*Trito

Last updated

*Trito is a significant figure in Proto-Indo-European mythology, representing the first warrior and acting as a culture hero. [1] He is connected to other prominent characters, such as Manu and Yemo, [1] and is recognized as the protagonist of the myth of the warrior function, [1] establishing the model for all later men of arms. [1] In the legend, Trito is offered cattle as a divine gift by celestial gods, [2] which is later stolen by a three-headed serpent named * H₂n̥gʷʰis ('serpent'). [2] [3] [4] Despite initial defeat, Trito, fortified by an intoxicating drink and aided by the Sky-Father, [2] [4] [5] or alternatively the Storm-God or *H₂nḗr, 'Man', [4] [6] together they go to a cave or a mountain, and the hero overcomes the monster and returns the recovered cattle to a priest for it to be properly sacrificed. [2] [4] [5] He is now the first warrior, maintaining through his heroic deeds the cycle of mutual giving between gods and mortals. [1] [4] Scholars have interpreted the story of Trito either as a cosmic conflict between the heavenly hero and the earthly serpent or as an Indo-European victory over non-Indo-European people, with the monster symbolizing the aboriginal thief or usurper. [7] Trito's character served as a model for later cattle-raiding epic myths and was seen as providing moral justification for cattle raiding. [1] The legend of Trito is generally accepted among scholars and is recognized as an essential part of Proto-Indo-European mythology, although not to the level of Manu and Yemo. [8]

Contents

History of research

Following a first paper on the cosmogonical legend of Manu and Yemo, published simultaneously with Jaan Puhvel in 1975 (who pointed out the Roman reflex of the story), Bruce Lincoln assembled the initial part of the myth with the legend of the third man Trito in a single ancestral motif. [9] [4] [10]

Since the 1970s, the reconstructed motifs of Manu and Yemo, and to a lesser extent that of Trito, have been generally accepted among scholars. [8]

Trifunctional hypothesis

According to Lincoln the legend of Trito should be interpreted as "a myth of the warrior function, establishing the model for all later men of arms". [1] While Manu and Yemo seem to be the protagonists of "a myth of the sovereign function, establishing the model for later priests and kings", [1] The myth indeed recalls the Dumézilian tripartition of the cosmos between the priest (in both his magical and legal aspects), the warrior (the Third Man), and the herder (the cow). [4]

The story of Trito served as a model for later cattle raiding epic myths and most likely as a moral justification for the practice of raiding among Indo-European peoples. In the original legend, Trito is only taking back what rightfully belongs to his people, those who sacrifice properly to the gods. [1] The myth has been interpreted either as a cosmic conflict between the heavenly hero and the earthly serpent, or as an Indo-European victory over non-Indo-European people, the monster symbolizing the aboriginal thief or usurper. [7]

Trito and H₂n̥gʷʰis

Cognates stemming from the First Warrior *Trito ('Third') include the Vedic Trita, the hero who recovered the stolen cattle from the serpent Vṛtrá; the Avestan Thraētona ('son of Thrita'), who won back the abducted women from the serpent Aži Dahāka; and the Norse þriði ('Third'), one of the names of Óðinn. [11] [12] [5] Other cognates may appear in the Greek expressions trítos sōtḗr (τρίτος σωτήρ; 'Third Saviour'), an epithet of Zeus, and tritogḗneia (τριτογήνεια; 'Third born' or 'born of Zeus'), an epithet of Athena; and perhaps in the Slavic mythical hero Trojan  [ ru ], found in Russian and Serbian legends alike. [12] [lower-alpha 1]

H₂n̥gʷʰis is a reconstructed noun meaning 'serpent'. [3] [4] Descendent cognates can be found in the Iranian Aži, the name of the inimical serpent, and in the Indic áhi ('serpent'), a term used to designate the monstrous serpent Vṛtrá, [12] both descending from Proto-Indo-Iranian *Háǰʰiš. [14]

