Resting state fMRI

Last updated
Resting state fMRI
Movie of the in vivo BOLD signal from the cortical surface of a human subject from HCP, acquired using resting state fMRI, pre-processed to suppress the noise in data [1] [2] and played back at a real-time rate. The BOLD signal intensities are visualized on a smoothed cortical surface. At each point on the cortex, white color represents the average BOLD signal, while blue and red colors represents lower and higher signal than average BOLD signal respectively. [2]
PurposeEvaluate regional interactions that occur in resting state(brain mapping)

Resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI or R-fMRI) is a method of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) that is used in brain mapping to evaluate regional interactions that occur in a resting or task-negative state, when an explicit task is not being performed. [3] [4] A number of resting-state brain networks have been identified, one of which is the default mode network. [5] These brain networks are observed through changes in blood flow in the brain which creates what is referred to as a blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal that can be measured using fMRI.

Contents

Because brain activity is intrinsic, present even in the absence of an externally prompted task, any brain region will have spontaneous fluctuations in BOLD signal. The resting state approach is useful to explore the brain's functional organization and to examine if it is altered in neurological or mental disorders. Because of the resting state aspect of this imaging, data can be collected from a range of patient groups including people with intellectual disabilities, pediatric groups, and even those that are unconscious. [6] [7] Resting-state functional connectivity research has revealed a number of networks which are consistently found in healthy subjects, different stages of consciousness and across species, and represent specific patterns of synchronous activity. [8] [9] [10]

Basics of resting state fMRI

These fMRI images are from a study showing parts of the brain lighting up on seeing houses and other parts on seeing faces. The 'r' values are correlations, with higher positive or negative values indicating a better match. Haxby2001.jpg
These fMRI images are from a study showing parts of the brain lighting up on seeing houses and other parts on seeing faces. The 'r' values are correlations, with higher positive or negative values indicating a better match.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (functional MRI or fMRI) is a specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedure that measures brain activity by detecting associated changes in blood flow. More specifically, brain activity is measured through low frequency BOLD signal in the brain. [11]

The procedure is similar to MRI but uses the change in magnetization between oxygen-rich and oxygen-poor blood as its basic measure. This measure is frequently corrupted by noise from various sources and hence statistical procedures are used to extract the underlying signal. The resulting brain activation can be presented graphically by color-coding the strength of activation across the brain or the specific region studied. The technique can localize activity to within millimeters but, using standard techniques, no better than within a window of a few seconds. [12]

FMRI is used both in research, and to a lesser extent, in clinical settings. It can also be combined and complemented with other measures of brain physiology such as EEG, NIRS, and functional ultrasound. [13] [14] Arterial spin labeling fMRI can be used as a complementary approach for assessing resting brain functions. [15] [16]

Physiological basis

The physiological blood-flow response largely decides the temporal sensitivity, how well neurons that are active can be measured in BOLD fMRI. The basic time resolution parameter is the sampling rate, or TR, which dictates how often a particular brain slice is excited and allowed to lose its magnetization. TRs could vary from the very short (500 ms) to the very long (3 seconds). For fMRI specifically, the haemodynamic response is assumed to last over 10 seconds, rising multiplicatively (that is, as a proportion of current value), peaking at 4 to 6 seconds, and then falling multiplicatively. Changes in the blood-flow system, the vascular system, integrate responses to neuronal activity over time. Because this response is a smooth continuous function, sampling with faster TRs helps only to map faster fluctuations like respiratory and heart rate signals. [17]

While fMRI strives to measure the neuronal activity in the brain, the BOLD signal can be influenced by many other physiological factors other than neuronal activity. For example, respiratory fluctuations and cardiovascular cycles affect the BOLD signal being measured in the brain and therefore are usually tried to be removed during processing of the raw fMRI data. Due to these sources of noise, there have been many experts who have approached the idea of resting state fMRI very skeptically during the early uses of fMRI. It has only been very recently that researchers have become confident that the signal being measured is not an artifact caused by other physiological function. [18]

Resting state functional connectivity between spatially distinct brain regions reflects the repeated history of co-activation patterns within these regions, thereby serving as a measure of plasticity. [19]

History

Bharat Biswal

In 1992, Bharat Biswal started his work as a graduate student at The Medical College of Wisconsin under the direction of his advisor, James S. Hyde, and discovered that the brain, even during rest, contains information about its functional organization. He had used fMRI to study how different regions of the brain communicate while the brain is at rest and not performing any active task. Though at the time, Biswal's research was mostly disregarded and attributed to another signal source, his resting neuroimaging technique has now been widely replicated and considered a valid method of mapping functional brain networks. Mapping the brain's activity while it is at rest holds many potentials for brain research and even helps doctors diagnose various diseases of the brain. [3]

Marcus Raichle

Experiments by neurologist Marcus Raichle's lab at Washington University School of Medicine and other groups showed that the brain's energy consumption is increased by less than 5% of its baseline energy consumption while performing a focused mental task. These experiments showed that the brain is constantly active with a high level of activity even when the person is not engaged in focused mental work (the resting state). His lab has been primarily focused on finding the basis of this resting activity and is credited with many groundbreaking discoveries. These include the relative independence of blood flow and oxygen consumption during changes in brain activity, which provided the physiological basis of fMRI, as well the discovery of the well known Default Mode Network. [20]

Connectivity

Functional

Functional connectivity is the connectivity between brain regions that share functional properties. More specifically, it can be defined as the temporal correlation between spatially remote neurophysiological events, expressed as deviation from statistical independence across these events in distributed neuronal groups and areas. [21] This applies to both resting state and task-state studies. While functional connectivity can refer to correlations across subjects, runs, blocks, trials, or individual time points, resting state functional connectivity focuses on connectivity assessed across individual BOLD time points during resting conditions. [22] Functional connectivity has also been evaluated using the perfusion time series sampled with arterial spin labeled perfusion fMRI. [23] Functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI), which can include resting state fMRI and task-based MRI, might someday help provide more definitive diagnoses for mental health disorders such as bipolar disorder and may also aid in understanding the development and progression of post-traumatic stress disorder as well as evaluate the effect of treatment. [24] Functional connectivity has been suggested to be an expression of the network behavior underlying high level cognitive function partially because unlike structural connectivity, functional connectivity often changes on the order of seconds as in the case of dynamic functional connectivity.[ citation needed ]

