Eugenics in Japan

Last updated

Eugenics has influenced political, public health and social movements in Japan since the late 19th and early 20th century. Originally brought to Japan through the United States (like Charles Davenport and John Coulter), through Mendelian inheritance by way of German influences, and French Lamarckian eugenic written studies of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. [1] Eugenics as a science was hotly debated at the beginning of the 20th, in Jinsei-Der Mensch, the first eugenics journal in the Empire. As the Japanese sought to close ranks with the West, this practice was adopted wholesale, along with colonialism and its justifications. [2]

Contents

The concept of pureblood as a criterion for the uniqueness of the Yamato people began circulating around 1880 in Japan, while eugenics in the sense of instrumental and selective procreation, clustered around two positions concerning blood, the pure blood (純血, junketsu) and the mixed blood (混血, konketsu). [2]

Popularity of the pure-blood eugenics theory came from a homegrown racial purity or monoculture national belief that has been part of Japanese society since ancient times[ citation needed ]. The local movement was however less focused on modern scientific ideals and more on the "outside person" vs the "native or inside person" and blood purity. [2]

Later legal measures were supported by certain politicians and movements that sought to increase the number of healthy pure Japanese, while simultaneously decreasing the number of people suffering mental retardation, disability, genetic disease and other conditions that led to them being viewed as "inferior" contributions to the Japanese gene pool. [3] [4]

Opposition to the eugenics movement persisted amongst several right-wing factions, including members of the Diet of Japan and obstetricians, who perceived eugenics as suggesting that the Japanese people were only animals, not inhabitants of the "country of the kami" (神国, shinkoku) as believed by the Japanese national Shinto tradition. [5] Yoshiichi Sōwa (曽和義弌), author of "Japan's Shinto Revolution", [6] wrote in 1940, "When we look up into the past, the people of our country are descended from the kami . Are they claiming we must sterilize these people?" [7]

Origins of Japanese domestic scientific eugenics

Yamanouchi Shige (1876–1973), a plant cytologist, was one of the early and important members of the Japanese eugenics movement, who was trained under John Merle Coulter (1851–1928) an American eugenicist and botanist. He was a major promoter and academic of early Lamarckian theory, but later blended his ideas with Mendelian evolutionary theory.

His career is a direct link between United States and Japanese eugenics. His approach has been credited with searching for a way for the Japanese race to genetically surpass what was then the "dominant Western race" of the 19th and early 20th centuries by breeding smarter and stronger Japanese people. [8]

According to Jennifer Robertson of the University of Michigan, eugenism, as part of the new scientific order, was introduced in Japan "under the aegis of nationalism and empire building." [9] She identifies "positive eugenism" and "negative eugenism." Positive eugenism, promoted by Ikeda Shigenori, refers to "the improvement of circumstances of sexual reproduction and thus incorporates advances in sanitation, nutrition and physical education into strategies to shape the reproductive choices and decisions of individual and families" [10] Negative Eugenism, promoted by Hisomu Nagai, "involves the prevention of sexual reproduction, through induced abortion or sterilization among people deemed unfit". [10] "Unfit" included people such as alcoholics, lepers, the mentally ill, the physically disabled, and criminals. [10]

Social Darwinism was at that time gaining credibility with scientists around the world and thus was introduced to Japan as well. [11]

Eugenic policies

Ikeda Shigenori (池田 林儀), a journalist who had been sent to Germany, started the magazine Eugenics movement (優生運動, Yūsei-undō) in 1926. In 1928, he promoted December 21 as "Blood-purity day" (junketsu de) and sponsored free blood tests at the Tokyo Hygiene Laboratory. [12]

Nagai, the "Doctor of Eugenics", assumed the position of chief director of The Japanese Society of Health and Human Ecology (JSHHE), which was established in 1930. [13]

By the early 1930s detailed "eugenic marriage" questionnaires were printed or inserted in popular magazines for public consumption. [14] Promoters like Ikeda were convinced that these marriage surveys would not only insure the eugenic fitness of spouses but also help avoid class differences that could disrupt and even destroy marriage. The goal was to create a database of individuals and their entire households which would enable eugenicists to conduct in-depth surveys of any given family's genealogy. [12]

An Investigation of Global Policy with the Yamato Race as Nucleus , a secret document for the use of policy-makers, cited eugenics approvingly, calling for the medical profession not to concentrate on the sick and weak, and for mental and physical training and selective marriages to improve the population. [15]

National Eugenic Law

After rejection of the originally submitted Race Eugenic Protection Law in 1938, National Eugenic Law ( ja:国民優生法 , Kokumin Yūsei Hō) was promulgated in 1940 by the Konoe government. [16]

