Battle of Mollwitz

Last updated
Battle of Mollwitz
Part of the First Silesian War (War of the Austrian Succession)
Prussian Army during battle of Mollwitz 1741.jpg
Prussian infantry during battle of Mollwitz 1741
Date10 April 1741
Location
Mollwitz, Silesia, now Małujowice, Poland
50°51′00″N17°24′36″E / 50.85000°N 17.41000°E / 50.85000; 17.41000
Result Prussian victory
Belligerents
Flag of the Kingdom of Prussia (1701-1750).svg  Prussia Banner of the Holy Roman Emperor without haloes (1400-1806).svg Austria
Commanders and leaders
Flag of the Kingdom of Prussia (1701-1750).svg Frederick II
Flag of the Kingdom of Prussia (1701-1750).svg Count Schwerin
Banner of the Holy Roman Emperor without haloes (1400-1806).svg Wilhelm Reinhard von Neipperg
Strength
21,600 [1]
58 guns [2]
15,800 [3] -19,000 [4]
19 guns [2]
Casualties and losses
4,850 dead, wounded or missing/prisoners [5] 4,550 dead, wounded or missing/prisoners [5]
The major battles of
Frederick the Great
Invisible Square.svg
Mapscaleline.svg
200km
125miles
20
Invisible Square.svg
19
Invisible Square.svg
18
Invisible Square.svg
17
Invisible Square.svg
Dresden
16
Invisible Square.svg
15
Invisible Square.svg
14
Invisible Square.svg
13
Invisible Square.svg
12
Invisible Square.svg
11
Invisible Square.svg
10
Invisible Square.svg
9
Invisible Square.svg
8
Invisible Square.svg
Prague
7
Invisible Square.svg
6
Invisible Square.svg
5
Invisible Square.svg
4
Invisible Square.svg
3
Invisible Square.svg
  current battle

The Battle of Mollwitz was fought by Prussia and Austria on 10 April 1741, during the First Silesian War (in the early stages of the War of the Austrian Succession). It was the first battle of the new Prussian King Frederick II, in which both sides made numerous military blunders and King Frederick II of Prussia fled the battlefield, but the Prussian Army still managed to attain victory. This battle cemented Frederick's authority over the newly conquered territory of Silesia and gave him valuable military experience.

Contents

Background

Empress Maria Theresa, ca 1762 Maria Theresia11.jpg
Empress Maria Theresa, ca 1762

The War of the Austrian Succession was sparked by the death of Charles VI in 1740 and the succession of his daughter Maria Theresa. [6] The Habsburg monarchy [lower-alpha 1] was originally subject to Salic law, which excluded women from inheriting it; the 1713 Pragmatic Sanction set this aside, allowing Maria Theresa to succeed her father. [7]

That became a European issue because the Habsburg monarchy was the most powerful element in the Holy Roman Empire, a loose federation of mostly-German states. Its position was threatened by the growing size and power of Bavaria, Prussia, and Saxony, as well as Habsburg expansion into lands held by the Ottoman Empire. The Holy Roman Empire was headed by the Holy Roman Emperor, which was, in theory, an elected post though it had been held by a Habsburg since 1437. France, Prussia and Saxony now challenged Austrian dominance by nominating Charles of Bavaria as Emperor. [8]

In December 1740, Frederick II seized the opportunity to invade Silesia and begin the First Silesian War. [9] With a population of over one million, the Silesian mining, weaving and dyeing industries produced 10% of total Imperial income. [10] Under Kurt Christoph Graf von Schwerin, the Prussians quickly over-ran most of the province and settled into winter quarters but failed to capture the southern fortresses of Glogau, Breslau, and Brieg. [11] Maria Theresa sent an army of about 20,000 men led by Wilhelm Reinhard von Neipperg to take back the province and assert herself as a strong monarch. [12]

