Masagana 99

Last updated

Masagana 99 was an agricultural program of then Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos to increase rice production among Filipino farmers. The program was launched in 1973 at a time the country was experiencing a rice supply shortage. By promoting high yield varieties, chemical fertilizers, and herbicides, [1] the program initially allowed the Philippines to attain self-sufficiency in 1975–1976, and export rice to its neighboring Asian countries in 1977–1978. By 1980, however, problems with the credit scheme rendered the loans accessible only to rich landowners while leaving poor farmers in debt. [2] The program was also noted to have become a vehicle of political patronage. [3] [4] [5]

Contents

By 1984, the Marcos administration shifted its focus away from Masagana 99 and towards different programs. [4] [6]

Etymology

"Masagana" is a Filipino term for "bountiful" [7] while 99 refers to the number of sacks of rice targeted as the yield per hectare of land in every harvest season. [8]

Concept development

Masagana 99 was conceived by the administration of then Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos [7] as way to cope with a nationwide rice shortage arising from the various natural disasters and pest inverstations in 1972. [4]

Launched on May 21, 1973, its goal was to promote Philippine rice self-sufficiency by raising the Philippines' average palay crop yield from 40 cavans (a unit of measure equivalent to 60 kilograms of rice) per hectare to 99 cavans per hectare. The program planned to achieve this by pushing farmers to use newly developed technologies including high-yielding variety (HYV) seeds, low-cost fertilizer, and herbicides. [4]

The program included a supervised credit scheme, which was supposed to provide farmers with the funds needed to pay for the program's technology package. The Central Bank designed subsidized rediscounting facilities for public and private credit institutions throughout the country, encouraging them to give loans to farmers without collateral or other usual borrowing requirements. [4]

Initial success

The program achieved initial success by encouraging farmers to plant new "Miracle Rice" (IR8) variety of rice which the International Rice Research Institute had been developing since 1962, during the administration of President Carlos P. Garcia. [9]

The program was launched at the time the country was experiencing a shortage of supply on rice and was credited for the launching of the Philippine Green Revolution in 1973 which allowed the country to export rice to other Asian countries. [8] The highlights of its short-lived success happened when the Philippines finally attained self-sufficiency in 1975–1976, and was able to export rice to its neighbors in Asia in 1977–1978. But costly subsidies and failure of many farmers-borrowers to repay the loans led to the program benefiting only 3.7% of the country's small rice farmers by 1980. [10] [4]

Problems with the credit scheme

Economists [2] generally acknowledge Masagana 99 to have failed because the supervised credit scheme it offered to farmers proved unsustainable. [2] The program is said to have catered to rich landowners and has been criticized for leaving poor farmers in debt [2] and for having become a vehicle of political patronage. [3] [4] [5] The program is also said to have benefited big agribusiness and transnational corporations to the detriment of the welfare of peasants. [11]

Negative environmental impact

Aside from the problems of its credit scheme, however, Masagana also had a negative impact on the environment and on traditional agricultural methods. Masagana 99's package of technological interventions in the form of synthetic fertilizers, herbicides, pesticides, and other chemicals imported from other countries. [1] This resulted in the devastation of indigenous plants and animals, and the eradication of certain pest species only led to the dominance of other pests. [4] [ additional citation(s) needed ]

The use of chemicals also depleted the groundwater and saturated rice lands with chemicals, which would eventually lead to lower rice yields. [11] Some farmers also suffered diseases from exposure to pesticides. [11]

Masagana 99 was responsible for convincing the majority of the Philippines' irrigated rice farmers to adopt the use of chemical fertilizers. [12] [ additional citation(s) needed ] [11] It also led the Bureau of Plant Industry to focus on chemical fertilizers to eliminate pests such as the rice stemborer because pesticides were cheaper - abandoning a pre-existing Integrated Pest Management approach which used Trichogramma to control stemborer populations. [12]

Discontinuation

National Scientist and former University of the Philippines President Emil Q. Javier notes that by 1980, "Masagana 99 ceased to be of consequence as only 3.7 percent of the small rice farmers were able to borrow." [10] By 1981, the program's problems were apparent enough that Southeast Asian news outlets noted that Masagana 99 and its aquaculture equivalent, Biyayang Dagat, were lacking in funds due to low loan repayment rates. [4] By 1984, the Marcos administration shifted its focus away from Masagana 99 and towards a new program, the Intensified Rice Production Program (IRPP), which like Masagana 99 succeeded in temporarily increasing rice production, but ultimately left its beneficiary-farmers in debt. [4] [6]

Aftermath

According to Carlos Dominguez III who was the agriculture secretary under the administration of President Corazon Aquino, the successor of Marcos, from 1987 to 1989, the program caused about 800 rural banks to go bankrupt, never boosted rice production sufficiently for the country to be able to export rice, [13] and left poor farmers in debt, because the program was used as a vehicle for political patronage.

