Scalar potential

Last updated November 13, 2024

In mathematical physics, scalar potential describes the situation where the difference in the potential energies of an object in two different positions depends only on the positions, not upon the path taken by the object in traveling from one position to the other. It is a scalar field in three-space: a directionless value (scalar) that depends only on its location. A familiar example is potential energy due to gravity.

A scalar potential is a fundamental concept in vector analysis and physics (the adjective scalar is frequently omitted if there is no danger of confusion with vector potential ). The scalar potential is an example of a scalar field. Given a vector field $F$ , the scalar potential $P$ is defined such that: ^[1] $\mathbf {F} =-\nabla P=-\left({\frac {\partial P}{\partial x}},{\frac {\partial P}{\partial y}},{\frac {\partial P}{\partial z}}\right),$ where $\nabla P$ is the gradient of $P$ and the second part of the equation is minus the gradient for a function of the Cartesian coordinates $x, y, z$ .^[a] In some cases, mathematicians may use a positive sign in front of the gradient to define the potential.^[2] Because of this definition of $P$ in terms of the gradient, the direction of $F$ at any point is the direction of the steepest decrease of $P$ at that point, its magnitude is the rate of that decrease per unit length.

In order for $F$ to be described in terms of a scalar potential only, any of the following equivalent statements have to be true:

$-\int _{a}^{b}\mathbf {F} \cdot d\mathbf {l} =P(\mathbf {b} )-P(\mathbf {a} ),$ where the integration is over a Jordan arc passing from location $a$ to location $b$ and $P (b)$ is $P$ evaluated at location $b$ .
$\oint \mathbf {F} \cdot d\mathbf {l} =0,$ where the integral is over any simple closed path, otherwise known as a Jordan curve.
${\nabla }\times {\mathbf {F} }=0.$

The first of these conditions represents the fundamental theorem of the gradient and is true for any vector field that is a gradient of a differentiable single valued scalar field $P$ . The second condition is a requirement of $F$ so that it can be expressed as the gradient of a scalar function. The third condition re-expresses the second condition in terms of the curl of $F$ using the fundamental theorem of the curl. A vector field $F$ that satisfies these conditions is said to be irrotational (conservative).

Scalar potentials play a prominent role in many areas of physics and engineering. The gravity potential is the scalar potential associated with the gravity per unit mass, i.e., the acceleration due to the field, as a function of position. The gravity potential is the gravitational potential energy per unit mass. In electrostatics the electric potential is the scalar potential associated with the electric field, i.e., with the electrostatic force per unit charge. The electric potential is in this case the electrostatic potential energy per unit charge. In fluid dynamics, irrotational lamellar fields have a scalar potential only in the special case when it is a Laplacian field. Certain aspects of the nuclear force can be described by a Yukawa potential. The potential play a prominent role in the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations of classical mechanics. Further, the scalar potential is the fundamental quantity in quantum mechanics.

Not every vector field has a scalar potential. Those that do are called conservative , corresponding to the notion of conservative force in physics. Examples of non-conservative forces include frictional forces, magnetic forces, and in fluid mechanics a solenoidal field velocity field. By the Helmholtz decomposition theorem however, all vector fields can be describable in terms of a scalar potential and corresponding vector potential. In electrodynamics, the electromagnetic scalar and vector potentials are known together as the electromagnetic four-potential.

Integrability conditions

If $F$ is a conservative vector field (also called irrotational, curl-free, or potential), and its components have continuous partial derivatives, the potential of $F$ with respect to a reference point $r 0$ is defined in terms of the line integral: $V(\mathbf {r} )=-\int _{C}\mathbf {F} (\mathbf {r} )\cdot \,d\mathbf {r} =-\int _{a}^{b}\mathbf {F} (\mathbf {r} (t))\cdot \mathbf {r} '(t)\,dt,$ where $C$ is a parametrized path from $r 0$ to $r$ , $\mathbf {r} (t),a\leq t\leq b,\mathbf {r} (a)=\mathbf {r_{0}} ,\mathbf {r} (b)=\mathbf {r} .$

The fact that the line integral depends on the path $C$ only through its terminal points $r 0$ and $r$ is, in essence, the path independence property of a conservative vector field. The fundamental theorem of line integrals implies that if $V$ is defined in this way, then $F = -\nabla V$ , so that $V$ is a scalar potential of the conservative vector field $F$ . Scalar potential is not determined by the vector field alone: indeed, the gradient of a function is unaffected if a constant is added to it. If $V$ is defined in terms of the line integral, the ambiguity of $V$ reflects the freedom in the choice of the reference point $r 0$ .