Indo-European linguistic descendants (in bold) and thematic echoes (in italic) of the myth of the First Warrior. [15]
TraditionFirst WarriorThree-headed SerpentHelper GodStolen present
Proto-Indo-European*Trito ('Third')*H₂n̥gʷʰis The Storm-god or *H₂nḗr ('Man')Cattle
Indian Trita Vṛtrá ('áhi') Indra Cows
Iranian Thraētona ('son of Thrita') Aži Dahāka *Vr̥traghna Women
Germanic þriði , Hymir Three serpents Þórr Goats (?)
Graeco-Roman Herakles Geryon , Cācus Helios Cattle

Serpent-slaying myth

One common myth found in nearly all Indo-European mythologies is a battle ending with a hero or god slaying a serpent or dragon of some sort. [16] [17] [18] Although the details of the story often vary widely, several features remain remarkably the same in all iterations. The protagonist of the story is usually a thunder-god, or a hero somehow associated with thunder. [19] His enemy the serpent is generally associated with water and depicted as multi-headed, or else "multiple" in some other way. [18] Indo-European myths often describe the creature as a "blocker of waters", and his many heads get eventually smashed up by the thunder-god in an epic battle, releasing torrents of water that had previously been pent up. [20] The original legend may have symbolized the Chaoskampf, a clash between forces of order and chaos. [21] The dragon or serpent loses in every version of the story, although in some mythologies, such as the Norse Ragnarök myth, the hero or the god dies with his enemy during the confrontation. [22] Historian Bruce Lincoln has proposed that the dragon-slaying tale and the creation myth of *Trito killing the serpent *H₂n̥gʷʰis may actually belong to the same original story. [23] [6] Reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European dragon-slaying myth appear in most Indo-European poetic traditions, where the myth has left traces of the formulaic sentence *(h₁e) gʷʰent h₁ógʷʰim, meaning "[he] slew the serpent". [24]

Greek red-figure vase painting depicting Heracles slaying the Lernaean Hydra, c. 375-340 BC. Fragmentary jar with scene of Herakles slaying the Hydra of Lerna, South Italy, 375-340 BC, ceramic - Fitchburg Art Museum - DSC08671 (cropped).JPG
Greek red-figure vase painting depicting Heracles slaying the Lernaean Hydra, c. 375–340 BC.

In Hittite mythology, the storm god Tarhunt slays the giant serpent Illuyanka, [25] as does the Vedic god Indra the multi-headed serpent Vritra, which has been causing a drought by trapping the waters in his mountain lair. [20]

[26] Several variations of the story are also found in Greek mythology. [27] The original motif appears inherited in the legend of Zeus slaying the hundred-headed Typhon, as related by Hesiod in the Theogony , [17] [28] and possibly in the myth of Heracles slaying the nine-headed Lernaean Hydra and in the legend of Apollo slaying the earth-dragon Python. [17] [29] The story of Heracles's theft of the cattle of Geryon is probably also related. [17] Although he is not usually thought of as a storm deity in the conventional sense, Heracles bears many attributes held by other Indo-European storm deities, including physical strength and a knack for violence and gluttony. [17] [30]

The original motif is also reflected in Germanic mythology. [31] The Norse god of thunder Thor slays the giant serpent Jörmungandr, which lived in the waters surrounding the realm of Midgard. [32] [33] In the Völsunga saga , Sigurd slays the dragon Fafnir and, in Beowulf , the eponymous hero slays a different dragon. [34] The depiction of dragons hoarding a treasure (symbolizing the wealth of the community) in Germanic legends may also be a reflex of the original myth of the serpent holding waters. [24]

The Hittite god Tarhunt, followed by his son Sarruma, kills the dragon Illuyanka (Museum of Anatolian Civilizations, Ankara, Turkey). Museum of Anatolian Civilizations082 kopie1jpg.jpg
The Hittite god Tarhunt, followed by his son Sarruma, kills the dragon Illuyanka (Museum of Anatolian Civilizations, Ankara, Turkey).

