Resonant interaction

Last updated August 23, 2024

In nonlinear systems a resonant interaction is the interaction of three or more waves, usually but not always of small amplitude. Resonant interactions occur when a simple set of criteria coupling wave vectors and the dispersion equation are met. The simplicity of the criteria make technique popular in multiple fields. Its most prominent and well-developed forms appear in the study of gravity waves, but also finds numerous applications from astrophysics and biology to engineering and medicine. Theoretical work on partial differential equations provides insights into chaos theory; there are curious links to number theory. Resonant interactions allow waves to (elastically) scatter, diffuse or to become unstable.^[1] Diffusion processes are responsible for the eventual thermalization of most nonlinear systems; instabilities offer insight into high-dimensional chaos and turbulence.

Discussion

The underlying concept is that when the sum total of the energy and momentum of several vibrational modes sum to zero, they are free to mix together via nonlinearities in the system under study. Modes for which the energy and momentum do not sum to zero cannot interact, as this would imply a violation of energy/momentum conservation. The momentum of a wave is understood to be given by its wave vector $k$ and its energy $\omega$ follows from the dispersion relation for the system.

For example, for three waves in continuous media, the resonant condition is conventionally written as the requirement that $k_{1}\pm k_{2}\pm k_{3}=0$ and also $\omega _{1}\pm \omega _{2}\pm \omega _{3}=0$ , the minus sign being taken depending on how energy is redistributed among the waves. For waves in discrete media, such as in computer simulations on a lattice, or in (nonlinear) solid-state systems, the wave vectors are quantized, and the normal modes can be called phonons. The Brillouin zone defines an upper bound on the wave vector, and waves can interact when they sum to integer multiples of the Brillouin vectors (Umklapp scattering).

Although three-wave systems provide the simplest form of resonant interactions in waves, not all systems have three-wave interactions. For example, the deep-water wave equation, a continuous-media system, does not have a three-wave interaction.^[2] The Fermi–Pasta–Ulam–Tsingou problem, a discrete-media system, does not have a three-wave interaction. It does have a four-wave interaction, but this is not enough to thermalize the system; that requires a six-wave interaction.^[3] As a result, the eventual thermalization time goes as the inverse eighth power of the coupling—clearly, a very long time for weak coupling—thus allowing the famous FPUT recurrences to dominate on "normal" time scales.

Hamiltonian formulation

In many cases, the system under study can be readily expressed in a Hamiltonian formalism. When this is possible, a set of manipulations can be applied, having the form of a generalized, non-linear Fourier transform. These manipulations are closely related to the inverse scattering method.

A particularly simple example can be found in the treatment of deep water waves.^[4]^[2] In such a case, the system can be expressed in terms of a Hamiltonian, formulated in terms of canonical coordinates $p,q$ . To avoid notational confusion, write $\psi ,\phi$ for these two; they are meant to be conjugate variables satisfying Hamilton's equation. These are to be understood as functions of the configuration space coordinates ${\vec {x}},t$ , i.e. functions of space and time. Taking the Fourier transform, write

{\hat {\psi }}({\vec {k}})=\int e^{-i{\vec {k}}\cdot {\vec {x}}}\;\psi ({\vec {x}})\;dx

and likewise for ${\hat {\phi }}({\vec {k}})$ . Here, ${\vec {k}}$ is the wave vector. When "on shell", it is related to the angular frequency $\omega$ by the dispersion relation. The ladder operators follow in the canonical fashion:

{\hat {\phi }}({\vec {k}})={\sqrt {2f(\omega )}}\;\;\left(a_{k}+a_{-k}^{*}\right)

{\hat {\psi }}({\vec {k}})=-i{\sqrt {\frac {2}{f(\omega )}}}\;\;\left(a_{k}-a_{-k}^{*}\right)

with $2f(\omega )$ some function of the angular frequency. The $a,a^{*}$ correspond to the normal modes of the linearized system. The Hamiltonian (the energy) can now be written in terms of these raising and lowering operators (sometimes called the "action density variables") as

H=H_{0}(a,a^{*})+\epsilon H_{1}(a,a^{*})

Here, the first term $H_{0}(a,a^{*})$ is quadratic in $a,a^{*}$ and represents the linearized theory, while the non-linearities are captured in $H_{1}(a,a^{*})$ , which is cubic or higher-order.

