Heritability of IQ

Last updated

Research on the heritability of IQ inquires into the degree of variation in IQ within a population that is due to genetic variation between individuals in that population. There has been significant controversy in the academic community about the heritability of IQ since research on the issue began in the late nineteenth century. [1] [2] Intelligence in the normal range is a polygenic trait, meaning that it is influenced by more than one gene, [3] [4] and in the case of intelligence at least 500 genes. [5] Further, explaining the similarity in IQ of closely related persons requires careful study because environmental factors may be correlated with genetic factors. Outside the normal range, certain single gene genetic disorders, such as phenylketonuria, can negatively affect intelligence. [6]

Contents

Early twin studies of adult individuals have found a heritability of IQ between 57% and 73%, [7] with some recent studies showing heritability for IQ as high as 80%. [8] IQ goes from being weakly correlated with genetics for children, to being strongly correlated with genetics for late teens and adults. The heritability of IQ increases with the child's age and reaches a plateau at 14–16 [9] years old, continuing at that level well into adulthood. However, poor prenatal environment, malnutrition and disease are known to have lifelong deleterious effects. [10] [11] Estimates in the academic research of the heritability of IQ have varied from below 0.5 [1] to a high of 0.8 (where 1.0 indicates that monozygotic twins have no variance in IQ and 0 indicates that their IQs are completely uncorrelated). [12] Eric Turkheimer and colleagues (2003) found that for children of low socioeconomic status heritability of IQ falls almost to zero. [13] These results have been challenged by other researchers. IQ heritability increases during early childhood, but it is unclear whether it stabilizes thereafter. [14] A 1996 statement by the American Psychological Association gave about 0.45 for children and about .75 during and after adolescence. [15] A 2004 meta-analysis of reports in Current Directions in Psychological Science gave an overall estimate of around 0.85 for 18-year-olds and older. [16] The general figure for heritability of IQ is about 0.5 across multiple studies in varying populations. [17]

Although IQ differences between individuals have been shown to have a large hereditary component, it does not follow that disparities in IQ between groups have a genetic basis. [18] [19] [20] [21] The scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain average differences in IQ test performance between racial groups. [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]

Heritability and caveats

Heritability is a statistic used in the fields of breeding and genetics that estimates the degree of variation in a phenotypic trait in a population that is due to genetic variation between individuals in that population. [28] The concept of heritability can be expressed in the form of the following question: "What is the proportion of the variation in a given trait within a population that is not explained by the environment or random chance?" [29]

Estimates of heritability take values ranging from 0 to 1; a heritability estimate of 1 indicates that all variation in the trait in question is genetic in origin and a heritability estimate of 0 indicates that none of the variation is genetic. The determination of many traits can be considered primarily genetic under similar environmental backgrounds. For example, a 2006 study found that adult height has a heritability estimated at 0.80 when looking only at the height variation within families where the environment should be very similar. [30] Other traits have lower heritability estimates, which indicate a relatively larger environmental influence. For example, a twin study on the heritability of depression in men estimated it as 0.29, while it was 0.42 for women in the same study. [31]

Caveats

There are a number of points to consider when interpreting heritability:

Estimates

Various studies have estimated the heritability of IQ to be between 0.7 and 0.8 in adults and 0.45 in childhood in the United States. [15] [12] [39] It has been found that estimates of heritability increase as individuals age. Heritability estimates in infancy are as low as 0.2, around 0.4 in middle childhood, and as high as 0.8 in adulthood. [8] The brain undergoes morphological changes in development which suggests that age-related physical changes could contribute to this effect. [40]

A 1994 article in Behavior Genetics based on a study of Swedish monozygotic and dizygotic twins found the heritability of the sample to be as high as 0.80 in general cognitive ability; however, it also varies by trait, with 0.60 for verbal tests, 0.50 for spatial and speed-of-processing tests, and 0.40 for memory tests. In contrast, studies of other populations estimate an average heritability of 0.50 for general cognitive ability. [12]

In 2006, David Kirp, writing in The New York Times Magazine , summarized a century's worth of research as follows, "about three-quarters of I.Q. differences between individuals are attributable to heredity." [41]

Shared family environment

There are some family effects on the IQ of children, accounting for up to a quarter of the variance. However, adoption studies show that by adulthood adoptive siblings aren't more similar in IQ than strangers, [42] while adult full siblings show an IQ correlation of 0.24. However, some studies of twins reared apart (e.g. Bouchard, 1990) find a significant shared environmental influence, of at least 10% going into late adulthood. [39] Judith Rich Harris suggests that this might be due to biasing assumptions in the methodology of the classical twin and adoption studies. [43]

There are aspects of environments that family members have in common (for example, characteristics of the home). This shared family environment accounts for 0.25-0.35 of the variation in IQ in childhood. By late adolescence it is quite low (zero in some studies). There is a similar effect for several other psychological traits. These studies have not looked into the effects of extreme environments such as in abusive families. [15] [42] [44] [45]

The American Psychological Association's report "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" (1996) asserts the necessity of a certain minimum level of responsible care for normal child development. Environments that are severely deprived, neglectful, or abusive negatively affect various developmental aspects, including intellectual growth. Beyond this minimum threshold, the influence of family experience on child development is contentious. Variables such as home resources and parents' use of language are correlated with children's IQ scores; however, these correlations may be influenced by genetic as well as environmental factors. The extent to which variance in IQ results from differences between families, compared to the varying experiences of different children within the same family, is a subject of debate. Recent twin and adoption studies indicate that the effect of the shared family environment is significant in early childhood but diminishes substantially by late adolescence. These findings suggest that differences in family lifestyles, while potentially important for many aspects of children's lives, have little long-term impact on the skills measured by intelligence tests.

Non-shared family environment and environment outside the family

Although parents treat their children differently, such differential treatment explains only a small amount of non-shared environmental influence. One suggestion is that children react differently to the same environment due to different genes. More likely influences may be the impact of peers and other experiences outside the family. [15] [44] For example, siblings grown up in the same household may have different friends and teachers and even contract different illnesses. This factor may be one of the reasons why IQ score correlations between siblings decreases as they get older. [46]

Malnutrition and diseases

Certain single-gene metabolic disorders can severely affect intelligence. Phenylketonuria is an example, [6] with publications documenting the capacity of treated phenylketonuria to produce a reduction of 10 IQ points on average. [47] Meta-analyses have found that environmental factors, such as iodine deficiency, can result in large reductions in average IQ; iodine deficiency has been shown to produce a reduction of 12.5 IQ points on average. [48]

Heritability and socioeconomic status

The APA report "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" (1996) also stated that:

"We should note, however, that low-income and non-white families are poorly represented in existing adoption studies as well as in most twin samples. Thus it is not yet clear whether these studies apply to the population as a whole. It remains possible that, across the full range of income and ethnicity, between-family differences have more lasting consequences for psychometric intelligence." [15]

A study (1999) by Capron and Duyme of French children adopted between the ages of four and six examined the influence of socioeconomic status (SES). The children's IQs initially averaged 77, putting them near retardation. Most were abused or neglected as infants, then shunted from one foster home or institution to the next. Nine years later after adoption, when they were on average 14 years old, they retook the IQ tests, and all of them did better. The amount they improved was directly related to the adopting family's socioeconomic status. "Children adopted by farmers and laborers had average IQ scores of 85.5; those placed with middle-class families had average scores of 92. The average IQ scores of youngsters placed in well-to-do homes climbed more than 20 points, to 98." [41] [49]

Stoolmiller (1999) argued that the range of environments in previous adoption studies was restricted. Adopting families tend to be more similar on, for example, socio-economic status than the general population, which suggests a possible underestimation of the role of the shared family environment in previous studies. Corrections for range restriction to adoption studies indicated that socio-economic status could account for as much as 50% of the variance in IQ. [50]

