Abortion in Mexico

Last updated

Legality of elective abortion in Mexico by state:
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Legal under state law during first trimester
Legal for economic reasons
Illegal under state law, but not enforced Gestational limits for elective abortion in Mexico.svg
Legality of elective abortion in Mexico by state:
  Legal under state law during first trimester
  Legal for economic reasons
  Illegal under state law, but not enforced

In Mexico, abortion on request (elective abortion) is legal at the federal level during the first twelve weeks of a pregnancy (i.e., fifteen weeks LMP). [4] Elective abortion is being gradually legalized at the state level due to rulings by the Supreme Court, and in the meantime is available in all states.

Contents

On 7 September 2021, the Mexican Supreme Court unanimously ruled that penalizing abortion is unconstitutional, setting a precedent across the country. [5] [6] Abortion has not been a federal crime in Mexico since 7 September 2023. [7] However, criminal law in Mexico varies by state. Before 2019, abortion had been severely restricted outside of Mexico City, where elective abortion was legalized in 2007. [8] [9] As of November 2024, elective abortion is legal in Mexico City and the states of Oaxaca, Hidalgo, Veracruz, Coahuila, Colima, Baja California, Sinaloa, Guerrero, Baja California Sur, Quintana Roo, Aguascalientes, Puebla, Jalisco, Michoacán, San Luis Potosí, Zacatecas, the State of Mexico, and Chiapas. Abortion for financial reasons is currently legal in Yucatán. The Supreme Court has issued judicial orders to Nayarit, Morelos, and Yucatán to harmonize their laws before the end of the legislative period (December 2024). [10] [11] [12]

Several northern states have reported people from the United States traveling to Mexico for abortions, including to states such as Nuevo León that have unenforced bans, as there is no residency requirement. [13] [14] [15] However, even in states where abortion is now legal, there continue to be women in pre-trial detention for murder due to spontaneous miscarriage.

History

In 1931, fourteen years after the writing of the national Constitution, the Mexican Government addressed abortion by making it illegal, except in the cases when the abortion is caused by the negligence of the mother, continuation of the pregnancy endangers the life of the mother, or in pregnancies resulting from rape. [16] [17] [18]

In 1974, Mexico introduced the Ley General de Población, a law requiring the government to provide free family planning services in all public health clinics, and a National Program for Family Planning to coordinate it. [19] The same year, Mexico amended its constitution to recognize every Mexican citizen's "right to freely decide, in a responsible and informed manner, on the number and spacing of their children". [19] [20] In 1991, the state of Chiapas liberalized the law on abortion. [21]

Until the 1990s, the Mexican government considerably expanded its family planning services to rural areas and less-developed parts of the country, reducing inequalities in family planning and contraceptive provision. [19] Contraceptive use doubled from 1976, but the annual rate of increase slowed down in 1992, and has come to a standstill in recent years. [19] [22]

According to data provided by the Guttmacher Institute, in 1996, Mexico had the lowest percentage of women in Latin America who underwent an abortion procedure, at 2.5%. [23] In 2009, Mexico's national abortion rate was at about 38 abortions per 1,000 for women between the ages of 15 and 44, at 3.8%. The rates are important to consider because of Mexico's stringent anti-abortion laws, and so might not be the most accurate representation of the actual data. [19] [24]

In the early 2000s, a prominent pro-choice movement known as Marea Verde gained traction in Mexico and across Latin America. Its influence inspired women to speak up and demand change. [25] Between 7 and 9 September 2021, in a unanimous 10-to-0 ruling, the Supreme Court of Justice decriminalised abortion in Coahuila and Sinaloa. [26] [27] [28] Nevertheless, the effects of these rulings are broader, as it sets a federal binding precedent: Judges cannot sentence people to jail for either having or assisting in induced abortions, even if local legislations have not changed their criminal laws. [29] The Supreme Court also established that local rules granting protections of "life from conception" were invalid, [30] and that access to legal abortions is a fundamental right of women. This historic landmark paves the path for advocates to challenge abortion restrictions in each state. [31]

However, as of 2022, there continue to be women in pre-trial detention for murder due to spontaneous miscarriage even in states where abortion is legal. [32]

Legality

On 24 April 2007, the Legislative Assembly of the Federal District (LAFD) reformed Articles 145 to 148 of the Criminal Code, and Article 14 of the Health Code, all dealing with abortion; 46 of the 66 members (from five distinct parties) of the LAFD approved the new legislation. [33] The changes expanded the previous law, which had allowed legal abortions in four limited circumstances. [34] In Mexico, abortion proceedings fall under local state legislation. A landmark Supreme Court decision in 2008 found no legal impediment to it in the Mexican Constitution, and stated that "to affirm that there is an absolute constitutional protection of life in gestation would lead to the violation of the fundamental rights of women". [35]

All states' penal codes permit abortions in cases of rape, and all but Guanajuato and Querétaro's permit it to save the mother's life. According to national law, no police report is needed for cases of rape. [36] Fourteen out of thirty-one expand these cases to include severe fetal deformities, and the state of Yucatán includes economic factors when the mother has previously given birth to three or more children. [37] Nevertheless, according to Jo Tuckman of The Guardian , in practice, almost no state provided access to abortions in the cases listed, [38] and since the Supreme Court decision, abortion providers are not prosecuted for carrying out abortions.