Given the above as the starting point, the system is then decomposed into "free" and "bound" modes.^[3]^[2] The bound modes have no independent dynamics of their own; for example, the higher harmonics of a soliton solution are bound to the fundamental mode, and cannot interact. This can be recognized by the fact that they do not follow the dispersion relation, and have no resonant interactions. In this case, canonical transformations are applied, with the goal of eliminating terms that are non-interacting, leaving free modes. That is, one re-writes $a\to a^{\prime }=a+{\mathcal {O}}(\epsilon )$ and likewise for $a^{*}$ , and rewrites the system in terms of these new, "free" (or at least, freer) modes. Properly done, this leaves $H_{1}$ expressed only with terms that are resonantly interacting. If $H_{1}$ is cubic, these are then the three-wave terms; if quartic, these are the four-wave terms, and so on. Canonical transformations can be repeated to obtain higher-order terms, as long as the lower-order resonant interactions are not damaged, and one skillfully avoids the small divisor problem,^[5] which occurs when there are near-resonances. The terms themselves give the rate or speed of the mixing, and are sometimes called transfer coefficients or the transfer matrix. At the conclusion, one obtains an equation for the time evolution of the normal modes, corrected by scattering terms. Picking out one of the modes out of the bunch, call it $a_{1}$ below, the time evolution has the generic form

{\frac {\partial a_{1}}{\partial t}}+i\omega _{1}=-i\int dk_{2}\cdots dk_{n}\;T_{1\cdots n}\;a_{2}^{\pm }\cdots a_{n}^{\pm }\;\delta _{1\pm 2\pm \cdots \pm n}

with $T_{1\cdots n}$ the transfer coefficients for the n-wave interaction, and the $\delta _{1\pm 2\pm \cdots \pm n}=\delta (k_{1}\pm k_{2}\pm \cdots \pm k_{n})$ capturing the notion of the conservation of energy/momentum implied by the resonant interaction. Here $a_{k}^{\pm }$ is either $a$ or $a^{*}$ as appropriate. For deep-water waves, the above is called the Zakharov equation, named after Vladimir E. Zakharov.

History

Resonant interactions were first considered and described by Henri Poincaré in the 19th century, in the analysis of perturbation series describing 3-body planetary motion. The first-order terms in the perturbative series can be understood for form a matrix; the eigenvalues of the matrix correspond to the fundamental modes in the perturbated solution. Poincare observed that in many cases, there are integer linear combinations of the eigenvalues that sum to zero; this is the original resonant interaction. When in resonance, energy transfer between modes can keep the system in a stable phase-locked state. However, going to second order is challenging in several ways. One is that degenerate solutions are difficult to diagonalize (there is no unique vector basis for the degenerate space). A second issue is that differences appear in the denominator of the second and higher order terms in the perturbation series; small differences lead to the famous small divisor problem. These can be interpreted as corresponding to chaotic behavior. To roughly summarize, precise resonances lead to scattering and mixing; approximate resonances lead to chaotic behavior.

Applications

Resonant interactions have found broad utility in many areas. Below is a selected list of some of these, indicating the broad variety of domains to which the ideas have been applied.

In deep water, there are no three-wave interactions between surface gravity waves; the shape of the dispersion relation prohibits this. There is, however, a four-wave interaction; it describes the experimentally-observed interaction of obliquely moving waves very well (i.e. with no free parameters or adjustments).^[6] The Hamiltonian formalism for deep water waves was given by Zakharov in 1968^[4]
Rogue waves are unusually large and unexpected oceanic surface waves; solitons are implicated, and specifically, the resonant interactions between three of them.^[7]
Rossby waves, also known as planetary waves, describe both the jet-stream and oceanic waves that move along the thermocline. There are three-wave resonant interactions of Rossby waves, and so they are commonly studied as such.^[8]
The resonant interactions of Rossby waves have been observed to have a connection to Diophantine equations, normally considered to be a topic in number theory.^[9] Constructive methods for solving Diophantine equations appearing in the context of the resonant wave interactions of various types (including Rossby waves) have been first presented by Kartashova in 1990 and can be found in ^[10]

