Seat belt laws in the United States

Last updated
Seat belt laws for front seat passengers in the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and the 5 inhabited U.S. territories.
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
No enforcement for adults (primary enforcement for minors)
Secondary enforcement
Secondary enforcement; primary under certain ages
Primary enforcement US seat belt laws.svg
Seat belt laws for front seat passengers in the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and the 5 inhabited U.S. territories.
  No enforcement for adults (primary enforcement for minors)
  Secondary enforcement
  Secondary enforcement; primary under certain ages
  Primary enforcement

Most seat belt laws in the United States are left to state law. However, the recommended age for a child to sit in the front passenger seat is 13. The first seat belt law was a federal law, Title 49 of the United States Code, Chapter 301, Motor Safety Standard, which took effect on January 1, 1968, that required all vehicles (except buses) to be fitted with seat belts in all designated seating positions. [1] This law has since been modified to require three-point seat belts in outboard-seating positions, and finally three-point seat belts in all seating positions. [2] Seat belt use was voluntary until New York became the first state to require vehicle occupants to wear seat belts, as of December 1,1984. New Hampshire is the only state with no law requiring adults to wear seat belts in a vehicle. [3]

Contents

Primary and secondary enforcement

U.S. seat belt use laws may be subject to primary enforcement or secondary enforcement. Primary enforcement allows a law enforcement officer to stop and ticket a driver if they observe a violation. Secondary enforcement means that a peace officer may only stop or cite a driver for a seat belt violation if the driver committed another primary violation (such as speeding, running a stop sign, etc.) at the same time. New Hampshire is the only U.S. state that does not by law require adult drivers to wear safety belts while operating a motor vehicle.

In 15 of the 50 states, non-use of seat belts is considered a secondary offense, which means that a police officer cannot stop and ticket a driver for the sole offense of not wearing a seat belt. (One exception to this is Colorado, where children not properly restrained is a primary offense and brings a much larger fine.) If a driver commits a primary violation (e.g., for speeding) they may additionally be charged for not wearing a seat belt. In most states, seat belt non-use was originally a secondary offense. Many states later changed it to a primary offense, the first being California in 1993. Of the 34 states with primary seat belt use laws, all but California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, and Washington originally had only secondary enforcement laws.

Thirty-four states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands have primary enforcement laws for front seats. [3] [4]

Laws by state and territory

This table summarizes seat belt use laws in the United States. [3] [5]

Seat belt use laws often do not themselves apply to children. Even so, all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and all five inhabited U.S. territories have separate child restraint laws. [note 1] The table shows only the base fine, but not applicable add-on fees in many areas, such as the head injury fund and court security fees, which can increase the total assessed fine by up to a factor of five. These are also "first offense" fines, and subsequent offenses may be much higher.[ citation needed ]

Twenty-three states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands had seat belt usage of 90% or higher in 2017. [7]

