Cytophagales

Last updated

Cytophagales
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Bacteroidota
Class: Cytophagia
Nakagawa 2012 [1]
Order: Cytophagales
Leadbetter 1974 (Approved Lists 1980) [2]
Families [3]
Synonyms
  • Cyclobacteriales Perfiliev & Gabe 1961

Cytophagales is an order of non-spore forming, rod-shaped, Gram-negative bacteria that move through a gliding or flexing motion. [4] These chemoorganotrophs are important remineralizers of organic materials into micronutrients. [5] They are widely dispersed in the environment, found in ecosystems including soil, freshwater, seawater and sea ice. [4] Cytophagales is included in the Bacteroidota phylum. [6]

Contents

Name etymology

The name Cytophagales means 'cell eater', referring to the degradation of cellulose cell walls. [7] 'Cytos' comes from the Ancient Greek noun κῠ́τος (kútos), which refers to a vessel, and a cell in biology. [8] 'Phagien' comes from the Ancient Greek verb φαγεῖν (phageîn), which translates to "to eat". [9]

Biology and biochemistry

General characteristics and biology

Bacteria in Cytophagales are all Gram-negative and non-spore forming. [10] [4] [11] They are non-flagellated, but move by exhibiting a gliding or flexing motion. Cytophagales are all unicellular, with rod-shaped cells that can differ significantly in shape. [10] Cells can be short or long, delicate or stout, and have tapering or rounded ends. Two genera of bacteria in the Cytophagales exhibit a cyclic shape. Many species are pleomorphic, meaning they can alter their biological function, morphology, or mode of reproduction in response to environmental conditions. All bacteria in the Cytophagales are chemoorganotrophs and many of them are able to degrade complex biomacromolecules such as proteins, chitin, pectin, agar, starch, or cellulose. [10] [4] Organisms in Cytophagales can be anaerobic, microaerophilic, capnophilic (CO2-requiring), or facultatively anaerobic. They can be highly abundant and are ubiquitous, and likely play a major role in the turnover of matter in the oceans and on land. [10] Cytophagales form colonies that are highly coloured - often in shades of red, orange, and yellow. In response to a 10% KOH solution, yellow and orange Cytophagales colonies are found to immediately change color to red, purple, or brown; this colour change is possibly due to flexirubin-type pigments. [10] [4] These flexirubin-type pigments have been found only in organisms in the CFB group, so far.

Biochemistry

Biopolymer degradation

Members of the order Cytophagales are organotrophs, producing hydrolytic enzymes that degrade various biopolymers such as chitin, pectin, starch, agar, and cellulose. [5] Few specific species have been identified, but the select few tend to dominate polysaccharide degradation. These biopolymers make up the high molecular mass dissolved organic matter (HMW, DOM), which is in relatively high concentrations in the ocean. [10] DOM uptake is the primary step in the microbial loop, which controls most of the DOM turnover from primary production, supporting vast quantities of oceanic heterotrophic bacteria. Cytophagales species likely play a large role in turnover of organic carbon in nature, as they are found in high quantities in oceanic, freshwater, soil, and even sea-ice environments. [4] This is of considerable scientific interest, with importance in carbohydrate enzymology, oceanography, and microbial studies.

Members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria phylogenetic group are found in high quantities degrading chitin and protein, but are underrepresented compared to various other phylogenetic clusters of bacteria in the degradation of amino acids. [12] In glacial stream water that had been supplemented in allochthonous organic material, Cytophaga-Flavobacteria populations increased six- to eight-fold. [10]

Cellulose degradation

Aerobic cellulose degrading Cytophaga bacteria have been identified on fishing nets made from cotton or hemp used by Japanese fishermen. [13] The cellulose degradation process is hydrolytic, either through a weathering or liquid-type breakdown mechanism.

Cytophaga hutchinsonii is a well-characterized soil bacteria in the order Cytophagales that degrades crystalline cellulose. [14] Cells of C. hutchinsonii are of interest, as their cellulose degradation is not inhibited by glucose. [15] Furthermore, the mechanism of cellulose degradation is novel, as C. hutchinsonii does not encode any cellobiohydrolases, only β-glucosidases, periplasmic endoglucanases, and secreted endoglucanases. [16]

Alkaloid production

Marine bacterial species Catalinamonas alkaloidigena and Mooreia alkaloidigena produce quinoline alkaloids. [17] Colonies of these species appear orange-pink in colour, but do not produce flexirubin-type pigment. Bacteria in the species M. alkaloidigena were first isolated from a marine sediment sample taken off the coast of Palmyra Atoll, the northernmost of the Line islands in the Pacific Ocean, [17]  while C. alkaloidigena was isolated from marine sediments collected from 8-m deep off of Catalina Islands in California, USA. Casein, agar, starch, and chitin hydrolysis have been observed.

