Protecting the Right to Organize Act

Last updated

Protecting the Right to Organize Act
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Long titleTo amend the National Labor Relations Act, the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, and the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, and for other purposes.
Announced inthe 117th United States Congress
Number of co-sponsors213
Legislative history

The Protecting the Right to Organize Act, or PRO Act, is a proposed United States law that would amend previous labor laws such as the National Labor Relations Act, for the purpose of expanding "various labor protections related to employees' rights to organize and collectively bargain in the workplace". It would prevent employers from holding mandatory meetings for the purpose of counteracting labor organization, and would strengthen the legal right of employees to join a labor union. The bill would also permit labor unions to encourage secondary strikes. The PRO Act would weaken "right-to-work" laws, which exist in 27 U.S. states. It would allow the National Labor Relations Board to fine employers for violations of labor law, and would provide compensation to employees involved in such cases.

Contents

Background

The Protecting the Right to Organize Act, also known as the PRO Act, [1] [2] follows a series of past legislation passed by Congress concerning labor rights. A number of landmark bills were passed during the New Deal period, including the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which President Franklin D. Roosevelt considered one of the most important Acts of Congress at the time. [3]

Following the New Deal, a number of bills were passed which restricted the activities of labor unions. Among these was the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (commonly known as the Taft-Hartley Act), which among other things prohibited secondary boycotts and closed shops. [4]

In 2009, the Employee Free Choice Act, another bill which would have amended the National Labor Relations Act, failed to pass. [5] [6]

In the State of California, following the passage of California Assembly Bill 5, Proposition 22 was passed in 2020. Proposition 22 was intended to classify so-called gig workers for app-based companies (such as Lyft, Uber, DoorDash and Postmates) as "independent contractors" rather than full employees. [7]

Content

The PRO Act would amend the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (also known as the Wagner Act), the Taft-Hartley Act, and the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 (also known as the Landrum–Griffin Act). [8]

According to the summary text of the PRO Act, it revises definitions under labor law, permits labor unions to encourage participation in secondary strikes, and prohibits employers from litigating against unions which conduct such secondary strikes:

Among other things, it (1) revises the definitions of employee, supervisor, and employer to broaden the scope of individuals covered by the fair labor standards; (2) permits labor organizations to encourage participation of union members in strikes initiated by employees represented by a different labor organization (i.e., secondary strikes); and (3) prohibits employers from bringing claims against unions that conduct such secondary strikes. [9]

The PRO Act would prevent employees seeking to join a labor union from being fired. [10] It would allow unions to override "right-to-work" laws, allowing labor unions to collect dues from all employees in a workplace, regardless of whether or not they are a member of a labor union. [11] [12] [10] Right-to-work laws exist in 27 U.S. states, and the PRO Act would weaken these laws. [13] [14] [15] It would also prohibit company-sponsored captive audience meetings used to counteract and discourage attempts at labor organization as an unfair labor practice. [16] [17] It prevents an employer from holding citizenship status against an employee. [18] [10] The bill would allow the National Labor Relations Board to fine employers up to $50,000 for every violation of labor law. It would also allow the NLRB to fine employers up to $100,000 in the case of repeat offenses by an employer. [8] It would bring monetary compensation to employees involved in such cases. The PRO Act would classify some workers who are classified now as "independent contractors", instead as "employees". [11] The bill would amend the National Labor Relations Act to define an employee as follows:

"An individual performing any service shall be considered an employee (except as provided in the previous sentence) and not an independent contractor, unless—

"(A) the individual is free from control and direction in connection with the performance of the service, both under the contract for the performance of service and in fact;

"(B) the service is performed outside the usual course of the business of the employer; and

"(C) the individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession, or business of the same nature as that involved in the service performed." [8] [12]

This definitional amendment would allow for certain workers, such as those working in the gig economy, to attain the right to form a labor union or to bargain collectively. [19] [10] This would potentially include those who work for app-based companies such as Uber, DoorDash, or Lyft, and overall could include hundreds of thousands or millions of workers. [2] [15] However, this reclassification applies only to collective bargaining. For other considerations, such as wages or benefits, they would still be treated as independent contractors. [20] The PRO Act would alter union election rules. [21] For example, it would allow unions to hold elections through mail ballots or electronic ballots. [16] The bill would allow for workers to sue employers, and would make it easier for employees to join a union. [22]

