Neanderthal anatomy is characterised by a long, flat skull and a stocky body plan. When first discovered, Neanderthals were thought to be anatomically comparable to Aboriginal Australians, in accord with historical race concepts. As more fossils were discovered in the early 20th century, French palaeontologist Marcellin Boule defined them as a slouching, apelike species; a popular image until the middle of the century. Neanderthal features gradually accreted in European populations over the Middle Pleistocene, driven by natural selection in a cold climate, as well as genetic drift when populations crashed during glacial periods. This culminated in the "classical Neanderthal" anatomy by the Last Interglacial.
The Neanderthal skull is distinctive by namely a rounded supraorbital torus (brow ridge), large orbits (eye sockets) and nose, and an occipital bun at the back of the skull. The jaws and teeth are strong, which may have been a response to habitual heavy loading of the front teeth. The body is typically short and stocky, with an average size of 165cm (5ft 5in) and 78kg (172lb) for males, and 155cm (5ft 1in) and 66kg (146lb) for females. Short limbs may be an adaptation to the cold climate (Allen's rule) or to improve sprinting efficiency.
The brain is large, averaging 1,640cc (100cuin) in males and 1,460cc (89cuin) in females, larger than the average of any living population. The Neanderthal brain was organised much differently than the modern human brain, especially in regions related to cognition and language, which may be implicated in Neanderthal behaviour and the poorer evidence of material culture compared to Cro-Magnons.
Neanderthals may have had developed mesopic vision in low-light conditions, and a stronger respiratory system to fuel a comparatively faster metabolism. It is unclear if Neanderthals could produce speech at the same level as modern humans. Neanderthal skin and hair colour may have ranged from dark to light. Red hair seems to have been a rare trait. Neanderthals may have had a faster growth rate than modern humans. Neanderthals suffered extensively from traumatic injury and major physical trauma, possibly as a consequence of risky hunting strategies and animal attacks. They also maintained a low population and genetic diversity, leading to inbreeding depression.
When the first Neanderthal fossil, Neanderthal 1 (a skullcap), was discovered in 1856, initial reactions characterised it as belonging to a brutish, savage race of man. The low braincase and flattened forehead were often cited as evidence of its primitiveness, as classic markers of the lower races, in accord with historical race concepts. Consequently, the Neanderthal skull was often anatomically compared to most notably Aboriginal Australians, who were considered the most primitive race alive.[1] German pathologist Rudolf Virchow interpreted Neanderthal characteristics as evidence of senility, disease, and malformation instead of archaicness,[2] which stalled Neanderthal research until the end of the century.[3]
By the early 20th century, numerous other Neanderthal discoveries were made, establishing H. neanderthalensis as a legitimate species. The most influential specimen was La Chapelle-aux-Saints 1 ("The Old Man") from La Chapelle-aux-Saints, France. French palaeontologist Marcellin Boule described him as a hairy, slouching, ape-like creature; a reconstruction which would endure until around the middle of the 20th century.[3] By this point, several fossils from across the Old World were classified as "Neanderthaloid", a type of transitional fossil in human evolution halfway between Homo erectus and Homo sapiens. The modern anatomical definition of "Neanderthal" was formalised with the popularisation of cladistics in the late 1970s.[4]
Typical Neanderthal skull traits appear in the European fossil record near the beginning of the Middle Pleistocene, in specimens usually classified as H. heidelbergensis. These "pre-Neanderthals" seem to have gradually accreted these traits ("Neanderthalization") as populations better adapted to the cold environment, evolving a "hyper-arctic" physique.[a] Additionally, glacial periods may have forced populations into small refugia, reducing genetic diversity, leading to the development of other typical Neanderthal traits through genetic drift or pleiotropy. The "classical Neanderthal" anatomy appears by the Last Interglacial (Eemian).[4] With the sequencing of Neanderthal genetics, it was revealed that Neanderthals at least after 100,000 years ago maintained a small population with low genetic diversity, weakening natural selection and proliferating harmful mutations. Some populations show signs of inbreeding depression. It is unclear how long European populations suffered this population stress, or to what extent it influenced Neanderthalization.[5]
