She is the author of eight murder mystery novels,featuring Washington congressional aide Kit Marshall, [10] with titles that include Stabbing in the Senate,Homicide in the House,and Larceny at the Library. [3] "They're puzzles,and I like to solve puzzles",she said in 2023 about her novels. [11]
National Archives and Records Administration
On August 13,2022,President Joe Biden nominated Shogan to be 11th Archivist of the United States. [8]
The U.S. Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee held two hearings to consider Shogan's nomination. The first hearing was held on September 21,2022,and the panel were deadlocked on her nomination by a 7–7 party-line vote and did not advance Shogan's nomination. [12] The second hearing was held February 28,2023. [13] On March 15,2023,the committee advanced Shogan's nomination by an 8–4 vote. [14]
During the hearings,Shogan stated that she would not publish the Equal Rights Amendment as part of the United States Constitution,stating that the job of the archivist is to publish constitutional amendments following proper ratification,not to decide when an amendment is published, [15] in line with a Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel memo on the subject in January 2020. [16] Shogan's views were criticized by the ERA Coalition. [17] Shogan also pledged to reduce the backlog of "over 300,000 veterans' records requests",calling it the "most important discrete problem" facing her, [18] and said she would be looking for ways to declassify older historical records. [19] [18] She further promised transparency on records related to the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago, [20] committed to working with U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff on Civil Rights Cold Cases, [21] stated that she would "welcome all Americans to the National Archives" if confirmed, [22] and said she would serve in a "nonpartisan,apolitical capacity". [23] In her opening statement at the September 2022 hearing,she also pledged to find "creative ways" to make the National Archives and Records Administration more efficient,build upon existing public-private partnerships,and engage underrepresented groups in "meaningful ways". [24]
On May 4,2023,the United States Senate invoked cloture on Shogan's nomination by a 53–44 vote. [25] On May 10,2023,Shogan was confirmed as the 11th Archivist of the United States by a 52–45 vote, [26] [27] with her term beginning the following week. [8] She was sworn in and began work on May 17,2023,with her first briefing focused on addressing the "backlog of veterans’records" and speaking with National Personnel Records Center leaders. [28] On January 24,2024,the National Archives announced the elimination of the "pandemic-related backlog of veteran records" at the National Personnel Records Center. [29] Shogan is the first woman appointed as Archivist of the United States. [30]
On December 17,2024,Shogan,and the Deputy Archivist,William J. Bosanko,issued a public statement refusing to publish the Equal Rights Amendment,despite push from 120 Congressional Democratic representatives,like Cori Bush and Ayanna Pressley,stating that neither they,nor Joe Biden could act without congressional or legal action lifting the ratification deadline. [31] Later,on January 17,2025,President Biden declared that the ERA had "been ratified" and part of the U.S. Constitution,which had no legal effect on the amendment's ratification,and a senior official,quoted by the Associated Press,stated that Biden did not direct Shogan to certify the amendment. [32] [33]
On January 6,2025,President-elect Donald Trump stated in a phone interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt that he intends to replace Shogan as head of the National Archives,saying "we will have a new archivist." [34] On February 6,ABC News reported that Marco Rubio had been the Acting Archivist of the United States since the inauguration of Donald Trump on January 20. [35] Later reporting by 404 Media stated that this reporting was misunderstanding,faulty,or a "bad news source," quoting an unnamed National Archives employee,and noted that Shogan was still listed as Archivist of the United States,pointing to an all-hands meeting of National Archives on February 4,where she stated that the agency will implement the guidance of the new administration,is learning about new complex orders,and taking actions "under tight deadlines." [36]
On February 7,2025,Sergio Gor,White House Director of Presidential Personnel,announced on social media that Shogan had been removed as Archivist of the United States. CNN reported that although Donald Trump wanted to replace her,she did not know she would be removed so quickly,and was reportedly surprised when informed. [2] Shogan stated on her personal LinkedIn page that Donald Trump had fired her,asserted that "no cause or reason was cited," and noting she had "zero regrets...[and] did [her]...best...for the National Archives and the American people." [37] [38] [39] The American Historical Association (AHA) and Society of American Archivists (SAA) released statements critical of Shogan's removal. The AHA's executive director,James Grossman,requested that the White House comply with federal law (U.S. Code Title 44,Chapter 21,section 2103) and inform the U.S. Congress of the reasons that Shogan was dismissed,and added that "democracy rests on the rule of law...history of the United States rests on unfettered access to the archival record." [40]
