Arkansas-class monitor

Last updated

Arkansas-Class Monitors Underway.jpg
USS Florida, Arkansas, and Nevada underway
Class overview
Builders
Operators Flag of the United States (1908-1912).svg United States Navy
Preceded by Monterey-class
Built1899–1903
In commission1902–1926
Planned4
Completed4
Retired4
Preserved0
General characteristics
Type Monitor
Displacement
  • 3,225 long tons (3,277  t) (standard)
  • 3,356 long tons (3,410 t) (full load)
Length
Beam50 ft (15 m)
Draft12 ft 6 in (3.81 m) (mean)
Installed power
Propulsion
Speed
  • 12.5 knots (23.2  km/h; 14.4  mph) (design)
  • Arkansas: 12.03 knots (22.28 km/h; 13.84 mph)
  • Nevada: 13.04 knots (24.15 km/h; 15.01 mph)
  • Florida: 12.4 knots (23.0 km/h; 14.3 mph)
  • Wyoming: 11.8 knots (21.9 km/h; 13.6 mph)
Complement13 officers 209 men
Armament
Armor

The Arkansas-class monitors were the last class of four monitors ordered for the U.S. Navy.

Contents

Design

Single turreted monitors, these ships mounted the most modern heavy guns in the US Navy at the time they were built, 12-inch (305 mm)/40 caliber guns. The Arkansas-class monitors did not see any combat during World War I and instead served as submarine tenders. Alexander C. Brown, writing in the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers Historical Transactions noted in a penetrating comment that:

Monitors found their final employment as submarine tenders in World War I for which their low freeboard hulls made them well suited. It is significant to note, however, that in this humble capacity they were ministering to the needs of that type of craft which had logically replaced them for as initially envisaged monitors were designed to combine heavy striking power with concealment and the presentation of a negligible target area

They had a displacement of 3,225 long tons (3,277  t ; 3,612 short tons ), measured 255  feet 1  inch (77.75  m ) in overall length, with a beam of 50 feet 1 inch (15.27 m) and a draft of 12 feet 6 inches (3.81 m). They were manned by a total crew of 13 officers and 209 men. [1]

Arkansas' were powered by two vertical triple expansion engines driving two screw propellers with steam generated by four steam boilers. The engines in the Arkansas' were designed to produce 2,400 indicated horsepower (1,800  kW ) with a top speed of 12.5 knots (23.2  km/h ; 14.4  mph ), however, on sea trials only Nevada had top speed over 12.5 knots, 13.04 kn (24.15 km/h; 15.01 mph), the rest came in below. The Arkansas' was designed to provide a range of 2,360 nautical miles (4,370  km ; 2,720  mi ) at 10 kn (19 km/h; 12 mph). [1]

The ships were armed with a main battery of two 12-inch/40 caliber guns, either Mark 3 or Mark 4, in a Mark 4 turret. [2] [3] [1] The secondary battery consisted of four 4-inch (102 mm)/50 caliber Mark 7 guns [4] along with three 6-pounder 57 mm (2.2 in) guns. The main belt armor was 11 in (280 mm) in the middle tapering to 5 in (130 mm) at the ends. The gun turrets were between 10 and 9 in (250 and 230 mm), with 11 to 9 in (280 to 230 mm) barbettes. The Arkansas' also had a 1.5 in (38 mm) deck. [1]

Construction

In response to increasing public pressure regarding the state of the nation's coastal defense forces and hastened by the outbreak of war with Spain, the U.S. Congress passed the Naval Appropriations Act of 1898 on May 4th, which, among many other things, authorized the appropriation of $5 million to build four new Monitors, each of which were to cost no more than $1,250,000. [5] The new ships, created for harbor defense, were designed by Chief constructor Philip Hichborn with the original plans calling for a length of 225ft and a beam of 50ft, with a displacement of 2700 tons, a coal capacity of 200 tons, and a side armor belt of 11-inch thickness. For armament, the ship was to be equipped with a main battery containing a single turret with two 12-inch guns (Hichborn balanced), and four rapid-fire breech-loading rifles, with a secondary battery consisting of three 6-pound and four 1-pound rifles. Powered by two vertical triple-expansion type engines and twin-screw propellers, the ship would have a maximum speed of 12 knots. [6]

Contractors

Bidding began for the construction of the new monitors on October 1st, with the following results, including price: [7]

Following the bidding, the Navy announced the names of the ships. [8] [9]

