Jus trium liberorum

Last updated
Nursing infants among images of divinities, plant life, flowing water, and animals promoting fecundity on the Ara Pacis (1st century BCE), contemporary with the ius liberorum of Augustus Ara Pacis Augustae, facciata posteriore 05.jpg
Nursing infants among images of divinities, plant life, flowing water, and animals promoting fecundity on the Ara Pacis (1st century BCE), contemporary with the ius liberorum of Augustus

The jus trium liberorum (Latin, "the right of three children"; also spelled ius), [1] was a privilege awarded to Roman citizens who had produced at least three children or to freedpersons who had produced at least four. [2] The privilege resulted from the Lex Papia Poppaea and other legislation on morality introduced by Augustus in the first centuries BCE and CE. [3] These laws were intended to increase the dwindling population of the Roman upper classes.

Contents

The intent of the jus trium liberorum has been interpreted by a few scholars as eugenic legislation, [4] but the predominant view is that it was intended to increase birth rates among the senatorial order. [5] Men who had received the jus trium liberorum were excused from munera (compulsory services). Women with jus trium liberorum were no longer subject to tutela mulierum (guardianship by a male relative) and could receive inheritances which would otherwise descend to their children. [6]

The senatorial reaction to the jus trium liberorum was largely to find loopholes, however. The prospect of having a large family was still not appealing. [7] A person who caught a citizen in violation in this law was entitled to a portion of the inheritance involved, creating a lucrative business for professional spies. [8] The spies became so pervasive that the reward was reduced to a quarter of its previous size. [9] As time went on, the jus trium liberorum was granted by consuls to some citizens as rewards for general good deeds, holding important professions or as personal favors, not just prolific propagation. [10] Eventually the jus trium liberorum was repealed in 534 AD by Justinian. [11]

Background

During the Augustan period the upper classes, the senatorial and equestrian orders, were diminishing in number. These classes formed the backbone of the state, forming the empire's civil and military administration. The classes’ populations had been affected by the recent civil wars, proscription, and most importantly, low birth rates within the classes. The decrease in birth rate was even more dramatic than is typical for the increase in Rome's development. [12] The Lex Iulia and the Papia Poppaea had been able to increase marriage rates within the upper classes, but the birthrate had not increased enough through these bodies of legislation alone. For this reason the jus trium liberorum was enacted. [13]

Eugenic implications

At the time, Italy's population as a whole was not decreasing and may have been increasing. The growth in population was largely due to the influx of slaves from outside of Italy. The jus trium liberorum, therefore, has been called a eugenic measure by scholars as it specifically worked toward increasing a specific population deemed desirable. [14] It is argued that the aspect of population growth in the jus trium liberorum was a secondary intention. [15]

Funerary stele from Roman-era Thessaloniki (168-190 CE) depicting a woman and her deceased husband, the couple's three sons, and an older woman who is possibly their grandmother Funeral stele with six portraits (8725572825).jpg
Funerary stele from Roman-era Thessaloniki (168–190 CE) depicting a woman and her deceased husband, the couple's three sons, and an older woman who is possibly their grandmother

The jus trium liberorum was a reward gained by compliance with the Lex Iulia and Papia Poppea. The privilege concerned both sexes, but impacted women more than men. The specifics of the jus trium liberorum is defined as follows in Adolf Berger's Encyclopedia of Roman Law:

Fathers might claim exemption (excusatio) from public charges and from guardianship to which they were called by law (tutela legitima). The most important application of jus liberorum concerned women. A freeborn woman with three children and a freedwoman with four children (jus trium vel quattuor liberorum) were freed from guardianship to which women were subject (tutela mulierum) and had a right of succession to the inheritance of their children. The women’s jus liberorum was applied even when the children were no longer alive. [16]

In short this meant that a man could not be forced to take over the obligation of guardianship of a woman, legally a minor, that he would otherwise be obligated under the tutela mulierum. [17] Women who had the appropriate number of children no longer needed to have a guardian as they would under the tutela mulierum. This meant that when a woman was no longer subject to the power of her father (patria potestas) or her husband (manus) she could act independently. [18] She also gained the right to inheritance that would have otherwise been awarded to her children. Often this meant that she inherited and owned her husband's estate upon his death. [19] As stated above children did not need to be alive for them to count toward the jus liberorum. Legitimate children were counted for men and women. Children born to an unknown father (spurius) did count toward a woman's number of children under the jus trium liberorum. [20] A child considered to be a portentum (literally a monster or monstrous being [21] ) was not considered to be a human but still counted toward the mother's number of children under the jus trium liberorum. Both parents could count a child deemed a portentum under the laws against childless parents in the Lex Iulia and Papia Poppaea, however. [22]

