Child pornography laws in Australia

Last updated

The Australian law prohibits all sexual depictions of children under an age set by state and territory legislation. The relevant ages are under 16 in the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, Queensland and Western Australia, under 17 in South Australia, and under 18 in the other jurisdictions and under federal law. [1] The laws covering child pornography are differently defined in the various Australian jurisdictions, as are the penalties. The laws also cover depictions of sexual acts involving people over the threshold age who are simulating or otherwise alluding to being underage, even if all those involved are of a legal age. [2] People have been successfully prosecuted after describing acts of abuse via MMS. [3]

Contents

The maximum penalty for the possession, production, distribution, import, export, sale, or access over the internet of child pornography in Australia is 15 years, This was increased from 10 years in March 2010. [4] A fine of up to A$275,000 may also come in place of, or in addition to, the prison sentence as well as sex offender register requirements. Furthermore, most convictions in this respect are for possession of child pornography, which is typically dealt with under state legislation, and there have been only a few convictions for production and/or distribution of such material (under commonwealth legislation). [5] Furthermore, there is a zero-tolerance policy in place, which covers real children as well as purely fictional children. [6] Operation Auxin in September 2004 led to the arrest of almost 200 people on charges of child pornography, and "sting" operations are common.

Anime and hentai

In August 2007, an Australian was sentenced to pay an A$9,000 fine for attempting to import eight DVDs of Japanese anime and hentai found to contain pornographic depictions of children and 14 found to contain depictions of sexual violence. No images of real children were involved. "Customs National Manager Investigations, Richard Janeczko, said that it was important to understand that even cartoons or drawings such as those depicted in anime were prohibited if they contained offensive sexual content." [7]

In October 2020, Japanese goods importer J-List reported that it had cancelled all sales of adult goods to Australia following the rejection of packages by the Australian Border Force, and a recommendation from DHL. [8] While J-List refer to this as the content being banned, another adult goods supplier, otonaJP, confirmed that they will continue shipping to Australia, including with DHL, and their situation has not changed. [9]

Other cartoon depictions

Also, in December 2008, a New South Wales Supreme Court judge, Justice Michael Adams, ruled to uphold a magistrate's decision that a pornographic cartoon parodying characters on The Simpsons (Bart and Lisa) was child pornography, because "[i]t follows that a fictional cartoon character, even one which departs from recognisable human forms in some significant respects, may nevertheless be the depiction of a person within the meaning of the Act." [10] [11]

The appellant, Alan John McEwan, was fined $3000 Aus ($3,170 US). Judge Adams explained the law was appropriate because cartoons could "fuel demand for material that does involve the abuse of children", also adding "A cartoon character might well constitute the depiction of such a person". [12] A BBC reporter summarized the judge's decision: "he decided that the mere fact that they were not realistic representations of human beings did not mean that they could not be considered people". [13]

This case has attracted international attention, alongside attention to more local cases,[ citation needed ] with author Neil Gaiman commenting on it: "I suspect the Judge might have just inadvertently granted human rights to cartoon characters. I think it's nonsensical in every way that it could possibly be nonsensical." [14]

Case concerning a written work

In March 2011, a Tasmanian man was convicted of possessing child pornography after police investigators discovered an electronic copy of a nineteenth-century written work, The Pearl by Anonymous on his computer. HarperCollins is the most recent publisher of The Pearl, which is available for purchase within Australia. [15] However the conviction was overturned on appeal. [16]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hentai</span> Anime and manga pornography

Hentai is a style of Japanese pornographic anime and manga. In addition to anime and manga, hentai works exist in a variety of media, including artwork and video games.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pornography in Japan</span>

In Japan, pornography has unique characteristics that readily distinguish it from western pornography. Pornographic films are known as "adult videos" (AV) in Japan, so Japanese adult videos (JAV) refers to the Japanese Adult Video industry. Animated films are referred to as hentai in English, but in Japan the terms "adult anime" and "erotic animation" are used. In addition to pornographic videos and magazines featuring live actors, there are now categories of pornographic manga and anime, and pornographic computer games.

<i>Lolicon</i> Genre of sexualized young girl characters

In Japanese popular culture, lolicon is a genre of fictional media which focuses on young girl characters, particularly in a sexually suggestive or erotic manner. The term, a portmanteau of the English-language phrase "Lolita complex", also refers to desire and affection for such characters, and their fans. Associated mainly with stylized imagery in manga, anime, and video games, lolicon in otaku culture is generally understood as distinct from desires for realistic depictions of young girls, or real young girls as such, and is associated with moe, or affection for fictional characters, often bishōjo characters in manga or anime.

