Neanderthal extinction

Last updated
Neanderthal extinction
Neanderthal distribution.jpg
Distribution of the Neanderthal, and main sites.
Expansion of early modern humans from Africa.jpg
Replacement of Neanderthals by early modern humans.

Neanderthals became extinct around 40,000 years ago. Hypotheses on the causes of the extinction include violence, transmission of diseases from modern humans which Neanderthals had no immunity to, competitive replacement, extinction by interbreeding with early modern human populations, natural catastrophes, climate change and inbreeding depression. It is likely that multiple factors caused the demise of an already low population.

Contents

Possible coexistence before extinction

Neanderthal tools 1911 Britannica-Archaeology-Palaeolithic.png
Neanderthal tools
Modern human tools Silex cromagnon noir.jpg
Modern human tools

In research published in Nature in 2014, an analysis of radiocarbon dates from forty Neanderthal sites from Spain to Russia found that the Neanderthals disappeared in Europe between 41,000 and 39,000 years ago with 95% probability. The study also found with the same probability that modern humans and Neanderthals overlapped in Europe for between 2,600 and 5,400 years. [1] Modern humans reached Europe between 45,000 and 43,000 years ago. [2] Improved radiocarbon dating published in 2015 indicates that Neanderthals disappeared around 40,000 years ago, which overturns older carbon dating which indicated that Neanderthals may have lived as recently as 24,000 years ago, [3] including in refugia on the south coast of the Iberian peninsula such as Gorham's Cave. [4] Zilhão et al. (2017) argue for pushing this date forward by some 3,000 years, to 37,000 years ago. [5] Inter-stratification of Neanderthal and modern human remains has been suggested, [6] but is disputed. [7] Stone tools that have been proposed to be linked to Neanderthals have been found at Byzovya (ru:Бызовая) in the polar Urals, and dated to 31,000 to 34,000 years ago, [8] but is also disputed. [9] At Mandrin Cave the French palaeolontologist Ludovic Slimak  [ fr ] and colleagues developed a new method of analysing soot from fires. They were able to distinguish between fires made by Neanderthals and modern humans based on the differing food residues in the soot as a result of their different diets. The researchers found that the last layer of soot from Neanderthal fires was a year or less before the first made by modern humans, and in Slimak's view this shows that the two species met and supports the hypothesis that the Neanderthals disappeared due to competitive replacement. [10]

Possible causes of extinction

Violence

Kwang Hyun Ko discusses the possibility that Neanderthal extinction was either precipitated or hastened by violent conflict with Homo sapiens. Violence in early hunter-gatherer societies usually occurred as a result of resource competition following natural disasters. It is therefore plausible to suggest that violence, including primitive warfare, would have transpired between the two human species. [11] The hypothesis that early humans violently replaced Neanderthals was first proposed by French paleontologist Marcellin Boule (the first person to publish an analysis of a Neanderthal) in 1912. [12]

Parasites and pathogens

Infectious diseases carried by Homo sapiens may have passed to Neanderthals, who would have had poor protection to infections they had not previously been exposed to, leading to devastating consequences for Neanderthal populations. Homo sapiens were less vulnerable to Neanderthal diseases, partly because they had evolved to cope with the far higher disease load of the tropics and so were more able to cope with novel pathogens, and partly because the higher numbers of Homo sapiens meant that even devastating outbreaks would still have left enough survivors for a viable population. [13] If viruses could easily jump between these two similar species, possibly because they lived near together, Homo sapiens might have infected Neanderthals and prevented the epidemic from burning out as Neanderthal numbers declined. The same process may also explain Homo sapiens' resilience to Neanderthal diseases and parasites. Novel human diseases likely moved from Africa into Eurasia. This purported "African advantage" remained until the agricultural revolution 10,000 years ago in Eurasia, after which domesticated animals surpassed other primates as the most prevalent source of new human infections, replacing the "African advantage" with a "Eurasian advantage". The catastrophic impact of Eurasian viruses on Native American populations in the historical past offers a sense of how modern humans may have affected hominin predecessor groups in Eurasia 40,000 years ago. Human and Neanderthal genomes and disease or parasite adaptations may give insight on this. [14] [15]

Infectious illness interactions may express the prolonged period of stagnation before the modification, as per disease ecology. Mathematical models have been used to make forecasts for future investigations, giving information about inter-species interactions during the shift between the Middle and Upper Paleolithic eras. This can be useful given the sparse material record from this time and the potential of DNA sequencing and dating technology. Such modeling, together with modern technology and prehistoric archaeological methodologies, may provide a fresh understanding of this time in human origins. [15]

