Game day recycling

Last updated

Game day recycling is the idea that having large crowds of people in a small, concentrated space will generate a great deal of refuse and products that require recycling. A home football game at a college with a high-capacity stadium can attract up to 110,000 people. [1] However, because colleges only play a limited number of games at home throughout each season, the game-day recycling programs are usually specialized and separated from the school’s regular recycling program.

Contents

Campuses primarily implement programs to deal with the considerable amount of trash and recycling generated by fans and to ensure sustainability. Furthermore, tailgaters bring copious amounts of food and refreshments, producing the most waste during a game day. [2] Moreover, inside the stadium, programs, concessions, beverages, and vending machine items also contribute significantly to the total waste.

Current Campus Programs

Harvard

Harvard began its sustainability efforts when a panel of students and faculty began meeting in 1999 to discuss ways the campus could become more green. [3] The "Harvard Green Campus Initiative" began in 2001, which led to a greater need for a more central office for sustainability efforts. The Harvard Office for Sustainability was established in the fall of 2008 and now oversees the game day recycling program.

Harvard’s game day recycling program is supported by Harvard, the Office for Sustainability, and the President’s office. [4] On game days, Harvard provides "clearstream" bags, [5] recycling bins, safety vests, gloves and “tailgate bags” for volunteers. [4] The Office for Sustainability recruits employees who have environmental knowledge, produced a game day recycling video and recruits volunteers for game days and other stadium events. [4] The President’s Office encourages all the departments to cut carbon and be green, and the president attends all game days. Harvard participated in the EPA’s Game Day Challenge in its first two years, 2009 and 2010. (See below).

University of Colorado

The University of Colorado established its recycling program in 1976. [6] The recycling center works with many departments and student groups to accomplish its mission. It operates as a partnership between facilities management (run by the administration) and the student union. [7]

Ralphie's Green Stampede [8] was formed in 2008 to deal specifically with game day recycling. [7] It is a zero waste and carbon reduction program that began at Folsom Field Archived 2010-10-20 at the Wayback Machine during football games and now has expanded to include the Coors Events Center and all of CU’s sporting events. Its goal is to reach zero waste at the stadium. Folsom Field provides cups and food containers made from compostable materials and has “zero-waste” stations throughout the stadium. It was the first major sports stadium in the nation to run a zero-waste process.

The CU game day recycling program’s accomplishments, which were outlined in its report to the EPA's GameDay Challenge include having an 80-90 percent diversion, no public trashcans, about 25 attended zero-waste stations, more than 90 percent compostable or recyclable packaging and high and broad support. [9] The program involves its vendors for large events, encouraging them to provide packaging made with eco-friendly materials, compost their food waste, use bulk condiment dispensers, instruct their employees in proper recycling practices, and track and report their annual progress. [10] Ralphie’s Green Stampede also provided equipment, signage, and posters to encourage and facilitate recycling.

University of Florida

The University of Florida TailGator Green Team was established in 2006 [11] to manage waste at the Ben Hill Griffin Stadium during game days. It works to collect recyclable products generated by the masses of people surrounding the stadium while tailgating. The TailGator gameday recycling program relies on volunteers to operate. In its first year, it diverted over 26,500 pounds from the landfill. [11] Since that first year, the Green Team has collected 62.34 tons of trash, which greatly reduced the waste produced on gamedays. [12] Along with managing waste, the TailGator Green Team works to educate students on the proper ways of recycling. The team works in areas with high student concentrations based on where tailgates and other gameday events are occurring to tell individuals how and what to recycle. [13]

EPA involvement

The EPA is a government agency whose purpose is to ensure the safety of humans and their environment. [14] The EPA has implemented a Game Day Challenge in an effort to reduce the amount of waste accumulated during college football games. [15] This Challenge is an initiative of the EPA’s WasteWise program. WasteWise [16] is a free partnership program that assists its collaborators in meeting their specific goals to reduce and recycle industrial and municipal solid wastes. [17] As part of the Game Day Challenge, colleges across the country compete to determine which university can reduce, reuse and recycle the most waste. [15] Participating colleges and universities have the opportunity to design and implement a waste reduction program for one home football game during the month of October. The schools need to measure the results by tracking and recording data on the amount of waste generated at the football game, the number of recyclables collected and the total number of people in attendance at the game. [18] Once numbers are reported by the schools, the EPA announces the results and winners during the month of November. [15]

