lake is larger with an area of 6.24 acres and a maximum depth of 19.6 meters while Paul Lake has an area of 4.12 acres and a maximum depth of 15 meters. The lakes are a part of the University of Notre Dame Environmental Research Center (UNDERC). The lakes, bogs, streams, and marshes of the UNDERC are located within deciduous and coniferous forests. The surrounding forest is made up mostly of sugar maple, yellow birch, and balsam fir. The two lakes are ideal for performing whole lake experiments since one lake can receive treatments while the other can remain a control. No fishing is allowed making the two connected lakes ideal for studying their fish populations. The lakes' basins are also located within the UNDERC meaning that no outside interference can occur. The lakes are dimictic, freezing in November and mixing in the fall and again partially mixing in the spring.

References

  1. NatureServe; Daniels, A. (2019). "Dorosoma cepedianum". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species . 2019: e.T191210A102894923. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-2.RLTS.T191210A102894923.en . Retrieved 27 June 2022.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Wuellner, Melissa R.; Graeb, Brian D.S.; Ward, Matthew J.; Willis, David W. (2008). "Review of Gizzard Shad Population Dynamics at the Northwestern Edge of Its Range" (PDF). American Fisheries Society Symposium. 62: 637–653. Retrieved 26 July 2022.
  3. P. Fuller; M.E. Neilson; K. Hopper (30 August 2023) [Peer reviewed on 12 April 2013]. "Dorosoma cepedianum (Lesueur, 1818)". Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database. Gainesville, Florida: U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 15 October 2023.
  4. 1 2 3 Miller, Robert Rush (1957). "Origin and Dispersal of the Alewife, Alosa Pseudoharengus, and the Gizzard Shad, Dorosoma Cepedianum, in the Great Lakes" (PDF). Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 86 (1): 97–111. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1956)86[97:OADOTA]2.0.CO;2. hdl:2027.42/141231 . Retrieved 26 July 2022.
  5. 1 2 3 Shepherd, William C.; Mills, Edward L. (1996). "Diel Feeding, Daily Food Intake, and Daphnia Consumption by Age-0 Gizzard Shad in Oneida Lake, New York". Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 125 (3): 411–421. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1996)125<0411:DFDFIA>2.3.CO;2.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Robert P. Jacobs; Eileen B. O'Donnell; Connecticut DEEP (2009). Gizzard Shad (Dorosoma cepedianum) - Native, adapted from A Pictorial Guide to Freshwater Fishes of Connecticut (2009). Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. ISBN   978-0942085150 . Retrieved 20 November 2022 via Connecticut Department of Energy & Envionrmental Protection.
  7. Hansen, Paul; Kitchell, James; Lyons, John; White, Elizabeth; Moy, Phil; Gen, Yael; Dellinger, Rich (eds.). "Fish ID: Shad, Gizzard". University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute. Retrieved 2022-07-25.
  8. 1 2 3 Williamson, Kathryn L.; Nelson, Patrick C. (1985). "Habitat suitability index models and instream flow suitability curves: Gizzard Shad" (PDF). U.S Fish and Wildlife Services Biological Reports. 82 (10.112): 1–33. Retrieved 25 July 2022.
  9. Stephens, Robert R. (1985). "The Lateral Line System of the Gizzard Shad, Dorosoma cepedianum Lesueur (Pisces: Clupeidae)". Copeia. 1985 (3): 540–556. doi:10.2307/1444742. JSTOR   1444742.
  10. 1 2 South Carolina DNR; Duane Raver (2015). "Gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum) - Native". South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. Retrieved 20 November 2022.
  11. Michaletz, Paul H.; Bonneau, Joseph L. (2005). "Age-0 Gizzard Shad Abundance is Reduced in the Presence of Macrophytes: Implications for Interactions with Bluegills". Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 134 (1): 149–159. doi:10.1577/FT04-011.1.
  12. 1 2 Morris, Christina. "Dorosoma cepedianum - Eastern gizzard shad". Animal Diversity Web .
  13. Higgins, Karen A.; Vanni, Michael J.; González, Maria J. (2006). "Detritivory and the stoichiometry of nutrient cycling by a dominant fish species in lakes of varying productivity". Oikos. 114 (3): 419–430. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14745.x. ISSN   1600-0706.
  14. Gu, B.; Schelske, C. L.; Hoyer, M. V. (1996). "Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen as indicators of diet and trophic structure of the fish community in a shallow hypereutrophic lake". Journal of Fish Biology. 49 (6): 1233–1243. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb01792.x. ISSN   1095-8649.
  15. 1 2 Schaus, Maynard H.; Vanni, Michael J.; Wissing, Thomas E. (2002). "Biomass-Dependent Diet Shifts in Omnivorous Gizzard Shad: Implications for Growth, Food Web, and Ecosystem Effects". Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 131 (1): 40–54. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.487.3857 . doi:10.1577/1548-8659(2002)131<0040:BDDSIO>2.0.CO;2.
  16. Irwin, Brian J.; DeVries, Dennis R.; Kim, Gene W. (2003). "Responses to Gizzard Shad Recovery following Selective Treatment in Walker County Lake, Alabama, 1996-1999". North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 23 (4): 1225–1237. doi:10.1577/M02-068.
  17. Zweifel, Richard D.; Hale, R. Scott; Bunnell, David B.; Bremigan, Mary T. (2009). "Hatch Timing Variations among Reservoir Gizzard Shad Populations: Implications for Stocked Sander spp. Fingerlings". North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 29 (2): 488–494. doi:10.1577/M08-141.1.
  18. 1 2 "Field Guide: Gizzard Shad". Missouri Department of Conservation. Retrieved 25 July 2022.
  19. Garvey, James E.; Stein, Roy A. (1998). "Linking Bluegill and Gizzard Shad Prey Assemblages to Growth of Age-0 Largemouth Bass in Reservoirs". Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 127 (1): 70–83. doi:10.1577/1548-8659(1998)127<0070:LBAGSP>2.0.CO;2. hdl: 1811/45408 . Retrieved 26 July 2022.
  20. "Fish Surveys". EnviroScience. 2022. Retrieved 26 July 2022.
  21. 1 2 Williamson, Tanner J.; Vanni, Michael J.; González, María J.; Renwick, William H.; Bremigan, Mary T.; Conroy, Joseph D. (2018-09-01). "The importance of nutrient supply by fish excretion and watershed streams to a eutrophic lake varies with temporal scale over 19 years". Biogeochemistry. 140 (2): 233–253. doi:10.1007/s10533-018-0490-6. ISSN   1573-515X. S2CID   104550667.
  22. Akerman, James W. (10 August 1988). "Gizzard Shad Mortalities in Bifenthrin Study Pond" (PDF). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 February 2017. Retrieved 26 July 2022.
  23. Ross JP et al (2009). Gizzard shad thiaminase activity and its effect on the thiamine status of captive american alligators Alligator mississippiensis. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 21:239-248.

[1]

  1. Ross JP et al (2009). Gizzard shad thiaminase activity and its effect on the thiamine status of captive american alligators Alligator mississippiensis. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 21:239-248.