Proposed revival

President Rodrigo Duterte expressed his interest to revive the program in October 2016. [8] The plan met opposition from MASIPAG, a group of farmers and scientists, saying that revival of the program will bring back issues such as debt, replacement of traditional varieties with newer ones, and the promotion of pesticide use which they said will harm animals, farmers, and crops and insisted that only large firms benefited from the program. The Department of Agriculture noted that the old variety used in the Masagana 99 program is already phased out and the Masagana 99 can use newer varieties of rice and insisted that environmentally friendly pesticides will be promoted under the potentially revived Masagana 99. [7]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green Revolution</span> Agricultural developments in 1950s–1960s

The Green Revolution, or the Third Agricultural Revolution, was a period of technology transfer initiatives that saw greatly increased crop yields. These changes in agriculture began in developed countries in the early 20th century and spread globally until the late 1980s. In the late 1960s, farmers began incorporating new technologies such as high-yielding varieties of cereals, particularly dwarf wheat and rice, and the widespread use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and controlled irrigation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organic farming</span> Method of agriculture meant to be environmentally friendly

Organic farming, also known as ecological farming or biological farming, is an agricultural system that uses fertilizers of organic origin such as compost manure, green manure, and bone meal and places emphasis on techniques such as crop rotation and companion planting. It originated early in the 20th century in reaction to rapidly changing farming practices. Certified organic agriculture accounts for 70 million hectares globally, with over half of that total in Australia. Biological pest control, mixed cropping, and the fostering of insect predators are encouraged. Organic standards are designed to allow the use of naturally-occurring substances while prohibiting or strictly limiting synthetic substances. For instance, naturally-occurring pesticides such as pyrethrin are permitted, while synthetic fertilizers and pesticides are generally prohibited. Synthetic substances that are allowed include, for example, copper sulfate, elemental sulfur, and veterinary drugs. Genetically modified organisms, nanomaterials, human sewage sludge, plant growth regulators, hormones, and antibiotic use in livestock husbandry are prohibited. Organic farming advocates claim advantages in sustainability, openness, self-sufficiency, autonomy and independence, health, food security, and food safety.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intensive farming</span> Branch of agriculture

Intensive agriculture, also known as intensive farming, conventional, or industrial agriculture, is a type of agriculture, both of crop plants and of animals, with higher levels of input and output per unit of agricultural land area. It is characterized by a low fallow ratio, higher use of inputs such as capital, labour, agrochemicals and water, and higher crop yields per unit land area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Integrated pest management</span> Approach for economic control of pests

Integrated pest management (IPM), also known as integrated pest control (IPC) that integrates both chemical and non-chemical practices for economic control of pests. The UN's Food and Agriculture Organization defines IPM as "the careful consideration of all available pest control techniques and subsequent integration of appropriate measures that discourage the development of pest populations and keep pesticides and other interventions to levels that are economically justified and reduce or minimize risks to human health and the environment. IPM emphasizes the growth of a healthy crop with the least possible disruption to agro-ecosystems and encourages natural pest control mechanisms." Entomologists and ecologists have urged the adoption of IPM pest control since the 1970s. IPM is a safer pest control framework than reliance on the use of chemical pesticides, mitigating risks such as: insecticide-induced resurgence, pesticide resistance and (especially food) crop residues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polyculture</span> Growing multiple crops together in agriculture

In agriculture, polyculture is the practice of growing more than one crop species together in the same place at the same time, in contrast to monoculture, which had become the dominant approach in developed countries by 1950. Traditional examples include the intercropping of the Three Sisters, namely maize, beans, and squashes, by indigenous peoples of Central and North America, the rice-fish systems of Asia, and the complex mixed cropping systems of Nigeria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agrochemical</span> Any chemical used in agriculture