Criticism and Proposed Redesign

The new Monitors were met with criticism by many, as their design and armament made them no greater than any of the older navy Monitors, such as the Monterey, Monadnock, and Terror. The main complaint was the single turret, rather than a two-turret design as seen on the USS Terror. [10] [11] [12] There were also those that argued that the entire building of four ships was a waste of money, as the monitors that participated in the Spanish-American War were met with considerable criticism, most chiefly from Rear Admiral William T. Sampson who criticized the slowness of the vessels and their firing accuracy. [13] [14] [15]

In response to these criticisms, Secretary of the Navy John D. Long ordered that all construction on the new vessels be halted while the Bureau of Naval Construction met to decide on changes in early November. [12] Lewis Nixon of the Crescent Shipyard, the contractors of the USS Florida, submitted a new design for the Monitors which the Navy appears to have favored. [11] [16] [17] The final proposed changes included the following: [18]

  1. Replacing the single turret of two 12-inch guns with two turrets of two 10-inch guns in each
  2. Increasing the maximum displacement from 2700 tons to 4000 tons
  3. Increase the coal capacity from 200 tons to 400 tons
  4. Lengthening the vessels by 30ft

The Navy was confident that changes could be made to the design within the $1.25 million dollar budget set by Congress as they were surprised at how low the bids were for the four ships, with the highest contract, costing $875,000, leaving a minimum of $350,000 left over for each ship. The four ships were originally contracted at a price of $3,422,000 altogether. Throughout November the Bureau and shipbuilders discussed possible design changes, with the shipbuilders stating that their proposed changes would still go over the budget set by the Naval Apportions Act. Eventually, the two sides came to an agreement, which included the following: [18]

  1. Retention of the single turret with two 12-inch guns
  2. Increased displacement by over 500 tons
  3. Increased coal capacity
  4. Lengthening the vessels from 225ft to 255ft

In the end, the most prominent point of contention, the main armament, was kept the same with the Navy receiving, on paper, most of what they wanted asides from that. [19] Due to the new changes, the contract place of all monitors were increased by $100,000. [20]

Armor

As November drew to a close, it was reported that the new Monitors would be armored with Krupp Steel, which would be a first for a vessel in the U.S. Navy. [21] However, Congress only authorized a maximum payment of $400 dollars a ton for armor, a price that was too low to purchase Krupp Steel. In June the Navy would instead outfit the ships with Harvey armor instead, which they purchased from both Carnegie Steel and Bethlehem Ironworks. [22] [23] [24] Contracts for this armor were made in August and September 1899, totaling 2,152 tons. The armor was of great want to the Navy in a timely manner and did not wish to have any delays. [25]

Connecticut Renaming

The same year it was launched, Connecticut would undergo a change that had been lobbied for since 1898, though not in its design but rather its name. The state of Connecticut protested that a small monitor was named after the state rather than a Battleship, as had been the case with Rhode Island . The Navy eventually relented, and the name was removed, with the former Connecticut being referred to as "Monitor No. 8" until another candidate was chosen. Oklahoma and Arizona both offered up their names before it eventually went to Nevada. [26] [27] [28]

Launch and Commissioning

Construction progressed throughout the remainder of the 19th century and in the fall of 1900, Wyoming, Arkansas, and Nevada were launched, with Florida following a year later. All Arkansas-Class Monitors were commissioned by the summer of 1903. [29]

Ships of the Arkansas-Class

Ship NamesLaunchedFirst CommissionLast DecommissionFateNotes
Wyoming (Later Cheyenne)September 8, 1900 [29] December 8, 1902 [29] June 1, 1926 [30] Sold for scrap, April 30, 1939 [30] Underwent several Recommissioning and Decommissioning

Last Monitor Warship of the U.S. Navy [30]