This law limited compulsory sterilization to "inherited mental disease", promoted genetic screening and restricted birth control access. [17] According to Matsubara Yoko, from 1940 to 1945, 454 people were sterilized in Japan under this law. [18]

There were also campaigns to ensure reproduction amongst the "intelligent or superior elements" in the population. [5]

Family center staff also attempted to discourage marriage between Japanese women and Korean men who had been recruited from the peninsula as laborers following its annexation by Japan in 1910. In 1942, a survey report argued that:

the Korean laborers brought to Japan, where they have established permanent residency, are of the lower classes and therefore of inferior constitution... By fathering children with Japanese women, these men could lower the caliber of the Yamato minzoku. [2]

Eugenism was criticized by some Shinto ultranationalists as it seemed to treat Japanese people, considered of divine origin, as animals to be "bred". [19] According to Nagai Hisomu, the Japanese Army's ignorance and dismissal of the science behind eugenics also stalled the spread of eugenic ideology. [20]

Nakano Seigō, leader of the Tōhōkai, despite his political inspiration in Fascism and Nazism, harshly criticized eugenics, supremacism and racial theories and argued against the idea of the superiority of the "Yamato race" by claiming that the Japanese were part of the same Asian race as the Chinese or Koreans. According to Nakano, the divine mission of the Japanese Empire was not to oppress and subjugate other peoples but to liberate them from colonialism and unite them as part of a common Asian civilization. [21]

After 1945

One of the last eugenic measures of the war regime was taken by the Higashikuni government. On 19 August 1945, the Home Ministry ordered local government offices to establish a prostitution service for Allied occupation soldiers to preserve the "purity" of the "Japanese race". The official declaration stated that:

Through the sacrifice of thousands of "Okichis" of the Shōwa era, we shall construct a dike to hold back the mad frenzy of the occupation troops and cultivate and preserve the purity of our race long into the future... [22]

Such clubs were soon established by cabinet councillor Yoshio Kodama and Ryoichi Sasakawa.[ citation needed ]

In post-war Japan, the Eugenic Protection Law ( ja:優生保護法 , Yūsei Hogo Hō) was enacted in 1948 to replace the National Eugenic Law of 1940. [23] The main provisions allowed for voluntary and involuntary eugenic operations (sterilizations) of people who had hereditary diseases (Article 4), non-hereditary mental illness and intellectual disability (Article 12), [24] as well as where pregnancy would endanger the life of the woman. The operation did not require consent of the woman and her spouse, but the approval of the Prefectural Eugenic Protection Council. [25] In addition to hereditary conditions, some doctors believed forced sterilization on normal mental patients was in the public interest. The operation was "enthusiastically recommended" for normal mental patients at some mental health institutions as recently as the 1970s. [26]

The law also allowed for abortion for pregnancies in the cases of rape, leprosy, hereditarily-transmitted disease, or if the physician determined that the fetus would not be viable outside of the womb. Again, the consent of the woman and her spouse were not necessary. Birth control guidance and implementation was restricted to doctors, nurses and professional midwives accredited by the Prefectural government. The law was also amended in May 1949 to allow abortions for economic reasons at the sole discretion of the doctor, which in effect fully legalized abortion in Japan. [25] After 1950, more than one million abortions each year were performed in Japan. [26]

Forced sterilizations peaked at the end of the 1950s, reaching over 1,000 a year, and declined after that - by the 1980s they were only performed very rarely. [26] In total, about 25,000 people, mostly women or girls as young as nine or ten years old, were forcibly sterilized between 1948 and 1996. Of those, about 16,500 did not consent to the procedure. [27]

Abolition of eugenics laws

Laws that decreed compulsory sterilization of the disabled were abolished with the approval of the Mother's Body Protection Law ( 母体保護法 ) on 18 June 1996. [28] In 2019, the National Diet passed a law granting ¥3.2 million in compensation to each person who underwent forced sterilization under the old law. [29] Around 16,500 people were operated on without consent and 8,000 more gave their consent, with at least some likely being under duress. [30]

Some of those impacted by the old law sued the government for higher levels of compensation than offered by the 2019 law. In July 2024, the Supreme Court of Japan ruled that the Eugenic Protection Law passed in 1948 was unconstitutional, and eliminated the 20-year statute of limitations for those affected by the law. [31] [32] Later that month, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida formally apologized to 130 victims of forced sterilization under the Eugenics Protection Law passed in 1948, and approved compensation measures for at least 25,000 affected victims or their relatives. [33]