On the other hand, the effect of this was examined by Matt McGue and colleagues (2007), who wrote that "restriction in range in parent disinhibitory psychopathology and family socio-economic status had no effect on adoptive-sibling correlations [in] IQ" [51]

Turkheimer and colleagues (2003) argued that the proportions of IQ variance attributable to genes and environment vary with socioeconomic status. They found that in a study on seven-year-old twins, in impoverished families, 60% of the variance in early childhood IQ was accounted for by the shared family environment, and the contribution of genes is close to zero; in affluent families, the result is almost exactly the reverse. [13]

In contrast to Turkheimer (2003), a study by Nagoshi and Johnson (2005) concluded that the heritability of IQ did not vary as a function of parental socioeconomic status in the 949 families of Caucasian and 400 families of Japanese ancestry who took part in the Hawaii Family Study of Cognition. [52]

Asbury and colleagues (2005) studied the effect of environmental risk factors on verbal and non-verbal ability in a nationally representative sample of 4-year-old British twins. There was not any statistically significant interaction for non-verbal ability, but the heritability of verbal ability was found to be higher in low-SES and high-risk environments. [53]

Harden, Turkheimer, and Loehlin (2007) investigated adolescents, most 17 years old, and found that, among higher income families, genetic influences accounted for approximately 55% of the variance in cognitive aptitude and shared environmental influences about 35%. Among lower income families, the proportions were in the reverse direction, 39% genetic and 45% shared environment." [54]

In the course of a substantial review, Rushton and Jensen (2010) criticized the study of Capron and Duyme, arguing their choice of IQ test and selection of child and adolescent subjects were a poor choice because this gives a relatively less hereditable measure. [35] The argument here rests on a strong form of Spearman's hypothesis, that the hereditability of different kinds of IQ test can vary according to how closely they correlate to the general intelligence factor (g); both the empirical data and statistical methodology bearing on this question are matters of active controversy. [55] [56] [57]

A 2011 study by Tucker-Drob and colleagues reported that at age 2, genes accounted for approximately 50% of the variation in mental ability for children being raised in high socioeconomic status families, but genes accounted for negligible variation in mental ability for children being raised in low socioeconomic status families. This gene–environment interaction was not apparent at age 10 months, suggesting that the effect emerges over the course of early development. [58]

A 2012 study based on a representative sample of twins from the United Kingdom, with longitudinal data on IQ from age two to age fourteen, did not find evidence for lower heritability in low-SES families. However, the study indicated that the effects of shared family environment on IQ were generally greater in low-SES families than in high-SES families, resulting in greater variance in IQ in low-SES families. The authors noted that previous research had produced inconsistent results on whether or not SES moderates the heritability of IQ. They suggested three explanations for the inconsistency. First, some studies may have lacked statistical power to detect interactions. Second, the age range investigated has varied between studies. Third, the effect of SES may vary in different demographics and different countries. [59]

A 2017 King's College London study suggests that genes account for nearly 50 per cent of the differences between whether children are socially mobile or not. [60]

Maternal (fetal) environment

A meta-analysis by Devlin and colleagues (1997) of 212 previous studies evaluated an alternative model for environmental influence and found that it fits the data better than the 'family-environments' model commonly used. The shared maternal (fetal) environment effects, often assumed to be negligible, account for 20% of covariance between twins and 5% between siblings, and the effects of genes are correspondingly reduced, with two measures of heritability being less than 50%. They argue that the shared maternal environment may explain the striking correlation between the IQs of twins, especially those of adult twins that were reared apart. [1] IQ heritability increases during early childhood, but whether it stabilizes thereafter remains unclear. [1] [ needs update ] These results have two implications: a new model may be required regarding the influence of genes and environment on cognitive function; and interventions aimed at improving the prenatal environment could lead to a significant boost in the population's IQ. [1]

Bouchard and McGue reviewed the literature in 2003, arguing that Devlin's conclusions about the magnitude of heritability is not substantially different from previous reports and that their conclusions regarding prenatal effects stands in contradiction to many previous reports. [7] They write that:

Chipuer et al. and Loehlin conclude that the postnatal rather than the prenatal environment is most important. The Devlin et al. (1997a) conclusion that the prenatal environment contributes to twin IQ similarity is especially remarkable given the existence of an extensive empirical literature on prenatal effects. Price (1950), in a comprehensive review published over 50 years ago, argued that almost all MZ twin prenatal effects produced differences rather than similarities. As of 1950 the literature on the topic was so large that the entire bibliography was not published. It was finally published in 1978 with an additional 260 references. At that time Price reiterated his earlier conclusion (Price, 1978). Research subsequent to the 1978 review largely reinforces Price's hypothesis (Bryan, 1993; Macdonald et al., 1993; Hall and Lopez-Rangel, 1996; see also Martin et al., 1997, box 2; Machin, 1996). [7]

Dickens and Flynn model

Dickens and Flynn (2001) argued that the "heritability" figure includes both a direct effect of the genotype on IQ and also indirect effects where the genotype changes the environment, in turn affecting IQ. That is, those with a higher IQ tend to seek out stimulating environments that further increase IQ. The direct effect can initially have been very small but feedback loops can create large differences in IQ. In their model an environmental stimulus can have a very large effect on IQ, even in adults, but this effect also decays over time unless the stimulus continues. [61] This model could be adapted to include possible factors, like nutrition in early childhood, that may cause permanent effects.

The Flynn effect is the increase in average intelligence test scores by about 0.3% annually, resulting in the average person today scoring 15 points higher in IQ compared to the generation 50 years ago. [62] This effect can be explained by a generally more stimulating environment for all people. The authors suggest that programs aiming to increase IQ would be most likely to produce long-term IQ gains if they taught children how to replicate outside the program the kinds of cognitively demanding experiences that produce IQ gains while they are in the program and motivate them to persist in that replication long after they have left the program. [61] [63] Most of the improvements have allowed for better abstract reasoning, spatial relations, and comprehension. Some scientists have suggested that such enhancements are due to better nutrition, better parenting and schooling, as well as exclusion of the least intelligent people from reproduction. However, Flynn and a group of other scientists share the viewpoint that modern life implies solving many abstract problems which leads to a rise in their IQ scores. [62]

Influence of genes on IQ stability

Recent research has illuminated genetic factors underlying IQ stability and change. Genome-wide association studies have demonstrated that the genes involved in intelligence remain fairly stable over time. [64] Specifically, in terms of IQ stability, "genetic factors mediated phenotypic stability throughout this entire period [age 0 to 16], whereas most age-to-age instability appeared to be due to non-shared environmental influences". [65] [66] These findings have been replicated extensively and observed in the United Kingdom, [67] the United States, [68] [65] and the Netherlands. [69] [70] [71] [72] Additionally, researchers have shown that naturalistic changes in IQ occur in individuals at variable times. [73]

Influence of parents genes that are not inherited

Kong [74] reports that, "Nurture has a genetic component, i.e. alleles in the parents affect the parents' phenotypes and through that influence the outcomes of the child." These results were obtained through a meta-analysis of educational attainment and polygenic scores of non-transmitted alleles. Although the study deals with educational attainment and not IQ, these two are strongly linked. [75]

Spatial ability component of IQ

Spatial ability has been shown to be unifactorial (a single score accounts well for all spatial abilities), and is 69% heritable in a sample of 1,367 pairs of twins from the ages 19 through 21. [76] Further only 8% of spatial ability can be accounted for by shared environmental factors like school and family. [76] Of the genetically determined portion of spatial ability, 24% is shared with verbal ability (general intelligence) and 43% was specific to spatial ability alone. [76]