These species represent novel families in the order Cytophagales. [4] Alkaloid production is of considerable interest for drug development.

Polycyclic sulfide production

Marine Cytophaga bacterial isolates from the North Sea have been extracted and reveal novel polycyclic volatile sulfides. [18] Polycyclic sulfides have a characteristic smell of diesel fuel.

Several compounds have been identified. An example is tetrathiocane which adopts a twisted chair conformation.

Radiation resistance

Some bacteria in the order Cytophagales are found to be radiation resistant. [19] Rhodocytophaga rosea and Nibribacter ruber are bacteria species first isolated from a soil environment in Korea. They contain novel radiation resistance genes. DNA excision repair pathways were present, including the RecA repair protein. The strains show survival rates of 71% and 4% after UV exposure of 300J/m^2, compared to the 0% rate of survival for E. coli species.

Flexirubin in Cytophagales

Flexirubin was initially isolated as a new pigment from Flexibacter elegans by Reinbach et al. in 1974. [20] It has been found in many other bacteria within Flavobacteriales and Cytophagales. (While flexirubin is thought to be unique to the CFB group, organisms in this group contain other carotenoid pigments in addition to flexirubin.) Flexirubin is a non-carotenoid structure and can be easily recognized by its characteristic mass spectrometric fragmentation pattern. [20] [21] Each genera of bacteria produce specifically modified species of flexirubin, which are useful as chemosystematic markers. [21] The production of flexirubin-type pigments is correlated with cell growth- resting cells do not produce these pigments. The function of flexirubin was studied by Xinfeng et al. (2017), who isolated the fabZ gene in Cytophaga hutchinsonii. [22] FabZ is an essential gene for flexirubin pigment synthesis. The FabZ mutant that failed to produce flexirubin was more sensitive to UV radiation, oxidative stress, and alkaline stress than the wild type. Flexirubin has conjugated double bonds that absorb light and hydroxyphenyl in the chromophore, which give the bacteria their characteristic colour- yellow under neutral pH and red under alkaline conditions. Flexirubin-type pigments have even been used traditionally as a bioproduct; they are an eco-friendly natural colorant. [21] Flexirubin-type pigments are also currently being assessed by the scientific community for their potential for therapeutic uses and applicability in the food and textile industry.

Ecology

Bacteria in the order Cytophagales can differ in their ecological roles as a response to the various environments in which they can be found. In terrestrial systems, they can be found in neutral or near-neutral pH soils, humus, and animal feces. In aquatic systems they are commonly present in near-shore freshwater bodies, estuaries, aerobic sediments, and dense algal mats. [4]

Members of the Cytophagales are also known to be found in large abundance in the ice and coastal pelagic waters of Antarctica, contributing up to 70% of bacterial biomass. [23] As a result, the order plays a key role in the remineralization of organic materials into micronutrients. This cycling process allows the transfer and use of biologically important nutrients across different trophic levels found within the aquatic system.

Bacteria in the Order Cytophagales possess cellulose-degrading qualities and have been known to often associate with several non-cellulolytic microbes. For example, a synergistic relationship between some members of the Cytophagales, and some strains in the genus Achromobacter , results in enhanced cellulolytic activity in some isolates of the Cytophagales. For example, bacteria in the genus Achromobacter contribute to the relationship through the production of β-glucosidase which can be used by Cytophagales microbes to hydrolyze cellodextrin into glucose and prevent the feedback inhibition that would otherwise occur with the accumulation of cellobiose. [4]

Environment and abundance

Prokaryote biomass in the oceans is clustered in the surface waters and is dominated by autotrophic and heterotrophic bacteria. [4] Among the heterotrophic bacteria, the two most abundant groups are the Proteobacteria and the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria cluster. Heterotrophic bacteria are crucial in the cycling of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the ocean, which affects the global carbon budget.

Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to estimate abundance of Cytophaga-Flavobacteria. [10] The most common oligonucleotide probe for Cytophaga-Flavobacteria is CF319a. However, CF319a does not recognize some Cytophaga-Flavobacteria, so current abundance values are likely to be underestimated.