Skeleton
Skull
Comparisons of a modern Eurasian male example (left) and a Neanderthal (right) skull reconstruction at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History
Neanderthal skull features
The Neanderthal skull is distinguished namely by a flat and broad skullcap, rounded supraorbital torus (the brow ridges), high orbits (eye sockets), a broad nose, mid-facial prognathism (the face projects far from the base of the skull), an "en bombe" (bomb-like) skull shape when viewed from the back, and an occipital bun at the back of the skull.[4] The occipital bun, or "chignon", is within the range of variation for modern humans who have it. In Neanderthals, it is caused by the high and anterior (more forward) positions of the cranial base and temporal bones, in combination with a flatter skullcap.[6]
Jaws
In Neanderthals, the zygomatic arches (cheekbones) are positioned in a rearward location relative to modern humans, while the maxilla (upper jaw) and nasal bones are positioned in a more forward direction.[7] The front (anterior) teeth are characterised by their large size, strong and bulging tooth roots, and tooth wearing (especially on the lower front teeth). The upper incisors are shovel-shaped. There is a large retromolar space (gap behind the molars).[8] Especially in Europe, Neanderthals had a high frequency of taurodontism, a condition where the molars are bulkier due to an enlarged pulp (tooth core). In modern populations the trait has an incidence rate of about 5%, but a weaker form of taurodontism (hypotaurodontism) is somewhat common in some European H. heidelbergensis populations, especially at the Sima de los Huesos site.[9]
These observations are typically explained as a response to habitual heavy loading of the front teeth (anterior dental loading hypothesis), either to process mechanically challenging or attritive foods, or because they regularly used the mouth as a third hand.[b] The robusticity of the front teeth and the rest of the face has sometimes been ascribed to the production of a high bite force on the front teeth, but biomechanical studies have typically concluded that Neanderthals could produce similar or even smaller bite forces than modern humans.[8][10]
Brain
Neanderthal braincase and jaw from Spy Cave, Belgium
The Neanderthal braincase averages 1,640cm3 (100cuin) for males and 1,460cm3 (89cuin) for females,[11][12] which is significantly larger than the averages for all groups of recent humans;[13] for example, recent European males can average about 1,350cm3 (82cuin) and females 1,200cm3 (73cuin).[14] Modern human brain size seems to have decreased since the Upper Palaeolithic, with a sample of 28 modern human specimens from 190,000 to 25,000 years ago averaging about 1,478cm3 (90.2cuin) disregarding sex.[15] The largest Neanderthal brain, Amud 1, was calculated to be 1,736cm3 (105.9cuin), one of the largest ever recorded in humans.[12] Both Neanderthal and human infants measure about 400cm3 (24cuin).[16]
The Neanderthal brain had different growth and development rates than modern humans, especially in the orbitofrontal cortex (associated with decision making), parietal and temporal lobes (language processing and memory), and the cerebellum (motor functions). All of these regions are proportionally smaller in Neanderthals, and diverge in growth pattern at what would be a critical period in modern human neurological development.[17][18][19][20] Altogether, such differences, while slight, may underlie the differences in Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal behaviour including sociality, technological innovation, and artistic output in the archaeological record.[21]
The neck vertebrae of Neanderthals are thicker from the front to the rear and transversely than those of (most) modern humans. This may have improved stability of the larger head.[22]
The Neanderthal chest was deep and wide, with a proportionally expansive thoracic cavity, and possibly better lung performance. This was caused by longer, straighter ribs, and more dorsally (towards the head) orientated transverse processes on the vertebrae (where the rib connects to the spine). The latter caused the vertebrae to protrude farther into the ribcage (invagination).[23] To support the wider lower thorax, the sacrum (where the pelvis connects to the spine) was more vertically inclined, and the pelvis was wider.[24] This also caused the lumbar vertebrae (lower spine) to be less curved (hypolordosis, "flatback"), except for possibly the 5th lumbar vertebra.[23][25] Though the skeleton of ancient Homo is poorly documented, because H. ergaster specimens over 1 million years old (namely Turkana Boy) seem to have had a similar physiology, it is possible a wide thorax is normal for Homo. The narrower thorax of modern humans may be a unique adaptation associated with the adoption of endurance running.[23][26]
