Code of Justinian

Last updated
Code of Justinian
Codex Justinianeus
Archive-ugent-be-B96419FA-8AA4-11E3-9E68-C04DD43445F2 DS-441 (cropped).jpg
Excerpt from the manuscript "Codex Justiniani I-IX". Medieval copy of the famous Code of Justinian. Copied by Franciscus Accursius in the 13th century. Preserved in the Ghent University Library. [1]
Petrvs Sabbativs Ivstinianvs Avgvstvs, Roman emperor
Territorial extent Eastern Roman Empire
Enacted byPetrvs Sabbativs Ivstinianvs Avgvstvs, Roman emperor
Effective 7 April 529 (529-04-07)
Introduced by John of Cappadocia, Tribonian
Related legislation

The Code of Justinian (Latin : Codex Justinianus, Justinianeus [2] or Justiniani) is one part of the Corpus Juris Civilis , the codification of Roman law ordered early in the 6th century AD by Justinian I, who was Eastern Roman emperor in Constantinople. Two other units, the Digest and the Institutes, were created during his reign. The fourth part, the Novellae Constitutiones (New Constitutions, or Novels), was compiled unofficially after his death but is now also thought of as part of the Corpus Juris Civilis. [3]

Contents

Creation

Justinian I depicted on a mosaic in the church of San Vitale, Ravenna, Italy Meister von San Vitale in Ravenna 004.jpg
Justinian I depicted on a mosaic in the church of San Vitale, Ravenna, Italy

Shortly after Justinian became emperor in 527, he decided the empire's legal system needed repair. There existed three codices of imperial laws and other individual laws, many of which conflicted or were out of date. The Codex Gregorianus and the Codex Hermogenianus were unofficial compilations. (The term "Codex" refers to the physical aspect of the works, being in book form, rather than on papyrus rolls. The transition to the codex occurred around AD 300.) [4] The Codex Theodosianus was an official compilation ordered by Theodosius II. [4] In February 528, Justinian promulgated the constitution Hac quae necessario, by which was created a ten-man commission to review these earlier compilations as well as individual laws, eliminate everything unnecessary or obsolete, make changes as it saw fit, and create a single compilation of imperial laws in force. [5] The commission was headed by the praetorian prefect John the Cappadocian [6] and also included Tribonian, who was later to head the other Corpus Juris Civilis projects. [7]

The commission finished its work in 14 months, and the compilation was promulgated in April 529 by the Constitutio Summa. [8] However, this compilation did not eliminate all the conflicts that had arisen over the years in Roman jurisprudence, and the constitutions in the Code were to be used alongside the conflicting opinions of ancient jurists. "The citation of the said constitutions of Our Code, with the opinions of the ancient interpreters of the law, will suffice for the disposal of all cases." [9] Justinian attempted to harmonize these conflicting opinions by issuing his "Fifty Decisions" and by passing additional new laws. This meant that his Code no longer reflected the latest imperial law. Thus, Justinian ordered a new compilation to supersede the first, and this Codex was published in 534. [10] No copies of the first edition of the Code have survived; only a fragment of an index of contents on an Egyptian papyrus remains. [11] Known as the Codex Repetitae Praelectionis, this second edition of the Code was published on November 16, 534, and took effect on December 30. [12] The Codex consists of twelve books: book 1 concerns ecclesiastical law, sources of law, and the duties of higher offices; books 2–8 cover private law; book 9 deals with crimes; and books 10–12 contain administrative law. The Code's structure is based on ancient classifications set out in the edictum perpetuum (perpetual edict), as is that of the Digest.

