Eolipotes

Last updated

Eolipotes
Temporal range: Late Miocene 11.29–11.25  Ma
O
S
D
C
P
T
J
K
Pg
N
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Artiodactyla
Infraorder: Cetacea
Family: Lipotidae
Genus: Eolipotes
Kimura & Hasegawa, 2024
Species:
E. japonicus
Binomial name
Eolipotes japonicus
Kimura & Hasegawa, 2024

Eolipotes is an extinct genus of marine river dolphin of the family Lipotidae. It is the oldest known member of the family, having lived in what is now Japan during the Tortonian stage of the Late Miocene. Fossils of this animal are known from the Tochigi prefecture (Ogane or Tanokura Formation) and the Gunma prefecture (Haraichi Formation). Eolipotes was a small cetacean, with the skull indicating a length of around 2.17 m (7 ft 1 in). In spite of its name, Eolipoteshas been found to be more closely related to the genus Parapontoporia , which could indicate that some species of Paraprotoporia and the baiji became freshwater animals independently from one another. However it is also possible that they all evolved from ancestors that already inhabited estuaries, with Eolipotes simply becoming more marine. The genus only includes a single species: E. japonicus.

Contents

History and naming

Eolipotes was described in 2024 on the basis of two fossil specimens discovered in the Kanto region of Japan, specifically the prefectures of Gunma and Tochigi. The holotype specimen was discovered in 2012 by Yukinori Hamada and subsequently excavated by the combined efforts of the Kaijo Junior & Senior High School's geology club and the Tochigi Prefectural Museum. The material, which consists of a skull and other assorted fossil material, clearly belonged to at least two individuals given the presence of three tympanic bullae recovered from the site. The second specimen, designated the paratype and consisting of a partial skull, was collected by Hajime Nakajima from outcrops near the Usui River in the Gunma Prefecture, south-west of where the holotype originated. The holotype was found in the Kinugawa River, with the geology of the locality indicating that it stems from either the upper parts of the Ogane Formation or the lower units of the Tanokura Formation, both of which indicate that the material is Tortonian in age. The paratype also dates to the Tortonian, with the specific sediments providing more a more precise age estimate, narrowing the age down to 11.29 – 11.25 million years. However, the paratype stems from the Haraichi Formation, which is part of the Annaka Group. [1]

The name Eolipotes is a simple combination between the Latin word "eo" meaning early and Lipotes, the genus name of the Holocene Baiji or Yangtze river dolphin, drawing attention to the fact that Eolipotes is the oldest precisely dated member of the family Lipotidae. The species name references the fossils country of origin, Japan. [1]

Description

The skull of Eolipotes has been noted for its small size, with the holotype specimen only meassuring around 14.4 cm (5.7 in) across the widest point of the skull. The rostrum is not fully preserved in either specimen, making it impossible to say how long the snout would have been, but it does show that it was proportionally narrow, widening the closer it gets to the facial region. The rostrum displays a noticeable construction at its base, corresponding to the endpoint of the alveolar groove, before the skull widens abruptly around the maxillary eminence. [1]

The premaxillae dorch over the dorsal-most surface of the rostrum, initially convex but gradually transitioning to having a concave surface towards the back as they contribute to the central basin, a shallow depression in the skull. The extent of the basin is similar to what is seen in other lipotids, with the depth being most similar to that of Parapontoporia wilsoni . A unique feature of the skull of Eolipotes that differentiates it from other lipotids is that the nasals actually come into context with the nasal bones, which could be a basal trait lost in the other genera of the family. The maxillae form the majority of the rostrum and house the alveolar groove, though the individual dental alveoli are poorly known due to what might be preservation. A deep medial sulcus stretches across the ventral surface of the rostrum, giving the crosssection the shape of an upside-down U. Such a sulcus is especially well developed in longirostrine cetaeans like the related Parapontoporia and eurhinodelphids and may serve to strengthen the rostrum. Around the base of the rostrum, the maxilla forms an elliptical structure interpreted to represent the maxillary eminence, at which point the bones widen significantly as they transition to the facial region. Just behind and next to the eminence there is a small ridge, thought to be the maxillary crest which is better developed and Parapontoporia and Lipotes. The left maxilla features two dorsal infraorbital foramina, the more anterior of which is similar in its location to that in modern baijis. The posterior limits of the maxillae on the underside of the skull might preserve the contact between maxillae and palatines, which in turn informs the limit of the pterygoid sinus fossa. Judging from this, the fossa may have ended at or behind the antorbital notch, making it shorter than that of other lipotids. Towards the back of the skull the maxillae approach each other again and come into contact with the raised frontal bones that forms part of the cranial vertex. [1]

