Missing years (Jewish calendar)

Last updated

The missing years in the Hebrew calendar refer to a chronological discrepancy between the rabbinic dating for the destruction of the First Temple in 422 BCE (3338 Anno Mundi) [1] and the academic dating of it in 587 BCE. In a larger sense, it also refers to the discrepancy between conventional chronology versus that of Seder Olam in what concerns the Persian period during which time it exercised hegemony over Israel, a period which spanned 207 years according to conventional chronology, [2] but only 34 years according to Seder Olam. Invariably, the resulting timeframe effects also the number of years in which stood the Second Temple, said by a late rabbinic tradition to have stood 420 years, but by conventional chronology 589 years. [3]

Contents

Dating in academic sources

The academic datings in question are confirmed by a variety of Persian, Babylonian and Greek sources, which include records of datable astronomical observations such as eclipses, [4] although there are disagreements among modern scholars, ranging from 1 to 2 years, over some of the dates in the conventional chronology. [5]

Siege of Jerusalem (597 BC)

Both the Babylonian Chronicles and the Bible indicate that Nebuchadnezzar captured Jerusalem. The Babylonian Chronicles (as published by Donald Wiseman in 1956) establish that Nebuchadnezzar captured Jerusalem the first time on 2 Adar (16 March) 597 BCE. [6] Before Wiseman's publication, E. R. Thiele had determined from the biblical texts that Nebuchadnezzar's initial capture of Jerusalem occurred in the spring of 597 BCE, [7] while other scholars, including William F. Albright, more frequently dated the event to 598 BCE. [8]

Second siege and destruction of the First Temple

According to the Bible, Nebuchadnezzar installed Zedekiah as king after his first siege, [9] and Zedekiah ruled for 11 years before the second siege resulted in the end of his kingdom. [10]

Although there is no dispute that Jerusalem fell the second time in the summer month of Tammuz, [11] Albright dates the end of Zedekiah's reign (and the fall of Jerusalem) to 587 BCE, whereas Thiele offers 586 BCE. [12] Thiele's reckoning is based on the presentation of Zedekiah's reign on an accession basis, which was used for most but not all of the kings of Judah. In that case, the year that Zedekiah came to the throne would be his first partial year; his first full year would be 597/596 BCE, and his eleventh year, the year Jerusalem fell, would be 587/586 BCE. Since Judah's regnal years were counted from Tishrei in autumn, this would place the end of his reign and the capture of Jerusalem in the summer of 586 BCE. [12] [13]

Dating in traditional Jewish sources

A variety of rabbinic sources state that the Second Temple stood for 420 years. [14] In traditional Jewish calculations, based on Seder Olam Rabbah , the destruction of the Second Temple fell in the year 68 of the Common Era, implying that it was built in about 352 BCE. [15] [16] [17] Adding 70 years between the destruction of the First Temple and the construction of the Second Temple, it follows that the First Temple was destroyed in around 422 BCE. [15] [18] While acceptance of this chronology was widespread among ancient rabbis, it was not universal: Pirkei deRabbi Eliezer, Midrash Lekach Tov, and numerous rishonim disagree with the chronology of Seder Olam Rabbah. [19]

The traditional Jewish date recognized by the rabbis as the "year of destruction" is approximately 165 years later than the accepted year of 587 or 586 BCE. This discrepancy is referred to as the "missing years".

Details of rabbinic chronology

According to the Talmud [20] and Seder Olam Rabbah, [21] the Second Temple stood for 420 years, with the years divided up as follows:

103 years (35 BCE – 68 CE) = Herod's Dynasty.
103 years (138–35 BCE) = Hasmonean Dynasty.
180 years (318–138 BCE) = Grecian rule over Israel
34 years (352–318 BCE) = Persian rule while the Second Temple stood (not including additional years of Persian rule before the Temple's construction).

The date of 318 BCE for the Greek conquest of Persia is evident from the Talmud, which implies that that Greek rule began six years before the beginning of the Seleucid era (which occurred in 312/11 BCE). [22] [23] [24] (Note that in academic chronology, Alexander conquered the Persian empire between 334–330 BCE.)

Seventy years passed between the destruction of the First Temple and the building of the Second Temple in the seventy first year, [25] so construction of the Second Temple in 352 BCE implies that the First Temple was destroyed in 423 BCE.

Similarly, Megillat Antiochus implies that the Second Temple was built in 352 BCE, and thus that the First Temple was destroyed in 423 BCE. [26]

The figure of 420 years is likely derived from the prophecy of seventy weeks in Daniel 9:24–27. The rabbis this passage interpreted as referring to a period of 490 years which would pass between the destructions of the First and Second Temple—70 years between the Temples, plus 420 years of the Second Temple, starting in the 71st year after the destruction, [27] [19] though the passage can plausibly be interpreted in other ways. [19]

Proposed explanations

If traditional dates are assumed to be based on the standard Hebrew calendar, then the differing traditional and modern academic dating of events cannot both be correct. Attempts to reconcile the two systems must show one or both to have errors.

