Handshaking lemma

Last updated

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, the handshaking lemma is the statement that, in every finite undirected graph, the number of vertices that touch an odd number of edges is even. In more colloquial terms, in a party of people some of whom shake hands, the number of people who shake an odd number of other people's hands is even. [1] The handshaking lemma is a consequence of the degree sum formula, also sometimes called the handshaking lemma, [2] according to which the sum of the degrees (the numbers of times each vertex is touched) equals twice the number of edges in the graph. Both results were proven by LeonhardEuler  ( 1736 ) in his famous paper on the Seven Bridges of Königsberg that began the study of graph theory. [3]

Contents

Beyond the Bridges of Königsberg and their generalization to Euler tours, other applications include proving that for certain combinatorial structures, the number of structures is always even, and assisting with the proofs of Sperner's lemma and the mountain climbing problem. The complexity class PPA encapsulates the difficulty of finding a second odd vertex, given one such vertex in a large implicitly-defined graph.

Definitions and statement

An undirected graph consists of a system of vertices, and edges connecting unordered pairs of vertices. In any graph, the degree ${\displaystyle \deg(v)}$ of a vertex ${\displaystyle v}$ is defined as the number of edges that have ${\displaystyle v}$ as an endpoint. For graphs that are allowed to contain loops connecting a vertex to itself, a loop should be counted as contributing two units to the degree of its endpoint for the purposes of the handshaking lemma. [2] Then, the handshaking lemma states that, in every finite graph, there must be an even number of vertices for which ${\displaystyle \deg(v)}$ is an odd number. [1] The vertices of odd degree in a graph are sometimes called odd nodes [4] or odd vertices; [5] in this terminology, the handshaking lemma can be rephrased as the statement that every graph has an even number of odd nodes. [4] [5]

The degree sum formula states that

${\displaystyle \sum _{v\in V}\deg v=2|E|,}$

where ${\displaystyle V}$ is the set of vertices in the graph and ${\displaystyle E}$ is the set of edges in the graph. That is, the sum of the vertex degrees equals twice the number of edges. [6] In directed graphs, another form of the degree-sum formula states that the sum of in-degrees of all vertices, and the sum of out-degrees, both equal the number of edges. Here, the in-degree is the number of incoming edges, and the out-degree is the number of outgoing edges. [7] A version of the degree sum formula also applies to finite families of sets or, equivalently, multigraphs: the sum of the degrees of the elements (where the degree equals the number of sets containing it) always equals the sum of the cardinalities of the sets. [8]

Both results also apply to any subgraph of the given graph and in particular to its connected components. A consequence is that, for any odd vertex, there must exist a path connecting it to another odd vertex. [9]

Applications

Euler paths and tours

Schematic view of Königsberg's seven bridges
Graph with vertices for each land mass and an edge for each bridge

Leonhard Euler first proved the handshaking lemma in his work on the Seven Bridges of Königsberg, asking for a walking tour of the city of Königsberg (now Kaliningrad) crossing each of its seven bridges once. This can be translated into graph-theoretic terms as asking for an Euler path or Euler tour of a connected graph representing the city and its bridges: a walk through the graph that traverses each edge once, either ending at a different vertex than it starts in the case of an Euler path or returning to its starting point in the case of an Euler tour. Euler stated the fundamental results for this problem in terms of the number of odd vertices in the graph, which the handshaking lemma restricts to be an even number. If this number is zero, an Euler tour exists, and if it is two, an Euler path exists. Otherwise, the problem cannot be solved. In the case of the Seven Bridges of Königsberg, the graph representing the problem has four odd vertices, and has neither an Euler path nor an Euler tour. [3]

In the Christofides–Serdyukov algorithm for approximating the traveling salesperson problem, the fact that the number of odd vertices is even plays a key role, allowing the algorithm to connect those vertices in pairs in order to construct a graph on which an Euler tour forms an approximate TSP tour. [10]

Combinatorial enumeration

Several combinatorial structures may be shown to be even in number by relating them to the odd vertices in an appropriate "exchange graph". [11]

