Abortion in Malaysia

Last updated

The laws pertaining to abortion in Malaysia are generally ambiguous and specific legislation varies greatly by state. Access to abortion in Malaysia has been hampered by religious, cultural and social stigmas against abortion, poor awareness of abortion legislation among health professionals [1] and the high cost of abortion services in the private health sector. [2] [3] [4] As a result, risky unsafe abortions are prevalent in Malaysia. Under Sections 312–316 of the Penal Code, it is de jure permitted to perform an abortion to save the life of the mother or in cases where their physical or mental health is at risk, for the first 120 days (approximately 4 months) of gestation. [5]

Contents

As a Muslim country, Malaysia also has a dual legal system with Muslims, which make up the majority of the population, being subject to Sharia law. In 2002, the National Fatwa Council issued a fatwa permitting abortion up to 120 days of gestation in cases when the mother's life is in danger or fetal impairment. Abortion on the grounds of rape, incest, on request or due to economical and social factors remain illegal.

Legislation and regulations

During the British colonial era, abortion in Malaya was regulated by the British Empire's 1871 Indian penal code, which banned abortion on all grounds. Other historical legislation included the 1956 Medicines Advertisement and Sale Act, which prohibited the publication of abortion advertisements. [6]

Abortion in Malaysia is currently regulated under Sections 312–316 of the Penal Code:

  1. Section 312 states that those who induce an abortion with a woman's consent can be imprisoned for a term of three years or fined or both. If the woman is "quick with child" (meaning beyond her fourth month of pregnancy), the woman and provider can be sentenced to up to seven years' imprisonment or fined.
  2. Section 313 states that those who cause an abortion without a woman's consent can be imprisoned for 20 years or fined.
  3. Section 314 states that whoever causes an involuntary abortion that leads to the woman's death can be imprisoned for ten years or fined.
  4. Section 315 states that whoever prevents a child from being born alive or causes it to die after birth can be imprisoned for ten years or fined unless it is for the purpose of saving the mother's life.
  5. Section 316 classifies causing the death of a "quick unborn child" as culpable homicide. [5] [6]

In 1971, the Parliament of Malaysia amended Section 312 of the Penal Code to permit abortion to save a woman's life. In 1989, Section 312 was amended again to permit abortion to safeguard a woman's mental and physical health. [5] [6] [7]

In addition, Section 309 of the Penal Code bans infanticide, prescribing a term of imprisonment of twenty years and a fine. The ban on infanticide has led to a high rate of abandoned babies. Between 2005 and 2011, there were a reported 517 cases of abandoned babies in Malaysia. In 2016, there were a reported 115 abandoned babies. In April 2010, the Minister of Women, Family and Community Development Shahrizat Abdul Jalil announced that the Government had classified "baby dumping" as a capital punishment offence. In response, the Prime Minister Najib Razak clarified that the Attorney General would only be prescribing the death penalty on a case-by-case basis. [8]

Notable court cases

Between 1958 and 1985, three medical professionals were prosecuted for inducing abortions in Binti AH v Public Prosecutor (1958), Mary Shim v Public Prosecutor (1962), and Public Prosecutor v Dr Nadason Kanagalingam (1985). According to Archer, these three court cases set the precedent for criminalizing abortion in Malaysia. In addition, the Malaysian Government has prosecuted several cases of infanticide. In the 1987 case Public Prosecutor vs Zamihiyah, the defendant, who was suffering from postpartum psychosis, was sentenced to time served after throwing her two-month old baby out of a car. [9] In 2012, a 19-year-old woman was sentenced to twelve years imprisonment for throwing her newborn baby out a window. [10] In 2014, a 26-year-old Indonesian domestic worker was sentenced to eight years imprisonment for killing her child in order to preserve her job. That same year, a 20-year-old college student faced trial for killing her newborn inside a hostel toilet. [11]

Nirmala abortion case, 2014–2015

In 2014, the 24-year-old Nepalese migrant worker Nirmala Thapa became the first woman in Malaysia to be tried and convicted of abortion. In early October 2014, Nirmala obtained an abortion at a clinic in Penang. The clinic was subsequently raided by the Royal Malaysia Police and the doctor was arrested. [12] In November 2014, the Penang High Court found Nirmala guilty and sentenced her to one year's imprisonment. Her trial and conviction generated substantial media coverage in Malaysia and abroad. [13] [14] The Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance of Malaysia (RRAAM) appealed Nirmala's conviction. In January 2015, the Penang High Court quashed her conviction on the grounds that Nirmala had been poorly represented during her first trial. [15] [16] The case was subsequently retried at the Bukit Mertajam Sessions Court where Nirmala's defence lawyer successfully argued that continuing the pregnancy would have posed a risk to Nirmala's life. On 21 September, Judge M Vijayalakshmi acquitted and discharged Nirmala on the grounds that the prosecution had failed to prove its case. [12]