The nasal bones are the second element that contributes to the cranial vertex and are wide towards the front and narrow towards the back, with the fronals extending between the two nasals. The contact between nasals and frontals is difficult to observe on account of these bones having almost fused into a singular element. When viewed from above, the vertex as formed by nasals and frontals is roughly triangular in shape, with the point facing towards the back. The frontal part of the vertex is pinched. While this is similar to what is seen in other lipotids, the same can be seen in some members of Inioidea and certain "kentriodontids". [1]

The periotic bone, specifically the anterior bullar facet, is distinct in lipotids and serves to differentiate them from other dolphin groups. The anterodorsal part of the anterior process is especially noteworthy in Eolipotes, as it clearly sets it apart from Lipotes and Paraprotoporia. Whereas in Lipotes this region is rounded and in Paraprotoporia its notably less developed, the anterodorsal aspect of the anterior process is distinctly angled, which gives this element a rectangular appearance in profile view. The process further lacks the prominent ridges that are seen in the periotic of the baiji. [1]

50 teeth have been found around the holotype skull of Eolipotes, yet have not been assigned to the holotype. Regardless, these teeth are small and slender, with the tips curving back. [1]

Size

Since the bizygomatic width of the skull is not known, Kimura and Hasegawa calculated the body length of Eolipotes based on the width across the postorbitals, reasoning that the values are generally similar in delphinids. Their results indicate that Eolipotes may have grown to a length of 2.17 m (7 ft 1 in). [1]

Phylogeny

The type description conducted a phylogenetic analysis based on the supermatrix established by the authors in 2019, itself based on prior supermatrices by Lambert et al. (2017) and Peredo et al. (2018). The two specimens were combined into a single operational taxonomic unit representative of the species for the analysis rather than being scored individually. Finally the analysis was conducted both with equally weighting and implied weighting, tho the trees of both results are much the same and conform with prior results. [1]

The results differ primarily in the relationship between Lipotids and other dolphin groups, with equal weighting placing them as the sister group to Inioidea (South American river dolphins) and Delphinoidea (dolphins and porpoises) while implied weighting suggests them to form a monophyletic clade with inioids as well as some select "kentriodontids". Regardless of the relation between lipotids and other dolphins as a whole, both methods agree in the fact that Lipotidae is restricted to Lipotes, Eolipotes and Parapontoporia, with the latter two emerging as each other's closest relatives. [1]

Delphinida

Evolutionary significance

Though once thought to represent a single group, modern research has shown that the four Holocene river dolphin groups; Lipotidae, Iniidae, Platanistidae and Pontoporiidae; all represent independent instances of once marine forms invading freshwater habitats. [1]

All three known lipotids show a different degree of affinity for freshwater, serving to show how members of a group could adapt to such vastly different environments. Eolipotes appears to have been the most marine taxon, whereas the baiji is only known from freshwater. Parapontoporia represents a mix of the two. While it was originally thought to be exclusively marine, more recent excavations have recovered Parapontoporia fossils from non-marine environments, leading to the idea that at least some may have been facultative or obligate freshwater animals. The significance of this becomes clear when considering the phylogeny, linking Eolipotes with Parapontoporia. Assuming that their ancestors were marine, this would mean that Eolipotes maintained their ancestral lifestyle whereas Lipotes and Parapontoporia represent two independent freshwater invasions within the same family. However Kimura and Hasegawa highlight how this interpretation is not set in stone, as it is also possible that ancestral lipotids could have already been inhabitants of river deltas as is seen in some modern dolphin populations. Should this be the case, the freshwater occurrences of some lipotids might just represent various degrees of additional specialisation rather than fully independent invasions into freshwater. [1]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lipotidae</span> Family of river dolphins

Lipotidae is a family of river dolphins containing the possibly extinct baiji of China and the fossil genus Parapontoporia from the Late Miocene and Pliocene of the Pacific coast of North America. The genus Prolipotes, which is based on a mandible fragment from Neogene coastal deposits in Guangxi, China, has been classified as an extinct relative of the baiji, but is dubious. The oldest known member of the family is Eolipotes from the Late Miocene of Japan.