In Zoroastrianism and in Persian mythology, Fereydun (and later Garshasp) slays the serpent Zahhak. In Albanian mythology, the drangue, semi-human divine figures associated with thunders, slay the kulshedra, huge multi-headed fire-spitting serpents associated with water and storms. The Slavic god of storms Perun slays his enemy the dragon-god Veles, as does the bogatyr hero Dobrynya Nikitich to the three-headed dragon Zmey. [32] A similar execution is performed by the Armenian god of thunders Vahagn to the dragon Vishap, [35] by the Romanian knight hero Făt-Frumos to the fire-spitting monster Zmeu, and by the Celtic god of healing Dian Cecht to the serpent Meichi. [21]

In Shinto, where Indo-European influences through Vedic religion can be seen in mythology, the storm god Susanoo slays the eight-headed serpent Yamata no Orochi. [36]

Bird (Christ) victorious over the Serpent (Satan), Saint-Sever Beatus, 11th C. L-oiseau-victorieux-du-serpent medium.jpg
Bird (Christ) victorious over the Serpent (Satan), Saint-Sever Beatus, 11th C.

The Genesis narrative of Judaism and Christianity, as well as the dragon appearing in Revelation 12 can be interpreted[ by whom? ] as a retelling of the serpent-slaying myth. The Deep or Abyss from or on top of which God is said to make the world is translated from the Biblical Hebrew Tehom (Hebrew: תְּהוֹם). Tehom is a cognate of the Akkadian word tamtu and Ugaritic t-h-m which have similar meaning. As such it was equated with the earlier Babylonian serpent Tiamat. [37]

Folklorist Andrew Lang suggests that the serpent-slaying myth morphed into a folktale motif of a frog or toad blocking the flow of waters. [38]

See also

Notes

  1. Troyan has been tentatively connected to numeral "try" 'three', Ukrainian troian 'father of triplets/three sons', or considered a possible guardian deity of Russia in pre-Christian times. [13]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dragon</span> Legendary large magical creature

A dragon is a magical legendary creature that appears in the folklore of multiple cultures worldwide. Beliefs about dragons vary considerably through regions, but dragons in Western cultures since the High Middle Ages have often been depicted as winged, horned, and capable of breathing fire. Dragons in eastern cultures are usually depicted as wingless, four-legged, serpentine creatures with above-average intelligence. Commonalities between dragons' traits are often a hybridization of feline, reptilian, mammalian, and avian features. Some scholars believe large extinct or migrating crocodiles bear the closest resemblance, especially when encountered in forested or swampy areas, and are most likely the template of modern Asian dragon imagery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Garmr</span> Wolf or dog described as a guardian of Hels gate.

In Norse mythology, Garmr or Garm is a wolf or dog associated with both Hel and Ragnarök, and described as a blood-stained guardian of Hel's gate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yamata no Orochi</span> Japanese dragon

Yamata no Orochi, or simply Orochi (大蛇), is a legendary eight-headed and eight-tailed Japanese dragon/serpent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proto-Indo-European mythology</span>

Proto-Indo-European mythology is the body of myths and deities associated with the Proto-Indo-Europeans, speakers of the hypothesized Proto-Indo-European language. Although the mythological motifs are not directly attested – since Proto-Indo-European speakers lived in preliterate societies – scholars of comparative mythology have reconstructed details from inherited similarities found among Indo-European languages, based on the assumption that parts of the Proto-Indo-Europeans' original belief systems survived in the daughter traditions.