Support and opposition

Polling

A poll conducted by Vox and Data for Progress in June 2021 said that 59% of likely U.S. voters supported the PRO Act, and 29% opposed it. [23]

Support

A letter signed by over 100 labor unions, advocacy organizations, churches, and political groups supported the PRO Act. This included but was not limited to the AFL-CIO, EPI, Public Citizen, AFT, Sunrise Movement, CPD, DSA, SEIU, PFAW, CWA, FSP, FoEI, HRW, USW, IWPR, GBCS, IFPTE, NETWORK, Patriotic Millionaires, and Oxfam. [24] Ryan Kekeris, an organizer with the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, said the PRO Act "modernizes and updates a lot of the loopholes and the brokenness of U.S. labor law". [25] Richard Trumka of the AFL-CIO said, "If you really want to correct inequality in this country ... passing the PRO Act is absolutely essential to doing that." [18] The bill has received backing from the Labor Caucus and The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. [26] [27] Joe Biden endorsed the PRO Act, and has called labor law reform one of the top priorities of his administration. [5] [10] [28]

Opposition

At least 150 business groups oppose the PRO Act. [29] Those who oppose it, including Republicans, business groups, and industry groups, have variously said the PRO Act would hurt business and workers, violate privacy rights, give unions too much bargaining power, enable corruption, and would disrespect states' rights. [11] [10] [13] [30] The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a business-oriented lobby group, opposes the PRO Act. [31] [28] Among other opposed organizations are the NRF, NAM, National Restaurant Association, American Hotel & Lodging Association, NFIB, and the NAHB. [18] [32] [29]

Legislative activity

116th Congress

On May 2, 2019, Rep. Robert C Scott (D-VA) introduced H.R. 2474, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019, in the House of Representatives. [33] It had 218 cosponsors. The bill passed in the House of Representatives by a vote of 224 to 194 on May 6, 2020. [11] [34] Seven House Democrats voted against the bill. [35]

On May 2, 2019, Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) introduced S.1306, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019, in the Senate. [36] [37] It was referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. The bill had 41 cosponsors. [36]

117th Congress

On February 4, 2021, Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA-03) introduced the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021 in the House of Representatives. [9] Of the bill's 213 cosponsors, 3 – Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-01), Jeff Van Drew (NJ-02), and Chris Smith (NJ-04) – were Republicans; the other 210 were Democrats.

The bill passed in the House of Representatives by a vote of 225 to 206 on March 9, 2021. Five House Republicans (Brian Fitzpatrick, John Katko, Chris Smith, Jeff Van Drew, and Don Young) joined the House Democrats in voting for it, while one Democrat (Henry Cuellar) voted against it. [38] The bill now advances to the U.S. Senate; [28] however, the bill is unlikely to pass as it would require universal Democratic support and 10 Republican crossover votes to pass in case of a filibuster. [10] [ needs update ]

118th Congress

On February 28, 2023, Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA-03) introduced the Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2023 in the House of Representatives. [39]

Legislative history

As of March 8, 2023:

CongressShort titleBill number(s)Date introducedSponsor(s)# of cosponsorsLatest status
116th Congress Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019 H.R. 2474 May 2, 2019 Robert C. Scott

(D-VA)

218Passed in the House (224 – 194). [11]
S.1306 May 5, 2019 Patty Murray

(D-WA)

41Died in committee.
117th Congress Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021 H.R.824 February 4, 2021 Robert C. Scott

(D-VA)

213Passed in the House (225 – 206). [18]
S.420 February 24, 2021 Patty Murray

(D-WA)

46Died in committee.
118th Congress Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2023 H.R. 20 February 28, 2023 Robert C. Scott

(D-VA)

205Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
S.567 February 28, 2023 Bernie Sanders

(I-VT)

47Passed Committee. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Labor Relations Act of 1935</span> 1935 U.S. federal labor law regulating the rights of workers and unions

The National Labor Relations Act of 1935, also known as the Wagner Act, is a foundational statute of United States labor law that guarantees the right of private sector employees to organize into trade unions, engage in collective bargaining, and take collective action such as strikes. Central to the act was a ban on company unions. The act was written by Senator Robert F. Wagner, passed by the 74th United States Congress, and signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taft–Hartley Act</span> 1947 U.S. federal law regulating labor unions

The Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, better known as the Taft–Hartley Act, is a United States federal law that restricts the activities and power of labor unions. It was enacted by the 80th United States Congress over the veto of President Harry S. Truman, becoming law on June 23, 1947.