The Austrian army's advance north

Neipperg's army caught Frederick II completely off guard as he lingered in the province, and surged northwards past Frederick and his army to relieve the city of Neisse, which was being besieged by a small Prussian force and had not yet fallen. [13] Both Neipperg and Frederick rushed northwards in parallel columns, in a race to reach the city first. In atrocious weather, Neipperg reached Neisse first and set up camp there. Frederick II and his entire army were now caught behind enemy lines with a large Austrian force lying between him and the rest of his kingdom and his supply and communication lines cut off. Both sides knew that battle was now inevitable. [14]

Prussian preparations

Captured Austrian soldiers told Frederick the exact position of Neipperg's forces at Mollwitz, and the morning fog and snow allowed Frederick's army to advance undetected to within 2000 paces of Neipperg's camp. [15] Most commanders would then have given the order to charge the camp and rout the Austrian army, but since Frederick had never fought a campaign or a battle before, he instead decided to deploy his army in a battle line. [16] There was very heavy snow on the ground which caused snow-blindness, and Frederick miscalculated the distance to the river on his right. He deployed several of his units behind a bend in the river where they could take no part in the battle, and several more units were deployed perpendicular to his two battle lines on the right flank. It is said that Schwerin commented early on that Frederick miscalculated the distance, but he was ignored. [17]

Austrian preparations

Neipperg was unprepared for battle when he discovered Frederick's entire army was approaching. [18] Not only were Austrian troops still in bivouac and cooking food, [19] but they were scattered across three villages [20] with their front facing away from the Prussian advance. [21] Had the Prussians attacked at this time, they would have encountered only disorganized resistance. [22] Because of the two hour delay caused by Frederick dressing his battle lines, [19] the Austrian army had the opportunity to concentrate its forces and form a battle line by the time the forces engaged one another just before 2 pm. [23]

Battle

Battle of Mollwitz, 10 April 1741. Battle of Mollwitz.png
Battle of Mollwitz, 10 April 1741.

At the beginning of the battle, the Prussians had the larger army. [24] They also had three times the field guns than the Austrians had; however, the Austrian cavalry outnumbered the Prussian cavalry two to one. [25] The Prussian forces advanced toward the Austrians in two lines while the Prussian artillery began bombarding the Austrian line. Six regiments of Austrian cavalry on the extreme left flank of the Austrian line, numbering 4,500 to 5,000 men and horses, [26] were goaded by the Prussian bombardment to charge the Prussian right flank without orders from Neipperg. [27] The charge shattered the Prussian cavalry, who received the attack while at a full halt. [28] Frederick was with the Prussian cavalry and was caught up in its rout. [29] This left the Prussian flank open to attack, and the Austrian cavalry then turned on the unprotected infantry. [30] Schwerin, the Prussian military commander under Frederick, now advised the king to leave the battlefield because it looked as though the Prussian army was about to be defeated; Frederick heeded this warning. [31] Abandoning the field, he was nearly caught and almost shot. [32] Frederick's absence allowed Schwerin, a veteran general, to take command of the troops himself. [33] [lower-alpha 2]

Prussian Grenadiers at Mollwitz by Adolph Menzel Menzel- Grenadiers at Mollwitz.jpg
Prussian Grenadiers at Mollwitz by Adolph Menzel

At this point of the battle, the scene was chaotic. [35] Having scattered the Prussian cavalry, the Austrian cavalry continued its attack on the Prussian infantry. [26] They charged the infantry repeatedly. [25] The firing of Prussian soldiers from the second line who were trying to stop the Austrians was also killing Prussian soldiers in the first line. [36] When asked whether the Prussians would retreat, Schwerin answered "Over enemy bodies". [37] In fact, the Prussian infantry, which had been rigorously drilled and trained under Frederick William I, [38] held firm and continued firing rapid volleys into the Austrian cavalry, causing it tremendous losses and killing its commander, General Römer. [39]