Arkansas (Later Ozark)November 10, 1900 [29] October 28, 1902 [29] August 20, 1919 [31] Sold for scrap, January 26, 1922 [31]
Nevada (Later Tonopah)November 24, 1900 [29] March 5, 1903 [29] July 1, 1920 [32] Sold for scrap, January 26, 1922 [33]
Florida (Later Tallahassee)November 30, 1901 [29] June 18, 1903 [29] March 24, 1922 [34] Sold for scrap, July 25, 1922 [34]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 Friedman 1985, p. 452.
  2. Friedman 1985.
  3. DiGiulian & 12"/40 2015.
  4. DiGiulian & 4"/50 2015.
  5. "theNavyCWO.com - Naval Appropriations Act of 1898". www.thenavycwo.com. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  6. "TO HAVE THE GREATEST FIGHTING VESSELS IN THE WORLD". The Philadelphia Inquirer . 25 September 1898. p. 41.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 "BIDS FOR MONITORS". The Philadelphia Inquirer . 2 October 1898. p. 4.
  8. "NAMES FOR NEW MONITORS". The Kansas City Times . 6 October 1898. p. 4.
  9. "Names for the New Monitors". Norton Courier . 13 October 1898. p. 2.
  10. "TO IMPROVE MONITORS". The Baltimore Sun . 3 November 1898. p. 6.
  11. 1 2 "THE NEW MONITORS". The Fall River Daily Herald . 3 November 1898. p. 7.
  12. 1 2 Bureau, Eagie (18 November 1898). "FOUR NEW MONITORS WILL BE LARGER THAN FIRST EXPECTED". The Brooklyn Daily Eagle . p. 6.
  13. "PASSING OF THE MONITOR". The Evening Times (Washington D.C.) . 2 September 1898. p. 2.
  14. "Sampson's Opinion of Monitors". Public Press . 28 October 1898. p. 1.
  15. "The Inefficient Monitors". The Morganton Herald . 17 November 1898. p. 1.
  16. "New Monitors to Have Two Turrets". The Evening Journal . 3 November 1898. p. 2.
  17. "The New Monitors to Have Larger Guns". The Los Angeles Times . 3 November 1898. p. 2.
  18. 1 2 "NO TRUST AMONG SHIPBUILDERS". The San Francisco Call . 24 November 1898. p. 9.
  19. "THE NEW MONITORS". The Helena Independent . 1 December 1898. p. 11.
  20. Army, Navy Journal 1898-12-03: Vol 36 Iss 14. Internet Archive. Gannett Co., Inc. 3 December 1898.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  21. "THE NEW MONITORS, The First Vessels to Wear the Krupp Armor". Los Angeles Herald . 29 November 1898. p. 1.
  22. "Krupp Armor Costs Too Much". The Clay County Republican . 2 December 1898. p. 5.
  23. "ARMOUR PURCHASES FOR THE NEW MONITORS". Lincoln Journal Star . 9 June 1899. p. 1.
  24. "WILL FURNISH ARMOUR". Montpelier Evening Argus . 16 June 1899. p. 1.
  25. "ARMOUR PLATE FOR NEW VESSLES". The Butte Miner . 4 December 1899. p. 2.
  26. "CONNECTICUT WINS". Hartford Courant . 25 October 1898. p. 2.
  27. "A MONITOR OKLAHOMA". The Tahlequah Arrow . 1 September 1900. p. 4.
  28. "MONITOR "NEVADA"". Lyon County Monitor . 30 November 1900. p. 1.
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dept, United States Navy (1914). Ships' Data, U. S. Naval Vessels, 1911-. U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 53.
  30. 1 2 3 "USS Wyoming / Cheyenne (BM-10)". Military Equipment Guide With Photos. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  31. 1 2 "Encyclopedia of Arkansas". Encyclopedia of Arkansas. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  32. "Convention Center – Tonopah, Nevada" . Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  33. "Nevada I (Monitor No. 8)". public1.nhhcaws.local. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  34. 1 2 "World Battleships List: US "New Navy" Monitors". www.hazegray.org. Retrieved 9 August 2022.

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<i>Montana</i>-class battleship Proposed class of American super battleships

The Montana-class battleships were planned as successors of the Iowa class for the United States Navy, to be slower but larger, better armored, and with superior firepower. Five were approved for construction during World War II, but changes in wartime building priorities resulted in their cancellation in favor of continuing production of Essex-class aircraft carriers and Iowa-class battleships before any Montana-class keels were laid.

USS <i>Arizona</i> (BB-39) United States Navy battleship sunk during the attack on Pearl Harbor

USS Arizona was a battleship built for the United States Navy in the mid-1910s. Named in honor of the 48th state, she was the second and last ship in the Pennsylvania class. After being commissioned in 1916, Arizona remained stateside during World War I but escorted President Woodrow Wilson to the subsequent Paris Peace Conference. The ship was deployed abroad again in 1919 to represent American interests during the Greco-Turkish War. Two years later, she was transferred to the Pacific Fleet, under which the ship would remain for the rest of her career.