In the context of labor law in the United States, the term "right-to-work laws" refers to state laws that prohibit union security agreements between employers and labor unions which require employees who are not union members to contribute to the costs of union representation. Unlike the right to work definition as a human right in international law, U.S. right-to-work laws do not aim to provide a general guarantee of employment to people seeking work but rather guarantee an employee's right to refrain from paying or being a member of a labor union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Occupational Safety and Health Act (United States)</span> United States labor law

The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 is a US labor law governing the federal law of occupational health and safety in the private sector and federal government in the United States. It was enacted by Congress in 1970 and was signed by President Richard Nixon on December 29, 1970. Its main goal is to ensure that employers provide employees with an environment free from recognized hazards, such as exposure to toxic chemicals, excessive noise levels, mechanical dangers, heat or cold stress, or unsanitary conditions. The Act created the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Union busting</span> Efforts to prevent or hinder unionization among workers

Union busting is a range of activities undertaken to disrupt or prevent the formation of trade unions or their attempts to grow their membership in a workplace.

Card check, also called majority sign-up, is a method for employees to organize into a labor union in which a majority of employees in a bargaining unit sign authorization forms, or "cards", stating they wish to be represented by the union. Since the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) became law in 1935, card check has been an alternative to the National Labor Relations Board's (NLRB) election process. Card check and election are both overseen by the National Labor Relations Board. The difference is that with card sign-up, employees sign authorization cards stating they want a union, the cards are submitted to the NLRB and if more than 50% of the employees submitted cards, the NLRB requires the employer to recognize the union. The NLRA election process is an additional step with the NLRB conducting a secret ballot election after authorization cards are submitted. In both cases the employer never sees the authorization cards or any information that would disclose how individual employees voted.

The Employee Free Choice Act is the name for several legislative bills on US labor law which have been proposed and sometimes introduced into one or both chambers of the U.S. Congress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act of 2007</span> Proposed United States legislation

The Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act of 2007, introduced in the 110th Congress(H.R. 980, S. 2123), proposed to establish minimum standards for state collective bargaining laws for public safety officers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938</span> United States wage law

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 29 U.S.C. § 203 (FLSA) is a United States labor law that creates the right to a minimum wage, and "time-and-a-half" overtime pay when people work over forty hours a week. It also prohibits employment of minors in "oppressive child labor". It applies to employees engaged in interstate commerce or employed by an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, unless the employer can claim an exemption from coverage. The Act was enacted by the 75th Congress and signed into law by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1938.

The Save Our Secret Ballot, Inc. (SOS) is a 501(c)(4) conservative advocacy organization created to promote states to pass constitutional amendments that would ban card check legislation. Former U.S. Congressman Ernest Istook (R-OK) is Chairman of the National Advisory Board.

The Employee Rights Act (S.1774), or ERA, is a bill re-introduced to the 115th Congress in the United States Senate on September 7, 2017, by Sen. Orrin G. Hatch [R-UT] and 14 co-sponsors. The bill was referred to the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. It is the successor to bills first introduced in the 112th Congress of the same name, also sponsored by Sen. Hatch and then-Rep. Tim Scott of South Carolina.

A Domestic Workers' Bill of Rights is legislation designed to grant basic labor protections to domestic workers. These laws are supported by the National Domestic Workers Alliance, a labor advocacy group founded in 2007. The first such law took effect in New York state on November 29, 2010. Among other rights, this law gave domestic workers the right to overtime pay, a day of rest every seven days, three paid days of rest each year, protection under the state human rights law, and a special cause of action for domestic workers who suffer sexual or racial harassment.

The Workplace Democracy Act is a proposed US labor law, that has been sponsored by Bernie Sanders and re-introduced from 1992 to 2018. Among its different forms, it would have removed obstacles to employers making collective agreements, established an impartial National Public Employment Relations Commission to support fair collective bargaining, required that pensions plans are jointly managed by employee and employer representatives, changed the definition of an "employee" to ensure every person who works for other people has labor rights, and repeal all "right to work" laws.

