Comprised of

Last updated

Comprised of is an expression in English that means "composed of". [1] This is thought by language purists to be improper because to "comprise" (without the "of") can already mean to "be composed of". By that definition, "comprised of" would be ungrammatical as it implies "composed of of". However, another widely accepted definition of to "comprise" is to "compose", hence the commonly accepted meaning of "comprised of" as "composed of". [2]

Contents

The subtle difference between uses in "the whole which is made up by the parts" and "the parts which makes up the whole" has led to acquiescence among many language professionals who now accept the phrases "comprised of" and "composed of" as equivalent. The Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary , Collins English Dictionary and the Oxford Dictionaries regard the form comprised of as standard English usage. [3] [4] [5] This is predicated on its widespread use in both writing and speech. [6]

Despite this, there continues to be resistance to accepting the phrase "comprised of". In 2015, media outlets reported on one Wikipedia editor's efforts to expunge the phrase from any and all articles on the online encyclopedia. [7]

Use

The phrase comprised of has been in use in its current meaning since the early 18th century, [n 1] and has been used by major novelists, intellectuals and essayists.

Some examples (emphasis added):

Among more recent examples, the Merriam Webster Dictionary attributes "about 8 percent of our military forces are comprised of women" to former US President Jimmy Carter. [1] The phrase has also been used in several newspapers, including The Washington Post, The New Yorker, The Atlantic and The New York Times . [22] [23]

In US patents

Comprised of is used in US patents as a transition phrase that means "consisting at least of". It is a less-common form of comprises. as of 2007, 134,000 U.S. patents included the phrase. [24] [25]

In US law

In the context of legal usage, the American lexicographer Bryan A. Garner writes that "The phrase is comprised of is always wrong and should be replaced by either is composed of or comprises." [26] (American linguist Mark Liberman points out that the U.S. Code "apparently includes some 1,880 instances of 'comprised of', and changing them will require many acts of Congress..." [27] )

Syntax

Although comprise is a verb, comprised is an adjective if it takes as its complement a preposition phrase headed by of. [28] [29] The distinction between the verb comprise (of course including preterite and past participle "comprised") and adjective comprised is perhaps most easily understood via compose(d):

Treatments of this topic nearly always mistakenly speak of is composed of and is comprised of as passives. They aren't. Compose in its musical/literary sense does have a passive (The Moonlight Sonata was composed by Beethoven), but the part/whole sense doesn't. Nobody says *Brass is composed by copper and zinc. Instead we get Brass is composed of copper and zinc – and there is no understood by-phrase. [29]

Specifically, the word comprised in the phrase comprised of is a participial adjective. [n 3] English has a number of adjectives that take as their complements preposition phrases headed by of. Common examples include afraid ("He's afraid of spiders"), aware ("They were aware of the dangers"), and convinced ("They became convinced of their strength"). [n 4]

In the process of conversion from verb to adjective, complementation may change. The verb comprise does not license a preposition phrase headed by of: its meaning aside, *"The book comprises of a hundred pages" is ungrammatical. [n 5] However, the adjective comprised requires it: both *"The book is comprised a hundred pages" and *"The book is comprised" are ungrammatical. Grammatically, this is patterned on the conversion of verb compose to adjective composed (although semantically, matters are more complex). [28] [29] However, the sentence "the book comprises a hundred pages" is neither ungrammatical nor tautological.

In Malaysian English

In Malaysian English, both the adjective comprised and the verb comprise can take a preposition phrase headed by of, as in: "According to our analysis, the voters comprise of 297 Malays, 469 Chinese, 39 Indians and four from other races". [30]

Semantics

The Oxford English Dictionary (OED) shows that the verb comprise has been used with a range of meanings. In its earliest known uses (from 1423), it seems to mean "To lay hold on, take, catch, seize", a sense now obsolete. The word comes from French comprendre (which itself comes from Latin), but while the OED does not call obsolete every comprehension-related sense of comprise, its newest examples are from the 1850s. The OED presents "Of things material: To contain, as parts making up the whole, to consist of (the parts specified)" as the fourth sense, first encountered in 1481. (However, it notes that "Many of the early passages in which this word occurs are so vague that it is difficult to gather the exact sense.") In the English of the 20th and 21st centuries, the part/whole meanings have been overwhelmingly important. Two are exemplified in:

  1. "The committee comprises three judges."
  2. %"Three judges comprise the committee". [n 6]

The former is not disputed. The latter is less common, and is disputed. It may be the result of a centuries-old malapropism for compose, a malapropism that caught on. Malapropism or no, it is now well established. [29] The OED gives use 8.b of comprise as "to constitute, make up, compose", and dates this back to 1794; and it has been used by respected writers (for example, Charles Dickens [31] ).