Impact

After being enacted this right was considered valuable, but it soon became a privilege unconnected with three or more births to a citizen. Many people did not want the burden of children, but still sought the jus trium liberorum. This enticed many people to exploit loopholes in the law, which was often accomplished through illegal means. A reward consisting of a percentage of the inheritance involved was offered for spies who caught others illegally benefitting from the jus trium liberorum. This reward created a large number of spies due to the lucrative rewards. To reduce the problem of spies the reward was then reduced to a quarter of its previous size. [23] The jus trium liberorum was also awarded to people in no connection with their number of offspring as a reward by the emperor. Often it was awarded in connection with a good deed, military service or as a personal favor. [24] Many famous Romans were awarded the jus trium liberorum including Suetonius through a personal favor from Trajan to Pliny the Younger, [25] Martial by Domitian in reward to Martial's flattery, [26] and to Livia in response of the death of Drusus in 9 BCE. [27] Owners of large ships were also granted the jus trium liberorum under the Empire. [28] The jus trium liberorum was eventually repealed by Justinian in 534 CE. [29]

See also

Notes

  1. Perseus Digital Library Project
  2. Berger, pg. 530
  3. Yue, pg. 685
  4. Field, pg. 398-399
  5. Kaius Tuori "Augustus, Legislative Power, and the Power of Appearances," in Fundaminia 20:2 2014, 942-3
  6. Berger, pg. 530
  7. Field, pg. 408
  8. Yue, pg. 686
  9. Field, pg. 412
  10. Field, pg. 408
  11. Field, pg. 398
  12. Field, pg. 399
  13. Field, pg. 402
  14. Field, pg. 398 - 399
  15. Field, pg. 414
  16. Berger, pg. 530
  17. Yue, pg. 683
  18. Berger, pg. 748
  19. Field, pg. 408
  20. Berger, pg. 714
  21. Perseus Digital Library Project
  22. Berger, 636
  23. Field, pg. 412 - 413
  24. Field, pg. 408
  25. Dunham, pg. 421 - 422
  26. Clarke, pg. 47
  27. Field, pg. 408
  28. Berger, 592 - 593
  29. Field, pg. 398

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in ancient Rome</span>

Freeborn women in ancient Rome were citizens (cives), but could not vote or hold political office. Because of their limited public role, women are named less frequently than men by Roman historians. But while Roman women held no direct political power, those from wealthy or powerful families could and did exert influence through private negotiations. Exceptional women who left an undeniable mark on history include Lucretia and Claudia Quinta, whose stories took on mythic significance; fierce Republican-era women such as Cornelia, mother of the Gracchi, and Fulvia, who commanded an army and issued coins bearing her image; women of the Julio-Claudian dynasty, most prominently Livia and Agrippina the Younger, who contributed to the formation of Imperial mores; and the empress Helena, a driving force in promoting Christianity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Poppaea Sabina</span> Second wife of Emperor Nero

Poppaea Sabina, also known as Ollia, was a Roman empress as the second wife of the emperor Nero. She had also been wife to the future emperor Otho. The historians of antiquity describe her as a beautiful woman who used intrigues to become empress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gaius (jurist)</span> Roman jurist (2nd century AD)

Gaius was a Roman jurist. Little is known about his personal life, including his name. It is also difficult to ascertain the span of his life, but it is assumed he lived from AD 110 to at least AD 179, as he wrote on legislation passed within that time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman citizenship</span> Citizenship in ancient Rome

Citizenship in ancient Rome was a privileged political and legal status afforded to free individuals with respect to laws, property, and governance. Citizenship in ancient Rome was complex and based upon many different laws, traditions, and cultural practices. There existed several different types of citizenship, determined by one's gender, class, and political affiliations, and the exact duties or expectations of a citizen varied throughout the history of the Roman Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal rights of women in history</span>

The legal rights of women refers to the social and human rights of women. One of the first women's rights declarations was the Declaration of Sentiments. The dependent position of women in early law is proved by the evidence of most ancient systems.

<i>Lex Papia Poppaea</i> Ancient Roman law

The Lex Papia et Poppaea, also referred to as the Lex Iulia et Papia, was a Roman law introduced in 9 AD to encourage and strengthen marriage. It included provisions against adultery and against celibacy after a certain age and complemented and supplemented Augustus' Lex Iulia de maritandis ordinibus of 18 BC and the Lex Iulia de adulteriis coercendis of 17 BC. The law was introduced by the suffect consuls of that year, Marcus Papius Mutilus and Quintus Poppaeus Secundus, although they themselves were unmarried.