During summertime in shallow coastal waters, low-frequency sound-waves have been observed to propagate in an anomalous fashion. The anomalies are time-dependent, anisotropic, and can exhibit abnormally large attenuation. Resonant interaction between acoustic waves and soliton internal waves have been proposed as the source of these anomalies.^[11]
In astrophysics, non-linear resonant interactions between warping and oscillations in the relativistically spinning accretion disk around a black hole have been proposed as the origin of observed kilohertz quasi-periodic oscillations in low-mass x-ray binaries.^[12] The non-linearity providing the coupling is due to general relativity; accretion disks in Newtonian gravity, e.g. Saturn's rings do not have this particular kind of resonant interaction (they do demonstrate many other kinds of resonances, however).
During spacecraft atmospheric entry, the high speed of the spacecraft heats air to a red-hot plasma. This plasma is impenetrable to radio waves, leading to a radio communications blackout. Resonant interactions that mechanically (acoustically) couple the spacecraft to the plasma have been investigated as a means of punching a hole or tunneling out the radiowave, thus re-establishing radio communications during a critical flight phase.^[13]
Resonant interactions have been proposed as a way of coupling the high spatial resolution of electron microscopes to the high temporal resolution of lasers, allowing precision microscopy in both space and time.^[14] The resonant interaction is between free electrons and bound electrons at the surface of a material.
Charged particles can be accelerated by resonant interaction with electromagnetic waves.^[15] Scalar particles (neutral atoms) described by the Klein–Gordon equation can be accelerated by gravitational waves (e.g. those emitted from black hole mergers.)^[16]
The physical basis for macromolecular bioactivity — molecular recognition — the protein-protein and protein-DNA interaction, is poorly understood. Such interactions are known to be electromagnetic (obviously, its "chemistry"), but are otherwise poorly understood (its not "just hydrogen bonds"). The Informational Spectrum Method (ISM) describes such molecular binding in terms of resonant interactions.^[17]^[18] Given a protein, the valence electrons on various amino acids delocalize, and have some freedom of movement within the protein. Their behavior can be modelled in a relatively straightforward way with an electron-ion pseudopotential (EIIP), one for each distinct amino acid or nucleotide. The result of modelling provides spectra, which can be accessed experimentally, thus confirming numerical results. In addition, the model provides the needed dispersion relation from which the resonant interactions can be deduced. Resonant interactions are obtained by computing cross-spectra. Since resonant interactions mix states (and thus alter entropy), recognition might proceed through entropic forces.
Resonant interaction between high-frequency electromagnetic fields and cancer cells has been proposed as a method for treating cancer.^[19]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nonlinear optics</span> Branch of physics

Nonlinear optics (NLO) is the branch of optics that describes the behaviour of light in nonlinear media, that is, media in which the polarization density P responds non-linearly to the electric field E of the light. The non-linearity is typically observed only at very high light intensities (when the electric field of the light is >10⁸ V/m and thus comparable to the atomic electric field of ~10¹¹ V/m) such as those provided by lasers. Above the Schwinger limit, the vacuum itself is expected to become nonlinear. In nonlinear optics, the superposition principle no longer holds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Resonance</span> Tendency to oscillate at certain frequencies

In physics, resonance refers to a wide class of phenomena that arise as a result of matching temporal or spatial periods of oscillatory objects. For an oscillatory dynamical system driven by a time-varying external force, resonance occurs when the frequency of the external force coincides with the natural frequency of the system. Resonance can occur in various systems, such as mechanical, electrical, or acoustic systems, and it is desirable in certain applications, such as musical instruments or radio receivers. Resonance can also be undesirable, leading to excessive vibrations or even structural failure in some cases.

In physics, Landau damping, named after its discoverer, Soviet physicist Lev Davidovich Landau (1908–68), is the effect of damping of longitudinal space charge waves in plasma or a similar environment. This phenomenon prevents an instability from developing, and creates a region of stability in the parameter space. It was later argued by Donald Lynden-Bell that a similar phenomenon was occurring in galactic dynamics, where the gas of electrons interacting by electrostatic forces is replaced by a "gas of stars" interacting by gravitational forces. Landau damping can be manipulated exactly in numerical simulations such as particle-in-cell simulation. It was proved to exist experimentally by Malmberg and Wharton in 1964, almost two decades after its prediction by Landau in 1946.

