![]() | |
Founded | October 2001 |
---|---|
Type | Non-profit NGO |
Location | |
Key people | Jack David (Co-Chair, Board of Directors) Katrina Lantos Swett (Co-Chair, Board of Directors) Greg Scarlatoiu (President & CEO) |
Website | www |
Formerly called | U.S. Committee for Human Rights in North Korea |
The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea (HRNK) is a Washington, D.C.-based non-governmental research organization founded in 2001. [1] [2] [3] [4] It investigates and raises awareness of human rights abuses in North Korea. [5] [6] [7] [8]
HRNK produces in-depth research reports on North Korea’s human rights conditions. Its publications have documented the country’s network of political prison camps through the combined use of satellite imagery and survivor testimony, [9] [10] [11] examined other internal dynamics, [12] [13] [14] [15] and investigated international dimensions such as abductions, illicit activities, terrorism links, and the use of forced labor abroad. [16] [17] [18] [19] [8]
HRNK’s research has been cited by international bodies and governments in their assessments of human rights in North Korea. Reports documenting political prison camps were referenced by the United Nations Commission of Inquiry in its 2014 findings on crimes against humanity, [11] [5] [20] and the U.S. State Department has drawn on HRNK publications in its annual human rights reporting. [21] HRNK’s analyses have also informed policy discussions on sanctions and forced labor, with its work noted in U.S. government guidance on North Korean overseas workers and in debates over targeted measures against the regime. [19] [8] The organization's experts have also provided testimony before U.S. congressional hearings. [22] [23] [24] [25]
HRNK’s mission is to document and raise international awareness of human rights conditions in North Korea, going beyond the broader mandates of larger human rights organizations by focusing exclusively on the DPRK. [26] [27] [28]
According to its leadership, HRNK pursues seven guiding objectives: to close North Korea’s political prison camps, open the country’s borders, inform its citizens, foster sound economic principles, promote outside access, feed the hungry, and link development assistance to human rights improvements. [2] [1] Since its establishment, HRNK has published more than sixty reports and coordinated research with defectors, scholars, and policy experts. [1] [2] [29]
HRNK has been described as a bridge-building organization with members from both liberal and conservative backgrounds, providing a bipartisan platform for research and advocacy on North Korea. [27] [30] [7] [31] Commentators have compared its in-depth reporting with the work of larger groups such as Amnesty International, noting HRNK’s focus on satellite analysis and survivor testimony as a distinguishing feature. [26] [32] The organization’s reports have been recognized as contributing to the evidentiary record of crimes against humanity in the DPRK and informing both scholarship and policy. [33] [34] [35] [36]
HRNK was founded in 2001 as nonprofit based in Washington D.C. by a group of foreign policy and human rights specialists to fill a gap in non-governmental expertise on North Korea. [1] [2] [38] [30] Well-established organizations such as Amnesty International initially found it difficult to incorporate North Korea, about which information was often scarce, into their models of research and advocacy. [26]
In 2003 HRNK released the first edition of The Hidden Gulag by David Hawk, the first comprehensive study of North Korea's prison camp system, which combined defector testimony with satellite imagery to document facilities the government denied existed. [9] [39] [10]
Chuck Downs, a former Pentagon officer focused on North Korea, played a leading role in the early years. [40] Since 2011 HRNK has been directed by Greg Scarlatoiu. [40] [41] [1] [42]
In 2012, HRNK as part of a group of a coalition of nonprofits, called for a more in-depth United Nations-led investigation into human rights conditions in the DPRK. [43] [44] [45] The following year, the UN Human Rights Council established the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the DPRK. [46] [47] HRNK contributed evidence and analysis to the Commission, whose 2014 report concluded that crimes against humanity had been committed in the country. [11] [33] [20] [48] In 2015, HRNK presented Service Awards to the three UN COI leaders. [49] [50]
HRNK is a member of the International Coalition to Stop Crimes Against Humanity in North Korea (ICNK), a global network of NGOs and survivor groups advocating accountability for abuses. [45]
in 2018, after an extended process marked by opposition from some UN member states, [51] [52] [53] HRNK was granted consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), enabling it to participate in UN forums. [54] [55] [56] [57]
HRNK’s application for consultative status at the United Nations was for years repeatedly deferred by the UN Committee on Non-Governmental Organizations before finally being approved. During the review process, member states including Russia and China questioned HRNK’s independence, sources of funding, and asked whether it had acknowledged North Korea’s reported successes in areas such as education and healthcare. [58] The DPRK’s UN mission welcomed the initial rejection of HRNK’s application, describing it as “due punishment” and characterizing the organization’s work as part of a U.S. “human rights racket” against North Korea. [59]
