Electronic flight bag

Last updated
Electronic flight bag showing the airport diagram of Avalon Airport N150GA Gulfstream Aerospace G150 (6485933503).jpg
Electronic flight bag showing the airport diagram of Avalon Airport

An electronic flight bag (EFB) is an electronic information management device that helps flight crews perform flight management tasks more easily and efficiently with less paper [1] providing the reference material often found in the pilot's carry-on flight bag, including the flight-crew operating manual, navigational charts, etc. [2] In addition, the EFB can host purpose-built software applications to automate other functions normally conducted by hand, such as take-off performance calculations. [3] The EFB gets its name from the traditional pilot's flight bag, which is typically a heavy (up to or over 18 kg or 40 lb) documents bag that pilots carry to the cockpit. [4]

Contents

An EFB is intended primarily for cockpit/flightdeck or cabin use. [5] For large and turbine aircraft, FAR 91.503 requires the presence of navigational charts on the airplane. [6] If an operator's sole source of navigational chart information is contained on an EFB, the operator must demonstrate the EFB will continue to operate throughout a decompression event, and thereafter, regardless of altitude.

History

The earliest EFB precursors came from individual pilots from FedEx in the early 1990s who used their personal laptops, referred to as Airport Performance Laptop Computers, to carry out aircraft performance calculations on the aircraft (this was a commercial off-the-shelf computer and was considered portable). [7]

The first true EFB, designed specifically to replace a pilot's entire kit bag, was patented by Angela Masson as the Electronic Kit Bag (EKB) in 1999. [8] In October 2003 KLM Airlines accepted the first installed EFB on a Boeing 777 aircraft. The Boeing EFB hardware was made by Astronautics Corporation of America and software applications were supplied by both Jeppesen and Boeing. [9] In 2005, the first commercial Class 2 EFB was issued to Avionics Support Group, Inc. with its Constant Friction Mount (cfMount) as part of the EFB. [10] The installation was performed on a Miami Air Boeing B737NG. [10]

In 2009, Continental Airlines successfully completed the world’s first flight using Jeppesen Airport Surface Area Moving Map (AMM) showing “own ship” position on a Class 2 Electronic Flight Bag platform. [11] The AMM application uses a high resolution database to dynamically render maps of the airport. [11]

As personal computing technology became more compact and powerful, EFBs became capable of storing all the aeronautical charts for the entire world on a single three-pound (1.4 kg) computer, compared to the 80 lb (36 kg) of paper normally required for worldwide paper charts.[ citation needed ] Using EFBs increases safety and enhances the crews’ access to operating procedures and flight management information, enhance safety by allowing aircrews to calculate aircraft performance for safer departures and arrivals as well as aircraft weight and balance for loading-planning purposes accurately. [12]

The Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) purchased an initial supply of over 3,000 iPad-based EFBs which were launched in December 2011. [13] In a similar acquisition, Air Mobility Command initiated a contract for up to 18,000 iPad-based EFBs. [14] The Air Force Special Operations Command internally developed a secure method of transferring the National Geo-Spatial Intelligence Agency's (NGA) monthly Flight Information Publications (FLIP) dataset to all its users worldwide.

After trialing cockpit iPads as EFBs in 2011, Delta Air Lines announced in August 2013 it would replace a policy allowing pilots to use personal tablets as EFBs. [15] [16] Delta planned to provide new certified EFBs to all of its pilots by May 2014, [17] after FAA approval in February. [18] [19] [20] Early risk of breakage to iPads used as EFBs was addressed through rugged case design. [21]

However, the purchase of iPad from AFSOC was cancelled in February 2012 due to security concerns, where Russian-made software procurement issues may cause potential risks to expose end users. [22]

Design features

EFBs were initially divided into a number of hardware classes and software types. [23] However, later EFBs simply were categorized as "Portable" (PEDs) or "Installed". [24] Portable can be considered to consolidate the previous Class 1 and 2 distinctions, while Installed is equivalent to Class 3. These simplifications made to reduce confusion and to harmonize with already-released EASA and ICAO guidance.

Legacy EFB hardware classes were:

EFB may host a wide array of applications, initially categorized in three software categories. [2]

Initially Type C applications were considered as subject to airworthiness requirements and as such must be developed in conformance with DO-178/ED-12 objectives and run on Class 3 EFB. Later, with release of AC 120-76D in 2017, reference to Type C applications were removed, and their functionality no longer an EFB functions. [25]

Regulations

United States Federal Aviation Administration

While FAR Part 91 Operators [26] (those not flying for hire, including private and corporate operators) can use their pilot-in-command authority to approve the use of EFBs which are PEDs, operator with OpSpecs (Part 135, Part 121) must seek operational approval through the OpSpecs process [27] based on the following requirements:

European Aviation Safety Agency

For guidance on airworthiness and operational considerations for Electronic Flight Bags (EFB) for operators within Europe, EASA AMC 20-25 applies.