After the repulse of the Austrian cavalry, Schwerin reformed the infantry and ordered infantry units that were short on ammunition to strip the dead of theirs. [37] He then ordered the right flank of the Prussian infantry to advance toward the Austrian infantry line, [40] with the left flank receiving the order to advance a few minutes later. [41] This resulted in an oblique order attack on the Austrian infantry line with the right flank of the Prussians overlapping the left flank of the Austrians. [42] In addition, the Prussian infantry's use of the recently invented iron ramrod, [43] allowed them to fire 4–5 shots a minute with their flintlock muskets, which was three times more rapid than any other European army at the time. [44] This combination of discipline and firepower quickly overwhelmed the Austrian infantry, which consisted of a large number of raw recruits [45] lacking the training of the Prussian infantry. [46] Soon, the Austrian line collapsed from left to right, [42] and the Austrian army was routed from the field. [30]

Aftermath

Facsimile of Frederick II's drawing of the Battle of Mollwitz in a letter to Leopold I, Prince of Anhalt-Dessau. 20121216BetterFrederickMollwitzFac.png
Facsimile of Frederick II's drawing of the Battle of Mollwitz in a letter to Leopold I, Prince of Anhalt-Dessau.

In the end, the Prussians won a close victory [47] against a numerically inferior enemy [48] due to the leadership of Field Marshal Schwerin [49] and the superior training of the Prussian infantry. [50] After the battle, the Austrian army was not pursued and remained intact. [51] Neipperg retreated to Neisse, [52] remaining in Silesia to await reinforcements. [17] Frederick returned to his army the morning after the battle, [53] restored his lines of communication, and subsequently brought the siege of Brieg to a successful conclusion. [54]

After the battle Frederick censured himself for his mistakes [55] and learned from them, [56] writing later that Mollwitz educated him and his army. [17] The battle showed that Frederick could depend on the superior training of the Prussian infantry in a battle, [57] which had proven itself able to withstand the charge of Austrian cavalry. [58] Realizing that the cavalry would have to be reformed to be able to hold its own against the excellently-trained Austrian cavalry, [59] he soon instituted a training program to discipline the Prussian cavalry in coordinated action and precision that would increase its effectiveness in both reconnaissance and battle. [60] Mollwitz also illustrated the effectiveness of the oblique order, a tactic Frederick would use in most of his later major battles. [61]

In spite of the fact that the battle had been a near disaster for Frederick [62] and was not won through his direct command, [5] the victory raised his prestige in Europe [63] by demonstrating that Frederick was capable of challenging the Habsburgs and emerging victorious. [64] The Prussian victory also made it clear to Maria Theresa that she would not be able to reassert her control of Silesia easily and that Prussia was a military power that would have to be more carefully reckoned with. [65] The defeat of Maria Theresa's army at Mollwitz encouraged other rulers to deny the Pragmatic Sanction and to claim much of the Habsburg territories amongst themselves. [66] Within a few months, France, Spain, Bavaria, Saxony, Savoy and Prussia became allies in a loose coalition known as the League of Nymphenburg, widening the conflict into a larger European affair that would become known as the War of the Austrian Succession. [67]

Notes

  1. Often referred to as 'Austria', it included Austria, Hungary, Croatia, Bohemia, the Austrian Netherlands, and Parma
  2. Later, Schwerin wrote "Ich hatte den Entschluß gefaßt, die Bataille zu gewinnen, oder deren Verlust nicht zu überleben." ("I had made the decision to win the battle or not to survive the defeat") [34]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">War of the Austrian Succession</span> 1740–1748 war between European powers

The War of the Austrian Succession was a European conflict fought between 1740 and 1748, primarily in Central Europe, the Austrian Netherlands, Italy, the Atlantic Ocean and Mediterranean Sea. Related conflicts include King George's War in North America, the War of Jenkins' Ear, the First Carnatic War, and the First and Second Silesian Wars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frederick the Great</span> King of Prussia from 1740 to 1786

Frederick II was the monarch of Prussia from 1740 until 1786. He was the last Hohenzollern monarch titled King in Prussia, declaring himself King of Prussia after annexing Royal Prussia from the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1772. His most significant accomplishments include his military successes in the Silesian wars, his reorganisation of the Prussian Army, the First Partition of Poland, and his patronage of the arts and the Enlightenment. Prussia greatly increased its territories and became a major military power in Europe under his rule. He became known as Frederick the Great and was nicknamed "Old Fritz".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Silesian Wars</span> 18th-century wars between Prussia and Austria