In physics, magnetosonic waves, also known as magnetoacoustic waves, are low-frequency compressive waves driven by mutual interaction between an electrically conducting fluid and a magnetic field. They are associated with compression and rarefaction of both the fluid and the magnetic field, as well as with an effective tension that acts to straighten bent magnetic field lines. The properties of magnetosonic waves are highly dependent on the angle between the wavevector and the equilibrium magnetic field and on the relative importance of fluid and magnetic processes in the medium. They only propagate with frequencies much smaller than the ion cyclotron or ion plasma frequencies of the medium, and they are nondispersive at small amplitudes.

Magnetic force microscopy (MFM) is a variety of atomic force microscopy, in which a sharp magnetized tip scans a magnetic sample; the tip-sample magnetic interactions are detected and used to reconstruct the magnetic structure of the sample surface. Many kinds of magnetic interactions are measured by MFM, including magnetic dipole–dipole interaction. MFM scanning often uses non-contact atomic force microscopy (NC-AFM) and is considered to be non-destructive with respect to the test sample. In MFM, the test sample(s) do not need to be electrically conductive to be imaged.

In plasma physics, an electromagnetic electron wave is a wave in a plasma which has a magnetic field component and in which primarily the electrons oscillate.

The Jaynes–Cummings model is a theoretical model in quantum optics. It describes the system of a two-level atom interacting with a quantized mode of an optical cavity, with or without the presence of light. It was originally developed to study the interaction of atoms with the quantized electromagnetic field in order to investigate the phenomena of spontaneous emission and absorption of photons in a cavity.

Inertial waves, also known as inertial oscillations, are a type of mechanical wave possible in rotating fluids. Unlike surface gravity waves commonly seen at the beach or in the bathtub, inertial waves flow through the interior of the fluid, not at the surface. Like any other kind of wave, an inertial wave is caused by a restoring force and characterized by its wavelength and frequency. Because the restoring force for inertial waves is the Coriolis force, their wavelengths and frequencies are related in a peculiar way. Inertial waves are transverse. Most commonly they are observed in atmospheres, oceans, lakes, and laboratory experiments. Rossby waves, geostrophic currents, and geostrophic winds are examples of inertial waves. Inertial waves are also likely to exist in the molten core of the rotating Earth.

Resonance fluorescence is the process in which a two-level atom system interacts with the quantum electromagnetic field if the field is driven at a frequency near to the natural frequency of the atom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Self-focusing</span>

Self-focusing is a non-linear optical process induced by the change in refractive index of materials exposed to intense electromagnetic radiation. A medium whose refractive index increases with the electric field intensity acts as a focusing lens for an electromagnetic wave characterized by an initial transverse intensity gradient, as in a laser beam. The peak intensity of the self-focused region keeps increasing as the wave travels through the medium, until defocusing effects or medium damage interrupt this process. Self-focusing of light was discovered by Gurgen Askaryan.

The Weibel instability is a plasma instability present in homogeneous or nearly homogeneous electromagnetic plasmas which possess an anisotropy in momentum (velocity) space. This anisotropy is most generally understood as two temperatures in different directions. Burton Fried showed that this instability can be understood more simply as the superposition of many counter-streaming beams. In this sense, it is like the two-stream instability except that the perturbations are electromagnetic and result in filamentation as opposed to electrostatic perturbations which would result in charge bunching. In the linear limit the instability causes exponential growth of electromagnetic fields in the plasma which help restore momentum space isotropy. In very extreme cases, the Weibel instability is related to one- or two-dimensional stream instabilities.

In physics, nonlinear resonance is the occurrence of resonance in a nonlinear system. In nonlinear resonance the system behaviour – resonance frequencies and modes – depends on the amplitude of the oscillations, while for linear systems this is independent of amplitude. The mixing of modes in non-linear systems is termed resonant interaction.

In mathematics and electronics, cavity perturbation theory describes methods for derivation of perturbation formulae for performance changes of a cavity resonator.