United Kingdom Military Aviation Authority

The UK Ministry of Defence takes the approach of clearing the airworthiness of EFB on specific aircraft types as 'Equipment Not Basic to Air System (ENBAS)' as described in Regulatory Article 1340. The Type Airworthiness Authority (TAA) and supporting Delivery Teams are responsible for this clearance to ensure that the EFB device in and of itself does not negatively impact the airworthiness of the aircraft in question. Regarding the approval of use of specific applications, this is the responsibility of the Aviation Duty Holder (ADH) chain.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avionics</span> Electronic systems used on aircraft

Avionics are the electronic systems used on aircraft. Avionic systems include communications, navigation, the display and management of multiple systems, and the hundreds of systems that are fitted to aircraft to perform individual functions. These can be as simple as a searchlight for a police helicopter or as complicated as the tactical system for an airborne early warning platform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Aviation Administration</span> U.S. government agency regulating civil aviation

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is a U.S. federal government agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation which regulates civil aviation in the United States and surrounding international waters. Its powers include air traffic control, certification of personnel and aircraft, setting standards for airports, and protection of U.S. assets during the launch or re-entry of commercial space vehicles. Powers over neighboring international waters were delegated to the FAA by authority of the International Civil Aviation Organization.

The Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) are rules prescribed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) governing all aviation activities in the United States. The FARs comprise Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. A wide variety of activities are regulated, such as aircraft design and maintenance, typical airline flights, pilot training activities, hot-air ballooning, lighter-than-air aircraft, human-made structure heights, obstruction lighting and marking, model rocket launches, commercial space operations, model aircraft operations, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and kite flying. The rules are designed to promote safe aviation, protecting pilots, flight attendants, passengers and the general public from unnecessary risk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flight simulator</span> Technology used for training aircrew

A flight simulator is a device that artificially re-creates aircraft flight and the environment in which it flies, for pilot training, design, or other purposes. It includes replicating the equations that govern how aircraft fly, how they react to applications of flight controls, the effects of other aircraft systems, and how the aircraft reacts to external factors such as air density, turbulence, wind shear, cloud, precipitation, etc. Flight simulation is used for a variety of reasons, including flight training, the design and development of the aircraft itself, and research into aircraft characteristics and control handling qualities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stick shaker</span> Mechanical device in an aircraft cockpit to warn the pilot of an imminent stall

A stick shaker is a mechanical device designed to rapidly and noisily vibrate the control yoke of an aircraft, warning the flight crew that an imminent aerodynamic stall has been detected. It is typically present on the majority of large civil jet aircraft, as well as most large military planes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glass cockpit</span> Aircraft instrumentation system consisting primarily of multi-function electronic displays

A glass cockpit is an aircraft cockpit that features an array of electronic (digital) flight instrument displays, typically large LCD screens, rather than traditional analog dials and gauges. While a traditional cockpit relies on numerous mechanical gauges to display information, a glass cockpit uses several multi-function displays and a primary flight display driven by flight management systems, that can be adjusted to show flight information as needed. This simplifies aircraft operation and navigation and allows pilots to focus only on the most pertinent information. They are also popular with airline companies as they usually eliminate the need for a flight engineer, saving costs. In recent years the technology has also become widely available in small aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sikorsky S-76</span> American medium-size commercial utility helicopter

The Sikorsky S-76 is a medium-size commercial utility helicopter designed and produced by the American helicopter manufacturer Sikorsky Aircraft. It is the company's first helicopter specifically developed for the civilian market.

Aeronautical Radio, Incorporated (ARINC), established in 1929, was a major provider of transport communications and systems engineering solutions for eight industries: aviation, airports, defense, government, healthcare, networks, security, and transportation. ARINC had installed computer data networks in police cars and railroad cars and also maintains the standards for line-replaceable units.