There are, however, some exceptions. Since 2007, Mexico City, where approximately 7.87% of the national population lives, [39] offers abortion on request to any woman up to 12 weeks into a pregnancy, [40] which, along with Cuba, Uruguay, and Argentina, is one of the most liberal legislations on this matter in Latin America. [38] In contrast, recent political lobbying on behalf of the dominant Roman Catholic Church and anti-abortion organizations has resulted in the amendment of more than half of the state constitutions, which now define a fertilized human egg as a "person", with a "right to legal protection". [41] As of 15 October 2009, none of those states removed its exceptions to abortion to reflect the changes in its constitution, [37] but according to Human Rights Watch and a local NGO, over the past eight years, the conservative-leaning state of Guanajuato "has denied every petition by a pregnant rape victim for abortion services", and about 130 of its residents have been sentenced for seeking or providing illegal abortion. [42] However, these days, the government is aware of the existence of the institution called "Las Libres de Guanajuato" which provides abortions and support for women in need, and ignores its existence. [43]

Following the decriminalization of abortions in the Distrito Federal, also known as Mexico City, the states of Baja California and San Luis Potosí enacted laws in 2008 bestowing "personhood" rights from the moment of conception. [44] In September 2011, the Supreme Court rejected two actions to overturn the laws enacted by the states of Baja California and San Luis Potosí for unconstitutionality. The Court recognized "the power of the state legislature" to enact laws on the subject. However, their decision does not criminalize or decriminalize abortion in Mexico. [16] [40]

The September 2021 Supreme Court's ruling states that embryos cannot have the same rights and protections to any born person. Fetuses have protections that increment with time, but will never be ahead of the reproductive freedom of the pregnant woman. It also declared that clandestine abortions put the lives of women at risk, creates inequality, and produce unnecessary fears over health professionals (doctors and nurses). [45] Thus, the illegality of abortion contravenes article 4 of the Mexican Constitution which allows reproductive rights and access to health services to any Mexican citizen.

This decriminalisation is the first step towards legalisation. Just like same-sex marriage, each of the 28 local legislations that do not allow safe and free abortions on request will now be forced to change their laws. Each state will establish the frame of time (weeks or months of the pregnancy) to have access to an elective abortion. Many NGOs like GIRE have declared they will push for the twelve-week frame, just like in Mexico City, Oaxaca, Hidalgo, and Veracruz. [46] If local legislations do not change anything, the Supreme Court could intervene declaring unconstitutionality (like in Coahuila and Sinaloa in September 2021), pushing even more for legalisation. Also, amparos would be automatically granted to any citizen that wants to exercise their right to abortion on those states that have not changed the law. [47]

After this last ruling, public institutions like the Instituto de la Defensoría Pública Federal declared they will help all those women, on any state, under prosecution or in jail, accused of any criminal charge related to induced abortion. [48] In Mexico, Supreme Court rulings are not retroactive, except when human rights are involved. Local attorneys on those states that have not changed their laws could still prosecute people that have undergone abortions, specially those more conservative, but judges will not whatsoever declare them guilty. Some hard-line conservative judges may still try to incarcerate someone, but that case would escalate to higher judicial institutions that will automatically invalidate the sentence, and the judge would be heavily punished for human rights violations. In other words, it's socially and legally unethical for a judge to incarcerate a woman that underwent an abortion in Mexico. [49]

State law and court decisions

The National Supreme Court of Justice ruled on 7 August 2019 that rape victims have the right to receive abortions in public hospitals. Girls younger than 12 need parental permission. [50]

On 25 September 2019, Oaxaca became the second state, after Mexico City, to decriminalise abortion up to 12 weeks of pregnancy. The vote in the state legislature was 24 in favor, and 12 against. It is estimated that before decriminalisation, 9,000 illegal abortions were performed in Oaxaca every year, 17% of them on women of 20 or younger. Abortion was the third cause of maternal mortality, and there were 20 women in prison for illegal abortions. [51]

In October 2019, Las Comisiones Unidas de Procuración y Administración de Justicia y de Igualdad de Género (The United Commissions for the Procuration and Administration of Justice and Gender Equality) in Puebla voted against decriminalization of abortion and legalization of same-sex marriage. The penalty for abortion was reduced from five years to one year. A majority of the legislators were elected by the Together We Will Make History coalition; and Marcelo García Almaguer of the National Action Party called out members of National Regeneration Movement for doublespeak, since they call themselves "progressives", yet voted to support the criminalization of women. [52]

In September 2021, the Supreme Court of Justice ordered the state of Coahuila (articles 196, 198, and 199) and the state of Sinaloa (article 4 Bis A) to remove sanctions and restrictions for abortion from its criminal code and local Constitution, respectively. This decision stems from 2017, when former Attorney General Raúl Cervantes challenged the constitutionality of both laws. [53] That same day, the Government of the state of Coahuila ordered the immediate liberation of all women imprisoned on pre-trial detention. Those women with a previous sentence will be released with the aid of an amparo. [54]

Timeline

Legalisation of abortion on request in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy
Federal entityDate of enactment/rulingDate effectiveLegalization methodDetails
Flag of Aguascalientes.svg Aguascalientes 30 August 202330 August 2023Judicial decisionRuling of the Supreme Court [55]
14 December 202328 December 2023Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Aguascalientes
Flag of Baja California.svg Baja California 29 October 202113 November 2021Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Baja California [56]
Flag of Baja California Sur.svg Baja California Sur 2 June 202215 June 2022Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Baja California Sur [57]
Flag of Chiapas.svg Chiapas 26 November 202428 November 2024Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Chiapas [58]
Flag of Coahuila.svg Coahuila 7 September 20217 September 2021Judicial decisionRuling of the Supreme Court [59]
Flag of Colima.svg Colima 1 December 202111 December 2021Constitutional amendment and legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Colima [60]
Flag of Guerrero.svg Guerrero 17 May 202221 May 2022Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Guerrero [61]
Flag of Hidalgo.svg Hidalgo 30 June 20217 July 2021Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Hidalgo [62]
Flag of Jalisco.svg Jalisco 4 October 20249 October 2024Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Jalisco [63]
Flag of the State of Mexico.svg State of Mexico 25 November 20247 December 2024Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of the State of México [64]
Flag of Mexico City.svg Mexico City 24 April 200727 April 2007Legislative statutePassed by the Legislative Assembly of Mexico City [65]
Flag of Michoacan.svg Michoacán 10 October 202412 October 2024Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Michoacán [66]
Flag of Oaxaca.svg Oaxaca 25 September 201925 October 2019Legislative statute and constitutional amendmentPassed by the Congress of Oaxaca [67] [68]
Flag of Puebla.svg Puebla 15 July 202415 August 2024Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Puebla [69]
Flag of Quintana Roo.svg Quintana Roo 26 October 202229 October 2022Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Quintana Roo [70]
Flag of San Luis Potosi.svg San Luis Potosí 7 November 202413 November 2024Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of San Luis Potosí [71]
Flag of Sinaloa.svg Sinaloa 9 March 20229 April 2022Constitutional amendment and legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Sinaloa [72]
Flag of Veracruz.svg Veracruz 20 July 202121 July 2021Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Veracruz [73]
Flag of Zacatecas.svg Zacatecas 20 November 20241 November 2024Legislative statutePassed by the Congress of Zacatecas [36]


