Universal Camouflage Pattern

Last updated

Universal Camouflage Pattern
Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP).jpg
A sample of the UCP pattern
Type Military camouflage pattern
Place of originUnited States
Service history
In service2005–2019 (U.S. Army) [a] [b]
Used by State Defense Forces
See Users for non-U.S. users
Wars(In U.S. service):
War in Afghanistan
Iraq War
(In Non-U.S. service):
Mexican drug war
Insurgency in Northern Chad
Second Nagorno-Karabakh War
Syrian civil war
Yemeni civil war
Myanmar civil war [3]
Russo-Ukrainian War
Production history
Designed2004
Produced2004–present
VariantsUniversal Camouflage Pattern Delta (UCP–D) [4]

The Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP) is a digital camouflage pattern formerly used by the United States Army in their Army Combat Uniform. [5] [6]

Contents

Laboratory and field tests from 2003 to 2004 showed a pattern named "All-Over Brush" to provide the best concealment of the patterns tested. [7] At the end of the trials, Desert Brush was selected as the winner over 12 other experimental patterns. [note 1] [note 2] [note 3] [8] [9] [10] [11] The winning Desert Brush pattern was not used as the final Universal pattern. Instead, U.S. Army leadership utilized pixelated patterns of Canadian CADPAT and U.S. Marine Corps MARPAT, then recolored them based on three universal colors developed in the Army's 2003 to 2004 tests, to be called UCP with significantly less disruptive capability than either of its prior familial patterns. [7] [12] [13] The final UCP was then adopted without field testing against other patterns. [7]

Soldiers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan questioned the UCP's effectiveness as a concealment method. Some felt that it was endangering their missions and their lives. [7] In response, the U.S. Army conducted several studies to find a modification or replacement for the standard issue pattern. [14] In July 2014, [15] [16] the Army announced that Operational Camouflage Pattern would replace all UCP-patterned ACU uniforms by the end of September 2019. [17] [18] However, UCP remains in service in limited capacities, such as on some cold weather overgear and older body armor. [1]

Selection

In May 2001 to June 2004, [8] the United States Army's Universal Camouflage For The Future Warrior trials were a uniform camouflage enhancement program, to at first make environment-specific patterns, to then later make a pattern that would mask the wearer in all environments. [8] [9] [10] The disadvantage of an all-in-one pattern is that it has to account for too many factors at once, such as amount of visual clutter [19] (disruptiveness–Woodland dark and high contrast, dense foliage branches, [20] [21] Desert sparse, bright and low contrast terrain and Urban close-range geometric straight-edge terrain of buildings and houses [22] ), and at nighttime specifically, high reflectance variation when viewed through night vision devices (Woodland environment's leaves extremely high reflectance versus Desert's grains of sand and rocks' lower reflectance). [20] [21] [23]

Development

In 2002, three patterns were developed, called All-Over Brush , Track , and Shadowline. For each pattern, there were four color combinations, which corresponded to a specific type of terrain, however, all four patterns used tan as their base color. [9] [10]

There were 15 evaluations total, which took place at locations across the contiguous United States. [9] [10]

Phase I

A 2002 U.S. Army pattern popularity poll, unrelated to scientific data used during the trials PDN Levels RGB Input255 0 Output255 0.40 10, Auto-level aka Lvls RGB In255 82 Out255 2.38 0, AKVIS Shrps25 HC-N, PDN Cropped - 2002 Army Times UCFW Camouflage Pattern Poll Swatch Table Scan(.png).jpg
A 2002 U.S. Army pattern popularity poll, unrelated to scientific data used during the trials

In late 2002, the camouflage patterns were rated on their blending, brightness, contrast, and detection by U.S. Army soldiers, during the daytime, and also at night using Near-Infrared (NIR) night vision devices. During Phase I of testing, only daytime evaluations were conducted. Due to the more time efficient and cost-effective method of printing via inkjet sprayers, colors of the patterns were adjusted to how they would be viewed when under NIR conditions. [note 4] [10] Inkjet reactive and acid dyes [24] are not NIR compliant. For the remainder of the phases, production printing with regular dyes and mechanical rollers were used. [9] [10] [24] Scorpion (Unmodified) was included in Phase I of the trials. [note 5] [20] [21]