For instance, as C. A. B. Smith proved, in any cubic graph ${\displaystyle G}$ there must be an even number of Hamiltonian cycles through any fixed edge ${\displaystyle uv}$; these are cycles that pass through each vertex exactly once. Thomason (1978) used a proof based on the handshaking lemma to extend this result to graphs in which all vertices have odd degree. Thomason defines an exchange graph ${\displaystyle H}$, the vertices of which are in one-to-one correspondence with the Hamiltonian paths in ${\displaystyle G}$ beginning at ${\displaystyle u}$ and continuing through edge ${\displaystyle uv}$. Two such paths ${\displaystyle p_{1}}$ and ${\displaystyle p_{2}}$ are defined as being connected by an edge in ${\displaystyle H}$ if one may obtain ${\displaystyle p_{2}}$ by adding a new edge to the end of ${\displaystyle p_{1}}$ and removing another edge from the middle of ${\displaystyle p_{1}}$. This operation is reversible, forming a symmetric relation, so ${\displaystyle H}$ is an undirected graph. If path ${\displaystyle p}$ ends at vertex ${\displaystyle w}$, then the vertex corresponding to ${\displaystyle p}$ in ${\displaystyle H}$ has degree equal to the number of ways that ${\displaystyle p}$ may be extended by an edge that does not connect back to ${\displaystyle u}$; that is, the degree of this vertex in ${\displaystyle H}$ is either ${\displaystyle \deg(w)-1}$ (an even number) if ${\displaystyle p}$ does not form part of a Hamiltonian cycle through ${\displaystyle uv}$, or ${\displaystyle \deg(w)-2}$ (an odd number) if ${\displaystyle p}$ is part of a Hamiltonian cycle through ${\displaystyle uv}$. Since ${\displaystyle H}$ has an even number of odd vertices, ${\displaystyle G}$ must have an even number of Hamiltonian cycles through ${\displaystyle uv}$. [12]

Other applications

The handshaking lemma and degree sum formula are also used in proofs of several other results in mathematics. These include the following:

• Sperner's lemma states that, if a big triangle is subdivided into smaller triangles meeting edge-to-edge, and the vertices are labeled with three colors so that only two of the colors are used along each edge of the big triangle, then at least one of the smaller triangles has vertices of all three colors; it has applications in fixed-point theorems, root-finding algorithms, and fair division. One proof of this lemma forms an exchange graph whose vertices are the triangles (both small and large) and whose edges connect pairs of triangles that share two vertices of some particular two colors. The big triangle necessarily has odd degree in this exchange graph, as does a small triangle with all three colors, but not the other small triangles. By the handshaking lemma, there must be an odd number of small triangles with all three colors, and therefore at least one such triangle must exist. [13]
• The mountain climbing problem states that, for sufficiently well-behaved functions on a unit interval, with equal values at the ends of the interval, it is possible to coordinate the motion of two points, starting from opposite ends of the interval, so that they meet somewhere in the middle while remaining at points of equal value throughout the motion. One proof of this involves approximating the function by a piecewise linear function with the same extreme points, parameterizing the position of the two moving points by the coordinates of a single point in the unit square, and showing that the available positions for the two points form a finite graph, embedded in this square, with only the starting position and its reversal as odd vertices. By the handshaking lemma, these two positions belong to the same connected component of the graph, and a path from one to the other necessarily passes through the desired meeting point. [14]
• The reconstruction conjecture concerns the problem of uniquely determining the structure of a graph from the multiset of subgraphs formed by removing a single vertex from it. Given this information, the degree-sum formula can be used to recover the number of edges in the given graph and the degrees of each vertex. From this, it is possible to determine whether the given graph is a regular graph, and if so to determine it uniquely from any vertex-deleted subgraph by adding a new neighbor for all the subgraph vertices of too-low degree. Therefore, all regular graphs can be reconstructed. [15]
• The game of Hex is played by two players, who place pieces of their color on a tiling of a parallelogram-shaped board by hexagons until one player has a connected path of adjacent pieces from one side of the board to the other. It can never end in a draw: by the time the board has been completely filled with pieces, one of the players will have formed a winning path. One proof of this forms a graph from a filled game board, with vertices at the corners of the hexagons, and with edges on sides of hexagons that separate the two players' colors. This graph has four odd vertices at the corners of the board, and even vertices elsewhere, so it must contain a path connecting two corners, which necessarily has a winning path for one player on one of its sides. [16]