State,
federal district,
or territory
Type of lawDate of first lawWho is coveredBase fine before feesSeat Belt
Usage
(2017)
[7] [note 2]
Flag of Alabama.svg  Alabama Primary EnforcementJuly 18, 1991All ages in all seats [8] $2592.9%
Flag of Alaska.svg  Alaska Primary EnforcementSeptember 12, 1990All ages in all seats$15 ($25 actual)90.1%
Flag of American Samoa.svg  American Samoa Primary Enforcement [4] All ages in front seats [9] $25 [9] 84.9%
Flag of Arizona.svg  Arizona Secondary Enforcement1January 1, 1991All ages in front seats; Under age 16 in all seats$10 ($37.20 actual)86.1%
Flag of Arkansas.svg  Arkansas Primary EnforcementJuly 15, 1991All ages in front seats; Under age 16 in all seats$2581.0%
Flag of California.svg  California Primary EnforcementJanuary 1, 1986All ages in all seats [10] [11] $20 ($162 actual); $50 second offense ($190 actual)696.2%
Flag of Colorado.svg  Colorado Secondary Enforcement2
Exception Mountain View where it is a primary violation [12]
July 1, 1987All ages in front seats; Under age 18 in all seats$7183.8%
Flag of Connecticut.svg  Connecticut Primary EnforcementJanuary 1, 1986All ages in all seats$9290.3%
Flag of Delaware.svg  Delaware Primary EnforcementJanuary 1, 1992All ages in all seats$2591.4%
Flag of Washington, D.C.svg  District of Columbia Primary EnforcementDecember 12, 1985All ages in all seats$50493.6%
Flag of Florida.svg  Florida Primary EnforcementJuly 1, 1986All ages in front seats; Under age 18 in all seats$30 ($116 actual)90.2%
Flag of Georgia (U.S. state).svg Georgia Primary EnforcementJuly 1, 1996 [13] All ages in front seats; Under age 18 in all seats$1597.1%
Flag of Guam.svg  Guam Primary EnforcementAll ages in all seats$10091.0%
Flag of Hawaii.svg  Hawaii Primary EnforcementDecember 16, 1985All ages in all seats$45 ($112 actual)96.9%
Flag of Idaho.svg  Idaho Secondary Enforcement3July 1, 1986All ages in all seats$10 ($51.50 actual)81.2%
Flag of Illinois.svg  Illinois Primary EnforcementJanuary 1, 1988All ages in all seats$164 minimum fine93.8%
Flag of Indiana.svg  Indiana Primary EnforcementJuly 1, 1987All ages in all seats$2593.0%
Flag of Iowa.svg  Iowa Primary EnforcementJuly 1, 1986All ages in front seats; Under 18 in rear seats [14] $25 ($127.50 actual)91.4%
Flag of Kansas.svg  Kansas Primary Enforcement4July 1, 1986Age 14+ in all seats$60 for age 14-17; $10 for 18+82.0%
Flag of Kentucky.svg  Kentucky Primary EnforcementJuly 15, 1994Age 7 and younger and over 57 in (140 cm) in all seats; 8+ in all seats$2586.8%
Flag of Louisiana.svg  Louisiana Primary EnforcementJuly 1, 1986Age 13+ in front seats$2587.1%
Flag of Maine.svg  Maine Primary EnforcementDecember 26, 1995Age 18+ in all seats$5088.9%
Flag of Maryland.svg  Maryland Primary Enforcement4July 1, 1986Age 16+ in all seats$8392.1%
Flag of Massachusetts.svg  Massachusetts Secondary EnforcementFebruary 1, 1994Age 13+ in all seats [15] [16] $2573.7%
Flag of Michigan.svg  Michigan Primary EnforcementJuly 1, 1985Age 16+ in front seats, under 16 in rear seats$25 ($65 actual)94.1%
Flag of Minnesota.svg  Minnesota Primary EnforcementAugust 1, 19867 and younger and over 57 in (140 cm) in all seats; 8+ in all seats$25 +$75 fee92.0%
Flag of Mississippi.svg  Mississippi Primary EnforcementJuly 1, 1994Age 7+ in all seats$2578.8%
Flag of Missouri.svg  Missouri Secondary Enforcement2September 28, 1985Age 16+ in front seats;

Age 8-15 in all seats

$10 for age 16+; $50 for age 8-1584.0%
Flag of Montana.svg  Montana Secondary EnforcementOctober 1, 1987Age 6+ in all seats$2078.0%
Flag of Nebraska.svg  Nebraska Secondary EnforcementJanuary 1, 1993Age 18+ in front seats$2585.9%
Flag of Nevada.svg  Nevada Secondary EnforcementJuly 1, 1987Age 6+ in all seats$2590.6%
Flag of New Hampshire.svg  New Hampshire None for adults, primary for minors onlyAugust 18, 1997 [17] Age 17 and under in all seats$5067.6%
Flag of New Jersey.svg  New Jersey Primary Enforcement4March 1, 1985Age 8+ in all seats$46 per person94.1%
Flag of New Mexico.svg  New Mexico Primary EnforcementJanuary 1, 1986Age 18+ in all seats$25491.5%
Flag of New York.svg  New York Primary EnforcementDecember 1, 1984All ages in all seats$50 ($135 actual after surcharges) [18] 93.4%
Flag of North Carolina.svg  North Carolina Primary Enforcement, Secondary for back seat [19] October 1, 1985All ages in all seats$180 for front seat; $10 for rear seat; $266 for the driver if a passenger is under 16 [20] 91.4%
Flag of North Dakota.svg  North Dakota Secondary Enforcement3July 14, 1994Age 18+ in front seats; Age under 18 in all seats$20 for age 18+; $25 + 1 point on license for under 18479.3%
Flag of the Northern Mariana Islands.svg  Northern Mariana Islands Primary EnforcementRiders 6+ in age, in all seats$2592.2%
Flag of Ohio.svg  Ohio Secondary EnforcementMay 6, 1986Age 15+ in front seat;

