West Kent | |
---|---|
Former county constituency for the House of Commons | |
County | Kent |
1832–1885 | |
Seats | 2 |
Created from | Kent |
Replaced by | Medway Sevenoaks Ashford Dartford Lewisham |
West Kent (formally known as "Kent, Western") was a county constituency in Kent in South East England. It returned two Members of Parliament (MPs) to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, elected by the first past the post system.
The constituency was created by the Reform Act 1832 for the 1832 general election, and abolished by the Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 for the 1885 general election.
All three two-member constituencies in Kent were abolished in 1885: East Kent, Mid Kent and West Kent. They were replaced by eight new single-member constituencies: Ashford, Dartford, Faversham, Isle of Thanet, Medway, St Augustine's, Sevenoaks and Tunbridge.
1832–1868: The Lathes of Sutton-at-Hone and Aylesford, and the Lower Division of the Lathe of Scray. [1]
1868–1885: The Lathe of Sutton-at-Hone. [2]
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Whig | Thomas Law Hodges | 3,364 | 37.5 | ||
Whig | Thomas Rider | 3,100 | 34.5 | ||
Tory | William Geary | 2,518 | 28.0 | ||
Majority | 582 | 6.5 | |||
Turnout | 5,562 | 83.3 | |||
Registered electors | 6,678 | ||||
Whig win (new seat) | |||||
Whig win (new seat) |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Geary | 2,558 | 38.4 | +10.4 | |
Whig | Thomas Law Hodges | 2,092 | 31.4 | −6.1 | |
Whig | Thomas Rider | 2,007 | 30.1 | −4.4 | |
Turnout | 4,549 | 66.4 | −16.9 | ||
Registered electors | 6,850 | ||||
Majority | 551 | 8.3 | N/A | ||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +10.5 | |||
Majority | 85 | 1.3 | −5.2 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −5.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Geary | 3,584 | 35.3 | +16.1 | |
Whig | Thomas Law Hodges | 3,334 | 32.9 | −28.6 | |
Conservative | Edmund Filmer | 3,229 | 31.8 | +12.6 | |
Turnout | 6,641 | 78.8 | +12.4 | ||
Registered electors | 8,432 | ||||
Majority | 250 | 2.4 | −5.9 | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | +15.2 | |||
Majority | 105 | 1.1 | −0.2 | ||
Whig hold | Swing | −28.7 |
Geary resigned, causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmund Filmer | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmund Filmer | Unopposed | |||
Conservative | Charles Marsham | Unopposed | |||
Registered electors | 9,089 | ||||
Conservative hold | |||||
Conservative gain from Whig |
Marsham succeeded to the peerage, becoming 3rd Earl of Romney and causing a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Thomas Austen | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmund Filmer | 3,219 | 34.1 | N/A | |
Whig | Thomas Law Hodges | 3,127 | 33.2 | New | |
Conservative | Thomas Austen | 3,082 | 32.7 | N/A | |
Turnout | 6,278 (est) | 66.2 (est) | N/A | ||
Registered electors | 9,489 | ||||
Majority | 92 | 0.9 | N/A | ||
Conservative hold | Swing | N/A | |||
Majority | 45 | 0.5 | N/A | ||
Whig gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Edmund Filmer | 3,247 | 35.7 | +1.6 | |
Conservative | William Masters Smith | 3,193 | 35.1 | +2.4 | |
Whig | Thomas Law Hodges | 2,652 | 29.2 | −4.0 | |
Majority | 595 | 6.5 | +5.6 | ||
Majority | 541 | 5.9 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 5,872 (est) | 62.6 (est) | −3.6 | ||
Registered electors | 9,379 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +1.6 | |||
Conservative gain from Whig | Swing | +1.5 |