Leprosy policies

The Leprosy Prevention laws of 1907, 1931 and 1953, the last one only repealed in 1996, permitted the segregation of patients in sanitaria where forced abortions and sterilization were common, even if the laws did not refer to it, and authorized punishment of patients "disturbing peace" as most Japanese leprologists believed that vulnerability to the disease was inheritable. [34]

There were a few Japanese leprologists such as Noburo Ogasawara who argued against the "isolation-sterilization policy" but he was denounced as a traitor to the nation at the 15th Conference of the Japanese Association of Leprology in 1941. [35] Under the colonial Korean Leprosy prevention ordinance, Korean patients were also subjected to hard labor. [36]

In postwar Japan, the Eugenic Protection Law (優生保護法, Yūsei Hogo Hō) was enacted in 1948 to replace the National Eugenic Law of 1940. The indications of the Eugenic Protection Law included leprosy. This condition discontinued when the law changed into the Women's Body Protection Law.

See also

Related Research Articles

Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Despite the changing attitudes about sterilization, the Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell. It is widely believed to have been weakened by Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942), which involved compulsory sterilization of male habitual criminals. Legal scholar and Holmes biographer G. Edward White, in fact, wrote, "the Supreme Court has distinguished the case [Buck v. Bell] out of existence". In addition, federal statutes, including the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, provide protections for people with disabilities, defined as both physical and mental impairments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Compulsory sterilization</span> Sterilization effected by government coercion

Compulsory sterilization, also known as forced or coerced sterilization, refers to any government-mandated program to involuntarily sterilize a specific group of people. Sterilization removes a person's capacity to reproduce, and is usually done by surgical or chemical means.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Popenoe</span> American eugenicist (1888–1979)

Paul Bowman Popenoe was an American marriage counselor, eugenicist and agricultural explorer. He was an influential advocate of the compulsory sterilization of mentally ill people and people with mental disabilities, and the father of marriage counseling in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Racial Integrity Act of 1924</span> Virginia anti-miscegenation law

In 1924, the Virginia General Assembly enacted the Racial Integrity Act. The act reinforced racial segregation by prohibiting interracial marriage and classifying as "white" a person "who has no trace whatsoever of any blood other than Caucasian". The act, an outgrowth of eugenicist and scientific racist propaganda, was pushed by Walter Plecker, a white supremacist and eugenicist who held the post of registrar of the Virginia Bureau of Vital Statistics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry H. Laughlin</span> American eugenicist (1880–1943)

Harry Hamilton Laughlin was an American educator and eugenicist. He served as the superintendent of the Eugenics Record Office from its inception in 1910 to its closure in 1939, and was among the most active individuals influencing American eugenics policy, especially compulsory sterilization legislation.

The Adelphi Genetics Forum is a non-profit learned society based in the United Kingdom. Its aims are "to promote the public understanding of human heredity and to facilitate informed debate about the ethical issues raised by advances in reproductive technology."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph DeJarnette</span> American physician and activist (1866–1957)

Joseph Spencer DeJarnette was the director of Western State Hospital from 1905 to November 15, 1943. He was a vocal proponent of racial segregation and eugenics, specifically, the compulsory sterilization of the mentally ill.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nazi eugenics</span> Nazi German policy of the murder of "undesirable" persons from the German people

The social policies of eugenics in Nazi Germany were composed of various ideas about genetics. The racial ideology of Nazism placed the biological improvement of the German people by selective breeding of "Nordic" or "Aryan" traits at its center. These policies were used to justify the involuntary sterilization and mass-murder of those deemed "undesirable".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring</span> 1933 compulsory sterilisation law in Nazi Germany

Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring or "Sterilisation Law" was a statute in Nazi Germany enacted on July 14, 1933, which allowed the compulsory sterilisation of any citizen who in the opinion of a "Genetic Health Court" suffered from a list of alleged genetic disorders – many of which were not, in fact, genetic. The elaborate interpretive commentary on the law was written by three dominant figures in the racial hygiene movement: Ernst Rüdin, Arthur Gütt and the lawyer Falk Ruttke.

Abortion in Japan is allowed under a term limit of 22 weeks for endangerment to the health of the pregnant woman, economic hardship, or rape. Chapter XXIX of the Penal Code of Japan makes abortion de jure illegal in the country, but exceptions to the law are broad enough that it is widely accepted and practiced. Exceptions to the prohibition of abortion are regulated by the Maternal Health Protection Law that allows approved doctors to practice abortion on a woman if the pregnancy was the result of rape or if the continuation of the pregnancy endangers the maternal health because of physical or economic reasons. Anyone trying to practice abortion without the consent of the woman will be prosecuted, including the doctors. If a woman is married, consent from her spouse is also needed to approve abortions for socioeconomic reasons, although the rule doesn't apply if she is in a broken marriage, suffering abuse, or other domestic issues. Despite the partner's consent not being necessary for unmarried women and women who were impregnated by abusive partners or through rape, many doctors and medical institutions seek a signature from the man believed to have made the woman pregnant for fear of getting into legal trouble, rights advocates say.