Missing years in Jewish tradition

Scholars see the discrepancy between the traditional and academic date of the destruction of the First Temple arising as a result of Jewish sages missing out the reign lengths of several Persian kings during the Persian Empire's rule over Israel. Modern scholars tally 14 Persian kings whose combined reigns total 207 years. [28] [29] By contrast, ancient Jewish sages only mention four Persian kings totaling 52 years. The reigns of several Persian kings appear to be missing from the traditional calculations.

Azariah dei Rossi [30] was likely the first Jewish authority to claim that the traditional Hebrew dating is not historically precise regarding the years before the Second Temple, [31] : 262  [19] : 82  [32] : 77  and suggests that the Sages of Israel may have chosen to include in their chronology only those years of the period of Persian dominion that were clearly expressed or implied in the Bible. [33] Additional time, the length of which was not clearly stated, was chosen to be ignored. [33] Nachman Krochmal [34] agreed with dei Rossi, [19] :  51   pointing to the Greek name Antigonos mentioned in Pirkei Avot 1:3 as proof that there must have been a longer period to account for this sign of Hellenic influence. Dei Rossi and Krochmal argued that when the length of a historical period was unknown, Seder Olam Rabbah took the method of assuming the shortest possible length. [19] : 126 

Astrologer and chronicler, Raḥamim Sar-Shalom, following the view of dei Rossi, suggests that the purpose of the author of Seder Olam was only to state the number of years of the Persian period that were included in the Bible, and that a lack of understanding of the purpose by the Amoraim is what caused them, among other things, to calculate the date from creation erroneously. [35] The "missing years" not only offset the span of the Persian period, but also offset the number of years collected since the first man, Adam, walked the face of the earth.

Solomon Judah Loeb Rapoport noted that the traditional Jewish chronology, when combined with another rabbinic tradition, places the Exodus from Egypt at exactly 1000 years prior to the Seleucid era (known in Jewish sources as "Minyan Shtarot"). He suggests that the authors of the traditional Jewish chronology intentionally omitted years from the Persian period to obtain the round number with the intent of allowing Jews who had counted years from the Exodus to easily switch to the Seleucid era system, used by Greek rulers at the time. [36]

David Zvi Hoffmann points out that the Mishnah in Avot (1:4) in describing the chain of tradition uses the plural "accepted from them" even though the previous Mishnah mentions only one person. He posits that there must have been another Mishnah mentioning two sages that was later removed.[ citation needed ]

Shimon Schwab interpreted the Biblical words "seal the words and close the book" (Daniel 12:4) as a commandment to obscure the Biblical chronology so that it would not be possible to accurately calculate the time of the Messiah's arrival. Thus, according to Schwab, the traditional Jewish calendar intentionally omitted years from the Persian period. [37] However, Schwab later withdrew that suggestion for numerous reasons. [31] : 281-285  [19] :  66–67   [32] : 67–68, 93 

A 2006 article in Ḥakirah journal suggested that the sages were concerned with the acceptance of the Mishnah. There existed a rabbinical tradition that the year 4000 marked the close of the "era of Torah". Thus, it is proposed, the sages arranged the chronology so that the redaction of the Mishnah should coincide with that date and thus have a better chance of acceptance. [32] : 67–115 

Mordechai Breuer suggested that like other works of midrash, the tradition chronology in Seder Olam Rabbah was never meant to be taken literally but rather was intended to be symbolic. [38]

Some Jewish thinkers, including Isaac Abarbanel, Chaim Hirschensohn and Adin Steinsaltz, have argued that the original Jewish chronology agreed with the academic chronology, but later misunderstandings or textual corruptions of Seder Olam Rabbah gave the impression that it refers to a shorter period of time. [19] However, Seder Olam Rabbah's chronology is implicit in many different passages, and it is difficult to plausibly explain all of the passages in a way that agrees with the academic chronology. [19] : 116 