The interaction of matter with light, i.e., electromagnetic fields, is able to generate a coherent superposition of excited quantum states in the material. Coherent denotes the fact that the material excitations have a well defined phase relation which originates from the phase of the incident electromagnetic wave. Macroscopically, the superposition state of the material results in an optical polarization, i.e., a rapidly oscillating dipole density. The optical polarization is a genuine non-equilibrium quantity that decays to zero when the excited system relaxes to its equilibrium state after the electromagnetic pulse is switched off. Due to this decay which is called dephasing, coherent effects are observable only for a certain temporal duration after pulsed photoexcitation. Various materials such as atoms, molecules, metals, insulators, semiconductors are studied using coherent optical spectroscopy and such experiments and their theoretical analysis has revealed a wealth of insights on the involved matter states and their dynamical evolution.

In quantum optics, a superradiant phase transition is a phase transition that occurs in a collection of fluorescent emitters, between a state containing few electromagnetic excitations and a superradiant state with many electromagnetic excitations trapped inside the emitters. The superradiant state is made thermodynamically favorable by having strong, coherent interactions between the emitters.

Hopfield dielectric – in quantum mechanics, a model of dielectric consisting of quantum harmonic oscillators interacting with the modes of the quantum electromagnetic field. The collective interaction of the charge polarization modes with the vacuum excitations, photons leads to the perturbation of both the linear dispersion relation of photons and constant dispersion of charge waves by the avoided crossing between the two dispersion lines of polaritons. Similar to the acoustic and the optical phonons and far from the resonance one branch is photon-like while the other charge is wave-like. Mathematically the Hopfield dielectric for the one mode of excitation is equivalent to the Trojan wave packet in the harmonic approximation. The Hopfield model of the dielectric predicts the existence of eternal trapped frozen photons similar to the Hawking radiation inside the matter with the density proportional to the strength of the matter-field coupling.

The Farley–Buneman instability, or FB instability, is a microscopic plasma instability named after Donald T. Farley and Oscar Buneman. It is similar to the ionospheric Rayleigh-Taylor instability.

In the physics of continuous media, spatial dispersion is usually described as a phenomenon where material parameters such as permittivity or conductivity have dependence on wavevector. Normally, such a dependence is assumed to be absent for simplicity, however spatial dispersion exists to varying degrees in all materials.

The numerical models of lasers and the most of nonlinear optical systems stem from Maxwell–Bloch equations (MBE). This full set of Partial Differential Equations includes Maxwell equations for electromagnetic field and semiclassical equations of the two-level atoms. For this reason the simplified theoretical approaches were developed for numerical simulation of laser beams formation and their propagation since the early years of laser era. The Slowly varying envelope approximation of MBE follows from the standard nonlinear wave equation with nonlinear polarization $as a source:$

In nonlinear systems, the three-wave equations, sometimes called the three-wave resonant interaction equations or triad resonances, describe small-amplitude waves in a variety of non-linear media, including electrical circuits and non-linear optics. They are a set of completely integrable nonlinear partial differential equations. Because they provide the simplest, most direct example of a resonant interaction, have broad applicability in the sciences, and are completely integrable, they have been intensively studied since the 1970s.