Proto-Indo-European society is the reconstructed culture of Proto-Indo-Europeans, the ancient speakers of the Proto-Indo-European language, ancestor of all modern Indo-European languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trifunctional hypothesis</span> Hypothesis about proto-Indo-European society

The trifunctional hypothesis of prehistoric Proto-Indo-European society postulates a tripartite ideology reflected in the existence of three classes or castes—priests, warriors, and commoners —corresponding to the three functions of the sacral, the martial and the economic, respectively. The trifunctional thesis is primarily associated with the French mythographer Georges Dumézil, who proposed it in 1929 in the book Flamen-Brahman, and later in Mitra-Varuna.

Comparative mythology is the comparison of myths from different cultures in an attempt to identify shared themes and characteristics. Comparative mythology has served a variety of academic purposes. For example, scholars have used the relationships between different myths to trace the development of religions and cultures, to propose common origins for myths from different cultures, and to support various psychoanalytical theories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armenian mythology</span>

Armenian mythology originated in ancient Indo-European traditions, specifically Proto-Armenian, and gradually incorporated Hurro-Urartian, Mesopotamian, Iranian, and Greek beliefs and deities.

*Perkʷūnos is the reconstructed name of the weather god in Proto-Indo-European mythology. The deity was connected with fructifying rains, and his name was probably invoked in times of drought. In a widespread Indo-European myth, the thunder-deity fights a multi-headed water-serpent during an epic battle in order to release torrents of water that had previously been pent up. The name of his weapon, *mel-d-(n)-, which denoted both "lightning" and "hammer", can be reconstructed from the attested traditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divine twins</span> Proto-Indo-European mytheme

The Divine Twins are youthful horsemen, either gods or demigods, who serve as rescuers and healers in Proto-Indo-European mythology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Horse sacrifice</span> Type of animal sacrifice

Horse sacrifice is the ritual killing and offering of a horse, usually as part of a religious or cultural ritual. Horse sacrifices were common throughout Eurasia with the domestication of the horse and continuing up until the spread of Abrahamic religions, or in some places like Mongolia, of Buddhism. The practice is rarely observed in some cultures even today.

In historical Indo-European religion, the concept of an otherworld, also known as an otherside, is reconstructed in comparative mythology. Its name is a calque of orbis alius, a term used by Lucan in his description of the Celtic Otherworld.

The Indo-European cosmogony refers to the creation myth of the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European mythology.

*Manu and *Yemo were a duo in Proto-Indo-European mythology. In the creation myth, Manu kills Yemo as a foundational part of the origin of the universe. Yemo is sometimes also interpreted as a primordial hermaphrodite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mitra-Varuna (Indo-European)</span> Proto-Indo-European divine dyad

Mitra-Varuna is a proposed deity or dyad of deities suggested to have existed in Proto-Indo-European religion and mythology. First proposed by Georges Dumézil, he considered it to have been composed of two distinct elements – Mitra and Varuna – this divine pair represented different aspects of sovereignty, with Mitra embodying reason, order, and benevolence, and Varuna symbolizing violence, darkness, and inspiration.

*H₂epom Nepōts is a reconstructed Proto-Indo-European deity who dwells in waters, and whose powers must be ritually gained or controlled by a hero who is the only one able to approach it. The motif may come from swamp gas rising from swamps and igniting. It may come from the high levels of natural gas in Ukraine, the possible Proto-Indo-European homeland.

<i>*Seh₂ul</i> and <i>*Meh₁not</i> Proto-Indo-European Sun and Moon gods

*Seh₂ul and *Meh₁not are the reconstructed Proto-Indo-European goddess of the Sun and god of the Moon. *Seh₂ul is reconstructed based on the solar deities of the attested Indo-European mythologies, although its gender is disputed, since there are deities of both genders. Likewise, *Meh₁not- is reconstructed based on the lunar deities of the daughter languages, but they differ in regards to their gender.

*Péh₂usōn ("Protector") was a proposed Proto-Indo-European pastoral god guarding roads and herds.