Rediscovery

In the West, Justinian's Codex was largely lost, or in many places never present, due to the limited western extent of the Roman territories. The Latin version known today was painstakingly restored over many centuries. The only known manuscript that once contained the entire Latin Codex is a Veronese palimpsest of the 6th or 7th century; it is now only fragments. [13] [14] Within its home in the Roman Empire, the code was translated into Greek, which had become the governing language, and adapted, in the 9th century as the Basilika . It appears as if the Latin Code was shortened in the Middle Ages into an "Epitome Codex", with inscriptions being dropped and numerous other changes made. [15] Some time in the 8th or 9th century, the last three books of the Code were separated from the others, and many other laws in the first nine books, including all of those written in Greek, were dropped. [16] Substantially complete versions of Justinian's Codex were restored around the end of the 12th century, and the humanists of the 16th century added the laws originally promulgated in Greek. [17] Paul Krüger created the modern, standard version of the Codex in 1877. [18]

English translations

No English translations were made of the Codex until the 20th century. In 1932, the English translation of the entire Corpus Juris Civilis (CJC) by Samuel Parsons Scott was published posthumously. [19] Unfortunately, Scott used the Kriegel brothers' edition of the CJC rather than that of Theodor Mommsen, Paul Krüger, Rudolf Schöll and Wilhelm Kroll, which is accepted as the most reliable, and his translation was severely criticized. [20] [21] [22] Reviewing Scott's work, the Roman law scholar W. W. Buckland wrote that Scott "...had at his disposal an adequate latinity and has produced a version written in an English which can be read with pleasure. But much more than that was needed, and the work cannot be said to satisfy these further requirements." [23] Around the same time that Scott was active, Wyoming Supreme Court Justice Fred H. Blume was translating the Code and Novels, using the standard Mommsen, Krüger, Schöll, and Kroll version. [24] While this was not printed in his lifetime, in 2005 his translation of both the Code and the Novels was published on the Annotated Justinian Code website. [25] A new English translation of the Codex, based on Blume's, was published in October 2016. [26]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman law</span> Legal system of Ancient Rome (c. 449 BC – AD 529)

Roman law is the legal system of ancient Rome, including the legal developments spanning over a thousand years of jurisprudence, from the Twelve Tables, to the Corpus Juris Civilis ordered by Eastern Roman emperor Justinian I. Roman law forms the basic framework for civil law, the most widely used legal system today, and the terms are sometimes used synonymously. The historical importance of Roman law is reflected by the continued use of Latin legal terminology in many legal systems influenced by it, including common law.

<i>Corpus Juris Civilis</i> Collection of legal works codified by Justinian I of Byzantium

The Corpus JurisCivilis is the modern name for a collection of fundamental works in jurisprudence, issued from 529 to 534 by order of Byzantine Emperor Justinian I. It is also sometimes referred to metonymically after one of its parts, the Code of Justinian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribonian</span> Byzantine jurist (c. 485–542)

Tribonian was a notable Byzantine jurist and advisor, who during the reign of the Emperor Justinian I, supervised the revision of the legal code of the Byzantine Empire. He has been described as one of the wisest collaborators of Emperor Justinian.

<i>Digest</i> (Roman law) Roman law digest

The Digest, also known as the Pandects, was a compendium or digest of juristic writings on Roman law compiled by order of the Byzantine emperor Justinian I in 530–533 AD. It is divided into 50 books.

<i>Codex Theodosianus</i> Compilation of laws of Roman Empire (438)

The Codex Theodosianus was a compilation of the laws of the Roman Empire under the Christian emperors since 312. A commission was established by Emperor Theodosius II and his co-emperor Valentinian III on 26 March 429 and the compilation was published by a constitution of 15 February 438. It went into force in the eastern and western parts of the empire on 1 January 439. The original text of the codex is also found in the Breviary of Alaric, promulgated on 2 February 506.

<i>Littera Florentina</i> Codex

The parchment codex called Littera Florentina is the closest surviving version of the official Digest of Roman law promulgated by Justinian I in 530–533.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Byzantine law</span>

Byzantine law was essentially a continuation of Roman law with increased Orthodox Christian and Hellenistic influence. Most sources define Byzantine law as the Roman legal traditions starting after the reign of Justinian I in the 6th century and ending with the Fall of Constantinople in the 15th century. Although future Byzantine codes and constitutions derived largely from Justinian's Corpus Juris Civilis, their main objectives were idealistic and ceremonial rather than practical. Following Hellenistic and Near-Eastern political systems, legislations were tools to idealize and display the sacred role and responsibility of the emperor as the holy monarch chosen by God and the incarnation of law "nómos émpsychos", thus having philosophical and religious purposes that idealized perfect Byzantine kingship.