References

↑ McComas, C. Henry; Bretherton, Francis P. (1977). "Resonant interaction of oceanic internal waves". Journal of Geophysical Research. 82 (9): 1397–1412. Bibcode:1977JGR....82.1397M. doi:10.1029/JC082i009p01397.
1 2 3 Janssen, P. A. E. M. (2009). "On some consequences of the canonical transformation in the hamiltonian theory of water waves". J. Fluid Mech. 637: 1–44. Bibcode:2009JFM...637....1J. doi:10.1017/S0022112009008131.
1 2 Onorato, Miguel; Vozella, Lara; Proment, Davide; Lvov, Yuri V. (2015). "A route to thermalization in the α-Fermi–Pasta–Ulam system". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 (14): 4208–4213. arXiv: 1402.1603 . Bibcode:2015PNAS..112.4208O. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404397112 . PMC 4394280 . PMID 25805822.
1 2 Zakharov, V. (1968). "Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on a surface of a deep fluid". J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 9 (2): 190–194. Bibcode:1968JAMTP...9..190Z. doi:10.1007/BF00913182. S2CID 55755251.
↑ "Small denominators", Encyclopedia of Mathematics , EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
↑ Bonnefoy, F.; Haudin, F.; Michel, G.; Semin, B.; Humbert, T.; Aumaître, S.; Berhanu, M.; Falcon, E. (2018). "Observation of resonant interactions among surface gravity waves". J. Fluid Mech. 805: R3. arXiv: 1606.09009 . doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.576. S2CID 1694066.
↑ Yang, Bo; Yang, Jianke (2020). "General rogue waves in the three-wave resonant interaction systems". arXiv: 2005.10847 [nlin.SI].
↑ Longuet-Higgins, Michael Selwyn; Gill, Adrian Edmund (1967). "Resonant interactions between planetary waves". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 299 (1456): 120–144. Bibcode:1967RSPSA.299..120L. doi:10.1098/rspa.1967.0126. S2CID 120179723.
↑ Kishimoto, Nobu; Yoneda, Tsuyoshi (2017). "A number theoretical observation of a resonant interaction of Rossby waves". Kodai Mathematical Journal. 40 (1): 16–20. arXiv: 1409.1031 . doi:10.2996/kmj/1490083220. S2CID 118262278.
↑ Kartashova, Elena (2010), Nonlinear Resonance Analysis. Theory, Computation, Applications, Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/nonlinear-resonance-analysis/76D57DB3D4FDB65B9505E926FE88B99E
↑ Zhou, Ji-xun; Zhang, Xue-zhen (1991). "Resonant interaction of sound wave with internal solitons in the coastal zone". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 90 (4): 2042–2054. Bibcode:1991ASAJ...90.2042Z. doi:10.1121/1.401632.
↑ Kato, Shoji (2004). "Wave–Warp Resonant Interactions in Relativistic Disks and kHz QPOs". Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. 56 (3): 599–607. Bibcode:2004PASJ...56..559K. doi: 10.1093/pasj/56.3.599 .
↑ Bogatskaya, A. V.; Klenov, N. V.; Tereshonok, M. V.; Adjemov, S. S.; Popov, A. M. (2018). "Resonant interaction of electromagnetic wave with plasma layer and overcoming the radiocommunication blackout problem". Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 51 (18): 185602. Bibcode:2018JPhD...51r5602B. doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aab756.
↑ Gover, Avraham; Yariv, Amnon (2020). "Free-Electron–Bound-Electron Resonant Interaction". Physical Review Letters. 124 (6): 064801. Bibcode:2020PhRvL.124f4801G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.064801. PMID 32109105.
↑ Vasiliev, A. A.; Artemyev, A. V.; Neishtadt, A. I.; Vainchtein, D. L.; Zelenyi, L. M. (2012). "Resonant Interaction of Charged Particles with Electromagnetic Waves". Chaos, Complexity and Transport. pp. 16–23. doi:10.1142/9789814405645_0002.
↑ Asenjo, Felipe A.; Mahajan, Swadesh M. (2020). "Resonant interaction between dispersive gravitational waves and scalar massive particles". Phys. Rev. D. 101 (6): 063010. Bibcode:2020PhRvD.101f3010A. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063010 .
↑ Veljkovic, Veljko (1985). "Is it possible to analyze DNA and protein sequences by the methods of digital signal processing?". IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 32 (5): 337–41. doi:10.1109/TBME.1985.325549. PMID 2581884. S2CID 23892544.
↑ Cosic, Irena (1997). The Resonant Recognition Model of Macromolecular Bioactivity. Berlin: Birkhäuser. ISBN 3-7643-5487-9.
↑ Calabrò, Emanuele; Magazù, Salvatore (2018). "Resonant interaction between electromagnetic fields and proteins: A possible starting point for the treatment of cancer". Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. 37 (2): 1–14. doi:10.1080/15368378.2018.1499031. PMID 30019948. S2CID 51678917.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] McComas, C. Henry; Bretherton, Francis P. (1977). "Resonant interaction of oceanic internal waves". Journal of Geophysical Research. 82 (9): 1397–1412. Bibcode:1977JGR....82.1397M. doi:10.1029/JC082i009p01397.

[janssen-2] 1 2 3 Janssen, P. A. E. M. (2009). "On some consequences of the canonical transformation in the hamiltonian theory of water waves". J. Fluid Mech. 637: 1–44. Bibcode:2009JFM...637....1J. doi:10.1017/S0022112009008131.

[fput-3] 1 2 Onorato, Miguel; Vozella, Lara; Proment, Davide; Lvov, Yuri V. (2015). "A route to thermalization in the α-Fermi–Pasta–Ulam system". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 (14): 4208–4213. arXiv: 1402.1603 . Bibcode:2015PNAS..112.4208O. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404397112 . PMC 4394280 . PMID 25805822.