The SAA leadership described the removal of Shogan as alarming,saying that her removal with "no stated cause does harm to our nation and its people," stated that the organization would continue to support the mission of the National Archives,noted that the organization would continue to monitor the situation at the National Archives,support the National Archives "workers and archivists across the United States" and called upon those reading the statement to contact their legislators and advocate for "the safekeeping of government archives is essential to a free and healthy democracy." [41] The National Archives' former director of litigation,Jason R. Baron,expressed his concern of Shogan's dismissal,telling Politico that "no good reason exists for firing Dr. Shogan,as she has faithfully carried out her duties in a nonpartisan fashion...Dr. Shogan had nothing to do with...the successful return of boxes of presidential records...[from] Mar-a-Lago." [42]
Censorship allegations
In October 2024,the Wall Street Journal reported that Shogan and her top advisers had censored numerous displays at the National Archives' museum in an effort to de-emphasize negative parts of U.S. history,according to documents,and current and former employees. According to the article,Shogan and her top aides,like Ellis Brachman,ordered the removal of images of Martin Luther King,Jr.,Dolores Huerta,and Minnie Spotted-Wolf from the Discovery Center wing of the National Archives Museum,images by Dorothea Lange of Japanese-American concentration camps,cut information about the negative environmental effects of coal mining and the forced removal and incarceration of Japanese-Americans from various exhibits,and directed employees to find "success stories about white people". Shogan was alleged to ask why a museum exhibit on Western expansion was centered on Indigenous people,ordered records showing treaties in which Indigenous tribes ceded "their lands to the U.S. government",and directed that a patent for the contraceptive pill be replaced by a patent for the bump stock,and reportedly said that exhibits should not be pushing a "partisan agenda". It was also asserted that some senior officials who had resigned had blamed Shogan's leadership,with one long-time employee for the archives filing a whistleblower complaint,claiming that "Shogan abused her authority and engaged in censorship",and that she had done too much to "appease Republicans". [43] Brachman asserted,according to Current Affairs,that the story is inaccurate,claiming that "balance was missing in the early planning of some of the new galleries here,and we have had to make some difficult decisions during the planning process" and that some people did not "want to do the hard work to address the nuanced and many layered facts of American history." [44] Brachman also told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency that "the story is not accurate." [45]
Historians and commentators responded to The Wall Street Journal's reporting. The president of Win Without War,Stephen Miles,argued that Shogan's reported action was,"preemptively self-censoring and hiding essential parts of any honest telling of American history",and called it a dereliction of the agency's mission. Author David Neiwert said that Shogan and her advisors need to be replaced,and that she is,"making a travesty of American history." Historian Harvey G. Cohen echoed the same sentiment,stating that the National Archives should be focused on "preserving and presenting the truth" and Timothy D. Snyder called Shogan's reported conduct,"anticipatory obedience". Former Obama administration official Brandon Friedman and Philadelphia Inquirer columnist Will Brunch accused Shogan and her advisors of,"obeying fascism in advance". [46] In an article in Current Affairs,Nathan J. Robinson argued that the National Archives Museum was backsliding into "a sanitized mythological retelling of American history",asserted that Shogan is "intensely worried about being accused of partisanship" and argued that the Archivist of the United States should be "committed to telling a truthful story that reflects what actually happened." [44] On November 1,the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus,Congressional Hispanic Caucus,and Congressional Black Caucus chairs Judy Chu,Nanette Barragán,and Steven Horsford issued a statement which criticized NARA's reported actions,saying that the agency was "preemptively appeas[ing]...conservative interests" and aligning with far-right "book ban movements nationwide",and urged Shogan to restore these references and exhibits to ensure that "NARA and the National Archives Museum tell the full and most accurate story of our nation." [47]
On October 30,2024,Shogan issued a response to the Wall Street Journal's reporting. She restated her "commitment to leading NARA without partisanship or ideology",asserted that federal employees are not there to "promote or share our personal interpretation of the records" but are there,in her view,to "preserve,protect,and share the records with all Americans". She also called the article "misinformed" and said she "strongly disagree[d]" with it,arguing that the article was based on "anonymous complaints about that work and my leadership of the agency" and stated that NARA will remain,in her view,"thoughtful in how we engage with our past and focused on fostering understanding and dialogue",and reprinted her statement which had been sent to the Wall Street Journal. [45]