Following testing, the Shadowline pattern was eliminated, along with the urban and desert-urban colorways of All-Over Brush. All four of the Track patterns were accepted along with All-Over Brush's woodland and desert colorways. [9] [10]

Phases II and III

Finalized Urban Track (4th place), prototyped first between late 2002 to early 2003 Phase II & IV Track Urban Camo Close-Up Swatch.png
Finalized Urban Track (4th place), prototyped first between late 2002 to early 2003
Finalized Desert Brush (1st place) Phase II & IV All-Over Brush Desert Camo Close-Up Swatch.png
Finalized Desert Brush (1st place)

In 2003, the patterns were then modified and tested alongside a "Contractor-Developed Mod" pattern, Scorpion, developed in conjunction with Crye Precision. Phase II's near-infrared nighttime testing determined that black, medium gray, and medium tan were the only colors that gave acceptable performance. [note 6] [9] [10]

Phase IV (System level)

UCFW trials Phase IV contenders (not ordered by placement) in early 2004. To the right is Urban Track II, predecessor of UCP PDN HS 0 50 0 0.00 Shrpns 1.00 0.00 x2 Curves+ RGB Blue 135 115 BC 0 10 A-L 105%25-H-Bc, AKVIS HC-N - UCFW Trials Phase IV (Woodland Day Test) - FFW Ensemble Desert Brush, Scorpion Mod, Woodland Track Mod, and Urban Track Picture.png
UCFW trials Phase IV contenders (not ordered by placement) in early 2004. To the right is Urban Track II, predecessor of UCP

In 2004, all four remaining patterns, Desert Brush, Woodland Track Mod, Scorpion Mod, and Urban Track were then tested alongside each other in two sets of evaluations in woodland, desert, and urban environments. Full Future Force Warrior ensembles were fabricated for testing. [9] [10]

Results

The Desert Brush design received the best overall mean daytime visual rating. The Contractor-Developed Mod pattern received highest rating in woodland environments, but low ratings in desert and urban environments. Urban Track was generally the 3rd or 4th worst performer at each site, but was the best performer in nighttime environments. Infrared testing showed negligible differences in the performance of the four patterns. Natick rated the patterns from best to worst as: Desert Brush, Woodland Track Mod, Contractor-Developed Mod (Scorpion), and Urban Track. [8] [9] [10]

Color selection

Two soldiers in 2005 wearing the Army Combat Uniform in the Universal Camouflage Pattern Army Combat Uniform.jpg
Two soldiers in 2005 wearing the Army Combat Uniform in the Universal Camouflage Pattern

The color scheme of the UCP is composed of tan (officially named Desert Sand 500), gray (Urban Gray 501), and sage green (Foliage Green 502). [25] The pattern is notable for its elimination of the color black. [26] Justification given for the omission of black was that black is a color not commonly found in nature. [27] Pure black viewed through night vision goggles can appear extremely dark and create an undesirable high-contrast image.[ citation needed ]

Controversy

U.S. soldiers in May 2017 wearing the ACU in UCP 170514-N-FV745-0256 - Philippine soldier prepares to fire off a mortar round with U.S. Army soldiers.jpg
U.S. soldiers in May 2017 wearing the ACU in UCP
U.S. Army soldiers in May 2006, wearing the Universal Camouflage Pattern in Kunar Province, Afghanistan US Army Afghanistan 2006.jpg
U.S. Army soldiers in May 2006, wearing the Universal Camouflage Pattern in Kunar Province, Afghanistan

The U.S. Army incorrectly reported to the media that the basis for the UCP was the Urban Track pattern,[ citation needed ] which had been modified through the removal of black from the pattern and pixelated and then reverted in the interest of effectiveness. [7] Pattern comparisons subsequently established that the information provided by the U.S. Army was incorrect, and that the pattern was simply a three-colored version of MARPAT, a derivative of the Canadian CADPAT scheme. No evidence has been presented by the U.S. Army that the new UCP pattern had undergone proper field testing. [7] In later tests conducted by the Natick Soldier Center, results indicated that UCP did not fare well against other multi-environment patterns. [28] [29] [30] [ permanent dead link ‍]