The Butch Lewis Act is an act of the United States Congress that would allow the United States Treasury to provide financial assistance to failing multiemployer pension plans. This assistance would come in the form of grants that would not need to be repaid to the Department of Treasury and would allow retirees to receive the entirety of their pension benefits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act</span> Proposed law banning most pre-dispute binding arbitration agreements

The Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal (FAIR) Act of 2022 is proposed legislation in the US Congress. The comprehensive legislation would prohibit pre-dispute, forced arbitration agreements from being valid or enforceable if it requires forced arbitration of an employment, consumer, or civil rights claim against a corporation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Families First Coronavirus Response Act</span> 2020 US federal law, "Phase 2" of pandemic relief

The Families First Coronavirus Response Act is an Act of Congress meant to respond to the economic impacts of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The act provides funding for free coronavirus testing, 14-day paid leave for American workers affected by the pandemic, and increased funding for food stamps.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pregnant Workers Fairness Act</span> 2022 United States federal law

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act is a United States law meant to eliminate discrimination and ensure workplace accommodations for workers with known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition. It applies to employers having fifteen or more employees. Originally a stand-alone bill first introduced in 2012, the bill was included as Division II of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, which was passed by Congress on December 27, 2022, and signed by President Joe Biden on December 29, 2022. The bill went into force on June 27, 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Right to sit</span> Policies granting the right to be granted suitable seating at work

The right to sit refers to laws or policies granting workers the right to be granted suitable seating at the workplace. Jurisdictions that have enshrined "right to sit" laws or policies include the United Kingdom, Jamaica, South Africa, Eswatini, Tanzania, Uganda, Lesotho, Malaysia, Brazil, Israel, Ireland, the Indian states of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, the Canadian province of Newfoundland and Labrador, and the British overseas territory of Gibraltar and Montserrat. Almost all states of the United States and Australia, as well as the majority of Canadian provinces passed right to sit legislation for women workers between 1881 and 1917. US states with current right to sit legislation include California, Florida, Massachusetts, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. A right to sit provision is included in the International Labour Organization's Hygiene Convention, 1964; the convention being ratified by 51 countries as of 2014. Local jurisdictions with right to sit laws include Portland, Oregon, St. Louis, Missouri and London's Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea.

The right to sit in the United States refers to state and local legislation guaranteeing workers the right to sit at work when standing is not necessary. The right to sit was a pillar of the early labor movement. Between 1881 and 1917, almost all states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico had passed legislation concerning suitable seating for workers. These laws were enacted during the Progressive Era, spearheaded by women workers in the labor movement. The original texts of these laws almost always applied only to female workers. Most states with right to sit laws have subsequently amended their legislation to include all workers regardless of sex. Some states allow seating accommodations for workers who are minors, disabled, or pregnant. Disabled workers who qualify can request seating as a "reasonable accommodation" under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Pregnant workers can request seating under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.

A captive audience meeting is a mandatory meeting during working hours, organized by an employer with the purpose of discouraging employees from organizing or joining a labor union. It is considered a union busting tactic. Critics allege that captive audience meetings are used to intimidate workers and spread misinformation; employees can be fired for failing to participate in the meeting or for asking questions. In the United States, the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (NLRA) broadly permits captive audience meetings but does not allow them to be held in the final 24 hours prior to a union election. Employers defend the practice as protected free speech; critics view the practice as an infringement on workers' rights not to listen.