An agrochemical or agrichemical, a contraction of agricultural chemical, is a chemical product used in industrial agriculture. Agrichemical refers to biocides and synthetic fertilizers. It may also include hormones and other chemical growth agents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Push–pull agricultural pest management</span> Intercropping strategy for controlling agricultural pests

Push–pull technology is an intercropping strategy for controlling agricultural pests by using repellent "push" plants and trap "pull" plants. For example, cereal crops like maize or sorghum are often infested by stem borers. Grasses planted around the perimeter of the crop attract and trap the pests, whereas other plants, like Desmodium, planted between the rows of maize, repel the pests and control the parasitic plant Striga. Push–pull technology was developed at the International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) in Kenya in collaboration with Rothamsted Research, UK. and national partners. This technology has been taught to smallholder farmers through collaborations with universities, NGOs and national research organizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organic cotton</span> Cotton grown organically from non-GM plants

Organic cotton is generally defined as cotton that is grown organically in subtropical countries such as India, Turkey, China, and parts of the USA from non-genetically modified plants, and without the use of any synthetic agricultural chemicals such as fertilizers or pesticides aside from the ones allowed by the certified organic labeling. Its production is supposed to promote and enhance biodiversity and biological cycles. In the United States, cotton plantations must also meet the requirements enforced by the National Organic Program (NOP) from the USDA in order to be considered organic. This institution determines the allowed practices for pest control, growing, fertilizing, and handling of organic crops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Food Authority (Philippines)</span> Philippines government agency

The Philippines' National Food Authority, is an agency of the Philippine government under the Department of Agriculture responsible for ensuring the food security of the Philippines and the stability of supply and price of rice, the Philippines' staple grain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority</span>

The Philippines' Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority, is a technical regulatory agency under the Department of Agriculture. The agency is responsible for assuring adequate supply of fertilizer and pesticide at reasonable prices; rationalizing the manufacture and marketing of fertilizer; protecting the public from the risks of the inherent use of pesticides; and educating the agricultural sector in the use of these inputs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Industrial agriculture</span> Form of modern industrialized farming

Industrial agriculture is a form of modern farming that refers to the industrialized production of crops and animals and animal products like eggs or milk. The methods of industrial agriculture include innovation in agricultural machinery and farming methods, genetic technology, techniques for achieving economies of scale in production, the creation of new markets for consumption, the application of patent protection to genetic information, and global trade. These methods are widespread in developed nations and increasingly prevalent worldwide. Most of the meat, dairy, eggs, fruits and vegetables available in supermarkets are produced in this way.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intensive crop farming</span> Modern form of farming

Intensive crop farming is a modern industrialized form of crop farming. Intensive crop farming's methods include innovation in agricultural machinery, farming methods, genetic engineering technology, techniques for achieving economies of scale in production, the creation of new markets for consumption, patent protection of genetic information, and global trade. These methods are widespread in developed nations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green Revolution in India</span> Modernization of agriculture in India

The Green Revolution was a period that began in the 1960s during which agriculture in India was converted into a modern industrial system by the adoption of technology, such as the use of high yielding variety (HYV) seeds, mechanized farm tools, irrigation facilities, pesticides, and fertilizers. Mainly led by agricultural scientist M. S. Swaminathan in India, this period was part of the larger Green Revolution endeavor initiated by Norman Borlaug, which leveraged agricultural research and technology to increase agricultural productivity in the developing world. Varieties or strains of crops can be selected by breeding for various useful characteristics such as disease resistance, response to fertilizers, product quality and high yields.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agriculture in the Philippines</span>

Agriculture in the Philippines is a major sector of the economy, ranking third among the sectors in 2022 behind only Services and Industry. Its outputs include staples like rice and corn, but also export crops such as coffee, cavendish banana, pineapple and pineapple products, coconut, sugar, and mango. The sector continues to face challenges, however, due to the pressures of a growing population. As of 2022, the sector employs 24% of the Filipino workforce and it accounted for 8.9% of the total GDP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rice production in Indonesia</span> Agricultural statistics in Indonesia

Rice production in Indonesia is an important part of the national economy. Indonesia is the third-largest producer of rice in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rice production in China</span>

Rice production in China is the amount of rice planted, grown, and harvested for consumption in the mainland of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rice production in the Philippines</span> Overview of rice production in the Philippines

In the Philippines, rice production is an important aspect of the country's food supply and economy. The Philippines is the 8th-largest rice producer in the world, accounting for 2.8% of global rice production. The Philippines was also the world's largest rice importer in 2010. There are an estimated 2.4 million rice farmers in the Philippines as of 2020.