Altitude as gravitational potential energy

Plot of a two-dimensional slice of the gravitational potential in and around a uniform spherical body. The inflection points of the cross-section are at the surface of the body. GravityPotential.jpg — Plot of a two-dimensional slice of the gravitational potential in and around a uniform spherical body. The inflection points of the cross-section are at the surface of the body.

An example is the (nearly) uniform gravitational field near the Earth's surface. It has a potential energy $U=mgh$ where $U$ is the gravitational potential energy and $h$ is the height above the surface. This means that gravitational potential energy on a contour map is proportional to altitude. On a contour map, the two-dimensional negative gradient of the altitude is a two-dimensional vector field, whose vectors are always perpendicular to the contours and also perpendicular to the direction of gravity. But on the hilly region represented by the contour map, the three-dimensional negative gradient of $U$ always points straight downwards in the direction of gravity; $F$ . However, a ball rolling down a hill cannot move directly downwards due to the normal force of the hill's surface, which cancels out the component of gravity perpendicular to the hill's surface. The component of gravity that remains to move the ball is parallel to the surface: $\mathbf {F} _{\mathrm {S} }=-mg\ \sin \theta$ where $θ$ is the angle of inclination, and the component of $F S$ perpendicular to gravity is $\mathbf {F} _{\mathrm {P} }=-mg\ \sin \theta \ \cos \theta =-{1 \over 2}mg\sin 2\theta .$ This force $F P$ , parallel to the ground, is greatest when $θ$ is 45 degrees.

Let $Δ h$ be the uniform interval of altitude between contours on the contour map, and let $Δ x$ be the distance between two contours. Then $\theta =\tan ^{-1}{\frac {\Delta h}{\Delta x}}$ so that $F_{P}=-mg{\Delta x\,\Delta h \over \Delta x^{2}+\Delta h^{2}}.$ However, on a contour map, the gradient is inversely proportional to $Δ x$ , which is not similar to force $F P$ : altitude on a contour map is not exactly a two-dimensional potential field. The magnitudes of forces are different, but the directions of the forces are the same on a contour map as well as on the hilly region of the Earth's surface represented by the contour map.

Pressure as buoyant potential

In fluid mechanics, a fluid in equilibrium, but in the presence of a uniform gravitational field is permeated by a uniform buoyant force that cancels out the gravitational force: that is how the fluid maintains its equilibrium. This buoyant force is the negative gradient of pressure: $\mathbf {f_{B}} =-\nabla p.$

Since buoyant force points upwards, in the direction opposite to gravity, then pressure in the fluid increases downwards. Pressure in a static body of water increases proportionally to the depth below the surface of the water. The surfaces of constant pressure are planes parallel to the surface, which can be characterized as the plane of zero pressure.

If the liquid has a vertical vortex (whose axis of rotation is perpendicular to the surface), then the vortex causes a depression in the pressure field. The surface of the liquid inside the vortex is pulled downwards as are any surfaces of equal pressure, which still remain parallel to the liquids surface. The effect is strongest inside the vortex and decreases rapidly with the distance from the vortex axis.

The buoyant force due to a fluid on a solid object immersed and surrounded by that fluid can be obtained by integrating the negative pressure gradient along the surface of the object: $F_{B}=-\oint _{S}\nabla p\cdot \,d\mathbf {S} .$

Scalar potential in Euclidean space

In 3-dimensional Euclidean space ⁠ $\mathbb {R} ^{3}$ ⁠, the scalar potential of an irrotational vector field $E$ is given by $\Phi (\mathbf {r} )={\frac {1}{4\pi }}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{3}}{\frac {\operatorname {div} \mathbf {E} (\mathbf {r} ')}{\left\|\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '\right\|}}\,dV(\mathbf {r} ')$ where $dV (r')$ is an infinitesimal volume element with respect to $r'$ . Then $\mathbf {E} =-\mathbf {\nabla } \Phi =-{\frac {1}{4\pi }}\mathbf {\nabla } \int _{\mathbb {R} ^{3}}{\frac {\operatorname {div} \mathbf {E} (\mathbf {r} ')}{\left\|\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '\right\|}}\,dV(\mathbf {r} ')$ This holds provided $E$ is continuous and vanishes asymptotically to zero towards infinity, decaying faster than $1/ r$ and if the divergence of $E$ likewise vanishes towards infinity, decaying faster than $1/ r 2$ .