Cytophaga-Flavobacteria is the most abundant of all bacterial groups in ocean habitats and accounts for about half of bacteria identified by FISH. They are also abundant in freshwater and sediment systems. However, clone library abundance estimates from 16S rRNA genes from free-living bacterial assemblages show different results. Several studies have been done to compare clone libraries and FISH abundance estimates at the same location in the oceans. The results of these studies show that FISH abundance estimates are much higher than clone library estimates - leading some scientists to believe that the Cytophaga-Flavobacteria cluster is under-represented in clone libraries while other bacterial groups are overrepresented.

A study done by Jurgens et al. examined the growth rates of several bacterial groups using FISH. [24] They found that the net growth rate of Cytophaga-Flavobacteria was about double the rate of other bacterial groups examined. This could account for the high abundance of Cytophaga-Flavobacteria in the oceans.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

Cytophagales was first described by Leadbetter in 1974, who is the authority for the order. [25] Its approximate phylogenetic position was determined in 1985 through 16s rRNA studies, but other experiments have shown that Cytophagales' exact taxonomy is still currently hard to pinpoint. [4] The genera Bernardetia, Hugenholtzia , Garritya, and Eisenibacter are on separate branches within the Cytophagales based on methods such as 16S rRNA sequencing and phylogenomic analysis, as well as physiological and morphological data. [26] Other relatives include Thermoflexibacter , which is a genus that 'represents a branch of uncertain affiliation' within the Cytophagales order. [26] Known families belonging to the order Cytophagales include Microscillaceae and Bernardetiaceae, as well as Catalinimonadaceae and Cesiribacteraceae , among many others. Genera in the Cytophagales comprise Cytophaga, Flexibacter, Sporocytophaga, Sphaero-cytophagal, Capnocytophaga, Microscilla, and Lysobacter, as well as others included in the taxonomic list below. [27]

Taxonomic history

The taxonomy of Cytophagales presents a considerable challenge and has been revisited and modified many times over the past 100 years. Most recently the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes: Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Aerobic Bacteroidetes met to discuss taxonomic changes in 2017. [28] Additionally, García-López et al. (2019) published a paper which defined the families in Cytophagales, which have been reflected on LSPN. [6]

Phylogeny

The currently accepted taxonomy is based on the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature [3]

Whole-genome based phylogeny [29] [lower-alpha 1] 16S rRNA based LTP_08_2023 [30] [31] [32] 120 marker proteins based GTDB 08-RS214 [33] [34] [35]

Hymenobacteraceae

Mooreiaceae

Flexibacteraceae

Cytophagaceae

Spirosomaceae

Thermonemataceae

Microscillaceae

Thermoflexibacteraceae

Bernardetiaceae

Flammeovirgaceae

Cesiribacteraceae

Fulvivirgaceae

Reichenbachiellaceae

Roseivirgaceae

Marivirgaceae

Cyclobacteriaceae

Raineyaceae Albuquerque et al. 2018

Microscillaceae Hahnke et al. 2017

Cytophagales

Hymenobacteraceae Munoz et al. 2016

Xanthovirga

Persicobacteraceae Munoz et al. 2016

Eisenibacter

Luteivirga

Flammeovirgaceae Yoon et al. 2011 (incl. Bernardetiaceae)

Mooreiaceae Choi et al. 2013

Thermonemataceae Munoz et al. 2016

Cyclobacteriaceae Nedashkovskaya and Ludwig 2012

"Marinoscillaceae"

Marivirgaceae García-López et al. 2020

Mangrovivirgaceae Sefrji et al. 2021

Catalinimonadaceae Choi et al. 2013

Fulvivirgaceae García-López et al. 2020

Reichenbachiellaceae García-López et al. 2020

Roseivirgaceae García-López et al. 2020

Cesiribacteraceae García-López et al. 2020

Fulvivirgaceae 2

Cytophagaceae Stanier 1940

Flexibacteraceae García-López et al. 2020

Thermoflexibacteraceae García-López et al. 2020

"Rhodocytophagaceae" Pallen, Rodriguez-R & Alikhan 2022 ex Zhang et al. 2023

Spirosomaceae (sic) Larkin and Borrall 1978

Chitinophagales

Sphingobacteriales

Bacteroidales

Flavobacteriales

"Amoebophilaceae" Santos-Garcia et al. 2014

Cyclobacteriaceae (incl. Cesiribacteraceae; Fulvivirgaceae; Mangrovivirgaceae; Marinoscillaceae; Marivirgaceae; Persicobacteraceae; Reichenbachiellaceae; Roseivirgaceae)