The overall purpose of the Game Day Challenge is to reduce the amount of waste produced at college football games. The program hopes to increase awareness and expand participation by students, faculty, and the entire school community in waste reduction programs in an effort to make college campuses more sustainable. [15]

History

The Game Day Challenge began in 2009 and eight schools participated. [19] The eight schools that participated were:

  1. Auburn University
  2. Brigham Young University
  3. Harvard University
  4. North Carolina State University
  5. Ohio University
  6. University of Colorado
  7. University of Michigan
  8. West Virginia University

By the 2010 challenge, the number of participating schools greatly increased. The number rose from 8 to 88 universities competing in the Game Day Challenge. [20] The 2010 schools are:

  1. Alcorn State University
  2. Appalachian State University
  3. Auburn University
  4. Baylor University
  5. Bowling Green State University
  6. Brigham Young University
  7. Bucknell University
  8. California Polytechnic State University
  9. Central Connecticut State University
  10. Central Michigan University
  11. Clemson University
  12. Duke University
  13. Eastern Michigan University
  14. Eastern Washington University
  15. Fairmont State University
  16. Florida A & M University
  17. Georgia Institute of Technology
  18. Harding University
  19. Harvard University
  20. Illinois State University
  21. Indiana University
  22. Iowa State University
  23. Ithaca College
  24. Kansas State University
  25. Lackawanna College
  26. Loras College
  27. Louisiana State University
  28. Marietta College
  29. Marist College
  30. Mesa Community College
  31. Middle Tennessee State University
  32. Montana State University
  33. North Carolina State University
  34. Northwest Missouri State University
  35. Northwestern University
  36. Ohio University
  37. Oregon State University
  38. Princeton University
  39. Purdue University - ICA
  40. Rice University
  41. Rutgers University
  42. Southern Illinois University Carbondale
  43. Southern Methodist University
  44. Syracuse University
  45. The Florida State University
  46. The Ohio State University
  47. The University of Alabama
  48. The University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
  49. The University of Central Oklahoma
  50. The University of Rhode Island
  51. The University of Tulsa
  52. Union College
  53. University at Buffalo
  54. University of California, Berkeley
  55. University of California, Davis
  56. University of Central Florida
  57. University of Florida
  58. University of Georgia
  59. University of Kentucky
  60. University of Maine
  61. University of Maryland
  62. University of Miami
  63. University of Michigan
  64. University of Minnesota
  65. University of Mississippi
  66. University of Missouri
  67. University of Montana
  68. University of Nebraska–Lincoln
  69. University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
  70. University of North Texas
  71. University of Notre Dame
  72. University of Oregon
  73. University of Rochester
  74. University of South Florida
  75. University of Tennessee - Knoxville
  76. University of Tennessee at Martin
  77. University of Texas
  78. University of Virginia
  79. University of Washington
  80. Vanderbilt University
  81. Virginia State University
  82. Virginia Tech
  83. Washington State University
  84. West Virginia University
  85. West Virginia Wesleyan College
  86. Western Kentucky University
  87. Western New England College
  88. Yale University

Categories

The EPA divided the competition into five categories and awards are presented for each category:

  1. Waste Generation: The Waste Generation category determines the ranks of schools by their per capita weight of waste generated. This is calculated by measuring the total waste produced, which includes trash, recyclables and compostables and dividing it by the total attendance at the game. This figure is the amount of waste that is produced per person at the game. The University with the lowest per capita waste generation wins the waste generation category. [2] [18]
  2. Diversion Rate: The Diversion Rate category ranks schools based on their recycling rate, which is measured by comparing the amount of waste recycled to the total waste produced. The winner of this category is the school that has the largest recycling rate. [2] [18]
  3. Greenhouse Gas Reduction: This category ranks schools based on their reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. As waste sits in municipal landfills, greenhouse gases are emitted into the atmosphere. However, when waste is recycled, these greenhouse gas emissions are reduced. The total reductions in emissions that are identified with the schools waste reduction accomplishments are calculated using the EPA’s WARM factors that are programmed in the WasteWise Re-TRAC system. The greenhouse gas reductions are divided by the total game attendance, in order to get a number for the greenhouse gas emission reductions per person. The school with the highest greenhouse gas reduction rate wins. [2] [18]
  4. Recycling: The Recycling category ranks schools by the amount of material recycled per person. The weight of recycled material including paper, plastic, glass and cardboard will be totaled and divided by the number of people in attendance at the game. The winner of this category is the school that has the highest recycling rate. [2] [18]
  5. Organics Reduction: Organics Reduction category bases their ranking on the per capita weight of reduced organics. The overall weight of reduced organics, which incorporates compostable materials that are either donated, reused, or composted will be divided by the number of people attending the game. The winner of this category is the school with the highest organic reduction rate. [2] [18]