Seder Olam versus Conventional chronology
Successive Chaldean rulersConventional chronology [39] Seder Olam's chronology [40]
Nebuchadnezzar 43 years [41] [42] 45 years [40] [43] [lower-alpha 1]
Amel-Marduk 2 years [44] 23 years [40] [43]
It is to be noted here that where conventional chronology goes on to cite another 3 successive Chaldean kings (spanning a period of nearly 22 years), Talmudic chronology cites only one Chaldean king that reigned after Amel-Marduk, namely, Baltasar (co-regent with Nabonidus), and who is said by the Talmudic record to have reigned a mere 3 years.
Neriglissar 4 years [45] ---
Labosordacus 9 months [46] ---
Nabonidus (Baltasar) [47] (Note: Others see Baltasar as Nabonidus' son and co-regent)[Nabonidus]
17 years [48] [49] [lower-alpha 2] 		[Baltasar]
3 years [40] [50] [lower-alpha 3]
Total number of years:67 years71 years
Successive Persian rulersConventional chronology [39] Seder Olam's chronology [51]
Herodotus notes in his Histories that Cyrus the Great reigned 29 years. [52] However, from Cyrus' taking of Babylon in the 17th year of the reign of Nabonidus, only 9 years remained of Cyrus' 29-year reign. [39] This view is corroborated by Ptolemy's Canon . The nine years of Cyrus' reign as mentioned by him only reflect the number of regnal years remaining after Cyrus the Great conquered Babylon in 539 BCE. Cyrus is thought to have died in 530 BCE. [53]
Cyrus the Great 29 years [52] [lower-alpha 4] 3 years [43] [lower-alpha 5]
Cambyses (Note: In the Talmud (Megillah 11b), Cambyses is not mentioned, but is replaced by Ahasuerus who is thought to have succeeded Cyrus the Great)[Cambyses]
7 years and 5 months [54] [lower-alpha 6] 		[Ahasuerus]
14 years [55]
The Magi 7 months [56] ---
Darius, the son of Hystaspes36 years [57] [58] 2 years [lower-alpha 7]
[36 years] [59] [lower-alpha 8]
Xerxes (Artaxerxes), the Great, b. Darius [lower-alpha 9] 21 years [58] ---
Artabanus 7 months [58] ---
Artaxerxes (Cyrus) b. Xerxes the Great
(Ahasuerus) [lower-alpha 10] 		41 years [58] ---
Xerxes 2 months [58] [62] ---
Sogdianus 7 months [58] ---
Darius, the son of Xerxes19 years [58] [62] ---
Artaxerxes II Mnemon [lower-alpha 11] 46 years [62] ---
Artaxerxes III Ochus21 years [62] ---
Artaxerxes IV Arses2 years [62] ---
Darius III Codomannus4 years [62] [63] ---
Total number of years:228 years + 4 mo. [lower-alpha 12] 53 years

Critiques of academic dating

Attempts have been made to reinterpret the historical evidence to agree with the rabbinic tradition. Specifically, arguments against Herodotus as a reliable historian, which is used primarily for academic sources. The reinterpretation of the Greek, Babylonian and Persian sources that is required to support the traditional dating has been achieved only in parts and rejected by mainstream scholarship.[ citation needed ]; David Rohl also believes there is an issue with the chronology of secular sources vs. scripture, arguing that there is a missing approximate 200 year period that would make the Exodus and events of the Bible largely historical. Rabbinical sources seem to agree with this argument, as Rohl's revised chronology would make their chronology more plausible.