Molecular genetic investigations

A 2009 review article identified over 50 genetic polymorphisms that have been reported to be associated with cognitive ability in various studies, but noted that the discovery of small effect sizes and lack of replication have characterized this research so far. [77] Another study attempted to replicate 12 reported associations between specific genetic variants and general cognitive ability in three large datasets, but found that only one of the genotypes was significantly associated with general intelligence in one of the samples, a result expected by chance alone. The authors concluded that most reported genetic associations with general intelligence are probably false positives brought about by inadequate sample sizes. [78] Arguing that common genetic variants explain much of the variation in general intelligence, they suggested that the effects of individual variants are so small that very large samples are required to reliably detect them. [78] Genetic diversity within individuals is heavily correlated with IQ. [79]

A novel molecular genetic method for estimating heritability calculates the overall genetic similarity (as indexed by the cumulative effects of all genotyped single nucleotide polymorphisms) between all pairs of individuals in a sample of unrelated individuals and then correlates this genetic similarity with phenotypic similarity across all the pairs. A study using this method estimated that the lower bounds for the narrow-sense heritability of crystallized and fluid intelligence are 40% and 51%, respectively. A replication study in an independent sample confirmed these results, reporting a heritability estimate of 47%. [4] These findings are compatible with the view that a large number of genes, each with only a small effect, contribute to differences in intelligence. [78]

Correlations between IQ and degree of genetic relatedness

The relative influence of genetics and environment for a trait can be calculated by measuring how strongly traits covary in people of a given genetic (unrelated, siblings, fraternal twins, or identical twins) and environmental (reared in the same family or not) relationship. One method is to consider identical twins reared apart, with any similarities that exist between such twin pairs attributed to genotype. In terms of correlation statistics, this means that theoretically the correlation of tests scores between monozygotic twins would be 1.00 if genetics alone accounted for variation in IQ scores; likewise, siblings and dizygotic twins share on average half alleles and the correlation of their scores would be 0.50 if IQ were affected by genes alone (or greater if there is a positive correlation between the IQs of spouses in the parental generation). Practically, however, the upper bound of these correlations are given by the reliability of the test, which is 0.90 to 0.95 for typical IQ tests. [80]

If there is biological inheritance of IQ, then the relatives of a person with a high IQ should exhibit a comparably high IQ with a much higher probability than the general population. In 1982, Bouchard and McGue reviewed such correlations reported in 111 original studies in the United States. The mean correlation of IQ scores between monozygotic twins was 0.86, between siblings 0.47, between half-siblings 0.31, and between cousins 0.15. [81]

The 2006 edition of Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence by Alan S. Kaufman and Elizabeth O. Lichtenberger reports correlations of 0.86 for identical twins raised together compared to 0.76 for those raised apart and 0.47 for siblings. [82] These numbers are not necessarily static. When comparing pre-1963 to late 1970s data, researchers DeFries and Plomin found that the IQ correlation between parent and child living together fell significantly, from 0.50 to 0.35. The opposite occurred for fraternal twins. [83]

Every one of these studies presented next contains estimates of only two of the three factors which are relevant. The three factors are G, E, and GxE. Since there is no possibility of studying equal environments in a manner comparable to using identical twins for equal genetics, the GxE factor can not be isolated. Thus the estimates are actually of G+GxE and E. Although this may seem like nonsense, it is justified by the unstated assumption that GxE=0. It is also the case that the values shown below are r correlations and not r(squared), proportions of variance. Numbers less than one are smaller when squared. The next to last number in the list below refers to less than 5% shared variance between a parent and child living apart.

Another summary:

Between-group heritability

In the US, individuals identifying themselves as Asian generally tend to score higher on IQ tests than Caucasians, who tend to score higher than Hispanics, who tend to score higher than African Americans. [87] Yet, although IQ differences between individuals have been shown to have a large hereditary component, it does not follow that between-group differences in average IQ have a genetic basis. [19] [20] [26] In fact, greater variation in IQ scores exists within each ethnic group than between them. [87] The scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain average differences in IQ test performance between racial groups. [22] [24] [25] [26] [27] Growing evidence indicates that environmental factors, not genetic ones, explain the racial IQ gap. [26] [27] [88]

Arguments in support of a genetic explanation of racial differences in average IQ are sometimes fallacious. For instance, some hereditarians have cited as evidence the failure of known environmental factors to account for such differences, or the high heritability of intelligence within races. [19] Jensen and Rushton, in their formulation of Spearman's Hypothesis, argued that cognitive tasks that have the highest g-load are the tasks in which the gap between black and white test takers is greatest, and that this supports their view that racial IQ gaps are in large part genetic. [89] However, in separate reviews, Mackintosh, Nisbett et al. and Flynn have all concluded that the slight correlation between g-loading and the test score gap offers no clue to the cause of the gap. [90] [91] [92] Further reviews of both adoption studies and racial admixture studies have also found no evidence for a genetic component behind group-level IQ differences. [93] [94] [95] [96] Hereditarian arguments for racial differences in IQ have been criticized from a theoretical point of view as well. For example, the geneticist and neuroscientist Kevin Mitchell has argued that "systematic genetic differences in intelligence between large, ancient populations" are "inherently and deeply implausible" because the "constant churn of genetic variation works against any long-term rise or fall in intelligence." [21] As he argues, "To end up with systematic genetic differences in intelligence between large, ancient populations, the selective forces driving those differences would need to have been enormous. What's more, those forces would have to have acted across entire continents, with wildly different environments, and have been persistent over tens of thousands of years of tremendous cultural change." [21]

In favor of an environmental explanation, on the other hand, numerous studies and reviews have shown promising results. Among these, some focus on the gradual closing of the black–white IQ gap over the last decades of the 20th century, as black test-takers increased their average scores relative to white test-takers. For instance, Vincent reported in 1991 that the black–white IQ gap was decreasing among children, but that it was remaining constant among adults. [97] Similarly, a 2006 study by Dickens and Flynn estimated that the difference between mean scores of black people and white people closed by about 5 or 6 IQ points between 1972 and 2002, a reduction of about one-third. [98] In the same period, the educational achievement disparity also diminished. [99] Reviews by Flynn and Dickens, Mackintosh, and Nisbett et al. all accept the gradual closing of the gap as a fact. [98] [100] [101] Other recent studies have focused on disparities in nutrition and prenatal care, as well as other health-related environmental disparities, and have found that these disparities may account for significant IQ gaps between population groups. [102] [103] [104] [105] Still other studies have focused on educational disparities, and have found that intensive early childhood education and test preparation can diminish or eliminate the black–white IQ test gap. [106] [107] [108] [109] In light of these and similar findings, a consensus has formed that genetics does not explain differences in average IQ test performance between racial groups. [22] [26]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intelligence quotient</span> Score from a test designed to assess intelligence

An intelligence quotient (IQ) is a total score derived from a set of standardized tests or subtests designed to assess human intelligence. Originally, IQ was a score obtained by dividing a person's mental age score, obtained by administering an intelligence test, by the person's chronological age, both expressed in terms of years and months. The resulting fraction (quotient) was multiplied by 100 to obtain the IQ score. For modern IQ tests, the raw score is transformed to a normal distribution with mean 100 and standard deviation 15. This results in approximately two-thirds of the population scoring between IQ 85 and IQ 115 and about 2 percent each above 130 and below 70.

Discussions of race and intelligence – specifically regarding claims of differences in intelligence along racial lines – have appeared in both popular science and academic research since the modern concept of race was first introduced. With the inception of IQ testing in the early 20th century, differences in average test performance between racial groups have been observed, though these differences have fluctuated and in many cases steadily decreased over time. Complicating the issue, modern science has concluded that race is a socially constructed phenomenon rather than a biological reality, and there exist various conflicting definitions of intelligence. In particular, the validity of IQ testing as a metric for human intelligence is disputed. Today, the scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain differences in IQ test performance between groups, and that observed differences are environmental in origin.