Following building criticism of the poor effectiveness of the pattern in most terrains in the Afghan and Middle Eastern theaters of operations, the use of the pattern was discussed within the U.S. Congress. A bill passed by Congress in 2009 ordered the Department of Defense to "take immediate action to provide combat uniforms to personnel deployed to Afghanistan with a camouflage pattern that is suited to the environment of Afghanistan." [31] [29] In the interim the Army conducted a brief in-country test of replacements for use in Afghanistan that included "UCP Delta", a variant of UCP that added coyote brown, and the commercial pattern MultiCam, which had been created by Crye Precision based on the Scorpion pattern from 2002. MultiCam was quickly selected and issued to all troops deployed to Afghanistan.

Replacement

In 2014, the United States Army announced the replacement of UCP. [32] On 31 July 2014, the Army formally announced that a modified version of the original Scorpion pattern, Scorpion W2, had been chosen as the new Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP), which would begin being issued on uniforms in summer 2015. Authorization of UCP uniforms ended on 1 October 2019, [17] [18] [33] though still sees some limited usage on other gear such as some body armor and cold weather overgear.

As the Army began phasing out UCP, many state defense forces began adopting it as their uniform. [34] [35]

Users

Indian Air Force camouflage uniform adopted in 2022 IAF Camouflage 2022 - Model.jpg
Indian Air Force camouflage uniform adopted in 2022
SAJ ACUPAT camo.jpg
SAJ M4 rifle.JPG
Serbian gendarmes wearing UCP-patterned BDUs

Current

Former

See also

Other CADPAT-derived digital camouflage:

Notes

  1. ↑ Some limited usage from 2004 to 2005 for prototype testing.
  2. ↑ Discontinued on uniforms in 2019, now only remains in service in limited capacities such as on some cold weather equipment, overgear, and older body armor. [1] [2]
  3. ↑ Some limited usage from 2004 to 2005 for prototype testing.
  4. ↑ Discontinued on uniforms in 2019, now only remains in service in limited capacities such as on some cold weather equipment, overgear, and older body armor. [1] [59]
  1. ↑ EXPERIMENTAL PATTERNS BY ENVIRONMENTAL CATEGORY ONLY - Desert Brush won over 12 other experimental patterns; Desert Brush beat: (BRUSH): (1)Woodland I-II, (X)not Desert I-III, it won, (2)Urban I, (3)Desert-Urban I, (TRACK): (4)Woodland I-III, (5)Desert I-II, (6)Urban I-IIIA/B, (7)Desert-Urban I-II, (SHADOWLINE): (8)Woodland, (9)Desert, (10)Urban, (11)Desert-Urban, (SCORPION): (12)Transitional/Multi-Environment I-II; – (dugas.ppt slides 7, 14,15, 19)
  2. ↑ EXPERIMENTAL PATTERNS BY EACH COLORWAY, MINUS PHASE I INKJETS - Desert Brush II won over 15 other experimental camouflage pattern colorways; Desert Brush beat: (BRUSH): (1)Woodland I-II, (X)not Desert I-II, it won, (2)Desert III, (3)Urban I, (4)Desert-Urban I, (TRACK): (5)Woodland I-II, (6)Woodland III, (7)Desert I-II, (8)Urban I-II (9)Urban IIIA/B(both look super similar), (10)Desert-Urban I-II, (SHADOWLINE): (11)Woodland, (12)Desert, (13)Urban, (14)Desert-Urban, (SCORPION): (15)Transitional/Multi-Environment I-II; – (dugas.ppt slides 7, 14,15, 19)
  3. ↑ STANDARD PATTERNS IN ADDITION TO EXPERIMENTAL PATTERNS BY EACH COLORWAY, MINUS PHASE I INKJETS - Desert Brush II won over 19 (20 w/ experimental MARPAT Urban, 19 w/o) other patterns; Desert Brush beat: (BRUSH): (1)Woodland I-II, (X)not Desert I-II, it won, (2)Desert III, (3)Urban I, (4)Desert-Urban I, (TRACK): (5)Woodland I-II, (6)Woodland III, (7)Desert I-II, (8)Urban I-II (9)Urban IIIA/B(both look super similar), (10)Desert-Urban I-II, (SHADOWLINE): (11)Woodland, (12)Desert, (13)Urban, (14)Desert-Urban, (SCORPION): (15)Transitional/Multi-Environment I-II(no idea whats different from mod vs unmod); (Std): (16)US Woodlands, (17)Tricolor Desert, (18)MARPAT Woodland, (19)MARPAT Desert, (? 20)MARPAT Urban – (dugas.ppt slides 7, 14,15, 19)
  4. ↑ "From Phase I to II, inkjets were printed to incorporate NIR attributes." - (dugas.ppt slide 16 in speaker notes)
  5. ↑ "“Crye” (Scorpion) is the camouflage intended for all environments that... was included in evaluations." - ln 54-56 of Better blend (The Warrior article) website archive, not PDF, Nov 2002 (before start of early 2003 tests) full: "“Crye” is the camouflage intended for all environments that’s now being modeled by Objective Force Warrior and was included in evaluations."
  6. ↑ (dugas.ppt slide 16)