Results for the 2009 EPA GameDay Challenge

In 2009, more than 40,000 pounds of waste were reduced through the combined efforts of the eight schools. This is equal to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by more than 105 metric tons. This number is comparable to the amount of greenhouse emissions that are produced annually from the consumption of about 12,000 gallons of gasoline or equal to the annual emissions generated from about 4,400 propane cylinders used to fuel gas grills. [19]

The University of Colorado placed first in the categories of Diversion Rate, Gross Green House Gas Reductions through Waste Reduction and Per Capita Composting. Ohio University ranked first in Per Capita Waste Generation. Harvard University took the first place rank in Per Capita Recycling. [19]

The results from the 2010 Game Day Challenge will be posted on the EPA website on November 30, 2010. [19]

See also

Related Research Articles

Articles related to waste management include:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Municipal solid waste</span> Type of waste consisting of everyday items discarded by the public

Municipal solid waste (MSW), commonly known as trash or garbage in the United States and rubbish in Britain, is a waste type consisting of everyday items that are discarded by the public. "Garbage" can also refer specifically to food waste, as in a garbage disposal; the two are sometimes collected separately. In the European Union, the semantic definition is 'mixed municipal waste,' given waste code 20 03 01 in the European Waste Catalog. Although the waste may originate from a number of sources that has nothing to do with a municipality, the traditional role of municipalities in collecting and managing these kinds of waste have produced the particular etymology 'municipal.'

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green waste</span> Biodegradable waste

Green waste, also known as "biological waste", is any organic waste that can be composted. It is most usually composed of refuse from gardens such as grass clippings or leaves, and domestic or industrial kitchen wastes. Green waste does not include things such as dried leaves, pine straw, or hay. Such materials are rich in carbon and considered "brown wastes," while green wastes contain high concentrations of nitrogen. Green waste can be used to increase the efficiency of many composting operations and can be added to soil to sustain local nutrient cycling.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biodegradable waste</span> Organic matter that can be broken down

Biodegradable waste includes any organic matter in waste which can be broken down into carbon dioxide, water, methane, compost, humus, and simple organic molecules by micro-organisms and other living things by composting, aerobic digestion, anaerobic digestion or similar processes. It mainly includes kitchen waste, ash, soil, dung and other plant matter. In waste management, it also includes some inorganic materials which can be decomposed by bacteria. Such materials include gypsum and its products such as plasterboard and other simple sulfates which can be decomposed by sulfate reducing bacteria to yield hydrogen sulfide in anaerobic land-fill conditions.

Sustainable advertising addresses the carbon footprint and other negative environmental and social impacts associated with the production and distribution of advertising materials. A growing number of companies are making a commitment to the reduction of their environmental impact associated with advertising production and distribution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food rescue</span> Recovery and donation of wasted edible food

Food rescue, also called food recovery, food salvage or surplus food redistribution, is the practice of gleaning edible food that would otherwise go to waste from places such as farms, produce markets, grocery stores, restaurants, or dining facilities and distributing it to local emergency food programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions by the United States</span> Climate changing gases from the North American country

The United States produced 5.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in 2020, the second largest in the world after greenhouse gas emissions by China and among the countries with the highest greenhouse gas emissions per person. In 2019 China is estimated to have emitted 27% of world GHG, followed by the United States with 11%, then India with 6.6%. In total the United States has emitted a quarter of world GHG, more than any other country. Annual emissions are over 15 tons per person and, amongst the top eight emitters, is the highest country by greenhouse gas emissions per person.