The Silesian Wars were three wars fought in the mid-18th century between Prussia and Habsburg Austria for control of the Central European region of Silesia. The First (1740–1742) and Second (1744–1745) Silesian Wars formed parts of the wider War of the Austrian Succession, in which Prussia was a member of a coalition seeking territorial gain at Austria's expense. The Third Silesian War (1756–1763) was a theatre of the global Seven Years' War, in which Austria in turn led a coalition of powers aiming to seize Prussian territory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Lobositz</span>

The Battle of Lobositz or Lovosice also Lowositz on 1 October 1756 was the opening land battle of the Third Silesian War and the wider Seven Years' War. Frederick the Great's 28,000 Prussians were prevented by 33,000 Austrians under Maximilian Ulysses Count von Browne from continuing their invasion into the rich Bohemian plain, forcing Frederick to ultimately fall back north into Saxony for the winter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Prague (1757)</span> Part of the Third Silesian War

In the Battle of Prague or Battle of Štěrboholy, fought on 6 May 1757 during the Third Silesian War, Frederick the Great's 64,000 Prussians forced 60,000 Austrians to retreat, but having lost 14,300 men, decided he was not strong enough to attack Prague. The battle is mentioned in the famous German ballad Lenore written in 1773 by Gottfried August Bürger.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Kolín</span> 1757 battle of the Seven Years War

The Battle of Kolín (Kolin) on 18 June 1757 saw 54,000 Austrians under Count von Daun defeat 34,000 Prussians under Frederick the Great during the Third Silesian War. Prussian attempts to turn the Austrian right flank turned into piecemeal frontal attacks and were defeated in five and a half hours of combat. The Prussians lost 13,733 men, the Austrians 8,100. Frederick gave up the siege of Prague as well as his planned march on Vienna and retreated to Saxony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Leuthen</span> 1757 battle of the Seven Years War

The Battle of Leuthen was fought on 5 December 1757 between Frederick the Great's Prussian Army and an Austrian army commanded by Prince Charles of Lorraine and Count Leopold Joseph von Daun. Frederick used maneuver warfare and knowledge of the terrain to rout the larger Austrian force completely. The victory ensured Prussian control of Silesia during the Third Silesian War, which was part of the Seven Years' War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Zorndorf</span> Battle during the Seven Years War

The Battle of Zorndorf, during the Seven Years' War, was fought on 25 August 1758 between Russian troops commanded by Count William Fermor and a Prussian army commanded by King Frederick the Great. The battle was tactically inconclusive, with both armies holding their ground and claiming victory. The site of the battle was the Prussian village of Zorndorf. During the battle, Frederick famously took a regimental standard and led an attack himself, rallying his troops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Kunersdorf</span> 1759 battle of the Seven Years War

The Battle of Kunersdorf occurred on 12 August 1759 near Kunersdorf immediately east of Frankfurt an der Oder. Part of the Third Silesian War and the wider Seven Years' War, the battle involved over 100,000 men. An Allied army commanded by Pyotr Saltykov and Ernst Gideon von Laudon that included 41,000 Russians and 18,500 Austrians defeated Frederick the Great's army of 50,900 Prussians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Torgau</span> Battle of the Seven Years War

In the Battle of Torgau on 3 November 1760, King Frederick the Great's Prussian army fought an Austrian army under the command of Field Marshal Leopold Josef Graf Daun. The Prussians won a costly victory in one of the bloodiest battles of the Third Silesian War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Chotusitz</span> Battle during the War of the Austrian Succession

The Battle of Chotusitz, or Chotusice, sometimes called the Battle of Čáslav, took place on 17 May 1742, in Bohemia, now the Czech Republic; it was part of the 1740 to 1742 First Silesian War, itself a subsidiary of the wider War of the Austrian Succession.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Hohenfriedberg</span> Prussia v. Austria, 1745, Second Silesian War