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Desert Battle Dress Uniform</span> US arid-environment camouflage uniform

The Desert Battle Dress Uniform (DBDU) is a U.S. arid-environment camouflage battle uniform that was used by the United States Armed Forces from the early 1980s to the early to mid 1990s, most notably during the Persian Gulf War. Although the U.S. military has long since abandoned the pattern, it is still in widespread use by militaries across the world as of the early 2020s.

<i>Flecktarn</i> German military camouflage pattern

Flecktarn is a family of three-, four-, five- or six-color disruptive camouflage patterns, the most common being the five-color pattern, consisting of dark green, grey-green, red brown, and black over a light green or tan base depending on the manufacturer. The original German five-color pattern was designed for use in European temperate woodland terrain. A three-color variation called Tropentarn is intended for arid and desert conditions; the German Bundeswehr wore it in Afghanistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MARPAT</span> US Marine Corps camouflage pattern

MARPAT is a multi-scale camouflage pattern in use with the United States Marine Corps, designed in 2001 and introduced from late 2002 to early 2005 with the Marine Corps Combat Utility Uniform (MCCUU), which replaced the Camouflage Utility Uniform. Its design and concept are based on the Canadian CADPAT pattern. The pattern is formed of small rectangular pixels of color. In theory, it is a far more effective camouflage than standard uniform patterns because it mimics the dappled textures and rough boundaries found in natural settings. It is also known as the "digital pattern" or "digi-cammies" because of its micropattern (pixels) rather than the old macropattern.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle Dress Uniform</span> Fatigues used by the US Armed Forces from early 1980s to mid-2000s

The Battle Dress Uniform (BDU) is a camouflaged combat uniform that was used by the United States Armed Forces as their standard combat uniform from the early 1980s to the mid-2000s. Since then, it has been replaced or supplanted in every branch of the U.S. Armed Forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Army Combat Uniform</span> Combat utility uniform of the United States Army, Air Force, and Space Force

The Army Combat Uniform (ACU) is the current combat uniform worn by the United States Army, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Space Force and some elements of the U.S. Coast Guard. Within the Air Force and Space Force, it is referred to as the OCP Uniform, rather than the Army Combat Uniform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disruptive Pattern Material</span> Camouflage pattern used in British and some Commonwealth militaries

Disruptive Pattern Material (DPM) is the commonly used name of a camouflage pattern used by the British Armed Forces as well as many other armed forces worldwide, particularly in former British colonies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military camouflage</span> Camouflage used to protect from enemy observation

Military camouflage is the use of camouflage by an armed force to protect personnel and equipment from observation by enemy forces. In practice, this means applying colour and materials to military equipment of all kinds, including vehicles, ships, aircraft, gun positions and battledress, either to conceal it from observation (crypsis), or to make it appear as something else (mimicry). The French slang word camouflage came into common English usage during World War I when the concept of visual deception developed into an essential part of modern military tactics. In that war, long-range artillery and observation from the air combined to expand the field of fire, and camouflage was widely used to decrease the danger of being targeted or enable surprise. As such, military camouflage is a form of military deception in addition to cultural functions such as political identification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tiger stripe camouflage</span> Type of camouflage pattern