Proof

Euler's proof of the degree sum formula uses the technique of double counting: he counts the number of incident pairs ${\displaystyle (v,e)}$ where ${\displaystyle e}$ is an edge and vertex ${\displaystyle v}$ is one of its endpoints, in two different ways. Vertex ${\displaystyle v}$ belongs to ${\displaystyle \deg(v)}$ pairs, where ${\displaystyle \deg(v)}$ (the degree of ${\displaystyle v}$) is the number of edges incident to it. Therefore, the number of incident pairs is the sum of the degrees. However, each edge in the graph belongs to exactly two incident pairs, one for each of its endpoints; therefore, the number of incident pairs is ${\displaystyle 2|E|}$. Since these two formulas count the same set of objects, they must have equal values. The same proof can be interpreted as summing the entries of the incidence matrix of the graph in two ways, by rows to get the sum of degrees and by columns to get twice the number of edges. [5]

For graphs, the handshaking lemma follows as a corollary of the degree sum formula. [8] In a sum of integers, the parity of the sum is not affected by the even terms in the sum; the overall sum is even when there is an even number of odd terms, and odd when there is an odd number of odd terms. Since one side of the degree sum formula is the even number ${\displaystyle 2|E|}$, the sum on the other side must have an even number of odd terms; that is, there must be an even number of odd-degree vertices. [5]

Alternatively, it is possible to use mathematical induction to prove the degree sum formula, [2] or to prove directly that the number of odd-degree vertices is even, by removing one edge at a time from a given graph and using a case analysis on the degrees of its endpoints to determine the effect of this removal on the parity of the number of odd-degree vertices. [17]

In special classes of graphs

The Clebsch graph, regular of degree five, has an even number of vertices (16) and a number of edges (40) that is a multiple of five.
The rhombic dodecahedron is biregular with six vertices of degree four and eight vertices of degree three; 6 × 4 = 8 × 3 = 24, its number of edges.

Regular graphs

The degree sum formula implies that every ${\displaystyle r}$-regular graph with ${\displaystyle n}$ vertices has ${\displaystyle nr/2}$ edges. [18] Because the number of edges must be an integer, it follows that when ${\displaystyle r}$ is odd the number of vertices must be even. [19] Additionally, for odd values of ${\displaystyle r}$, the number of edges must be divisible by ${\displaystyle r}$. [20]

Bipartite and biregular graphs

A bipartite graph has its vertices split into two subsets, with each edge having one endpoint in each subset. It follows from the same double counting argument that, in each subset, the sum of degrees equals the number of edges in the graph. In particular, both subsets have equal degree sums. [21] For biregular graphs, with a partition of the vertices into subsets ${\displaystyle V_{1}}$ and ${\displaystyle V_{2}}$ with every vertex in a subset ${\displaystyle V_{i}}$ having degree ${\displaystyle r_{i}}$, it must be the case that ${\displaystyle |V_{1}|r_{1}=|V_{2}|r_{2}}$; both equal the number of edges. [22]

Infinite graphs

The handshaking lemma does not apply in its usual form to infinite graphs, even when they have only a finite number of odd-degree vertices. For instance, an infinite path graph with one endpoint has only a single odd-degree vertex rather than having an even number of such vertices. However, it is possible to formulate a version of the handshaking lemma using the concept of an end, an equivalence class of semi-infinite paths ("rays") considering two rays as equivalent when there exists a third ray that uses infinitely many vertices from each of them. The degree of an end is the maximum number of edge-disjoint rays that it contains, and an end is odd if its degree is finite and odd. More generally, it is possible to define an end as being odd or even, regardless of whether it has infinite degree, in graphs for which all vertices have finite degree. Then, in such graphs, the number of odd vertices and odd ends, added together, is either even or infinite. [23]

Computational complexity

In connection with the exchange graph method for proving the existence of combinatorial structures, it is of interest to ask how efficiently these structures may be found. For instance, suppose one is given as input a Hamiltonian cycle in a cubic graph; it follows from Smith's theorem that there exists a second cycle. How quickly can this second cycle be found? Papadimitriou (1994) investigated the computational complexity of questions such as this, or more generally of finding a second odd-degree vertex when one is given a single odd vertex in a large implicitly-defined graph. He defined the complexity class PPA to encapsulate problems such as this one; [24] a closely related class defined on directed graphs, PPAD, has attracted significant attention in algorithmic game theory because computing a Nash equilibrium is computationally equivalent to the hardest problems in this class. [25]