CJC may refer to:

<i>Basilika</i> Collection of laws completed c. 892 CE in Byzantine Constantinople

The Basilika was a collection of laws completed c. 892 AD in Constantinople by order of the Eastern Roman emperor Leo VI the Wise during the Macedonian dynasty. This was a continuation of the efforts of his father, Basil I, to simplify and adapt the Emperor Justinian I's Corpus Juris Civilis code of law issued between 529 and 534 which had become outdated. The term "Basilika" comes from Greek: Τὰ Βασιλικά meaning "Imperial Laws" and not from the Emperor Basil's name, which though shares the etymology "imperial".

Lucius Octavius Cornelius Publius Salvius Iulianus Aemilianus, generally referred to as Salvius Julianus, or Julian the Jurist, or simply Julianus, was a well known and respected jurist, public official, and politician who served in the Roman imperial state. Of north African origin, he was active during the long reigns of the emperors Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, and Marcus Aurelius, as well as the shorter reign of Marcus Aurelius' first co-Emperor, Lucius Verus.

Fred Heinrich Blume, or Fred H. Blume, as he referred to himself, was a German-born American attorney and judge. He served as a justice of the Wyoming Supreme Court for 42 years, from 1922 to 1963, and by himself translated from Latin into English the Codex Justinianus and the Novels, two parts of the Corpus Juris Civilis.

Aurelius Hermogenianus, or Hermogenian, was an eminent Roman jurist and public servant of the age of Diocletian and his fellow tetrarchs.

The Novellae Constitutiones, or Justinian's Novels, are now considered one of the four major units of Roman law initiated by Roman emperor Justinian I in the course of his long reign. The other three pieces are: the Codex Justinianus, the Digest, and the Institutes. Justinian's quaestor Tribonian was primarily responsible for compiling these last three. Together, the four parts are known as the Corpus Juris Civilis. Whereas the Code, Digest, and Institutes were designed by Justinian as coherent works, the Novels are diverse laws enacted after 534 that never were officially compiled during his reign.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles S. Lobingier</span> American jurist and judge (1866 – 1956)

Charles Sumner Lobingier was an American jurist who served as a judge of the Philippine Court of First Instance from 1904 to 1914 and as Judge of the United States Court for China in Shanghai from 1914 to 1924. He was also the author of a number of books on international and comparative law.

Clyde Pharr was an American classics professor at Ohio Wesleyan University, Southwestern Presbyterian University, Vanderbilt University, and, finally, at the University of Texas at Austin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samuel Parsons Scott</span> American lawyer (1846–1929)

Samuel Parsons Scott, known as S. P. Scott, was an American attorney, banker and scholar. He was born in Hillsboro, Ohio, where he received a classics-based education at the Hillsboro Academy; he went on to earn his A.B. degree from the Miami University in 1868, was elected to Phi Beta Kappa, and obtained his A.M. degree from the same institution the following year. Scott was licensed to practice law in 1868 and was an attorney for several years in Leavenworth, Kansas and in San Francisco, but he left the practice of law in 1875 to return to Hillsboro and the family banking business. Thereafter, he also traveled in Europe, studied, and wrote. Late in his life, he served for many years on the editorial staff of the American Bar Association's Comparative Law Bureau.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law school of Berytus</span> Ancient school of Roman law, to 551 AD

The law school of Berytus was a center for the study of Roman law in classical antiquity located in Berytus. It flourished under the patronage of the Roman emperors and functioned as the Roman Empire's preeminent center of jurisprudence until its destruction in AD 551.

<i>Institutes</i> (Justinian) Sixth century codification of Roman law

The Institutes is a component of the Corpus Juris Civilis, the 6th-century codification of Roman law ordered by the Byzantine emperor Justinian I. It is largely based upon the Institutes of Gaius, a Roman jurist of the second century A.D. The other parts of the Corpus Juris Civilis are the Digest, the Codex Justinianus, and the Novellae Constitutiones.

