List of nuclear weapons tests of North Korea

Last updated

Nuclear tests
Information
Country North Korea
Test site Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site, North Korea
Period2006–2017
Number of tests6
Test typeunderground
Max. yield

North Korea has conducted six nuclear tests, in 2006, 2009, 2013, twice in 2016, and in 2017.

Contents

List of nuclear weapons tests of North Korea
Invisible Square.svg
Invisible Square.svg
Mapscaleline.svg
2km
1.2miles
Black pog.svg
South
Black pog.svg
West
Black pog.svg
East
Black pog.svg
North portal
Red pog.svg
6
Red pog.svg
5
Red pog.svg
4
Red pog.svg
3
Red pog.svg
2
Red pog.svg
1
North Korea location map.svg
Red pog.svg
Location of North Korea's nuclear tests [5] [6]
1:  2006; 2:  2009; 3:  2013; 4:  2016-01; 5:  2016-09; 6:  2017;
V

Testing

North Korea's nuclear tests series tests and detonations
Sequence Date time (UT) Local time zone [note 1] [7] Location Elevation + height Delivery Yield [note 2] Fallout [note 3] References
(1) 9 October 2006 01:35:27 KST
(+9 hrs)
Punggye-ri Test Site, North Korea 41°17′06″N129°06′30″E / 41.28505°N 129.1084°E / 41.28505; 129.1084 ((1)) 1,340 m (4,400 ft), −310 m (−1,020 ft)underground 0.7–2  kt [8]
(2) 25 May 2009 00:54:43 KST
(+9 hrs)
Punggye-ri Test Site, North Korea 41°17′29″N129°04′54″E / 41.29142°N 129.08167°E / 41.29142; 129.08167 ((2)) 1,340 m (4,400 ft), −490 m (−1,610 ft)underground 2–5.4  kt [11] [12]
(3) 12 February 2013 02:57:51 KST
(+9 hrs)
Punggye-ri Test Site, North Korea 41°16′05″N129°04′51″E / 41.26809°N 129.08076°E / 41.26809; 129.08076 ((3)) 1,340 m (4,400 ft), −1,000 m (−3,300 ft)underground 6–16  kt [11] [13]
(4) 6 January 2016 01:30:01 PYT
(+8:30 hrs)
Punggye-ri Test Site, North Korea 41°18′32″N129°02′02″E / 41.30900°N 129.03399°E / 41.30900; 129.03399 ((4)) 1,340 m (4,400 ft), −1,000 m (−3,300 ft)underground 7–16.5  kt [15] [16]
(5) 9 September 2016 00:30:01 PYT
(+8:30 hrs)
Punggye-ri Test Site, North Korea 41°17′53″N129°00′54″E / 41.298°N 129.015°E / 41.298; 129.015 ((5)) [note 4] 1,340 m (4,400 ft), −1,000 m (−3,300 ft)underground 15–25  kt [19] [20] [21]
(6) 3 September 2017 03:30:01.940 PYT
(+8:30 hrs)
Punggye-ri Test Site, North Korea 41°20′35″N129°02′10″E / 41.343°N 129.036°E / 41.343; 129.036 ((2)) 1,340 m (4,400 ft), 0 m (0 ft)underground 70–280  kt [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30]
  1. To convert the UT time into standard local, add the number of hours in parentheses to the UT time; for local daylight saving time, add one additional hour. If the result is earlier than 00:00, add 24 hours and subtract 1 from the day; if it is 24:00 or later, subtract 24 hours and add 1 to the day. North Korea changed from UTC+9 hours to UTC+8:30 hours on 15 August 2015. All historical time zone data are derived from here:
  2. Estimated energy yield in tons, kilotons, and megatons. A ton of TNT equivalent is defined as 4.184 gigajoules (1 gigacalorie).
  3. Radioactive emission to the atmosphere aside from prompt neutrons, where known. The measured species is only iodine-131 if mentioned, otherwise it is all species. No entry means unknown, probably none if underground and "all" if not; otherwise notation for whether measured on the site only or off the site, where known, and the measured amount of radioactivity released.
  4. Location from seismic data, about 6.4 km west northwest Punggye-ri and locus of previous tests.