[zakharov-4] 1 2 Zakharov, V. (1968). "Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on a surface of a deep fluid". J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 9 (2): 190–194. Bibcode:1968JAMTP...9..190Z. doi:10.1007/BF00913182. S2CID 55755251.

[5] "Small denominators", Encyclopedia of Mathematics , EMS Press, 2001 [1994]

[6] Bonnefoy, F.; Haudin, F.; Michel, G.; Semin, B.; Humbert, T.; Aumaître, S.; Berhanu, M.; Falcon, E. (2018). "Observation of resonant interactions among surface gravity waves". J. Fluid Mech. 805: R3. arXiv: 1606.09009 . doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.576. S2CID 1694066.

[7] Yang, Bo; Yang, Jianke (2020). "General rogue waves in the three-wave resonant interaction systems". arXiv: 2005.10847 [nlin.SI].

[8] Longuet-Higgins, Michael Selwyn; Gill, Adrian Edmund (1967). "Resonant interactions between planetary waves". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 299 (1456): 120–144. Bibcode:1967RSPSA.299..120L. doi:10.1098/rspa.1967.0126. S2CID 120179723.

[9] Kishimoto, Nobu; Yoneda, Tsuyoshi (2017). "A number theoretical observation of a resonant interaction of Rossby waves". Kodai Mathematical Journal. 40 (1): 16–20. arXiv: 1409.1031 . doi:10.2996/kmj/1490083220. S2CID 118262278.

[Kartashova2010-10] Kartashova, Elena (2010), Nonlinear Resonance Analysis. Theory, Computation, Applications, Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/nonlinear-resonance-analysis/76D57DB3D4FDB65B9505E926FE88B99E

[11] Zhou, Ji-xun; Zhang, Xue-zhen (1991). "Resonant interaction of sound wave with internal solitons in the coastal zone". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 90 (4): 2042–2054. Bibcode:1991ASAJ...90.2042Z. doi:10.1121/1.401632.

[12] Kato, Shoji (2004). "Wave–Warp Resonant Interactions in Relativistic Disks and kHz QPOs". Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. 56 (3): 599–607. Bibcode:2004PASJ...56..559K. doi: 10.1093/pasj/56.3.599 .

[13] Bogatskaya, A. V.; Klenov, N. V.; Tereshonok, M. V.; Adjemov, S. S.; Popov, A. M. (2018). "Resonant interaction of electromagnetic wave with plasma layer and overcoming the radiocommunication blackout problem". Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 51 (18): 185602. Bibcode:2018JPhD...51r5602B. doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aab756.

[14] Gover, Avraham; Yariv, Amnon (2020). "Free-Electron–Bound-Electron Resonant Interaction". Physical Review Letters. 124 (6): 064801. Bibcode:2020PhRvL.124f4801G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.064801. PMID 32109105.

[15] Vasiliev, A. A.; Artemyev, A. V.; Neishtadt, A. I.; Vainchtein, D. L.; Zelenyi, L. M. (2012). "Resonant Interaction of Charged Particles with Electromagnetic Waves". Chaos, Complexity and Transport. pp. 16–23. doi:10.1142/9789814405645_0002.

[16] Asenjo, Felipe A.; Mahajan, Swadesh M. (2020). "Resonant interaction between dispersive gravitational waves and scalar massive particles". Phys. Rev. D. 101 (6): 063010. Bibcode:2020PhRvD.101f3010A. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.063010 .

[17] Veljkovic, Veljko (1985). "Is it possible to analyze DNA and protein sequences by the methods of digital signal processing?". IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 32 (5): 337–41. doi:10.1109/TBME.1985.325549. PMID 2581884. S2CID 23892544.

[18] Cosic, Irena (1997). The Resonant Recognition Model of Macromolecular Bioactivity. Berlin: Birkhäuser. ISBN 3-7643-5487-9.

[19] Calabrò, Emanuele; Magazù, Salvatore (2018). "Resonant interaction between electromagnetic fields and proteins: A possible starting point for the treatment of cancer". Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. 37 (2): 1–14. doi:10.1080/15368378.2018.1499031. PMID 30019948. S2CID 51678917.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]