Country-by-Country Reporting

Last updated

Country-by-Country Reporting (or CbCR, sometimes referred to as Country-by-Country Report or CbC report) is an international initiative pioneered by the OECD. [1] It establishes a reporting standard for multinational enterprises (MNEs) with total consolidated group revenues > EUR 750 million [2] , containing key tax related information, including financial information [3] and information on employees and non-cash tangible assets. Under the OECD rules, the information is to be exchanged between tax authorities of different countries. However, the EU adopted legislation to make the Country-by-Country Reporting publicly available, starting the year after 2024. [4]

Contents

CbCR reporting requirements Country by Country Reporting Requirements.png
CbCR reporting requirements

History

Country-by-Country Reporting was initially proposed in 2003 as an accounting standard. The proposal emanated originally from the Tax Justice Network. [6] The key component was information that would allow reconciliation of financial statements across different national jurisdictions. The initiative was initially considered as utopian [6] and remained unsuccessful, until the Base erosion and profit shifting (OECD project) took it over in the context of combatting tax avoidance. [3] In 2015, Country-by-Country Reporting was formally adopted in Action 13 of OECD’s final report on Base erosion and profit shifting (OECD project). Under Article 13 of the report, MNEs are required to provide information in a standardized format on their international income and tax allocation to national tax authorities. [3]

The OECD initiative led to a growing number of national and internationals proposals built around Country-by-Country Reporting requirements. [7]

Public Country-by-Country Reporting

In a weaker version of the Country-by-Country Reporting, information is exchanged between tax administrations, while remaining confidential to the wider public. Campaigners and commentators have called for a public disclosure of the information contained in the Country-by-Country reports, in order to allow investors to take informed decisions about the tax avoidance of the companies they finance. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission would be in a position to require such disclosure from listed companies. [8]

The UK in 2016 decided to make Country-by-Country Reporting public, however this decision has been reversed in 2020 by Rishi Sunak. [1]

In 2021, the EU adopted new legislation which requires companies to publicly disclose Country-by-Country Reporting. Most EU Member States supported the initiative. [9] Large companies, including non-European multinationals will have to comply with the disclosure rules by mid-2024. [4]

Reception and shortcomings

Country-by-Country Reporting is expected to challenge the administrative capacity of the finance departments of companies subjected to the disclosure requirements. [10]

According to commentators, the OECD Country-by-Country Reporting fails to effectively address tax avoidance, especially as the OECD rules do not require the reports to be made public. The responsibility remains with individual countries to go further and require disclosure of information on obscure tax structures of MNEs. [11] Commentators have also pointed to shortcomings of the EU legislation. The scope of reporting on national profits has been reduced from the initial proposal to only include European countries and certain jurisdictions considered as tax havens, the list of which seems incomplete, as for example Bermuda is excluded. [11] Oxfam expressed concerns in respect of the companies to which the disclosure requirements apply, as only the largest MNEs would fall under the public Country-by-Country Reporting rules. [9]

See also

Related Research Articles

Corporate haven, corporate tax haven, or multinational tax haven is used to describe a jurisdiction that multinational corporations find attractive for establishing subsidiaries or incorporation of regional or main company headquarters, mostly due to favourable tax regimes, and/or favourable secrecy laws, and/or favourable regulatory regimes.

Transfer pricing refers to the rules and methods for pricing transactions within and between enterprises under common ownership or control. Because of the potential for cross-border controlled transactions to distort taxable income, tax authorities in many countries can adjust intragroup transfer prices that differ from what would have been charged by unrelated enterprises dealing at arm’s length. The OECD and World Bank recommend intragroup pricing rules based on the arm’s-length principle, and 19 of the 20 members of the G20 have adopted similar measures through bilateral treaties and domestic legislation, regulations, or administrative practice. Countries with transfer pricing legislation generally follow the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations in most respects, although their rules can differ on some important details.

Tax avoidance is the legal usage of the tax regime in a single territory to one's own advantage to reduce the amount of tax that is payable by means that are within the law. A tax shelter is one type of tax avoidance, and tax havens are jurisdictions that facilitate reduced taxes. Tax avoidance should not be confused with tax evasion, which is illegal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporation tax in the Republic of Ireland</span> Irish corporate tax regime

Ireland's Corporate Tax System is a central component of Ireland's economy. In 2016–17, foreign firms paid 80% of Irish corporate tax, employed 25% of the Irish labour force, and created 57% of Irish OECD non-farm value-add. As of 2017, 25 of the top 50 Irish firms were U.S.–controlled businesses, representing 70% of the revenue of the top 50 Irish firms. By 2018, Ireland had received the most U.S. § Corporate tax inversions in history, and Apple was over one–fifth of Irish GDP. Academics rank Ireland as the largest tax haven; larger than the Caribbean tax haven system.