Age 8–14 in all seats

$30 for driver; $20 for passenger82.8%
Flag of Oklahoma.svg  Oklahoma Primary EnforcementFebruary 1, 1987Age 13+ in front seats$2086.9%
Flag of Oregon.svg  Oregon Primary EnforcementDecember 7, 1990All ages in all seats$13096.8%
Flag of Pennsylvania.svg  Pennsylvania Secondary Enforcement3November 23, 1987Age 18+ in front seats;

Age 8-17 in all seats

$1085.6%
Flag of Puerto Rico.svg  Puerto Rico Primary EnforcementAge 9+ or 57 inches and over; Seating unspecified$5087.9%
Flag of Rhode Island.svg  Rhode Island Primary EnforcementJune 18, 1991Age 8+ in all seats$7588.3%
Flag of South Carolina.svg  South Carolina Primary EnforcementJuly 1, 1989Age 6+ in all seats$2592.3%
Flag of South Dakota.svg  South Dakota Secondary EnforcementJanuary 1, 1995Age 18+ in front seats$2574.8%
Flag of Tennessee.svg  Tennessee Primary EnforcementApril 21, 1986Age 16+ in front seats$2588.5%
Flag of Texas.svg  Texas Primary EnforcementSeptember 1, 1985Age 7 years and younger and 57 inches or taller in all seats; Age 8+ years in all seats$200 if under 17 (driver); $50 if 15+ (driver or passenger)91.9%
Flag of Utah.svg  Utah Primary EnforcementApril 28, 1986All ages in all seats$4588.8%
Flag of Vermont.svg  Vermont Secondary Enforcement3January 1, 1994All ages in all seats$2584.5%
Flag of the United States Virgin Islands.svg Virgin Islands (U.S.) Primary EnforcementAll ages in front seats$25 – $25079.1%
Flag of Virginia.svg  Virginia Secondary Enforcement3January 1, 1988All drivers; age 18+ in front seats; under 18 in all seats$2585.3%
Flag of Wake Island.svg Wake Island Primary Enforcement [6] April 10, 2002 [6] All ages [6]  ?No data
Flag of Washington.svg Washington Primary EnforcementJune 11, 1986Age 8+ in all seats$12494.8%
Flag of West Virginia.svg  West Virginia Primary EnforcementSeptember 1, 1993All ages in front seats; 8–17 in rear seats$2589.7%
Flag of Wisconsin.svg  Wisconsin Primary EnforcementDecember 1, 1987Age 8+ in all seats$1089.4%
Flag of Wyoming.svg  Wyoming Secondary EnforcementJune 8, 1989Age 9+ in all seats$25 for driver;

$10 for passenger

84.8%

Note: As of 2017, aggregate seat belt usage in road vehicles in the entire United States is 89.7%. [7]

1 Arizona's law is Primary for under the age of 5.

2 Colorado and Missouri's law is Secondary for adults but Primary for those under the age of 16.

3 Idaho, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Vermont and Virginia's law is Secondary for adults but Primary for under 18.

4 Kansas, Maryland, and New Jersey, law is Secondary Enforcement for rear seat occupants (18+ in Kansas).
5 These states assess points on one's driving record for the seat belt violation.
6 In California, an additional penalty of $29 shall be levied upon every $10 or fraction thereof, of every fine, penalty, or forfeiture imposed by and collected by the court for criminal offenses, including all traffic offenses, except parking offenses as defined in subdivision (i) of Penal Code § 1463. The additional penalty is calculated as follows: $10 state penalty required by PC 1464, $7 county penalty required by GC 76000(e), $5 court facilities construction penalty required by GC 70372(a), $5 DNA Identification Fund penalty required by GC 76104.6 and 76104.7, $2 emergency medical services penalty required by GC 76000.5. Separately, Penal Code § 1465.8 requires an imposition of an additional fee of $40 for court security on every conviction for a criminal offense, including a traffic offense, except parking offenses as defined in Penal Code § 1463. Additionally, GC 70373 requires a $35 criminal facilities conviction assessment.