Networks

Study showing four functional networks that were found to be highly consistent across subjects. These modules include the visual (yellow), sensory/motor (orange) and basal ganglia (red) cortices as well as the default mode network (posterior cingulate, inferior parietal lobes, and medial frontal gyrus; maroon). RestingStateModels.jpg
Study showing four functional networks that were found to be highly consistent across subjects. These modules include the visual (yellow), sensory/motor (orange) and basal ganglia (red) cortices as well as the default mode network (posterior cingulate, inferior parietal lobes, and medial frontal gyrus; maroon).

Default mode network

The default mode network (DMN) is a network of brain regions that are active when an individual is awake and at rest. [25] The default mode network is an interconnected and anatomically defined brain system that preferentially activates when individuals focus on internal tasks such as daydreaming, envisioning the future, retrieving memories, and gauging others' perspectives. [26] It is negatively correlated with brain systems that focus on external visual signals. It is one of the most studied networks present during resting state and is one of the most easily visualized networks. [27]

Other resting state networks

Depending on the method of resting state analysis, functional connectivity studies have reported a number of neural networks that result to be strongly functionally connected during rest. The key networks, also referred as components, which are more frequently reported include: the DMN, the sensory/motor networks, the central executive network (CEN), up to three different visual networks, a ventral and dorsal attention network, the auditory network and the limbic network. [28] As already reported, these resting-state networks consist of anatomically separated, but functionally connected regions displaying a high level of correlated BOLD signal activity. These networks are found to be quite consistent across studies, despite differences in the data acquisition and analysis techniques. [28] [29] Importantly, most of these resting-state components represent known functional networks, that is, regions that are known to share and support cognitive functions. [9]

Analyzing data

Processing data

Many programs exist for the processing and analyzing of resting state fMRI data. Some of the most commonly used programs include SPM, AFNI, FSL (esp. Melodic for ICA), CONN, C-PAC, and Connectome Computation System (CCS).

Methods of analysis

There are many methods of both acquiring and processing rsfMRI data. The most popular methods of analysis focus either on independent components or on regions of correlation.[ citation needed ]

Independent component analysis

Independent component analysis (ICA) is a useful statistical approach in the detection of resting state networks. ICA separates a signal into non-overlapping spatial and time components. It is highly data-driven and allows for better removal of noisy components of the signal (motion, scanner drift, etc.). It also has been shown to reliably extract default mode network as well as many other networks with very high consistency. [30] [31] ICA remains in the forefront of the research methods. [32]

Regional analysis

Other methods of observing networks and connectivity in the brain include the seed-based d mapping and region of interest (ROI) methods of analysis. In these cases, signal from only a certain voxel or cluster of voxels known as the seed or ROI are used to calculate correlations with other voxels of the brain. This provides a much more precise and detailed look at specific connectivity in brain areas of interest. [33] [34] [35] This can also be performed across the entire brain by utilizing an atlas, making it easier to define ROI's and measure connectivity. In 2021, Yeung and colleagues conducted a regional analysis utilizing a modified version of the Human Connectome Project (HCP) atlas, and found changes in the functional connectome of stroke patients during rehabilitative treatment. [36] Overall connectivity between an ROI (such as the prefrontal cortex) and all other voxels of the brain can also be averaged, providing a measure of global brain connectivity (GBC) specific to that ROI. [37] Other methods for characterizing resting-state networks include partial correlation, coherence and partial coherence, phase relationships, dynamic time warping distance, clustering, and graph theory. [38] [39] [40]

Reliability and reproducibility

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rfMRI) can image low-frequency fluctuations in the spontaneous brain activities, representing a popular tool for macro-scale functional connectomics to characterize inter-individual differences in normal brain function, mind-brain associations, and the various disorders. This suggests reliability and reproducibility for commonly used rfMRI-derived measures of the human brain functional connectomics. These metrics hold great potentials of accelerating biomarker identification for various brain diseases, which call the need of addressing reliability and reproducibility at first place. [41]

Combining imaging techniques

This image is from a study using both fMRI and EEG acquisition at the resting state. The left row shows sagittal, coronal and horizontal slices of the ten RSNs. On the right side the covariance and t-maps for the 8 frequency bands are displayed. Resting State Networks and their topographic EEG signatures.jpg
This image is from a study using both fMRI and EEG acquisition at the resting state. The left row shows sagittal, coronal and horizontal slices of the ten RSNs. On the right side the covariance and t-maps for the 8 frequency bands are displayed.

fMRI with DWI

With fMRI providing functional and DWI structural information about the brain, these two imaging techniques are commonly used in conjunction to provide a holistic view of brain network interactions. When collected from defined ROI's, fMRI data informs researchers of how activity (blood flow) in the brain changes over time or during a task. [42] This is then bolstered through structural DWI data, which shows how individual white matter tracts connect these ROI's. [43] Investigations harnessing these techniques have progressed the field of network neuroscience, by further defining groups of regions in the brain which connect both structurally (having white matter tracts pass between them), and functionally (showing similar or opposite patterns of activity over time), into brain networks like the DMN. [44]

This combined data provides unique clinical and neuropsychiatric benefit, by enabling the investigation of how brain networks are disturbed, or white matter pathways compromised, by the presence of mental illness or structural damage. [45] Altered brain network connectivity has been shown across a swathe of disorders, such as Schizophrenia, [46] [47] Depression, [48] [49] Stroke, [49] [50] and brain tumor, [51] underpinning their unique symptoms.