The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises are recommendations on responsible business conduct addressed by governments to multinational enterprises operating in or from the 50 adhering countries. The Guidelines provide non-binding principles and standards for responsible business conduct in a global context that are consistent with applicable laws and internationally recognised standards.

A tax haven or tax den, is a jurisdiction with very low "effective" rates of taxation for foreign investors. In some traditional definitions, a tax haven also offers financial secrecy. However, while countries with high levels of secrecy but also high rates of taxation, most notably the United States and Germany in the Financial Secrecy Index ("FSI") rankings, can be featured in some tax haven lists, they are not universally considered as tax havens. In contrast, countries with lower levels of secrecy but also low "effective" rates of taxation, most notably Ireland in the FSI rankings, appear in most § Tax haven lists. The consensus on effective tax rates has led academics to note that the term "tax haven" and "offshore financial centre" are almost synonymous.

Netherlands benefits from a strategic geographic location, a world-class economy, a stable political climate, and a skilled workforce. The Netherlands has a large network of tax treaties, a low corporate income tax rate and a full participation exemption for capital gains and profits. These characteristics, in addition to a favorable tax environment, make Netherlands one of the most open economies in the world for multinational corporations (MNCs).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offshore financial centre</span> Corporate-focused tax havens

An offshore financial centre (OFC) is defined as a "country or jurisdiction that provides financial services to nonresidents on a scale that is incommensurate with the size and the financing of its domestic economy."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Double Irish arrangement</span> Irish corporate tax avoidance tool

The Double Irish arrangement was a base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) corporate tax avoidance tool used mostly by United States multinationals since the late 1980s to avoid corporate taxation on non-U.S. profits. It was the largest tax avoidance tool in history and by 2010 was shielding US$100 billion annually in US multinational foreign profits from taxation, and was the main tool by which US multinationals built up untaxed offshore reserves of US$1 trillion from 2004 to 2018. Traditionally, it was also used with the Dutch Sandwich BEPS tool; however, 2010 changes to tax laws in Ireland dispensed with this requirement.

The Financial Secrecy Index (FSI) is a report published by the advocacy organization Tax Justice Network (TJN) which ranks countries by financial secrecy indicators, weighted by the economic flows of each country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Base erosion and profit shifting</span> Multinational tax avoidance tools

Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) refers to corporate tax planning strategies used by multinationals to "shift" profits from higher-tax jurisdictions to lower-tax jurisdictions or no-tax locations where there is little or no economic activity, thus "eroding" the "tax-base" of the higher-tax jurisdictions using deductible payments such as interest or royalties. For the government, the tax base is a company's income or profit. Tax is levied as a percentage on this income/profit. When that income / profit is transferred to another country or tax haven, the tax base is eroded and the company does not pay taxes to the country that is generating the income. As a result, tax revenues are reduced and the government is detained. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) define BEPS strategies as "exploiting gaps and mismatches in tax rules". While some of the tactics are illegal, the majority are not. Because businesses that operate across borders can utilize BEPS to obtain a competitive edge over domestic businesses, it affects the righteousness and integrity of tax systems. Furthermore, it lessens deliberate compliance, when taxpayers notice multinationals legally avoiding corporate income taxes. Because developing nations rely more heavily on corporate income tax, they are disproportionately affected by BEPS.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LuxLeaks</span> Financial scandal revealed in November 2014

Luxembourg Leaks is the name of a financial scandal revealed in November 2014 by a journalistic investigation conducted by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. It is based on confidential information about Luxembourg's tax rulings set up by PricewaterhouseCoopers from 2002 to 2010 to the benefits of its clients. This investigation resulted in making available to the public tax rulings for over three hundred multinational companies based in Luxembourg.

The OECD G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project is an OECD/G20 project to set up an international framework to combat tax avoidance by multinational enterprises ("MNEs") using base erosion and profit shifting tools. The project, led by the OECD's Committee on Fiscal Affairs, began in 2013 with OECD and G20 countries, in a context of financial crisis and tax affairs. Currently, after the BEPS report has been delivered in 2015, the project is now in its implementation phase, 116 countries are involved including a majority of developing countries. During two years, the package was developed by participating members on an equal footing, as well as widespread consultations with jurisdictions and stakeholders, including business, academics and civil society. And since 2016, the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS provides for its 140 members a platform to work on an equal footing to tackle BEPS, including through peer review of the BEPS minimum standards, and monitoring of implementation of the BEPS package as a whole.