The limbs are proportionally short, which has traditionally been explained as a "hyper-arctic" adaptation (Allen's rule). A similar trend is also observed in modern Inuit and Siberian Yupik populations.[27][28][29][30] Neanderthals in more temperate climates—such as Iberia—still retain the "hyperarctic" physique.[31] The shorter limbs, combined with evidence of a stronger respiratory system and a faster metabolism fueling more fast-twitch muscle fibres, could altogether also be explained as adaptations for sprinting.[32][23] Neanderthals were probably not as adept at endurance running as modern humans given the expanded thorax and long heel bones.[32][33]
Neanderthals had proportionately shorter thumbs and index fingers, but this does not seem to have negatively impacted dexterity. Bone trauma indicates Neanderthals habitually made use of a strong, squeezing grip.[34] Like modern humans, Neanderthals seem to have exhibited handedness, generally preferring the right hand.[35]
Size
In a sample of 45 Neanderthal long bones from 14 men and 7 women, the average height was 164 to 168cm (5ft 5in to 5ft 6in) for males and 152 to 156cm (5ft 0in to 5ft 1in) for females.[36] The fossil record shows that adult Neanderthals varied from about 147.5 to 177cm (4ft 10in to 5ft 10in) in height.[37]
For comparison, the average height of 20 male and 10 female Cro-Magnons is, respectively, 176.2cm (5ft 9in) and 162.9cm (5ft 4in), although this decreases by 10cm (4in) nearer the end of the Upper Palaeolithic based on 21 males and 15 females.[38] The average height in the year 1900 was 163cm (5ft 4in) and 152.7cm (5ft 0in), respectively.[39]
For Neanderthal weight, a sample of 26 specimens found an average of 77.6kg (171lb) for males and 66.4kg (146lb) for females.[40] Using 76kg (168lb), the body mass index for Neanderthal males was calculated to be 26.9–28.2, which in modern humans correlates to being overweight. This indicates a very robust build.[36] The Neanderthal LEPR gene concerned with storing fat and body heat production is similar to that of the woolly mammoth, and so was likely an adaptation for cold climate.[41]
Biology
Vision
The orbits (eye sockets) of Neanderthals, and possibly also the eyeballs, were bigger than those of Cro-Magnons and modern humans. It is unclear how this could relate to vision.[42] In modern humans, eye socket size does not correlate with eyeball size; their volumes instead seem to be most influenced by the frontal lobe pushing into the area. In Neanderthals, the separation of the orbits from the frontal lobe is about midway what is seen in H. heidelbergensis and modern humans.[43] Neurologically, Neanderthals had a proportionally large occipital lobe compared to Cro-Magnons, associated with visual processing.[42][44] Genetically, colour blindness (which may enhance mesopic vision in low-light conditions) is typically correlated with high-latitude populations, and the Neanderthals from Vindija Cave, Croatia, had some substitutions in the Opsin genes which could have influenced colour vision.[45]
The functional implications of these traits are inconclusive, but altogether, they could indicate a preference for activity in dimmer light conditions. This may have been advantageous in northerly latitudes where daylight hours are much shorter especially in winter, and low-light or nighttime hunting would enhance ambush tactics when pursuing large game.[45] Neanderthal-derived alleles near ASB1 and EXOC6 are associated with being an evening person, narcolepsy and day-time napping.[46]
The Neanderthal piriform aperture (nose hole) and nasal cavity are much wider and bigger than in modern humans. Assuming the nasal passages took up the entire nasal cavity, this has normally been explained as an adaptation to warm greater quantities of cold air to fuel their assumed heightened metabolism and activity levels compared to modern humans.[47] A large nose does not necessarily equate to a better sense of smell, and neurologically, because the olfactory bulbs are smaller, Neanderthals may have had a poorer sense of smell and olfactory memory than modern humans.[48]
In modern humans, high-latitude populations typically instead have taller, narrower piriform apertures and noses, which decrease air intake per breath, but improve turbulence within the nose to moisten and warm air. Since Neanderthals had a much longer skull and face, and consequently probably longer nasal passages, air may have been warmed enough after simply crossing such a distance to reach the lungs, not requiring the additional nasal turbulence.[49]