Damages reduction

A person involved in a car accident who was not using a seat belt may be liable for damages far greater than if they had been using a seat belt. However, when in court, most states protect motorists from having their damages reduced in a lawsuit due to the non-use of a seat belt, even if they were acting in violation of the law by not wearing the seat belt.[ clarification needed ] Currently, damages may be reduced for the non-use of a seat belt in 16 states: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida (See F.S.A. 316.614(10)), Iowa, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. [21]

Effectiveness

Seat belt laws are effective in reducing car crash deaths. [22] One study found that mandatory-seatbelt laws reduced traffic fatalities in youths by 8% and serious traffic-related injuries by 9%, respectively. [23] Primary-seatbelt laws seem to be more effective at reducing crash deaths than secondary laws. [24] [25]

See also

Notes

  1. One territory in the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands (Wake Island) requires all occupants of vehicles to wear seat belts. [6]
  2. 2016 rate for the Virgin Islands.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seat belt</span> Vehicle safety device to protect against injury during collisions and sudden stop

A seat belt, also known as a safety belt or spelled seatbelt, is a vehicle safety device designed to secure the driver or a passenger of a vehicle against harmful movement that may result during a collision or a sudden stop. A seat belt reduces the likelihood of death or serious injury in a traffic collision by reducing the force of secondary impacts with interior strike hazards, by keeping occupants positioned correctly for maximum effectiveness of the airbag, and by preventing occupants being ejected from the vehicle in a crash or if the vehicle rolls over.

Drunk driving is the act of operating a motor vehicle with the operator's ability to do so impaired as a result of alcohol consumption, or with a blood alcohol level in excess of the legal limit. For drivers 21 years or older, driving with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher is illegal. For drivers under 21 years old, the legal limit is lower, with state limits ranging from 0.00 to 0.02. Lower BAC limits apply when operating boats, airplanes, or commercial vehicles. Among other names, the criminal offense of drunk driving may be called driving under the influence (DUI), driving while intoxicated or impaired (DWI), operating [a] vehicle under the influence of alcohol (OVI), or operating while impaired (OWI).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crumple zone</span> Structural feature used in vehicles

Crumple zones, crush zones, or crash zones are a structural safety feature used in vehicles, mainly in automobiles, to increase the time over which a change in velocity occurs from the impact during a collision by a controlled deformation; in recent years, it is also incorporated into trains and railcars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Automotive safety</span> Study and practice to minimize the occurrence and consequences of motor vehicle accidents

Automotive safety is the study and practice of automotive design, construction, equipment and regulation to minimize the occurrence and consequences of traffic collisions involving motor vehicles. Road traffic safety more broadly includes roadway design.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">School bus</span> Bus operated by a school or school district for student transport

A school bus is any type of bus owned, leased, contracted to, or operated by a school or school district. It is regularly used to transport students to and from school or school-related activities, but not including a charter bus or transit bus. Various configurations of school buses are used worldwide; the most iconic examples are the yellow school buses of the United States which are also found in other parts of the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Click It or Ticket</span> Safety belt awareness slogan

Click It or Ticket is a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration campaign aimed at increasing the use of seat belts among young people in the United States. The campaign relies heavily on targeted advertising aimed at teens and young adults.

Seat belt legislation requires the fitting of seat belts to motor vehicles and the wearing of seat belts by motor vehicle occupants to be mandatory. Laws requiring the fitting of seat belts to cars have in some cases been followed by laws mandating their use, with the effect that thousands of deaths on the road have been prevented. Different laws apply in different countries to the wearing of seat belts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Traffic stop</span> Detention of a driver by police

A traffic stop, colloquially referred to as being pulled over, is a temporary detention of a driver of a vehicle and its occupants by police to investigate a possible crime or minor violation of law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act</span> United States federal law

The National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act was enacted in the United States in 1966 to empower the federal government to set and administer new safety standards for motor vehicles and road traffic safety. The Act was the first mandatory federal safety standards for motor vehicles. The Act created the National Highway Safety Bureau. The Act was one of a number of initiatives by the government in response to increasing number of cars and associated fatalities and injuries on the road following a period when the number of people killed on the road had increased 6-fold and the number of vehicles was up 11-fold since 1925. The reduction of the rate of death attributable to motor-vehicle crashes in the United States represents the successful public health response to a great technologic advance of the 20th century—the motorization of the United States.

Atwater v. Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that a person's Fourth Amendment rights are not violated when the subject is arrested for driving without a seatbelt. The court ruled that such an arrest for a misdemeanor that is punishable only by a fine does not constitute an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment.