Influence from CEDAW

The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) was created with the idea of eliminating discrimination against women, in both the private and public sectors. [74] While within the treaty itself there is no mention or use of the word "abortion", CEDAW has made clear that abortion restrictions are to be viewed as a form of discrimination against women. [75] CEDAW, therefore, encourages the international community to reduce restrictions, or outright legalize abortions. [76]

Mexico is a party to CEDAW, meaning not only has Mexico signed CEDAW but has also ratified it (or in other words incorporated the treaty into the nation's domestic laws). [77] As a party to CEDAW, this allows the CEDAW committee to monitor and review Mexico's policies and practices which affect the rights of women. [78] The CEDAW Committee's recommendations to the Mexican State in 2006 specifically mention these issues. [33] As of September 2021, Mexico City, Oaxaca, Veracruz and Hidalgo allow abortions with few restrictions, and with Mexico's Supreme Court recent ruling Coahuila, another Mexican state, must move towards decriminalizing abortion. [79]

Effects of legislation

With the new legislation, the law redefines the term abortion. [33] An abortion is the legal termination of a pregnancy of 13 weeks of gestation or more. [33] During the first 12 weeks of gestation, the procedure is labeled the "legal termination of pregnancy'. [33] In addition, the term pregnancy was officially defined as beginning when the embryo is implanted in the endometrium. [33] This helps to determine gestational age, and, according to the research team of Maria Sanchez Fuentes, "implicitly legitimizes any post-coital contraceptive method, including emergency contraception ... and assisted reproduction (including infertility treatments such as IVF) and stem-cell research". [33] Women charged with having an illegal abortion have their sentences reduced, and the penalty for forcing a woman to have an abortion against her own will, which includes her partner or a physician, is increased. [33] If physical violence is involved, the penalty is even higher. [33] Furthermore, the law explicitly states that sexual and reproductive health are a priority in health services, with the goal of preventing unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). [33]

According to an unofficial report by the organization Grupo de Información en Reproducción Elegida (GIRE), between 2009 and 2011, 679 women have charged with the crime of abortion in the interior of the country. [80] [81] In the report, GIRE states that having legislation for each entity makes "access to abortion a matter of social injustice and gender discrimination." [80] [81] According to the Omisión e Indiferencia: Derechos reproductivos en México (Omission and Indifference: Reproductive Rights in Mexico) presented by GIRE, only women with economic resources and information can travel to Mexico City to have an abortion "without the risk of being persecuted for committing a crime or do it in precarious conditions." [80] [81] [82] Although there are no official figures on clandestine abortions in the country, GIRE estimated that in 2009 159,000 women rushed to a hospital for complications of unsafe and illegal abortions. [80] [81] [82]

Impact on health and the economy

Research done by Maria Sanchez Fuentes et al. concludes that the health and economic costs of unsafe abortion are very high, in common with other preventable illnesses. [33] Moreover, those costs are higher for poor women, because only women with economic means and sufficient information can access abortion under safe medical conditions in Mexico, or travel to foreign countries where abortion is legal throughout. [33] After the amendments to the abortion law in 2007, abortion services are now free of charge in public hospitals for Mexico City residents, who account for approximately one-quarter of the country's population, and are available for a moderate fee for women from other states or countries. [33]

Before the passage of the amendments to the abortion law, many Mexican women would buy herbs from the market and try dangerous home versions of abortion in order to end their unwanted pregnancies. [83] Women also resorted to buying prescription drugs, obtained from pharmacists without a doctor's signature, that would induce an abortion. [83] Moreover, some women even ingested huge doses of drugs for arthritis and gastritis, available over the counter, which can cause miscarriages. [83] All of these methods are significantly dangerous, and most are illegal.

The fifth leading cause of maternal mortality in Mexico is illegal, unsafe abortion. [33] [84] A huge proportion of poor and young women are forced to risk their health and lives in the conditions under which many clandestine abortions are practiced. [33] This highlights the costs of unsafe abortion to the public health system. [33] In addition, women who undergo unsafe abortions and suffer complications or death represent the fourth highest cause of hospital admissions in Mexico's public hospitals. [33] The Department of Health statistics show that in Mexico City, maternal mortality has been reduced significantly since the passage of the new law. [83]

During 2008, the public health sector, under Mexico City's Department of Health, carried out 13,057 legal abortions, compared to 66 abortions between 2002 and 2007, when the legal indications were restricted to the four circumstances of rape, danger to the woman's life and health and congenital malformations. [85] At the end of April 2007, the city's Department of Health started providing first trimester abortions free of charge to the estimated 43 percent of women residing in Mexico City with no public health insurance. [85]

Demographics and public opinion

A 2008 study funded by the National Population Council (CONAPO), El Colegio de México and the Guttmacher Institute estimated 880,000 abortions carried out annually, with an average of 33 abortions a year for every 1,000 women between the ages of 15 and 44. [86] However, such studies are speculative—as abortion is highly restricted and reliable data is not readily available—with some estimates ranging as low as 297,000 abortions per year. [87]

By 19 January 2011, 52,484 abortions have been carried out in Mexico City since its decriminalization in 2007, [8] where some 85 percent of the gynecologists in the city's public hospitals have declared themselves conscientious objectors. [88] Among the petitioners, 78% were local residents, 21% were living out-of-state and 1% were foreigners from countries such as Germany, Argentina and Canada. [8] As for their age, 0.6% were between 11 and 14, 47.6% were between 18 and 24, 22% between 25 and 29, 13% between 30 and 34 and 2.7% between 40 and 44 years old. More than half were single. [8]