fMRI with EEG

Many imaging experts [ who? ] feel that in order to obtain the best combination of spatial and temporal information from brain activity, both fMRI as well as electroencephalography (EEG) should be used simultaneously. This dual technique combines the EEG's well documented ability to characterize certain brain states with high temporal resolution and to reveal pathological patterns, with fMRI's (more recently discovered and less well understood) ability to image blood dynamics through the entire brain with high spatial resolution. Up to now, EEG-fMRI has been mainly seen as an fMRI technique in which the synchronously acquired EEG is used to characterize brain activity ('brain state') across time allowing to map (through statistical parametric mapping, for example) the associated haemodynamic changes. [52]

The clinical value of these findings is the subject of ongoing investigations, but recent researches suggest an acceptable reliability for EEG-fMRI studies and better sensitivity in higher field scanner. Outside the field of epilepsy, EEG-fMRI has been used to study event-related (triggered by external stimuli) brain responses and provided important new insights into baseline brain activity during resting wakefulness and sleep. [53]

fMRI with TMS

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) uses small and relatively precise magnetic fields to stimulate regions of the cortex without dangerous invasive procedures. When these magnetic fields stimulate an area of the cortex, focal blood flow increases at the site of stimulation as well as at distant sites anatomically connected to the stimulated location. Positron emission tomography (PET) can then be used to image the brain and changes in blood flow and results show very similar regions of connectivity confirming networks found in fMRI studies and TMS can also be used to support and provide more detailed information on the connected regions. [54]

Potential pitfalls

Potential pitfalls when using rsfMRI to determine functional network integrity are contamination of the BOLD signal by sources of physiological noise such as heart rate, respiration, [55] [56] and head motion. [57] [58] [59] [60] These confounding factors can often bias results in studies where patients are compared to healthy controls in the direction of hypothesized effects, for example a lower coherence might be found in the default network in the patient group, while the patient groups also moved more during the scan. Also, it has been shown that the use of global signal regression can produce artificial correlations between a small number of signals (e.g., two or three). [61] Fortunately, the brain has many signals. [62]

Current and future applications

Research using resting state fMRI has the potential to be applied in clinical context, including use in the assessment of many different diseases and mental disorders. [63]

Disease condition and changes in resting state functional connectivity

Other types of current and future clinical applications for resting state fMRI include identifying group differences in brain disease, obtaining diagnostic and prognostic information, longitudinal studies and treatment effects, clustering in heterogeneous disease states, and pre-operative mapping and targeting intervention. [84] Due to its lack of reliance on task performance and cognitive demands, resting state fMRI can be a useful tool in assessing brain alterations in disorders of impaired consciousness and cognition, as well as paediatric populations. [85]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brodmann area 9</span> Part of the frontal cortex in the brain of humans and other primates

Brodmann area 9, or BA9, refers to a cytoarchitecturally defined portion of the frontal cortex in the brain of humans and other primates. Its cytoarchitecture is referred to as granular due to the concentration of granule cells in layer IV. It contributes to the dorsolateral and medial prefrontal cortex.

Functional integration is the study of how brain regions work together to process information and effect responses. Though functional integration frequently relies on anatomic knowledge of the connections between brain areas, the emphasis is on how large clusters of neurons – numbering in the thousands or millions – fire together under various stimuli. The large datasets required for such a whole-scale picture of brain function have motivated the development of several novel and general methods for the statistical analysis of interdependence, such as dynamic causal modelling and statistical linear parametric mapping. These datasets are typically gathered in human subjects by non-invasive methods such as EEG/MEG, fMRI, or PET. The results can be of clinical value by helping to identify the regions responsible for psychiatric disorders, as well as to assess how different activities or lifestyles affect the functioning of the brain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orbitofrontal cortex</span> Region of the prefrontal cortex of the brain

The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is a prefrontal cortex region in the frontal lobes of the brain which is involved in the cognitive process of decision-making. In non-human primates it consists of the association cortex areas Brodmann area 11, 12 and 13; in humans it consists of Brodmann area 10, 11 and 47.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Posterior cingulate cortex</span> Caudal part of the cingulate cortex of the brain

The posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) is the caudal part of the cingulate cortex, located posterior to the anterior cingulate cortex. This is the upper part of the "limbic lobe". The cingulate cortex is made up of an area around the midline of the brain. Surrounding areas include the retrosplenial cortex and the precuneus.

Connectomics is the production and study of connectomes: comprehensive maps of connections within an organism's nervous system. More generally, it can be thought of as the study of neuronal wiring diagrams with a focus on how structural connectivity, individual synapses, cellular morphology, and cellular ultrastructure contribute to the make up of a network. The nervous system is a network made of billions of connections and these connections are responsible for our thoughts, emotions, actions, memories, function and dysfunction. Therefore, the study of connectomics aims to advance our understanding of mental health and cognition by understanding how cells in the nervous system are connected and communicate. Because these structures are extremely complex, methods within this field use a high-throughput application of functional and structural neural imaging, most commonly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electron microscopy, and histological techniques in order to increase the speed, efficiency, and resolution of these nervous system maps. To date, tens of large scale datasets have been collected spanning the nervous system including the various areas of cortex, cerebellum, the retina, the peripheral nervous system and neuromuscular junctions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Default mode network</span> Large-scale brain network active when not focusing on an external task

In neuroscience, the default mode network (DMN), also known as the default network, default state network, or anatomically the medial frontoparietal network (M-FPN), is a large-scale brain network primarily composed of the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus and angular gyrus. It is best known for being active when a person is not focused on the outside world and the brain is at wakeful rest, such as during daydreaming and mind-wandering. It can also be active during detailed thoughts related to external task performance. Other times that the DMN is active include when the individual is thinking about others, thinking about themselves, remembering the past, and planning for the future.