The Battle of Hohenfriedberg or Hohenfriedeberg, now Dobromierz, also known as the Battle of Striegau, now Strzegom, was one of Frederick the Great's most admired victories. Frederick's Prussian army decisively defeated an Austrian army under Prince Charles Alexander of Lorraine on 4 June 1745 during the Second Silesian War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kurt Christoph Graf von Schwerin</span> German general (1684–1757)

Kurt Christoph, Graf von Schwerin was a Prussian Generalfeldmarschall, one of the leading commanders under Frederick the Great.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Silesian War</span> 1744–45 war between Prussia and Austria

The Second Silesian War was a war between Prussia and Austria that lasted from 1744 to 1745 and confirmed Prussia's control of the region of Silesia. The war was fought mainly in Silesia, Bohemia, and Upper Saxony and formed one theatre of the wider War of the Austrian Succession. It was the second of three Silesian Wars fought between Frederick the Great's Prussia and Maria Theresa's Austria in the mid-18th century, all three of which ended in Prussian control of Silesia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Liegnitz (1760)</span> Part of the Third Silesian War

The Battle of Liegnitz on 15 August 1760 saw Frederick the Great's Prussian Army defeat the Austrian army under Ernst von Laudon during the Third Silesian War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Silesian War</span> 18th-century war between Prussia and Austria

The First Silesian War was a war between Prussia and Austria that lasted from 1740 to 1742 and resulted in Prussia's seizing most of the region of Silesia from Austria. The war was fought mainly in Silesia, Moravia and Bohemia and formed one theatre of the wider War of the Austrian Succession. It was the first of three Silesian Wars fought between Frederick the Great's Prussia and Maria Theresa's Austria in the mid-18th century, all three of which ended in Prussian control of Silesia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Third Silesian War</span> 1756–63 conflict between Prussia and Austria; theatre of the Seven Years War

The Third Silesian War was a war between Prussia and Austria that lasted from 1756 to 1763 and confirmed Prussia's control of the region of Silesia. The war was fought mainly in Silesia, Bohemia and Upper Saxony and formed one theatre of the Seven Years' War. It was the last of three Silesian Wars fought between Frederick the Great's Prussia and Maria Theresa's Austria in the mid-18th century, all three of which ended in Prussian control of Silesia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul von Werner</span> Austrian soldier who later fought for Prussia

Johann Paul von Werner was chief of the Prussian Hussar Regiment No. 6 ; he also received the Prussian Order Pour le Mérite. Initially in Austrian service, he fought against Spain, France, the Ottoman Empire and against Prussia. One of Frederick the Great's trusted diplomats, Hans Karl von Winterfeldt, recruited him into Prussian service in 1750; subsequently, he fought for Prussia against the Austrians in the Seven Years' War and the War of Bavarian Succession. He was wounded once, and taken prisoner several times. The Prussian playwright Gotthold Lessing modeled the character of the sergeant in his Minna von Barnhelm on Werner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Nymphenburg</span> Treaty enlarging War of Austrian Succession

The Treaty of Nymphenburg was a treaty between Bavaria and Spain that was concluded on May 28, 1741 at the Nymphenburg Palace in Munich. It was the first formal pact of a series of French-sponsored alliances against the Habsburg Monarch, Maria Theresa. Through the agreement, the Bavarian Elector Charles Albert gained the support of King Philip V of Spain to become the next Holy Roman Emperor against the claims of the Habsburgs. The treaty was brokered by Marshal Belleisle under the authority of Louis XV of France. As part of the negotiations, the French agreed to materially support Charles Albert's claims. The treaty signaled the expansion of the First Silesian War, which started as a local war between Prussia and the Habsburg Monarchy, into the War of the Austrian Succession, a pan-European conflict.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of St. Pölten</span> Battle in the Austrian War of Succession

The Battle of St. Pölten was an engagement between Austrian and Franco-Bavarian forces. It impacted the procession of the 1741 Austrian campaign.