The longer, straighter ribs and implied wider mid-lower thorax (where the ribcage is) similarly indicate stronger breathing in the lower thorax, a larger diaphragm, and possibly greater average lung capacity.[24][50][51] The lung capacity of Kebara 2 was estimated to have been 9.04L (2.39USgal), compared to the average human capacity of 6L (1.6USgal) for males and 4.7L (1.2USgal) for females.[24]
In 1971, cognitive scientist Philip Lieberman attempted to reconstruct the Neanderthal vocal tract and concluded that it was similar to that of a modern human newborn. His reconstruction of the Neanderthal vocal tract left Neanderthals incapable of producing a range of speech sounds, due to the large size of the mouth and the small size of the pharyngeal cavity, thus no need for a descended larynx[c] to fit the entire tongue inside the mouth. He concluded that they were anatomically unable to produce the sounds /a/, /i/, /u/, /ɔ/, /g/, and /k/ and thus lacked the capacity for articulate speech, though were still able to speak at a level higher than non-human primates.[53][54][55]
Lieberman's findings have subsequently been debated, especially in light of newer fossil discoveries and re-analyses. The 1983 discovery of a Neanderthal hyoid bone—used in speech production in humans—in Kebara 2 is almost identical to that of humans, which could suggest Neanderthals were capable of speech. Still, it is not possible to accurately reconstruct the entire vocal tract with just the hyoid.[56][57] The Sima de los Huesos fossils, which may be a "pre-Neanderthal" population, also had humanlike hyoid and ear bones.[58] Some studies can reconstruct the Neanderthal vocal apparatus as comparable to that of modern humans, but soft-tissue reconstructions are problematic in general.[59]
The FOXP2 gene in modern humans is associated with speech and language development. FOXP2 was present in Neanderthals,[60] but not the gene's modern human variant.[61] Neurologically, Neanderthals had an expanded Broca's area—operating the formulation of sentences, and speech comprehension, but out of a group of 48 genes believed to affect the neural substrate of language, 11 had different methylation patterns between Neanderthals and modern humans. This could indicate a stronger ability in modern humans than in Neanderthals to express language.[62]
The lack of sunlight may have led to the proliferation of lighter skin in Neanderthals.[46] Genetically, Neanderthals could carry two different variations of BNC2, which in modern populations are associated with lighter or darker skin colour in the UK Biobank.[46] DNA analysis of three Neanderthal females from southeastern Europe indicates that they had brown eyes and dark skin colour. Two had brown hair, and one red hair.[63]
In modern humans, skin and hair colour is regulated by the melanocyte-stimulating hormone—which increases the proportion of eumelanin (black pigment) to phaeomelanin (red pigment)—which is encoded by the MC1R gene. There are five known variants in modern humans of the gene which cause loss-of-function and are associated with light skin and hair colour. None of the variants associated with red hair have been found in Neanderthals, but they carried an additional variant, R307G, which could be associated with pale skin and red hair. The R307G variant was identified in a Neanderthal from Monti Lessini, Italy, and possibly Cueva del Sidrón, Spain.[64][46]
Metabolism
Generally, models on Neanderthal caloric requirements report significantly higher intakes than those of modern humans. They typically assume that Neanderthals had higher basal metabolic rates (BMRs) due to higher muscle mass, faster growth rate, and greater body heat production against the cold.[65][66][67] A higher daily physical activity levels (PALs) is also usually assumed, caused by less efficient foraging techniques than Cro-Magnons, requiring Neanderthals to travel farther and expend more energy daily.[66][67]
Maximum natural lifespan and the timing of adulthood, menopause, and gestation were most likely similar to modern humans.[68]
Based on the growth rates of teeth and tooth enamel, Neanderthals may have matured faster than modern humans.[69][70] The enamel is thinner in Neanderthals, which may have stemmed from a lower long-period line periodicity and a faster extension rate, which resulted in faster tooth crown formation times.[71] Skeletally, the main differences in maturation are the atlas bone in the neck as well as the middle thoracic vertebrae fused about 2 years later in Neanderthals than in modern humans, but this was more likely caused by a difference in anatomy rather than growth rate.[72][73]
In a sample of 669 Neanderthal tooth crowns, 75% suffered some degree of enamel hypoplasia, an indicator of developmental stress perhaps caused by recurrent starvation at a young age while the teeth were forming. Comparing the rate to what is seen in recent Tikiġaġmiut, Neanderthals experienced stresses lasting from two weeks to up to three months.[74][75]