References

  1. ↑ "Codex Justiniani I-IX, cum glosa /Franciscus Accursius, Guido de Suzaria ... e.a.[manuscript]". lib.ugent.be. Retrieved 2020-08-26.
  2. ↑ Patrick, David; Geddie, William (1923). Chambers's Encyclopaedia: A Dictionary of Universal Knowledge. p. 324.
  3. ↑ See generally, Honoré, 2003
  4. 1 2 Jolowicz, 1972, p. 463
  5. ↑ Jolowicz, 1972, p. 479.
  6. ↑ Caroline Humfress, "Law and Legal Practice in the Age of Justinian," in The Age of Justinian 161, 163 (Michael Maas ed. 2005). Humfress also describes the diverse forms of imperial enactments that were included.
  7. ↑ Honoré, 2003, supra note 1
  8. ↑ Honoré, 2003, supra note 1 at 803
  9. ↑ Humfress, supra note 5 at 165, quoting the Constitutio Summa.
  10. ↑ Honoré, supra note 1 at 804. For an English translation of the law putting this second edition into force, see "Concerning the Correction of the Justinian Code, and the Second Edition Thereof" (November 16, 534), translated by Justice Fred Blume in the Annotated Justinian Code at page 4.
  11. ↑ Wolfgang Kunkel, An Introduction to Roman Legal and Constitutional History 166 (J.M. Kelly trans. 2nd ed. 1973).
  12. ↑ Jolowicz, 1972, supra note 2 at 494.
  13. ↑ Jolowicz, 1972, supra note 2 at 495
  14. ↑ Stephen L. Sass, Research in Roman Law; a Guide to the Sources and Their English Translations, 56 Law Library Journal 210, 225 (1963).
  15. ↑ Charles M. Radding & Antonio Ciaralli, The Corpus Iuris Civilis in the Middle Ages: Manuscripts and Transmissions from the Sixth Century to the Juristic Revival 133 (2007); pages 133–168 give a detailed account of the Code's transmission in this period.
  16. ↑ A. Arthur Schiller, Roman law, Mechanisms of Development 37 (1978).
  17. ↑ Jolowicz, 1972, supra note 2 at 496.
  18. ↑ Krueger, Paul (1877), Codex iustinianus (in German).
  19. ↑ The Civil Law including the Twelve Tables, the Institutes of Gaius, the Rules of Ulpian, the Enactments of Justinian, and the Constitutions of Leo..., 17 vols. (1932). Reprinted in 1973 by the AMS Press.
  20. ↑ Timothy Kearley, "Justice Fred Blume and the Translation of Justinian's Code".
  21. ↑ Each of the units of Mommsen, Krüger, Schoell and Kroll CJC Archived 2013-04-06 at the Wayback Machine .
  22. ↑ Miller and Kearley (2013) A selective English translation of Kroll's Preface to Novels.
  23. ↑ W.W. Buckland, "Book Review," 7 Tulane Law Review 627, 629 (1932–33).
  24. ↑ See Kearley, supra note 18.
  25. ↑ "Blume and Justinian". Uwyo.edu. Retrieved October 26, 2016. For further discussion of the work of Scott, Blume, and Clyde Pharr on Roman law translation see Kearley, Timothy G., "From Rome to the Restatement: S.P. Scott, Fred Blume, Clyde Pharr, and Roman Law in Early Twentieth-Century". See also Timothy G. Kearley, Roman Law, Classical Education, and Limits on Classical Participation in America into the Twentieth-Century (Fort Collins, CO: Veterrimus Publishing, 2022).
  26. ↑ Bruce W. Frier (General Editor), Serena Connolly, Simon Corcoran, Michael Crawford, John Noël Dillon, Dennis P. Kehoe, Noel Lenski, Thomas A.J. McGinn, Charles F. Pazdernik, and Benet Salway, with contributions by T. Kearley. (2016), The Codex of Justinian. A New Annotated Translation, with Parallel Latin and Greek Text (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), p. 2963, ISBN   9780521196826

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.