Compulsory sterilization in Canada is an ongoing practice that has a documented history in the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hereditary Health Court</span>

The Hereditary Health Court, also known as the Genetic Health Court, was a court that decided whether people should be forcibly sterilized in Nazi Germany. That method of using courts to make decisions on hereditary health in Nazi Germany was created to implement the Nazi race policy aiming for racial hygiene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eugenics in the United States</span> "Race improvement" as historically sought in the US

Eugenics, the set of beliefs and practices which aims at improving the genetic quality of the human population, played a significant role in the history and culture of the United States from the late 19th century into the mid-20th century. The cause became increasingly promoted by intellectuals of the Progressive Era.

This disability rights timeline lists events outside the United States relating to the civil rights of people with disabilities, including court decisions, the passage of legislation, activists' actions, significant abuses of people with disabilities, and the founding of various organizations. Although the disability rights movement itself began in the 1960s, advocacy for the rights of people with disabilities started much earlier and continues to the present.

Geza von Hoffmann (1885–1921) was a prominent Austrian-Hungarian eugenicist and writer. He lived for a time in California as the Austrian Vice-Consulate where he observed and wrote on eugenics practices in the United States.

The history of eugenics is the study of development and advocacy of ideas related to eugenics around the world. Early eugenic ideas were discussed in Ancient Greece and Rome. The height of the modern eugenics movement came in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Sterilization of Latinas has been practiced in the United States on women of different Latin American identities, including those from Puerto Rico and Mexico. There is a significant history of such sterilization practices being conducted involuntarily, in a coerced or forced manner, as well as in more subtle forms such as that of constrained choice. Forced sterilization was permissible by multiple states throughout various periods in the 20th century. Issues of state sterilization have persisted as recently as September 2020. Some sources credit the practice to theories of racial eugenics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eugenic feminism</span> Areas of the womens suffrage movement which overlapped with eugenics

Eugenic feminism was a current of the women's suffrage movement which overlapped with eugenics. Originally coined by the Lebanese-British physician and vocal eugenicist Caleb Saleeby, the term has since been applied to summarize views held by prominent feminists of Great Britain and the United States. Some early suffragettes in Canada, especially a group known as The Famous Five, also pushed for various eugenic policies.

Eugenics was practiced in about 33 different states. Oregon was one of the many states that implemented eugenics programs and laws. This affected a number of different groups that were marginalized for being "unfit" and often were subject to forced sterilization.

The Brock Report or Report of the Departmental Committee on Sterilisation (1934) was a British Parliamentary report advocating for the sterilisation of disabled people.