The Malaysian authorities subsequently prosecuted Nirmala's physician, Dr Ng, under Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act on the grounds that his clinic was unsuitable for abortion services. On the day of the hearing, the defence sought clarification on the charge against Ng. After consulting with the Attorney General, the prosecution dropped the charge completely. Nirmala's case has been regarded as a landmark case for abortion rights in Malaysia. Following her acquittal, the Joint Action Group of Gender Equality (JAG), an umbrella body representing 11 Malaysian women's rights groups, called on the Malaysian Government to ensure that no women would be prosecuted for abortion in the future. [17]

Abortion services and statistics

As of 2018, the Federation of Reproductive Health Associations Malaysia (FRHAM) has estimated that there are about 90,000 abortions performed annually in Malaysia. Similarly, the Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance Malaysia (RRAAM) has estimated that there are about 240 clinics nationwide offering abortion services. While public hospitals and clinics are reluctant to provide abortion services except in circumstances when the mother's life and health is in danger, private health providers are more willing to provide abortion services but their services are unaffordable for most poorer Malaysians and migrant workers. The private health sector is also unregulated. Nadini Archer and Rashida Abdullah also report a reluctance among doctors and nurses, particularly in the public health sector, to perform abortions. There is also a misconception among medical professionals, the general public, and the media that abortion is illegal in Malaysia. [2] [4] [3]

There is also limited access to medical abortion services in Malaysia. While mifepristone is not legally available in Malaysia, misoprostol is available as a prescribed drug. Some women have also sought information on abortion pills from online providers like "Women on the Web". In 2017, the Minister of Health Subramaniam Sathasivam called for the prosecution of anyone selling or purchasing medical abortion pills online. In response, the RRAAM argued that legalising medical abortion pills would curb the black market trade. [18]

Public opinion and activism

In 1974, a national fertility and family survey found that 71% percent of women supported abortions on the grounds of rape and incest, 54.3% supported abortion for unmarried women, 52.2% supported abortion for health reasons, and 34.5% supported abortion for economic and social reasons. [19] However, there is still a strong social, religious, and cultural stigma against abortion in Malaysian society. According to Low et al., many medical professionals are unaware of abortion legislation in Malaysia. A study of Malaysian medical professionals sponsored by the United Nations Population Fund found that 59.2% of participants surveyed regarded abortion as taking a life, 43.4% opposed decriminalising abortion on demand, and that 26% refused to perform abortion on the basis of personal beliefs. [20]

Pro-choice groups operating in Malaysia have included the Asia Safe Abortion Partnership (ASAP), the Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women (ARROW), the Joint Action Group for Gender Equality (JAG) and the Reproductive Rights Advocacy Alliance Malaysia (RRAAM). Pro-choice groups have focused on lobbying the Malaysian Government into meeting its reproductive health obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) and easing restrictions on medical abortion pills like mifepristone. [21] The RRAAM was established in 2007 and worked with the Federation of Reproductive Health Association of Malaysia (FRHAM), women's NGOs, gynecologists, lawyers and feminist researchers to produce research centering women's perspectives on access to abortion in Malaysia. In 2009, a joint RRAAM–FRHAM report criticized the restricted access to abortion services in Malaysian hospitals. [4]

Anti-abortion groups in Malaysia have included the Christian–based Pro-Life Group Kuching in Sarawak, which provides anti-abortion counselling, pregnancy care and shelter for expectant mothers, and organises talks, seminars, and public expos. [22] [23]

Related Research Articles

Abortion in Ireland is regulated by the Health Act 2018. Abortion is permitted in Ireland during the first twelve weeks of pregnancy, and later in cases where the pregnant woman's life or health is at risk, or in the cases of a fatal foetal abnormality. Abortion services commenced on 1 January 2019, following its legalisation by the aforementioned Act, which became law on 20 December 2018. Previously, the 8th Constitutional Amendment had given the life of the unborn foetus the same value as that of its mother, but the 36th constitutional amendment, approved by referendum in May 2018, replaced this with a clause permitting the Oireachtas (parliament) to legislate for the termination of pregnancies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion law</span> Laws that allow, prohibit, or regulate abortion

Abortion laws vary widely among countries and territories, and have changed over time. Such laws range from abortion being freely available on request, to regulation or restrictions of various kinds, to outright prohibition in all circumstances. Many countries and territories that allow abortion have gestational limits for the procedure depending on the reason; with the majority being up to 12 weeks for abortion on request, up to 24 weeks for rape, incest, or socioeconomic reasons, and more for fetal impairment or risk to the woman's health or life. As of 2022, countries that legally allow abortion on request or for socioeconomic reasons comprise about 60% of the world's population. In 2024, France became the first country to explicitly protect abortion rights in its constitution.