Competitive replacement

Sapiens and Neanderthal skulls Neandertal vs Sapiens.jpg
Sapiens and Neanderthal skulls

Species specific disadvantages

Slight competitive advantage on the part of modern humans may have accounted for Neanderthals' decline on a timescale of thousands of years. [16] [17]

Generally small and widely dispersed fossil sites suggest that Neanderthals lived in less numerous and socially more isolated groups than contemporary Homo sapiens. Tools such as Mousterian flint stone flakes and Levallois points are remarkably sophisticated from the outset, yet they have a slow rate of variability and general technological inertia is noticeable during the entire fossil period. Artifacts are of utilitarian nature, and symbolic behavioral traits are undocumented before the arrival of modern humans in Europe around 40,000 to 35,000 years ago. [16] [18] [19]

The noticeable morphological differences in skull shape between the two human species also have cognitive implications. These include the Neanderthals' smaller parietal lobes [20] [21] [22] and cerebellum, [23] [24] areas implicated in tool use, [25] visuospatial integration, [26] numeracy, [27] creativity, [28] and higher-order conceptualization. [29] The differences, while slight, would have possibly been enough to affect natural selection and may underlie and explain the differences in social behaviors, technological innovation, and artistic output. [16]

Jared Diamond, a supporter of competitive replacement, points out in his book The Third Chimpanzee that the replacement of Neanderthals by modern humans is comparable to patterns of behavior that occur whenever people with advanced technology clash with people with less developed technology. [30]

Division of labour

In 2006, it was posited that Neanderthal Division of labour between the sexes was less developed than Middle paleolithic Homo sapiens. Both male and female Neanderthals participated in the single occupation of hunting big game, such as bison, deer, gazelles, and wild horses. This hypothesis proposes that the Neanderthal's relative lack of labour division resulted in less efficient extraction of resources from the environment as compared to Homo sapiens. [31]

Anatomical differences and running ability

Researchers such as Karen L. Steudel of the University of Wisconsin have highlighted the relationship of Neanderthal anatomy (shorter and stockier than that of modern humans) and the ability to run and the requirement of energy (30% more). [32]

Nevertheless, in the recent study, researchers Martin Hora and Vladimir Sladek of Charles University in Prague show that Neanderthal lower limb configuration, particularly the combination of robust knees, long heels, and short lower limbs, increased the effective mechanical advantage of the Neanderthal knee and ankle extensors, thus reducing the force needed and the energy spent for locomotion significantly. The walking cost of the Neanderthal male is now estimated to be 8–12% higher than that of anatomically modern males, whereas the walking cost of the Neanderthal female is considered to be virtually equal to that of anatomically modern females. [33]

Other researchers, like Yoel Rak, from Tel-Aviv University in Israel, have noted that the fossil records show that Neanderthal pelvises in comparison to modern human pelvises would have made it much harder for Neanderthals to absorb shocks and to bounce off from one step to the next, giving modern humans another advantage over Neanderthals in running and walking ability. However, Rak also notes that all archaic humans had wide pelvises, indicating that this is the ancestral morphology and that modern humans underwent a shift towards narrower pelvises in the late Pleistocene. [34]

Modern humans and alliance with dogs

Pat Shipman argues that the domestication of the dog gave modern humans an advantage when hunting. [35] Evidence shows the oldest remains of domesticated dogs were found in Belgium (31,700 BP) and in Siberia (33,000 BP). [36] [37] A survey of early sites of modern humans and Neanderthals with faunal remains across Spain, Portugal and France provided an overview of what modern humans and Neanderthals ate. [38] Rabbit became more frequent, while large mammals – mainly eaten by the Neanderthals – became increasingly rare. In 2013, DNA testing on the "Altai dog", a paleolithic dog's remains from the Razboinichya Cave (Altai Mountains), has linked this 33,000-year-old dog with the present lineage of Canis familiaris . [39]