Definitions and restrictions on pornography vary across jurisdictions. The production, distribution, and possession of pornographic films, photographs, and similar material are activities that are legal in many but not all countries, providing that any specific people featured in the material have consented to being included and are above a certain age. Various other restrictions often apply as well. The minimum age requirement for performers is most typically 18 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PROTECT Act of 2003</span> United States law regarding child abuse and violent crimes against children

The PROTECT Act of 2003 is a United States law with the stated intent of preventing child abuse as well as investigating and prosecuting violent crimes against children. "PROTECT" is a backronym which stands for "Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to End the Exploitation of Children Today".

Pornography has been dominated by a few pan-European producers and distributors, the most notable of which is the Private Media Group that successfully claimed the position previously held by Color Climax Corporation in the early 1990s. Most European countries also have local pornography producers, from Portugal to Serbia, who face varying levels of competition with international producers. The legal status of pornography varies widely in Europe; its production and distribution are illegal in countries such as Ukraine, Belarus and Bulgaria, while Hungary has liberal pornography laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cartoon pornography</span> Cartoon characters in sexual situations

Cartoon pornography is the portrayal of illustrated or animated fictional cartoon characters in erotic or sexual situations. Animated cartoon pornography, or erotic animation, is a subset of the larger field of adult animation, not all of which is sexually explicit.

New York v. Ferber, 458 U.S. 747 (1982), was a landmark decision of the U.S Supreme Court, unanimously ruling that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution did not protect the sale or manufacture of child sexual abuse material and that states could outlaw it.

Child erotica is non-pornographic material relating to children that is used by any individuals for sexual purposes. It is a broader term than child pornography, incorporating material that may cause sexual arousal such as nonsexual images, books or magazines on children or pedophilia, toys, diaries, or clothes. Law enforcement investigators have found that child erotica is often collected by pedophiles and child sexual abuse offenders. It may be collected as a form of compulsive behavior and as a substitute for illegal underage pornography and is often a form of evidence for criminal behavior.

Section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 is a law in the United Kingdom criminalising possession of what it refers to as "extreme pornographic images". The law came into force on 26 January 2009. The legislation was brought in following the murder of Jane Longhurst by a man who was said at the time of his trial to have had "extreme pornography" in his possession at the time of the death. The law has been more widely used than originally predicted, raising concerns as to whether the legislation is being used for prosecutions beyond the scope originally envisaged by parliament.

Legal frameworks around fictional pornography depicting minors vary depending on country and nature of the material involved. Laws against production, distribution, and consumption of child pornography generally separate images into three categories: real, pseudo, and virtual. Pseudo-photographic child pornography is produced by digitally manipulating non-sexual images of real minors to make pornographic material. Virtual child pornography depicts purely fictional characters. "Fictional pornography depicting minors," as covered in this article, includes these latter two categories, whose legalities vary by jurisdiction, and often differ with each other and with the legality of real child pornography.

An obscenity is any utterance or act that strongly offends the prevalent morality of the time. It is derived from the Latin obscēnus, obscaenus, "boding ill; disgusting; indecent", of uncertain etymology. Generally, the term can be used to indicate strong moral repugnance and outrage in expressions such as "obscene profits" and "the obscenity of war". As a legal term, it usually refers to descriptions and depictions of people engaged in sexual and excretory activity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pornography in Australia</span>

While pornography is legal in Australia, compared to other Western countries, Australia has historically had restrictive laws. Prior to the invention of internet pornography, pornographic films were de facto illegal in all six states, with pornography only being legal in the territories. Some extreme forms of pornography, such as pornography depicting children or animals, are illegal in Australia. Some other forms of pornography, such as BDSM pornography, are also technically illegal in Australia, but are widely available online.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child pornography laws in the United States</span>

In the United States, child pornography is illegal under federal law and in all states and is punishable by up to life imprisonment and fines of up to $250,000. U.S. laws regarding child pornography are virtually always enforced and amongst the sternest in the world. The Supreme Court of the United States has found child pornography to be outside the protections of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Federal sentencing guidelines on child pornography differentiate between production, distribution, and purchasing/receiving, and also include variations in severity based on the age of the child involved in the materials, with significant increases in penalties when the offense involves a prepubescent child or a child under the age of 18. U.S. law distinguishes between pornographic images of an actual minor, realistic images that are not of an actual minor, and non-realistic images such as drawings. The latter two categories are legally protected unless found to be obscene, whereas the first does not require a finding of obscenity.

Simulated child pornography is child pornography depicting what appear to be minors but which is produced without their direct involvement.

Section 163.1 of the Criminal Code of Canada forbids the production, distribution, and possession of child pornography, which are punishable by a maximum of ten or fourteen years of imprisonment depending on the offense. Portions of the law concerning one-year mandatory minimums for possession and making of child pornography have since been struck down as unconstitutional.