<i>Chimaerasuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Chimaerasuchus is an extinct genus of Chinese crocodyliform from the Early Cretaceous Wulong Formation. The four teeth in the very tip of its short snout gave it a "bucktoothed" appearance. Due its multicusped teeth and marked heterodonty, it is believed to have been an herbivore. Chimaerasuchus was originally discovered in the 1960s but not identified as a crocodyliform until 1995, instead thought to possibly be a multituberculate mammal. It is highly unusual, as only two other crocodyliforms have displayed any characteristics resembling its adaptations to herbivory.

<i>Arambourgisuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Arambourgisuchus is an extinct genus of dyrosaurid crocodylomorph from the late Palaeocene of Morocco, found in the region of Sidi Chenane in 2000, following collaboration by French and Moroccan institutions, and described in 2005 by a team led by palaeontologist Stéphane Jouve. Arambourgisuchus was a large animal with an elongated skull 1 meter in length.

<i>Adamantinasuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Adamantinasuchus is an extinct genus of notosuchian crocodylomorph from and named after the Late Cretaceous Adamantina Formation of Brazil. It is known from only one fossil, holotype UFRJ-DG 107-R, collected by William Nava. The fossil consists of a partial skull, fragmentary limb bones and a few broken vertebrae, and was found 25 kilometres (16 mi) southwest of the town of Marilia, near a reservoir dam. Adamantinasuchus was approximately 60 centimetres (24 in) long from nose to tail, and would have only weighed a few kilograms.

<i>Lazarussuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Lazarussuchus is an extinct genus of amphibious reptile, known from the Cenozoic of Europe. It is the youngest known member of Choristodera, an extinct order of aquatic reptiles that first appeared in the Middle Jurassic. Fossils have been found in Late Paleocene, Late Oligocene, Early Miocene and possibly Late Miocene deposits in France, Germany, and the Czech Republic. Two species have been named: the type species L. inexpectatus ("unexpected") from the late Oligocene of France. and L. dvoraki from the early Miocene of the Czech Republic. It was not a large animal; with the total preserved body and tail length of L. inexpectatus being just over 30 centimetres. A complete specimen of Lazarussuchus with preserved soft tissue was found from the Late Paleocene of France, but has not been assigned to a species.

<i>Parapontoporia</i> Extinct genus of mammals

Parapontoporia is an extinct genus of dolphin that lived off the Pacific coast of North America from the Late Miocene until the genus' extinction during the Pliocene. It is related to the baiji. Fossils have been found in California and Mexico. The Tulare Formation is predominately freshwater, which suggests Parapontoporia may have been tolerant of both salt and fresh water.

<i>Labidosaurikos</i> Extinct genus of tetrapods

Labidosaurikos is a genus of extinct captorhinid tetrapods that lived around 279 to 272 million years ago during Kungurian age of the lower Permian. The American paleontologist John Willis Stovall first described Labidosaurikos in 1950, naming it "Labidosaurus like" for the striking similarity of the holotype skull of his specimen to the cranial anatomy of another captorhinid Labidosaurus hamatus.

<i>Eutretauranosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Eutretauranosuchus is an extinct genus of goniopholidid crocodyliform. E. delfsi is the only known species within the genus.

<i>Australodelphis</i> Extinct genus of mammals

Australodelphis mirus is an extinct Pliocene dolphin. A. mirus is known from fossils found in the Sørsdal Formation, Mule Peninsula, Vestfold Hills, East Antarctica. The genus has been described as an example of convergent evolution with beaked whales.

<i>Eothoracosaurus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Eothoracosaurus is an extinct monospecific genus of eusuchian crocodylomorphs found in Eastern United States which existed during the Late Cretaceous period. Eothoracosaurus is considered to belong to an informally named clade called the "thoracosaurs", named after the closely related Thoracosaurus. Thoracosaurs in general were traditionally thought to be related to the modern false gharial, largely because the nasal bones contact the premaxillae, but phylogenetic work starting in the 1990s instead supported affinities within gavialoid exclusive of such forms. Even more recent phylogenetic studies suggest that thoracosaurs might instead be non-crocodilian eusuchians.

<i>Xixiasaurus</i> Genus of dinosaur

Xixiasaurus is a genus of troodontid dinosaur that lived during the Late Cretaceous Period in what is now China. The only known specimen was discovered in Xixia County, Henan Province, in central China, and became the holotype of the new genus and species Xixiasaurus henanensis in 2010. The names refer to the areas of discovery, and can be translated as "Henan Xixia lizard". The specimen consists of an almost complete skull, part of the lower jaw, and teeth, as well as a partial right forelimb.