Written another way, let $\Gamma (\mathbf {r} )={\frac {1}{4\pi }}{\frac {1}{\|\mathbf {r} \|}}$ be the Newtonian potential. This is the fundamental solution of the Laplace equation, meaning that the Laplacian of $Γ$ is equal to the negative of the Dirac delta function: $\nabla ^{2}\Gamma (\mathbf {r} )+\delta (\mathbf {r} )=0.$ Then the scalar potential is the divergence of the convolution of $E$ with $Γ$ : $\Phi =\operatorname {div} (\mathbf {E} *\Gamma ).$

Indeed, convolution of an irrotational vector field with a rotationally invariant potential is also irrotational. For an irrotational vector field $G$ , it can be shown that $\nabla ^{2}\mathbf {G} =\mathbf {\nabla } (\mathbf {\nabla } \cdot {}\mathbf {G} ).$ Hence $\nabla \operatorname {div} (\mathbf {E} *\Gamma )=\nabla ^{2}(\mathbf {E} *\Gamma )=\mathbf {E} *\nabla ^{2}\Gamma =-\mathbf {E} *\delta =-\mathbf {E}$ as required.

More generally, the formula $\Phi =\operatorname {div} (\mathbf {E} *\Gamma )$ holds in $n$ -dimensional Euclidean space ( $n > 2$ ) with the Newtonian potential given then by $\Gamma (\mathbf {r} )={\frac {1}{n(n-2)\omega _{n}\|\mathbf {r} \|^{n-2}}}$ where $ω n$ is the volume of the unit $n$ -ball. The proof is identical. Alternatively, integration by parts (or, more rigorously, the properties of convolution) gives $\Phi (\mathbf {r} )=-{\frac {1}{n\omega _{n}}}\int _{\mathbb {R} ^{n}}{\frac {\mathbf {E} (\mathbf {r} ')\cdot (\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} ')}{\|\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '\|^{n}}}\,dV(\mathbf {r} ').$

Notes

↑ The second part of this equation is only valid for Cartesian coordinates, other coordinate systems such as cylindrical or spherical coordinates will have more complicated representations, derived from the fundamental theorem of the gradient.

Related Research Articles

In vector calculus, divergence is a vector operator that operates on a vector field, producing a scalar field giving the quantity of the vector field's source at each point. More technically, the divergence represents the volume density of the outward flux of a vector field from an infinitesimal volume around a given point.

In physics, potential energy is the energy held by an object because of its position relative to other objects, stresses within itself, its electric charge, or other factors. The term potential energy was introduced by the 19th-century Scottish engineer and physicist William Rankine, although it has links to the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle's concept of potentiality.

In mathematics and physics, Laplace's equation is a second-order partial differential equation named after Pierre-Simon Laplace, who first studied its properties. This is often written as $or where is the Laplace operator, is the divergence operator, is the gradient operator, and is a twice-differentiable real-valued function. The Laplace operator therefore maps a scalar function to another scalar function.$

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Navier–Stokes equations</span> Equations describing the motion of viscous fluid substances

The Navier–Stokes equations are partial differential equations which describe the motion of viscous fluid substances. They were named after French engineer and physicist Claude-Louis Navier and the Irish physicist and mathematician George Gabriel Stokes. They were developed over several decades of progressively building the theories, from 1822 (Navier) to 1842–1850 (Stokes).

In fluid dynamics, potential flow or irrotational flow refers to a description of a fluid flow with no vorticity in it. Such a description typically arises in the limit of vanishing viscosity, i.e., for an inviscid fluid and with no vorticity present in the flow.

In mathematics, the Laplace operator or Laplacian is a differential operator given by the divergence of the gradient of a scalar function on Euclidean space. It is usually denoted by the symbols $, (where is the nabla operator), or . In a Cartesian coordinate system, the Laplacian is given by the sum of second partial derivatives of the function with respect to each independent variable. In other coordinate systems, such as cylindrical and spherical coordinates, the Laplacian also has a useful form. Informally, the Laplacian Δ f (p) of a function f at a point p measures by how much the average value of f over small spheres or balls centered at p deviates from f (p) .$

Poisson's equation is an elliptic partial differential equation of broad utility in theoretical physics. For example, the solution to Poisson's equation is the potential field caused by a given electric charge or mass density distribution; with the potential field known, one can then calculate the corresponding electrostatic or gravitational (force) field. It is a generalization of Laplace's equation, which is also frequently seen in physics. The equation is named after French mathematician and physicist Siméon Denis Poisson who published it in 1823.