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ According to one Jewish tradition, the seventy-year period of exile commences with the beginning of Nebuchadnezzar's reign, and concludes with the rise of Cyrus the Great who ordered the rebuilding of Jerusalem.
  2. ↑ The scholars who deciphered The Babylonian Chronicles (inscribed on tablets) and who analyzed the delineation of years inscribed therein have put the fall of Babylon, in the 17th-year of Nabonidus, in 539 BCE.
  3. ↑ In the Talmud, the name Nabonidus is not mentioned, whereas the presumed succession went from Nebuchadnezzar to his son Amel-Marduk, and from Amel-Marduk to his son Baltasar. Although the full regnal years of the man are not mentioned in the Hebrew Bible, there is, however, a reference in Daniel 8:1 alluding to Baltasar's 3rd-year of reign, including a reference to Baltasar's death in Daniel 5:30–31. According to Rabbeinu Chananel on BT Megillah 11b, the seventy-year period spoken of by Jeremiah (25:11–12; 29:10) and by Daniel (9:1–2) refers to the period of time from the destruction of Jerusalem in the days of Nebuchadnezzar to the 2nd-year of the reign of Darius the Great, the same year being the 3rd and final year of Baltasar's reign.
  4. ↑ In Parker's and Dubberstein's Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C.–A.D. 75, p. 14, Cyrus' reign takes up where Nabonidus' reign ends. The nine years given for Cyrus only reflect the number of regnal years remaining after Cyrus the Great conquered Babylon in 539 BCE, bringing an end to Nabonidus' seventeen-year reign. Cyrus is thought to have died in 530 BCE.
  5. ↑ The only reference in the Hebrew Bible mentioning the regnal years of Cyrus the Great is found in Daniel 10:1, viz., "In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia, etc." There is no indication as to how long he reigned.
  6. ↑ It is to be noted that historians differ as to the number of his regnal years. Manetho puts down for this king that he reigned 5 years over his own kingdom in Persia, but 6 years over Egypt. Ptolemy's Canon writes that he reigned 8 years.
  7. ↑ These two years are only mentioned by the Talmud (Megillah 11b) so as to mark the conclusion of the 70-year period of Jerusalem's destruction, when Darius, during his 2nd-year of reign, laid the foundation for the Second Temple's rebuilding. It does not imply the complete regnal years of Darius' reign.
  8. ↑ According to the Talmud (Megillah 11b), this Darius is thought to have been the son of Ahasuerus, based on a verse in Daniel 9:1. Seder Olam erroneously places this Darius as a contemporary with Alexander the Great, and the last of the Persian kings. In conventional chronology, Darius the Great was not the son of Ahasuerus, but rather the son of Hystaspes, and is said to have reigned 36 years, and was succeeded by his son Xerxes. However, in Seder Olam's chronology, Darius is mentioned only with respect to his 2nd-year of reign when he laid the foundation of the Second Temple (356 BCE), a crucial point of reference considering that it is thought to have marked the end of the seventy-year period of Jerusalem's destruction. According to Ezra 6:15, Darius went on to fully complete the Temple in the 6th-year of his reign (352 BCE), but since the entire period of Persian hegemony over Israel during the time of the Second Temple was thought by Seder Olam to have been a mere 34 years (from 352 BCE to 318 BCE), [60] this would imply that Grecian (Macedonian) hegemony over Israel began in 318 BCE, at the conclusion of Darius the Great's reign, or else at the beginning Xerxes' reign, when the Persian army was defeated by Alexander the Great. Modern scholarship has obviated the clear discrepancy in Seder Olam's chronology by saying that Tannaic scholars confounded Darius the Great with Darius III, and which caused the rabbis to omit ten other successive kings after Darius the Great.
  9. ↑ According to Josephus ( Antiquities 11.5.1-5), Ezra ascends to the Land of Israel, in 7th year of his reign.
  10. ↑ By some accounts, he is said to have also borne the name Ahasuerus, a contemporary of Esther and Mordecai. [61]
  11. ↑ According to Isaac Abarbanel, this ruler is the same as Ahasuerus (אחשורוש‎), who reigned in the days of Esther and Mordecai. According to Abarbanel, some say that he reigned 14 years, while others say that he reigned 40 years. [28]
  12. ↑ Years may vary depending on source used. Most authorities hold that the Persian period in the Land of Israel commenced in the year 539 BCE, and ended in 332 BCE, with Alexander the Great's victory over the Persians. [64] Mitchell First, who puts the Persian period at 207 years, reckons these years from when Cyrus first took Babylon in 539 BCE, rather than from Cyrus' first year of reign.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ezra</span> Figure in early Jewish history

Ezra or Esdras, also called Ezra the Scribe in Chazalic literature, and Ezra the Priest was an important Jewish scribe (sofer) and priest (kohen) in the early Second Temple period. In Greco-Latin Ezra is called Esdras. His name is probably a shortened Aramaic translation of the Hebrew name עזריהו‎ Azaryahu, "Yah helps". In the Greek Septuagint the name is rendered Ésdrās, from which the Latin name Esdras comes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Temple in Jerusalem</span> Former places of Israelite and Jewish worship

The Temple in Jerusalem, or alternatively the Holy Temple, refers to the two religious structures that served as the central places of worship for Israelites and Jews on the modern-day Temple Mount in the Old City of Jerusalem. According to the Hebrew Bible, the First Temple was built in the 10th century BCE, during the reign of Solomon over the United Kingdom of Israel. It stood until c. 587 BCE, when it was destroyed during the Babylonian siege of Jerusalem. Almost a century later, the First Temple was replaced by the Second Temple, which was built after the Neo-Babylonian Empire was conquered by the Achaemenid Persian Empire. While the Second Temple stood for a longer period of time than the First Temple, it was likewise destroyed during the Roman siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Babylonian captivity</span> Period in Jewish history, c. 586–539 BCE

The Babylonian captivity or Babylonian exile is the period in Jewish history during which a large number of Judeans from the ancient Kingdom of Judah were captives in Babylon, the capital city of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, following their defeat in the Jewish–Babylonian War and the destruction of Solomon's Temple in Jerusalem. The event is known to be historical, and is described in archaeological and extra-biblical sources, in addition to the Hebrew Bible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second Temple</span> Temple in Jerusalem (c. 516 BCE–70 CE)

The Second Temple, later known as Herod's Temple, was the reconstructed Temple in Jerusalem between c. 516 BCE and 70 CE. It stood as a pivotal symbol of Jewish faith and identity during the Second Temple period. The Second Temple served as the central place of Jewish worship, ritual sacrifice, and communal gathering for Jews, attracting Jewish pilgrims from distant lands during the three pilgrimage festivals: Passover, Shavuot and Sukkot.