Interbreeding

At the time of the last Neanderthals, approximately 45 to 40 thousand years ago, genetic analysis suggests that there was a gene flow from Neanderthals to modern humans of around 10%, but almost no flow from modern humans to Neanderthals. This may be an artifact due to the small number of late Neanderthal genomes, or because hybrids were not viable in Neanderthal groups, or because fertile Neanderthals were being absorbed into modern human groups but not vice versa. If the effect was real over an extended period, it would have increased the size of the modern human gene pool and reduced that of the already sparse Neanderthals, contributing to reduce their numbers below a viable population and thus to their extinction. [40] [41]

Inbreeding

According to a study by Rios et al, kinship patterns among recovered Neanderthal remains suggests that there was inbreeding, [42] such as pairings between half-siblings and/or uncle/aunt and niece/nephew. [43] Researchers hypothesize that Neanderthals may have become isolated into small groups during harsh climatic conditions, which contributed to inbreeding behaviours. [44] Due to the lack of genetic diversity, Neanderthal populations would have become more vulnerable to climatic changes, diseases, and other stressors, which may have contributed to their extinction. [45] [46] A similar model to the inbreeding hypothesis can be seen among endangered lowland gorillas. Their populations are so small that it has caused inbreeding, making them even more vulnerable to extinction. [47] [48]

Climate change

Neanderthals went through a demographic crisis in Western Europe that seems to coincide with climate change that resulted in a period of extreme cold in Western Europe. "The fact that Neanderthals in Western Europe were nearly extinct, but then recovered long before they came into contact with modern humans came as a complete surprise to us," said Love Dalén, associate professor at the Swedish Museum of Natural History in Stockholm. If so, this would indicate that Neanderthals may have been very sensitive to climate change. [49]

The data reveal that sudden climatic change, although crucial locally, had a limited effect on the worldwide Neanderthal population. Interbreeding and assimilation, which were hypothesized as causes in the death of European Neanderthal populations, are successful only for low levels of food competition. Future research will examine models of interbreeding, and hybridization may be evaluated using genomic records from the last ice age (Fu et al., 2016). [50]

Natural catastrophe

A number of researchers have argued that the Campanian Ignimbrite Eruption, a volcanic eruption near Naples, Italy, about 39,280 ± 110 years ago (older estimate ~37,000 years), erupting about 200 km3 (48 cu mi) of magma (500 km3 (120 cu mi) bulk volume) contributed to the extinction of Neanderthals. [51] The argument has been developed by Golovanova et al. [52] [53] The hypothesis posits that although Neanderthals had encountered several Interglacials during 250,000 years in Europe, [54] inability to adapt their hunting methods caused their extinction facing H. sapiens competition when Europe changed into a sparsely vegetated steppe and semi-desert during the last Ice Age. [55] Studies of sediment layers at Mezmaiskaya Cave suggest a severe reduction of plant pollen. [53] The damage to plant life would have led to a corresponding decline in plant-eating mammals hunted by the Neanderthals. [53] [56] [57]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human evolution</span> Evolutionary process leading to anatomically modern humans

Human evolution is the evolutionary process within the history of primates that led to the emergence of Homo sapiens as a distinct species of the hominid family that includes all the great apes. This process involved the gradual development of traits such as human bipedalism, dexterity, and complex language, as well as interbreeding with other hominins, indicating that human evolution was not linear but weblike. The study of the origins of humans involves several scientific disciplines, including physical and evolutionary anthropology, paleontology, and genetics; the field is also known by the terms anthropogeny, anthropogenesis, and anthropogony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early modern human</span> Old Stone Age Homo sapiens

Early modern human (EMH), or anatomically modern human (AMH), are terms used to distinguish Homo sapiens that are anatomically consistent with the range of phenotypes seen in contemporary humans, from extinct archaic human species. This distinction is useful especially for times and regions where anatomically modern and archaic humans co-existed, for example, in Paleolithic Europe. Among the oldest known remains of Homo sapiens are those found at the Omo-Kibish I archaeological site in south-western Ethiopia, dating to about 233,000 to 196,000 years ago, the Florisbad site in South Africa, dating to about 259,000 years ago, and the Jebel Irhoud site in Morocco, dated about 315,000 years ago.

<i>Homo heidelbergensis</i> Extinct species of archaic human

Homo heidelbergensis is an extinct species or subspecies of archaic human which existed during the Middle Pleistocene. It was subsumed as a subspecies of H. erectus in 1950 as H. e. heidelbergensis, but towards the end of the century, it was more widely classified as its own species. It is debated whether or not to constrain H. heidelbergensis to only Europe or to also include African and Asian specimens, and this is further confounded by the type specimen being a jawbone, because jawbones feature few diagnostic traits and are generally missing among Middle Pleistocene specimens. Thus, it is debated if some of these specimens could be split off into their own species or a subspecies of H. erectus. Because the classification is so disputed, the Middle Pleistocene is often called the "muddle in the middle".