International tax planning also known as international tax structures or expanded worldwide planning (EWP), is an element of international taxation created to implement directives from several tax authorities following the 2008 worldwide recession.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting</span>

The Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, sometime abbreviated BEPS multilateral instrument, is a multilateral convention of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development to combat tax avoidance by multinational enterprises (MNEs) through prevention of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). The BEPS multilateral instrument was negotiated within the framework of the OECD G20 BEPS project and enables countries and jurisdictions to swiftly modify their bilateral tax treaties to implement some of the measures agreed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conduit and sink OFCs</span> Classification of tax havens

Conduit OFC and sink OFC is an empirical quantitative method of classifying corporate tax havens, offshore financial centres (OFCs) and tax havens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Apple's EU tax dispute</span> Tax dispute involving Apple, Ireland, and the EU

Apple's EU tax dispute refers to an investigation by the European Commission into tax arrangements between Apple and Ireland, which allowed the company to pay close to zero corporate tax over 10 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feargal O'Rourke</span> Managing Partner of PwC, Dublin

Feargal O'Rourke is an Irish accountant and corporate tax expert, who is the managing partner of PwC in Ireland. He is considered the architect of the Double Irish tax scheme used by U.S. firms such as Apple, Google and Facebook in Ireland, and a leader in the development of corporate tax planning tools, and tax legislation, for U.S. multinationals in Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ireland as a tax haven</span> Allegation that Ireland facilitates tax base erosion and profit shifting

Ireland has been labelled as a tax haven or corporate tax haven in multiple financial reports, an allegation which the state has rejected in response. Ireland is on all academic "tax haven lists", including the § Leaders in tax haven research, and tax NGOs. Ireland does not meet the 1998 OECD definition of a tax haven, but no OECD member, including Switzerland, ever met this definition; only Trinidad & Tobago met it in 2017. Similarly, no EU–28 country is amongst the 64 listed in the 2017 EU tax haven blacklist and greylist. In September 2016, Brazil became the first G20 country to "blacklist" Ireland as a tax haven.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global minimum corporate tax rate</span> Proposed international tax scheme

The global minimum corporate tax rate, or simply the global minimum tax, is a minimum rate of tax on corporate income internationally agreed upon and accepted by individual jurisdictions. Each country would be eligible to a share of revenue generated by the tax. The aim is to reduce tax competition between countries and discourage multinational corporations (MNC) from profit shifting to achieve tax avoidance.

References

  1. 1 2 Elliott, Larry (15 November 2022). "Global corporations 'cheating public out of billions in tax', say campaigners". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  2. ↑ OECD, OECD (1 October 2022). "Guidance on the Implementation of Country-by-Country Reporting" (PDF). OECD. Retrieved 24 June 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. 1 2 3 Brockman, Keith (29 September 2020). "Country-by-Country Tax Reporting: Nearly 20 Years in the Making". Bloomberg Tax. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  4. 1 2 "Public EU Country-by-Country reporting: All you need to know in 5 simple questions". Loyens & Loeff. 11 January 2022. Retrieved 5 January 2022.
  5. ↑ OECD, OECD (1 June 2019). "OECD CbCR User Guide for Tax Administrations" (PDF). OECD. Retrieved 24 June 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  6. 1 2 Shaxson, Nicholas (21 December 2020). "Corporate taxation—momentum is building". Social Europe. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  7. ↑ "Bringing tax transparency into focus – extractive industries". International Tax Review. 2 November 2022. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  8. ↑ Boris, Joseph (1 August 2022). "SEC Should Require Public Tax Reporting by U.S. Multinationals, Advocacy Group Says". Thomson Reuters. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  9. 1 2 Boffey, Daniel (26 February 2021). "EU states back plan to expose big companies' tax avoidance" . Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  10. ↑ Peccarelli, Brian (30 December 2022). "For Corporate Finance Pros, 2023 Arrives With Uncertainty And Opportunity". Forbes. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
  11. 1 2 Hyde, Leo (13 October 2022). "Microsoft - Gaming Global Taxes, Winning Government Contracts". Public Services International. Retrieved 5 January 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.