In the U.S., Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations prohibit the use of mobile phones aboard aircraft in flight. Contrary to popular misconception, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) does not actually prohibit the use of personal electronic devices on aircraft. Paragraph (b)(5) of 14 CFR 91.21 permits airlines to determine if devices can be used in flight, allowing use of "any other portable electronic device that the operator of the aircraft has determined will not cause interference with the navigation or communication system of the aircraft on which it is to be used."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Type certificate</span> Document noting the airworthiness of a certain type of aircraft

A type certificate signifies the airworthiness of a particular category of aircraft, according to its manufacturing design. Certification confirms that the aircraft of a new type intended for serial production is in compliance with applicable airworthiness requirements established by the national air law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Light-sport aircraft</span> Category of lightweight aircraft that are simple to fly

A light-sport aircraft (LSA), or light sport aircraft, is a fairly new category of small, lightweight aircraft that are simple to fly. LSAs tend to be heavier and more sophisticated than ultralight aircraft, but LSA restrictions on weight and performance separates the category from established GA aircraft. There is no standard worldwide description of an LSA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ultralight aircraft (United States)</span> American aircraft category


Ultralight aircraft exist outside of the United States. In most countries, ultralights are a class of aircraft. A completely different legal concept is valid within the USA. The FAA makes explicitly clear, that ultralight vehicles are no aircraft, are not regulated as aircraft, and are exempt from aircraft rules. Instead, they are treated as powersport items and have to follow their own ruleset, FAR-103, which is the most compact aviation regulation in existence. It can be printed on the front- and backside of a single piece of paper.

An Air Data Inertial Reference Unit (ADIRU) is a key component of the integrated Air Data Inertial Reference System (ADIRS), which supplies air data and inertial reference information to the pilots' electronic flight instrument system displays as well as other systems on the aircraft such as the engines, autopilot, aircraft flight control system and landing gear systems. An ADIRU acts as a single, fault tolerant source of navigational data for both pilots of an aircraft. It may be complemented by a secondary attitude air data reference unit (SAARU), as in the Boeing 777 design.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terrain awareness and warning system</span> Technological equipment to prevent pilots from flying into obstacles

In aviation, a terrain awareness and warning system (TAWS) is generally an on-board system aimed at preventing unintentional impacts with the ground, termed "controlled flight into terrain" accidents, or CFIT. The specific systems currently in use are the ground proximity warning system (GPWS) and the enhanced ground proximity warning system (EGPWS). The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) introduced the generic term TAWS to encompass all terrain-avoidance systems that meet the relevant FAA standards, which include GPWS, EGPWS and any future system that might replace them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terrafugia Transition</span> American roadable aircraft

The Terrafugia Transition is a light sport, roadable airplane under development by Terrafugia since 2006.

Cockpit iPads are iPads used in the aviation industry as part of an electronic flight bag to replace paper charts and manuals. This technology is currently being used by both private and commercial aircraft pilots.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flight bag</span> Document bag carried by pilots and flight crews

A flight bag can refer to any baggage taken on board a flight, but usually refers to a specific type of document bag carried by pilots and flight crews. Often adorned with an airline logo, at one time the flight bag was a chic fashion accessory.

An integrated standby instrument system (ISIS) is an electronic aircraft instrument. It is intended to serve as backup in case of a failure of the standard glass cockpit instrumentation, allowing pilots to continue to receive key flight-related information. Prior to the use of ISIS, this was performed by individual redundant mechanical instrumentation instead. Such systems have become common to be installed in various types of aircraft, ranging from airliners to helicopters and smaller general aviation aircraft. While it is common for new-built aircraft to be outfitted with ISIS, numerous operators have opted to have their fleets retrofitted with such apparatus as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing 737 MAX groundings</span> 2019–20 worldwide grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX

The Boeing 737 MAX passenger airliner was grounded worldwide between March 2019 and December 2020 – longer in many jurisdictions – after 346 people died in two similar crashes in less than five months: Lion Air Flight 610 on October 29, 2018, and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 on March 10, 2019. The Federal Aviation Administration initially affirmed the MAX's continued airworthiness, claiming to have insufficient evidence of accident similarities. By March 13, the FAA followed behind 51 concerned regulators in deciding to ground the aircraft. All 387 aircraft delivered to airlines were grounded by March 18.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing 737 MAX certification</span> Certification of aircraft

The Boeing 737 MAX was initially certified in 2017 by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). Global regulators grounded the plane in 2019 following fatal crashes of Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302. Both crashes were linked to the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), a new automatic flight control feature. Investigations into both crashes determined that Boeing and the FAA favored cost-saving solutions, which ultimately produced a flawed design of the MCAS instead. The FAA's Organization Designation Authorization program, allowing manufacturers to act on its behalf, was also questioned for weakening its oversight of Boeing.

