January 2016 North Korean nuclear test

Last updated
January 2016 North Korea nuclear test
Information
Country North Korea
Test site 41°18′29″N129°02′56″E / 41.308°N 129.049°E / 41.308; 129.049 , [1] Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site, Kilju County
Period10:00:01,6 January 2016 (2016-01-06T10:00:01) UTC+08:30 (01:30:01 UTC) [1]
Number of tests1
Test typeUnderground
Device type Hydrogen according to the DPRK, fission according to the South Korean National Intelligence Service
Max. yield
Test chronology
January 2016 North Korean nuclear test
[Interactive fullscreen map + nearby articles]
Location of North Korea's Nuclear tests [5] [6]
1:  2006; 2:  2009; 3:  2013; 4:  2016-01; 5:  2016-09; 6:  2017;
V

North Korea conducted its fourth nuclear detonation on 6 January 2016 at 10:00:01 UTC+08:30. At the Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site, approximately 50 kilometres (30 miles) northwest of Kilju City in Kilju County, an underground nuclear test was carried out. The United States Geological Survey reported a 5.1 magnitude earthquake from the location; [7] the China Earthquake Networks Center reported the magnitude as 4.9.

Contents

North Korean media announced that the country had successfully tested a hydrogen bomb in ″self-defence against US″. [8] However, third-party experts as well as officials and agencies in South Korea questioned North Korea's claims and contend that the device was more likely to have been a fission bomb such as a boosted fission weapon. Such weapons use hydrogen fusion to produce smaller, lighter warheads suitable for arming a delivery device such as a missile, rather than to attain the destructive power of a true hydrogen bomb. [9]

Background

North Korea had previously conducted three underground nuclear tests in 2006, 2009, and 2013, drawing sanctions from the United Nations Security Council. [10] [11] [12]

The presidents of the United States and South Korea urged North Korea to rejoin the six-party talks in October 2015. The presidents also warned North Korea against a fourth nuclear test. [13]

In December 2015 North Korean supreme leader Kim Jong Un suggested that the country had the capacity to launch a hydrogen bomb, a device of considerably more power than conventional atomic bombs used in previous tests. [14] The remark was met with skepticism from the White House and South Korean officials. [15] Around this time, the country approached the United States about possible peace talks to end the Korean War. [16]

In a New Year's Day speech, Kim Jong Un warned that provocation from "invasive outsiders" would be met with a "holy war of justice". [17]

North Korean claims

Order to prepare the test signed by Kim Jong Un on 15 December 2015, the month before the test Kim Jong-un's initial order on H-bomb test.jpg
Order to prepare the test signed by Kim Jong Un on 15 December 2015, the month before the test

The North Korean government described the test as a "complete success" [11] and characterized it as self-defense against the United States. [10] North Korean media claimed that the bomb was made the month before the test was carried out. [18]

Official state media from the DPRK announced the test. The Korean Central Television (KCTV) said that "the U.S. has gathered forces hostile to [the] DPRK and raised a slanderous human rights issue to hinder [the] DPRK's improvement. It is [therefore] just to have [an] H-bomb as self-defense against the U.S. having numerous and humongous nuclear weapons. The DPRK's fate must not be protected by any forces but [the] DPRK itself". [19]

Ri Chun-hee, the television news anchor who announced the deaths of Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il, emerged from retirement to announce the H-bomb test to both the domestic and international audience. [20]

Skepticism of the hydrogen bomb claim

The earthquake caused by the 2016 nuclear test was 5.1 magnitude, [10] [21] similar to the 5.1-magnitude earthquake that accompanied North Korea's previous 2013 nuclear test (which was estimated by South Korea to have a yield of 6–9 kilotons of TNT and Russian estimates of more than 7 kilotons of TNT). [22] [23]