Psychophysiological interaction (PPI) is a brain connectivity analysis method for functional brain imaging data, mainly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). It estimates context-dependent changes in effective connectivity (coupling) between brain regions. Thus, PPI analysis identifies brain regions whose activity depends on an interaction between psychological context and physiological state of the seed region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marcus Raichle</span> American neurologist

Marcus E. Raichle is an American neurologist at the Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Missouri. He is a professor in the Department of Radiology with joint appointments in Neurology, Neurobiology and Biomedical Engineering. His research over the past 40 years has focused on the nature of functional brain imaging signals arising from PET and fMRI and the application of these techniques to the study of the human brain in health and disease. He received the Kavli Prize in Neuroscience “for the discovery of specialized brain networks for memory and cognition", together with Brenda Milner and John O’Keefe in 2014.

The biological basis of personality is a collection of brain systems and mechanisms that underlie human personality. Human neurobiology, especially as it relates to complex traits and behaviors, is not well understood, but research into the neuroanatomical and functional underpinnings of personality are an active field of research. Animal models of behavior, molecular biology, and brain imaging techniques have provided some insight into human personality, especially trait theories.

Dynamic functional connectivity (DFC) refers to the observed phenomenon that functional connectivity changes over a short time. Dynamic functional connectivity is a recent expansion on traditional functional connectivity analysis which typically assumes that functional networks are static in time. DFC is related to a variety of different neurological disorders, and has been suggested to be a more accurate representation of functional brain networks. The primary tool for analyzing DFC is fMRI, but DFC has also been observed with several other mediums. DFC is a recent development within the field of functional neuroimaging whose discovery was motivated by the observation of temporal variability in the rising field of steady state connectivity research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Large-scale brain network</span> Collections of brain regions

Large-scale brain networks are collections of widespread brain regions showing functional connectivity by statistical analysis of the fMRI BOLD signal or other recording methods such as EEG, PET and MEG. An emerging paradigm in neuroscience is that cognitive tasks are performed not by individual brain regions working in isolation but by networks consisting of several discrete brain regions that are said to be "functionally connected". Functional connectivity networks may be found using algorithms such as cluster analysis, spatial independent component analysis (ICA), seed based, and others. Synchronized brain regions may also be identified using long-range synchronization of the EEG, MEG, or other dynamic brain signals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Salience network</span> Large-scale brain network involved in detecting and attending to relevant stimuli

The salience network (SN), also known anatomically as the midcingulo-insular network (M-CIN) or ventral attention network, is a large scale network of the human brain that is primarily composed of the anterior insula (AI) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). It is involved in detecting and filtering salient stimuli, as well as in recruiting relevant functional networks. Together with its interconnected brain networks, the SN contributes to a variety of complex functions, including communication, social behavior, and self-awareness through the integration of sensory, emotional, and cognitive information.

Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) is a framework for specifying models, fitting them to data and comparing their evidence using Bayesian model comparison. It uses nonlinear state-space models in continuous time, specified using stochastic or ordinary differential equations. DCM was initially developed for testing hypotheses about neural dynamics. In this setting, differential equations describe the interaction of neural populations, which directly or indirectly give rise to functional neuroimaging data e.g., functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG). Parameters in these models quantify the directed influences or effective connectivity among neuronal populations, which are estimated from the data using Bayesian statistical methods.

Brain–body interactions are patterns of neural activity in the central nervous system to coordinate the activity between the brain and body. The nervous system consists of central and peripheral nervous systems and coordinates the actions of an animal by transmitting signals to and from different parts of its body. The brain and spinal cord are interwoven with the body and interact with other organ systems through the somatic, autonomic and enteric nervous systems. Neural pathways regulate brain–body interactions and allow to sense and control its body and interact with the environment.

Social cognitive neuroscience is the scientific study of the biological processes underpinning social cognition. Specifically, it uses the tools of neuroscience to study "the mental mechanisms that create, frame, regulate, and respond to our experience of the social world". Social cognitive neuroscience uses the epistemological foundations of cognitive neuroscience, and is closely related to social neuroscience. Social cognitive neuroscience employs human neuroimaging, typically using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Human brain stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct-current stimulation are also used. In nonhuman animals, direct electrophysiological recordings and electrical stimulation of single cells and neuronal populations are utilized for investigating lower-level social cognitive processes.

The OHBM Replication Award is an award presented annually by the Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM). It is presented to a researcher in recognition of conducting and disseminating the results of a neuroimaging replication study of exceptional quality and impact.

Network neuroscience is an approach to understanding the structure and function of the human brain through an approach of network science, through the paradigm of graph theory. A network is a connection of many brain regions that interact with each other to give rise to a particular function. Network Neuroscience is a broad field that studies the brain in an integrative way by recording, analyzing, and mapping the brain in various ways. The field studies the brain at multiple scales of analysis to ultimately explain brain systems, behavior, and dysfunction of behavior in psychiatric and neurological diseases. Network neuroscience provides an important theoretical base for understanding neurobiological systems at multiple scales of analysis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dimitri Van De Ville</span> Swiss-Belgian computer scientist and neuroscientist specialized in brain activity networks

Dimitri Van De Ville is a Swiss and Belgian computer scientist and neuroscientist specialized in dynamical and network aspects of brain activity. He is a professor of bioengineering at EPFL and the head of the Medical Image Processing Laboratory at EPFL's School of Engineering.

Functional MRI imaging methods have allowed researchers to combine neurocognitive testing with structural neuroanatomical measures, take into consideration both cognitive and affective paradigms, and subsequently create computer-aided diagnosis techniques and algorithms. Functional MRI has several benefits, such as its non-invasive quality, relatively high spatial resolution, and decent temporal resolution. One particular method used in recent research is resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging, rs-fMRI. fMRI imaging has been applied to numerous behavioral studies for schizophrenia, the findings of which have hinted toward potential brain regions that govern key characteristics in cognition and affect.

Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli is an American scientist, psychologist/neuroscientist, academic and researcher. She is a professor of psychology, the Founding Director of the Biomedical Imaging Center at Northeastern University, Researcher in the Department of Psychiatry at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School and a Research Affiliate of McGovern Institute for Brain Research at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

References

  1. ↑ Smith SM, Beckmann CF, Andersson J, Auerbach EJ, Bijsterbosch J, Douaud G, et al. (October 2013). "Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project". NeuroImage. 80: 144–168. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.039. PMC   3720828 . PMID   23702415.
  2. 1 2 Bhushan C, Chong M, Choi S, Joshi AA, Haldar JP, Damasio H, Leahy RM (2016-07-08). "Temporal Non-Local Means Filtering Reveals Real-Time Whole-Brain Cortical Interactions in Resting fMRI". PLOS ONE. 11 (7): e0158504. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1158504B. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158504 . PMC   4938391 . PMID   27391481.
  3. 1 2 Biswal BB (August 2012). "Resting state fMRI: a personal history". NeuroImage. 62 (2): 938–944. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.090. PMID   22326802. S2CID   93823.
  4. ↑ Buckner RL, Krienen FM, Yeo BT (July 2013). "Opportunities and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI". Nature Neuroscience. 16 (7): 832–837. doi:10.1038/nn.3423. PMID   23799476. S2CID   17141252.
  5. ↑ Sharaev MG, Zavyalova VV, Ushakov VL, Kartashov SI, Velichkovsky BM (2016). "Effective Connectivity within the Default Mode Network: Dynamic Causal Modeling of Resting-State fMRI Data". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 10: 14. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00014 . PMC   4740785 . PMID   26869900.
  6. ↑ Agcaoglu O, Wilson TW, Wang YP, Stephen J, Calhoun VD (June 2019). "Resting state connectivity differences in eyes open versus eyes closed conditions". Human Brain Mapping. 40 (8): 2488–2498. doi:10.1002/hbm.24539. PMC   6865559 . PMID   30720907.
  7. ↑ Smitha KA, Akhil Raja K, Arun KM, Rajesh PG, Thomas B, Kapilamoorthy TR, Kesavadas C (August 2017). "Resting state fMRI: A review on methods in resting state connectivity analysis and resting state networks". The Neuroradiology Journal. 30 (4): 305–317. doi:10.1177/1971400917697342. PMC   5524274 . PMID   28353416.
  8. ↑ Biswal BB (2011). "Resting State Functional Connectivity". Biological Psychiatry. 69 (9): 200S. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.03.032. S2CID   142478873.
  9. 1 2 Rosazza C, Minati L (October 2011). "Resting-state brain networks: literature review and clinical applications". Neurological Sciences. 32 (5): 773–785. doi:10.1007/s10072-011-0636-y. PMID   21667095. S2CID   17222.
  10. ↑ Cole DM, Smith SM, Beckmann CF (2010). "Advances and pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting-state FMRI data". Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 4: 8. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00008 . PMC   2854531 . PMID   20407579.
  11. ↑ DeYoe EA, Bandettini P, Neitz J, Miller D, Winans P (October 1994). "Functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) of the human brain". Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 54 (2): 171–187. doi:10.1016/0165-0270(94)90191-0. PMID   7869750. S2CID   3718293.
  12. ↑ Bandettini PA (September 2009). "Seven topics in functional magnetic resonance imaging". Journal of Integrative Neuroscience. 8 (3): 371–403. doi:10.1142/s0219635209002186. PMC   3143579 . PMID   19938211.
  13. ↑ Bandettini P (February 2007). "Functional MRI today". International Journal of Psychophysiology. 63 (2): 138–145. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.016. PMID   16842871.
  14. ↑ Korhonen V, Hiltunen T, Myllylä T, Wang X, Kantola J, Nikkinen J, et al. (November 2014). "Synchronous multiscale neuroimaging environment for critically sampled physiological analysis of brain function: hepta-scan concept". Brain Connectivity. 4 (9): 677–689. doi:10.1089/brain.2014.0258. PMC   4238249 . PMID   25131996.
  15. ↑ Chuang KH, van Gelderen P, Merkle H, Bodurka J, Ikonomidou VN, Koretsky AP, et al. (May 2008). "Mapping resting-state functional connectivity using perfusion MRI". NeuroImage. 40 (4): 1595–1605. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.006. PMC   2435272 . PMID   18314354.
  16. ↑ Bertolo, Adrien (2023). "High sensitivity mapping of brain-wide functional networks in awake mice using simultaneous multi-slice fUS imaging". Imaging Neuroscience. 1: 1–18. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00030 .
  17. ↑ Huettel SA, Song AW, McCarthy G (2008). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (2nd ed.). Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates. ISBN   978-0-87893-286-3.
  18. ↑ Damoiseaux JS, Rombouts SA, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Stam CJ, Smith SM, Beckmann CF (September 2006). "Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (37): 13848–13853. Bibcode:2006PNAS..10313848D. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601417103 . PMC   1564249 . PMID   16945915.
  19. ↑ Guerra-Carrillo B, Mackey AP, Bunge SA (October 2014). "Resting-state fMRI: a window into human brain plasticity". The Neuroscientist. 20 (5): 522–533. doi:10.1177/1073858414524442. PMID   24561514. S2CID   13300284.
  20. ↑ Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME (July 2005). "The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 102 (27): 9673–9678. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.9673F. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102 . PMC   1157105 . PMID   15976020.
  21. ↑ Biswal BB, Van Kylen J, Hyde JS (1997). "Simultaneous assessment of flow and BOLD signals in resting-state functional connectivity maps". NMR in Biomedicine. 10 (4–5): 165–170. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1492(199706/08)10:4/5<165::aid-nbm454>3.0.co;2-7. PMID   9430343. S2CID   25428304.
  22. ↑ Friston K (February 2009). "Causal modelling and brain connectivity in functional magnetic resonance imaging". PLOS Biology. 7 (2): e33. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000033 . PMC   2642881 . PMID   19226186.