Cytophagaceae

Microscillaceae

Thermonemataceae (incl. Mooreiaceae; Raineyaceae)

Thermoflexibacteraceae

Bernardetiaceae Hahnke et al. 2017

Flammeovirgaceae

"Rhodocytophagaceae"

Spirosomataceae

Catalinimonadaceae (incl. Flexibacteraceae)

Hymenobacteraceae

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Catalinimonadaceae, Persicobacteraceae, and Raineyaceae are not included in this phylogenetic tree.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green sulfur bacteria</span> Family of bacteria

The green sulfur bacteria are a phylum, Chlorobiota, of obligately anaerobic photoautotrophic bacteria that metabolize sulfur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bacteroidota</span> Phylum of Gram-negative bacteria

The phylum Bacteroidota is composed of three large classes of Gram-negative, nonsporeforming, anaerobic or aerobic, and rod-shaped bacteria that are widely distributed in the environment, including in soil, sediments, and sea water, as well as in the guts and on the skin of animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acidobacteriota</span> Phylum of bacteria

Acidobacteriota is a phylum of Gram-negative bacteria. Its members are physiologically diverse and ubiquitous, especially in soils, but are under-represented in culture.

Heliobacteria are a unique subset of prokaryotic bacteria that process light for energy. Distinguishable from other phototrophic bacteria, they utilize a unique photosynthetic pigment, bacteriochlorophyll g and are the only known Gram-positive phototroph. They are a key player in symbiotic nitrogen fixation alongside plants, and use a type I reaction center like green-sulfur bacteria.

Photoheterotrophs are heterotrophic phototrophs—that is, they are organisms that use light for energy, but cannot use carbon dioxide as their sole carbon source. Consequently, they use organic compounds from the environment to satisfy their carbon requirements; these compounds include carbohydrates, fatty acids, and alcohols. Examples of photoheterotrophic organisms include purple non-sulfur bacteria, green non-sulfur bacteria, and heliobacteria. These microorganisms are ubiquitous in aquatic habitats, occupy unique niche-spaces, and contribute to global biogeochemical cycling. Recent research has also indicated that the oriental hornet and some aphids may be able to use light to supplement their energy supply.

Fibrobacterota is a small bacterial phylum which includes many of the major rumen bacteria, allowing for the degradation of plant-based cellulose in ruminant animals. Members of this phylum were categorized in other phyla. The genus Fibrobacter was removed from the genus Bacteroides in 1988.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gammaproteobacteria</span> Class of bacteria

Gammaproteobacteria is a class of bacteria in the phylum Pseudomonadota. It contains about 250 genera, which makes it the most genus-rich taxon of the Prokaryotes. Several medically, ecologically, and scientifically important groups of bacteria belong to this class. It is composed by all Gram-negative microbes and is the most phylogenetically and physiologically diverse class of Proteobacteria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flavobacteriia</span> Class of bacteria

The class Flavobacteriia is composed of a single class of environmental bacteria. It contains the family Flavobacteriaceae, which is the largest family in the phylum Bacteroidota. This class is widely distributed in soil, fresh, and seawater habitats. The name is often spelt Flavobacteria, but was officially named Flavobacteriia in 2012.

<i>Roseobacter</i> Genus of bacteria

In taxonomy, Roseobacter is a genus of the Rhodobacteraceae. The Roseobacter clade falls within the {alpha}-3 subclass of the class Alphaproteobacteria. The first strain descriptions appeared in 1991 which described members Roseobacterlitoralis and Roseobacterdenitrificans, both pink-pigmented bacteriochlorophyll a-producing strains isolated from marine algae. The role members of the Roseobacter lineage play in marine biogeochemical cycles and climate change cannot be overestimated. Roseobacters make up 25% of coastal marine bacteria and members of this lineage process a significant portion of the total carbon in the marine environment. Roseobacter clade plays an important role in global carbon and sulphur cycles. It can also degrade aromatic compounds, uptake trace metal, and form symbiotic relationship. In term of its application, Roseobacter clade produces bioactive compounds, has been used widely in aquaculture and quorum sensing.