Tiger stripe is the name of a group of camouflage patterns developed for close-range use in dense jungle during jungle warfare by the South Vietnamese Armed Forces and adopted in late 1962 to early 1963 by US Special Forces during the Vietnam War. During and after the Vietnam War, the pattern was adopted by several other Asian countries. It derives its name from its resemblance to a tiger's stripes and were simply called "tigers." It features narrow stripes that look like brush-strokes of green and brown, and broader brush-strokes of black printed over a lighter shade of olive or khaki. The brush-strokes interlock rather than overlap, as in French Lizard pattern (TAP47) from which it apparently derives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MultiCam</span> Camouflage pattern

MultiCam is a camouflage pattern designed for use in a wide range of environments and conditions which was developed and is produced by American company Crye Precision. The pattern has found extensive adoption globally. Variants of it, some unlicensed, are in use with militaries worldwide, particularly with special forces/special operations forces units.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Desert Camouflage Uniform</span> Arid-environment camouflage uniform used by U.S. military from mid-1990s to early 2010s

The Desert Camouflage Uniform (DCU) is an arid-environment camouflage uniform that was used by the United States Armed Forces from the mid-1990s to the early 2010s. In terms of pattern and textile cut, it is identical to the U.S. military's Battle Dress Uniform (BDU) uniform, but features a three-color desert camouflage pattern of dark brown, pale olive green, and beige, as opposed to the four-color woodland pattern of the BDU. It replaced the previous Desert Battle Dress Uniform (DBDU) which featured a six-color "chocolate chip" pattern of beige, pale olive green, two tones of brown, and black and white rock spots. Although completely phased out of frontline use in the U.S. Armed Forces, some pieces and equipment printed in the DCU camouflage pattern are used in limited numbers such as MOPP suits and/or vests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boonie hat</span> Wide-brim hat commonly used by military forces in hot tropical climates

A boonie hat or booney hat is a type of wide-brim sun hat commonly used by military forces in hot tropical climates. Its design is similar to a bucket hat but with a stiffer brim.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine Corps Combat Utility Uniform</span> Uniform

The Marine Corps Combat Utility Uniform (MCCUU) is the current battledress uniform of the United States Marine Corps. It is also worn by Navy personnel assigned to Marine Corps units.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">U.S. Army universal camouflage trials</span> U.S. Army program to find universally effective camouflage

The U.S. Army universal camouflage trials took place from 2002 to 2004 with the goal of creating a single pattern that would provide adequate concealment in all environments. Four different patterns in a total of 13 variations were tested during the evaluation: three woodland patterns, three desert, three urban, three desert/urban, and one multi-environment pattern. The Universal Camouflage Pattern was eventually adopted despite not having been part of the test. Brigadier General James Moran, the Director of PEO-Soldier, overrode the testing data and directed the adoption of this untested pattern of camouflage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">U.S. Woodland</span> 1980s military camouflage pattern

The U.S. Woodland is a camouflage pattern that was used as the default camouflage pattern issued to the United States Armed Forces from 1981, with the issue of the Battle Dress Uniform, until its replacement in the mid to late 2000s. It is a four color, high contrast disruptive pattern with irregular markings in green, brown, sand and black. It is also known unofficially by its colloquial moniker of "M81" after the Battle Dress Uniform it was first used on, though this term was not officially used by the U.S. military.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Multi-scale camouflage</span> Type of camouflage that combines patterns

Multi-scale camouflage is a type of military camouflage combining patterns at two or more scales, often with a digital camouflage pattern created with computer assistance. The function is to provide camouflage over a range of distances, or equivalently over a range of scales, in the manner of fractals, so some approaches are called fractal camouflage. Not all multiscale patterns are composed of rectangular pixels, even if they were designed using a computer. Further, not all pixellated patterns work at different scales, so being pixellated or digital does not of itself guarantee improved performance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M05</span> Finnish military camouflage