Computational problems proven to be complete for the complexity class PPA include computational tasks related to Sperner's lemma [26] and to fair subdivision of resources according to the Hobby–Rice theorem. [27]

Notes

1. Hein, James L. (2015), "Example 3: The Handshaking Problem", Discrete Structures, Logic, and Computability, Jones & Bartlett Publishers, p. 703, ISBN   9781284070408
2. Gunderson, David S. (2014), Handbook of Mathematical Induction: Theory and Applications, CRC Press, p. 240, ISBN   9781420093650
3. Euler, L. (1736), "Solutio problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis" (PDF), Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 8: 128–140. Reprinted and translated in Biggs, N. L.; Lloyd, E. K.; Wilson, R. J. (1976), Graph Theory 1736–1936, Oxford University Press
4. Higgins, Peter M. (1998), Mathematics for the Curious, Oxford University Press, p. 201, ISBN   9780192880727
5. Biggs, Norman L. (2002), "15.3: Degree", Discrete Mathematics, Oxford University Press, pp. 181–182, ISBN   9780198507178
6. West, Douglas B. (1996), "1.3.3. Theorem. (Degree-Sum Formula)", Introduction to Graph Theory (2nd ed.), Prentice Hall, p. 26, ISBN   9780132278287
7. Loehr, Nicholas (2011), "3.31. Theorem: Degree-Sum Formula for Digraphs", Bijective Combinatorics, CRC Press, p. 106, ISBN   9781439848869
8. Jukna, Stasys (2011), "Proposition 1.7", Extremal Combinatorics, Springer, p. 9, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17364-6
9. Ray, Santanu Saha (2012), "Theorem 2.2", Graph Theory with Algorithms and its Applications in Applied Science and Technology, Springer, p. 16, ISBN   9788132207504
10. Christofides, Nicos (1976), Worst-case analysis of a new heuristic for the travelling salesman problem (PDF), Report 388, Graduate School of Industrial Administration, CMU. The handshaking lemma is cited at the top of page 2.
11. Cameron, Kathie; Edmonds, Jack (1999), "Some graphic uses of an even number of odd nodes", Annales de l'Institut Fourier , 49 (3): 815–827, doi:, MR   1703426
12. Thomason, A. G. (1978), "Hamiltonian cycles and uniquely edge colourable graphs", Advances in Graph Theory (Cambridge Combinatorial Conf., Trinity College, Cambridge, 1977), Annals of Discrete Mathematics, 3, pp. 259–268, doi:10.1016/S0167-5060(08)70511-9, MR   0499124
13. Aigner, Martin; Ziegler, Günter M. (2018), "Section 28.6: Sperner's Lemma", Proofs from THE BOOK (6th ed.), Berlin: Springer, pp. 203–205, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-57265-8, ISBN   978-3-662-57264-1, MR   3823190
14. Goodman, Jacob E.; Pach, János; Yap, Chee-K. (1989), "Mountain climbing, ladder moving, and the ring-width of a polygon" (PDF), The American Mathematical Monthly , 96 (6): 494–510, doi:10.2307/2323971, JSTOR   2323971, MR   0999412
15. Lauri, Josef; Scapellato, Raffaele (2016), Topics in Graph Automorphisms and Reconstruction, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 432 (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–106, doi:10.1017/CBO9781316669846, ISBN   978-1-316-61044-2, MR   3496604
16. Gale, David (1979), "The game of Hex and the Brouwer fixed-point theorem", The American Mathematical Monthly , 86 (10): 818–827, doi:10.1080/00029890.1979.11994922, JSTOR   2320146, MR   0551501
17. Neto, Antonio Caminha Muniz (2018), An Excursion through Elementary Mathematics, Volume III: Discrete Mathematics and Polynomial Algebra, Problem Books in Mathematics, Springer, pp.  132, 562, ISBN   9783319779775
18. Aldous, Joan M.; Wilson, Robin J. (2000), "Theorem 2.2", Graphs and Applications: an Introductory Approach, Undergraduate Mathematics Series, The Open University, Springer-Verlag, p.  44, ISBN   978-1-85233-259-4
19. Wallis, W. D. (2011), "Section 7.1, Introduction to Graphs, Corollary 1", A Beginner's Guide to Discrete Mathematics (2nd ed.), Springer, p. 219, ISBN   9780817682866
20. Clark, John; Holton, Derek Allan (1995), "Problem 1.4.6", A First Look at Graph Theory, Allied Publishers, p. 16, ISBN   9788170234630
21. Lovász, László (2014), Combinatorial Problems and Exercises (2nd ed.), Elsevier, p. 281, ISBN   9780080933092
22. Pisanski, Tomaž; Servatius, Brigitte (2013), "2.3.4: Semiregular Bipartite Graphs", Configurations from a Graphical Viewpoint, Birkhäuser Advanced Texts: Basler Lehrbücher, New York: Birkhäuser/Springer, p. 35, doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-8364-1, ISBN   978-0-8176-8363-4, MR   2978043
23. Bruhn, Henning; Stein, Maya (2007), "On end degrees and infinite cycles in locally finite graphs", Combinatorica , 27 (3): 269–291, doi:10.1007/s00493-007-2149-0, MR   2345811 ; see Proposition 15, p. 284
24. Papadimitriou, Christos H. (1994), "On the complexity of the parity argument and other inefficient proofs of existence", Journal of Computer and System Sciences , 48 (3): 498–532, doi:10.1016/S0022-0000(05)80063-7, MR   1279412
25. Chen, Xi; Deng, Xiaotie (2006), "Settling the complexity of two-player Nash equilibrium", Proc. 47th Symp. Foundations of Computer Science , pp. 261–271, doi:10.1109/FOCS.2006.69, ECCC   TR05-140
26. Grigni, Michelangelo (2001), "A Sperner lemma complete for PPA", Information Processing Letters , 77 (5–6): 255–259, doi:10.1016/S0020-0190(00)00152-6, MR   1818525
27. Filos-Ratsikas, Aris; Goldberg, Paul W. (2018), "Consensus halving is PPA-complete", in Diakonikolas, Ilias; Kempe, David; Henzinger, Monika (eds.), Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2018, Los Angeles, CA, USA, June 25-29, 2018, pp. 51–64, arXiv:, doi:10.1145/3188745.3188880