USS <i>New York</i> (ACR-2) Second United States Navy armored cruiser so designated

USS New York (ACR-2/CA-2) was the second United States Navy armored cruiser so designated; the first was the ill-fated Maine, which was soon redesignated a second-class battleship. Due to the unusually protracted construction of Maine, New York was actually the first armored cruiser to enter U.S. Navy service. The fourth Navy ship to be named in honor of the state of New York, she was later renamed Saratoga and then Rochester. With six 8-inch guns, she was the most heavily armed cruiser in the US Navy when commissioned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armored cruiser</span> Type of cruiser in the late 19th and early 20th centuries

The armored cruiser was a type of warship of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It was designed like other types of cruisers to operate as a long-range, independent warship, capable of defeating any ship apart from a battleship and fast enough to outrun any battleship it encountered.

<i>Indiana</i>-class battleship Pre-dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Indiana class was a class of three pre-dreadnought battleships launched in 1893. These were the first battleships built by the United States Navy comparable to contemporary European ships, such as the British HMS Hood. Authorized in 1890 and commissioned between November 1895 and April 1896, these were relatively small battleships with heavy armor and ordnance that pioneered the use of an intermediate battery. Specifically intended for coastal defense, their freeboard was insufficient to deal well with the waves of the open ocean. The turrets lacked counterweights, and the main belt armor was placed too low to be effective under most conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ironclad warship</span> Steam-propelled warship protected by iron or steel armor plates

An ironclad is a steam-propelled warship protected by iron or steel armor plates, constructed from 1859 to the early 1890s. The ironclad was developed as a result of the vulnerability of wooden warships to explosive or incendiary shells. The first ironclad battleship, Gloire, was launched by the French Navy in November 1859 - narrowly pre-empting the British Royal Navy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">16-inch/50-caliber Mark 7 gun</span> Naval gun

The 16"/50 caliber Mark 7 – United States Naval Gun is the main armament of the Iowa-class battleships and was the planned main armament of the cancelled Montana-class battleship.

<i>Nevada</i>-class battleship Dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Nevada class comprised two dreadnought battleships—Nevada and Oklahoma—built for the United States Navy in the 1910s. They were significant developments in battleship design, being the first in the world to adopt "all or nothing" armor, a major step forward in armor protection because it emphasized protection optimized for long-range engagements before the Battle of Jutland demonstrated the need for such a layout. They also introduced three-gun turrets and oil-fired water-tube boilers to the US fleet. The two Nevadas were the progenitors of the standard-type battleship, a group that included the next four classes of broadly similar battleships that were intended to be tactically homogeneous.

<i>Colorado</i>-class battleship Dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Colorado-class battleships were a group of four United States Navy super-dreadnoughts, the last of its pre-Treaty battleships. Designed during World War I, their construction overlapped the end of that conflict and continued in its immediate aftermath. Though all four keels were laid, only three ships entered service: Colorado, Maryland, and West Virginia. Washington was over 75% completed when she was canceled under the terms of the Washington Naval Treaty in 1922. As such, the 16" gun Colorado-class ships were the last and most powerful battleships built by the U.S. Navy until the North Carolina class entered service on the eve of World War II.

<i>Alaska</i>-class cruiser Class of battlecruiser ships

The Alaska class were six very large cruisers ordered before World War II for the United States Navy, of which only two were completed and saw service late in the war. The US Navy designation for the ships of this class was 'large cruiser' (CB) and the majority of leading reference works consider them as such. However, various other works have alternately described these ships as battlecruisers despite the US Navy having never classified them as such. The Alaskas were all named after territories or insular areas of the United States, signifying their intermediate status between larger battleships and smaller heavy and light cruisers.

<i>Mississippi</i>-class battleship Class of American pre-dreadnoughts

The Mississippi class of battleships comprised two ships which were authorized in the 1903 naval budget: Mississippi and Idaho; these were named for the 20th and 43rd states, respectively. These were the last pre-dreadnought battleships to be designed for the United States Navy, but not the last to be built, because one more ship of a prior design was completed later under the 1904 naval budget. While the quality and technology of the weaponry and armor were first-rate, these ships included a variety of main, intermediate, secondary, and tertiary gun sizes in a predreadnought configuration which became obsolete before the ships were completed.

<i>Florida</i>-class battleship Dreadnought battleship class of the United States Navy

The Florida-class battleships of the United States Navy comprised two ships: Florida and Utah. Launched in 1910 and 1909 respectively and commissioned in 1911, they were slightly larger than the preceding Delaware class design but were otherwise very similar. This was the first US battleship class in which all ships received steam turbine engines. In the previous Delaware-class, North Dakota received steam turbine propulsion as an experiment while Delaware retained triple-expansion engines.

