Intrastate Commerce Improvement Act

Last updated

The Intrastate Commerce Improvement Act is a 2015 Arkansas act that prohibits, with exception to employees of a local government, any county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state from adopting or enforcing an ordinance, resolution, rule, or policy that creates a protected classification or prohibits discrimination on a basis not contained in state law. [1]

Contents

Background

On August 20, 2014, the Fayetteville City Council passed an ordinance prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in public and private employment, housing, and public accommodations. [2]

On December 9, 2014, Fayetteville voted 51.66% in favor of repealing the ordinance. [3]

Legislative history

This bill was sponsored by state senator Bart Hester. On February 9, 2015, Arkansas State Senate passed, with 24 voting in favor, 8 voting against, and 2 not voting, SB 202. On February 13, 2015, the Arkansas House of Representatives passed, with a 58 in favor, 21 voting against, 14 not voting, and 7 voting present, SB 202. On February 24, 2015, SB 202 became Act 137 without the signature of Governor Asa Hutchinson. On July 22, 2015, Act 137 went into effect. [4] [5]

Response

Map of Arkansas cities that have sexual orientation anti-employment discrimination ordinances
Sexual orientation and gender identity with anti-employment discrimination ordinance
Sexual orientation and gender identity solely in public employment
Does not protect sexual orientation and gender identity in employment Arkansas counties and cities with sexual orientation and gender identity protection.svg
Map of Arkansas cities that have sexual orientation anti–employment discrimination ordinances
  Sexual orientation and gender identity with anti–employment discrimination ordinance
  Sexual orientation and gender identity solely in public employment
  Does not protect sexual orientation and gender identity in employment

On February 9, 2015, the Eureka Springs City Council voted 5-0 in favor of Ordinance 2223, an ordinance prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in public and private employment, housing, and public accommodations. [6]

On April 21, 2015, the Little Rock Board voted 7-2 to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in public and private employment, housing, and public accommodations. [7]

On June 16, 2015, the Fayetteville City Council passed Ordinance 5781, an ordinance prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in public and private employment, housing, and public accommodations. [8]

On September 1, 2015, Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge issued a statement on Fayetteville's Ordinance 5781 on the reviewed ordinances was in conflict with Act 137 and unenforceable. [9]

On September 8, 2015, Fayetteville voted 52.77% in favor of Ordinance 5781. [10]

Protect Fayetteville v. City of Fayetteville

On March 1, 2016, Washington County Circuit Judge Doug Martin ruled that the Fayetteville, Arkansas was allowed to enforce Ordinance 5781. The ruling was based on the Fayetteville City Attorney's argument that state law provided protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity in sections other than the state's anti-discrimination code, making the city's ordinance legally enforceable. Martin stated, "Clearly, the classifications of gender identity and sexual orientation were classifications of persons protected on bases contained in state law prior to the enactment of (Fayetteville's ordinance)." Martin did not, however, rule on the ultimate constitutionality of Fayetteville's ordinance. Fayetteville attorneys predicted that the ordinance would be featured in an Arkansas Supreme Court ruling in the future. [11]

On February 23, 2017, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in a 7-0 ruling that Ordinance 5781 of Fayetteville, Arkansas violated the Intrastate Commerce Improvement Act "by extending discrimination laws in the City of Fayetteville to include two classifications (sexual orientation and gender identity) not previously included under state law, thus creating a direct inconsistency between state and municipal law." The Arkansas Supreme Court sent the case back to the Washington County judge who upheld Fayetteville's ordinance. Attorney General Leslie Rutledge, whose office had asked the court to uphold the state law, said she was grateful for the court's ruling. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

LGBT rights in Michigan

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Michigan may face legal challenges not faced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Michigan, as is same-sex marriage. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is not explicitly banned within state law. However, a ruling of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals and a decision of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission have ensured that members of the LGBT community are not discriminated against and are protected in the eyes of the law.

LGBT rights in Ohio

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Ohio may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Ohio. Families headed by same-sex spouses are eligible for the same protections available to different-sex spouses, but discrimination based on sexual orientation isn't banned statewide. Same-sex marriage has been legal since June 2015.

LGBT rights in Florida

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in the U.S. state of Florida may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity became legal in the state after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas on June 26, 2003, and same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since January 6, 2015. Florida law does not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in employment, housing and public accommodations. However, several cities and counties, comprising about 55% of Florida's population, have enacted anti-discrimination ordinances. These include Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa, Orlando, St. Petersburg, and Tallahassee, among others. Furthermore, discrimination on the basis of gender identity has been illegal in Florida since 2011 via Glenn v. Brumby, a court case decided by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Conversion therapy is also banned in a number of cities in the state, mainly in the Miami metropolitan area.

LGBT rights in Georgia (U.S. state)

LGBT residents in the U.S. state of Georgia face legal and social challenges not faced by non-LGBT individuals. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1998, and same-sex marriage has been legal since 2015. Atlanta, however, has a vibrant LGBT community, and holds one of the biggest Pride parades in the Southeast.