Related Research Articles

In graph theory, a regular graph is a graph where each vertex has the same number of neighbors; i.e. every vertex has the same degree or valency. A regular directed graph must also satisfy the stronger condition that the indegree and outdegree of each vertex are equal to each other. A regular graph with vertices of degree is called a ‑regular graph or regular graph of degree . Also, from the handshaking lemma, a regular graph contains an even number of vertices with odd degree.

In the mathematical field of graph theory the Hamiltonian path problem and the Hamiltonian cycle problem are problems of determining whether a Hamiltonian path or a Hamiltonian cycle exists in a given graph. Both problems are NP-complete.

In graph theory, a cycle in a graph is a non-empty trail in which only the first and last vertices are equal. A directed cycle in a directed graph is a non-empty directed trail in which only the first and last vertices are equal.

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics and computer science, Guan's route problem, the Chinese postman problem, postman tour or route inspection problem is to find a shortest closed path or circuit that visits every edge of an (connected) undirected graph. When the graph has an Eulerian circuit, that circuit is an optimal solution. Otherwise, the optimization problem is to find the smallest number of graph edges to duplicate so that the resulting multigraph does have an Eulerian circuit. It can be solved in polynomial time.

In the mathematical field of graph theory, a bipartite graph is a graph whose vertices can be divided into two disjoint and independent sets and such that every edge connects a vertex in to one in . Vertex sets and are usually called the parts of the graph. Equivalently, a bipartite graph is a graph that does not contain any odd-length cycles.

In the mathematical field of graph theory, a Hamiltonian path is a path in an undirected or directed graph that visits each vertex exactly once. A Hamiltonian cycle is a Hamiltonian path that is a cycle. Determining whether such paths and cycles exist in graphs is the Hamiltonian path problem, which is NP-complete.

In combinatorics, double counting, also called counting in two ways, is a combinatorial proof technique for showing that two expressions are equal by demonstrating that they are two ways of counting the size of one set. In this technique, which van Lint & Wilson (2001) call "one of the most important tools in combinatorics", one describes a finite set from two perspectives leading to two distinct expressions for the size of the set. Since both expressions equal the size of the same set, they equal each other.