<i>The Bell Curve</i> 1994 book by Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray

The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life is a 1994 book by the psychologist Richard J. Herrnstein and the political scientist Charles Murray in which the authors argue that human intelligence is substantially influenced by both inherited and environmental factors and that it is a better predictor of many personal outcomes, including financial income, job performance, birth out of wedlock, and involvement in crime than are an individual's parental socioeconomic status. They also argue that those with high intelligence, the "cognitive elite", are becoming separated from those of average and below-average intelligence, and that this separation is a source of social division within the United States.

Nature versus nurture is a long-standing debate in biology and society about the relative influence on human beings of their genetic inheritance (nature) and the environmental conditions of their development (nurture). The alliterative expression "nature and nurture" in English has been in use since at least the Elizabethan period and goes back to medieval French. The complementary combination of the two concepts is an ancient concept. Nature is what people think of as pre-wiring and is influenced by genetic inheritance and other biological factors. Nurture is generally taken as the influence of external factors after conception e.g. the product of exposure, experience and learning on an individual.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heritability</span> Estimation of effect of genetic variation on phenotypic variation of a trait

Heritability is a statistic used in the fields of breeding and genetics that estimates the degree of variation in a phenotypic trait in a population that is due to genetic variation between individuals in that population. The concept of heritability can be expressed in the form of the following question: "What is the proportion of the variation in a given trait within a population that is not explained by the environment or random chance?"

Twin studies are studies conducted on identical or fraternal twins. They aim to reveal the importance of environmental and genetic influences for traits, phenotypes, and disorders. Twin research is considered a key tool in behavioral genetics and in related fields, from biology to psychology. Twin studies are part of the broader methodology used in behavior genetics, which uses all data that are genetically informative – siblings studies, adoption studies, pedigree, etc. These studies have been used to track traits ranging from personal behavior to the presentation of severe mental illnesses such as schizophrenia.

The g factor is a construct developed in psychometric investigations of cognitive abilities and human intelligence. It is a variable that summarizes positive correlations among different cognitive tasks, reflecting the assertion that an individual's performance on one type of cognitive task tends to be comparable to that person's performance on other kinds of cognitive tasks. The g factor typically accounts for 40 to 50 percent of the between-individual performance differences on a given cognitive test, and composite scores based on many tests are frequently regarded as estimates of individuals' standing on the g factor. The terms IQ, general intelligence, general cognitive ability, general mental ability, and simply intelligence are often used interchangeably to refer to this common core shared by cognitive tests. However, the g factor itself is a mathematical construct indicating the level of observed correlation between cognitive tasks. The measured value of this construct depends on the cognitive tasks that are used, and little is known about the underlying causes of the observed correlations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human behaviour genetics</span> Field that examines the role of genetic and environmental influences on human behaviour

Human behaviour genetics is an interdisciplinary subfield of behaviour genetics that studies the role of genetic and environmental influences on human behaviour. Classically, human behavioural geneticists have studied the inheritance of behavioural traits. The field was originally focused on determining the importance of genetic influences on human behaviour. It has evolved to address more complex questions such as: how important are genetic and/or environmental influences on various human behavioural traits; to what extent do the same genetic and/or environmental influences impact the overlap between human behavioural traits; how do genetic and/or environmental influences on behaviour change across development; and what environmental factors moderate the importance of genetic effects on human behaviour. The field is interdisciplinary, and draws from genetics, psychology, and statistics. Most recently, the field has moved into the area of statistical genetics, with many behavioural geneticists also involved in efforts to identify the specific genes involved in human behaviour, and to understand how the effects associated with these genes changes across time, and in conjunction with the environment.

Spearman's hypothesis has two formulations. The original formulation was that the magnitudes of the black-white differences on tests of cognitive ability positively correlate with the tests' g-loading. The subsequent formulation was that the magnitude of the black-white difference on tests of cognitive ability is entirely or mainly a function of the extent to which a test measures general mental ability, or g.

Hereditarianism is the research program according to which heredity plays a central role in determining human nature and character traits, such as intelligence and personality. Hereditarians believe in the power of genetic influences to explain human behavior and [[eugenics|solve human social-political problems.]] They stress the value of evolutionary explanations in all areas of the human sciences.

Personality development encompasses the dynamic construction and deconstruction of integrative characteristics that distinguish an individual in terms of interpersonal behavioral traits. Personality development is ever-changing and subject to contextual factors and life-altering experiences. Personality development is also dimensional in description and subjective in nature. That is, personality development can be seen as a continuum varying in degrees of intensity and change. It is subjective in nature because its conceptualization is rooted in social norms of expected behavior, self-expression, and personal growth. The dominant viewpoint in personality psychology indicates that personality emerges early and continues to develop across one's lifespan. Adult personality traits are believed to have a basis in infant temperament, meaning that individual differences in disposition and behavior appear early in life, potentially before language of conscious self-representation develop. The Five Factor Model of personality maps onto the dimensions of childhood temperament. This suggests that individual differences in levels of the corresponding personality traits are present from young ages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mainstream Science on Intelligence</span> 1994 public statement published in the Wall Street Journal

"Mainstream Science on Intelligence" was a public statement issued by a group of researchers led by psychologist Linda Gottfredson. It was published originally in The Wall Street Journal on December 13, 1994, as a response to criticism of the book The Bell Curve by Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray, which appeared earlier the same year. The statement defended Herrnstein and Murray's controversial claims about race and intelligence, including the claim that average intelligence quotient (IQ) differences between racial and ethnic groups may be at least partly genetic in origin. This view is now considered discredited by mainstream science.

The study of height and intelligence examines correlations between human height and human intelligence. Some epidemiological research on the subject has shown that there is a small but statistically significant positive correlation between height and intelligence after controlling for socioeconomic class and parental education. The cited study, however, does not draw any conclusions about height and intelligence, but rather suggests "a continuing effect of post-natal growth on childhood cognition beyond the age of 9 years." This correlation arises in both the developed and developing world and persists across age groups. An individual's taller stature has been attributed to higher economic status, which often translates to a higher quality of nutrition. This correlation, however, can be inverted to characterize one's socioeconomic status as a consequence of stature, where shorter stature can attract discrimination that affects many factors, among them employment, and treatment by educators. One such theory argues that since height strongly correlates with white and gray matter volume, it may act as a biomarker for cerebral development which itself mediates intelligence. Competing explanations include that certain genetic factors may influence both height and intelligence, or that both height and intelligence may be affected in similar ways by adverse environmental exposures during development. Measurements of the total surface area and mean thickness of the cortical grey matter using a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed that the height of individuals had a positive correlation with the total cortical surface area. This supports the idea that genes that influence height also influence total surface area of the brain, which in turn influences intelligence, resulting in the correlation. Other explanations further qualify the positive correlation between height and intelligence, suggesting that because the correlation becomes weaker with higher socioeconomic class and education level, environmental factors could partially override any genetic factors affecting both characteristics.

Gene–environment correlation is said to occur when exposure to environmental conditions depends on an individual's genotype.

In multivariate quantitative genetics, a genetic correlation is the proportion of variance that two traits share due to genetic causes, the correlation between the genetic influences on a trait and the genetic influences on a different trait estimating the degree of pleiotropy or causal overlap. A genetic correlation of 0 implies that the genetic effects on one trait are independent of the other, while a correlation of 1 implies that all of the genetic influences on the two traits are identical. The bivariate genetic correlation can be generalized to inferring genetic latent variable factors across > 2 traits using factor analysis. Genetic correlation models were introduced into behavioral genetics in the 1970s–1980s.