<i>Homo</i> Genus of hominins that includes humans and their closest extinct relatives

Homo is a genus of great ape that emerged from the genus Australopithecus and encompasses only a single extant species, Homo sapiens, along with a number of extinct species classified as either ancestral or closely related to modern humans; these include Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis. The oldest member of the genus is Homo habilis, with records of just over 2 million years ago. Homo, together with the genus Paranthropus, is probably most closely related to the species Australopithecus africanus within Australopithecus. The closest living relatives of Homo are of the genus Pan, with the ancestors of Pan and Homo estimated to have diverged around 5.7-11 million years ago during the Late Miocene.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology</span> Research institute based in Leipzig, Germany

The Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology is a research institute based in Leipzig, Germany, that was founded in 1997. It is part of the Max Planck Society network.

Human taxonomy is the classification of the human species within zoological taxonomy. The systematic genus, Homo, is designed to include both anatomically modern humans and extinct varieties of archaic humans. Current humans have been designated as subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens, differentiated, according to some, from the direct ancestor, Homo sapiens idaltu.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archaic humans</span> Extinct relatives of modern humans

Archaic humans is a broad category denoting all species of the genus Homo that are not Homo sapiens, which are sometimes also called Homo sapiens sapiens, in which case the singular use of sapiens has been applied to some archaic humans as well. Among the earliest modern human remains are those from Jebel Irhoud in Morocco, Florisbad in South Africa (259 ka), Omo-Kibish I in southern Ethiopia, and Apidima Cave in Southern Greece. Some examples of archaic humans include H. antecessor (1200–770 ka), H. bodoensis (1200–300 ka), H. heidelbergensis (600–200 ka), Neanderthals, H. rhodesiensis (300–125 ka) and Denisovans.

The Neanderthal genome project is an effort of a group of scientists to sequence the Neanderthal genome, founded in July 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early human migrations</span> Spread of humans from Africa through the world

Early human migrations are the earliest migrations and expansions of archaic and modern humans across continents. They are believed to have begun approximately 2 million years ago with the early expansions out of Africa by Homo erectus. This initial migration was followed by other archaic humans including H. heidelbergensis, which lived around 500,000 years ago and was the likely ancestor of Denisovans and Neanderthals as well as modern humans. Early hominids had likely crossed land bridges that have now sunk.

The chimpanzee–human last common ancestor (CHLCA) is the last common ancestor shared by the extant Homo (human) and Pan genera of Hominini. Estimates of the divergence date vary widely from thirteen to five million years ago.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jean-Jacques Hublin</span> French paleoanthropologist

Jean-Jacques Hublin is a French paleoanthropologist. He is a professor at the Max Planck Society, Leiden University and the University of Leipzig and the founder and director of the Department of Human Evolution at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany. He is best known for his work on the Pleistocene hominins, and on the Neandertals and early Homo sapiens, in particular.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recent African origin of modern humans</span> "Out of Africa" theory of the early migration of humans

In paleoanthropology, the recent African origin of modern humans or the "Out of Africa" theory (OOA) is the mainstream academic model of the geographic origin and early migration of anatomically modern humans. It follows the early expansions of hominins out of Africa, accomplished by Homo erectus and then Homo neanderthalensis.

The multiregional hypothesis, multiregional evolution (MRE), or polycentric hypothesis, is a scientific model that provides an alternative explanation to the more widely accepted "Out of Africa" model of monogenesis for the pattern of human evolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Denisovan</span> Asian archaic human

The Denisovans or Denisova hominins are an extinct species or subspecies of archaic human that ranged across Asia during the Lower and Middle Paleolithic, and lived, based on current evidence, from 285 to 25 thousand years ago. Denisovans are known from few physical remains; consequently, most of what is known about them comes from DNA evidence. No formal species name has been established pending more complete fossil material.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neanderthal</span> Extinct Eurasian species or subspecies of archaic humans

Neanderthals are an extinct group of archaic humans who lived in Eurasia until about 40,000 years ago. The type specimen, Neanderthal 1, was found in 1856 in the Neander Valley in present-day Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Skhul and Qafzeh hominins</span> Hominin fossils