Summary

North Korea's nuclear testing series summary
Series or years Years covered Tests [Summ 1] Devices fired Devices with unknown yield Peaceful use tests Non-PTBT tests [Summ 2] Yield range (kilotons) [Summ 3] Total yield (kilotons) [Summ 4] Notes
nuclear tests2006–2017 660.7–250 197.8
Totals2006-Oct-9 to 2017-Sep-3 6 6 0.7–250 197.8 (Based on average yield from lower to upper estimates as the Government of DPRK does not announce the exact yield.) Total country yield is 0.036% of all nuclear testing.
  1. Includes all tests with potential for nuclear fission or fusion explosion, including combat use, singleton tests, salvo tests, zero yield fails, safety experiments, and bombs incapacitated by accidents but still intended to be fired. It does not include hydronuclear and subcritical tests, and misfires of a device which was subsequently fired successfully.
  2. Number of tests which would have been in violation of the Partial Test Ban Treaty of 1963, such as atmospheric, space or underwater tests. Some "peaceful use" cratering tests which should have been violations were protested, and later quietly dropped.
  3. "Small" refers to a value greater than zero but less than 0.5 kt.
  4. Some yields are described like "< 20 kt"; such are scored at one half of the numeric amount, i.e., yield of 10k in this example. "Unknown yield" adds nothing to the total.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Korea and weapons of mass destruction</span>

North Korea has a military nuclear weapons program and, as of 2024, is estimated to have an arsenal of approximately 50 nuclear weapons and sufficient production of fissile material for six to seven nuclear weapons per year. North Korea has also stockpiled a significant quantity of chemical and biological weapons. In 2003, North Korea withdrew from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Since 2006, the country has conducted six nuclear tests at increasing levels of expertise, prompting the imposition of sanctions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapons testing</span> Controlled detonation of nuclear weapons for scientific or political purposes

Nuclear weapons tests are experiments carried out to determine the performance, yield, and effects of nuclear weapons. Such tests have resulted until 2020 in up to 2.4 million people dying from its global fallout. Testing nuclear weapons offers practical information about how the weapons function, how detonations are affected by different conditions, and how personnel, structures, and equipment are affected when subjected to nuclear explosions. However, nuclear testing has often been used as an indicator of scientific and military strength. Many tests have been overtly political in their intention; most nuclear weapons states publicly declared their nuclear status through a nuclear test.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Greenhouse</span> Series of 1950s US nuclear tests

Operation Greenhouse was the fifth American nuclear test series, the second conducted in 1951 and the first to test principles that would lead to developing thermonuclear weapons. Conducted at the new Pacific Proving Ground, on islands of the Enewetak Atoll, it mounted the devices on large steel towers to simulate air bursts. This series of nuclear weapons tests was preceded by Operation Ranger and succeeded by Operation Buster-Jangle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Upshot–Knothole</span> Series of 1950s US nuclear tests

Operation Upshot–Knothole was a series of eleven nuclear test shots conducted in 1953 at the Nevada Test Site. It followed Operation Ivy and preceded Operation Castle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Teapot</span> Series of 1950s US nuclear tests

Operation Teapot was a series of 14 nuclear test explosions conducted at the Nevada Test Site in the first half of 1955. It was preceded by Operation Castle, and followed by Operation Wigwam. Wigwam was, administratively, a part of Teapot, but it is usually treated as a class of its own. The aims of the operation were to establish military tactics for ground forces on a nuclear battlefield and to improve the nuclear weapons used for strategic delivery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Plumbbob</span> Series of 1950s US nuclear tests

Operation Plumbbob was a series of nuclear tests that were conducted between May 28 and October 7, 1957, at the Nevada Test Site, following Project 57, and preceding Project 58/58A.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thermonuclear weapon</span> 2-stage nuclear weapon

A thermonuclear weapon, fusion weapon or hydrogen bomb (H bomb) is a second-generation nuclear weapon design. Its greater sophistication affords it vastly greater destructive power than first-generation nuclear bombs, a more compact size, a lower mass, or a combination of these benefits. Characteristics of nuclear fusion reactions make possible the use of non-fissile depleted uranium as the weapon's main fuel, thus allowing more efficient use of scarce fissile material such as uranium-235 or plutonium-239. The first full-scale thermonuclear test was carried out by the United States in 1952, and the concept has since been employed by most of the world's nuclear powers in the design of their weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Teller–Ulam design</span> History of technical design of modern hydrogen bombs

The Teller–Ulam design is a technical concept behind modern thermonuclear weapons, also known as hydrogen bombs. The design – the details of which are military secrets and known to only a handful of major nations – is believed to be used in virtually all modern nuclear weapons that make up the arsenals of the major nuclear powers.