Behavioural genetics, also referred to as behaviour genetics, is a field of scientific research that uses genetic methods to investigate the nature and origins of individual differences in behaviour. While the name "behavioural genetics" connotes a focus on genetic influences, the field broadly investigates the extent to which genetic and environmental factors influence individual differences, and the development of research designs that can remove the confounding of genes and environment. Behavioural genetics was founded as a scientific discipline by Francis Galton in the late 19th century, only to be discredited through association with eugenics movements before and during World War II. In the latter half of the 20th century, the field saw renewed prominence with research on inheritance of behaviour and mental illness in humans, as well as research on genetically informative model organisms through selective breeding and crosses. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, technological advances in molecular genetics made it possible to measure and modify the genome directly. This led to major advances in model organism research and in human studies, leading to new scientific discoveries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eric Turkheimer</span> Researcher

Eric Nathan Turkheimer is an American psychologist and the Hugh Scott Hamilton Professor of psychology at the University of Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Family resemblance (anthropology)</span> Physical and psychological similarities shared between close relatives

Family resemblance refers to physical similarities shared between close relatives, especially between parents and children and between siblings. In psychology, the similarities of personality are also observed.

Wendy Johnson is an American differential psychologist and professor of psychology at the University of Edinburgh. She holds the chair in Differential Development in the Department of Psychology and Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology at the University of Edinburgh.