One may say "The committee is composed of three judges", and also "Three judges compose the committee". Although the former is not a passive clause (as explained in "Syntax", above), it behaves like one semantically.

However, with the meaning of comprise that is the commonest (and is not disputed), the parallel pair is not possible for comprise(d). Instead, it is only possible for the pair %"The committee is comprised of three judges", and %"Three judges comprise the committee", both disputed. (Very few native speakers of Standard English would accept *"Three judges are comprised of the committee".) [29]

Evaluations

Comprised of is often deprecated. The authors of The Blue Book of Grammar and Punctuation state that comprised of is never correct because the word comprise by itself already means "composed of". [6] CliffsNotes says "don't use the phrase 'is comprised of'" and does not include an explanation. [32] [n 7]

The acceptance of the phrase has increased in recent decades. In the 1960s, 53 percent of the writers and editors on the Usage Panel of the American Heritage Dictionary found comprised of unacceptable. In 1996, this percentage had declined to 35 percent, and by 2011, only 32 percent of the Usage Panel's membership objected to the use of comprised of. [33] [34]

As one of "7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to", University of Delaware journalism and English professor Ben Yagoda says "Don't use comprised of. Instead use composed of/made up of." [35]

The style guide for the British newspapers The Guardian and The Observer says that "The one thing [about comprise, consist, compose or constitute] to avoid, unless you want people who care about such things to give you a look composed of, consisting of and comprising mingled pity and contempt, is 'comprised of'". [36] Reuters' style guide also advises against using the phrase, [37] as does the IBM style guide. [38]

Simon Heffer elaborated on a short warning in his book Strictly English [39] with a longer one in his Simply English: "A book may comprise fifteen chapters, but it is not comprised of them. Those who say or write such a thing are confusing it with composed of. Another correct way to make the point would be to say that the book 'was constituted of fifteen chapters' or that 'the fifteen chapters constituted the book'." [40]

Certain usage guides warn their readers about the meaning of comprise – despite the appearance within respected dictionaries of the use they deprecate (see "Semantics") – but do not mention comprised of. These include Gowers and Fraser's The Complete Plain Words [41] and the style guides of The Economist [42] and The Times . [43] Other usage compendia have no comment on either comprised of or comprise. [n 8] Although the Oxford English Dictionary notes that certain usages of other words are disparaged, [n 9] it does not comment on the acceptability of comprised of (which it glosses as "To be composed of, to consist of").

Overt defenses of comprised of are uncommon, but Harvard University psychology professor Steven Pinker considers its deprecation to be one of "a few fuss-budget decrees you can safely ignore". [44] Oliver Kamm defends it, together with the verb comprise used in the active voice: [n 10] "Merriam-Webster observes that this disputed usage has been in existence for more than a century. The active version of the disputed usage is older still. Neither is unclear in the context; both are legitimate." [45] Conversely, Edinburgh University linguistics professor Geoffrey K. Pullum writes "I'd happily comply with an edict limiting comprise to its original sense … I see no reason to favor the inverted sense. [n 11] There’s nothing virtuous about the ambiguity and auto-antonymy it promotes. It's easier than you’d think for unclarity to arise about whether an author is saying some abstract X makes up Y or that it consists of Y." [29]

Variants

According to the Oxford Dictionaries, the related construction "x comprises of y and z" is considered incorrect. [46]

Removal from Wikipedia

In 2015, many media outlets, starting with Backchannel , reported that Wikipedia editor Bryan Henderson had manually removed tens of thousands of instances of the phrase comprised of from the encyclopedia. [47] Some coverage praised the work as a uniquely focused effort for correctness, [48] but others criticized it as grammatically misguided. [27] [49] Linguist Geoffrey K. Pullum expressed approval of the principle but also doubt about its practicality, saying he would be happy for the editor's "clarifying mission" to succeed. However, Pullum said he "wouldn't bet a dime on his success." [29] Fellow linguist Geoffrey Nunberg has described Henderson's ongoing efforts against the use of the phrase as a "jihad" and an "example of the pedant's veto", and said that the Wikipedia community was "resigned to letting him have his way" despite his mission being illogical. [50]