The Skhul and Qafzeh hominins or Qafzeh–Skhul early modern humans are hominin fossils discovered in Es-Skhul and Qafzeh caves in Israel. They are today classified as Homo sapiens, among the earliest of their species in Eurasia. Skhul Cave is on the slopes of Mount Carmel; Qafzeh Cave is a rockshelter near Nazareth in Lower Galilee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neanderthal anatomy</span> Anatomical composition of the Neanderthal body

Neanderthal anatomy differed from modern humans in that they had a more robust build and distinctive morphological features, especially on the cranium, which gradually accumulated more derived aspects, particularly in certain isolated geographic regions. This robust build was an effective adaptation for Neanderthals, as they lived in the cold environments of Europe. In which they also had to operate in Europe's dense forest landscape that was extremely different from the environments of the African grassland plains that Homo sapiens adapted to with a different anatomical build.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interbreeding between archaic and modern humans</span> Evidence of human hybridization during the Paleolithic

Interbreeding between archaic and modern humans occurred during the Middle Paleolithic and early Upper Paleolithic. The interbreeding happened in several independent events that included Neanderthals and Denisovans, as well as several unidentified hominins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Neanderthals in Southwest Asia</span> Neanderthals who lived in Turkey, the Levant, Iraq, and Iran

Southwest Asian Neanderthals were Neanderthals who lived in Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Israel, Palestine, Iraq, and Iran - the southernmost expanse of the known Neanderthal range. Although their arrival in Asia is not well-dated, early Neanderthals occupied the region apparently until about 100,000 years ago. At this time, Homo sapiens migration seem to have replaced them in one of the first anatomically-modern expansions out of Africa. In their turn, starting around 80,000 years ago, Neanderthals seem to have returned and replaced Homo sapiens in Southwest Asia. They inhabited the region until about 55,000 years ago.

This article records new taxa of fossil primates of every kind are scheduled to be described during the year 2019, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to paleontology of primates that are scheduled to occur in the year 2019.