In behavioral genetics, the Scarr–Rowe effect, also known as the Scarr–Rowe hypothesis, refers to the proposed moderating effect of low socioeconomic status on the heritability of children's IQ. According to this hypothesis, lower socioeconomic status and greater exposure to social disadvantage during childhood leads to a decrease in the heritability of IQ, as compared to children raised in more advantaged environments. It is considered an example of gene–environment interaction. This hypothesized effect was first proposed by Sandra Scarr, who found support for it in a 1971 study of twins in Philadelphia, and these results were replicated by David C. Rowe in 1999. Since then, similar results have been replicated numerous times, though not all replication studies have yielded positive results. A 2015 meta-analysis found that the effect was predominant in the United States while less evident in societies with robust child welfare systems.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Devlin, B.; Daniels, Michael; Roeder, Kathryn (1997). "The heritability of IQ". Nature. 388 (6641): 468–71. Bibcode:1997Natur.388..468D. doi: 10.1038/41319 . PMID   9242404. S2CID   4313884.
  2. ↑ Rose, Steven P R (June 2006). "Commentary: Heritability estimates—long past their sell-by date". International Journal of Epidemiology. 35 (3): 525–527. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl064 . PMID   16645027.
  3. ↑ Alice Marcus. 2010. Human Genetics: An Overview. Alpha Science section 14.5
  4. 1 2 Davies, G.; Tenesa, A.; Payton, A.; Yang, J.; Harris, S. E.; Liewald, D.; Deary, I. J. (2011). "Genome-wide association studies establish that human intelligence is highly heritable and polygenic". Molecular Psychiatry. 16 (10): 996–1005. doi:10.1038/mp.2011.85. PMC   3182557 . PMID   21826061.
  5. ↑ Association, New Scientist staff and Press. "Found: more than 500 genes that are linked to intelligence". New Scientist. Archived from the original on 2019-12-13. Retrieved 2018-11-29.
  6. 1 2 Robert J. Sternberg; Elena Grigorenko (2002). The general factor of intelligence . Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp.  260–261. ISBN   978-0-8058-3675-2.[ page needed ]
  7. 1 2 3 Bouchard, Thomas J.; McGue, Matt (January 2003). "Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences". Journal of Neurobiology. 54 (1): 4–45. doi: 10.1002/neu.10160 . PMID   12486697.
  8. 1 2 Bouchard, Thomas J. (7 August 2013). "The Wilson Effect: The Increase in Heritability of IQ With Age". Twin Research and Human Genetics. 16 (5): 923–930. doi: 10.1017/thg.2013.54 . PMID   23919982. S2CID   13747480.
  9. ↑ Icenogle, G.; Steinberg, L.; Duell, N.; Chein, J.; Chang, L.; Chaudhary, N.; Di Giunta, L.; Dodge, K. A.; Fanti, K. A.; Lansford, J. E.; Oburu, P.; Pastorelli, C.; Skinner, A. T.; Sorbring, E.; Tapanya, S.; Tirado, L. M.; Alampay, L. P.; Al-Hassan, S. M.; Takash, H. M.; Bacchini, D. (2019). "Adolescents' Cognitive Capacity Reaches Adult Levels Prior to Their Psychosocial Maturity: Evidence for a "Maturity Gap" in a Multinational, Cross-Sectional Sample". Law and Human Behavior. 43 (1): 69–85. doi:10.1037/lhb0000315. PMC   6551607 . PMID   30762417.
  10. ↑ Lutter, C. K.; Lutter, R. (2012). "Fetal and Early Childhood Undernutrition, Mortality, and Lifelong Health". Science. 337 (6101): 1495–1499. Bibcode:2012Sci...337.1495L. doi:10.1126/science.1224616. hdl: 1903/24471 . PMID   22997328. S2CID   45170027.
  11. ↑ Daniele, V. (2013). "The burden of disease and the IQ of nations". Learning and Individual Differences. 28: 109–118. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.015.
  12. 1 2 3 Plomin, R.; Pedersen, N. L.; Lichtenstein, P.; McClearn, G. E. (1994). "Variability and stability in cognitive abilities are largely genetic later in life". Behavior Genetics. 24 (3): 207–15. doi:10.1007/BF01067188. PMID   7945151. S2CID   6503298.
  13. 1 2 Turkheimer, Eric; Haley, Andreana; Waldron, Mary; d'Onofrio, Brian; Gottesman, Irving I. (2003). "Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of iq in young children". Psychological Science. 14 (6): 623–8. doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1475.x. PMID   14629696. S2CID   11265284.
  14. ↑ Devlin, B; Daniels, M; Roeder, K (1997). "The heritability of IQ". Nature. 388 (6641): 468–71. Bibcode:1997Natur.388..468D. doi:10.1038/41319. PMID   9242404.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Neisser, Ulric; Boodoo, Gwyneth; Bouchard, Thomas J. Jr.; Boykin, A. Wade; Brody, Nathan; Ceci, Stephen J.; Halpern, Diane F.; Loehlin, John C.; et al. (1996). "Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns". American Psychologist. 51 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77.
  16. ↑ Bouchard, TJ (2004). "Genetic influence on human psychological traits - A survey". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 13 (4): 148–151. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00295.x.
  17. ↑ Plomin, Robert; DeFries, John C.; Knopik, Valerie S.; Neiderhiser, Jenae M. (24 September 2012). Behavioral Genetics. Worth Publishers. pp. 195–196. ISBN   978-1-4292-4215-8 . Retrieved 4 September 2013. Model-fitting analyses that simultaneously analyze all the family, adoption, and twin data summarized in Figure 12.6 yield heritability estimates of about 50 percent (Chipuer, Rovine & Plomin, 1990; Loehlin, 1989).
  18. ↑ Visscher, Peter M.; Hill, William G.; Wray, Naomi R. (2008). "Heritability in the genomics era – concepts and misconceptions". Nature Reviews Genetics. 9 (4): 255–266. doi:10.1038/nrg2322. PMID   18319743. S2CID   690431.
  19. 1 2 3 Mackenzie, Brian (1984). "Explaining race differences in IQ: The logic, the methodology, and the evidence". American Psychologist. 39 (11): 1214–1233. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.11.1214. Archived from the original on 2021-02-02. Retrieved 2021-01-29.
  20. 1 2 Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (2012). "Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments". American Psychologist. 67 (2): 130–159. doi:10.1037/a0026699. ISSN   1935-990X. PMID   22233090.
  21. 1 2 3 Mitchell, Kevin (2 May 2018). "Why genetic IQ differences between 'races' are unlikely: The idea that intelligence can differ between populations has made headlines again, but the rules of evolution make it implausible". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 29 June 2020. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  22. 1 2 3 Ceci, Stephen; Williams, Wendy M. (1 February 2009). "Should scientists study race and IQ? YES: The scientific truth must be pursued". Nature. 457 (7231): 788–789. Bibcode:2009Natur.457..788C. doi: 10.1038/457788a . PMID   19212385. S2CID   205044224. There is an emerging consensus about racial and gender equality in genetic determinants of intelligence; most researchers, including ourselves, agree that genes do not explain between-group differences.
  23. ↑ Panofsky, Aaron; Dasgupta, Kushan; Iturriaga, Nicole (28 September 2020). "How White nationalists mobilize genetics: From genetic ancestry and human biodiversity to counterscience and metapolitics". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 175 (2): 387–398. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24150 . PMC   9909835 . PMID   32986847. [T]he claims that genetics defines racial groups and makes them different, that IQ and cultural differences among racial groups are caused by genes, and that racial inequalities within and between nations are the inevitable outcome of long evolutionary processes are neither new nor supported by science (either old or new).
  24. 1 2 Hunt, Earl (2010). Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press. p. 447. ISBN   978-0-521-70781-7. OL   24384631M – via Open Library. [N]o genes related to the difference in cognitive skills across the various racial and ethic groups have ever been discovered.
  25. 1 2 Mackintosh, N. J. (2011). IQ and human intelligence (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 334–338, 344. ISBN   978-0-19-958559-5. OCLC   669754008. OL   25211083M – via Open Library.
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (2012). "Group differences in IQ are best understood as environmental in origin" (PDF). American Psychologist. 67 (6): 503–504. doi:10.1037/a0029772. ISSN   0003-066X. PMID   22963427. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 January 2015. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
  27. 1 2 3 Kaplan, Jonathan Michael (January 2015). "Race, IQ, and the search for statistical signals associated with so-called "X"-factors: environments, racism, and the "hereditarian hypothesis"". Biology & Philosophy. 30 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10539-014-9428-0. ISSN   0169-3867. S2CID   85351431.
  28. ↑ Wray N, Visscher P (2008). "Estimating Trait Heritability". Nature Education. 1 (1): 29. Archived from the original on 2 August 2015. Retrieved 24 July 2015.
  29. ↑ Gazzaniga MS, Heatherton TF, Halpern DF (February 2015). Psychological science (5th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton. ISBN   978-0-393-26313-8. OCLC   908409996.
  30. ↑ Visscher, Peter M.; Medland, Sarah E.; Ferreira, Manuel A. R.; Morley, Katherine I.; Zhu, Gu; Cornes, Belinda K.; Montgomery, Grant W.; Martin, Nicholas G. (2006). "Assumption-Free Estimation of Heritability from Genome-Wide Identity-by-Descent Sharing between Full Siblings". PLOS Genetics. 2 (3): e41. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020041 . PMC   1413498 . PMID   16565746.