Won-Young Kim at the Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory explained it "was more powerful than North Korea's previous nuclear test" and added that it is difficult to quantify "the exact size of North Korea's nuclear detonations because the depth of the explosive device, properties of the rock surrounding the explosion and other factors influence the seismic measurements produced" because North Korea does not publicize the depth of its tests, although the material at the Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site is thought to be hard granite. [24]

The tremors were felt in Changbai, Hunchun and Yanji in Jilin province in China. [25] China Central Television released photos of students being evacuated in the area and stated that the ground at a local high school showed cracks. [25] According to China's Foreign Ministry, Beijing had no advance knowledge of the test. [25]

Although North Korea declared that the 2016 test was a "successful" demonstration of a hydrogen bomb, international experts and members of the South Korean government expressed skepticism because the explosion was too small; rather, the test may have involved only a boosted fission weapon. [13] [26]

Andre Gsponer of the Independent Scientific Research Institute at the University of Oxford said this technology has "a number of significant technical and military advantages, which explain why it is used in essentially all militarized nuclear weapons, including in India, Pakistan, and North Korea". Quick estimates of the impact of such a weapon "detonated 1,000 meters over downtown Seoul would produce 78,000 fatalities and somewhere around 270,000 estimated injuries", according to Ryan Faith of ViceNews. [27] Analyst Zack Beauchamp of Vox points out that yield and technology in this test "won't fundamentally change the status quo in the Korean peninsula and it would be more a change in degree than in kind in military terms". [28]

Bruce W. Bennett, a senior defense analyst of the RAND Corporation research organization, is also skeptical, telling BBC News that "the bang they should have gotten would have been 10 times greater… So Kim Jong-un is either lying, saying they did a hydrogen test when they didn't, they just used a little bit more efficient fission weapon – or the hydrogen part of the test really didn't work very well, or the fission part didn't work very well." [29] After considering the seismic data which suggests a 6–9 kiloton yield, other U.S. analysts also do not believe that a hydrogen bomb was detonated. "What we're speculating is they tried to do a boosted nuclear device, which is an atomic bomb that has a little bit of hydrogen, an isotope in it called tritium," said Joseph Cirincione, president of the global security firm Ploughshares Fund. [30]

On the other hand, John Carlson, a member of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission and former head of the Australian Safeguards and Non-Proliferation Office declared previous North Korean tests were purely a primary stage, that is, a nuclear explosion, "and fairly low yield at that". However, in the case of this test, he added that "if it's true, it means they have made something (of a) smaller scale, capable of being put on to a missile" and that North Korea would be aiming to develop a weapon "small enough and light enough to put on to a missile, and the usual parameters are something less than one meter in diameter, and less than a tonne in weight".

Admiral Bill Gortney, head of US Northern Command and the North American Aerospace Defense Command, said in October 2015 he believed North Korea had rockets with enough range to hit the continental US and added that "the secretive state had already developed 'miniaturised' nuclear bombs that could be fitted to these rockets". [31] [32] David Albright, former United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency nuclear inspector, on the contrary, thinks Pyongyang can miniaturize a warhead for shorter-range missiles, but not yet for intercontinental ballistic missiles, or ICBMs. [33]

There is a clear distinction between first- and second-generation nuclear weapons, i.e. atomic and hydrogen bombs. However, virtually all second generation bombs use a few grams of deuterium-tritium gas to ensure the reliability and safety of the nuclear fission-explosives. They can then be used on their own as boosted fission bombs or as primaries of two-stage thermonuclear (hydrogen) weapons. Weapons which in contemporary arsenals do not use tritium boosting have a generally lower kiloton yield and are mostly weapons used for specific purposes such as atomic demolition munitions. Tritium boosting is relatively easy to implement and has advantages in yield, weight, size, safety (zero or negligible yield when the tritium is not in the weapon), resistance to spontaneous fission caused by other warheads and high transparency to X-rays. [34]

Jeffrey Lewis, expert at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies, said that a boosted fission weapon is "the most likely scenario in my view, with a failed thermonuclear test a close second". [27]

