Adverse effects of TMS appear rare and include fainting and seizure, which occur in roughly 0.1% of patients and are usually attributable to administration error.[6]
Medical uses
A magnetic coil is positioned on the patient's head.
TMS does not require surgery or electrode implantation.
Its use can be diagnostic and/or therapeutic. Effects vary based on frequency and intensity of the magnetic pulses as well as the length of treatment, which dictates the total number of pulses given.[8] TMS treatments are approved by the FDA in the US and by NICE in the UK for the treatment of depression and are provided by private clinics and some VA medical centers. TMS stimulates cortical tissue without the pain sensations produced in transcranial electrical stimulation.[9]
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been shown to produce significant clinical improvements in various neurological and psychiatric disorders. A group of European experts updated the therapeutic guidelines, reviewing studies up to the end of 2018. The highest level of evidence, Level A (definite efficacy), was found for high-frequency rTMS of the primary motor cortex (primary motor cortex) for neuropathic pain, high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for depression, and low-frequency rTMS of the contralesional motor cortex for hand motor recovery after stroke. Level B evidence (probable efficacy) was found in conditions such as fibromyalgia, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and post-stroke aphasia, depending on the rTMS protocol used. No other conditions reached Level A or B evidence. These recommendations are based on differences in therapeutic outcomes between real and sham rTMS, replicated in multiple independent studies, although clinical relevance may still vary.[4]
A 2025 consensus review published in the Journal of the Neurological Sciences evaluated current clinical practices and recent advancements in TMS for depression. The review confirms that TMS is a safe and effective treatment modality, with a growing body of evidence supporting its use in treatment-resistant depression. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), particularly high-frequency stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, has demonstrated robust and reproducible acute antidepressant effects in major depressive disorder, with growing evidence supporting its efficacy, durability, and potential superiority over medication in treatment-resistant cases. Traditional repetitive TMS (rTMS) protocols have been well-established, while newer approaches—such as intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) and individualized, image-guided targeting—have shown promise in reducing treatment time and potentially enhancing clinical outcomes.[16]
TMS is generally advertised as a safe alternative to medications such as SSRI's. The greatest immediate risk from TMS is fainting, though this is uncommon. Seizures have been reported, but are rare.[6][22][23]
Risks are higher for therapeutic repetitive TMS (rTMS) than for single or paired diagnostic TMS.[24] Adverse effects generally increase with higher frequency stimulation.[6]
Procedure
During the procedure, a magnetic coil is positioned at the head of the person receiving the treatment using anatomical landmarks on the skull, in particular the inion and nasion.[7] The coil is then connected to a pulse generator, or stimulator, that delivers electric current to the coil.[2]
TMS uses electromagnetic induction to generate an electric current across the scalp and skull.[25][26] A plastic-enclosed coil of wire is held next to the skull and when activated, produces a varying magnetic field oriented orthogonally to the plane of the coil. The changing magnetic field then induces an electric current in the brain that activates nearby nerve cells in a manner similar to a current applied superficially at the cortical surface.[27]
The magnetic field is about the same strength as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the pulse generally reaches no more than 5 centimeters into the brain unless using a modified coil and technique for deeper stimulation.[26]
Transcranial magnetic stimulation is achieved by quickly discharging current from a large capacitor into a coil to produce pulsed magnetic fields between 2 and 3 teslas in strength.[28] Directing the magnetic field pulse at a targeted area in the brain causes a localized electrical current which can then either depolarize or hyperpolarize neurons at that site. The induced electric field inside the brain tissue causes a change in transmembrane potentials resulting in depolarization or hyperpolarization of neurons, causing them to be more or less excitable, respectively.[28]
TMS usually stimulates to a depth from 2 to 4cm below the surface, depending on the coil and intensity used. Consequently, only superficial brain areas can be affected.[29] Deep TMS can reach up to 6cm into the brain to stimulate deeper layers of the motor cortex, such as that which controls leg motion. The path of this current can be difficult to model because the brain is irregularly shaped with variable internal density and water content, leading to a nonuniform magnetic field strength and conduction throughout its tissues.[30]