  31. ↑ Kendler, K. S.; Gatz, M; Gardner, CO; Pedersen, NL (2006). "A Swedish National Twin Study of Lifetime Major Depression". American Journal of Psychiatry. 163 (1): 109–14. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.109. PMID   16390897. S2CID   25398383.
  32. ↑ Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne; Klebanov, Pamela K.; Duncan, Greg J. (1996). "Ethnic Differences in Children's Intelligence Test Scores: Role of Economic Deprivation, Home Environment, and Maternal Characteristics". Child Development. 67 (2): 396–408. doi:10.2307/1131822. JSTOR   1131822. PMID   8625720.
  33. ↑ Johnson, Wendy; Turkheimer, Eric; Gottesman, Irving I.; Bouchard Jr., Thomas J. (2009). "Beyond Heritability: Twin Studies in Behavioral Research". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 18 (4): 217–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01639.x. PMC   2899491 . PMID   20625474.
  34. ↑ Haworth, Claire; Davis, Oliver (2014). "From observational to dynamic genetics". Frontiers in Genetics. 5: 6. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00006 . ISSN   1664-8021. PMC   3896969 . PMID   24478793.
  35. 1 2 Rushton, J. Philippe; Jensen, Arthur R. (2010). "Race and IQ: A Theory-Based Review of the Research in Richard Nisbett's Intelligence and How to Get It". The Open Psychology Journal. 3: 9–35. doi: 10.2174/1874350101003010009 .
  36. ↑ Strachan, Tom; Read, Andrew (2011). Human Molecular Genetics, Fourth Edition . New York: Garland Science. pp.  80–81. ISBN   978-0-8153-4149-9.
  37. ↑ Humphreys, Lloyd G. (1978). "To understand regression from parent to offspring, think statistically". Psychological Bulletin. 85 (6): 1317–1322. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.6.1317. PMID   734015.
  38. ↑ Schacter, Daniel, Daniel Gilbert, and Daniel Wegner. "Intelligence." Psychology. 2 ed. New York: Worth Publishers, 2010. 405-406. Print.
  39. 1 2 Bouchard, Thomas J.; Lykken, David T.; McGue, Matthew; Segal, Nancy L.; Tellegen, Auke (1990). "Sources of Human Psychological Differences: The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart". Science. 250 (4978): 223–8. Bibcode:1990Sci...250..223B. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.225.1769 . doi:10.1126/science.2218526. PMID   2218526.
  40. ↑ Deary, Ian J.; Johnson, W.; Houlihan, L. M. (18 March 2009). "Genetic foundations of human intelligence" (PDF). Human Genetics. 126 (1): 215–232. doi:10.1007/s00439-009-0655-4. hdl: 20.500.11820/c3e0a75b-dad6-4860-91c6-b242221af681 . PMID   19294424. S2CID   4975607. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 16 April 2020.
  41. 1 2 Kirp, David L. (July 23, 2006). "After the Bell Curve". New York Times Magazine . Archived from the original on December 31, 2019. Retrieved August 6, 2006.
  42. 1 2 Bouchard Jr, TJ (1998). "Genetic and environmental influences on adult intelligence and special mental abilities". Human Biology. 70 (2): 257–79. PMID   9549239.
  43. ↑ Harris, Judith Rich (2006). No Two Alike . W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN   9780393059489.[ page needed ]
  44. 1 2 Plomin, R; Asbury, K; Dunn, J (2001). "Why are children in the same family so different? Nonshared environment a decade later". Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 46 (3): 225–33. doi: 10.1177/070674370104600302 . PMID   11320676.
  45. ↑ Harris, Judith Rich (1998). The Nurture Assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: Free Press. ISBN   978-0-6848-4409-1.
  46. ↑ Schacter, Daniel; Gilbert, Daniel; Wegner, Daniel (2010). Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Worth Publishers. p.  408. ISBN   978-1-4292-3719-2.
  47. ↑ Griffiths PV (2000). "Wechsler subscale IQ and subtest profile in early treated phenylketonuria". Arch Dis Child. 82 (3): 209–215. doi:10.1136/adc.82.3.209. PMC   1718264 . PMID   10685922.
  48. ↑ Qian M, Wang D, Watkins WE, Gebski V, Yan YQ, Li M, et al. (2005). "The effects of iodine on intelligence in children: a meta-analysis of studies conducted in China". Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 14 (1): 32–42. PMID   15734706.
  49. ↑ Duyme, Michel; Dumaret, Annick-Camille; Tomkiewicz, Stanislaw (1999). "How can we boost IQs of 'dull children'?: A late adoption study". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 96 (15): 8790–4. Bibcode:1999PNAS...96.8790D. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8790 . JSTOR   48565. PMC   17595 . PMID   10411954.
  50. ↑ Stoolmiller, Mike (1999). "Implications of the restricted range of family environments for estimates of heritability and nonshared environment in behavior-genetic adoption studies". Psychological Bulletin. 125 (4): 392–409. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.4.392. PMID   10414224.
  51. ↑ McGue, Matt; Keyes, Margaret; Sharma, Anu; Elkins, Irene; Legrand, Lisa; Johnson, Wendy; Iacono, William G. (2007). "The Environments of Adopted and Non-adopted Youth: Evidence on Range Restriction From the Sibling Interaction and Behavior Study (SIBS)". Behavior Genetics. 37 (3): l449–462. doi:10.1007/s10519-007-9142-7. PMID   17279339. S2CID   15575737.
  52. ↑ Nagoshi, Craig T.; Johnson, Ronald C. (2004). "Socioeconomic Status Does Not Moderate the Familiality of Cognitive Abilities in the Hawaii Family Study of Cognition". Journal of Biosocial Science. 37 (6): 773–81. doi:10.1017/S0021932004007023. PMID   16221325. S2CID   608104.
  53. ↑ Asbury, K; Wachs, T; Plomin, R (2005). "Environmental moderators of genetic influence on verbal and nonverbal abilities in early childhood". Intelligence. 33 (6): 643–61. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.03.008.
  54. ↑ Harden, K. Paige; Turkheimer, Eric; Loehlin, John C. (2006). "Genotype by Environment Interaction in Adolescents' Cognitive Aptitude". Behavior Genetics. 37 (2): 273–83. doi:10.1007/s10519-006-9113-4. PMC   2903846 . PMID   16977503.
  55. ↑ Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2005). Problems with the method of correlated vectors. Intelligence, 33(4), 431–444.
  56. ↑ Dickens, William T.; Flynn, James R. (2006). "Black Americans Reduce the Racial IQ Gap: Evidence from Standardization Samples" (PDF). Psychological Science. 17 (10): 913–920. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01802.x. PMID   17100793. S2CID   6593169. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-11-05. Retrieved 2020-06-24.
  57. ↑ Flynn, J. R. (2010). The spectacles through which I see the race and IQ debate. Intelligence, 38(4), 363–366.
  58. ↑ Tucker-Drob, E. M.; Rhemtulla, M.; Harden, K. P.; Turkheimer, E.; Fask, D. (2010). "Emergence of a Gene x Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Infant Mental Ability Between 10 Months and 2 Years". Psychological Science. 22 (1): 125–33. doi:10.1177/0956797610392926. PMC   3532898 . PMID   21169524.
  59. ↑ Hanscombe, Ken B.; Trzaskowski, Maciej; Haworth, Claire M. A.; Davis, Oliver S. P.; Dale, Philip S.; Plomin, Robert (2012). Scott, James G (ed.). "Socioeconomic Status (SES) and Children's Intelligence (IQ): In a UK-Representative Sample SES Moderates the Environmental, Not Genetic, Effect on IQ". PLOS ONE. 7 (2): e30320. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...730320H. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030320 . PMC   3270016 . PMID   22312423.
  60. ↑ Ayorech, Ziada (July 17, 2017). "Genetic Influence on Intergenerational Educational Attainment". Psychological Science. 28 (9): 1302–1310. doi:10.1177/0956797617707270. PMC   5595239 . PMID   28715641.
  61. 1 2 Dickens, William T.; Flynn, James R. (2001). "Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox resolved". Psychological Review. 108 (2): 346–69. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.139.2436 . doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.346. PMID   11381833.
  62. 1 2 Schacter, Daniel; Gilbert, Daniel; Wegner, Daniel (2010). Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Worth Publishers. pp.  409–10. ISBN   978-1-4292-3719-2.
  63. ↑ Dickens, William T.; Flynn, James R. (2002). "The IQ paradox is still resolved: Reply to Loehlin (2002) and Rowe and Rodgers (2002)". Psychological Review. 109 (4): 764–771. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.764.
  64. ↑ Trzaskowski, M; Yang, J; Visscher, P M; Plomin, R (2013). "DNA evidence for strong genetic stability and increasing heritability of intelligence from age 7 to 12". Molecular Psychiatry. 19 (3): 380–384. doi:10.1038/mp.2012.191. PMC   3932402 . PMID   23358157.
  65. 1 2 Petrill, Stephen A.; Lipton, Paul A.; Hewitt, John K.; Plomin, Robert; Cherny, Stacey S.; Corley, Robin; Defries, John C. (2004). "Genetic and Environmental Contributions to General Cognitive Ability Through the First 16 Years of Life". Developmental Psychology. 40 (5): 805–12. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.805. PMC   3710702 . PMID   15355167.
  66. ↑ Lyons, Michael J.; York, Timothy P.; Franz, Carol E.; Grant, Michael D.; Eaves, Lindon J.; Jacobson, Kristen C.; Schaie, K. Warner; Panizzon, Matthew S.; et al. (2009). "Genes Determine Stability and the Environment Determines Change in Cognitive Ability During 35 Years of Adulthood". Psychological Science. 20 (9): 1146–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02425.x. PMC   2753423 . PMID   19686293.