References

  1. Higham, Tom; et al. (21 August 2014). "The timing and spatiotemporal patterning of Neanderthal disappearance". Nature. 512 (7514): 306–309. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..306H. doi:10.1038/nature13621. PMID   25143113. S2CID   205239973.
  2. John Noble Wilford (2011-11-02). "Fossil Teeth Put Humans in Europe Earlier Than Thought". The New York Times . Retrieved 2017-02-23.
  3. Dorey, Fran (30 October 2015). "Homo Neanderthalensis – The Neanderthals". Australian Museum . Retrieved 1 April 2017.
  4. Rincon, Paul (13 September 2006). "Neanderthals' 'last rock refuge'". BBC News. Retrieved 11 October 2009.Finlayson C, Pacheco FG, Rodríguez-Vidal J, et al. (October 2006). "Late survival of Neanderthals at the southernmost extreme of Europe". Nature. 443 (7113): 850–853. Bibcode:2006Natur.443..850F. doi:10.1038/nature05195. hdl:10261/18685. PMID   16971951. S2CID   4411186.
  5. Zilhão, João; et al. (2017). "Precise dating of the Middle-to-Upper Paleolithic transition in Murcia (Spain) supports late Neandertal persistence in Iberia". Heliyon. 3 (11): e00435. Bibcode:2017Heliy...300435Z. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00435 . PMC   5696381 . PMID   29188235.
  6. Gravina B, Mellars P, Ramsey CB (November 2005). "Radiocarbon dating of interstratified Neanderthal and early modern human occupations at the Chatelperronian type-site". Nature. 438 (7064): 51–56. Bibcode:2005Natur.438...51G. doi:10.1038/nature04006. PMID   16136079. S2CID   4335868.
  7. Zilhão, João; Francesco d’Errico; Jean-Guillaume Bordes; Arnaud Lenoble; Jean-Pierre Texier; Jean-Philippe Rigaud (2006). "Analysis of Aurignacian interstratification at the Châtelperronian-type site and implications for the behavioral modernity of Neandertals". PNAS. 103 (33): 12643–12648. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10312643Z. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605128103 . PMC   1567932 . PMID   16894152.
  8. Slimak, L.; Svendsen, J. I.; Mangerud, J.; Plisson, H.; Heggen, H. P.; Brugere, A.; Pavlov, P. Y. (2011). "Late Mousterian Persistence near the Arctic Circle". Science. 332 (6031): 841–845. Bibcode:2011Sci...332..841S. doi:10.1126/science.1203866. PMID   21566192. S2CID   24688365.
  9. Zwyns, Nicolas; Roebroeks, Wil; McPherron, Shannon P.; Jagich, Adam; Hublin, Jean-Jacques (2012-01-13). "Comment on "Late Mousterian Persistence near the Arctic Circle"". Science. 335 (6065): 167. Bibcode:2012Sci...335..167Z. doi: 10.1126/science.1209908 . ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   22246757.
  10. Slimak, Ludovic (2023). The Naked Neanderthal. Translated by Watson, David. London: Allen Lane. pp. 160–163. ISBN   978-0-241-61766-3.
  11. Ko, Kwang Hyun (2016). "Hominin interbreeding and the evolution of human variation". Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki. 23: 17. doi: 10.1186/s40709-016-0054-7 . PMC   4947341 . PMID   27429943.
  12. Boule, M 1920, Les hommes fossiles, Masson, Paris.
  13. Kennedy, Jonathan (2023). Pathogenesis: how Germs Made History. London, UK: Torva. pp. 42–43.
  14. Houldcroft, Charlotte J.; Underdown, Simon J. (July 2016). "Neanderthal genomics suggests a pleistocene time frame for the first epidemiologic transition: Neanderthal Infectious Diseases Genetics". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 160 (3): 379–388. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22985. PMID   27063929.
  15. 1 2 Greenbaum, Gili; Getz, Wayne M.; Rosenberg, Noah A.; Feldman, Marcus W.; Hovers, Erella; Kolodny, Oren (2019-11-01). "Disease transmission and introgression can explain the long-lasting contact zone of modern humans and Neanderthals". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 5003. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10.5003G. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12862-7. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   6825168 . PMID   31676766.
  16. 1 2 3 Wynn, Thomas; Overmann, Karenleigh A; Coolidge, Frederick L (2016). "The false dichotomy: A refutation of the Neandertal indistinguishability claim". Journal of Anthropological Sciences. 94 (94): 201–221. doi:10.4436/jass.94022 (inactive 2024-11-02). PMID   26708102.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  17. Banks, William E.; d'Errico, Francesco; Peterson, A. Townsend; Kageyama, Masa; Sima, Adriana; Sánchez-Goñi, Maria-Fernanda (24 December 2008). Harpending, Henry (ed.). "Neanderthal Extinction by Competitive Exclusion". PLOS ONE. 3 (12): e3972. Bibcode:2008PLoSO...3.3972B. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003972 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   2600607 . PMID   19107186.
  18. "Homo neanderthalensis Brief Summary". EOL. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