Notes

  1. ↑ With what is likely to have been a different meaning, it goes back to 1661 if not earlier. See David Russinoff, Mark Liberman, and commenters, "More on the history of comprised of meaning 'composed of'", Language Log, 6 June 2011.
  2. ↑ see Mark Liberman, "Counterfeit cultural capital", Language Log, 11 May 2011. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
  3. ↑ For the distinction between participial adjectives (e.g. uninvolved, also called adjectival participles) and past participles (e.g. enjoyed), see Rodney Huddleston, "The Verb", chap. 3 of Huddleston and Pullum, The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002; ISBN   0-521-43146-8), pp. 78–79; and "Participial adjectives", The Internet Grammar of English, University College London. See also the discussion of the adjectival passive in Gregory Ward, Betty Birner and Rodney Huddleston, "Information packaging", chap. 16 of The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , pp. 1436–1440. For a more detailed and technical treatment, see Andrew McIntyre, "Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English", in Artemis Alexiadou and Florian Schäfer, eds., Non-Canonical Passives (Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2013; ISBN   9789027255884); McIntyre's paper is also freely downloadable here (Lingbuzz). The notion of participial adjective is not new; it can be found in for example Simon Kerl, A Common-School Grammar of the English Language (New York, 1866); here at HathiTrust.
  4. ↑ A non-exhaustive list of fifty or so such adjectives appears in Pullum and Huddleston, "Adjectives and adverbs", chap. 6 of Huddleston and Pullum, The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, p. 544.
  5. ↑ By linguistics convention, an asterisk in front of a putative sentence or phrase denotes its ungrammaticality to native speakers of the language.
  6. ↑ By linguistics convention, a superscripted percentage mark in front of a putative sentence or phrase denotes its grammaticality to some but not all native speakers of the language.
  7. ↑ This has not led to the removal of comprised of by CliffsNotes' own copyeditors. See for example its occurrences within BTPS Testing, CliffsNotes GMAT with CD-ROM (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012; ISBN   978-1-118-07752-8).
  8. ↑ As an example, H. W. Fowler, A Dictionary of Modern English Usage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1937). Derivative works may differ. For example, Margaret Nicholson, A Dictionary of American-English Usage: Based on Fowler's Modern English Usage (New York: New American Library, 1958) states that comprise "means include, embrace, NOT compose or constitute. WRONG: The committee is comprised of one delegate from each major country (should read composed)."
  9. ↑ As an example, the earliest use of disinterested ("Without interest or concern; not interested, unconcerned") is "Often regarded as a loose use".
  10. ↑ As an example of the latter, Kamm quotes Herman Melville in Moby Dick : "Nor do heroes, saints, demigods, and prophets alone comprise the whole roll of our order."
  11. ↑ "Unfortunately, for centuries the verb comprise has also been used to mean compose. I'll call this the inverted sense."

Related Research Articles

Singular <i>they</i> Gender-neutral English pronoun

Singular they, along with its inflected or derivative forms, them, their, theirs, and themselves, is a gender-neutral third-person pronoun. It typically occurs with an indeterminate antecedent, to refer to an unknown person, or to refer to every person of some group, in sentences such as:

In grammar, a noun is a word that represents a concrete or abstract thing, such as living creatures, places, actions, qualities, states of existence, and ideas. A noun may serve as an object or subject within a phrase, clause, or sentence.

English grammar is the set of structural rules of the English language. This includes the structure of words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and whole texts.

A noun phrase – or NP or nominal (phrase) – is a phrase that usually has a noun or pronoun as its head, and has the same grammatical functions as a noun. Noun phrases are very common cross-linguistically, and they may be the most frequently occurring phrase type.

In linguistics, a modifier is an optional element in phrase structure or clause structure which modifies the meaning of another element in the structure. For instance, the adjective "red" acts as a modifier in the noun phrase "red ball", providing extra details about which particular ball is being referred to. Similarly, the adverb "quickly" acts as a modifier in the verb phrase "run quickly". Modification can be considered a high-level domain of the functions of language, on par with predication and reference.