International reactions

The test was condemned by several governments who called on the United Nations to strengthen its sanctions against North Korea. [35] United Nations Security Council Resolution 2270 was subsequently passed to that effect.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Korea and weapons of mass destruction</span>

North Korea has a military nuclear weapons program and, as of early 2020, is estimated to have an arsenal of approximately 30 to 40 nuclear weapons and sufficient production of fissile material for six to seven nuclear weapons per year. North Korea has also stockpiled a significant quantity of chemical and biological weapons. In 2003, North Korea withdrew from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). Since 2006, the country has conducted six nuclear tests at increasing levels of expertise, prompting the imposition of sanctions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapon design</span> Process by which nuclear WMDs are designed and produced

Nuclear weapon designs are physical, chemical, and engineering arrangements that cause the physics package of a nuclear weapon to detonate. There are three existing basic design types:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation Greenhouse</span> Series of 1950s US nuclear tests

Operation Greenhouse was the fifth American nuclear test series, the second conducted in 1951 and the first to test principles that would lead to developing thermonuclear weapons. Conducted at the new Pacific Proving Ground, on islands of the Enewetak Atoll, it mounted the devices on large steel towers to simulate air bursts. This series of nuclear weapons tests was preceded by Operation Ranger and succeeded by Operation Buster-Jangle.

RDS-6s was the first Soviet test of a thermonuclear weapon that occurred on August 12, 1953, that detonated with a force equivalent to 400 kilotons of TNT.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boosted fission weapon</span> Type of nuclear weapon

A boosted fission weapon usually refers to a type of nuclear bomb that uses a small amount of fusion fuel to increase the rate, and thus yield, of a fission reaction. The neutrons released by the fusion reactions add to the neutrons released due to fission, allowing for more neutron-induced fission reactions to take place. The rate of fission is thereby greatly increased such that much more of the fissile material is able to undergo fission before the core explosively disassembles. The fusion process itself adds only a small amount of energy to the process, perhaps 1%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thermonuclear weapon</span> 2-stage nuclear weapon

A thermonuclear weapon, fusion weapon or hydrogen bomb (H bomb) is a second-generation nuclear weapon design. Its greater sophistication affords it vastly greater destructive power than first-generation nuclear bombs, a more compact size, a lower mass, or a combination of these benefits. Characteristics of nuclear fusion reactions make possible the use of non-fissile depleted uranium as the weapon's main fuel, thus allowing more efficient use of scarce fissile material such as uranium-235 or plutonium-239. The first full-scale thermonuclear test was carried out by the United States in 1952; the concept has since been employed by most of the world's nuclear powers in the design of their weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Teller–Ulam design</span> History of Technical design of modern hydrogen bombs

The Teller–Ulam design is a technical concept behind modern thermonuclear weapons, also known as hydrogen bombs. The design – the details of which are military secrets and known to only a handful of major nations – is believed to be used in virtually all modern nuclear weapons that make up the arsenals of the major nuclear powers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse Item</span>

Greenhouse-Item was an American nuclear test conducted on May 25, 1951, as part of Operation Greenhouse at the Pacific Proving Ground, specifically on the island of Engebi in the Eniwetok Atoll in the Central Pacific Ocean. This test explosion was the first test of a boosted fission weapon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 North Korean nuclear test</span> 2006 test detonation of a nuclear weapon in North Korea

The 2006 North Korean nuclear test was the detonation of a nuclear device conducted by North Korea on October 9, 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orange Herald</span> British nuclear weapons

Orange Herald was a British nuclear weapon, tested on 31 May 1957. At the time it was reported as an H-bomb, although in fact it was a large boosted fission weapon and remains to date, the largest fission device ever detonated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of the North Korean nuclear program</span> Chronology of the North Korean nuclear program