The Sadducees were a socio-religious sect of Jews active in Judea during the Second Temple period, from the second century BCE to the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE. The Sadducees are often compared to other contemporaneous sects, including the Pharisees and the Essenes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jubilee (biblical)</span> Year at the end of seven cycles of shmita (Sabbatical years)

The Jubilee is the year that follows the passage of seven “weeks of years”. This fiftieth year deals largely with land, property, and property rights. According to regulations found in the Book of Leviticus, certain indentured servants would be released from servitude, some debts would be forgiven, and everyone was supposed to return to their own property in jubilee years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exilarch</span> Leader of the Jewish community in Mesopotamia

The exilarch was the leader of the Jewish community in Persian Mesopotamia during the era of the Parthians, Sasanians and Abbasid Caliphate up until the Mongol invasion of Baghdad in 1258 CE, with intermittent gaps due to ongoing political developments. The exilarch was regarded by the Jewish community as the royal heir of the House of David and held a place of prominence as both a rabbinical authority and as a noble within the Persian court. Within the Sasanian Empire, the exilarch was the political equivalent of the Catholicos of the Christian Church of the East, and was thus responsible for community-specific organizational tasks such as running the rabbinical courts, collecting taxes from Jewish communities, supervising and providing financing for the Talmudic academies in Babylonia, and the charitable re-distribution and financial assistance to needy members of the exile community. The position of exilarch was hereditary, held in continuity by a family that traced its patrilineal descent from antiquity stemming from king David.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jeconiah</span> Biblical figure; 19th monarch of the Kingdom of Judah

Jeconiah, also known as Coniah and as Jehoiachin, was the nineteenth and penultimate king of Judah who was dethroned by the King of Babylon, Nebuchadnezzar II in the 6th century BCE and was taken into captivity. He was the son and successor of King Jehoiakim, and the grandson of King Josiah. Most of what is known about Jeconiah is found in the Hebrew Bible. Records of Jeconiah's existence have been found in Iraq, such as the Jehoiachin's Rations Tablets. These tablets were excavated near the Ishtar Gate in Babylon and have been dated to c. 592 BCE. Written in cuneiform, they mention Jeconiah and his five sons as recipients of food rations in Babylon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Josiah</span> Biblical King of Judah

Josiah or Yoshiyahu was the 16th King of Judah. According to the Hebrew Bible, he instituted major religious reforms by removing official worship of gods other than Yahweh. Josiah is credited by most biblical scholars with having established or compiled important Hebrew scriptures during the "Deuteronomic reform" which probably occurred during his rule. Josiah became king of the Kingdom of Judah at the age of eight, after the assassination of his father, King Amon. Josiah reigned for 31 years, from 641/640 to 610/609 BCE.

<i>Shmita</i> Seventh year of the seven-year agricultural cycle mandated by the Torah for the Land of Israel

The sabbath year, also called the sabbatical year or shǝvi'it, or "Sabbath of The Land", is the seventh year of the seven-year agricultural cycle mandated by the Torah in the Land of Israel and is observed in Judaism.

According to Jewish tradition the Great Assembly was an assembly of 120 scribes, sages, and prophets, which existed from the early Second Temple period to the early Hellenistic period, roughly coinciding with the Persian hegemony over the nation of Israel. The assembly's members, known as Anshei Knesset HaGedolah, traditionally included such figures as Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, Ezra, Nehemiah, Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, Azariah, Mordechai and Zerubbabel.

<i>Anno Mundi</i> Calendar era based on the biblical account of creation

Anno Mundi, abbreviated as AM or A.M., or Year After Creation, is a calendar era based on the biblical accounts of the creation of the world and subsequent history. Two such calendar eras have seen notable use historically:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chronology of the Bible</span> Chronology according to the Hebrew Bible

The chronology of the Bible is an elaborate system of lifespans, 'generations', and other means by which the Masoretic Hebrew Bible measures the passage of events from the creation to around 164 BCE. It was theological in intent, not historical in the modern sense, and functions as an implied prophecy whose key lies in the identification of the final event. The passage of time is measured initially by adding the ages of the Patriarchs at the birth of their firstborn sons, later through express statements, and later still by the synchronised reigns of the kings of Israel and Judah.

<i>Seder Olam Rabbah</i> 2nd-century CE biblical chronology

Seder Olam Rabbah is a 2nd-century CE Hebrew language chronology detailing the dates of biblical events from creation to Alexander the Great's conquest of Persia. It adds no stories beyond what is in the biblical text, and addresses such questions as the age of Isaac at his binding and the number of years that Joshua led the Israelites. Tradition considers it to have been written about 160 CE by Jose ben Halafta, but it was probably also supplemented and edited at a later period.