  19. Peresani, M; Dallatorre, S; Astuti, P; Dal Colle, M; Ziggiotti, S; Peretto, C (2014). "Symbolic or utilitarian? Juggling interpretations of Neanderthal behavior: new inferences from the study of engraved stone surfaces". J Anthropol Sci. 92 (92): 233–55. doi:10.4436/JASS.92007 (inactive 2024-11-02). PMID   25020018.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  20. Bruner, Emiliano (2004). "Geometric Morphometrics and Paleoneurology: Brain Shape Evolution in the Genus Homo". Journal of Human Evolution. 47 (5): 279–303. Bibcode:2004JHumE..47..279B. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.03.009. PMID   15530349.
  21. Bruner, Emiliano (2010). "Morphological Differences in the Parietal Lobes with the Human Genus: A Neurofunctional Perspective". Current Anthropology. 51 (1): S77–S88. doi:10.1086/650729. S2CID   146587487.
  22. Bruner, Emiliano; Manzi, Giorgio; Arsuaga, Juan Luis (2003). "Encephalization and Allometric Trajectories in the Genus Homo: Evidence from the Neandertal and Modern Lineages". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (26): 15335–15340. Bibcode:2003PNAS..10015335B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2536671100 . PMC   307568 . PMID   14673084.
  23. Hublin, Jean-Jacques; Neubauer, Simon; Gunz, Philipp (2015). "Brain Ontogeny and Life History in Pleistocene Hominins". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 370 (1663): 1–11. doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0062. PMC   4305163 . PMID   25602066.
  24. Weaver, Anne (2005). "Reciprocal Evolution of the Cerebellum and Neocortex in Fossil Humans". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 102 (10): 3576–3580. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.3576W. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500692102 . PMC   553338 . PMID   15731345.
  25. Orban, Guy A; Caruana, Fausto (2014). "The Neural Basis of Human Tool Use". Frontiers in Psychology. 5: 310. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00310 . PMC   3988392 . PMID   24782809.
  26. Bruner, Emiliano; Iriki, Atsushi (2016). "Extending Mind, Visuospatial Integration, and the Evolution of the Parietal Lobes in the Human Genus". Quaternary International. 405: 98–110. Bibcode:2016QuInt.405...98B. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2015.05.019. S2CID   127641606.
  27. Piazza, Manuela; Izard, Véronique (2009). "How Humans Count: Numerosity and the Parietal Cortex". Neuroscientist. 15 (3): 261–273. doi:10.1177/1073858409333073. PMID   19436075. S2CID   10271553.
  28. Vandervert, Larry R; Schimpf, Paul H; Liu, Hesheng (2007). "How Working Memory and the Cerebellum Collaborate to Produce Creativity and Innovation". Creativity Research Journal. 19 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/10400410709336873. S2CID   15247122.
  29. Balsters, Joshua H; Whelan, Christopher D; Robertson, Ian H; Ramnani, Narender (2013). "Cerebellum and Cognition: Evidence for the Encoding of Higher Order Rules". Cerebral Cortex. 23 (6): 1433–1443. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs127 . hdl: 2262/72974 . PMID   22617850.
  30. Diamond, J. (1992). The Third Chimpanzee: The Evolution and Future of the Human Animal. New York: Harper Collins, p. 45.
  31. Kuhn, Steven L.; Stiner, Mary C. (2006). "What's a Mother to Do? The Division of Labor among Neandertals and Modern Humans in Eurasia". Current Anthropology. 47 (6): 953–981. doi:10.1086/507197. S2CID   42981328.
  32. Steudel-Numbers, Karen L; Tilkens, Michael J (2004). "The Effect of Lower Limb Length on the Energetic Cost of Locomotion: Implications for Fossil Hominins". Journal of Human Evolution. 47 (1): 95–109. Bibcode:2004JHumE..47...95S. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.06.002. PMID   15288526.
  33. Hora, M; Sládek, V (2014). "Influence of lower limb configuration on walking cost in Late Pleistocene humans". Journal of Human Evolution. 67: 19–32. Bibcode:2014JHumE..67...19H. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.09.011. PMID   24485350.
  34. Lewin, Roger (27 April 1991). "Science: Neanderthals puzzle the anthropologists". New Scientist. Retrieved January 1, 2011.
  35. Shipman, P (2012). "Dog domestication may have helped humans thrive while Neandertals declined". American Scientist. 100 (3): 198. doi:10.1511/2012.96.198.
  36. Ovodov, ND; Crockford, SJ; Kuzmin, YV; Higham, TFG; Hodgins, GWL; et al. (2011). "A 33,000-Year-Old Incipient Dog from the Altai Mountains of Siberia: Evidence of the Earliest Domestication Disrupted by the Last Glacial Maximum". PLOS ONE. 6 (7): e22821. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...622821O. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022821 . PMC   3145761 . PMID   21829526.
  37. Germonpré, M.; Sablin, M.V.; Stevens, R.E.; Hedges, R.E.M.; Hofreiter, M.; Stiller, M.; Jaenicke-Desprese, V. (2009). "Fossil dogs and wolves from Palaeolithic sites in Belgium, the Ukraine and Russia: osteometry, ancient DNA and stable isotopes". Journal of Archaeological Science . 36 (2): 473–490. Bibcode:2009JArSc..36..473G. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.09.033.