The production, sale, distribution, and commercialization of child pornography in Japan is illegal under the Act on Punishment of Activities Relating to Child Prostitution and Child Pornography, and the Protection of Children (1999), and is punishable by a maximum penalty of five years in prison and/or a fine of ¥5,000,000. Simple possession of child pornography was made illegal by an amendment to the act in 2014. Virtual child pornography, which depicts wholly-fictional characters, is legal to produce and possess.

Child pornography is illegal in most countries, but there is substantial variation in definitions, categories, penalties, and interpretations of laws. Differences include the definition of "child" under the laws, which can vary with the age of sexual consent; the definition of "child pornography" itself, for example on the basis of medium or degree of reality; and which actions are criminal. Laws surrounding fictional child pornography are a major source of variation between jurisdictions; some maintain distinctions in legality between real and fictive pornography depicting minors, while others regulate fictive material under general laws against child pornography.

Child pornography is erotic material that depicts persons under the designated age of majority. The precise characteristics of what constitutes child pornography varies by criminal jurisdiction.

Rule 34 is an Internet meme which claims that Internet pornography exists concerning every possible topic. The concept is commonly depicted as fan art of normally non-erotic subjects engaging in sexual activity. It can also include writings, animations, images, GIFs and any other form of media to which the internet provides opportunities for proliferation and redistribution.

References

  1. ↑ Boxall, Hayley; Fuller, Georgina (29 March 2016). Brief review of contemporary sexual offence and child sexual abuse legislation in Australia: 2015 update (Report). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. doi:10.52922/sp09951. ISBN   9781922009951 . Retrieved 15 November 2024.
  2. ↑ "Ln: Child Exploitation Material Laws (Australia)". Archived from the original on 8 November 2015. Retrieved 20 February 2015.
  3. ↑ "Queensland man charged over SMS child pornography". Agence France-Presse. 17 July 2007. Archived from the original on 29 July 2008. Retrieved 22 November 2009.
  4. ↑ "CHAPTER 2". Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  5. ↑ Cameron, Trudie (27 May 2020). "Access or Possess Child Abuse Material". Armstrong Legal. Retrieved 12 September 2022.
  6. ↑ McLelland, Mark (December 2005). "The World of Yaoi: The Internet, Censorship and the Global 'Boys' Love' Fandom". Australian Feminist Law Journal. 23 (1): 61–77. doi:10.1080/13200968.2005.10854344. ISSN   1320-0968.
  7. ↑ "$9000 fine for importing child pornography". Australian Customs and Border Protection Service. 14 August 2007. Archived from the original on 23 October 2009. Retrieved 14 November 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  8. ↑ "Australia Bans Waifus, Onaholes, and Fun". J-List Blog. 15 October 2020. Retrieved 15 November 2024.
  9. ↑ "Adult Toys and Hentai Shipping to Australia - our Statement". otonaJP. 3 November 2020. Archived from the original on 3 November 2020. Retrieved 5 November 2020. otonaJP still ships to Australia, with Japan Post as well as DHL. Australia has already been one of the countries that has more strict rules in place than others when it comes to Hentai content for quite some time. The truth however also is that many countries in the world have similar laws and if worst comes to worst, customs officers in pretty much any country in the world can stop your package, based on their laws if they consider the shown characters too young. So beside being stricter than others, the situation in Australia is not much different from the US or even Europe.
  10. ↑ McEwen v Simmons and Another (Report). 2008. Retrieved 14 November 2024.
  11. ↑ "Simpsons cartoon rip-off is child porn: judge". The Age. 8 December 2008. Retrieved 18 November 2009. A NSW Supreme Court judge has ruled an internet cartoon in which lookalike child characters from The Simpsons engage in sexual acts is child pornography.
  12. ↑ Oates, John (8 December 2008). "Aussie convicted over Simpsons sex pics". The Register . Retrieved 14 November 2024.
  13. ↑ Bryant, Nick (8 December 2008). "Fake Simpsons cartoon 'is porn'". BBC News . Retrieved 14 November 2024.
  14. ↑ Gaiman, Neil (8 December 2008). "the word 'person' included fictional or imaginary characters ..." Retrieved 14 November 2024.
  15. ↑ "Tasmanian alderman David Traynor gets child porn conviction for book still sold in Australia". The Australian . 3 March 2011. Retrieved 7 April 2011.[ permanent dead link ]
  16. ↑ Smith, Matt (11 August 2011). "Child porn finding revoked". The Mercury . Archived from the original on 8 October 2012. Retrieved 14 November 2024.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.