This chronology of the North Korean nuclear program has its roots in the 1950s and begins in earnest in 1989 with the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the main economic ally of North Korea. The chronology mainly addresses the conflict between the United States and North Korea, while including the influences of the other members of the six-party talks: China, Russia, South Korea, and Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fizzle (nuclear explosion)</span> Nuclear explosion with less than expected yield

A fizzle occurs when the detonation of a device for creating a nuclear explosion grossly fails to meet its expected yield. The bombs still detonate, but the detonation is much less than anticipated. The cause(s) for the failure can be linked to improper design, poor construction, or lack of expertise. All countries that have had a nuclear weapons testing program have experienced some fizzles. A fizzle can spread radioactive material throughout the surrounding area, involve a partial fission reaction of the fissile material, or both. For practical purposes, a fizzle can still have considerable explosive yield when compared to conventional weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 North Korean nuclear test</span> 2009 nuclear detonation by North Korea

The 2009 North Korean nuclear test was the underground detonation of a nuclear device conducted on Monday, 25 May 2009 by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. This was its second nuclear test, the first test having taken place in October 2006. Following the nuclear test, Pyongyang also conducted several missile tests. A scientific paper later estimated the yield as 2.35 kilotons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2013 North Korean nuclear test</span> Test detonation on 12 February 2013

On 12 February 2013, North Korean state media announced it had conducted an underground nuclear test, its third in seven years. A tremor that exhibited a nuclear bomb signature with an initial magnitude 4.9 was detected by the China Earthquake Networks Center, Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization and the United States Geological Survey. In response, Japan summoned an emergency United Nations meeting for 12 February and South Korea raised its military alert status. It is not known whether the explosion was nuclear, or a conventional explosion designed to mimic a nuclear blast; as of two days after the blast, Chinese, Japanese, and South Korean investigators had failed to detect any radiation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site</span> North Korean nuclear test site

Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site was the only known nuclear test site of North Korea. Nuclear tests were conducted at the site in October 2006, May 2009, February 2013, January 2016, September 2016, and September 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">September 2016 North Korean nuclear test</span>

The government of North Korea conducted a nuclear detonation on 9 September 2016, the fifth since 2006, at the Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site, approximately 50 kilometres northwest of Kilju City in Kilju County.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2017 North Korean nuclear test</span>

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea conducted its sixth nuclear test on 3 September 2017, stating it had tested a thermonuclear weapon. The United States Geological Survey reported an earthquake of 6.3-magnitude not far from North Korea's Punggye-ri nuclear test site. South Korean authorities said the earthquake seemed to be artificial, consistent with an underground nuclear test. The USGS, as well as China Earthquake Networks Center, reported that the initial event was followed by a second, smaller, earthquake at the site, several minutes later, which was characterized as a collapse of the cavity formed by the initial detonation.