The M05, sometimes known as the M05 Camouflage, is a family of military camouflage patterns used by the Finnish Defence Forces on uniforms and other equipment. The pattern is licensed by the Finnish Defence Forces and became available to the public on 26 September 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Camouflage Central-Europe</span> French woodland camouflage pattern

The Camouflage Central-Europe is the standard camouflage pattern of the French Armed Forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CADPAT</span> Computer-generated digital camouflage pattern used by the Canadian Armed Forces

The Canadian Disruptive Pattern is the computer-generated digital camouflage pattern developed for use by the Canadian Armed Forces. Four operational variations of CADPAT have been used by the Canadian Armed Forces: a temperate woodland pattern, an arid regions pattern, a winter operations pattern, and a multi-terrain pattern.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operational Camouflage Pattern</span> United States military camouflage pattern

Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP), originally codenamed Scorpion W2, is a military camouflage pattern adopted in 2015 by the United States Army for use as the U.S. Army's main camouflage pattern on the Army Combat Uniform (ACU). This pattern officially replaced the U.S. Army's previous Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP) as the official combat uniform pattern for most U.S. soldiers at the end of September 2019. The pattern also superseded the closely related MultiCam, a pattern previously used for troops deploying to Afghanistan.

The Navy Working Uniform (NWU) is a series of military uniforms that are currently used by the United States Navy for wear by its members. The NWU is a "working" uniform, which means that it is made to a more durable and utilitarian standard, thus being worn in lieu of more formal uniforms that might get unduly damaged or dirtied in the process of normal military duties.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Say Goodbye to the Hated Army UCP Uniform". October 2019. Archived from the original on 8 October 2019. Retrieved 8 October 2019.
  2. ↑ image.jpg (JPG). Archived from the original on 1 June 2020.
  3. ↑ Myanmar: The Rebel Army. ARTE. April 18, 2024
  4. ↑ "UCP-D:This Is What Happened The Last Time The US Army Created A Pixelated Camo Pattern - Soldier Systems Daily". 10 March 2014. Archived from the original on 16 August 2017. Retrieved 16 August 2017.
  5. ↑ "We should permanently post more U.S. troops abroad. For their own sake". Newsweek. 28 August 2017. Archived from the original on 29 August 2017. Retrieved 28 August 2017.
  6. ↑ "ACU Presentation". ArmyStudyGuide.com. Archived from the original on 7 March 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2009.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cramer, Guy (21 May 2013). "U.S. Army Camouflage Improvement Explained". www.hyperstealth.com. Archived from the original on 8 June 2013. Retrieved 25 December 2024.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Dugas, A.; Zupkofska, K. J.; DiChiara, A.; Kramer, F. M. (December 2004) [See also ADM001736, Proceedings for the Army Science Conference (24th) Held on 29 November - 2 December 2005 in Orlando, Florida.]. "Universal Camouflage for the Future Warrior" (PDF). US Army Natick Soldier Center (NSC) (Technical Report - NISO Form 298). Natick, MA: US Army Research, Development & Engineering Command (RDECOM). ADA433081. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 May 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2009– via Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dugas, Anabela; Kramer, F. M. (15 December 2004). "dugas.ppt as .PDF" (PDF). Mil-spec Monkey (Presented at biannual International Soldier Systems Center Conference (ISSC) from 13-16 December 2004). Individual Protection Directorate (IPD), Supporting Science & Technology Directorate. US Army Natick Soldier Center (NSC); US Army Research, Development & Engineering Command (RDECOM). Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 December 2019. Retrieved 14 June 2024– via Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dugas, Anabela; Kramer, F. M. (15 December 2004). "dugas.ppt". Individual Protection Directorate (IPD), Supporting Science & Technology Directorate. US Army Natick Soldier Center (NSC). US Army Research, Development & Engineering Command (RDECOM). Archived from the original on 11 August 2013. Retrieved 29 June 2009– via Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).