The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery is a branch of the California Environmental Protection Agency that oversees the state's waste management, recycling, and waste reduction programs. CalRecycle was established in 2010 to replace the California Integrated Waste Management Board. It is known for administering the California Redemption Value (CRV) program, among other responsibilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Demolition waste</span> Waste debris from destruction of buildings, roads, bridges, or other structures

Demolition waste is waste debris from destruction of buildings, roads, bridges, or other structures. Debris varies in composition, but the major components, by weight, in the US include concrete, wood products, asphalt shingles, brick and clay tile, steel, and drywall. There is the potential to recycle many elements of demolition waste.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">EPA Sustainability</span>

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established in July 1970 when the White House and the United States Congress came together due to the public's demand for cleaner natural resources. The purpose of the EPA is to repair the damage done to the environment and to set up new criteria to allow Americans to make a clean environment a reality. The ultimate goal of the EPA is to protect human health and the environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Source-separated organics</span>

Source-separated organics (SSO) is the system by which waste generators segregate compostable materials from other waste streams at the source for separate collection.

Green Action Centre (GAC) Formally known as the Recycling Council of Manitoba and the Resource Conservation Manitoba is an environmental, non-profit organization based in Manitoba, Canada. It includes promoting greener living through environmental education for households, workplaces, schools, and communities. It also develops and advocates environmental policies for the Manitoba communities. Its primary areas of activity include; green commuting, composting and waste, sustainable living, and resource conservation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green home</span>

A green home is a type of house designed to be environmentally sustainable. Green homes focus on the efficient use of "energy, water, and building materials". A green home may use sustainably sourced, environmentally friendly, and/or recycled building materials. This includes materials like reclaimed wood, recycled metal, and low VOC paints. Additionally, green homes often prioritize energy efficiency by incorporating features, such as high-performance insulation, energy-efficient appliances, and smart home technologies that monitor and optimize energy usage. Water conservation is another important aspect, with green homes often featuring water-saving fixtures, rainwater harvesting systems, and grey water recycling systems to reduce water waste. It may include sustainable energy sources such as solar or geothermal, and be sited to take maximum advantage of natural features such as sunlight and tree cover to improve energy efficiency.

Solid waste policy in the United States is aimed at developing and implementing proper mechanisms to effectively manage solid waste. For solid waste policy to be effective, inputs should come from stakeholders, including citizens, businesses, community-based organizations, non-governmental organizations, government agencies, universities, and other research organizations. These inputs form the basis of policy frameworks that influence solid waste management decisions. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates household, industrial, manufacturing, and commercial solid and hazardous wastes under the 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Effective solid waste management is a cooperative effort involving federal, state, regional, and local entities. Thus, the RCRA's Solid Waste program section D encourages the environmental departments of each state to develop comprehensive plans to manage nonhazardous industrial and municipal solid waste.

The San Francisco Mandatory Recycling and Composting Ordinance is a local municipal ordinance requiring all persons located in San Francisco to separate their recyclables, compostables and landfilled trash and to participate in recycling and composting programs. Passed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 2009, it became the first local municipal ordinance in the United States to universally require source separation of all organic material, including food residuals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainability at American colleges and universities</span>

"Sustainability," was defined as “development which implies meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”as defined by the 1983 Brundtland Commission. As sustainability gains support and momentum worldwide, universities across the United States have expanded initiatives towards more sustainable campuses, commitments, academic offerings, and student engagement.

Statistical data shows that waste management in Winnipeg during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Food waste recycling in Hong Kong</span>

Food waste recycling is a process to convert food waste into useful materials and products for achieving sustainability of the environment. Food waste is defined as all parts of food, inedible and edible, created before, during, and after food processing, production, and consumption. Greenhouse gases, especially methane can be reduced by food waste recycling. Food waste recycling can also alleviate the saturation of landfill sites in Hong Kong.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable Technology Optimization Research Center</span>

The Sustainable Technology Optimization Research Center (STORC) is a research facility located on the California State University Sacramento campus. There are several players included in operations at the STORC including Sacramento State's Risk Management, the College of Engineering and Computer Science (ECS), and two professors in the Environmental Studies department Brook Murphy and Dudley Burton. The STORC facility is primarily maintained by California State University, Sacramento student interns and volunteers who use applied science and technology to address real world policy, food, health, and energy issues of present-day society. Research at the STORC encompasses engineering and science to test and evaluate new ideas and approaches of sustainable technology to solve environmental problems. Faculty and students address sustainability with an interdisciplinary studies approach. The STORC Vision is to become "an international resource for practical, scalable, and financially viable solutions in the area of sustainable technologies that are suitable for private and/or public sector operations related to the management of energy, food, water, and waste". The STORC Mission is "to demonstrate the operation of innovative commercially viable physical systems that are underpinned by sustainable technologies, and to disseminate the associated plans, public policy discourse, and scientific findings".