Frequency and duration
The effects of TMS can be divided based on frequency, duration and intensity (amplitude) of stimulation:[31]
Single or paired pulse TMS causes neurons in the neocortex under the site of stimulation to depolarize and discharge an action potential. If used in the primary motor cortex, it produces muscle activity referred to as a motor evoked potential (MEP) which can be recorded on electromyography. If used on the occipital cortex, 'phosphenes' (flashes of light) might be perceived by the subject. In most other areas of the cortex, there is no conscious effect, but behaviour may be altered (e.g., slower reaction time on a cognitive task), or changes in brain activity may be detected using diagnostic equipment.[32]
Repetitive TMS (rTMS) produces longer-lasting effects which persist past the period of stimulation. rTMS can increase or decrease the excitability of the corticospinal tract depending on the intensity of stimulation, coil orientation, and frequency. Low frequency rTMS with a stimulus frequency less than 1Hz is believed to inhibit cortical firing, while a stimulus frequency greater than 1Hz, referred to as high frequency, is believed to provoke it.[33] Though its mechanism is not clear, it has been suggested as being due to a change in synaptic efficacy related to long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression like plasticity (LTD-like plasticity).[34][35]
Coil types
Most devices use a coil shaped like a figure-eight to deliver a shallow magnetic field that affects more superficial neurons in the brain.[36] Differences in magnetic coil design are considered when comparing results, with important elements including the type of material, geometry and specific characteristics of the associated magnetic pulse.
The core material may be either a magnetically inert substrate ('air core'), or a solid, ferromagnetically active material ('solid core'). Solid cores result in more efficient transfer of electrical energy to a magnetic field and reduce energy loss to heat, and so can be operated with the higher volume of therapy protocols without interruption due to overheating. Varying the geometric shape of the coil itself can cause variations in focality, shape, and depth of penetration. Differences in coil material and its power supply also affect magnetic pulse width and duration.[37]
A number of different types of coils exist, each of which produce different magnetic fields. The round coil is the original used in TMS. Later, the figure-eight (butterfly) coil was developed to provide a more focal pattern of activation in the brain, and the four-leaf coil for focal stimulation of peripheral nerves. The double-cone coil conforms more to the shape of the head.[38] The Hesed (H-core), circular crown and double cone coils allow more widespread activation and a deeper magnetic penetration. They are supposed to impact deeper areas in the motor cortex and cerebellum controlling the legs and pelvic floor, for example, though the increased depth comes at the cost of a less focused magnetic pulse.[6]
For Parkinson's disease, early results suggest that low frequency stimulation may have an effect on medication associated dyskinesia, and that high frequency stimulation improves motor function.[40][41]
The cerebellar cortex as a possible target of TMS has been investigated in combination with electromyography (EMG), and a reduction in the average amplitude of motor-evoked-potentials in small hand muscles has been observed when comparing paired-pulse TMS with a 6-8 ms interstimulus interval between cerebellar TMS and TMS to the primary motor cortex with single-pulse TMS to the primary motor cortex - a phenomenon termed cerebellum brain inhibition (CBI).[42][43] Recent investigations have built upon this phenomenon to investigate the feasibility of combining EEG with cerebellar TMS to find signatures of the cerebellum-to-cerebrum functional connectivity in high temporal resultion.[44] By applying control conditions accounting for multisensory input and concomitant occipital cortex stimulation, and confirming effective cerebellar TMS by assessing CBI beforehand and modelling the induced electric field, EEG signatures of cerebellar TMS were proposed - as they may be utilized as therapeutic biomarkers to test pharmacotherapy efficacy in spinocerebellar ataxia in the future.[45][46][47][48] However, these EEG signatures are still openly debated in the field of Brain Stimulation due to their inconsistency - likely, differing stimulation targets due to the lack of neuronavigation in these studies explain these discrepancies in results.[49][50]
History
Luigi Galvani (1737–1798) undertook research on the effects of electricity on the body in the late-eighteenth century and laid the foundations for the field of electrophysiology.[51] In the 1830s, Michael Faraday (1791–1867) discovered that an electrical current had a corresponding magnetic field, and that changing one could induce its counterpart.[52]