  11. ↑ Carroll, Ward (9 April 2007). "Defense Tech: Singing the ACU Blues". Defense Tech (archived, original link dead between 16 August 2017 - 5 November 2018 (at 12:07:41 AM and 1:18:13 AM EDT)). Military Advantage, A Monster Company. Archived from the original on 22 July 2012. Retrieved 9 October 2012.
  12. ↑ "Facts: Army Combat Uniform". U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command Office of the Chief of Public affairs (archived, original link dead sometime between 20 August 2012 - 22 September 2012 (at 7:25:01 AM EDT and 11:27:07 AM EDT)). U.S. Army. 14 June 2004. Archived from the original on 20 August 2012. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
  13. ↑ Cramer, Guy (13 July 2004). "Dual Texture - U.S. Army Digital Camouflage" (exact date (at start of end links, highlighted by black rectangle outline spanning entire width of page): https:// web.archive.org/web/20201112035440/http://www.hyperstealth.com/CADPAT-MARPAT.htm). United Dynamics Corp. Archived from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 10 July 2009.
  14. ↑ Engber, Daniel (6 July 2012). "Lost in the Wilderness, the Military's Misadventures in Pixelated Camouflage". State. Archived from the original on 27 September 2012. Retrieved 27 September 2012.
  15. ↑ Gould, Joe (31 July 2014). "Army Announces Rollout Date for New Camo". Army Times. Gannett. Archived from the original on 1 August 2014.
  16. ↑ "Army Selects New Camouflage Pattern". Military.com. 23 May 2014. Archived from the original on 24 May 2014. Retrieved 23 May 2014.
  17. 1 2 "Army Combat Uniform Summary of Changes" (PDF). United States Army . Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 December 2016.
  18. 1 2 "New OCP Uniform Fielding Update". Archived from the original on 1 July 2016. Retrieved 23 September 2016.
  19. ↑ Ramsley, Alvin O. (July 1979). "Camouflage Patterns - Effects of Size and Color" (PDF). p. 15. Archived from the original on 3 November 2015. Retrieved 25 December 2024– via Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).
  20. 1 2 3 Biberdorf, Curt (November 2002). "Better Blend - Camouflage patterns for future uniforms undergo evaluation". SBCCOM Website Blue (The Warrior Magazine). Archived from the original on 22 April 2003. Retrieved 31 July 2024.
  21. 1 2 3 Biberdorf, Curt (November 2002). "Better Blend - Camouflage patterns for future uniforms undergo evaluation" (PDF). SBCCOM Website Blue (The Warrior Magazine). Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 January 2004. Retrieved 2 August 2024.
  22. ↑ "Urban Camouflage". The Warrior Magazine (-!-) (Webarchive = Less Ads) (-!-). NSC Public Affairs Office. May 1996. Archived from the original on 11 February 2011. Retrieved 29 August 2024– via Global Security Website.
  23. ↑ Cramer, Guy (11 June 2013). "Why US4CES?". www.hyperstealth.com. (See Spectral Varieties Over Land data chart nearly half way through the article). Archived from the original on 22 June 2013. Retrieved 27 December 2024.
  24. 1 2 "Facility sifts out camouflage design duds". Soldier Systems Center (SSC) Website Yellow (Press Release - CEF Tour). NATICK, Mass. 30 July 2004. Archived from the original on 16 October 2004. Retrieved 2 August 2024.
  25. ↑ "Update of Army NSC Airdrop/Air Delivery Equipment Color Transition". Natick Soldier Center (NSC) website. Archived from the original on 12 November 2005. Retrieved 26 December 2024.
  26. ↑ Cramer, Guy (2004). "New Digital U.S. Army Combat Uniform eliminates Black in pattern". HyperStealth Biotechnology Corp. Archived from the original on 1 September 2009. Retrieved 27 June 2009.
  27. ↑ "Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Army Combat Uniform". Program Executive Office Soldier. U.S. Army. 24 February 2012. Archived from the original on 14 February 2013.
  28. ↑ Rock, Kathryn; Lesher, Larry; Stewardson, Cheryl; Isherwood, Kristine; Hepfinger, Lisa (23 June 2009). "Photosimulation Camouflage Detection Test" (PDF). Natick Soldier Center (NSC). NATICK/TR-09-021L; 63001. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 July 2024. Retrieved 25 December 2024– via Soldier Systems Daily (SSD).