As of April 2012, roughly 78,544 women had undergone free legal terminations of pregnancy (LTP) without major complications—an average of 15,709 per year since the law passed in 2007. [80] [89] According to the United Nations, more than 500,000 Mexican women seek illegal abortions every year, with more than 2,000 dying from botched or unsafe procedures. [34] [90]

Political community

In the presidential election of 2006, a conservative candidate from the PAN won the election by an "infinitesimal percentage, and the progressive PRD candidate claimed fraud." [33] An article by Sanchez Fuentes et al., suggested that this caused polarization between the two parties and within Mexican society in general. [33] Since the PRD lost the presidential election, but maintained control of the local legislature and Mayor's Office in Mexico City, they demonstrated the differences between the left- and right-wing parties in the reproductive-rights context by supporting the change in the law. [33]

In 2007, the legal proposal to decriminalize abortion, led by the PRI, was introduced in the Mexico City Legislative Assembly (LAFD). [83] In this Mexico City abortion reform, "the policy community (including the center-left political parties; the Mexico City government, represented by the Mayor's Office; the local Ministry of Health; and the local Human Rights Ombudsman), along with academics, opinion leaders, and leading scientists, was very much united, and vocal in support of decriminalization". [33] Mexico City's then-mayor Marcelo Ebrard, from the PRD, declared, "This is a women's cause, but it is also the city's cause." [33] Manifestations of support for the bill came in the form of public announcements by public figures, printed in national newspapers, which are a key means of influencing public opinion and debate in Mexico, as well as via press declarations, and interviews, as suggested by. [33] A public announcement published on 17 April 2007 by the Academy of Bioethics outlined why the decriminalization of up to 12 weeks was not contradictory to scientific evidence, and affirmed that "an embryo at this stage has not developed a cerebral cortex or nerve endings, does not feel pain, and is not a human being or person". [33] Sanchez Fuentes et al. concluded that this bioethics perspective influenced the discourse surrounding the debate. [33]

On 31 December 2020, President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (MORENA) proposed that the government sponsor a consultation among the nation's women regarding the legalization of abortion. [91] After Mexico's Supreme Court ruling, President López Obrador remained noncommittal on the subject and stated "If it's already at the Supreme Court, then let it be resolved there." [92]

Anti-abortion movement by the Catholic Church

Knowing the potential involvement of the Catholic church on this reform, the Mexico City Legislative Assembly (LAFD) framed abortion as a necessary protection for women, particularly poor women. [34] This was meant to resonate especially with the largely Catholic population, religious interest groups, and the Catholic healthcare professionals. [34] While public opinion in Mexico City is largely in favor of legal abortion, the negotiation with religious as well as conscientiously objecting doctors and nurses was proven difficult. [34] [93] Their religious faith had a major impact on the negotiation, because of Catholic's view on abortion as a sin.

The anti-abortion movement in Mexico has been led by the Catholic Church. [34] The Church remains influential in Mexico, and in any discussion of abortion, the government discusses the reactions and policies of the Church. [34] It is also the Church's influence that has guided the debate towards a public health rationale rather than a reproductive choice rationale—staying away from a pro-choice stance. [34] After the law was passed in April 2007, the Catholic Church collected 70,000 signatures supporting an abortion referendum. [83]

Under Articles 6 and 24, the Mexican constitution protects citizens with freedom of religion in Mexico. [34] During the first few weeks after the law passed in 2007, many doctors and nurses did not partake in abortions, citing their Catholic faith. [34] [94] [95] The LAFD dealt with the Church's influence on public hospitals and their employees by reinforcing the reforms made in the Robles law (the law permitting abortion to be legal in Federal District (Mexico) and requiring, in Article 14 Bis 6 of the Health Law, that once again hospitals must have non-objecting doctors on call for abortions). [34] The Robles Law uses language that makes it clear that the right to object on religious grounds is not absolute and that the woman's right to receive the abortion trumps the doctor's right to object where no non-objecting doctor can be located. [34] Furthermore, Article 14 Bis 3 established the Clinical Commission for Evaluation to ensure that doctors were performing abortions and that every time a woman requests information about an abortion, it is recorded by an independent, centralized body of the government. [34] Former Secretary of Health, Manuel Mondragon, under the Mayor of Mexico City, Marcelo Ebrard, ensured that abortions were readily available to women who sought them under the legal circumstances. [34] Essentially, the law incorporates a conscientious objection exemption for health care providers, and similarly requires that hospitals then provide a woman with an alternate provider, who will perform the abortion. [34] [94] Furthermore, the separation of church and state is enshrined in the Mexican Reform Laws of 1859, [33] and some attempts by the Church to influence abortion law were illegal. [33] The major separation of the church and state did not permit for religious reasoning to be the major influence on policies, but the Catholic church threatened to prohibit the individuals supporting the policy from attending any religious sanctions and ceremonies.

According to Sanchez Fuentes et al., more than 80 percent of the women who have sought services are Catholic, and formally educated, claiming to help destigmatize abortion, influencing public opinion. [33]

Surveys

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion law</span> Laws that allow, prohibit, or regulate abortion

Abortion laws vary widely among countries and territories, and have changed over time. Such laws range from abortion being freely available on request, to regulation or restrictions of various kinds, to outright prohibition in all circumstances. Many countries and territories that allow abortion have gestational limits for the procedure depending on the reason; with the majority being up to 12 weeks for abortion on request, up to 24 weeks for rape, incest, or socioeconomic reasons, and more for fetal impairment or risk to the woman's health or life. As of 2022, countries that legally allow abortion on request or for socioeconomic reasons comprise about 60% of the world's population. In 2024, France became the first country to explicitly protect abortion rights in its constitution, while Yugoslavia implicitly inscribed abortion rights in its constitution in 1974.

Chile's abortion laws have evolved significantly in recent years. Since 2017, abortion has been legal under three specific circumstances: when the woman's life is at risk, in cases of rape, and in instances of severe fetal malformations. Despite these legal changes, some medical professionals refuse to perform abortions, particularly in rape cases.