References

  1. Brown, Ryan (October 18, 2021). "Legislative Notebook: Labor takes spotlight nationwide amid 'Striketober'". Williamsport Sun-Gazette . Retrieved October 24, 2021.
  2. 1 2 Santucci, Jeanine (March 9, 2021). "House passes sweeping pro-union bill that would reform labor laws". USA Today . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  3. Samuel, Howard D. (December 2000). "Troubled passage: the labor movement and the Fair Labor Standards Act" (PDF). U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics . Retrieved March 9, 2021.
  4. "1947 Taft-Hartley Substantive Provisions | National Labor Relations Board". www.nlrb.gov. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  5. 1 2 "A Biden Board at the NLRB: What to Expect and When". The National Law Review . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  6. Yeselson, Rich (2021). "Union Power After the Election". Dissent . 68 (1): 72. doi:10.1353/dss.2021.0011. ISSN   1946-0910. S2CID   234337233.
  7. "Proposition 22 | Official Voter Information Guide | California Secretary of State". voterguide.sos.ca.gov. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  8. 1 2 3 "Text – H.R.842 – 117th Congress (2021–2022): Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021". www.congress.gov. March 8, 2021. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  9. 1 2 "H.R.842 – 117th Congress (2021–2022): Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021". Congress.gov. March 8, 2021. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Fandos, Nicholas (March 10, 2021). "House Passes Labor Rights Expansion, but Senate Chances Are Slim". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Rosenberg, Eli. "House passes bill to rewrite labor laws and strengthen unions". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  12. 1 2 "The Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act Gains Momentum". The National Law Review . March 9, 2021. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  13. 1 2 Beggin, Riley (March 9, 2021). "Major change to U.S. labor law clears House; faces headwinds in Senate". The Detroit News . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  14. Lang, Amara Omeokwe and Hannah (January 22, 2021). "Labor Groups Push Biden Administration on Union-Friendly Priorities". Wall Street Journal. ISSN   0099-9660 . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  15. 1 2 Rosenberg, Eli. "Congress's most ambitious attempt to strengthen unions in years is set for a House vote next week". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  16. 1 2 "Landmark Labor Law Overhaul Passes House but Senate Fate Unclear". Bloomberg Law . March 9, 2021. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  17. Schiffer, Zoe; Kelly, Makena (May 11, 2021). "The PRO Act would reshape the tech industry — will it get the chance?". The Verge . Retrieved October 24, 2021.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Gonyea, Don (March 9, 2021). "House Democrats Pass Bill That Would Protect Worker Organizing Efforts". NPR . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  19. Ciciora, Phil. "Do labor laws need to be modernized with rise of gig economy?". Illinois News Bureau. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  20. Asher-Schapiro, Avi (July 22, 2021). "Uber, Lyft drivers strike to win labor rights for U.S. gig workers". Reuters . Retrieved August 19, 2021.
  21. Goodkind, Nicole (March 31, 2021). "Here's how the PRO Act would impact freelance and gig workers". Fortune . Retrieved October 24, 2021.
  22. Campbell, Alexia Fernández (May 14, 2019). "Democrats have an ambitious plan to save American labor unions". Vox. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  23. Birenbaum, Gabby (June 16, 2021). "Poll: A majority of voters support the PRO Act". Vox . Retrieved October 24, 2021.
  24. "Coalition letter in support of the Protecting the Right to Organize Act". Economic Policy Institute . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  25. Jones, Sarah (March 13, 2021). "What Is the PRO Act?". New York . Retrieved October 24, 2021.
  26. "Labor Caucus Endorses Slate of Labor Legislation". Congressman Mark Pocan. January 29, 2021. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  27. "VOTE YES on H.R. 842, the Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021". The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  28. 1 2 3 Talbot, Haley; Tsirkin, Julie (March 9, 2021). "House passes 'Protect the 'Right to Organize Act,' 225-206, sends bill to Senate". NBC News . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  29. 1 2 Oprysko, Caitlin (March 3, 2021). "Business orgs ask lawmakers to oppose labor bill". POLITICO. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  30. Beggin, Riley. "Republicans invoke UAW scandal in opposing pro-union legislation". The Detroit News . Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  31. "Stop The PRO Act". U.S. Chamber of Commerce. July 16, 2019. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  32. "NAM Pushes Back on PRO Act". NAM. February 26, 2021. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  33. "Text – H.R.2474 – 116th Congress (2019–2020): Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019". www.congress.gov. February 10, 2020. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  34. "Actions – H.R.2474 – 116th Congress (2019–2020): Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019". www.congress.gov. February 10, 2020. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  35. Garcia, Gilbert (February 13, 2020). "Union protest targets Cuellar for vote against PRO Act". San Antonio Express-News . Retrieved October 24, 2021.
  36. 1 2 Murray, Patty (May 2, 2019). "Actions – S.1306 – 116th Congress (2019–2020): Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019". www.congress.gov. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  37. "Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2019 (2019 – S. 1306)". GovTrack.us. Retrieved March 10, 2021.
  38. "Roll Call 70 Roll Call 70, Bill Number: H. R. 842, 117th Congress, 1st Session". Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives. March 9, 2021. Retrieved March 21, 2021.
  39. "H.R.20 - 118th Congress (2023-2024): Richard L. Trumka Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2023". Congress.gov. February 28, 2023.

PD-icon.svg This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the United States Government .