  23. ↑ Fernández-Seara MA, Aznárez-Sanado M, Mengual E, Irigoyen J, Heukamp F, Pastor MA (August 2011). "Effects on resting cerebral blood flow and functional connectivity induced by metoclopramide: a perfusion MRI study in healthy volunteers". British Journal of Pharmacology. 163 (8): 1639–1652. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01161.x. PMC   3166692 . PMID   21175574.
  24. ↑ Smith SM (August 2012). "The future of FMRI connectivity". NeuroImage. 62 (2): 1257–1266. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.022. PMID   22248579. S2CID   30701163.
  25. ↑ Raichle ME (July 2015). "The brain's default mode network". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 38 (1): 433–447. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014030 . PMID   25938726.
  26. ↑ Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V (January 2003). "Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (1): 253–258. Bibcode:2003PNAS..100..253G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0135058100 . PMC   140943 . PMID   12506194.
  27. ↑ Buckner RL (August 2012). "The serendipitous discovery of the brain's default network". NeuroImage. 62 (2): 1137–1145. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.035. PMID   22037421. S2CID   9880586.
  28. 1 2 Moussa MN, Steen MR, Laurienti PJ, Hayasaka S (2012). "Consistency of network modules in resting-state FMRI connectome data". PLOS ONE. 7 (8): e44428. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...744428M. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044428 . PMC   3432126 . PMID   22952978.
  29. ↑ Lee MH, Hacker CD, Snyder AZ, Corbetta M, Zhang D, Leuthardt EC, Shimony JS (2012). "Clustering of resting state networks". PLOS ONE. 7 (7): e40370. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...740370L. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040370 . PMC   3392237 . PMID   22792291.
  30. ↑ Kiviniemi V, Kantola JH, Jauhiainen J, Hyvärinen A, Tervonen O (June 2003). "Independent component analysis of nondeterministic fMRI signal sources". NeuroImage. 19 (2 Pt 1): 253–260. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00097-1. PMID   12814576. S2CID   17110486.
  31. ↑ Beckmann CF, DeLuca M, Devlin JT, Smith SM (May 2005). "Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 360 (1457): 1001–1013. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1634. PMC   1854918 . PMID   16087444.
  32. ↑ Calhoun VD, de Lacy N (November 2017). "Ten Key Observations on the Analysis of Resting-state Functional MR Imaging Data Using Independent Component Analysis". Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 27 (4): 561–579. doi:10.1016/j.nic.2017.06.012. PMC   5657522 . PMID   28985929.
  33. ↑ Doyen S, Nicholas P, Poologaindran A, Crawford L, Young IM, Romero-Garcia R, Sughrue ME (November 2021). "Connectivity-based parcellation of normal and anatomically distorted human cerebral cortex". Human Brain Mapping. 43 (4): 1358–1369. doi:10.1002/hbm.25728. PMC   8837585 . PMID   34826179. S2CID   244660926.
  34. ↑ Margulies DS, Kelly AM, Uddin LQ, Biswal BB, Castellanos FX, Milham MP (August 2007). "Mapping the functional connectivity of anterior cingulate cortex". NeuroImage. 37 (2): 579–588. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.019. PMID   17604651. S2CID   3330669.
  35. ↑ Van Dijk KR, Hedden T, Venkataraman A, Evans KC, Lazar SW, Buckner RL (January 2010). "Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization". Journal of Neurophysiology. 103 (1): 297–321. doi:10.1152/jn.00783.2009. PMC   2807224 . PMID   19889849.
  36. ↑ Yeung JT, Young IM, Doyen S, Teo C, Sughrue ME (October 2021). "Changes in the Brain Connectome Following Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation". Cureus. 13 (10): e19105. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19105 . PMC   8614179 . PMID   34858752.
  37. ↑ Cole MW, Yarkoni T, Repovs G, Anticevic A, Braver TS (June 2012). "Global connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts cognitive control and intelligence". The Journal of Neuroscience. 32 (26): 8988–8999. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0536-12.2012. PMC   3392686 . PMID   22745498.
  38. ↑ Chang C, Glover GH (March 2010). "Time-frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI". NeuroImage. 50 (1): 81–98. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.011. PMC   2827259 . PMID   20006716.
  39. ↑ Faria AV, Joel SE, Zhang Y, Oishi K, van Zjil PC, Miller MI, et al. (July 2012). "Atlas-based analysis of resting-state functional connectivity: evaluation for reproducibility and multi-modal anatomy-function correlation studies". NeuroImage. 61 (3): 613–621. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.078. PMC   3358461 . PMID   22498656.
  40. ↑ Meszlényi RJ, Hermann P, Buza K, Gál V, Vidnyánszky Z (2017-01-01). "Resting State fMRI Functional Connectivity Analysis Using Dynamic Time Warping". Frontiers in Neuroscience. 11: 75. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00075 . PMC   5313507 . PMID   28261052.
  41. ↑ Zuo XN, Xing XX (September 2014). "Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: a systems neuroscience perspective". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 45: 100–118. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.009. PMID   24875392. S2CID   20844969.
  42. ↑ Fox MD, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Corbetta M, Van Essen DC, Raichle ME (July 2005). "The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 102 (27): 9673–9678. Bibcode:2005PNAS..102.9673F. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102 . PMC   1157105 . PMID   15976020.
  43. ↑ Baliyan V, Das CJ, Sharma R, Gupta AK (September 2016). "Diffusion weighted imaging: Technique and applications". World Journal of Radiology. 8 (9): 785–798. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.785 . PMC   5039674 . PMID   27721941.
  44. ↑ Baker CM, Burks JD, Briggs RG, Conner AK, Glenn CA, Sali G, et al. (December 2018). "A Connectomic Atlas of the Human Cerebrum-Chapter 1: Introduction, Methods, and Significance". Operative Neurosurgery. 15 (suppl_1): S1–S9. doi:10.1093/ons/opy253. PMC   6887907 . PMID   30260422.