Fibrobacter succinogenes is a cellulolytic bacterium species in the genus Fibrobacter. It is present in the rumen of cattle. F. succinogenes is a gram negative, rod-shaped, obligate anaerobe that is a major contributor to cellulose digestion. Since its discovery in the 1950s, it has been studied for its role in herbivore digestion and cellulose fermentation, which can be utilized in biofuel production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bacterioplankton</span> Bacterial component of the plankton that drifts in the water column

Bacterioplankton refers to the bacterial component of the plankton that drifts in the water column. The name comes from the Ancient Greek word πλανκτος, meaning "wanderer" or "drifter", and bacterium, a Latin term coined in the 19th century by Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg. They are found in both seawater and freshwater.

<i>Cytophaga</i> Genus of bacteria

Cytophaga is a genus of Gram-negative, gliding, rod-shaped bacteria. This bacterium is commonly found in soil, rapidly digests crystalline cellulose C. hutchinsonii is able to use its gliding motility to move quickly over surfaces. Although the mechanism for this is not known, there is a belief that the flagellum is not used

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bacterial phyla</span> Phyla or divisions of the domain Bacteria

Bacterial phyla constitute the major lineages of the domain Bacteria. While the exact definition of a bacterial phylum is debated, a popular definition is that a bacterial phylum is a monophyletic lineage of bacteria whose 16S rRNA genes share a pairwise sequence identity of ~75% or less with those of the members of other bacterial phyla.

Dokdonia donghaensis is a strictly aerobic, gram-negative, phototrophic bacterium that thrives in marine environments. The organism can grow at a broad range of temperatures on seawater media. It has the ability to form biofilms, which increases the organism's resistance to antimicrobial agents, such as tetracycline.

Polaribacter is a genus in the family Flavobacteriaceae. They are gram-negative, aerobic bacteria that can be heterotrophic, psychrophilic or mesophilic. Most species are non-motile and species range from ovoid to rod-shaped. Polaribacter forms yellow- to orange-pigmented colonies. They have been mostly adapted to cool marine ecosystems, and their optimal growth range is at a temperature between 10 and 32 °C and at a pH of 7.0 to 8.0. They are oxidase and catalase-positive and are able to grow using carbohydrates, amino acids, and organic acids.

Dokdonia is a genus of bacteria in the family Flavobacteriaceae and phylum Bacteroidota.

Endozoicomonas is a genus of Gram-negative, aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, chemoorganotrophic, rod-shaped, marine bacteria from the family of Endozoicomonadaceae. Endozoicomonas are symbionts of marine animals.

Cytophaga hutchinsonii is a bacterial species in the genus Cytophaga. C. hutchinsonii is an aerobic, gram-negative, soil, microorganism that exhibits gliding motility, enabling it to move quickly over surfaces and is capable of cellulose degradation.

Breznakibacter xylanolyticus is a freshwater gliding bacterium that degrades insoluble particulate xylans and dominates xylan fermentation, particularly in sulfur and methane-rich environments. It is the only species in the genus Breznakibacter. At the time of isolation it was classified in the order Cytophagales on the basis of phenotypic characteristics such as polymer degradation and gliding motility. It has since been reclassified to the order Bacteroidales due to 16s rRNA genome sequence analysis.

Balneolales is an order of bacteria.