<i>Seder Olam Zutta</i> Anonymous Hebrew chronicle

Seder Olam Zutta is an anonymous chronicle from 803 CE, called "Zuta" to distinguish it from the older Seder Olam Rabbah. This work is based upon, and to a certain extent completes and continues, the older aforementioned chronicle. It consists of two main parts: the first, comprising about three-fifths of the whole, deals with the chronology of the 50 generations from Adam to Jehoiakim, the second deals with 39 generations of exilarchs, beginning with Jehoiachin and going until the 9th century CE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Megillat Antiochus</span> Scroll about the story of Hanukkah

Megillat Antiochus recounts the story of Hanukkah and the history of the victory of the Maccabees over the hellenistic Seleucid Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ezra in rabbinic literature</span>

Allusions in rabbinic literature to the Biblical character of Ezra, the leader and lawgiver who brought some of the Judean exiles back from Babylonian captivity, contain various expansions, elaborations and inferences beyond what is presented in the text of the Bible itself.

Eliezer Shulman was a biblical scholar and historian. He wrote in Hebrew.

Jewish tradition has long preserved a record of dates and time sequences of important historical events related to the Jewish nation, including but not limited to the dates fixed for the building and destruction of the Second Temple, and which same fixed points in time are well-documented and supported by ancient works, although when compared to the synchronistic chronological tables of modern-day chroniclers, belabored mostly by western scholars of history, they are, notwithstanding, often at variance with their modern dating system. Discrepancies between the two systems may be as much as 2 years, or well-over 100 years, depending on the event. Prior to the adoption of the BC / AD era of computation and its synchronization with the regnal years of kings and Caesars recorded in historical records, Jews made use of the earlier Seleucid era counting, or, in Hebrew, minyan li-šṭarōth, by which historical dates were marked, from the time of Alexander the Great.