HRNK is known for its research reports, particularly those documenting North Korea’s prison camps by combining satellite imagery with defector testimony. [9] [38] [11] [39] Its publications have also examined the country’s political system, social controls, [60] the songbun social classification system, [61] abductions of foreign nationals, state-linked illicit activities and terrorism, restrictions on access to information, famine, and gender-based repression. [12] [16] [18] [62]
HRNK has engaged directly with U.S., European, and UN policymakers to promote accountability for abuses in North Korea. It has been among the NGOs advocating continued U.S. participation in the UN Human Rights Council and highlighting DPRK abuses in international forums. [63] [64] [31] Its findings have been used by officials in shaping policy discussions on sanctions, human rights, and refugee protection, [28] [65] [66] and are cited in the U.S. State Department’s annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. [35] [21] [8]
Experts from the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea have been invited to provide expert testimony before U.S. congressional hearings on the situation of defectors in China, [22] [67] [68] the operation of political prison camps, [23] crimes against humanity, [23] forced labor abroad, [69] and the relationship between human rights and security concerns on the Korean Peninsula. [24] Testimony has been delivered among others by HRNK executive director Greg Scarlatoiu, [22] [67] [70] chair Roberta Cohen, [67] [71] co-chair Andrew Natsios, [23] [72] and founding member Nicholas Eberstadt. [24] Their statements have also emphasized the humanitarian consequences of DPRK policies, [71] [73] the importance of information access, [74] and the need for legislative and international action. [75] [25]
HRNK contributed evidence and expertise to the United Nations Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the DPRK, whose 2014 report concluded that crimes against humanity had been committed in the DPRK. [33] [11] [9] [20] The organization also partnered with the International Bar Association’s War Crimes Committee to conduct the Inquiry on Crimes Against Humanity in North Korean Detention Centers, which held hearings and gathered testimony to explore legal avenues for accountability. [76] [77] [78]
Since 2018, HRNK has held consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). [54] [55] [57] [79] This designation allows non-governmental organizations to participate in UN processes, including attending meetings, submitting written statements, and delivering oral interventions at the Human Rights Council and other bodies. [58] [56] NGOs with consultative status may also organize side events, circulate documentation, and provide expert analysis to member states and UN agencies. [58] [80]
HRNK has convened and participated in events in the United States and Europe. [3] These events have addressed North Korea’s political prison camps, [11] abductions of foreign nationals, [16] the country’s social classification system (songbun), [12] the humanitarian consequences of famine, [62] and the relationship between human rights and nuclear policy. [24] HRNK has also hosted discussions with members of the UN Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in North Korea to consider its findings on crimes against humanity, [33] [23] [81] and some of its programs have included testimony from North Korean defectors. [3] In organizing conferneces, panel discussions, and other public events, it has partnered with institutions including the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the Brookings Institution, [82] and Yonsei University. [83] [84] [85] [86]
Since 2003, HRNK has published a series of reports that document different aspects of life and governance in North Korea. These include detailed studies of the country’s political prison camps ( Kwalliso ) and re-education centers ( kyohwaso ), [87] [88] analyses of the songbun social classification system, research on abductions of foreign nationals, and examinations of state-sponsored illicit activities such as drug production and proliferation networks. [89] [16] [12] [18] Other publications have addressed the impact of famine and mismanagement on children’s health, the operation of local governance and social control mechanisms, and the regime’s strategies for restricting access to outside information in the digital age. [62] [15] [90] HRNK has also contributed reports on the relationship between North Korea’s human rights record and international security, including studies of terrorism, forced labor abroad, and accountability under international law. [91] [8] [78] HRNK has released over 60 reports (as of 2025). [92]