Neanderthals suffered a high rate of traumatic injury, with an estimated 79–94% of specimens showing evidence of healed major trauma, of which 37–52% were severely injured, and 13–19% injured before reaching adulthood.[76] One extreme example is Shanidar 1, who shows signs of an amputation of the right arm likely due to a nonunion after breaking a bone in adolescence, osteomyelitis (a bone infection) on the left clavicle, an abnormal gait, vision problems in the left eye, and possible hearing loss[77] (perhaps swimmer's ear).[78]
In 1995, Trinkaus estimated that about 80% succumbed to their injuries and died before reaching 40, and thus theorised that Neanderthals employed a risky hunting strategy ("rodeo rider" hypothesis).[79] Compared to contemporary modern humans, the rates of cranial trauma are not significantly different (although Neanderthals seem to have had a higher mortality risk),[80] there are few specimens of both Cro-Magnons and Neanderthals who died after the age of 40,[81] and there are overall similar injury patterns between them. In 2012, Trinkaus concluded that Neanderthals may have additionally been injuring themselves in the same way as contemporary humans, such as by interpersonal violence.[82]
A 2016 study looking at 124 Neanderthal specimens argued that high trauma rates were instead caused by animal attacks, and found that about 36% of the sample were victims of bear attacks, 21% big cat attacks, and 17% wolf attacks (totalling 92 positive cases, 74%). There were no cases of hyena attacks, although hyenas still nonetheless probably attacked Neanderthals, at least opportunistically.[83] Such intense predation probably stemmed from common confrontations due to competition over food and cave space, and from Neanderthals hunting these carnivores.[83]
Congenital defects
Low population caused a low genetic diversity and probably inbreeding, which reduced the population's ability to filter out harmful mutations (inbreeding depression). It is unknown how this affected a single Neanderthal's genetic burden and, thus, if this caused a higher rate of birth defects than in modern humans.[84]
The 13 inhabitants of Sidrón Cave collectively exhibited 17 different birth defects likely due to inbreeding or recessive disorders.[85] Likely due to advanced age (60s or 70s), La Chapelle-aux-Saints 1 had signs of Baastrup's disease, affecting the spine, and osteoarthritis.[86] Shanidar 1, who likely died at about 30 or 40, was diagnosed with the most ancient case of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), a degenerative disease which can restrict movement, which, if correct, would indicate a moderately high incidence rate for older Neanderthals.[87]
Neanderthals were subject to several infectious diseases and parasites. Modern humans likely transmitted diseases to them; one possible candidate is the stomach bacteria Helicobacter pylori.[89] The modern human papillomavirus variant 16A may descend from Neanderthal introgression.[90] A Neanderthal at Cueva del Sidrón, Spain, shows evidence of a gastrointestinal Enterocytozoon bieneusi infection.[91] The leg bones of the French La Ferrassie 1 feature lesions that are consistent with periostitis—inflammation of the tissue enveloping the bone—likely a result of hypertrophic osteoarthropathy, which is primarily caused by a chest infection or lung cancer.[88] La Chapelle-aux-Saints 1 has lesions down the length of his spine consistent with brucellosis, probably infected with Brucella abortus while butchering a carcass or eating raw meat.[92]
Neanderthals had a lower cavity rate than modern humans, despite some populations consuming typically cavity-causing foods in great quantity. This could indicate a lack of cavity-causing oral bacteria, namely Streptococcus mutans.[93]
In Neanderthals, the Eustachian tubes (which connect the middle ear to the throat) are flat. In modern humans, as an infant grows, the Eustachian tubes become angled to improve drainage of the middle ear and prevent bacterial infection. The flatness of the Eustachian tubes throughout life may have made Neanderthals more prone to developing ear infections.[94] A 2019 study found that 48% of their 77 Neanderthal skull sample size presented bony growths consistent with swimmer's ear (inflammation of the ear canal).[78]
Poisoning
Two 250,000-year-old Neanderthaloid children from Payré, France, present the earliest known cases of lead exposure. They were exposed on two distinct occasions either by eating or drinking contaminated food or water, or inhaling lead-laced smoke from a fire. There are two lead mines within 25km (16mi) of the site.[95]
↑ Inuit groups are often used as modern Neanderthal analogues to study "hyper-arctic" adaptations.