Abortion in Australia is legal. There are no federal abortion laws, and full decriminalisation of the procedure has been enacted in all jurisdictions. Access to abortion varies between the states and territories: Surgical abortions are readily available on request within the first 22 to 24 weeks of pregnancy in most jurisdictions, and up to 16 weeks in Tasmania. Later-term abortions can be obtained with the approval of two doctors, although the Australian Capital Territory only requires a single physician's approval.

Abortion in Sweden was first legislated by the Abortion Act of 1938. This stated that an abortion could be legally performed in Sweden upon medical, humanitarian, or eugenical grounds. That is, if the pregnancy constituted a serious threat to the woman's life, if she had been impregnated by rape, or if there was a considerable chance that any serious condition might be inherited by her child, she could request an abortion. The law was later augmented in 1946 to include socio-medical grounds and again in 1963 to include the risk of serious fetal damage. A committee investigated whether these conditions were met in each individual case and, as a result of this prolonged process, abortion was often not granted until the middle of the second trimester. As such, a new law was created in 1974, stating that the choice of an abortion is entirely up to the woman until the end of the 18th week.

Abortion in Israel is permitted when determined by a termination committee, with the vast majority of cases being approved, as of 2019. The rate of abortion in Israel has steadily declined since 1988, and compared to the rest of the world, abortion rates in Israel are moderate. According to government data, in Israel, abortion rates in 2016 dropped steadily to 9 per 1,000 women of childbearing age, lower than England (16.2) and the United States (13.2). 99% of abortions are carried out in the first trimester. Despite allegations of permitting abortion under limited circumstances, Haaretz noted in 2019 that this is not the case, and abortion is almost always permitted in Israel.

Abortion is illegal in El Salvador. The law formerly permitted an abortion to be performed under some limited circumstances, but in 1998 all exceptions were removed when a new abortion law went into effect.

The timeline of women's legal rights (other than voting) represents formal changes and reforms regarding women's rights. The changes include actual law reforms, as well as other formal changes (e.g. reforms through new interpretations of laws by precedents). The right to vote is exempted from the timeline: for that right, see Timeline of women's suffrage. The timeline excludes ideological changes and events within feminism and antifeminism; for that, see Timeline of feminism.

This is a timeline of reproductive rights legislation, a chronological list of laws and legal decisions affecting human reproductive rights. Reproductive rights are a sub-set of human rights pertaining to issues of reproduction and reproductive health. These rights may include some or all of the following: the right to legal or safe abortion, the right to birth control, the right to access quality reproductive healthcare, and the right to education and access in order to make reproductive choices free from coercion, discrimination, and violence. Reproductive rights may also include the right to receive education about contraception and sexually transmitted infections, and freedom from coerced sterilization, abortion, and contraception, and protection from practices such as female genital mutilation (FGM).

Neonaticide is the deliberate act of a parent murdering their own child during the first 24 hours of life. As a noun, the word "neonaticide" may also refer to anyone who practices or who has practiced this.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in Colombia</span>

Abortion in Colombia is freely available on request up to the 24th week of pregnancy, due to a ruling by the Constitutional Court on February 21, 2022. Later in pregnancy, it is only allowed in cases of risk of death to the pregnant woman, fetal malformation, or rape, according to a Constitutional Court ruling in 2006.

Child destruction is the name of a statutory offence in England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Hong Kong and in some parts of Australia.

Foeticide, or feticide, is the act of killing a fetus, or causing a miscarriage. Definitions differ between legal and medical applications, whereas in law, feticide frequently refers to a criminal offense, in medicine the term generally refers to a part of an abortion procedure in which a provider intentionally induces fetal demise to avoid the chance of an unintended live birth, or as a standalone procedure in the case of selective reduction.

Forced abortion is a form of reproductive coercion that refers to the act of compelling a woman to undergo termination of a pregnancy against her will or without explicit consent. Forced abortion may also be defined as coerced abortion, and may occur due to a variety of outside forces such as societal pressure, or due to intervention by perpetrators such as an intimate partner, parental guardian, medical practitioners, or others who may cause abortion by force, threat or coercion. It may also occur by taking advantage of a situation where a pregnant individual is unable to give consent, or when valid consent is in question due to duress. This may also include the instances when the conduct was neither justified by medical or hospital treatment, which does not include instances in which the pregnant individual is at risk of life threatening injury due to unsustainable pregnancy. Similar to other forms of reproductive coercion such as forced sterilization, forced abortion may include a physical invasion of female reproductive organs, therefore creating the possibly of causing long term threat or injury preventing viable future pregnancies. Forced abortion is considered a human rights violation by the United Nations due to its failure to comply with the human right to reproductive choice and control without coercion, discrimination, and violence.

Abortion in Uganda is illegal unless performed by a licensed medical doctor in a situation where the woman's life is deemed to be at risk.