Among HRNK’s most notable works are those focused on the DPRK’s political prison camps and gulag system. [93] [94] [95] [10] David Hawk’s The Hidden Gulag (2003, updated 2012) was the first comprehensive study to confirm the location and operation of these camps, combining defector accounts, hand-drawn maps, and satellite imagery. [9] [10] [89] [96] Later reports such as Gulag, Inc. (2016) and The Parallel Gulag (2017) revealed how forced labor in mining, agriculture, and manufacturing formed part of the regime’s economic strategy, while confirming that conditions of malnutrition, overwork, and brutality persisted despite international scrutiny. [97] [98] [99] [100] HRNK’s camp-specific studies, including analyses of Kaechon, Jongori, and Camp 25, offered detailed evidence of prisoner populations, industrial facilities, and attempts by the authorities to camouflage camp activity. [101] [102] [21] [103]
HRNK’s methodological approach has centered on the integration of satellite imagery with defector and survivor testimony, [104] [105] [106] [107] a combination that has allowed researchers to document facilities and practices that the North Korean government continues to deny. [89] [108] [109] [9] Partnerships with commercial imagery providers such as AllSource Analysis, Airbus, and DigitalGlobe have enabled the organization to produce landmark reports that visually confirmed the location, expansion, and concealment of prison camps. [110] [108] [111] [101] Testimonies collected from escapees further corroborated evidence of starvation, torture, forced labor, and executions, [112] [113] [114] [115] while satellite imagery has revealed camp closures near the Chinese border, the expansion of inland facilities, and the use of camouflage and deception to mask operations. [116] [117] [99] [118] [9]
Prison camp reports are presented here by camp number in ascending order. All other reports are sorted in chronological ascending order.
According to HRNK the kwan-li-so (관리소) are political prison camps, also referred to as “total control zones.” HRNK explains that these camps are administered by the Ministry of State Security and used to confine individuals identified as disloyal to the regime, frequently together with their families, often for life without the possibility of release. [119] [102] [106] HRNK has documented that conditions in these facilities include forced labor, chronic food shortages, and systematic abuse, and has reported that crimes against humanity are committed within them. [78] [120] [21] [121]
HRNK identifies the kyo-hwa-so (교화소) as correctional or “re-education” centers that detain persons convicted of criminal, rather than political, offenses. These facilities are generally operated by the Ministry of People’s Security (also translated as the Ministry of Public Security). [98] [122] [109] [119] HRNK reports that despite their official designation, conditions in the kyo-hwa-so are extremely harsh, involving forced labor in industries such as mining, farming, and manufacturing, combined with inadequate food and medical care that contribute to high rates of death among prisoners. [99] [100] [87]
Beyond the prison camp system, HRNK has also produced major reports on wider aspects of North Korean governance and repression inside the country. [12] [96] [62] [123] [19] Robert Collins’s Marked for Life (2012) examined the songbun social classification system as a form of institutionalized discrimination. [12] [96] Lost Generation (2019) focused on the long-term health consequences for children of famine and state policy failures during the 1990s and beyond, documenting how the famine years left a “lost generation” of North Korean children suffering from stunting, wasting, and chronic trauma. [62] [123] [124] [14] These reports highlight how HRNK’s research has broadened beyond prisons to address the structural systems of discrimination, repression, and neglect that shape everyday life in North Korea. [125] [126] [127] [15] [19]
HRNK has also produced reports examining how North Korea’s conduct interacts with the international community and global security concerns. [13] [35] Joshua Stanton’s Arsenal of Terror (2015) argued that the DPRK’s support for international terrorism and illicit activity justified its relisting as a state sponsor of terrorism. [91] [128] [129] [130] [131] Digital Trenches (2019) analyzed the regime’s strategies to block foreign media and suppress outside information, particularly through restrictions on digital devices and surveillance of communications. [90] [132] [119] More recently, joint inquiries with the International Bar Association concluded there was a reasonable basis to investigate Kim Jong-un and other officials for crimes against humanity in detention centers. [78] [21] [2]
The other study, by the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, maps out the chain of command, structures and mechanisms of the Kim regime, and thus sheds light on how targeted sanctions can be most effective in limiting both the North's ability to threaten the outside world and its ability to continue to systematically brutalize its own people. North Korea is a clear case in which security and humanitarian concerns are interrelated, and the Kim regime's human rights record should be placed front and center in American diplomatic activity.
The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea has published devastating reports on North Korean human-rights practices.