The Treaty on the Limitation of Underground Nuclear Weapon Tests, also known as the Threshold Test Ban Treaty (TTBT), was signed in July 1974 by the United States and Soviet Union. It establishes a nuclear "threshold" by prohibiting nuclear tests of devices having a yield exceeding 150 kilotons after March 31, 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 North Korean nuclear test</span> 2006 test detonation of a nuclear weapon in North Korea

The 2006 North Korean nuclear test was the detonation of a nuclear device conducted by North Korea on October 9, 2006.

Wen Lianxing is a Chinese seismologist and geophysicist. He is a professor at Stony Brook University and the University of Science and Technology of China. He was awarded the James B. Macelwane Medal in 2003 and elected a fellow of the American Geophysical Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 North Korean nuclear test</span> 2009 nuclear detonation by North Korea

The 2009 North Korean nuclear test was the underground detonation of a nuclear device conducted on Monday, 25 May 2009 by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. This was its second nuclear test, the first test having taken place in October 2006. Following the nuclear test, Pyongyang also conducted several missile tests. A scientific paper later estimated the yield as 2.35 kilotons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2013 North Korean nuclear test</span> Test detonation on 12 February 2013

On 12 February 2013, North Korean state media announced it had conducted an underground nuclear test, its third in seven years. A tremor that exhibited a nuclear bomb signature with an initial magnitude 4.9 was detected by the China Earthquake Networks Center, Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization and the United States Geological Survey. In response, Japan summoned an emergency United Nations meeting for 12 February and South Korea raised its military alert status. It is not known whether the explosion was nuclear, or a conventional explosion designed to mimic a nuclear blast; as of two days after the blast, Chinese, Japanese, and South Korean investigators had failed to detect any radiation.

Sungjibaegam is a locality in Paegam County, Ryanggang Province in North Korea. It is associated with Paegam-rodongjagu. It is about 35 km south of Paegam Town, also part of the county.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site</span> North Korean nuclear test site

Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site was the only known nuclear test site of North Korea. Nuclear tests were conducted at the site in October 2006, May 2009, February 2013, January 2016, September 2016, and September 2017.

North Korea conducted its fourth nuclear detonation on 6 January 2016 at 10:00:01 UTC+08:30. At the Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site, approximately 50 kilometres northwest of Kilju City in Kilju County, an underground nuclear test was carried out. The United States Geological Survey reported a 5.1 magnitude earthquake from the location; the China Earthquake Networks Center reported the magnitude as 4.9.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">September 2016 North Korean nuclear test</span>

The government of North Korea conducted a nuclear detonation on 9 September 2016, the fifth since 2006, at the Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site, approximately 50 kilometres northwest of Kilju City in Kilju County.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2017 North Korean nuclear test</span>

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea conducted its sixth nuclear test on 3 September 2017, stating it had tested a thermonuclear weapon. The United States Geological Survey reported an earthquake of 6.3 magnitude not far from North Korea's Punggye-ri nuclear test site. South Korean authorities said the earthquake seemed to be artificial, consistent with an underground nuclear test. The USGS, as well as China Earthquake Networks Center, reported that the initial event was followed by a second, smaller, earthquake at the site, several minutes later, which was characterized as a collapse of the cavity formed by the initial detonation.