Filmer's death caused a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peelite | Charles Wykeham Martin | 3,557 | 53.0 | N/A | |
Conservative | Sir Walter Buchanan Riddell, 10th Baronet | 3,149 | 47.0 | −23.8 | |
Majority | 408 | 6.0 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 6,706 | 74.9 | +12.3 | ||
Registered electors | 8,949 | ||||
Peelite gain from Conservative | Swing |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peelite | Charles Wykeham Martin | 3,896 | 36.6 | N/A | |
Radical | James Whatman | 3,578 | 33.6 | +4.4 | |
Conservative | William Masters Smith | 3,171 | 29.8 | −41.0 | |
Turnout | 5,323 (est) | 59.5 (est) | −3.1 | ||
Registered electors | 8,949 | ||||
Majority | 725 | 6.8 | N/A | ||
Peelite gain from Conservative | Swing | N/A | |||
Majority | 407 | 3.8 | N/A | ||
Radical gain from Conservative | Swing | +12.5 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Amherst | 3,769 | 26.0 | +11.1 | |
Conservative | Edmund Filmer | 3,684 | 25.4 | +10.5 | |
Liberal | Charles Wykeham Martin | 3,584 | 24.7 | −11.9 | |
Liberal | James Whatman | 3,460 | 23.9 | −9.7 | |
Majority | 309 | 2.1 | N/A | ||
Majority | 100 | 0.7 | N/A | ||
Turnout | 7,249 (est) | 81.0 (est) | +21.5 | ||
Registered electors | 8,949 | ||||
Conservative gain from Peelite | Swing | +11.0 | |||
Conservative gain from Liberal | Swing | +10.7 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Amherst | 4,133 | 25.9 | −0.1 | |
Conservative | William Hart Dyke | 4,054 | 25.4 | 0.0 | |
Liberal | John Lubbock | 3,896 | 24.4 | −0.3 | |
Liberal | William Angerstein [14] | 3,861 | 24.2 | +0.3 | |
Majority | 158 | 1.0 | +0.3 | ||
Turnout | 7,972 (est) | 81.3 (est) | +0.3 | ||
Registered electors | 9,811 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −0.1 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +0.0 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Mills | 3,440 | 25.8 | −0.1 | |
Conservative | John Gilbert Talbot | 3,378 | 25.3 | −0.1 | |
Liberal | John Lubbock | 3,323 | 24.9 | +0.5 | |
Liberal | William Angerstein [14] | 3,196 | 24.0 | −0.2 | |
Majority | 55 | 0.4 | −0.6 | ||
Turnout | 6,669 (est) | 75.5 (est) | −5.8 | ||
Registered electors | 8,828 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | −0.3 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +0.1 |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Mills | 5,295 | 30.7 | +4.9 | |
Conservative | John Gilbert Talbot | 5,227 | 30.3 | +5.0 | |
Liberal | Archibald Hamilton | 3,391 | 19.6 | −5.3 | |
Liberal | Edward Marjoribanks | 3,346 | 19.4 | −4.6 | |
Majority | 1,836 | 10.6 | +10.2 | ||
Turnout | 8,630 (est) | 72.1 (est) | −3.4 | ||
Registered electors | 11,973 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +5.1 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +4.8 |
Talbot resigned in order to contest the 1878 Oxford University by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Legge | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | Charles Mills | 6,413 | 35.2 | +4.5 | |
Conservative | William Legge | 5,986 | 32.8 | +2.5 | |
Liberal | Henry Mason Bompas [16] | 4,857 | 26.6 | −12.4 | |
Conservative Tenant Farmers | John May [17] | 977 | 5.4 | New | |
Majority | 1,129 | 6.2 | −4.4 | ||
Turnout | 11,270 (est) | 75.8 (est) | +3.7 | ||
Registered electors | 14,873 | ||||
Conservative hold | Swing | +5.4 | |||
Conservative hold | Swing | +4.4 |
Legge was appointed Vice-Chamberlain of the Household, requiring a by-election.
Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conservative | William Legge | Unopposed | |||
Conservative hold |