References

  1. ↑ Rashi on Babylonian Talmud, Avodah Zara 9a; Seder hadoroth year 3338 Anno Mundi
  2. ↑ First, Mitchell (1997). Jewish History in Conflict. Northvale, New Jersey / Jerusalem: Jason Aronson. p. 5. ISBN   1-56821-970-9. In the conventional chronology, the Persian period commenced in the year 539 BCE... and the entire Persian period spanned the years 539 to 332 BCE.
  3. ↑ First, Mitchell (1997). Jewish History in Conflict. Northvale, New Jersey / Jerusalem: Jason Aronson. p. 4. ISBN   1-56821-970-9.
  4. ↑ Missing years in the Hebrew calendar
  5. ↑ First, Mitchell (1997). Jewish History in Conflict. Northvale, New Jersey / Jerusalem: Jason Aronson. p. 4 (note 10). ISBN   1-56821-970-9.
  6. ↑ D. J. Wiseman, Chronicles of Chaldean Kings in the British Museum (London: Trustees of the British Museum, 1956) 73.
  7. ↑ Edwin Thiele, The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings , (1st ed.; New York: Macmillan, 1951; 2d ed.; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1965; 3rd ed.; Grand Rapids: Zondervan/Kregel, 1983). ISBN   0-8254-3825-X, 9780825438257, 217.
  8. ↑ Kenneth Strand, "Thiele's Biblical Chronology As a Corrective for Extrabiblical Dates," Andrews University Seminary Studies 34 (1996) 310, 317.
  9. ↑ 2 Chronicles 36:6–10
  10. ↑ 2 Chronicles 36:11
  11. ↑ Jeremiah 52:6
  12. 1 2 Edwin Thiele, The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings , (1st ed.; New York: Macmillan, 1951; 2d ed.; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1965; 3rd ed.; Grand Rapids: Zondervan/Kregel, 1983). ISBN   0-8254-3825-X, 9780825438257.
  13. ↑ Leslie McFall, "A Translation Guide to the Chronological Data in Kings and Chronicles," Bibliotheca Sacra 148 (1991) 45.
  14. ↑ Seder Olam Rabbah chapter 30; Tosefta Zevahim 13:6; Jerusalem Talmud Megillah 18a; Babylonian Talmud Megillah 11b-12a, Arakhin 12b
  15. 1 2 Hadad, David (2005). Sefer Maʻaśe avot (in Hebrew) (4 ed.). Beer Sheba: Kodesh Books. p. 364. OCLC   74311775. (with endorsements by Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, Rabbi Shlomo Amar, and Rabbi Yona Metzger)
  16. ↑ Sar-Shalom, Rahamim (1984). She'harim La'Luah Ha'ivry (Gates to the Hebrew Calendar) (in Hebrew). Tel-Aviv. p. 161 (Comparative chronological dates). OCLC   854906532.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  17. ↑ Maimonides (1974). Sefer Mishneh Torah - HaYad Ha-Chazakah (Maimonides' Code of Jewish Law) (in Hebrew). Vol. 4. Jerusalem: Pe'er HaTorah. pp. 184–185 [92b–93a] (Hil. Shmitta ve-yovel 10:2–4). OCLC   122758200. According to this calculation, this year which is one-thousand, one-hundred and seven years following the destruction, which year in the Seleucid era counting is [today] the 1,487th year (corresponding with Tishri 1175–Elul 1176 CE), being the year 4,936 anno mundi, it is a Seventh Year [of the seven-year cycle], and it is the 21st year of the Jubilee" (END QUOTE). = the destruction occurring in the lunar month of Av, two months preceding the New Year of 3,829 anno mundi.
  18. ↑ Maimonides (1989). Jehoshua Blau (ed.). R. Moses b. Maimon Responsa (in Hebrew). Vol. 2. Jerusalem: Meḳitse nirdamim / Rubin Mass Ltd. pp. 666–668 (responsum #389). OCLC   78411726.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 First, Mitchell (1997). Jewish History in Conflict: A Study of the Major Discrepancy between Rabbinic and Conventional Chronology. Jason Aronson, Incorporated. ISBN   9781461629122.
  20. ↑ Avodah Zarah 8b–9a
  21. ↑ Chapter 30
  22. ↑ Avodah Zarah 10a; see commentary of Rabbeinu Chananel there
  23. ↑ Feeney, D. (2007). Caesar's Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History . Berkeley: University of California Press. p.  139. ISBN   9780520251199.
  24. ↑ Stern, Sacha (2001). Calendar and Community: A History of the Jewish Calendar Second Century BCE–Tenth Century CE . Oxford: Oxford University Press. p.  281 (note 33). ISBN   978-0-19-827034-8.
  25. ↑ 2 Chronicles 36:21
  26. ↑ See Megillat Antiochus#Chronology in Megillat Antiochus
  27. ↑ Seder Olam Rabbah, chapter 28. According to Rabbi Jose in Seder Olam, this figure is had by an exegesis on Daniel 9:24–27 and where "seventy weeks" is explained as being seven years for every week, for a total of 490 years, beginning with the time of the destruction of the First Temple, and ending with the destruction of the Second Temple, and where for seventy years after the First Temple was destroyed there was no Temple. This leaves 420 years for the duration of the Second Temple. The same teaching can be found in the Babylonian Talmud (Nazir 32b).
  28. 1 2 Abravanel, Isaac (1860). Maʻyenei ha-Yeshuʻah (Commentary on the Book of Daniel). Stettin, Poland: R. Grossmann & E. Shrentsel. p.  46a. OCLC   50864691. (Amsterdam 1647)
  29. ↑ First, Mitchell (1997). Jewish History in Conflict. Northvale, New Jersey / Jerusalem: Jason Aronson. pp. 17, 19–20. ISBN   1-56821-970-9.
  30. ↑ In Me'or Einayim (c. 1573)
  31. 1 2 Schwab, Shimon (1991). "Comparative Jewish Chronology?". Selected speeches : a collection of addresses and essays on hashkafah, contemporary issues and Jewish history : including "Comparative Jewish chronology" (PDF). CIS Publishers. ISBN   9781560620587.
  32. 1 2 3 Epstein, Sheldon; Dickman, Bernard; Wilamowsky, Yonah (2006). "A Y2K Solution to the Chronology Problem" (PDF). Hakirah. 3.
  33. 1 2 First, Mitchell (1997). Jewish History in Conflict. Northvale, New Jersey / Jerusalem: Jason Aronson. p. 48. ISBN   1-56821-970-9.