In vector calculus, a conservative vector field is a vector field that is the gradient of some function. A conservative vector field has the property that its line integral is path independent; the choice of path between two points does not change the value of the line integral. Path independence of the line integral is equivalent to the vector field under the line integral being conservative. A conservative vector field is also irrotational; in three dimensions, this means that it has vanishing curl. An irrotational vector field is necessarily conservative provided that the domain is simply connected.

In physics, chemistry, a potential gradient is the local rate of change of the potential with respect to displacement, i.e. spatial derivative, or gradient. This quantity frequently occurs in equations of physical processes because it leads to some form of flux.

A directional derivative is a concept in multivariable calculus that measures the rate at which a function changes in a particular direction at a given point.

In mathematics, Green's identities are a set of three identities in vector calculus relating the bulk with the boundary of a region on which differential operators act. They are named after the mathematician George Green, who discovered Green's theorem.

In physics and mathematics, the Helmholtz decomposition theorem or the fundamental theorem of vector calculus states that certain differentiable vector fields can be resolved into the sum of an irrotational (curl-free) vector field and a solenoidal (divergence-free) vector field. In physics, often only the decomposition of sufficiently smooth, rapidly decaying vector fields in three dimensions is discussed. It is named after Hermann von Helmholtz.

In differential geometry, the four-gradient $is the four-vector analogue of the gradient from vector calculus.$

The gradient theorem, also known as the fundamental theorem of calculus for line integrals, says that a line integral through a gradient field can be evaluated by evaluating the original scalar field at the endpoints of the curve. The theorem is a generalization of the second fundamental theorem of calculus to any curve in a plane or space rather than just the real line.

There are various mathematical descriptions of the electromagnetic field that are used in the study of electromagnetism, one of the four fundamental interactions of nature. In this article, several approaches are discussed, although the equations are in terms of electric and magnetic fields, potentials, and charges with currents, generally speaking.

In mathematical physics, spacetime algebra (STA) is the application of Clifford algebra Cl_1,3(R), or equivalently the geometric algebra G(M⁴) to physics. Spacetime algebra provides a "unified, coordinate-free formulation for all of relativistic physics, including the Dirac equation, Maxwell equation and General Relativity" and "reduces the mathematical divide between classical, quantum and relativistic physics."

In fluid mechanics and mathematics, a capillary surface is a surface that represents the interface between two different fluids. As a consequence of being a surface, a capillary surface has no thickness in slight contrast with most real fluid interfaces.

The derivatives of scalars, vectors, and second-order tensors with respect to second-order tensors are of considerable use in continuum mechanics. These derivatives are used in the theories of nonlinear elasticity and plasticity, particularly in the design of algorithms for numerical simulations.

In mathematics, a line integral is an integral where the function to be integrated is evaluated along a curve. The terms path integral, curve integral, and curvilinear integral are also used; contour integral is used as well, although that is typically reserved for line integrals in the complex plane.

Curvilinear coordinates can be formulated in tensor calculus, with important applications in physics and engineering, particularly for describing transportation of physical quantities and deformation of matter in fluid mechanics and continuum mechanics.

References

↑ Goldstein, Herbert (1980). Classical Mechanics (2 ed.). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. pp. 3–4. ISBN 978-0-201-02918-5.
↑ See for an example where the potential is defined without a negative. Other references such as Louis Leithold, The Calculus with Analytic Geometry (5 ed.), p. 1199 avoid using the term potential when solving for a function from its gradient.

External links

Media related to Scalar potential at Wikimedia Commons

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[2] The second part of this equation is only valid for Cartesian coordinates, other coordinate systems such as cylindrical or spherical coordinates will have more complicated representations, derived from the fundamental theorem of the gradient.

[1] Goldstein, Herbert (1980). Classical Mechanics (2 ed.). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. pp. 3–4. ISBN 978-0-201-02918-5.

[3] See for an example where the potential is defined without a negative. Other references such as Louis Leithold, The Calculus with Analytic Geometry (5 ed.), p. 1199 avoid using the term potential when solving for a function from its gradient.

[1]

[a]

[2]