Abortion in Brazil is a crime, with penalties of one to three years of imprisonment for the recipient of the abortion, and one to four years of imprisonment for the doctor or any other person who performs the abortion on someone else. In three specific situations in Brazil, induced abortion is not punishable by law: in cases of risk to the pregnant woman’s life; when the pregnancy is the result of rape; and if the fetus is anencephalic. In these cases, the Brazilian government provides the abortion procedure free of charge through the Sistema Único de Saúde. This does not mean that the law regards abortion in these cases as a right, but only that women who receive abortions under these circumstances, and the doctors, will not be punished. The punishment for a woman who performs an abortion on herself or consents to an abortion performed by another outside these legal exceptions is one to three years of detention. The base penalty for a third party that performs an illegal abortion with the consent of the patient, ranges from one to four years of detention, with the possibility of increase by a third if the woman comes to any physical harm, and can be doubled if she dies. Criminal penalties fixed at four years or less can be converted to non-incarceration punishments, such as community service and compulsory donation to charity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Olga Sánchez Cordero</span> Mexican politician and lawyer

Olga María del Carmen Sánchez Cordero Dávila is a Mexican politician and former jurist. She served as Secretary of the Interior under President Andrés Manuel López Obrador from 2018 to 2021, the first woman to serve in the position.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Mexico</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) rights in Mexico expanded in the 21st century, keeping with worldwide legal trends. The intellectual influence of the French Revolution and the brief French occupation of Mexico (1862–67) resulted in the adoption of the Napoleonic Code, which decriminalized same-sex sexual acts in 1871. Laws against public immorality or indecency, however, have been used to prosecute persons who engage in them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in Argentina</span>

Abortion in Argentina is legal as an elective medical procedure during the first 14 weeks from conception. The abortion law was liberalized when the Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy Bill was passed by the National Congress in December 2020. According to the law, any woman can request the procedure at any public or private health facility. Doctors are legally bound to either perform it or, if they are conscientious objectors, refer the patient to another physician or health facility. Only three other Latin or South American countries legalised abortion on request nationwide before Argentina did: Cuba in 1965, Guyana in 1995, and Uruguay in 2012. According to polling in 2020, around 44% of Argentines support the legalization of abortion on request; other polls showed 50–60% of Argentines opposed the bill.

The timeline of women's legal rights (other than voting) represents formal changes and reforms regarding women's rights. The changes include actual law reforms, as well as other formal changes (e.g., reforms through new interpretations of laws by precedents). The right to vote is exempted from the timeline: for that right, see Timeline of women's suffrage. The timeline excludes ideological changes and events within feminism and antifeminism; for that, see Timeline of feminism.

This is a timeline of reproductive rights legislation, a chronological list of laws and legal decisions affecting human reproductive rights. Reproductive rights are a sub-set of human rights pertaining to issues of reproduction and reproductive health. These rights may include some or all of the following: the right to legal or safe abortion, the right to birth control, the right to access quality reproductive healthcare, and the right to education and access in order to make reproductive choices free from coercion, discrimination, and violence. Reproductive rights may also include the right to receive education about contraception and sexually transmitted infections, and freedom from coerced sterilization, abortion, and contraception, and protection from practices such as female genital mutilation (FGM).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in Argentina</span>

The status of women in Argentina has changed significantly following the return of democracy in 1983; and they have attained a relatively high level of equality. In the Global Gender Gap Report prepared by the World Economic Forum in 2009, Argentine women ranked 24th among 134 countries studied in terms of their access to resources and opportunities relative to men. They enjoy comparable levels of education, and somewhat higher school enrollment ratios than their male counterparts. They are well integrated in the nation's cultural and intellectual life, though less so in the nation's economy. Their economic clout in relation to men is higher than in most Latin American countries, however, and numerous Argentine women hold top posts in the Argentine corporate world; among the best known are María Amalia Lacroze de Fortabat, former CEO and majority stakeholder of Loma Negra, the nation's largest cement manufacturer, and Ernestina Herrera de Noble, director of Grupo Clarín, the premier media group in Argentina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in Colombia</span>

Abortion in Colombia is freely available on request up to the 24th week of pregnancy, due to a ruling by the Constitutional Court on February 21, 2022. Later in pregnancy, it is only allowed in cases of risk of death to the pregnant woman, fetal malformation, or rape, according to a Constitutional Court ruling in 2006.

The Dominican Republic is one of 24 countries in the world and one of six in Latin America that has a complete ban on abortion. This complete ban includes situations in which a pregnant person’s life is at risk.

Abortion in Spain is legal upon request up to 14 weeks of pregnancy, and at later stages in cases of risk to the life or health of the woman or serious fetal defects.

Abortion in Costa Rica is severely restricted by criminal law. Currently, abortions are allowed in Costa Rica only in order to preserve the life or physical health of the woman. Abortions are illegal in almost all cases, including when the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest and when the foetus suffers from medical problems or birth defects. Both social and economic factors have led to this legal status. It remains unclear whether abortions are legal to preserve the mental health of the woman, though the 2013 United Nations abortion report says Costa Rica does allow abortions concerning the mental health of a woman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Verónica Cruz Sánchez</span> Mexican human rights activist (born 1971)

Verónica Cruz Sánchez is a Mexican human rights defender. She was the first Mexican to be awarded the Defender of Human Rights award from Human Rights Watch. In 2006, she was awarded the honor for her work with women's right to access legal and medical services. She brings public awareness to the situation of predominantly uneducated, indigenous and impoverished women who are imprisoned for abortion and miscarriage in Mexico. Cruz has worked to decriminalize and destigmatize women's decisions over their bodies and reproductive rights. She is founder of Las Libres, an organization dedicated to the defense, guarantee and respect of human rights for women in the state of Guanajuato and across Mexico.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marta Lamas</span> Mexican anthropologist

Marta Lamas Encabo is a Mexican anthropologist and political science professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), and lecturer at the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM). She is one of Mexico's leading feminists and has written many books aimed at reducing discrimination by opening public discourse on feminism, gender, prostitution and abortion. Since 1990, Lamas has edited one of Latin America's most important feminist journals, Debate Feminista. In 2005, she was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.