  34. ↑ In Guide to the perplexed of our times (Hebrew, 1851)
  35. ↑ First, Mitchell (1997). Jewish History in Conflict. Northvale, New Jersey / Jerusalem: Jason Aronson. p. 94. ISBN   1-56821-970-9.
  36. ↑ Erekh Millin, p.74
  37. ↑ Simon Schwab (1962). "Comparative Jewish Chronology". Ateret Tsevi: Jubilee volume presented in honor of the eightieth birthday of Rabbi Dr. Joseph Breuer (PDF). New York: Feldheim. pp. 177–197.
  38. ↑ הוראת ההיסטוריה ואמונת חכמים, ספרית המורה הדתי - תולדות ישראל א (תשלז) 71-82
  39. 1 2 3 Parker, R.A.; Dubberstein, Waldo H. (1956). Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C.–A.D. 75. Providence: Brown University Press. OCLC   460027103.
  40. 1 2 3 4 Ben Halpetha, Jose (1971). M.D. Yerushalmi (ed.). Seder Olam Rabba (in Hebrew). Gil Publishers, in affiliation with the Haredi Youth Organization. pp. 89, 91 (chapter 28). OCLC   233090728. (reprint of 1955 edition, Jerusalem)
  41. ↑ Parker, R.A.; Dubberstein, Waldo H. (1956). Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C.–A.D. 75. Providence: Brown University Press. p. 12. OCLC   460027103.
  42. ↑ Josephus, Against Apion 1:19–20 (1.146), citing Berossus.
  43. 1 2 3 Babylonian Talmud (Megillah 11b)
  44. ↑ See Parker, R.A.; Dubberstein, Waldo H. (1956). Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C.–A.D. 75. Providence: Brown University Press. p. 28. OCLC   460027103., who put down only two regnal years for this king; Josephus, Against Apion 1:19–20 (1.146–147), citing Berossus. (It is to be noted that Josephus, elsewhere, contradicts himself, saying that Amel-Marduk reigned 18 years.)
  45. ↑ See Parker, R.A.; Dubberstein, Waldo H. (1956). Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C.–A.D. 75. Providence: Brown University Press. p. 29. OCLC   460027103., who put down only four regnal years for this king, and who is called by them Nergal-Shar-Usur; Josephus, Against Apion 1.147. (It is to be noted that Josephus, elsewhere, contradicts himself, saying that Neriglissar reigned 40 years).
  46. ↑ Josephus, Against Apion 1.148
  47. ↑ Josephus in his Antiquities (10.11.2–4.) wrote that Baltasar (Belshazzar) is simply another name for Nabonidus
  48. ↑ Parker, R.A.; Dubberstein, Waldo H. (1956). Babylonian Chronology, 626 B.C.–A.D. 75. Providence: Brown University Press. pp. 13–14. OCLC   460027103.
  49. ↑ Josephus, Against Apion 1.150–151
  50. ↑ Babylonian Talmud (Megillah 11b).
  51. ↑ Ben Halpetha, Jose (1971). M.D. Yerushalmi (ed.). Seder Olam Rabba (in Hebrew). Gil Publishers, in affiliation with the Haredi Youth Organization. p. 96 (chapter 29). OCLC   233090728. (reprint of 1955 edition, Jerusalem)
  52. 1 2 Herodotus (1975). G.P. Goold (ed.). Herodotus: The Persian Wars. Vol. 1 (Books I–II). Translated by A.D. Godley. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd. p.  269 s. 213–215 (Book I). ISBN   0-674-99130-3. ( ISBN   0-434-99117-1 - British)
  53. ↑ "The Babylonian Chronicle" by David Noel Freedman, in The Biblical Archaeologist, Vol. 19, No. 3 (Sep., 1956), pp. 49-60 (JSTOR   3209218)
  54. ↑ Herodotus (1921). G.P. Goold (ed.). Herodotus: The Persian Wars. Vol. 2 (Books III–IV). Translated by A.D. Godley. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd. p. 87 s. 65–68 (Book III). ISBN   0-674-99131-1. ( ISBN   0 434 99118 X - British).
  55. ↑ These years, according to the Talmud (Megillah 11b), are attributed unto Ahasuerus, who is thought to have reigned after Cyrus the Great.
  56. ↑ Herodotus (1921). G.P. Goold (ed.). Herodotus: The Persian Wars. Vol. 2 (Books III–IV). Translated by A.D. Godley. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd. p. 87 s. 65–68 (Book III). ISBN   0-674-99131-1. ( ISBN   0 434 99118 X - British)
  57. ↑ Herodotus (1971). E.H. Warmington (ed.). Herodotus: The Persian Wars. Vol. 3 (Books V–VII). Translated by A.D. Godley. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London: Harvard University Press; William Heinemann Ltd. p. 305 (Book VII). ISBN   0-674-99133-8. ( ISBN   0-434-99119-8 - British)
  58. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cory, I.P. (1828). The Ancient Fragments. London: William Pickering. p. 65. OCLC   1000992106. (cites the Persian kings as listed by Manetho)
  59. ↑ Rashi (Babylonian Talmud, Megillah 11b, s.v. באדין‎), following an opinion brought down elsewhere in the Babylonian Talmud (Rosh Hashana 3b), which, in turn, follows Seder Olam (chapter 30), says that Darius, Cyrus and Artaxerxes were all one and the same person.
  60. ↑ Ben Halpetha, Jose (1971). M.D. Yerushalmi (ed.). Seder Olam Rabba (in Hebrew). Gil Publishers, in affiliation with the Haredi Youth Organization. p. 99 (chapter 30). OCLC   233090728. (reprint of 1955 edition, Jerusalem)
  61. ↑ In the Septuagint, the Book of Esther refers to the king as 'Artaxerxes,' (Ancient Greek: Ἀρταξέρξης); Josephus, Antiquities 11.6.1–13.
  62. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ptolemy's Canon
  63. ↑ According to Parker's and Dubberstein's Babylonian Chronology, p. 36, the 6th-year of Alexander the Great's reign over Macedonia, which fell-out in 331 BCE, was the 5th-year of Darius III. During the same year, the Macedonians put an end to Persian hegemony over Israel.
  64. ↑ First, Mitchell (1997). Jewish History in Conflict: A Study of the Major Discrepancy between Rabbinic and Conventional Chronology. Lanham: Jason Aronson. p. 5. ISBN   978-1-56821-970-7. OCLC   845250409.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.