  45. ↑ Dadario NB, Brahimaj B, Yeung J, Sughrue ME (2021). "Reducing the Cognitive Footprint of Brain Tumor Surgery". Frontiers in Neurology. 12: 711646. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.711646 . PMC   8415405 . PMID   34484105.
  46. ↑ Konrad A, Winterer G (January 2008). "Disturbed structural connectivity in schizophrenia primary factor in pathology or epiphenomenon?". Schizophrenia Bulletin. 34 (1): 72–92. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm034. PMC   2632386 . PMID   17485733.
  47. ↑ Skudlarski P, Jagannathan K, Anderson K, Stevens MC, Calhoun VD, Skudlarska BA, Pearlson G (July 2010). "Brain connectivity is not only lower but different in schizophrenia: a combined anatomical and functional approach". Biological Psychiatry. Schizophrenia: N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor Dysfunction and Cortical Connectivity. 68 (1): 61–69. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.03.035. PMC   2900394 . PMID   20497901.
  48. ↑ Long Z, Duan X, Wang Y, Liu F, Zeng L, Zhao JP, Chen H (January 2015). "Disrupted structural connectivity network in treatment-naive depression". Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry. 56: 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2014.07.007. PMID   25092218. S2CID   31447630.
  49. 1 2 Wu F, Tu Z, Sun J, Geng H, Zhou Y, Jiang X, et al. (2020). "Abnormal Functional and Structural Connectivity of Amygdala-Prefrontal Circuit in First-Episode Adolescent Depression: A Combined fMRI and DTI Study". Frontiers in Psychiatry. 10: 983. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00983 . PMC   7013238 . PMID   32116814.
  50. ↑ Park CH, Chang WH, Ohn SH, Kim ST, Bang OY, Pascual-Leone A, Kim YH (May 2011). "Longitudinal changes of resting-state functional connectivity during motor recovery after stroke". Stroke. 42 (5): 1357–1362. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.596155. PMC   3589816 . PMID   21441147.
  51. ↑ Bartolomei F, Bosma I, Klein M, Baayen JC, Reijneveld JC, Postma TJ, et al. (September 2006). "Disturbed functional connectivity in brain tumour patients: evaluation by graph analysis of synchronization matrices". Clinical Neurophysiology. 117 (9): 2039–2049. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.05.018. PMID   16859985. S2CID   36779994.
  52. ↑ Majeed W, Magnuson M, Keilholz SD (August 2009). "Spatiotemporal dynamics of low frequency fluctuations in BOLD fMRI of the rat". Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 30 (2): 384–393. doi:10.1002/jmri.21848. PMC   2758521 . PMID   19629982.
  53. ↑ Keilholz SD, Magnuson M, Thompson G (August 2010). "Evaluation of data-driven network analysis approaches for functional connectivity MRI". Brain Structure & Function. 215 (2): 129–140. doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0276-7. PMID   20853181. S2CID   25783833.
  54. ↑ Fox MD, Halko MA, Eldaief MC, Pascual-Leone A (October 2012). "Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)". NeuroImage. 62 (4): 2232–2243. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.035. PMC   3518426 . PMID   22465297.
  55. ↑ Birn RM, Diamond JB, Smith MA, Bandettini PA (July 2006). "Separating respiratory-variation-related fluctuations from neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fMRI". NeuroImage. 31 (4): 1536–1548. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.048. PMID   16632379. S2CID   3892813.
  56. ↑ Chang C, Glover GH (October 2009). "Relationship between respiration, end-tidal CO2, and BOLD signals in resting-state fMRI". NeuroImage. 47 (4): 1381–93. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.048. PMC   2721281 . PMID   19393322.
  57. ↑ Ing A, Schwarzbauer C (November 2012). "A dual echo approach to motion correction for functional connectivity studies". NeuroImage. 63 (3): 1487–1497. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.042. PMID   22846657. S2CID   670206.
  58. ↑ Van Dijk KR, Sabuncu MR, Buckner RL (January 2012). "The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI". NeuroImage. 59 (1): 431–438. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.044. PMC   3683830 . PMID   21810475.
  59. ↑ Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE (February 2012). "Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion". NeuroImage. 59 (3): 2142–2154. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018. PMC   3254728 . PMID   22019881.
  60. ↑ Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Loughead J, Ruparel K, Elliott MA, Hakonarson H, et al. (March 2012). "Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth". NeuroImage. 60 (1): 623–632. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.063. PMC   3746318 . PMID   22233733.
  61. ↑ Saad ZS, Gotts SJ, Murphy K, Chen G, Jo HJ, Martin A, Cox RW (2012). "Trouble at rest: how correlation patterns and group differences become distorted after global signal regression". Brain Connectivity. 2 (1): 25–32. doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0080. PMC   3484684 . PMID   22432927.
  62. ↑ Cordes D, Nandy RR (January 2006). "Estimation of the intrinsic dimensionality of fMRI data". NeuroImage. 29 (1): 145–154. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.054. PMID   16202626. S2CID   9228087.
  63. ↑ Holtbernd F, Eidelberg D (August 2012). "Functional brain networks in movement disorders: recent advances". Current Opinion in Neurology. 25 (4): 392–401. doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e328355aa94. PMC   4554600 . PMID   22710361.
  64. 1 2 Li R, Wu X, Chen K, Fleisher AS, Reiman EM, Yao L (February 2013). "Alterations of directional connectivity among resting-state networks in Alzheimer disease". AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 34 (2): 340–5. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3197. PMC   4097966 . PMID   22790250.
  65. ↑ Liang P, Wang Z, Yang Y, Li K (2012). "Three subsystems of the inferior parietal cortex are differently affected in mild cognitive impairment". Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 30 (3): 475–487. doi:10.3233/JAD-2012-111721. PMID   22451310.