Same-sex marriage is legal in Puebla in accordance with a ruling from the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. On 1 August 2017, the Supreme Court ruled that the same-sex marriage ban containted in the state's Civil Code violated Articles 1 and 4 of the Constitution of Mexico, legalizing same-sex marriage in the state of Puebla. The ruling was officially published in the Official Journal of the Federation on 16 February 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy Bill (Argentina)</span>

The Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy Law was approved by the National Congress of Argentina in 2020, legalizing abortion in Argentina. The first draft of the bill was created in 2006 by the National Campaign for the Right to Legal, Safe, and Free Abortion, which sought to have Congress consider it in seven different occasions, to no avail.

Abortion in Francoist Spain and the transition period was illegal. Francoists opposed abortion because it interfered with Spanish population growth. Abortion was only briefly legal in Spain in this period in Catalonia in the final days of the Spanish Civil War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paula Ávila-Guillén</span> Colombian lawyer and activist

Paula Avila-Guillen is a Colombian lawyer, specialist in human rights, and sexual and reproductive rights activist in Latin America. Currently, she is the Execute Director of the Women's Equality Center. At La-WEC, she works and collaborate with Latin-American organizations and leaders who works for the reproductive freedom in the region, designing strategies such as legal defense tactics and communication campaigns.

The Green Wave or Green Tide is a grouping of abortion-rights movements in various countries in the Americas that have collectively adopted the colour green as a symbol of their movement and successfully pushed governments to expand abortion access in multiple countries across Latin America, a region known for some of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the world. While Latin America is a diverse region with a large range of abortion policies, the Green Wave has made its way across the area and has had a profound impact on abortion policies.