↑ Neanderthals typically present a similar tooth wearing pattern to Greenland Inuit groups, who use their teeth to soften seal hide among other tasks.[8]
↑ The lack of a descended larynx does not necessarily equate to a reduced vowel capacity.[52]
References
↑ Madison, P. (2021). "Brutish Neanderthals: History of a merciless characterization". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. doi:10.1002/evan.21918.
↑ Virchow, R. (1872). "Untersuchung des Neanderthal-Schädels" [Examinations on the Neandertal skull]. Verh Berl Anthrop Ges (in German). 4: 157–165.
1 2 3 Hublin, J.-J. (2002). "Climatic Changes, Paleogeography, and the Evolution of the Neandertals". In Akazawa, T.; Aoki, K.; Bar-Yosef, O. (eds.). Neandertals and Modern Humans in Western Asia. doi:10.1007/b109961. ISBN978-0-306-45924-5.
↑ O'Connor, C. F.; Franciscus, R. G.; Holton, N. E. (2005). "Bite force production capability and efficiency in Neandertals and modern humans". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 127 (2): 129–151. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20025. PMID15558614.
↑ Holloway, R. L. (1985). "The poor brain of Homo sapiens neanderthalensis: see what you please". In Delson, E. (ed.). Ancestors: The hard evidence. Alan R. Liss. ISBN978-0-471-84376-4.
↑ Allen, J. S.; Damasio, H.; Grabowski, T. J. (2002). "Normal neuroanatomical variation in the human brain: an MRI-volumetric study". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 118 (4): 341–358. doi:10.1002/ajpa.10092. PMID12124914. S2CID21705705.
↑ Coolidge, Frederick L.; Wynn, Thomas; Overmann, Karenleigh A. (2024). "The Expert Neandertal Mind and Brain, Revisited". In Wynn, Thomas; Overmann, Karenleigh A.; Coolidge, Frederick L. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Archaeology. Oxford University Press. pp.131–149. ISBN9780192895950.
↑ García-Martínez, D.; Martelli, S.; Torres-Tamayo, N.; Jiménez-Arenas, J. M.; González Martín, A.; Campo, M.; Cambra-Moo, O.; Lois-Zlolniski, S.; Nalla, S.; Gimeno, J. A. S.; Bastir, M. (2020). "Sexual dimorphism in the vertebral wedging of the human lumbar vertebrae and its importance as a comparative framework for understanding the wedging pattern of Neanderthals". Quaternary International. 566–567: 224–232. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2020.05.054. hdl:10486/715654.
↑ Bastir, M.; García-Martínez, D.; Torres-Tamayo, N.; Palancar, C. A.; Beyer, B.; Barash, A.; Villa, C.; Sanchis-Gimeno, J. A.; Riesco-López, A.; Nalla, S.; Torres-Sánchez, I.; García-Río, F.; Been, E.; Gómez-Olivencia, A.; Haeusler, M.; Williams, S. A.; Spoor, F. (2020). "Rib cage anatomy in Homo erectus suggests a recent evolutionary origin of modern human body shape". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 4: 1178–1187. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1240-4.