USS <i>Florida</i> (BM-9)

USS Florida was an Arkansas-class monitor in the United States Navy.

<i>Pennsylvania</i>-class cruiser Class of American naval ships

The Pennsylvania class of six armored cruisers served in the United States Navy from 1905 to 1927. All six were renamed for cities 1912–1920, to make the state names available for the new battleships beginning with the Pennsylvania-class battleships. All of these served during World War I, with California being the only ship of the class to be lost. The remaining five armored cruisers were scrapped between 1930 and 1931 in accordance with the London Naval Treaty.

USS <i>Nevada</i> (BM-8)

The first USS Nevada, a monitor, was ordered on 4 May 1898. She was awarded to the Bath Iron Works, Bath, Maine on 19 October 1898 and laid down as Connecticut, 17 April 1899. Connecticut was launched 24 November 1900; sponsored by Miss Grace Boutelle; renamed Nevada, January 1901; and commissioned on 5 March 1903, Commander Thomas B. Howard in command. The total cost for the hull, machinery, armor and armament was $1,851,313.22.

USS <i>Arkansas</i> (BM-7) U.S. Navy ship built launched in 1900

The second USS Arkansas, was a single-turreted "New Navy" monitor and one of the last monitors built for the United States Navy. Arkansas was ordered on 4 May 1898 and awarded to Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Company on 11 October 1899. She was laid down just over a month later on 18 November 1899. Arkansas was launched almost a year later on 10 November 1900, sponsored by Bobbie N. Jones; but not commissioned for another two years, on 28 October 1902, with Commander Charles E. Vreeland in command.

The P class was a planned group of twelve heavy cruisers of Nazi Germany's Kriegsmarine; they were the successor to the Deutschland-class cruisers. Design work began in 1937 and continued until 1939; at least twenty designs were submitted with nine of them being considered. There were three designs that were selected as the final contenders. One design was armed with six 283mm main guns in one triple turret forward and one more turret aft. It had two 150mm double secondary gun turrets as secondary armament with one being positioned above and just fore of the aft of the main 283mm main turret, and the other being in front and lower of the front main gun turret. This design had more beam than the other 2 designs. It also mounted 2 seaplanes on its fantail instead of the mid ship area. The final design was armed with six 28 cm (11 in) quick-firing guns in two triple turrets, as in the preceding Deutschland class. The ships were designated as Panzerschiff, and given the preliminary names P1–P12. They were an improved design over the preceding planned D-class cruisers, which had been canceled in 1934. Although the ships were already assigned to shipyards, construction never began on the P-class ships after the O-class battlecruiser design superseded them.

<i>St. Louis</i>-class cruiser Class of American naval ships

The St. Louis-class cruisers were a class of three cruisers that served in the United States Navy at the beginning of the 20th century. Authorized in fiscal year 1901 by an Act of Congress of 7 June 1900 as part of the naval buildup touched off by the Spanish–American War, the St. Louis-class cruiser initially began as an improved Olympia. However, during the design phase, decisions were made that increased the size of the vessel from 6,000 long tons (6,100 t) to 9,700 long tons (9,900 t), including adding protection that resulted in the designation "semi-armored cruiser". This led to a larger power plant, and other decisions were made to try to increase speed and range, such as using smaller 6-inch (152 mm) guns instead of 8-inch (203 mm) guns, and adding coal capacity. The completed ship at 9,700 long tons was the same displacement as a full armored cruiser without the same armor. One reference describes the class as "among the earliest well-documented examples of creeping growth in warship design".

D-class cruiser (Germany) Pair of German cruisers, classified as Panzerschiffe

The D-class cruisers were a pair of German heavy cruisers, classified as panzerschiffe by the Reichsmarine. The ships were improved versions of the preceding Deutschland-class cruisers, authorized by Adolf Hitler in 1933. They were intended to counter a new French naval construction program. Displacement increased to 20,000 long tons (20,000 t), but Hitler allowed only increases to armor, prohibiting additions to the ships' main battery armament. Only one of the two ships was laid down, but work was canceled less than five months after the keel was laid. It was determined that the designs should be enlarged to counter the new French Dunkerque-class battleship. The construction contracts for both ships were superseded by the Scharnhorst-class battleships.