References

  1. The wording of the law is that it is legal in the first 12 weeks or before the 13th week; this is equivalent to 15 weeks gestational age in the US
  2. This includes if the mother already has 3 children.
  3. All state laws grant exceptions for rape and life of the mother; many also for maternal health and fetal defects, but a police report not required for the rape exemption, and in any case, abortion-providers are not prosecuted since the Supreme Court ruling
  4. In Mexico, pregnancy is counted from implantationp. 19 rather than from the end of the last menstruation.
  5. Romo, Vanessa (7 September 2021). "Mexico's Supreme Court Has Voted To Decriminalize Abortion". National Public Radio . Retrieved 9 September 2021.
  6. González, Oriana (7 September 2021). "Mexico's supreme court decriminalizes abortion". Axios . Retrieved 9 September 2021.
  7. "Mexico's Supreme Court Orders Federal Decriminalization of Abortion". Human Rights Watch. 8 September 2023.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Gómez, Natalia (6 February 2011). "Realizan abortos legales sin regulación". El Universal (in Spanish). Mexico City. Archived from the original on 31 August 2014. Retrieved 6 February 2011.
  9. Gaestel, Allyn; Shelley, Allison (1 October 2014). "Mexican women pay high price for country's rigid abortion laws". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 July 2016.
  10. Díaz, Arantza (2 August 2024). "Nayarit despenaliza el aborto; falta reforma a leyes locales: Te explicamos". Cimac Noticias.
  11. Mata, Ana Lilia (10 November 2024). "Antes del 15 de diciembre, reforma sobre aborto: Rafael Reyes". La Unión.
  12. "Suprema Corte de Justicia ordena al Congreso de Yucatán despenalizar el aborto". Animal Político. 21 August 2024.
  13. Quiroz, Lilly (31 August 2022). "This Mexican clinic is offering discreet abortions to Americans just over the border". National Public Radio . Retrieved 31 August 2022.
  14. Weiss, Elias (28 June 2022). "Arizona Women Eye Mexico for Abortions, Amid Conflicting Advice". Phoenix New Times. Archived from the original on 12 July 2022. Retrieved 26 July 2022.
  15. Linares, Albinson; Telemundo, Noticias Telemundo; Gutiérrez, Maricruz (1 July 2022). "'We're here': Mexican groups slam U.S. abortion restrictions as they help more American women". NBC News. Archived from the original on 26 July 2022. Retrieved 26 July 2022.
  16. 1 2 Jelen, Ted G.; Jonathan Doc Bradley (2012). "Abortion Opinion in Emerging Democracies: Latin America and Central Europe" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  17. Hassmann, Melissa (2005). Abortion Politics in North America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishing, Inc.
  18. "UN Report-Mexico". United Nations. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 Juarez, F (2013). Unintended Pregnancy and Induced Abortion in Mexico: Causes and Consequences (PDF). New York: Guttmacher Institute.
  20. Gobierno de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. "Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Capítulo I de los Derechos Humanos y sus Garantías, Artículo 4" (in Spanish). Archived from the original on 17 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  21. Cad. "Mexico: State Loosens Abortion Law". Off Our Backs, vol. 21, no. 3, 1991, pp. 11–11. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/20833453 accessed 21 March 2019
  22. Fuentes, M Urbina (2005). Política de población y los programas de planificación familiar, en: Valdés L ed., La ley de población a treinta años de distancia: reflexiones, análisis y propuestas (in Spanish). Mexico City: UNAM. pp. 339–353.
  23. "An Overview of Clandestine Abortion in Latin America". Guttmacher Institute. December 1996. Archived from the original on 17 March 2014. Retrieved 12 March 2014.
  24. "Fact Sheet: Unintended Pregnancy and Induced Abortion In Mexico". Guttmacher Institute. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  25. gazetteterrymurphy (26 October 2022). "Lesson from Latin America for U.S. abortion rights movement". Harvard Gazette. Retrieved 13 November 2023.
  26. "Despenalización del aborto en Coahuila: Esto es lo que debes saber sobre la resolución de la Corte". El Financiero (in Spanish). 8 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  27. "Sinaloa y Coahuila: ¿Qué sigue tras los fallos de la Corte sobre el aborto?". Expansión (in Spanish). 9 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  28. "Mexico's supreme court rules criminal penalties for abortion unconstitutional". The Guardian. 7 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  29. "Mexico's top court decriminalizes abortion in "watershed moment"". Reuters. 8 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  30. "Mexico's Supreme Court rules right to life from conception is unconstitutional". Reuters. 9 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  31. ""Feeling free": women criminalized by Mexico's abortion bans celebrate ruling". Reuters. 9 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  32. Urieta, Itzel (1 December 2022). "Aurelia García, joven indígena de Guerrero, enfrenta al Estado por un aborto involuntario". Animal Político. Retrieved 26 March 2024.
  33. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Sanchez Fuentes, Maria Luisa; Jennifer Paine; Brook Elliott-Buettner (July 2008). "The Decriminalisation of Abortion in Mexico City: How Did Abortion Rights Become a Political Priority?". Gender and Development. 16 (2): 345–360. doi:10.1080/13552070802120533. JSTOR   20461278. S2CID   146457306.
  34. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Johnson, Thea B. (2013). "GUARANTEED ACCESS TO SAFE AND LEGAL ABORTIONS: THE TRUE REVOLUTION OF MEXICO CITY'S LEGAL REFORMS REGARDING ABORTION" (PDF). Columbia Human Rights Law Review. 2. 44 (437). Retrieved 16 March 2014.
  35. Miller Llana, Sara (28 August 2008). "Mexico's Supreme Court upholds abortion law". Christian Science Monitor. Mexico City. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  36. 1 2 "Decreto #16". Suplemento al periódico oficial. Tomo CXXXIV, Núm. 96. Zacatecas, 30 de noviembre de 2024 (in Spanish). 20 November 2024.
  37. 1 2 "State Legislation". Grupo de Información en Reproducción Elegida, A.C. 2012. Archived from the original on 27 February 2014. Retrieved 24 July 2012.
  38. 1 2 Tuckman, Jo (29 August 2008). "Judges uphold abortion rights in Mexico City". The Guardian. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  39. "Population of Mexico City as a percentage of the national population of Mexico". Wolfram Alpha. 2007. Retrieved 17 October 2009.
  40. 1 2 Ellingwood, Ken (29 August 2008). "Mexican Supreme Court upholds legalized abortion law". Los Angeles Times. Mexico City. Retrieved 18 October 2009.
  41. "Temen se extienda prohibición al aborto en el país". El Financiero en línea (in Spanish). Mexico City. 13 October 2009. Archived from the original on 2 October 2018. Retrieved 19 October 2009.
  42. "Mexico: Stop Blocking Abortions for Rape Victims". New York: Human Rights Watch. 5 March 2009. Retrieved 19 October 2009.
  43. Lysakowska, Anna (2014). "The Politics of Abortion in Mexico: A study based on the examples of the states of Distrito Federal and Guanajuato". ISBN   978-3659527661.
  44. "La legalidad del aborto en México a discusión en la Suprema Corte". CNN. 2011. Retrieved 16 March 2014.
  45. "SCJN declara inconstitucional una ley que reconoce a "la vida humana desde la concepción"". El Economista (in Spanish). 9 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  46. "Estándar del aborto voluntario es a las 12 semanas de gestación: GIRE". Aristegui Noticias (in Spanish). 8 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  47. "Despenalización del aborto abre puerta al amparo en Guanajuato". Milenio (in Spanish). 7 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  48. "Tras despenalización del aborto, buscarán liberar a mujeres sentenciadas por este delito: Zaldívar". El Universal (in Spanish). 8 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  49. "México despenaliza el aborto: ¿qué pasará ahora en los Estados del país?". El País (in Spanish). 8 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  50. "México: La Corte Suprema de Justicia avala aborto por violación" [Mexico: Supreme Court approves abortion in cases of rape]. CNN Espanol (in Spanish). 7 August 2019. Retrieved 9 August 2019.