<i>Tranatocetus</i> Extinct genus of mammals

Tranatocetus is an extinct genus of mysticete from the late Miocene (Tortonian) of Jutland, Denmark. The type and only species is Tranatocetus argillarius.

<i>Astorgosuchus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Astorgosuchus is an extinct monospecific genus of crocodilian, closely related to true crocodiles, that lived in Pakistan during the late Oligocene period. This crocodile may have reached lengths of up to 7–8 m (23–26 ft) and is known to have preyed on many of the large mammals found in its environment. Bite marks of a large crocodile have been found on the bones of juvenile Paraceratherium, however if these were left by Astorgosuchus cannot be said with certainty. The genus contains a single species, Astorgosuchus bugtiensis, which was originally named as a species of Crocodylus in 1908 and was moved to its own genus in 2019.

<i>Allodelphis</i> Extinct genus of whale

Allodelphis is an extinct genus of whale belonging to Allodelphinidae found in marine deposits of the eastern North Pacific.

Allodelphinidae is a family of primitive platanistoid river dolphins found in marine deposits in the eastern North Pacific region, Alaska, and Japan.

<i>Lophocetus</i> Extinct genus of dolphins

Lophocetus is an extinct genus of dolphin belonging to the clade Delphinida that is known from late Miocene (Tortonian) marine deposits in California and Maryland. Although usually placed in Kentriodontidae, recent studies have found it only distantly related to Kentriodon.

<i>Arktocara</i> Extinct genus of mammals

Arktocara is an extinct genus of river dolphin from the Oligocene epoch of Alaska, containing one species, A. yakataga. Having been discovered in 25-million-year-old strata near the 60th parallel north, it is perhaps the oldest-known crown toothed whale and the northmost river dolphin discovered. It was a member of the now-extinct family Allodelphinidae, along with the genera Allodelphis, Goedertius, Ninjadelphis, and Zarhinocetus. It measured approximately 2.26 or 2.28 meters, comparable to its closest living relative, the South Asian river dolphin, which measures 2.4 meters (7.9 ft). However, the animal probably had an elongated beak and neck, so it may have been longer. The animal is known only from a partially preserved skull. Its ecology may have been similar to the modern-day Dall's porpoise, and it may have competed with contemporaneous delphinoids. Its remains were found in the Poul Creek Formation, which has also yielded several mollusk species.

<i>Chinatichampsus</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Chinatichampsus is an extinct genus of crocodilian from the Devil's Graveyard Formation of Texas, specifically the Dalquest Desert Research Site. It is a monotypic genus, containing only the type species Chintanichampsus wilsonorum. A single specimen, TMM 45911–1, was first discovered in 2010. Chinatichampsus is the most basal Eocene caimanine, dating to between 42.8 and 41.5 million years ago, and is considered to be more basal than Protocaiman.

<i>Kosmodraco</i> Extinct genus of reptiles

Kosmodraco is a genus of large bodied choristodere from the Paleocene of North America. Originally described as a species of Simoedosaurus, it was found to represent a distinct genus in 2022. Multiple fossil skulls show a relatively short and robust snout and a skull that is considerably wider behind the eyes. Two species are currently recognized, K. dakotensis and K. magnicornis.

<i>Pebanista</i> Extinct genus of freshwater dolphins

Pebanista is an extinct genus of platanistid "river dolphin" that lived during the Early to Middle Miocene in Peru. As a member of the Platanistidae, Pebanista is most closely related to the extant Ganges and Indus river dolphins (Platanista) of South Asia and shares no close relation to the modern Amazon river dolphin that inhabits the same region today. Like its close relatives, Pebanista possesses enlarged crests that would have covered the melon in life, possibly helping to focus their biosonar while hunting in murky waters. Pebanista further stands out as being the largest "river dolphin" yet discovered, reaching lengths between 2.8–3.47 m at minimum, much larger than the biggest recorded freshwater cetaceans of today. Given its relatively robust if elongated snout, it is thought that Pebanista was an active predator, profiting from the rich prey selection available to it in the enormous Pebas wetlands that covered South America during the early parts of the Miocene. Only a single species of Pebanista is known so far: P. yacuruna.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kimura, T.; Hasegawa, Y. (2024). "New Fossil Lipotid (Cetacea, Delphinida) from the Upper Miocene of Japan". Paleontological Research. 28 (4): 1–23. doi:10.2517/PR220027.