References

Citations

  1. Bodart 1908, p. 189; Duffy 2015, p. 30; Showalter 1996, p. 45.
  2. 1 2 Bodart 1908, p. 189.
  3. Bodart 1908, p. 189; Showalter 1996, p. 43.
  4. Duffy 2015, p. 30.
  5. 1 2 3 Duffy 2015, p. 33.
  6. Kugler 1845, pp. 159–160.
  7. Anderson 1995, p. 3.
  8. Winder 2014, pp. 250–251.
  9. Kugler 1845, pp. 161–164.
  10. Armour 2012, pp. 99–101.
  11. Anderson 1995, pp. 68–72.
  12. Bassett 2015, pp. 88–91.
  13. Storring 2017, p. 233.
  14. Kugler 1845, pp. 175–176.
  15. Reddaway 1904, pp. 112–113.
  16. Carlyle 1892, pp. 17–18.
  17. 1 2 3 Blanning 2016, p. 104.
  18. Longman 1895, p. 48.
  19. 1 2 Reiners 1960, p. 98.
  20. Duffy 2015, p. 30; Reddaway 1904, p. 113.
  21. Asprey 1986, p. 198.
  22. Duffy 2015, pp. 30–31; Reddaway 1904, p. 113; Reiners 1960, p. 98.
  23. Carlyle 1892, pp. 15–18; Duffy 2015, p. 31.
  24. Bodart 1908, p. 198; Duffy 2015, p. 30; Hochedlinger 2015, p. 243.
  25. 1 2 Pratt 1956, p. 208.
  26. 1 2 Duffy 2015, p. 31.
  27. Asprey 1986, p. 200; Kugler 1845, pp. 176–177; Pratt 1956, p. 208; Reddaway 1904, pp. 113–114.
  28. Duffy 2015, pp. 31–32.
  29. Carlyle 1892, pp. 19–20; Kugler 1845, p. 117.
  30. 1 2 Longman 1895, pp. 48–49.
  31. Kugler 1845, pp. 177–178.
  32. Kugler 1845, p. 178.
  33. Asprey 1986, p. 202; Blanning 2016, p. 102; Storring 2017, p. 100.
  34. Droysen 1868, p. 240.
  35. Asprey 1986, p. 201.
  36. Carlyle 1892, p. 19; Duffy 2015, p. 32; Reddaway 1904, p. 115.
  37. 1 2 Asprey 1986, p. 202.
  38. Easum 2018, p. 24.
  39. Carlyle 1892, p. 19.
  40. Reddaway 1904, pp. 114–115.
  41. Asprey 1986, pp. 202–203.
  42. 1 2 Pratt 1956, p. 209.
  43. Shaw 1951, p. 49.
  44. Reiners 1960, p. 17.
  45. Reddaway 1904, p. 115; Showalter 1996, p. 45.
  46. Asprey 1986, pp. 202–203; Easum 2018, p. 24.
  47. Wilson 2008, p. 344.
  48. Hochedlinger 2015, p. 248.
  49. Duffy 2015, p. 33; Holborn 1982, p. 210; Reddaway 1904, pp. 115–116.
  50. Anderson 1995, p. 76; Colby 1933, p. 329; Kugler 1845, p. 178.
  51. Anderson 1995, p. 76; Blanning 2016, p. 104; Duffy 2015, p. 33.
  52. Reddaway 1904, p. 116.
  53. Carlyle 1892, p. 20; Duffy 2015, p. 33; Kugler 1845, p. 178.
  54. Duffy 2015, p. 33; Reddaway 1904, pp. 116–117.
  55. Duffy 2015, p. 33; Kugler 1845, pp. 178–179.
  56. Browning 2005, p. 533.
  57. von Clausewitz 1873.
  58. Pratt 1956, p. 210.
  59. Holborn 1982, pp. 210–211; Showalter 1996, p. 51.
  60. Pratt 1956, p. 211.
  61. Pratt 1956, p. 212.
  62. Mooney 2013, p. 32.
  63. Reddaway 1904, p. 117.
  64. Longman 1895, p. 117; Pratt 1956, p. 209.
  65. Storring 2017, pp. 266–267.
  66. Bassett 2015, p. 91.
  67. Clark 2006, pp. 193–194.

Works cited