  38. Fa, John E.; Stewart, John R.; Lloveras, Lluís; Vargas, J. Mario (2013). "Rabbits and hominin survival in Iberia". Journal of Human Evolution. 64 (4): 233–241. Bibcode:2013JHumE..64..233F. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.01.002. PMID   23422239.
  39. Druzhkova, AS; Thalmann, O; Trifonov, VA; Leonard, JA; Vorobieva, NV; et al. (2013). "Ancient DNA Analysis Affirms the Canid from Altai as a Primitive Dog". PLOS ONE. 8 (3): e57754. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...857754D. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057754 . PMC   3590291 . PMID   23483925.
  40. Li, Liming; et al. (12 July 2024). "Recurrent gene flow between Neanderthals and modern humans over the past 200,000 years". Science. 185 (158): 8.
  41. Stringer, Chris; Crete, Lucia (2022). "Mapping Interactions of Homo neanderthalis and Homo sapiens From the Fossil and Genetic Records". PaleoAnthropology (2): 407. ISSN   1545-0031.
  42. Ríos, L; Kivell, R.L; Lalueza-Fox, C; et al. (8 February 2019). "Skeletal Anomalies in The Neandertal Family of El Sidrón (Spain) Support A Role of Inbreeding in Neandertal Extinction". Sci Rep. 9 (1): 1697. Bibcode:2019NatSR...9.1697R. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38571-1. PMC   6368597 . PMID   30737446.
  43. Prüfer, K; et al. (5 Oct 2017). "A high-coverage Neandertal genome from Vindija Cave in Croatia". Science. 356 (6363): 655–658. Bibcode:2017Sci...358..655P. doi:10.1126/science.aao1887. PMC   6185897 . PMID   28982794.
  44. Vasesen, K; Scherjob, F; Hemerik, L; Verpoorte, A (November 27, 2019). "Inbreeding, Allee effects and stochasticity might be sufficient to account for Neanderthal extinction". PLOS ONE. 14 (11): e0225117. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1425117V. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225117 . PMC   6880983 . PMID   31774843.
  45. Ríos, L; Kivell, T.L; Lalueza-Fox, C; et al. (8 February 2019). "Skeletal Anomalies in The Neandertal Family of El Sidrón (Spain) Support A Role of Inbreeding in Neandertal Extinction". Sci Rep. 9 (1697): 1697. Bibcode:2019NatSR...9.1697R. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38571-1. PMC   6368597 . PMID   30737446.
  46. Vaesen, Krist (November 27, 2019). "Inbreeding, Allee effects and stochasticity might be sufficient to account for Neanderthal extinction". PLOS ONE. 14 (11): e0225117. Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1425117V. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225117 . PMC   6880983 . PMID   31774843.
  47. Hedrick, Philip W.; Kalinowski, Steven T. (2000). "Inbreeding Depression in Conservation Biology". Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 31: 139–162. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.139. JSTOR   221728.
  48. Macdonald, James (January 28, 2019). "When Endangered Wildlife Gets Inbred". JSTOR Daily.
  49. "Neanderthals may have faced extinction long before modern humans emerged". Phys.org. 2014-02-24. Retrieved 2017-02-23.
  50. Timmermann, Axel (June 2020). "Quantifying the potential causes of Neanderthal extinction: Abrupt climate change versus competition and interbreeding". Quaternary Science Reviews. 238: 106331. Bibcode:2020QSRv..23806331T. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106331 .
  51. Fisher, Richard V.; Giovanni Orsi; Michael Ort; Grant Heiken (June 1993). "Mobility of a large-volume pyroclastic flow – emplacement of the Campanian ignimbrite, Italy". Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research. 56 (3): 205–220. Bibcode:1993JVGR...56..205F. doi:10.1016/0377-0273(93)90017-L . Retrieved 2008-09-20.
  52. Golovanova, Liubov Vitaliena; Doronichev, Vladimir Borisovich; Cleghorn, Naomi Elansia; Koulkova, Marianna Alekseevna; Sapelko, Tatiana Valentinovna; Shackley, M. Steven (2010). "Significance of Ecological Factors in the Middle to Upper Paleolithic Transition". Current Anthropology. 51 (5): 655. doi:10.1086/656185. S2CID   144299365.
  53. 1 2 3 Than, Ker (September 22, 2010). "Volcanoes Killed Off Neanderthals, Study Suggests". National Geographic. Archived from the original on September 24, 2010. Retrieved 23 September 2010.
  54. Gilligan, I (2007). "Neanderthal extinction and modern human behaviour: the role of climate change and clothing". World Archaeology. 39 (4): 499–514. doi:10.1080/00438240701680492. hdl: 1885/28508 . S2CID   162388264.
  55. Climate Change Killed Neandertals, Study Says, National Geographic News
  56. "Volcanoes wiped out Neanderthals, new study suggests (ScienceDaily)". University of Chicago Press Journals. 7 October 2010. Retrieved 7 October 2010.
  57. Neanderthal Apocalypse Archived 2017-11-20 at the Wayback Machine Documentary film, ZDF Enterprises, 2015. Retrieved 26 January 2016.

Further reading