References

  1. 1 2 "M5.1 Nuclear Explosion – 22 km ENE of Sungjibaegam, North Korea". United States Geological Survey. 6 January 2016. Archived from the original on 7 January 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  2. ↑ Nordkorea: BGR registriert vermutlichen Kernwaffentest – BGR (In German), 9 Sep 2016
  3. ↑ Nordkorea: BGR registriert vermutlichen Kernwaffentest – BGR, 6 Jan 2016
  4. ↑ "温联星研究组". Archived from the original on 19 September 2016.
  5. ↑ "Search Results". USGS.
  6. ↑ "North Korea's Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Site: Analysis Reveals Its Potential for Additional Testing with Significantly Higher Yields". 38North. 10 March 2017.
  7. ↑ "USGS M0+ earthquakes in North Korea, 2016". earthquake.usgs.gov. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
  8. ↑ North Korea claims successful hydrogen bomb test in 'self-defence against US' The Guardian, 6 January 2016.
  9. ↑ Declan Butler; Elizabeth Gibney (8 January 2016). "What kind of bomb did North Korea detonate?". nature. Retrieved 22 July 2020.
  10. 1 2 3 "North Korean carries out fourth nuclear test". The Guardian . 6 January 2016. Archived from the original on 16 June 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  11. 1 2 Sanger, David E.; Sang-hun, Choe (5 January 2016). "North Korea Announces That It Has Detonated First Hydrogen Bomb". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  12. ↑ "Chronology of major events leading to N. Korea's H-bomb test". Yonhap. 6 January 2016. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  13. 1 2 Sang-hung, Choe (6 January 2016). "North Korea Claims It Tested Hydrogen Bomb but Is Doubted". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  14. ↑ "North Korea has a hydrogen bomb, says Kim Jong-un". The Guardian. Reuters. 10 December 2015. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  15. ↑ Sang-hun, Choe (10 December 2015). "Kim Jong-Un's Claim of North Korea Hydrogen Bomb Draws Skepticism". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 9 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  16. ↑ Cassella, Megan; Chiacu, Doina (21 February 2016). "U.S. rejected North Korea peace talks offer before last nuclear test: State Department". Reuters . Archived from the original on 22 February 2016. Retrieved 22 February 2016.
  17. ↑ "North Korea's Kim Says He Is Ready For War". Sky News . 1 January 2016. Archived from the original on 4 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  18. ↑ "DPRK Proves Successful in H-bomb Test". Pyongyang: Korean Central News Agency. 6 January 2016.
  19. ↑ "North Korea says it tested hydrogen bomb Archived 6 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine " NK News. 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  20. ↑ "Famed N. Korean newscaster comes out of retirement to anchor story on purported H-bomb detonation". Women in the World in Association with The New York Times – WITW. 6 January 2016. Archived from the original on 16 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  21. ↑ "朝鲜M4.9地震(疑爆)". China Earthquake Data Center (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 26 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  22. ↑ Choi, He-suk (14 February 2013). "Estimates differ on size of N.K. blast". The Korea Herald. Archived from the original on 16 February 2013. Retrieved 17 February 2013.
  23. ↑ "M5.1 – 24 km ENE of Sungjibaegam, North Korea". USGS. 12 February 2013. Archived from the original on 13 February 2013. Retrieved 12 February 2013.
  24. ↑ "Nuclear Confusion: The Data Suggest North Korea's "H–Bomb" Isn't". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 8 January 2016. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  25. 1 2 3 "North Korea Tests China With Nuclear Claim". The Wall Street Journal. 6 January 2016. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  26. ↑ McCurry, Justin; Safi, Michael (6 January 2016). "North Korea claims successful hydrogen bomb test in 'self-defence against US'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016.
  27. 1 2 "Yes, North Korea Probably Tested an H-Bomb — Just Not the Kind You're Thinking Of". VICE News. 6 January 2016. Archived from the original on 29 January 2016. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  28. ↑ "North Korea says it just tested a hydrogen bomb. Here's what we know". Vox. 6 January 2016. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
  29. ↑ "North Korea nuclear H-bomb claims met by scepticism". BBC News Asia. BBC. 6 January 2016. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  30. ↑ Windrem, Robert. "North Korea Likely Lying About Hydrogen Bomb Test, Experts Say". NBC News. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 6 January 2016.
  31. ↑ Safi, Michael (6 January 2016). "North Korea test: what is a miniaturised hydrogen bomb?". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  32. ↑ "North Korea could hit US homeland with nuclear weapon, says top admiral". the Guardian. 8 October 2015. Archived from the original on 7 January 2016. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  33. ↑ "North Korea H-bomb test: 7 key questions answered". CNN. Retrieved 7 January 2016.
  34. ↑ Gsponer, Andre (2 February 2008). "Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons: Military effectiveness and collateral effects". arXiv: physics/0510071 .
  35. ↑ "N Korean nuclear test condemned as intolerable provocation". Channel News Asia. Mediacorp. 6 January 2016. Archived from the original on 7 January 2016. Retrieved 3 December 2017.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.