References

  1. ↑ Nakagawa Y (2010). "Class IV. Cytophagia class. nov.". In Krieg NR, Staley JT, Brown DR, Hedlund BP, Paster BJ, Ward NL, Ludwig W, Whitman WB (eds.). Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Vol. 4 (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. p. 370.
  2. ↑ Leadbetter ER (1974). "Family I. Cytophagaceae Stanier 1940, 630, emend. mut. char.". In Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (ed.). Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (8th ed.). Baltimore, MD: The Williams and Wilkins Co. pp. 99–127.
  3. 1 2 Euzéby JP, Parte AC. "Cytophagia". List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN). Retrieved June 24, 2021.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Reichenbach, Hans (2006), Dworkin, Martin; Falkow, Stanley; Rosenberg, Eugene; Schleifer, Karl-Heinz (eds.), "The Order Cytophagales", The Prokaryotes: Volume 7: Proteobacteria: Delta, Epsilon Subclass, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 549–590, doi:10.1007/0-387-30747-8_20, ISBN   978-0-387-30747-3 , retrieved 2021-04-01
  5. 1 2 "Studies of genera cytophaga-flavobacterium in context of the soil carbon cycle | MSU Libraries". d.lib.msu.edu. Retrieved 2021-04-01.
  6. 1 2 García-López, Marina; Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P.; Tindall, Brian J.; Gronow, Sabine; Woyke, Tanja; Kyrpides, Nikos C.; Hahnke, Richard L.; Göker, Markus (2019). "Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes". Frontiers in Microbiology. 10: 2083. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02083 . ISSN   1664-302X. PMC   6767994 . PMID   31608019.
  7. ↑ "Genus: Cytophaga". lpsn.dsmz.de. Retrieved 2021-04-03.
  8. ↑ "Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, κύτος". www.perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved 2021-04-06.
  9. ↑ "Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, φα^γεῖν". www.perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved 2021-04-06.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Kirchman, David L. (2002-02-01). "The ecology of Cytophaga–Flavobacteria in aquatic environments". FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 39 (2): 91–100. Bibcode:2002FEMME..39...91K. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2002.tb00910.x . ISSN   0168-6496. PMID   19709188.
  11. ↑ Christensen, Penelope J. (1977-12-01). "The history, biology, and taxonomy of the Cytophaga group". Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 23 (12): 1599–1653. doi:10.1139/m77-236. ISSN   0008-4166. PMID   413616.
  12. ↑ Cottrell, Matthew T.; Kirchman, David L. (2000-04-01). "Natural Assemblages of Marine Proteobacteria and Members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacter Cluster Consuming Low- and High-Molecular-Weight Dissolved Organic Matter". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 66 (4): 1692–1697. Bibcode:2000ApEnM..66.1692C. doi:10.1128/AEM.66.4.1692-1697.2000. ISSN   0099-2240. PMC   92043 . PMID   10742262.
  13. ↑ Sømme, O. M. (1958-11-01). "Reviews". ICES Journal of Marine Science. 24 (1): 158–160. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/24.1.158 . ISSN   1054-3139.
  14. ↑ "Home - Cytophaga hutchinsonii ATCC 33406". genome.jgi.doe.gov. Retrieved 2021-04-02.
  15. ↑ Xie, Gary; Bruce, David C.; Challacombe, Jean F.; Chertkov, Olga; Detter, John C.; Gilna, Paul; Han, Cliff S.; Lucas, Susan; Misra, Monica; Myers, Gerald L.; Richardson, Paul (2007-06-01). "Genome Sequence of the Cellulolytic Gliding Bacterium Cytophaga hutchinsonii". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 73 (11): 3536–3546. Bibcode:2007ApEnM..73.3536X. doi:10.1128/AEM.00225-07. ISSN   0099-2240. PMC   1932680 . PMID   17400776.
  16. ↑ Bai, Xinfeng; Wang, Xifeng; Wang, Sen; Ji, Xiaofei; Guan, Zhiwei; Zhang, Weican; Lu, Xuemei (2017). "Functional Studies of β-Glucosidases of Cytophaga hutchinsonii and Their Effects on Cellulose Degradation". Frontiers in Microbiology. 8: 140. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00140 . ISSN   1664-302X. PMC   5288383 . PMID   28210251.
  17. 1 2 Choi, Eun Ju; Beatty, Deanna S.; Paul, Lauren A.; Fenical, William; Jensen, Paul R. (April 2013). "Mooreia alkaloidigena gen. nov., sp. nov. and Catalinimonas alkaloidigena gen. nov., sp. nov., alkaloid-producing marine bacteria in the proposed families Mooreiaceae fam. nov. and Catalimonadaceae fam. nov. in the phylum Bacteroidetes". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 63 (Pt 4): 1219–1228. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.043752-0. ISSN   1466-5034. PMC   3709535 . PMID   22753528.
  18. ↑ Murphy, Brian T.; Jensen, Paul R.; Fenical, William (2012), Fattorusso, Ernesto; Gerwick, William H.; Taglialatela-Scafati, Orazio (eds.), "The Chemistry of Marine Bacteria", Handbook of Marine Natural Products, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 153–190, doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3834-0_3, ISBN   978-90-481-3834-0 , retrieved 2021-04-02