References

  1. ↑ Otsubo S, Bartholomew JR (1998). "Eugenics in Japan: some ironies of modernity, 1883–1945". Sci Context. 11 (3–4): 545–65. doi:10.1017/s0269889700003203. PMID   15168677. S2CID   840243.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Robertson, Jennifer (2002). "Blood talks: Eugenic modernity and the creation of new Japanese" (PDF). Hist Anthropol Chur. 13 (3): 191–216. doi:10.1080/0275720022000025547. PMID   19499628. S2CID   41340161. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-12-09. Retrieved 2008-06-22.
  3. ↑ "The National Eugenic Law" The 107th law that Japanese Government promulgated in 1940　(国民優生法) 第一条　本法ハ悪質ナル遺伝性疾患ノ素質ヲ有スル者ノ増加ヲ防遏スルト共ニ健全ナル素質ヲ有スル者ノ増加ヲ図リ以テ国民素質ノ向上ヲ期スルコトヲ目的トス
  4. ↑ Rihito Kimura. "Jurisprudence in Genetics". Waseda University. Retrieved 2007-04-18.
  5. 1 2 Kiyoshi Hiroshima (October 1981). "Essay on the history of population policy in modern Japan (2): Population policy on quality and quantity in National Eugenic Law" (PDF). Jinko Mondai Kenkyu (in Japanese) (160): 61–77. PMID   12155095.
  6. ↑ 日本神道の革命. 大日本新思想学会. 1961.
  7. ↑ Hiroshima 1981, p. 73
  8. ↑ Otsubo, Sumiko (April 2005). "Between Two Worlds: Yamanouchi Shigeo and Eugenics in Early Twentieth-Century Japan". Annals of Science. 62 (2): 205–231. doi:10.1080/0003379031000091608. PMID   15789487. S2CID   5814798.
  9. ↑ Robertson 2002 , p. 192
  10. 1 2 3 Robertson 2002 , p. 196
  11. ↑ 中村 桂子・米本 昌平 「現代社会と遺伝学――第二世代に入る遺伝操作論争」 『世界』 March 1980
  12. 1 2 Robertson 2002 , p. 206
  13. ↑ Japanese Society of Health and Human Ecology - Outline of society Archived 2015-12-02 at the Wayback Machine (Japanese)
  14. ↑ Robertson 2002 , p. 205
  15. ↑ John W. Dower, War Without Mercy: Race & Power in the Pacific War p270 ISBN   0-394-50030-X
  16. ↑ "The Eugenic Protection Law" The 107th law that Japanese Government promulgated in 1940　(国民優生法) 第二条　本法ニ於テ優生手術ト称スルハ生殖ヲ不能ナラシムル手術又ハ処置ニシテ命令ヲ以テ定ムルモノヲ謂フ, http://www.res.otemon.ac.jp/~yamamoto/be/BE_law_04.htm Archived 2014-02-05 at the Wayback Machine
  17. ↑ "Times of change | The Japan Times Online".
  18. ↑ 優生問題を考える（四）──国民優生法と優生保護法 Archived 2006-12-30 at the Wayback Machine Matsubara Yoko - Research of Eugenics problem (Professor of Ritsumeikan University, researcher of Gender-blind and Eugenics.)
  19. ↑ 牧野千代蔵「断種法反対論」『優生学』第一五年四号［神国日本の歴史的秩序を尊重、断種法のような人為的介入は、人間を動物視するものだ] Makino Chiyozou "Opposite sterilization law" (1935) [It is necessary to esteem historical order of god country Japan. Artificial intervention like Eugenics is an act that considers man to be an animal.]
  20. ↑ 民族衛生(1946) Nagai Hisomu "敗因は科学の精神の閑却　民族衛生学の役割は重要　資質優れたものを前線に送りだしのに反して　劣弱なる素質者は，悠々結婚して，子供を産み得る点に於て，由々敷逆淘汰であり…"
  21. ↑ Saaler, Sven; Szpilman, Christopher W. A. (2011). Pan-Asianism: A Documentary History, Volume 2: 1920–Present. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 51. ISBN 978-0810895393.
  22. ↑ Herbert Bix, Hirohito and the making of modern Japan , 2001, p. 538, citing Kinkabara Samon and Takemae Eiji, Showashi : kokumin non naka no haran to gekido no hanseiki-zohoban, 1989, p.244.
  23. ↑ Gordon, Postwar Japan as History, pp.306
  24. ↑ Hovhannisyan, Astghik (2021). "Preventing the birth of 'inferior offspring': eugenic sterilizations in postwar Japan". Japan Forum. 33 (3): 383–401. doi:10.1080/09555803.2020.1731570. S2CID   216491427.
  25. 1 2 Sugimoto, An Introduction to Japanese Society, pp.167
  26. 1 2 3 Yonemoto, Shōhei (7 August 2018). "Forced Sterilizations in Japan: The Push for Justice". nippon.com. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
  27. ↑ Hurst, Daniel (18 March 2019). "Victims of forced sterilisation in Japan to receive compensation and apology". The Guardian. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
  28. ↑ "Former Hansen's disease patients shun return to society, survey shows". The Japan Times. May 2001. Archived from the original on 2008-03-19. Retrieved 2007-10-19.
  29. ↑ Victims of forced sterilisation in Japan to receive compensation and apology The Guardian. 2019.
  30. ↑ Japan court awards damages to victims of forced sterilisation for first time The Guardian. 2022.
  31. ↑ "Japan's top court says forced sterilisation unconstitutional". www.bbc.com.
  32. ↑ https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15330707#:~:text=The%20Eugenic%20Protection%20Law%20was,diseases%20could%20be%20forcibly%20sterilized. [ bare URL ]
  33. ↑ "Japan PM Kishida apologizes to plaintiffs in forced sterilization lawsuits | NHK WORLD-JAPAN News". NHK WORLD.
  34. ↑ Michio Miyasaka, A Historical and Ethical Analysis of Leprosy Control Policy in Japan, "Leprosy Control Policy in Japan". Archived from the original on 2011-11-13. Retrieved 2011-11-28.
  35. ↑ "Michio Miyasaka". Archived from the original on November 13, 2011.
  36. ↑ Korean Hansens patients seek redress, http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20040226a4.html
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.