References

  1. 1 2 Panda, Ankit (6 September 2017). "US Intelligence: North Korea's Sixth Test Was a 140 Kiloton 'Advanced Nuclear' Device". The Diplomat. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
  2. 1 2 "North Korean nuke test put at 160 kilotons as Ishiba urges debate on deploying U.S. atomic bombs". The Japan Times . 5 September 2017. Archived from the original on 6 September 2017. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
  3. "North Korea's Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site: Satellite Imagery Shows Post-Test Effects and New Activity in Alternate Tunnel Portal Areas | 38 North: Informed Analysis of North Korea". 12 September 2017.
  4. 1 2 "The nuclear explosion in North Korea on 3 September 2017: A revised magnitude assessment". NORSAR. 12 September 2017. Archived from the original on 13 September 2017. Retrieved 13 September 2017.
  5. "Search Results". USGS.
  6. "North Korea's Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site: Analysis Reveals Its Potential for Additional Testing with Significantly Higher Yields". 38North. 10 March 2017.
  7. "Time Zone Database". iana.com. Retrieved 8 March 2014.
  8. USGS Earthquake Hazards Program (9 October 2006). "Magnitude 4.7–North Korea". USGS. Archived from the original on 27 April 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  9. 1 2 3 Nordkorea: BGR registriert vermutlichen Kernwaffentest – BGR (In German), 12 Feb 2013
  10. 1 2 3 4 Nordkorea: BGR registriert vermutlichen Kernwaffentest – BGR, 6 Jan 2016
  11. 1 2 Kalinowski, Martin (25 May 2009). "Second nuclear test conducted by North Korea on 25 May 2009" (PDF). Arms Control Wonk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 May 2009. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  12. USGS Earthquake Hazards Program (26 May 2009). "Magnitude 4.7–North Korea". USGS. Archived from the original on 28 May 2009. Retrieved 20 January 2014.
  13. Davenport, Kelsey (March 2013). "North Korea Conducts Nuclear Test". Arms Control Association. Retrieved 30 August 2014.
  14. "Chinese underground nuclear test North Korea reached an unprecedented precision measurement". 19 June 2013. Archived from the original on 21 October 2013. Retrieved 14 July 2013.
  15. "North Korean carries out fourth nuclear test". The Guardian . 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  16. "North Korea Tests Nuclear Device, Claims Successful Thermonuclear Detonation". The Diplomat . 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  17. 1 2 Nordkorea: BGR registriert vermutlichen Kernwaffentest – BGR (In German), 9 Sep 2016
  18. "North Korea's January 6 2016 Nuclear Test Location and Yield: Seismic Results from USTC". 6 January 2016. Archived from the original on 10 May 2017. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  19. "M5.3 Explosion – 19km ENE of Sungjibaegam, North Korea". United States Geological Survey. 9 September 2016. Retrieved 9 September 2016.
  20. "North Korea nuclear test: Japan confirms huge quake caused by explosion". The Guardian. 9 September 2016.
  21. North Korea conducts fifth and largest nuclear test – South Korea and Japan – Reuters, Sep 9, 2016 5:39am British Standard Time
  22. The Latest: N. Korea Confirms 'Successful' Nuclear Test – Associated Press, 2016 Sep 9, 12:52 AM EDT
  23. "North Korea has made a nuclear weapon small enough to fit on a missile. How worried should the world be?". Los Angeles Times. 9 August 2017. Retrieved 18 August 2017.
  24. "North Korea's September 9 2016 Nuclear Test Location and Yield: Seismic Results from USTC". 10 September 2016. Archived from the original on 19 September 2016. Retrieved 10 September 2016.
  25. 1 2 Michelle Ye Hee Lee (13 September 2017). "North Korea nuclear test may have been twice as strong as first thought". Washington Post. Retrieved 28 September 2017.
  26. "M 6.3 Explosion - 22km ENE of Sungjibaegam, North Korea".
  27. 1 2 "N. Korea's apparent sixth nuke test estimated to have yield of 100 kilotons: lawmaker".
  28. 1 2 "Large nuclear test in North Korea on 3 September 2017". Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  29. 1 2 "BGR registers a presumed nuclear test in North Korea".
  30. 1 2 "Seismic Detective Weighs In on North Korea's Latest Nuclear Test". 5 September 2017.
  31. Buckley, Chris (3 September 2017). "What's the Difference Between a Hydrogen Bomb and a Regular Atomic Bomb?". New York Times. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
  32. "North Korea nuclear test: what we know so far". Guardian. 3 September 2017.
  33. "The Latest: EU calls on U.N. to adopt further NK sanctions". New York Daily News. Associated Press. 3 September 2017. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  34. "North Korea tests most powerful nuclear bomb yet". ABC. CNN, Scripps National Desk. 3 September 2017. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  35. Wen, Philip (2 September 2017). "China Earthquake Administration detects 'suspected explosion' in North Korea". Reuters. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  36. "North Korea's 3 September 2017 Nuclear Test Location and Yield: Seismic Results from USTC". Lianxing Wen's Geography. University of Science and Technology of China. Archived from the original on 4 September 2017. Retrieved 4 September 2017.
  37. "North Korea likely to have conducted another nuclear test — Japanese TV". TASS. Government of Russia. 3 September 2017. Retrieved 3 September 2017.
  38. K M Sreejith; Ritesh Agrawal; A S Rajawat (January 2020). "Constraints on the location, depth and yield of the 2017 September 3 North Korean nuclear test from InSAR measurements and modelling". Geophysical Journal International. 220 (1). Oxford University Press: 345–351. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggz451 . Retrieved 15 November 2019.

Sources