  66. ↑ Müller RA, Shih P, Keehn B, Deyoe JR, Leyden KM, Shukla DK (October 2011). "Underconnected, but how? A survey of functional connectivity MRI studies in autism spectrum disorders". Cerebral Cortex. 21 (10): 2233–2243. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq296. PMC   3169656 . PMID   21378114.
  67. ↑ Subbaraju V, Suresh MB, Sundaram S, Narasimhan S (January 2017). "Identifying differences in brain activities and an accurate detection of autism spectrum disorder using resting state functional-magnetic resonance imaging : A spatial filtering approach". Medical Image Analysis. 35: 375–389. doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.08.003. PMID   27585835. S2CID   4922560.
  68. ↑ Anand A, Li Y, Wang Y, Wu J, Gao S, Bukhari L, et al. (May 2005). "Activity and connectivity of brain mood regulating circuit in depression: a functional magnetic resonance study". Biological Psychiatry. 57 (10): 1079–1088. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.021. PMID   15866546. S2CID   19311022.
  69. ↑ Greicius MD, Flores BH, Menon V, Glover GH, Solvason HB, Kenna H, et al. (September 2007). "Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus". Biological Psychiatry. 62 (5): 429–437. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.020. PMC   2001244 . PMID   17210143.
  70. ↑ Anand A, Li Y, Wang Y, Wu J, Gao S, Bukhari L, et al. (July 2005). "Antidepressant effect on connectivity of the mood-regulating circuit: an FMRI study". Neuropsychopharmacology. 30 (7): 1334–1344. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300725 . PMID   15856081.
  71. ↑ Anand A, Li Y, Wang Y, Gardner K, Lowe MJ (2007-07-01). "Reciprocal effects of antidepressant treatment on activity and connectivity of the mood regulating circuit: an FMRI study". The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 19 (3): 274–282. doi:10.1176/jnp.2007.19.3.274. PMC   3465666 . PMID   17827412.
  72. ↑ Anand A, Li Y, Wang Y, Lowe MJ, Dzemidzic M (March 2009). "Resting state corticolimbic connectivity abnormalities in unmedicated bipolar disorder and unipolar depression". Psychiatry Research. 171 (3): 189–198. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.03.012. PMC   3001251 . PMID   19230623.
  73. ↑ Spielberg JM, Beall EB, Hulvershorn LA, Altinay M, Karne H, Anand A (December 2016). "Resting State Brain Network Disturbances Related to Hypomania and Depression in Medication-Free Bipolar Disorder". Neuropsychopharmacology. 41 (13): 3016–3024. doi:10.1038/npp.2016.112. PMC   5101549 . PMID   27356764.
  74. ↑ Altinay MI, Hulvershorn LA, Karne H, Beall EB, Anand A (April 2016). "Differential Resting-State Functional Connectivity of Striatal Subregions in Bipolar Depression and Hypomania". Brain Connectivity. 6 (3): 255–265. doi:10.1089/brain.2015.0396. PMC   4827275 . PMID   26824737.
  75. ↑ Altinay M, Karne H, Anand A (January 2018). "Lithium monotherapy associated clinical improvement effects on amygdala-ventromedial prefrontal cortex resting state connectivity in bipolar disorder". Journal of Affective Disorders. 225: 4–12. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.047. PMC   5844774 . PMID   28772145.
  76. ↑ Venkataraman A, Whitford TJ, Westin CF, Golland P, Kubicki M (August 2012). "Whole brain resting state functional connectivity abnormalities in schizophrenia". Schizophrenia Research. 139 (1–3): 7–12. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.04.021. hdl:1721.1/100215. PMC   3393792 . PMID   22633528.
  77. ↑ Uddin LQ, Kelly AM, Biswal BB, Margulies DS, Shehzad Z, Shaw D, et al. (March 2008). "Network homogeneity reveals decreased integrity of default-mode network in ADHD". Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 169 (1): 249–254. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.11.031. PMID   18190970. S2CID   35668659.
  78. ↑ Zang YF, Zhao SG (August 2012). "Resting-state fMRI studies in epilepsy". Neuroscience Bulletin. 28 (4): 449–455. doi:10.1007/s12264-012-1255-1. PMC   5561896 . PMID   22833042.
  79. ↑ Tessitore A, Amboni M, Esposito F, Russo A, Picillo M, Marcuccio L, et al. (July 2012). "Resting-state brain connectivity in patients with Parkinson's disease and freezing of gait". Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 18 (6): 781–787. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.03.018. PMID   22510204.
  80. ↑ Li P, Li S, Dong Z, Luo J, Han H, Xiong H, et al. (August 2012). "Altered resting state functional connectivity patterns of the anterior prefrontal cortex in obsessive-compulsive disorder". NeuroReport. 23 (11): 681–686. doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e328355a5fe. PMID   22692554. S2CID   41049732.
  81. ↑ Otti A, Guendel H, Wohlschläger A, Zimmer C, Noll-Hussong M (March 2013). "Frequency shifts in the anterior default mode network and the salience network in chronic pain disorder". BMC Psychiatry. 13: 84. doi: 10.1186/1471-244x-13-84 . PMC   3616999 . PMID   23497482.
  82. ↑ Otti A, Guendel H, Henningsen P, Zimmer C, Wohlschlaeger AM, Noll-Hussong M (January 2013). "Functional network connectivity of pain-related resting state networks in somatoform pain disorder: an exploratory fMRI study". Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience. 38 (1): 57–65. doi:10.1503/jpn.110187. PMC   3529220 . PMID   22894821.
  83. ↑ Gaudio S, Wiemerslage L, Brooks SJ, Schiöth HB (December 2016). "A systematic review of resting-state functional-MRI studies in anorexia nervosa: Evidence for functional connectivity impairment in cognitive control and visuospatial and body-signal integration". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 71: 578–589. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.032 . PMID   27725172.
  84. ↑ Fox MD, Greicius M (2010). "Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity". Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 4: 19. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00019 . PMC   2893721 . PMID   20592951.
  85. ↑ Lee, MH; Smyser, CD; Shimony, JS (October 2013). "Resting-state fMRI: a review of methods and clinical applications". AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 34 (10): 1866–72. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3263 . PMC   4035703 . PMID   22936095.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.