LGBT rights in Arkansas

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Arkansas may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arkansas. Same-sex marriage became briefly legal through a court ruling on May 9, 2014, subject to court stays and appeals. In June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that laws banning same-sex marriage are unconstitutional, legalizing same-sex marriage in the United States nationwide including in Arkansas. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is not banned statewide in Arkansas.

LGBT rights in Arizona

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in the U.S. state of Arizona may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arizona, and same-sex couples are able to marry and adopt.

LGBT rights in Indiana

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Indiana may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Indiana since October 6, 2014, when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal in the case of Baskin v. Bogan.

LGBT rights in Tennessee

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Tennesseans face some legal challenges that non-LGBT Tennesseans do not. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in the state. Marriage licenses have been issued to same-sex couples in Tennessee since the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015.

LGBT rights in Virginia

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. Commonwealth of Virginia do not enjoy the same rights that non-LGBT residents do. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Virginia since October 6, 2014, when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to consider an appeal in the case of Bostic v. Rainey. Despite this, there is still only limited rights for LGBT persons in Virginia, since there is no statewide law protecting LGBT persons from discrimination in housing, credit, or any other area, with the exception of statewide employment, the state's hate crime laws do not protect against violence committed based on sexual orientation or gender identity, and Virginia's statute criminalizing sodomy between same-sex and opposite-sex couples, though declared unconstitutional in 2003, was not repealed until 11 years later in 2014.

LGBT rights in New Mexico

New Mexico has seen prominent advances in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in recent decades, homosexuality being legal since 1975, and more progress has been made since then, especially post 2000s. Same-sex marriage is legal statewide in New Mexico, as is adoption and donor insemination rights for lesbian couples. Same-sex couples now enjoy the same rights as heterosexual married couples. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is banned statewide. Additionally, conversion therapy on minors is prohibited in the state.

LGBT rights in South Carolina

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of South Carolina may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in South Carolina. Same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples. However, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is not banned statewide.

LGBT rights in Kentucky

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. commonwealth of Kentucky have most of the same rights as non-LGBT persons have, but still face some legal challenges not experienced by other people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Kentucky. Same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are not eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples. On February 12, 2014, a federal judge ruled that the state must recognize same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions, but the ruling was put on hold pending review by the Sixth Circuit. Same sex-marriage is now legal in the state under the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. The decision, which struck down Kentucky's statutory and constitutional bans on same-sex marriages, and all other same sex marriage bans elsewhere in the country, was handed down on June 26, 2015.

LGBT rights in Montana

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Montana may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Montana. Same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples, as same-sex marriage has been legal since November 2014. However, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is not banned statewide.

LGBT rights in Idaho

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in the U.S state of Idaho may face some legal challenges not faced by non-LGBT people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Idaho, and same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since October 2014. Discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is not banned in the state, leaving an estimated 31,800 LGBT workers in Idaho vulnerable to employment discrimination. Despite this, opinion polls have found a majority of Idahoans as supporting LGBT anti-discrimination laws, same-sex marriage and LGBT rights.

LGBT rights in Kansas

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Kansas face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Kansas. Although LGBT people are not covered under statewide anti-discrimination laws, certain cities and municipalities have enacted such protections and state level protections exist for state and public workers.

LGBT rights in Alaska

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Alaska may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT Alaskans. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal since 1980, and same-sex couples have had the right to marry since October 2014. Nevertheless, the state offers few legal protections on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, leaving LGBT people vulnerable to employment, housing, and public accommodations discrimination. Discrimination against state employees on account of their sexual orientation is illegal, and three Alaskan cities, Anchorage, Juneau and Sitka, representing about 46% of the Alaskan population, have enacted anti-discrimination ordinances covering both categories.

LGBT rights in Mississippi

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Mississippi face legal challenges and discrimination not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Mississippi. Same-sex marriage is legal in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges. However, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity is not banned statewide. Jackson, Mississippi's state capital, enacted such protections in June 2016.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2015.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2016.

References

  1. For An Act To Be Entitled
  2. Fayetteville passes civil rights ordinance
  3. Fayetteville voters approve repeal of sexual orientation ordinance
  4. SB202 - TO AMEND THE LAW CONCERNING ORDINANCES OF CITIES AND COUNTIES BY CREATING THE INTRASTATE COMMERCE IMPROVEMENT ACT AND TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY.
  5. Protect Fayetteville v. City of Fayetteville
  6. Eureka Springs quickly passes anti-prejudice law
  7. Little Rock approves anti-discrimination protections
  8. Fayetteville City Council Passes New Non-Discrimination Ordinance
  9. "State of Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge". Archived from the original on 2015-09-07. Retrieved 2016-02-01.
  10. City of Fayetteville Special E
  11. "Court rules against Arkansas LGBT rights ban". Archived from the original on 2017-06-15. Retrieved 2017-06-06.
  12. Arkansas Supreme Court strikes down city's LGBT protections