<i>Striga hermonthica</i> Species of flowering plant

Striga hermonthica, commonly known as purple witchweed or giant witchweed, is a hemiparasitic plant that belongs to the family Orobanchaceae. It is devastating to major crops such as sorghum and rice. In sub-Saharan Africa, apart from sorghum and rice, it also infests maize, pearl millet, and sugar cane.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic history of the Philippines (1965–1986)</span>

The 21-year period of Philippine economic history during Ferdinand Marcos’ regime – from his election in 1965 until he was ousted by the People Power Revolution in 1986 – was a period of significant economic lows.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rice-fish system</span> Agricultural system

A rice-fish system is a rice polyculture, a practice that integrates rice agriculture with aquaculture, most commonly with freshwater fish. It is based on a mutually beneficial relationship between rice and fish in the same agroecosystem. The system was recognized by the FAO in 2002 as one of the first Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems.

References

  1. 1 2 BAUTISTA, VICTORIA A. (1983). "Public-Interest Perspective: A Neglected Dimension in the Study of Corruption". Philippine Sociological Review. 31 (3/4): 45–53. ISSN   0031-7810. JSTOR   23898197.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Esguerra, E.F. (1980). "Some notes on the Masagana 99 [rice] program and small farmer access to credit [Philippines]". Philippine Sociological Review (Philippines). Retrieved 19 September 2017.
  3. 1 2 Davidson, Jamie S. (2016-01-02). "Why the Philippines Chooses to Import Rice". Critical Asian Studies. 48 (1): 100–122. doi:10.1080/14672715.2015.1129184. ISSN   1467-2715. S2CID   155783676.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Reyes, Miguel Paolo P.; Ariate, Joel F. Jr.; Del Mundo, Lara Vinda. "'Success' of Masagana 99 all in Imee's head - UP researchers". Vera Files. Archived from the original on 2020-05-24. Retrieved 2020-05-24.
  5. 1 2 Tadem, Eduardo C. (2015-09-02). "Marcoses should apologize to Filipino farmers". Inquirer. Retrieved 2021-11-02.
  6. 1 2 Caña, Paul John (2020-05-23). "What Was the Masagana 99 Program and Why Do Some People Want it Back?". Esquire. Retrieved 2021-11-02.
  7. 1 2 3 Magsaysay, Bettina (27 October 2016). "Farmers oppose revival of Marcos' 'Masagana 99'". ABS-CBN News (in English and Filipino). Retrieved 19 September 2017.
  8. 1 2 3 Nilles, Giovanni (24 October 2016). "Return of FM's Masagana 99, Biyayang Dagat eyed". The Philippine Star. Retrieved 28 September 2017.
  9. Ganzel, Bill (2007). "The Development of "Miracle Rice" Varieties". Wessels Living History Farm. Ganzel Group. Retrieved 19 September 2017.
  10. 1 2 Javier, Emil Q. (2016-11-05). "Masagana 99 redux". The Manila Bulletin . Archived from the original on 2016-11-06. Retrieved 2020-05-24.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Ayroso, Dee (2016-04-20). "'Marcos era saw most rapid environmental degradation, biodiversity loss'". Bulatlat. Retrieved 2021-07-13.
  12. 1 2 Kenmore, P.E.; Litsinger, J.A.; Bandong, J.P.; Santiago, A.C.; Salac, M.M. (2019-03-11). "Philippine Rice Farmers And Insecticides: Thirty Years Of Growing Dependency And New Options For Change". In Tait, Joyce (ed.). Management of Pests and Pesticides. CRC Press. pp. 98–108. doi:10.1201/9780429038587-13. ISBN   978-0-429-03858-7. S2CID   211754723.
  13. Domingo, Katrina (2020-05-20). "'800 banks bankrupted': Dominguez disputes Imee Marcos' claim that father's Masagana program a success". ABS CBN News and Public Affairs. Retrieved 2020-05-20.