Sustainable Materials Management is a systemic approach to using and reusing materials more productively over their entire lifecycles. It represents a change in how a society thinks about the use of natural resources and environmental protection. By looking at a product's entire lifecycle new opportunities can be found to reduce environmental impacts, conserve resources, and reduce costs.

References

  1. ↑ Gardner, Tim. “Michigan's big house is back as the nation's biggest football stadium.” USA Today. 14 July 2010 Retrieved 16. Nov. 2010. http://content.usatoday.com/communities/campusrivalry/post/2010/07/michigans-big-house-is-back-as-the-nations-biggest-football-stadium/1
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 “Can your school talk trash? EPA Gameday Challenge encourages waste reduction at college football games. Sept. 2010. Retrieved 17 Nov. 2010. http://www.ecometrica.co.uk/blog/can-your-school-talk-trash/#_ftn1
  3. ↑ "History.” Harvard. 17 Nov. 2010. http://green.harvard.edu/ofs/history Archived 2010-09-23 at the Wayback Machine
  4. 1 2 3 “GameDay and beyond.” EPA WasteWise Webinar. 23 Sept. 2010. Retrieved 17 Nov 2010. http://www.epa.gov/osw/partnerships/wastewise/challenge/gameday/webinar/gogan2010.pdf
  5. ↑ a recycling bag system that facilitates sorting and clean-up: “On the go recycling with the clear stream recycler.” Resourceful. 17 Nov. 2010. http://www.clearstreamrecycler.com/ Archived 2011-02-07 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ↑ “Recycling” University of Colorado Environmental Center. 17. Nov. 2010. http://ecenter.colorado.edu/recycling
  7. 1 2 “Sustainability.” Life at CU. 17 Nov. 2010. http://admissions.colorado.edu/lifeatcu/sustainability Archived 2010-12-09 at the Wayback Machine
  8. ↑ http://www.cubuffs.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=600&ATCLID=1549954
  9. ↑ “Game Day Challenge.” United States Environmental Protection Agency. 16 Nov. 2010. http://www.epa.gov/wastes/partnerships/wastewise/challenge/gameday/
  10. ↑ DeBell, Jack. “Ralphie’s green stampede: CU’s drive to zero-waste.” 17 Nov. 2010.http://www.cubuffs.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=600&ATCLID=1549954
  11. 1 2 “Recycle” UF Office of Sustainability. 17 Nov. 2010. http://www.sustainability.ufl.edu/greenteam/recycle.html Archived 2010-06-10 at the Wayback Machine
  12. ↑ Sims, Stephanie. "Gators to compete for recycle title at homecoming game." 13 Oct. 2010. Accessed 17 Nov. 2010. http://news.ufl.edu/2010/10/13/epa-gameday/ Archived 2010-12-06 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ↑ "TailGator Gameday Recycling Program". Sustainability. Retrieved 2022-01-09.
  14. ↑ “Our Mission and What We Do.” United States Environmental Protection Agency. 16 Nov. 2010. http://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/whatwedo.html
  15. 1 2 3 4 “Game Day Challenge.” United States Environmental Protection Agency. 16 Nov. 2010. http://www.epa.gov/wastes/partnerships/wastewise/challenge/gameday/
  16. ↑ https://web.archive.org/web/20110727185339/http://www.pprc.org/webinars/downloads/EPA%20Waste%20Wise.pdf
  17. ↑ “Wastes- Partnerships- WasteWise Program. About WasteWise.” United States Environmental Protection Agency. 16 Nov. 2010. http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/partnerships/wastewise/about.htm
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 “Measuring and Reporting.” United States Environmental Protection Agency. 17 Nov. 2010. http://www.epa.gov/wastes/partnerships/wastewise/challenge/gameday/measure.htm
  19. 1 2 3 4 “Results.” United States Environmental Protection Agency. 17 Nov. 2010. http://www.epa.gov/wastes/partnerships/wastewise/challenge/gameday/results.htm
  20. ↑ “Participating Schools.” United States Environmental Protection Agency. 17 Nov. 2010. http://www.epa.gov/wastes/partnerships/wastewise/challenge/gameday/schools.htm
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.