  67. ↑ Kovas, Y; Haworth, CM; Dale, PS; Plomin, R (2007). "The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years". Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 72 (3): vii, 1–144. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00453.x. PMC   2784897 . PMID   17995572.
  68. ↑ Loehlin, JC; Horn, JM; Willerman, L (1989). "Modeling IQ Change: Evidence from the Texas Adoption Project". Child Development. 60 (4): 993–1004. doi:10.2307/1131039. JSTOR   1131039. PMID   2758892.
  69. ↑ Van Soelen, Inge L.C.; Brouwer, Rachel M.; Leeuwen, Marieke van; Kahn, René S.; Hulshoff Pol, Hilleke E.; Boomsma, Dorret I. (2012). "Heritability of Verbal and Performance Intelligence in a Pediatric Longitudinal Sample". Twin Research and Human Genetics. 14 (2): 119–28. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.204.6966 . doi:10.1375/twin.14.2.119. PMID   21425893. S2CID   16692953.
  70. ↑ Bartels, M; Rietveld, MJ; Van Baal, GC; Boomsma, DI (2002). "Genetic and environmental influences on the development of intelligence". Behavior Genetics. 32 (4): 237–49. doi:10.1023/A:1019772628912. PMID   12211623. S2CID   16547899. Archived from the original on 2022-03-04. Retrieved 2018-11-20.
  71. ↑ Hoekstra, Rosa A.; Bartels, Meike; Boomsma, Dorret I. (2007). "Longitudinal genetic study of verbal and nonverbal IQ from early childhood to young adulthood" (PDF). Learning and Individual Differences. 17 (2): 97–114. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.05.005. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2018-07-21. Retrieved 2018-11-20.
  72. ↑ Rietveld, MJ; Dolan, CV; Van Baal, GC; Boomsma, DI (2003). "A twin study of differentiation of cognitive abilities in childhood" (PDF). Behavior Genetics. 33 (4): 367–81. doi:10.1023/A:1025388908177. PMID   14574137. S2CID   8446452. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-02-25. Retrieved 2019-02-11.
  73. ↑ Moffitt, TE; Caspi, A; Harkness, AR; Silva, PA (1993). "The natural history of change in intellectual performance: Who changes? How much? Is it meaningful?". Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines. 34 (4): 455–506. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01031.x. PMID   8509490.
  74. ↑ Kong, Augustine; Thorleifsson, Gudmar; Frigge, Michael L.; Vilhjalmsson, Bjarni J.; Young, Alexander I.; Thorgeirsson, Thorgeir E.; Benonisdottir, Stefania; Oddsson, Asmundur; Halldorsson, Bjarni V.; Masson, Gisli; Gudbjartsson, Daniel F.; Helgason, Agnar; Bjornsdottir, Gyda; Thorsteinsdottir, Unnur; Stefansson, Kari (25 January 2018). "The nature of nurture: Effects of parental genotypes". Science. 359 (6374): 424–428. Bibcode:2018Sci...359..424K. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6877 . PMID   29371463.
  75. ↑ Deary, Ian J.; Strand, Steve; Smith, Pauline; Fernandes, Cres (January 2007). "Intelligence and educational achievement". Intelligence. 35 (1): 13–21. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001.
  76. 1 2 3 Rimfeld, Kaili; Shakeshaft, Nicholas G.; Malanchini, Margherita; Rodic, Maja; Selzam, Saskia; Schofield, Kerry; Dale, Philip S.; Kovas, Yulia; Plomin, Robert (2017). "Phenotypic and genetic evidence for a unifactorial structure of spatial abilities". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114 (10): 2777–2782. Bibcode:2017PNAS..114.2777R. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607883114 . JSTOR   26480105. PMC   5347574 . PMID   28223478.
  77. ↑ Payton, Antony (2009). "The Impact of Genetic Research on our Understanding of Normal Cognitive Ageing: 1995 to 2009". Neuropsychology Review. 19 (4): 451–77. doi:10.1007/s11065-009-9116-z. PMID   19768548. S2CID   27197807.
  78. 1 2 3 Chabris, C. F.; Hebert, B. M.; Benjamin, D. J.; Beauchamp, J.; Cesarini, D.; Van Der Loos, M.; Johannesson, M.; Magnusson, P. K. E.; Lichtenstein, P.; Atwood, C. S.; Freese, J.; Hauser, T. S.; Hauser, R. M.; Christakis, N.; Laibson, D. (2012). "Most Reported Genetic Associations with General Intelligence Are Probably False Positives". Psychological Science. 23 (11): 1314–23. doi:10.1177/0956797611435528. PMC   3498585 . PMID   23012269.
  79. ↑ Joshi, Peter K.; Esko, Tonu; Mattsson, Hannele; Eklund, Niina; Gandin, Ilaria; Nutile, Teresa; Jackson, Anne U.; Schurmann, Claudia; Smith, Albert V.; Zhang, Weihua; Okada, Yukinori; Stančáková, Alena; Faul, Jessica D.; Zhao, Wei; Bartz, Traci M.; Concas, Maria Pina; Franceschini, Nora; Enroth, Stefan; Vitart, Veronique; Trompet, Stella; Guo, Xiuqing; Chasman, Daniel I.; O'Connel, Jeffrey R.; Corre, Tanguy; Nongmaithem, Suraj S.; Chen, Yuning; Mangino, Massimo; Ruggiero, Daniela; Traglia, Michela; et al. (2015). "Directional dominance on stature and cognition in diverse human populations". Nature. 523 (7561): 459–462. Bibcode:2015Natur.523..459.. doi:10.1038/nature14618. PMC   4516141 . PMID   26131930.
  80. ↑ Jensen, Arthur (1998). The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers[ page needed ]
  81. ↑ Bouchard, Thomas J.; McGue, Matthew (1981). "Familial Studies of Intelligence: A Review". Science. 212 (4498): 1055–9. Bibcode:1981Sci...212.1055B. doi:10.1126/science.7195071. PMID   7195071.
  82. ↑ Kaufman, Alan S.; Lichtenberger, Elizabeth (2006). Assessing Adolescent and Adult Intelligence (3rd ed.). Hoboken (NJ): Wiley. ISBN   978-0-471-73553-3.[ page needed ]
  83. ↑ Plomin, Robert; Defries, J.C. (1980). "Genetics and intelligence: Recent data". Intelligence. 4: 15–24. doi:10.1016/0160-2896(80)90003-3.
  84. ↑ Hunt, Earl (2010). Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
  85. ↑ Brody, Nathan (1992). Intelligence. Gulf. pp. 145–146. ISBN   978-0-12-134251-7. Archived from the original on 2021-10-09. Retrieved 2020-08-31. These correlations should be compared to the correlation of .24 for biologically related siblings reared in these families.
  86. ↑ Alan S. Kaufman (2009). IQ Testing 101 . Springer Publishing Company. pp.  179–183. ISBN   978-0-8261-0629-2.
  87. 1 2 Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education. SAGE. 2012. p. 1209. ISBN   9781412981521. Archived from the original on 2021-02-25. Retrieved 2021-01-29.
  88. ↑ Nevid 2014, p. 271.
  89. ↑ Rushton, J. Philippe; Jensen, Arthur R. (2005). "Thirty Years of Research on Race Differences in Cognitive Ability". Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 11 (2): 235–294. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235. Archived from the original on 2021-01-15. Retrieved 2021-01-29.
  90. ↑ Mackintosh, J. N. (2011). IQ and Human Intelligence (second ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 338–39. ISBN   978-0-19-958559-5.
  91. ↑ Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (2012a). "Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments" (PDF). American Psychologist. 67 (2): 130–159. doi:10.1037/a0026699. ISSN   0003-066X. PMID   22233090. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
  92. ↑ Flynn, James R. (2010). "The spectacles through which I see the race and IQ debate" (PDF). Intelligence. 38 (4): 363–366. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.05.001. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-12-07. Retrieved 2021-01-29.
  93. ↑ Mackintosh 2011, p. 337.
  94. ↑ Thomas, Drew (2017). "Racial IQ Differences among Transracial Adoptees: Fact or Artifact?". Journal of Intelligence. 5 (1): 1. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence5010001 . PMC   6526420 . PMID   31162392.
  95. ↑ Hunt, Earl (2010). Human Intelligence. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-70781-7.
  96. ↑ Nisbett, Richard (2009). Intelligence and How to Get It: Why Schools and Cultures Count. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN   978-0-393-06505-3.
  97. ↑ Vincent, Ken R. (March 1991). "Black/white IQ differences: Does age make the difference?". Journal of Clinical Psychology. 47 (2): 266–270. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199103)47:2<266::AID-JCLP2270470213>3.0.CO;2-S. PMID   2030133. Archived from the original on 2021-02-08. Retrieved 2021-01-29.
  98. 1 2 Dickens, William T. (2006). "Black Americans Reduce the Racial IQ Gap: Evidence from Standardization Samples" (PDF). Psychological Science. 17 (10): 913–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01802.x. PMID   17100793. S2CID   6593169. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-09-24.
  99. ↑ Neisser, Ulric (Ed). 1998. The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association
  100. ↑ Mackintosh 2011.
  101. ↑ Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Blair, Clancy; Dickens, William; Flynn, James; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (2012a). "Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments" (PDF). American Psychologist. 67 (2): 130–159. doi:10.1037/a0026699. ISSN   0003-066X. PMID   22233090. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 November 2020. Retrieved 22 July 2013.
  102. ↑ Nisbett 2009 , p. 101
  103. ↑ Cooper 2005
  104. ↑ Mackintosh 2011, pp. 343–44.
  105. ↑ Reichman 2005
  106. ↑ Campbell et al. 2002
  107. ↑ Fagan, Joseph F; Holland, Cynthia R (2002). "Equal opportunity and racial differences in IQ". Intelligence. 30 (4): 361–387. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00080-6.
  108. ↑ Fagan, J.F.; Holland, C.R. (2007). "Racial equality in intelligence: Predictions from a theory of intelligence as processing". Intelligence. 35 (4): 319–334. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.08.009.
  109. ↑ Daley & Onwuegbuzie 2011.

Sources

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.