This is a glossary of graph theory. Graph theory is the study of graphs, systems of nodes or vertices connected in pairs by lines or edges.

In graph theory, an Eulerian trail is a trail in a finite graph that visits every edge exactly once. Similarly, an Eulerian circuit or Eulerian cycle is an Eulerian trail that starts and ends on the same vertex. They were first discussed by Leonhard Euler while solving the famous Seven Bridges of Königsberg problem in 1736. The problem can be stated mathematically like this:

In graph theory, Turán's theorem bounds the number of edges that can be included in an undirected graph that does not have a complete subgraph of a given size. It is one of the central results of extremal graph theory, an area studying the largest or smallest graphs with given properties, and is a special case of the forbidden subgraph problem on the maximum number of edges in a graph that does not have a given subgraph.

In mathematics, Sperner's lemma is a combinatorial result on colorings of triangulations, analogous to the Brouwer fixed point theorem, which is equivalent to it. It states that every Sperner coloring of a triangulation of an -dimensional simplex contains a cell whose vertices all have different colors.

In the mathematical discipline of graph theory, the line graph of an undirected graph G is another graph L(G) that represents the adjacencies between edges of G. L(G) is constructed in the following way: for each edge in G, make a vertex in L(G); for every two edges in G that have a vertex in common, make an edge between their corresponding vertices in L(G).

In graph theory, an edge coloring of a graph is an assignment of "colors" to the edges of the graph so that no two incident edges have the same color. For example, the figure to the right shows an edge coloring of a graph by the colors red, blue, and green. Edge colorings are one of several different types of graph coloring. The edge-coloring problem asks whether it is possible to color the edges of a given graph using at most k different colors, for a given value of k, or with the fewest possible colors. The minimum required number of colors for the edges of a given graph is called the chromatic index of the graph. For example, the edges of the graph in the illustration can be colored by three colors but cannot be colored by two colors, so the graph shown has chromatic index three.

In graph theory, the degree of a vertex of a graph is the number of edges that are incident to the vertex; in a multigraph, a loop contributes 2 to a vertex's degree, for the two ends of the edge. The degree of a vertex is denoted or . The maximum degree of a graph , denoted by , and the minimum degree of a graph, denoted by , are the maximum and minimum of its vertices' degrees. In the multigraph shown on the right, the maximum degree is 5 and the minimum degree is 0.

The Christofides algorithm or Christofides–Serdyukov algorithm is an algorithm for finding approximate solutions to the travelling salesman problem, on instances where the distances form a metric space . It is an approximation algorithm that guarantees that its solutions will be within a factor of 3/2 of the optimal solution length, and is named after Nicos Christofides and Anatoliy I. Serdyukov, who discovered it independently in 1976.

The discharging method is a technique used to prove lemmas in structural graph theory. Discharging is most well known for its central role in the proof of the four color theorem. The discharging method is used to prove that every graph in a certain class contains some subgraph from a specified list. The presence of the desired subgraph is then often used to prove a coloring result.

In mathematics, and more specifically in graph theory, a directed graph is a graph that is made up of a set of vertices connected by directed edges often called arcs.

In graph theory, a branch of mathematics, a Hamiltonian decomposition of a given graph is a partition of the edges of the graph into Hamiltonian cycles. Hamiltonian decompositions have been studied both for undirected graphs and for directed graphs. In the undirected case a Hamiltonian decomposition can also be described as a 2-factorization of the graph such that each factor is connected.

In computational complexity theory, PPA is a complexity class, standing for "Polynomial Parity Argument". Introduced by Christos Papadimitriou in 1994, PPA is a subclass of TFNP. It is a class of search problems that can be shown to be total by an application of the handshaking lemma: any undirected graph that has a vertex whose degree is an odd number must have some other vertex whose degree is an odd number. This observation means that if we are given a graph and an odd-degree vertex, and we are asked to find some other odd-degree vertex, then we are searching for something that is guaranteed to exist.

In the mathematical discipline of graph theory, Petersen's theorem, named after Julius Petersen, is one of the earliest results in graph theory and can be stated as follows:

Petersen's Theorem. Every cubic, bridgeless graph contains a perfect matching.