  29. 1 2 Hepfinger, Lisa; Stewardson, Cheryl; Rock, Kathryn; Leshner, Larry L.; Kramer, F. Matthew; McIntosh, Scotlund; Patterson, Joseph; Isherwood, Kristine; Rogers, Glenn; Nguyen, Hien (December 2010). "Soldier Camouflage for Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF): Pattern-in-Picture (PIP) Technique for Expredient Human-in-the-Loop Camouflage Assessment" (PDF). US Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center, 15 Kansas Street, Natick, MA, 01760-5020 (To be presented at the 27th Army Science Conference, JW Marriott Grande Lakes, Orlando, Florida, November 29 - December 2, 2010). ADA532947. Retrieved 25 December 2024– via Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).
  30. ↑ Cox, William (17 September 2009). "UCP Fares Poorly in Army Camo Test". Army Times (Army Times unable to be webarchived, all articles are now lost media - 16 December 2024). Army Times Publishing Company. Retrieved 17 September 2009.
  31. 1 2 Maze, Rick (21 June 2009). "Troops in Afghanistan would get new uniforms". Army Times. Army Times Publishing Company. Archived from the original on 4 September 2009. Retrieved 13 August 2009.
  32. ↑ Dickson, Caitlin (14 October 2013). "The Army's $5 Billion New Uniform Already Being Replaced". The Daily Beast. IAC/InterActiveCorp. Archived from the original on 22 January 2014. Retrieved 25 January 2014.
  33. ↑ Cox, Matthew (6 August 2014). "Army Unveils Design Changes for New Camo Uniform". Military.com. Military Advantage, A Monster Company. Archived from the original on 10 August 2014. Retrieved 7 August 2014.
  34. ↑ "What is the CSMR?". California State Military Reserve. Archived from the original on 21 May 2018. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
  35. ↑ Mendie, Ubon (16 September 2010). "New York Guard Members to Begin Wearing Modified ACU". dmna.ny.gov. Archived from the original on 21 May 2018. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
  36. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 127.
  37. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 199.
  38. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 132.
  39. ↑ Larsen (2021), p. 19.
  40. ↑ "SOLDADO | TROPA PROFESIONAL" [Soldier | Professional Troop]. fach.mil.cl (in Spanish).
  41. 1 2 "Mike DreisĀ"s - Operator Editor - Gallery 2". Archived from the original on 16 October 2019. Retrieved 20 October 2019.
  42. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 219.
  43. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 394.
  44. ↑ "What are the Camouflage Uniforms of Para SF, MARCOS, and Garud Commandos?". Archived from the original on 6 October 2019. Retrieved 6 October 2019.
  45. ↑ "IAF ground staff get new digital camouflage uniform". 9 October 2022.
  46. ↑ Larsen (2021), p. 243.
  47. ↑ "Kazakhstan - Camopedia". Archived from the original on 18 December 2021. Retrieved 18 December 2021.[ better source needed ]
  48. ↑ "Agensi Penguatkuasaan Maritim Malaysia Jabatan Perdana Menteri" [Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency Prime Minister's Department](PDF). mmea.gov.my (in Malay). Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 August 2018. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  49. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 166.
  50. ↑ "Specijalne-jedinice.com | Special Anti-terrorist Unit of the Republic of Montenegro". Archived from the original on 22 August 2018. Retrieved 22 August 2018.
  51. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 414.
  52. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 173.
  53. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 309.
  54. ↑ "Specijalne-jedinice.com | Special Anti-terrorist Unit-SAU". Archived from the original on 22 July 2018. Retrieved 22 August 2018.
  55. ↑ "Specijalne-jedinice.com | Gendarmerie of the Republic of Serbia". Archived from the original on 22 July 2018. Retrieved 22 August 2018.
  56. ↑ "Taliban, Tajikistan embroiled in battle of words, saber-rattling". Eurasianet. Retrieved 23 June 2024.
  57. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 461.
  58. ↑ Larson (2021), p. 315.
  59. ↑ "Security in front of the Georgia State Capitol". stripes.com. Archived from the original on 28 April 2021.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.