Fiscus was the treasury of the Roman Empire. It was initially the personal wealth of the emperors, funded by taxation on the imperial provinces, assumption of estates and other privileges. By the third century it was understood as a state fund rather than a personal one, albeit under the emperor's control. It is the origin of the English term "fiscal."

Quintus Mucius Scaevola "Pontifex" was a politician of the Roman Republic and an important early authority on Roman law. He is credited with founding the study of law as a systematic discipline. He was elected Pontifex Maximus, as had been his father and uncle before him. He was the first Roman Pontifex Maximus to be murdered publicly, in Rome in the temple of the Vestal Virgins, signifying a breakdown of historical norms and religious taboos in the Republic.

A lex Julia was an ancient Roman law that was introduced by any member of the gens Julia. Most often, "Julian laws", lex Julia or leges Juliae refer to moral legislation introduced by Augustus in 23 BC, or to a law related to Julius Caesar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marriage in ancient Rome</span> Social institution in the classical Roman civilization

Marriage in ancient Rome was a fundamental institution of society and was used by Romans primarily as a tool for interfamilial alliances. Roman marriage was a monogamous institution: Roman citizens could have only one spouse at a time but were allowed to divorce and remarry. This form of monogamy in Greco-Roman civilization may have arisen from the relative egalitarianism of democratic and republican city-states. Early Christianity embraced this ideal of monogamous marriage, and perpetuated it as an essential element in many later Western cultures.

Birth certificates for Roman citizens were introduced during the reign of Augustus. Until the time of Alexander Severus, it was required that these documents be written in Latin as a marker of "Romanness" (Romanitas).

Lex Voconia was a law established in ancient Rome in 169 BC.

<i>Ius</i> Rights to citizenship virtue in ancient Rome

Ius or Jus in ancient Rome was a right to which a citizen (civis) was entitled by virtue of his citizenship (civitas). The iura were specified by laws, so ius sometimes meant law. As one went to the law courts to sue for one's rights, ius also meant justice and the place where justice was sought.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curia (wife of Quintus Lucretius)</span>

Curia was a Roman woman, and the wife of Quintus Lucretius Vespillo. The name "Curia" is possibly derived from the nomen Curius.

<i>Tutela</i> Ancient Roman concept of "guardianship"

Tutela was the ancient Roman concept of "guardianship", conceived of as a goddess in the Imperial period, and from the earliest period as a functional role that various tutelary deities might play, particularly Juno. Tutela had particular applications in Roman law.

Susan Treggiari is an English scholar of Ancient Rome, emeritus professor of Stanford University and retired member of the Faculty of Classics at the University of Oxford. Her specialist areas of study are the family and marriage in ancient Rome, Cicero and the late Roman Republic.

The jurisprudence of Catholic canon law is the complex of legal theory, traditions, and interpretative principles of Catholic canon law. In the Latin Church, the jurisprudence of canon law was founded by Gratian in the 1140s with his Decretum. In the Eastern Catholic canon law of the Eastern Catholic Churches, Photios holds a place similar to that of Gratian for the West.

The Law of Jordan is influenced by Ottoman law and European laws. The Constitution of Jordan of 1952 affirmed Islam as the state religion, but it did not state that Islam is the source of legislation. Jordanian penal code has been influenced by the French Penal Code of 1810.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Concubinatus</span> Quasi-marital relationship involving Roman citizens

Concubinatus was a monogamous union, intended to be of some duration but not necessarily permanent, that was socially and to some extent legally recognized as an alternative to marriage in the Roman Empire. Concubinage became a legal concern in response to Augustan moral legislation that criminalized adultery and imposed penalties on some consensual sexual behaviors outside marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ancient Roman freedmen</span> Social class of former slaves

Freedmen in ancient Rome existed as a distinct social class (liberti or libertini), with former slaves granted freedom and rights through the legal process of manumission. The Roman practice of slavery utilized slaves for both production and domestic labour, overseen by their wealthy masters. Urban and domestic slaves especially could achieve high levels of education, acting as agents and representatives of their masters' affairs and finances. Within Roman law there was a set of practices for freeing trusted slaves, granting them a limited form of Roman citizenship or Latin rights. These freed slaves were known in Latin as liberti (freedmen), and formed a class set apart from freeborn Romans. While freedmen were barred from some forms of social mobility in Roman society, many achieved high levels of wealth and status. Liberti were an important part of the "most economically active and innovative entrepreneurial class" in the Roman Empire. The legal and social status of freedmen remained a point of cultural and legal contention throughout the Republic and Empire.