References

  1. "Electronic flight bag". Australian Government Civil Aviation Authority. 23 June 2019. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ,"Integrated communication and application system for aircraft",issued 2014-02-27
  3. Matt Thurber - (January 25, 2019). "Amazing Apps". AIN online.
  4. "An Introduction to Electronic Flight Bags EFBs". RocketRoute. 2013-09-06. Retrieved 2020-10-27.
  5. Federal Aviation Administration. "Guidelines for the Certification, Airworthiness and Operational Use of Electronic Flight Bags" (PDF). US Department of Transportation.
  6. Pilots Guide to Avionics 2012-2013. Aircraft Electronics Association. 2012.
  7. Suppiah, Saravanan; Liu, Dahai; Lee, Sang-A; Dattel, Andrew; Vincenzi Ph.D., Dennis. "Impact of Electronic Flight bag (EFB) on Single Pilot Performance and Workload". Archived from the original on 2021-01-18.
  8. USPTO Patents # 17,974,775 Archived 2017-01-18 at the Wayback Machine Masson; Angela Electronic kit bag; and, # 27,970,531 Archived 2017-12-01 at the Wayback Machine Masson; Angela Electronic kit bag
  9. "First Boeing 777 for KLM in Final Assembly". MediaRoom. Retrieved 2023-06-06.
  10. 1 2 Careless, James. "Mounting Options for Modern EFBs By James Careless". Aerospace Tech Review. Archived from the original on 2021-04-11.
  11. 1 2 "Jeppesen Airport Moving Map to Improve Runway Safety by Reducing Incursion Risk". AviationPros. 25 March 2008.
  12. Moorman, Robert. "EFBs: More Than Paper Replacers". Avionics International. Archived from the original on 2018-12-22.
  13. Brewin, Bob (10 January 2012). "Air Force Special Operations Command revises iPad purchase plans". Nextgov.
  14. Robertson, Adi (2 March 2012). "US Air Force places order for up to 18,000 iPads". The Verge. Archived from the original on 2012-03-04.
  15. Cole, Shane (27 September 2013). "Delta Airlines to distribute Surface 2 to pilots after iPad trial". appleinsider.com. Retrieved 30 September 2013.
  16. Gandhe, Shreyas (27 September 2013). "Delta Airlines to equip pilots with Surface 2 tablets". Neowin . Neowin. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  17. Bort, Julie (10 January 2014). "Here's The Microsoft Surface 2 Tablet Delta Bought 11,000 Pilots Instead Of IPads". Business Insider Australia. Allure Media. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  18. Reising, Don (11 February 2014). "Microsoft's Surface 2 cleared for takeoff in cockpit". CNet . CBS Interactive. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  19. Dent, Steve (11 February 2014). "FAA clears Surface for takeoff in US cockpits". Engadget . AOL Tech. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  20. Walker, James (11 February 2014). "Microsoft Surface 2 approved by FAA for use in airline cockpits". Neowin . Neowin. Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  21. Zimmerman, John (2015-03-23). "The perfect iPad case and mount for pilots?". iPad Pilot News. Retrieved 2019-02-08.
  22. Brewin, Bob (21 February 2012). "Air Force Special Operations cancels iPad buy". Nextgov. Archived from the original on 2018-05-21.
  23. Schwartzentruber, Jeff (2017). "A Usability Study for Electronic Flight Bag (EFB) Flight Planning Applications on Tablet Devices for Ab-initio Pilots". International Journal of Aviation, Aeronautics, and Aerospace. doi: 10.15394/ijaa.2017.1162 . ISSN   2374-6793.
  24. "What are the classifications of EFB?". bytron. Archived from the original on 2021-01-26.
  25. FAA (27 October 2017). "AC 120-76D Authorization for Use of Electronic Flight Bags" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-04-10.
  26. Authority, Civil Aviation Safety (2021-03-27). "Rules and regulations for using EFBs". Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Retrieved 2022-03-22.
  27. FAA: EFB operational authorization and airworthiness/certification requirements
  28. "Guidelines for the Certification, Airworthiness, and Operational Use of Electronic Flight Bags", 6 January 2012, p.12., FAA: EFB operational authorization and airworthiness/certification requirements, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration,. Retrieved 6 November 2020.
  29. Dubet (2003). "Aeronautical charts for electronic flight bags". 22nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference Proceedings (Cat No 03CH37449) DASC-03. IEEE. pp. 13.D.1–13.1. doi:10.1109/dasc.2003.1245955. ISBN   0-7803-7844-X. S2CID   108649188.

Further reading