The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea (HRNK), which helped arrange the 2017 White House meeting with North Korean defectors, this past week released its latest in a series of authoritative reports laying out the inner workings of the Kim regime's system of oppression. HRNK's work, and that of the United Nations human rights committee, have effectively made the case for regime change in North Korea in one form or another.
For those of us who care about the issue, outstanding organizations such as the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea (HRNK) and the New Korea Women's Union (NKWU) continue to gather valuable information so that we can be aware of the problem.
Where can I find information on which countries are at high risk for North Korean labor?
The State Department regularly reports on countries and sectors hosting North Korean workers in its annual reports, including the Country Reports on Human Rights Practices and Trafficking in Persons Report. In addition, a number of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have conducted extensive research on this topic and have released public reports. These NGOs include the Database Center for North Korean Human Rights, the ASAN Institute, C4ADS, and the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea.
Virtually every legal scholar and former tribunal judge looking at North Korea has come to the conclusion that these are massive crimes against humanity," says David Hawk, a veteran of Cambodia and Rwanda genocide studies and author of the definitive 2012 report on North Korea, "The Hidden Gulag."
David Hawk's 2003 The Hidden Gulag was a landmark in the study of North Korean human rights, which made a forceful appearance in President Trump's speech before the Korean National Assembly. Drawing on a combination of satellite imagery and defector and prison guard testimony, Hawk confirmed the extent of the sprawling political concentration camps in North Korea and the abuses committed in them. Hawk updated the report in 2012 and authored a 2015 study of gender repression and disappearances. The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, the NGO that sponsors Hawk's research (and on whose board of directors my colleague Marc Noland serves) also began working with Joe Bermudez and DigitalGlobe's Analysis Center to launch a series of updates of particular facilities.
the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea (HRNK) released new satellite imagery documenting the vast network of prison camps in the country. This latest report is part of a series of reports revealing the size and scope of political prison camps and ordinary prison camps in North Korea.
There are, in total, 51 grades within the [Songbun] system, according to an in-depth 2012 report by Robert Collins entitled, 'Marked for Life: Songbun, North Korea's Social Classification System,' published by the U.S.-based Committee for Human Rights in North Korea.
Collins describes the system in fascinating detail and identifies two dozen key regime figures who would be prime candidates for U.S. sanctions or international criminal prosecutions if the regime were ever called to account for its human rights violations
A 2011 report from the Washington-based Committee for Human Rights in North Korea gave an even more damning account of North Korean abductions, alleging that North Korea's abductions were more numerous than officially described, and included people of at least 14 different nationalities, kidnapped not only from Japan and South Korea, but from countries such as China, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Malaysia and Thailand
The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea in Washington, D.C. has assembled evidence that Pyongyang has taken citizens of at least 14 countries: South Korea, China, France, Guinea, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Lebanon, Macau, the Netherlands, Malaysia, Romania, Singapore, and Thailand
The other study, by the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, maps out the chain of command, structures and mechanisms of the Kim regime, and thus sheds light on how targeted sanctions can be most effective in limiting both the North's ability to threaten the outside world and its ability to continue to systematically brutalize its own people.
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)The U.S. State Department on Monday released its annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, showing human rights abuses at every level of North Korean society.
The report also pulled information and data from white papers published by foreign governments and third-party human rights groups, including the Transitional Justice Working Group, the Korea Institute for National Unification, the War Crimes Committee of the International Bar Association and the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea.
In 2003 the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, external was the first organisation to publish a comprehensive report on the North's political prison camps. The existence of these camps was verified by matching defector testimony and hand-drawn maps with satellite imagery of the related areas.
The reason for the new/old stalemate is that the three pillars supporting the initial momentum for success have all weakened or been abandoned. Trump and Kim "falling in love" has replaced "fire and fury." China and Russia are subverting the sanctions regime. And the most potent Western weapon — peaceful regime change based on a human rights agenda — has been abandoned even as the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea just issued a chilling new report on the cradle-to-grave inhumanity inflicted on the Kim-tormented population.
A 2014 publication from the Committee for Human Rights in North Korea gave a comprehensive account of how the drug first proliferated within the country. The government established meth production plants as early as the 1970s to drive North Korea's failing economy, amping up efforts after its devastating famine in the late 1990s.