  51. "Congreso de Oaxaca aprueba despenalizar el aborto" [Congress of Oaxaca decriminalizes abortion], Milenio (in Spanish), 25 September 2019, retrieved 5 October 2019
  52. Gabriela Hernandez (5 October 2019), "Legisladores poblanos cierran paso a la despenalización del aborto y al matrimonio igualitario" [Puebla legislators close path to decriminalization of abortion and legalization of equal marriage], Proceso (in Spanish)
  53. "Mexico's Supreme Court rules that abortion is not a crime". Associated Press. 7 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  54. "El Gobierno de Coahuila ordena liberar a las mujeres encarceladas por abortar". El País (in Spanish). 8 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  55. Morland, Sarah (30 August 2023). "Mexican state of Aguascalientes becomes 12th to decriminalize abortion". Reuters . Retrieved 30 August 2023.
  56. "El estado mexicano de Baja California despenaliza el aborto". Agencia EFE (in Spanish). 30 October 2021.
  57. Blust, Kendal (3 June 2022). "Baja California Sur is now the 9th Mexican state to decriminalize abortion". Fronteras Desk. KJZZ/Rio Salado College. Retrieved 3 June 2022.
  58. "Chiapas despenaliza el aborto; se convierte en el estado 19 en avalarlo hasta la semana 12". Animal Político (in Spanish). 26 November 2024.
  59. "Oficial: el aborto quedó despenalizado en Coahuila; modifican Código Penal". Vanguardia (in Spanish). 29 September 2021.
  60. "Estado mexicano de Colima avala la despenalización del aborto". Agencia EFE (in Spanish). 2 December 2021.
  61. "Mexico's Guerrero state becomes ninth to allow abortions". Reuters . 18 May 2022. Retrieved 26 May 2022.
  62. "El estado mexicano de Hidalgo aprueba despenalizar el aborto". Agencia EFE (in Spanish). 30 June 2021.
  63. "Jalisco will be the 13th Mexican state to decriminalize abortion". Mexico News Daily. 26 April 2024.
  64. McKinley Jr., James C. (25 April 2007). "Mexico City Legalizes Abortion Early in Term". The New York Times . Retrieved 25 April 2007.
  65. "Despenalizan el aborto en Michoacán; suman 15 estados donde es legal". Proceso (in Spanish). 10 October 2024.
  66. "Mexico's Oaxaca state legalizes abortion in historic move". Reuters . 25 September 2019. Retrieved 25 March 2024.
  67. Agren, David (26 September 2019). ""We have made history": Mexico's Oaxaca state decriminalises abortion". The Guardian . Retrieved 30 September 2019.
  68. "El Congreso del estado mexicano de Puebla despenaliza el aborto y grupos proaborto celebran". Agencia EFE (in Spanish). 16 July 2024.
  69. "Mexico's Quintana Roo state decriminalises abortion". Al Jazeera . 26 October 2022. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
  70. "Congreso de San Luis Potosí despenaliza el aborto, y sigue creciendo la tendencia en México". Associated Press (in Spanish). 7 November 2024.
  71. "Sinaloa Congress decriminalizes abortion". Mexico News Daily. 9 March 2022. Retrieved 14 March 2022.
  72. "El estado mexicano de Veracruz despenaliza el aborto". Agencia EFE (in Spanish). 20 July 2021.
  73. "Text of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women". www.un.org. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
  74. "Information Series On Sexual And Reproductive Health And Right- Abortion" (PDF). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 September 2015. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
  75. IWHC (30 November 2018). "United Nations Human Rights Committee Defends Women and Girls' Right to Life". International Women's Health Coalition. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
  76. "Fact Sheet" (PDF). United Nations. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 March 2012. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
  77. "Mexico-Factsheet" (PDF). International Justice Research Center. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 November 2019. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
  78. "Mexico's Supreme Court rules that abortion is not a crime". AP NEWS. 7 September 2021. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
  79. 1 2 3 4 5 Grupo de Información en Reproducción Elegida. "Cifras del aborto en México". Archived from the original on 17 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  80. 1 2 3 4 Montalvo, Tania (24 April 2013). "Una de cada 3 mujeres que interrumpe su embarazo en el DF es ama de casa". CNN: Mexico. Retrieved 16 March 2014.
  81. 1 2 Grupo de Informacion en Reproduccion Elegida. "Aborto: Capitulo Uno" (PDF). GIRE. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  82. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ford, Allison (2010). "MEXICO CITY LEGALIZES ABORTION". Law and Business Review of the Americas. 16 (1): 119–127. Retrieved 30 March 2014.
  83. Wilson, Kate S.; Sandra G. Garcia; Cudia Diaz Olvarrieta; Aremic Villalobos-Hernandez; Jorge Valencia Rodriguez; Patricio Sanhueza Smith; Courtney Burks (September 2011). "Public Opinion on Abortion in Mexico City after the Landmark Reform". Studies in Family Planning. 42 (3): 175–182. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2011.00279.x. JSTOR   41310727. PMID   21972670.
  84. 1 2 Schiavon, Rafael; Maria E. Collado; Erika Troncoso; Jose E. Soto Sanchez; Gabriela Otero Zorrilla; Tia Palermo (November 2010). "Characteristics of private abortion services in Mexico City after legalization". Reproductive Health Matters. 18 (36): 127–135. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(10)36530-X . JSTOR   25767368. PMID   21111357. S2CID   15771389.
  85. Cevallos, Diego (22 May 2009). "Avalanche of Anti-Abortion Laws". Inter Press Service. Archived from the original on 26 July 2009. Retrieved 18 October 2009.
  86. Henshaw, Stanley (1 January 1999). "The Incidence of abortion Worldwide". International Family Planning Perspectives. Archived from the original on 11 May 2010. Retrieved 15 April 2010.
  87. Malkin, Elisabeth; Cattan, Nacha (24 August 2008). "Mexico City Struggles With Law on Abortion". The New York Times. p. A5. Retrieved 6 February 2011.
  88. Amuchástegui, Ana (2013). "Body and embodiment in the experience of abortion for Mexican women: the sexual body, the fertile body, and the body of abortion". Gender, Sexuality & Feminism. 1 (1). doi: 10.3998/gsf.12220332.0001.101 .
  89. Malcolm Moore; Jerry McDermott (26 April 2007). "Catholics to appeal Mexico City's abortion law" . Retrieved 16 March 2014.
  90. "Women should decide whether to legalize abortion, Mexican president says". Reuters. 31 December 2020. Retrieved 1 January 2021.
  91. Kitroeff, Natalie; Lopez, Oscar (7 September 2021). "Mexico's Supreme Court Votes to Decriminalize Abortion". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 22 September 2021.
  92. Wilson, Kate S.; García SG; Díaz Olavarrieta C; Villalobos-Hernández A; Rodríguez JV; Smith PS; Burks C. (September 2011). "Public opinion on abortion in Mexico City after the landmark reform". Studies in Family Planning. 42 (3): 175–182. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2011.00279.x. PMID   21972670.
  93. 1 2 ELISABETH MALKIN; NACHA CATTAN (24 August 2008). "Mexico City Struggles With Law on Abortion". New York Times. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  94. Tobar, Hector (3 November 2007). "In Mexico, abortion is out from shadows". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
  95. "Mexico Deeply Divided on Social Issues [usurped] ." (July 5, 2005). Angus Reid Global Monitor. Retrieved June 20, 2007.
  96. "Mexicans Support Status Quo on Social Issues [usurped] ." (December 1, 2005). Angus Reid Global Monitor. Retrieved January 10, 2006.
  97. "Mexicans Support Birth Control, Not Abortion [usurped] ." (March 28, 2007). Angus Reid Global Monitor. Retrieved June 20, 2007.
  98. "Urban-Rural Abortion Divide Evident in Mexico [usurped] ." (April 15, 2007). Angus Reid Global Monitor. Retrieved June 20, 2007.
  99. "Derecho al aborto divide al país: 53% en contra; 45% a favor". El Financiero (in Spanish). 8 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  100. "ENCUESTA: Derecho al aborto divide al país: 53% en contra; 45% a favor". Nación321 (in Spanish). 8 September 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.
  101. "Support for abortion jumped in Mexico last year, survey finds". Reuters. 11 January 2021. Retrieved 11 September 2021.

Further reading