In linguistics, a participle is a nonfinite verb form that has some of the characteristics and functions of both verbs and adjectives. More narrowly, participle has been defined as "a word derived from a verb and used as an adjective, as in a laughing face".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English auxiliary verbs</span> Small set of grammatically distinctive verbs of English

English auxiliary verbs are a small set of English verbs, which include the English modal auxiliary verbs and a few others. Although the auxiliary verbs of English are widely believed to lack inherent semantic meaning and instead to modify the meaning of the verbs they accompany, they are nowadays classed by linguists as auxiliary on the basis not of semantic but of grammatical properties: among these, that they invert with their subjects in interrogative main clauses and are negated either by the simple addition of not or by negative inflection.

Relative clauses in the English language are formed principally by means of relative words. The basic relative pronouns are who, which, and that; who also has the derived forms whom and whose. Various grammatical rules and style guides determine which relative pronouns may be suitable in various situations, especially for formal settings. In some cases the relative pronoun may be omitted and merely implied.

In grammar, a complement is a word, phrase, or clause that is necessary to complete the meaning of a given expression. Complements are often also arguments.

In linguistics, an adverbial phrase ("AdvP") is a multi-word expression operating adverbially: its syntactic function is to modify other expressions, including verbs, adjectives, adverbs, adverbials, and sentences. Some grammars use the label adverb phrase to denote an adverbial phrase composed entirely of adverbs versus an adverbial phrase, which might not contain an adverb.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English passive voice</span> Grammatical voice in the English language

In English, the passive voice is marked by a subject that is followed by a stative verb complemented by a past participle. For example:

The enemy was defeated. Caesar was stabbed.

In linguistics, a non-finite clause is a dependent or embedded clause that represents a state or event in the same way no matter whether it takes place before, during, or after text production. In this sense, a non-finite dependent clause represents one process as a circumstance for another without specifying the time when it takes place as in the following examples:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English subjunctive</span> English embedded clause type marking non-real possibilities

While the English language lacks distinct inflections for mood, an English subjunctive is recognized in most grammars. Definition and scope of the concept vary widely across the literature, but it is generally associated with the description of something other than apparent reality. Traditionally, the term is applied loosely to cases in which one might expect a subjunctive form in related languages, especially Old English and Latin. This includes conditional clauses, wishes, and reported speech. Modern descriptive grammars limit the term to cases in which some grammatical marking can be observed, nevertheless coming to varying definitions.

In traditional grammar, a subject complement is a predicative expression that follows a copula, which complements the subject of a clause by means of characterization that completes the meaning of the subject.

<i>The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language</i> 2002 compendium on the English language

The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CamGEL) is a descriptive grammar of the English language. Its primary authors are Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum. Huddleston was the only author to work on every chapter. It was published by Cambridge University Press in 2002 and has been cited more than 8,000 times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English prepositions</span> Prepositions in the English language

English prepositions are words – such as of, in, on, at, from, etc. – that function as the head of a prepositional phrase, and most characteristically license a noun phrase object. Semantically, they most typically denote relations in space and time. Morphologically, they are usually simple and do not inflect. They form a closed lexical category.

In linguistics, an absolute construction is a grammatical construction standing apart from a normal or usual syntactical relation with other words or sentence elements. It can be a non-finite clause that is subordinate in form and modifies an entire sentence, an adjective or possessive pronoun standing alone without a modified substantive, or a transitive verb when its object is implied but not stated. The term absolute derives from Latin absolūtum, meaning "loosened from" or "separated".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English nouns</span> Part of speech

English nouns form the largest category of words in English, both in the number of different words and how often they are used in typical texts. The three main categories of English nouns are common nouns, proper nouns, and pronouns. A defining feature of English nouns is their ability to inflect for number, as through the plural –s morpheme. English nouns primarily function as the heads of noun phrases, which prototypically function at the clause level as subjects, objects, and predicative complements. These phrases are the only English phrases whose structure includes determinatives and predeterminatives, which add abstract-specifying meaning such as definiteness and proximity. Like nouns in general, English nouns typically denote physical objects, but they also denote actions, characteristics, relations in space, and just about anything at all. Taken all together, these features separate English nouns from other lexical categories such as adjectives and verbs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English possessive</span> Possessive words and phrases in the English language