For driving in the United States, each state and territory has its own traffic code or rules of the road, although most of the rules of the road are similar for the purpose of uniformity, given that all states grant reciprocal driving privileges to each other's licensed drivers. There is also a "Uniform Vehicle Code" which was proposed by a private, non-profit group, based upon input by its members. The UVC was not adopted in its entirety by any state. As with uniform acts in general, some states adopted selected sections as written or with modifications, while others created their own sui generis statutes touching upon the same subject matter. As required by the federal Highway Safety Act of 1966, all states and territories have adopted substantially similar standards for the vast majority of signs, signals, and road surface markings, based upon the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices from the U.S. Department of Transportation. Many of the standard rules of the road involve consistent interpretation of the standard signs, signals, and markings such as what to do when approaching a stop sign, or the driving requirements imposed by a double yellow line on the street or highway. In order to implement their own traffic laws on the property of their own facilities, several federal agencies have also developed their own traffic laws.

Many countries have adopted a penalty point or demerit point system under which a person’s driving license is revoked or suspended based on the number of points they’ve accumulated over a specific period of time, points are given for traffic offenses or infringements committed by them in that period. The demerit points schemes of each jurisdiction varies. These demerit schemes are usually in addition to fines or other penalties which may be imposed for a particular offence or infringement, or after a prescribed number of points have been accumulated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transportation safety in the United States</span> Overview of transportation safety

Transportation safety in the United States encompasses safety of transportation in the United States, including automobile crashes, airplane crashes, rail crashes, and other mass transit incidents, although the most fatalities are generated by road incidents annually killing 32,479 people in 2011 to over 42,000 people in 2022. The number of deaths per passenger-mile on commercial airlines in the United States between 2000 and 2010 was about 0.2 deaths per 10 billion passenger-miles. For driving, the rate was 150 per 10 billion vehicle-miles: 750 times higher per mile than for flying in a commercial airplane.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Driving in the United States</span>

86 percent of people in the United States use private automobiles as their primary form of transportation to their workplace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Traffic collision</span> Incident when a vehicle collides with another object

A traffic collision, also known as a motor vehicle collision, occurs when a vehicle collides with another vehicle, pedestrian, animal, road debris, or other moving or stationary obstruction, such as a tree, pole or building. Traffic collisions often result in injury, disability, death, and property damage as well as financial costs to both society and the individuals involved. Road transport is statistically the most dangerous situation people deal with on a daily basis, but casualty figures from such incidents attract less media attention than other, less frequent types of tragedy. The commonly used term car accident is increasingly falling out of favor with many government departments and organizations, with the Associated Press style guide recommending caution before using the term. Some collisions are intentional vehicle-ramming attacks, staged crashes, vehicular homicide or vehicular suicide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hit and run</span> Failing to stop after causing or contributing to a traffic collision

In traffic laws, a hit and run or a hit-and-run is the criminal act of causing a traffic collision and not stopping afterwards. It is considered a supplemental crime in most jurisdictions.

Seat belt legislation in Canada is left to the provinces. All provinces in Canada have primary enforcement seat belt laws, which allow a police officer to stop and ticket a driver if they observed a violation. Ontario was the first province to pass a law which required vehicle occupants to wear seat belts, a law that came into effect on January 1, 1976.

Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., 562 U.S. 323 (2011), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, in which the Court unanimously held that Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208, promulgated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, does not federally preempt state tort lawsuits against auto manufacturers from injuries caused by a defective lack of certain types of seat belts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Restrictions on cell phone use while driving in the United States</span> U.S. laws regulating use of electronic mobile devices by motorists

Various laws in the United States regulate the use of mobile phones and other electronics by motorists. Different states take different approaches. Some laws affect only novice drivers or commercial drivers, while some laws affect all drivers. Some laws target handheld devices only, while other laws affect both handheld and handsfree devices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Work-related road safety in the United States</span>

People who are driving as part of their work duties are an important road user category. First, workers themselves are at risk of road traffic injury. Contributing factors include fatigue and long work hours, delivery pressures, distractions from mobile phones and other devices, lack of training to operate the assigned vehicle, vehicle defects, use of prescription and non-prescription medications, medical conditions, and poor journey planning. Death, disability, or injury of a family wage earner due to road traffic injury, in addition to causing emotional pain and suffering, creates economic hardship for the injured worker and family members that may persist well beyond the event itself.