  19. ↑ Park, Yuna; Maeng, Soohyun; Han, Joo Hyun; Lee, Sang Eun; Zhang, Jing; Kim, Min-Kyu; Cha, In-Tae; Lee, Ki-eun; Lee, Byoung-Hee; Kim, Myung Kyum (2020-12-01). "Rhodocytophaga rosea sp. nov. and Nibribacter ruber sp. nov., two radiation-resistant bacteria isolated from soil". Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 113 (12): 2177–2185. doi:10.1007/s10482-020-01488-1. ISSN   1572-9699. PMID   33135105. S2CID   226232317.
  20. 1 2 Achenbach, Hans (1987), "The Pigments of the Flexirubin-Type. A Novel Class of Natural Products", Fortschritte der Chemie organischer Naturstoffe / Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products, vol. 52, Vienna: Springer Vienna, pp. 73–111, doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-8906-1_2, ISBN   978-3-7091-8908-5 , retrieved 2021-04-03
  21. 1 2 3 Venil, Chidambaram Kulandaisamy; Zakaria, Zainul Akmar; Usha, Rajamanickam; Ahmad, Wan Azlina (2014-10-01). "Isolation and characterization of flexirubin type pigment from Chryseobacterium sp. UTM-3T". Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 3 (4): 103–107. doi:10.1016/j.bcab.2014.02.006. ISSN   1878-8181.
  22. ↑ Bai, Xinfeng; Zhu, Shibo; Wang, Xifeng; Zhang, Weican; Liu, Changheng; Lu, Xuemei (2017-11-01). "Identification of a fabZ gene essential for flexirubin synthesis in Cytophaga hutchinsonii". FEMS Microbiology Letters. 364 (fnx197). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx197 . ISSN   0378-1097. PMID   28961729.
  23. ↑ Bowman, J P (2000). "Description of Cellulophaga algicola sp. nov., isolated from the surfaces of Antarctic algae, and reclassification of Cytophaga uliginosa (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Reichenbach 1989 as Cellulophaga uliginosa comb. nov". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 50 (5): 1861–1868. doi: 10.1099/00207713-50-5-1861 . ISSN   1466-5026. PMID   11034497.
  24. ↑ Jürgens, Klaus; Pernthaler, Jakob; Schalla, Sven; Amann, Rudolf (1999-03-01). "Morphological and Compositional Changes in a Planktonic Bacterial Community in Response to Enhanced Protozoan Grazing". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 65 (3): 1241–1250. Bibcode:1999ApEnM..65.1241J. doi:10.1128/AEM.65.3.1241-1250.1999. ISSN   1098-5336. PMC   91171 . PMID   10049890.
  25. ↑ "WoRMS - World Register of Marine Species - Cytophagales". www.marinespecies.org. Retrieved 2021-04-07.
  26. 1 2 Hahnke, Richard L.; Meier-Kolthoff, Jan P.; García-López, Marina; Mukherjee, Supratim; Huntemann, Marcel; Ivanova, Natalia N.; Woyke, Tanja; Kyrpides, Nikos C.; Klenk, Hans-Peter; Göker, Markus (2016-12-20). "Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes". Frontiers in Microbiology. 7: 2003. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02003 . ISSN   1664-302X. PMC   5167729 . PMID   28066339.
  27. ↑ Reichenbach, Hans; Dworkin, Martin (1981), Starr, Mortimer P.; Stolp, Heinz; Trüper, Hans G.; Balows, Albert (eds.), "The Order Cytophagales (with Addenda on the Genera Herpetosiphon, Saprospira, and Flexithrix)", The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on Habitats, Isolation, and Identification of Bacteria, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 356–379, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-13187-9_21, ISBN   978-3-662-13187-9 , retrieved 2021-04-07
  28. ↑ Bowman, John P.; Bernardet, Jean-Francois; Lau, Ellen Frandsen (2020-11-01). "International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes: Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Aerobic Bacteroidetes (formerly Flavobacterium and Cytophaga-like bacteria)". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 70 (11): 6017–6020. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004243 . ISSN   1466-5026. PMID   32985968.
  29. ↑ García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Hahnke RL, Göker M (2019). "Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes". Front Microbiol. 10: 2083. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02083 . PMC   6767994 . PMID   31608019.
  30. ↑ "The LTP" . Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  31. ↑ "LTP_all tree in newick format" . Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  32. ↑ "LTP_08_2023 Release Notes" (PDF). Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  33. ↑ "GTDB release 08-RS214". Genome Taxonomy Database . Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  34. ↑ "bac120_r214.sp_label". Genome Taxonomy Database . Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  35. ↑ "Taxon History". Genome Taxonomy Database . Retrieved 10 May 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.