Work to directly stimulate the human brain with electricity started in the late 1800s, and by the 1930s the Italian physicians Cerletti and Bini had developed electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).[51] ECT became widely used to treat mental illness, and ultimately overused, as it began to be seen as a panacea. This led to a backlash in the 1970s.[51]
In 1980, Merton and Morton successfully used transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) to stimulate the motor cortex. However, this process was very uncomfortable, and subsequently Anthony T. Barker began to search for an alternative to TES.[53] He began exploring the use of magnetic fields to alter electrical signaling within the brain, and the first stable TMS devices were developed in 1985.[51][52] They were originally intended as diagnostic and research devices, with evaluation of their therapeutic potential being a later development.[51][52] The United States' FDA first approved TMS devices in October 2008.[51]
Regulatory status
Speech mapping prior to neurosurgery
Nexstim obtained United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act§Section 510(k) clearance for the assessment of the primary motor cortex for pre-procedural planning in December 2009[54] and for neurosurgical planning in June 2011.[55]
Depression
TMS is approved as a Class II medical device under the "de novo pathway".[56][57]
The United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) issues guidance to the National Health Service (NHS) in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (UK). NICE guidance does not cover whether or not the NHS should fund a procedure. Local NHS bodies (primary care trusts and hospital trusts) make decisions about funding after considering the clinical effectiveness of the procedure and whether the procedure represents value for money for the NHS.[68]
NICE evaluated TMS for severe depression in 2007, finding that TMS was safe, but with insufficient evidence for its efficacy.[69] Guidance was updated and replaced in 2015, concluding that evidence for short‑term efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression was adequate, although the clinical response is variable, and ruling that rTMS for depression may be used with arrangements for clinical governance and audit.[70]
In January 2014, NICE reported the results of an evaluation of TMS for treating and preventing migraine (IPG 477). NICE found that short-term TMS is safe but there is insufficient evidence to evaluate safety for long-term and frequent uses. It found that evidence on the efficacy of TMS for the treatment of migraine is limited in quantity, that evidence for the prevention of migraine is limited in both quality and quantity.[71]
As of 2025[update], use of rTMS in the UK was reported to have remained limited due to the cost of equipment and establishing treatment centres. Camilla Nord, head of the Mental Health Neuroscience Lab at the University of Cambridge said, "The NHS has unfortunately been far behind the US and Canada on rTMS, which is at least as effective as antidepressants, if not more".[72]
United States
This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. Last update: February 2014(September 2025)
Commercial health insurance
In 2013, several commercial health insurance plans in the United States, including Anthem, Health Net, Kaiser Permanente, and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska and of Rhode Island, covered TMS for the treatment of depression for the first time.[73][74][75][76] In contrast, UnitedHealthcare issued a medical policy for TMS in 2013 that stated there is insufficient evidence that the procedure is beneficial for health outcomes in patients with depression. UnitedHealthcare noted that methodological concerns raised about the scientific evidence studying TMS for depression include small sample size, lack of a validated sham comparison in randomized controlled studies, and variable uses of outcome measures.[77] Other commercial insurance plans whose 2013 medical coverage policies stated that the role of TMS in the treatment of depression and other disorders had not been clearly established or remained investigational included Aetna, Cigna and Regence.[78][79][80]
Medicare
Policies for Medicare coverage vary among local jurisdictions within the Medicare system,[81] and Medicare coverage for TMS has varied among jurisdictions and with time. For example:
In early 2012 in New England, Medicare covered TMS for the first time in the United States.[82][83][84][85] However, that jurisdiction later decided to end coverage after October, 2013.[86]
In August 2012, the jurisdiction covering Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico determined that there was insufficient evidence to cover the treatment,[87] but the same jurisdiction subsequently determined that Medicare would cover TMS for the treatment of depression after December 2013.[88]
Limitations
There are serious concerns about stimulating brain tissue using non-invasive magnetic field methods such as uncertainty in the dose and localisation of the stimulation effect.[89][90][91][92]
↑ Mann, Sukhmanjeet Kaur; Malhi, Narpinder K. (6 March 2023). "Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)". StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. PMID33760474. Retrieved 1 May 2025.