Abortion in Vanuatu is severely restricted by criminal law. Abortion is illegal under the provisions of section 117 of the Vanuatu Penal Code, Act No. 17 or 7 August 1981. The code states that any woman who intentionally induces a miscarriage is subject to up to two years' imprisonment. Abortion is illegal in cases of rape, incest, and threats to fetal health. The only allocations for abortion are "for good medical reasons", which a United Nations report interprets as to save the life of the pregnant woman and to preserve her physical and mental health. Section 113 of the code states that "No person shall, when a woman is about to be delivered of the child, prevent the child from being born alive by any act or omission of such a nature that, if the child had been born alive and had, then died..." although the italicized statement is vague about its meaning.

Abortion in Kazakhstan is legal as an elective procedure up to 12 weeks, and special circumstances afterwards. The relevant legislation is based on the laws inherited from the country's Soviet past, when abortion was legally permitted as a contraceptive.

Abortion is a controversial topic in Nigeria. Abortion in Nigeria is governed by the two laws that differs greatly depending on geographical location. Northern Nigeria is governed by The Penal Code and Southern Nigeria is governed by The Criminal Code. The only legal way to have an abortion in Nigeria is if having the child is going to put the mother's life in danger. However, sex-selective abortion has long had acceptance in Nigeria.

Abortion in Thailand is legal and available on-request up to 20 weeks of pregnancy. Abortion has been legal up to at least 12 weeks of pregnancy since 7 February 2021. Following a 2020 ruling of the Constitutional Court which declared a portion of the abortion statutes unconstitutional, the Parliament removed first-term abortion from the criminal code. Once strict, over time laws have been relaxed to take into account high rates of teen pregnancy, women who lack the means or will to raise children, and the consequences of illegal abortion.

Abortion in Egypt is prohibited by Articles 260–264 of the Penal Code of 1937. However, under Article 61 of the Penal Code, exceptions may be granted in cases of necessity, which has typically been interpreted to permit an abortion necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman. In some cases, this exception has been extended to cases where the pregnancy poses dangers to the pregnant woman's health, and to cases of foetal impairment. A physician can only perform an abortion in such cases when two specialists approve, unless the woman's life is in imminent danger.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in Kenya</span> Termination of pregnancy in Kenya

Abortion in Kenya is prohibited with the exception of certain circumstances including danger to the life and health of the expectant mother, and rape. Unsafe abortions are a major cause of deaths and health complications for women in Kenya.

References

  1. ↑ Zainuddin, Alifah (12 October 2022). "Doctor Clarifies Abortion Is Legal In Malaysia".
  2. 1 2 Archer 2018, pp. 3–4.
  3. 1 2 Low et al 2015, pp. 34–35.
  4. 1 2 3 Abdullah 2009, pp. 8–9.
  5. 1 2 3 "Penal Code Act 574" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 August 2019. Retrieved 21 August 2019.
  6. 1 2 3 Archer 2018, p. 2.
  7. ↑ Low et al 2015, p. 34.
  8. ↑ Archer 2018, p. 6.
  9. ↑ Archer 2018, pp. 5–7.
  10. ↑ "Teen seeks stay on jail term for infanticide". The Star . 25 April 2012. Archived from the original on 12 October 2019. Retrieved 12 October 2019.
  11. ↑ "Indonesian maid jailed 8 years for infanticide". The Malaysian Times . 28 March 2014. Archived from the original on 12 October 2019. Retrieved 12 October 2019.
  12. 1 2 Archer 2018, pp. 7–8.
  13. ↑ Li Yingxue, Claire; Wang Yiwei, Elaine (12–18 December 2014). "Nepali woman jailed for abortion in Malaysia". Nepali Times . Archived from the original on 12 June 2019. Retrieved 12 October 2019.
  14. ↑ Yeoh, Winnie (13 December 2014). "Lawyer seeks to quash conviction of Nepalese in abortion case". The Star . Archived from the original on 29 July 2015. Retrieved 12 October 2019.
  15. ↑ "Imprisoned in Malaysia After Legal Abortion". Center for Reproductive Rights. 25 November 2014. Retrieved 12 October 2019.
  16. ↑ Mok, Opalyn (12 January 2015). "High Court sets aside Nepali's conviction in Penang abortion case". Malay Mail . Archived from the original on 12 October 2019. Retrieved 12 October 2019.
  17. ↑ Archer 2018, pp. 8–9.
  18. ↑ Archer 2018, pp. 4–5.
  19. ↑ Archer 2018, p. 4.
  20. ↑ Low et al 2015, p. 35.
  21. ↑ Archer 2018, p. 5.
  22. ↑ "Our Mission". Pro-Life Group Kuching. Retrieved 12 October 2019.
  23. ↑ "Directory of Christian Social Concern". Malaysian CARE. Retrieved 12 October 2019.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.