References

  1. US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (January 1, 1968). "Title 49 of the United States Code, Chapter 301, Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208 - Occupant Crash Protection Passenger Cars". Archived from the original on May 29, 2014. Retrieved May 7, 2014.
  2. US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (January 1, 1968). "Title 49 of the United States Code, Chapter 301, Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208 - Occupant Crash Protection Passenger Cars". Archived from the original on May 29, 2014. Retrieved May 7, 2014.
  3. 1 2 3 "State laws by Issue: Seat Belts". Governors highway safety association. 2019. Retrieved 2019-07-03.
  4. 1 2 "A Guide to Seat Belt Laws in the United States". Car laws. 5 April 2015. Retrieved July 3, 2019.
  5. "Safety belt use laws". Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. October 2009. Retrieved 2009-10-30.
  6. 1 2 3 4 "Wake Island Code, 32 CFR Part 935". Federal Register. April 9, 2002. Retrieved 2019-07-03.
  7. 1 2 3 "Traffic Safety Facts: Seat Belt Use in 2017 – Use Rates in the States and Territories (DOT HS 812 546)". U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. June 2018. Retrieved 2019-07-25.
  8. "Alabama changes seat belt law". 27 August 2019.
  9. 1 2 "Title 22 Highways and Motor Vehicles — Chapter 03 Rules of the Road — Section 22.0333 Mandatory use of seat belts". American Samoa Bar Association. 2011. Retrieved July 3, 2019.
  10. "California Driver Handbook - Occupant Protection" . Retrieved 2018-12-20.
  11. "California Highway Patrol Child Passenger Safety Laws and Guidelines" (PDF). Retrieved 2018-12-20.
  12. 9News Jeremy Jojola on Denver Metro Speed Traps. 9News. 8 June 2015. Archived from the original on 2021-12-21.
  13. Cosgrove, L.; Preusser, D.; Preusser, C.; Ulmer, R. (1998). "Evaluation of Primary Safety Belt Laws in California, Louisiana, and Georgia". Annual Proceedings / Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. 42: 261–275. PMC   3400197 .
  14. "Iowa Department of Public Safety | Iowa Department of Public Safety" (PDF). dps.iowa.gov. Retrieved 25 July 2022.
  15. "PartI Title XIV Chapter90 Section 13a". Massachusetts General Laws. 2019. Retrieved September 4, 2019.
  16. "Child passenger restraint law". Massachusetts General Laws. 2019. Retrieved September 4, 2019.
  17. HB 273-FN Final Version, Chapter 244, 1997 Session, New Hampshire. "244:2 New Paragraph; Safety Belt Required for Drivers Under 18. Amend RSA 265:107-a by inserting after paragraph I the following new paragraph: I-a. No person who is less than 18 years of age shall drive a motor vehicle on any way unless such person is wearing a seat or safety belt which is properly adjusted and fastened." Retrieved on 2020-01-25 from http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/1997/HB0273.html.
  18. "vehicle and traffic state mandated surcharges $85 for seat belt". Horseheads.org. Retrieved 2011-07-16.
  19. "Court costs and fees chart" (PDF). NCCourts.gov. Retrieved 2018-11-24.
  20. "NCDOT: Click It or Ticket".
  21. "Child restraint/belt use laws". Iihs.org. Retrieved 2011-07-16.
  22. Cohen, Alma; Einav, Liran (November 2003). "The Effects of Mandatory Seat Belt Laws on Driving Behavior and Traffic Fatalities" (PDF). Review of Economics and Statistics. 85 (4): 828–843. doi:10.1162/003465303772815754. S2CID   7309959.
  23. Carpenter, Christopher S.; Stehr, Mark (May 2008). "The effects of mandatory seatbelt laws on seatbelt use, motor vehicle fatalities, and crash-related injuries among youths" (PDF). Journal of Health Economics. 27 (3): 642–662. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.09.010. PMID   18242744.
  24. Lee, Lois K.; Monuteaux, Michael C.; Burghardt, Lindsey C.; Fleegler, Eric W.; Nigrovic, Lise E.; Meehan, William P.; Schutzman, Sara A.; Mannix, Rebekah (4 August 2015). "Motor Vehicle Crash Fatalities in States With Primary Versus Secondary Seat Belt Laws". Annals of Internal Medicine. 163 (3): 184–90. doi:10.7326/M14-2368. PMID   26098590. S2CID   25055702.
  25. Rivara, FrederickP.; Thompson, DianeC.; Cummings, Peter (January 1999). "Effectiveness of primary and secondary enforced seat belt laws". American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 16 (1): 30–39. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00113-5. PMID   9921384.