1 2 Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, etal. (February 2020). "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)". Clin Neurophysiol. 131 (2): 474–528. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. hdl:10362/147799. PMID31901449.
↑ McClintock, S. M.; Carpenter, L. L.; Downar, J.; et al. (2025). "Consensus review and considerations on TMS to treat depression". *Journal of the Neurological Sciences*. 459: 121579. doi:[10.1016/j.jns.2024.121579](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2024.121579).
↑ Nowak DA, Bösl K, Podubeckà J, Carey JR (2010). "Noninvasive brain stimulation and motor recovery after stroke". Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 28 (4): 531–544. doi:10.3233/RNN-2010-0552. PMID20714076.
↑ Chen R, Cros D, Curra A, Di Lazzaro V, Lefaucheur JP, Magistris MR, Mills K, Rösler KM, Triggs WJ, Ugawa Y, Ziemann U (March 2008). "The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: report of an IFCN committee". Clin Neurophysiol. 119 (3): 504–532. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.10.014. PMID18063409.
↑ Mann, Sukhmanjeet Kaur; Malhi, Narpinder K. (6 March 2023). "Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)". StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. PMID33760474. Retrieved 1 May 2025.
↑ McClintock, S. M.; Carpenter, L. L.; Downar, J.; et al. (2025). "Consensus review and considerations on TMS to treat depression". *Journal of the Neurological Sciences*. 459: 121579. doi:[10.1016/j.jns.2024.121579](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2024.121579).
↑ Brini S, Brudasca NI, Hodkinson A, Kaluzinska K, Wach A, Storman D, Prokop-Dorner A, Jemioło P, Bala MM (March 2023). "Efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treating major depressive disorder: An umbrella review and re-analysis of published meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials". Clin Psychol Rev. 100: 102236. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102236. PMID36587461.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
↑ Amad A, Fovet T (January 2022). "rTMS for depression: The difficult transition from research to clinical practice". Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 56 (1): 14–15. doi:10.1177/00048674211011242. PMID33982627.
↑ Razza LB, Moffa AH, Moreno ML, Carvalho AF, Padberg F, Fregni F, Brunoni AR (February 2018). "A systematic review and meta-analysis on placebo response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression trials". Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 81: 105–113. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.10.016. PMID29111404.
↑ Dalhuisen I, van Bronswijk S, Bors J, Smit F, Spijker J, Tendolkar I, Ruhé HG, van Eijndhoven P (October 2022). "The association between sample and treatment characteristics and the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of sham-controlled trials". Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 141: 104848. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104848. hdl:2066/253508. PMID36049675.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: article number as page number (link)
Zangen A, Roth Y, Voller B, Hallett M (April 2005). "Transcranial magnetic stimulation of deep brain regions: evidence for efficacy of the H-coil". Clinical Neurophysiology. 116 (4): 775–9. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.11.008. PMID15792886. S2CID25101101.
↑ Fitzgerald PB, Fountain S, Daskalakis ZJ (December 2006). "A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition". Clinical Neurophysiology. 117 (12): 2584–96. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.06.712. PMID16890483. S2CID31458874.
↑ Bersani, F.S.; Minichino, A.; Enticott, P.G.; Mazzarini, L.; Khan, N.; Antonacci, G.; Raccah, R.N.; Salviati, M.; Delle Chiaie, R.; Bersani, G.; Fitzgerald, P.B.; Biondi, M. (January 2013). "Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for psychiatric disorders: A comprehensive review". European Psychiatry. 28 (1): 30–39. doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2012.02.006. PMID22559998. S2CID29053871.
↑ Roth BJ, Maccabee PJ, Eberle LP, Amassian VE, Hallett M, Cadwell J, etal. (February 1994). "In vitro evaluation of a 4-leaf coil design for magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerve". Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 93 (1): 68–74. doi:10.1016/0168-5597(94)90093-0. PMID7511524.
↑ Sparing R, Mottaghy FM (April 2008). "Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic or direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS)-From insights into human memory to therapy of its dysfunction". Methods. 44 (4): 329–37. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.02.001. PMID18374276.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.