In English, possessive words or phrases exist for nouns and most pronouns, as well as some noun phrases. These can play the roles of determiners or of nouns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English adjectives</span> Adjectives in the English language

English adjectives form a large open category of words in English which, semantically, tend to denote properties such as size, colour, mood, quality, age, etc. with such members as other, big, new, good, different, Cuban, sure, important, and right. Adjectives head adjective phrases, and the most typical members function as modifiers in noun phrases. Most adjectives either inflect for grade or combine with more and most to form comparatives and superlatives. They are characteristically modifiable by very. A large number of the most typical members combine with the suffix -ly to form adverbs. Most adjectives function as complements in verb phrases, and some license complements of their own.

References

  1. 1 2 "Comprise". Merriam Webster Dictionary. Retrieved 5 February 2015.
  2. ↑ "Can You Use 'Comprised of'?". www.merriam-webster.com. Retrieved 8 July 2023.
  3. ↑ "Comprise". Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  4. ↑ "Definition of 'comprise'". Collins English Dictionary. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
  5. ↑ "Comprise". Oxford Dictionaries. Archived from the original on 25 November 2016. Retrieved 11 February 2019.
  6. 1 2 Straus, Jane; Kaufman, Lester; Stern, Tom (2014). The Blue Book of Grammar and Punctuation: An Easy-to-Use Guide with Clear Rules, Real-World Examples, and Reproducible Quizzes (11th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN   978-1-118-78556-0.
  7. ↑ "Don't You Dare Use 'Comprised Of' On Wikipedia: One Editor Will Take It Out". NPR.org. Retrieved 22 November 2021.
  8. ↑ John Norris, An essay towards the theory of the ideal or intelligible world. Design'd for two parts: The first considering it absolutely in it self, and the second in relation to human understanding (London, 1704), part II (Being the relative part of it), § 43, p. 53; here at Google Books.
  9. ↑ W. [William] Goodall, The adventures of Capt. Greenland: Written in imitation of all those wise, learned, witty and humorous authors, who either already have, or hereafter may write in the same stile and manner (London, 1752), vol. 1, p. 30; here at Google Books.
  10. ↑ J. [John] Shillibeer, A Narrative of the Briton's Voyage, to Pitcairn's Island; Including an Interesting Sketch of the Present State of the Brazils and of the Spanish South America, 3rd ed. (London, 1818), p. 140; here at Google Books.
  11. ↑ Richard Dowling, Tempest-Driven: A Romance (London, 1886); here at Project Gutenberg).
  12. ↑ Harry Furniss, The Confessions of a Caricaturist (New York and London, 1902) vol. 1, p. 99; here at Project Gutenberg.
  13. ↑ The Encyclopædia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts Sciences, Literature and General Information , 11th ed., s.v. "Feather"; here at Project Gutenberg.
  14. ↑ Anthony Trollope (1873). "Australia and New Zealand" . Retrieved 10 April 2015.
  15. ↑ Alfred North Whitehead (2010). Process and Reality (1929). Simon and Schuster. ISBN   9781439118368 . Retrieved 10 April 2015.
  16. ↑ Norman Mailer (1968). "The Armies of the Night". Penguin. Retrieved 10 April 2015.
  17. ↑ Lionel Trilling (27 April 2010). Sincerity and Authenticity. Harvard University Press. ISBN   9780674044463 . Retrieved 5 February 2015.
  18. ↑ Bertrand Russell (2014). The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell (1967). Routledge. ISBN   9781317835042 . Retrieved 10 April 2015.
  19. ↑ Harold Bloom (2003). Wallace Stevens. Chelsea House Publishing. ISBN   9780791073896 . Retrieved 10 April 2015.
  20. ↑ Joyce Carol Oates (2014). "Why We Write About Grief". New York Times. Retrieved 26 February 2011.
  21. ↑ Christopher Hitchens (2011). Arguably. McClelland & Stewart. ISBN   9780771041464 . Retrieved 10 April 2015.
  22. ↑ Mark Liberman, "Counterfeit cultural capital", Language Log, 11 May 2011. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  23. ↑ Sambyal, Swati Singh. "This city proves how feasible a zero-landfill model is". The Washington Post. Retrieved 17 August 2018.
  24. ↑ Crouch, Dennis, "'Comprised of' is an open-ended transition", Patently-O 14 October 2007