*Ḱérberos is the reconstructed name of the canine creature guarding the entrance to the Otherworld in Proto-Indo-European mythology. In a recurrent motif, the Otherworld contains a gate, generally guarded by a dog who could also serve as a guide and ensured that the ones who entered could not get out.

*H₂n̥gʷʰis is a reconstructed Proto-Indo-European term meaning 'serpent', as well as a possible name for a mythological entity, polycephalous sea serpent or dragon which was slain by a hero named Trito with the help of the god Perkʷunos.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Lincoln 1976, pp. 63–64.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Lincoln 1976, p. 58.
  3. 1 2 Lincoln 1976, p. 51.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Anthony 2007, pp. 134–135.
  5. 1 2 3 Mallory & Adams 1997, p. 138.
  6. 1 2 Mallory & Adams 2006, p. 437.
  7. 1 2 Lincoln 1976, pp. 58, 62.
  8. 1 2 See: Puhvel 1987 , pp. 285–287; Mallory & Adams 2006 , pp. 435–436; Anthony 2007 , pp. 134–135. West 2007 agrees with the reconstructed motif of Manu and Yemo, although he notes that interpretations of the myths of Trita and Thraētona are debated. According to Polomé 1986, "some elements of the [Scandinavian myth of Ymir] are distinctively Indo-Europeans", but the reconstruction of the creation myth of the first Man and his Twin proposed by Lincoln 1975 "makes too unprovable assumptions to account for the fundamental changes implied by the Scandinavian version".
  9. Lincoln 1976, pp. 42–43.
  10. Mallory & Adams 2006, pp. 435–436.
  11. Lincoln 1976, pp. 47–48.
  12. 1 2 3 West 2007, p. 260.
  13. Bilaniuk, Petro B. T. (December 1988). "The Ultimate Reality and Meaning in the Pre-Christian Religion of the Eastern Slavs". Ultimate Reality and Meaning. 11 (4): 254, 258–259. doi: 10.3138/uram.11.4.247 .
  14. Witzel, Michael (2008). "Slaying the Dragon across Eurasia". In Bengtson, John D. (ed.). In Hot Pursuit of Language in Prehistory, Essays in the Four Fields of Anthropology. John Benjamins Publishing. p. 269. ISBN   9789027232526.
  15. See: Lincoln 1976; Mallory & Adams 2006; West 2007; Anthony 2007.
  16. Watkins 1995, pp. 297–301.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 West 2007, pp. 255–259.
  18. 1 2 Mallory & Adams 2006, pp. 436–437.
  19. West 2007, pp. 255.
  20. 1 2 West 2007, pp. 255–257.
  21. 1 2 Watkins 1995, pp. 299–300.
  22. Watkins 1995, pp. 324–330.
  23. Lincoln 1976, p. 76.
  24. 1 2 Fortson 2004, p. 26.
  25. Houwink Ten Cate, Philo H. J. (1961). The Luwian Population Groups of Lycia and Cilicia Aspera During the Hellenistic Period. Brill. pp. 203–220. ISBN   978-9004004696.
  26. Fortson 2004, p. 26–27.
  27. West 2007, p. 460.
  28. Watkins 1995, pp. 448–460.
  29. Watkins 1995, pp. 460–464.
  30. Watkins 1995, pp. 374–383.
  31. Watkins 1995, pp. 414–441.
  32. 1 2 West 2007, p. 259.
  33. Watkins 1995, pp. 429–441.
  34. Orchard, Andy (2003). A Critical Companion to Beowulf. Boydell & Brewer Ltd. p. 108. ISBN   9781843840299.
  35. Kurkjian 1958.
  36. Witzel 2012.
  37. Heinrich Zimmern, The Ancient East, No. III: The Babylonian and Hebrew Genesis ; translated by J. Hutchison; London: David Nutt, 57–59 Long Acre, 1901.
  38. Lang, Andrew. Myth, Ritual and Religion. Vol. I. London: Longmans, Green. 1906. pp. 42-46.

Bibliography