↑ Trinkaus, E. (1981). "Neanderthal limb proportions and cold adaptation". In Stringer, C. B. (ed.). Aspects of human evolution. Taylor and Francis Ltd.
↑ Raichlen, D.; Armstrong, H.; Lieberman, D. E. (2011). "Calcaneus length determines running economy: Implications for endurance running performance in modern humans and Neandertals". Journal of Human Evolution. 60 (3): 299–308. Bibcode:2011JHumE..60..299R. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.11.002. PMID21269660.
↑ Bardo, A.; Moncel, M.-H.; Dunmore, C. J.; Kivell, T. L.; Pouydebat, E.; Cornette, R. (2020). "The implications of thumb movements for Neanderthal and modern human manipulation". Scientific Reports. 10 (19323). doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75694-2. hdl:21.11116/0000-0007-A185-C.
↑ Uomini, N. T. (2011). "Handedness in Neanderthals". Neanderthal Lifeways, Subsistence and Technology. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0415-2_14. ISBN978-94-007-3525-5.
1 2 Helmuth, H. (1998). "Body height, body mass and surface area of the Neanderthals". Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie. 82 (1): 1–12. JSTOR25757530. PMID9850627.
↑ Formicola, V.; Giannecchini, M. (1998). "Evolutionary trends of stature in Upper Paleolithic and Mesolithic Europe". Journal of Human Evolution. 36 (3): 325. doi:10.1006/jhev.1998.0270. PMID10074386.
↑ Boë, L.-J.; Heim, J.-L.; Honda, K.; Maeda, S. (2002). "The potential Neandertal vowel space was as large as that of modern humans". Journal of Phonetics. 30 (3): 465–484. doi:10.1006/jpho.2002.0170. S2CID16685699.
↑ Lieberman, P. (2007). "Current views on Neanderthal speech capabilities: A reply to Boe et al. (2002)". Journal of Phonetics. 35 (4): 552–563. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2005.07.002.
↑ J.T. Laitman; B. Johansson (1990). "The Kebara hyoid: What can it tell us about the evolution of the hominid vocal tract". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 81 (2): 254. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330810204.
↑ Boë, L.J.; Heim, J.L.; Honda, K.; Maeda, S.; Badin, P.; Abry, C. (2007). "The vocal tract of newborn humans and Neanderthals: Acoustic capabilities and consequences for the debate on the origin of language. A reply to Lieberman". Journal of Phonetics. 35 (4): 564–581. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2007.06.006.
↑ Cerqueira, C. C.; Piaxão-Côrtes, V. R.; Zambra, F. M. B.; Hünemeier, T.; Bortolini, M. (2012). "Predicting Homo pigmentation phenotype through genomic data: From neanderthal to James Watson". American Journal of Human Biology. 24 (5): 705–709. doi:10.1002/ajhb.22263. PMID22411106. S2CID25853632.
↑ Guatelli-Steinberg D, Larsen CS, Hutchinson DL (2004). "Prevalence and the duration of linear enamel hypoplasia: a comparative study of Neandertals and Inuit foragers". Journal of Human Evolution. 47 (1–2): 65–84. Bibcode:2004JHumE..47...65G. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.05.004. PMID15288524.
↑ Barrett CK, Guatelli-Steinberg D, Sciulli PW (October 2012). "Revisiting dental fluctuating asymmetry in neandertals and modern humans". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 149 (2): 193–204. doi:10.1002/ajpa.22107. PMID22791408.
↑ Crubézy, E.; Trinkaus, E. (1992). "Shanidar 1: a case of hyperostotic disease (DISH) in the middle Paleolithic". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 89 (4): 411–420. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330890402. PMID1463085.
↑ Soltysiak, A. (2012). "Comment: low dental caries rate in Neandertals: the result of diet or the oral flora composition?". Homo. 63 (2): 110–113. doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2012.02.001. PMID22409830.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.