  25. ↑ "Cias, Inc. v. Alliance Gaming Corp., 504 F. 3d 1356 - Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit 2007 - Google Scholar".
  26. ↑ Garner, Bryan A. (2001). A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p.  187. ISBN   0-19-514236-5.
  27. 1 2 Mark Liberman, "Can 50,000 Wikipedia edits be wrong?", Language Log, 8 February 2015. Retrieved 11 February 2015.
  28. 1 2 Geoffrey K. Pullum, quoted in Michael Quinion, "Comprise redux", World Wide Words. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Geoffrey K. Pullum, "Comprise yourself" Archived 14 February 2015 at the Wayback Machine , Lingua Franca, The Chronicle of Higher Education , 11 February 2015. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
  30. ↑ Tan Siew Imm (2011), "Structural nativisation in Malaysian English: Prepositional verb idiosyncrasies", Southeast Asian Review of English 50(1), pp. 133–151.
  31. ↑ Charles Dickens, Hard Times , chap. 6; here at Project Gutenberg. Retrieved 13 February 2015. "These observations comprise the whole of the case."
  32. ↑ Claudia L Reinhardt, Jean Eggenschwiler (2011). CliffsNotes Writing: Grammar, Usage, and Style Quick Review (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 219. ISBN   978-0-544-18464-0.
  33. ↑ Editors of the American Heritage Dictionary (27 September 2016). 100 Words Almost Everyone Confuses and Misuses. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. p. 25. ISBN   978-0-547-35026-4 . Retrieved 8 April 2021.
  34. ↑ "The American Heritage Dictionary". Houghton Mifflin. 2014. Retrieved 10 April 2015.
  35. ↑ Ben Yagoda, "7 grammar rules you really should pay attention to", The Week (US edition), 14 March 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
  36. ↑ "comprise, consist, compose or constitute?", within "Guardian and Observer style guide: C", theguardian.com, "Last updated: Thursday 5 February 2015 17.40 GMT". Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  37. ↑ "Reuters Style Guide: C". Reuters. Retrieved 18 February 2015. Do not write "comprised of." If listing only some components use "include," e.g., "The European Union includes Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg."
  38. ↑ DeRespinis, Francis; Hayward, Peter; Jenkins, Jana; Laird, Amy; McDonald, Leslie; Radzinski, Eric (2011). The IBM Style Guide: Conventions for Writers and Editors. Upper Saddle River, NJ: IBM Press. p. 316. ISBN   978-0-13-210130-1.
  39. ↑ Simon Heffer, Strictly English: The Correct Way to Write … and Why It Matters (London: Random House, 2011; ISBN   978-1-84794-630-0), p. 153; here at Google Books. "A book may comprise fifteen chapters, but is not comprised of them."
  40. ↑ Simon Heffer, Simply English: An A–Z of Avoidable Errors (London: Random House, 2014; ISBN   978-1-84794-676-8); here at Google Books.
  41. ↑ Ernest Gowers, revised by Bruce Fraser, The Complete Plain Words (Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin, 1977; ISBN   0-14-020554-3), pp. 58–59.
  42. ↑ "Style Guide beginning with C", economist.com. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  43. ↑ "Online Style Guide – C", The Times, version of 10 July 2009; archived by the Wayback Machine on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
  44. ↑ Steven Pinker (2014). The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person's Guide to Writing in the 21st Century. New York: Viking. p. 263. ISBN   978-0-670-02585-5.
  45. ↑ Oliver Kamm (2015). Accidence Will Happen: The Non-Pedantic Guide to English Usage. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. p. 155. ISBN   978-0-297-87193-4.
  46. ↑ "comprise verb - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes | Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary at OxfordLearnersDictionaries.com". Sometimes you may see the active form 'comprise of' but this is considered incorrect: The property comprises of bedroom, bathroom and kitchen.
  47. ↑ Andrew McMillen (3 February 2015). "One man's quest to rid Wikipedia of exactly one grammatical mistake". Backchannel. Retrieved 7 February 2015.
  48. ↑
  49. ↑
  50. ↑ Nunberg, Geoff (12 March 2015). "Don't You Dare Use 'Comprised Of' On Wikipedia: One Editor Will Take It Out". Fresh Air . NPR.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.