Aglais io

Last updated

European peacock
Peacock butterfly (inachis io) 2.jpg
On blackthorn at Otmoor, Oxfordshire, England
Peacock butterfly (Inachis io) underside.jpg
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Family: Nymphalidae
Genus: Aglais
Species:
A. io
Binomial name
Aglais io
Subspecies
Synonyms [2]
List
  • Inachis io(Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Inachis nigrolimbataVerity, 1950
  • Inachis oligoioReuss, 1939
  • Nymphalis antigoneFischer de Waldheim
  • Nymphalis belisariaOberthür, 1889
  • Nymphalis fischeriStandfuss
  • Nymphalis griseocellataLempke, 1956
  • Nymphalis io(Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Nymphalis ioidesOchsenheimer, 1807
  • Nymphalis sardoaStaudinger, 1871
  • Papilio ioLinnaeus, 1758 [1]
  • Papilio ioidesOchsenheimer, 1807
  • Vanessa astridaDerenne-Meyers, 1926
  • Vanessa basi-obscuraReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa bimaculataTempel, 1924
  • Vanessa calorefactaUrich, 1897
  • Vanessa cyanostictaRaynor, 1903
  • Vanessa dyophthalmicaGarbini, 1883
  • Vanessa exmaculataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa exoculataWeymer, 1878
  • Vanessa extremaFischer de Waldheim, 1898
  • Vanessa fulvaOudemans, 1905
  • Vanessa hackrayiCabeau, 1925
  • Vanessa io(Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Vanessa io subsp. ioides(Ochsenheimer, 1807)
  • Vanessa ireneaPrüffer, 1921
  • Vanessa jo(Linnaeus, 1758)
  • Vanessa jocasteUrich, 1897
  • Vanessa lacteusBandermann, 1935
  • Vanessa lucidocellataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa magnimaculataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa marginalisReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa marginimaculata-obscuraReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa meilhaniFrémont, 1926
  • Vanessa mesoidesReuss, 1910
  • Vanessa mesoides-brunneaReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa mesoides-claraReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa mesoides-lucidocellataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa mesoides-parvimaculataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa mesoides-sibiricaReuss, 1922
  • Vanessa mesoides-splendensReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa mesoides-viridiocellataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa narsesSchultz, 1899
  • Vanessa nigrifasciataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa nigriocellataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa nigromaculataKleinschmidt, 1929
  • Vanessa pallensKnoch, 1927
  • Vanessa pallidaTutt, 1896
  • Vanessa parvimaculataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa pavoStichel, 1902
  • Vanessa prochnoviPronin, 1928
  • Vanessa silaceusBandermann, 1935
  • Vanessa teloides-brunneaReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa teloides-claraReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa teloides-lucidocellataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa teloides-nigrifasciataReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa teloides-splendensReuss, 1911
  • Vanessa transparensBeuret, 1926

Aglais io, the European peacock, [3] [4] [5] or the peacock butterfly, is a colourful butterfly, found in Europe and temperate Asia as far east as Japan. It was formerly classified as the only member of the genus Inachis (the name is derived from Greek mythology, meaning Io, the daughter of Inachus [ citation needed ]). It should not be confused or classified with the "American peacocks" in the genus Anartia ; while belonging to the same family as the European peacock, Nymphalidae, the American peacocks are not close relatives of the Eurasian species. The peacock butterfly is resident in much of its range, often wintering in buildings or trees. It therefore often appears quite early in spring. The peacock butterfly has figured in research in which the role of eyespots as an anti-predator mechanism has been investigated. [6] The peacock is expanding its range [3] [7] and is not known to be threatened. [7]

Contents

Characteristics

The butterfly has a wingspan of 50 to 55 millimetres (2 to 2+18 in). The base colour of the wings is a rusty red, and at each wingtip it bears a distinctive, black, blue and yellow eyespot. The underside is a cryptically coloured dark brown or black.

There are two subspecies: A. io caucasica (Jachontov, 1912), found in Azerbaijan, and A. io geisha (Stichel, 1908), found in Japan and the Russian Far East.

Natural history

The peacock can be found in woods, fields, meadows, pastures, parks, and gardens, from lowlands up to 2,500 metres (8,200 ft) elevation. It is a relatively common butterfly, seen in many European parks and gardens. The peacock male exhibits territorial behaviour, in many cases territories being selected en route of the females to oviposition sites. [8]

The butterfly hibernates over winter before laying its eggs in early spring, in batches of up to 400 at a time. [3] The olive green eggs are ribbed. They are laid on both the upper parts and the undersides of leaves of nettle plants [9] and hops. The caterpillars hatch after about a week. They are shiny black with six rows of barbed spikes and a series of white dots on each segment. The chrysalis may be either grey, brown or green, and may have a blackish tinge. [9] The caterpillars grow up to 42 millimetres (1+58 in) in length.

The recorded food plants of the European peacock are stinging nettle (Urtica dioica), hop (Humulus lupulus), and the small nettle (Urtica urens). [3]

The adult butterflies drink nectar from a wide variety of flowering plants, including buddleia, willows, dandelions, wild marjoram, danewort, hemp agrimony, and clover; they also use tree sap and rotten fruits.

Behaviour

Mating system and territorial behaviour

Aglais io employs a monogamous mating system, which means that they only mate with one partner for a period of time.[ citation needed ] This is due to their life cycle in which females are receptive only during an eclosion period, after overwintering. The pairs only mate once after overwintering, as it is very difficult to find a receptive female after that period. [10] In species where the range of the females is not defensible by a male, the males must defend a single desirable area that females will come through, such as dense food areas, watering holes, or favourable nesting sites. The males then attempt to mate with the females as they are passing through.

Holding a desirable territory increases the male's likelihood of finding a mate and therefore increases his reproductive success. However, each individual needs to weigh the benefits of mating with the costs of defending a territory. [11] Aglais io exhibits this type of territorial behaviour, and must defend a desirable territory from other males. If only one of the males knows the territory well, he will successfully chase off any intruders. On the other hand, if both males are familiar with the territory, there will be a contest between the two to determine which of them stays in the territory. The most desirable sites are those that will increase the male's quota of females. These sites are generally feeding and oviposition sites, which are sought after by females. This territorial behaviour is reinforced by the fact that these sites are all concentrated. If the valuable resources were dispersed, there would be less observable territorial behaviour. [12]

To find mates and defend their territory, Aglais io exhibits perching behaviour. The male butterflies will perch on an object at a specific height where they can observe passing flying objects. Every time they see a passing object of their own species or of a relevant species, they will fly straight towards the object until they are approximately 10 cm away. If they encounter a male, the resident male will chase him off his territory. If the resident male encounters a female, he will pursue her until she lands and mating will occur. [13] The courtship is extended in this species. The male goes through a long chase before the female allows him to mate. He must demonstrate high performance flight. [14]

The monandrous mating system has caused the evolution of a shorter life span in males of this species. In polygynous butterflies, the male's reproductive success is largely dependent on life span. Therefore, the longer a male lives, the more he can reproduce, so he has a higher fitness. Therefore, males tend to live as long as the females. In A. io the synchronous eclosion at the end of winter cause males to only mate once. Their reproductive success is therefore not linked to how long they live, and there is no selective pressure to live longer. Therefore, the life span of males is shorter than the lifespan of the females. [10]

Anti-predator defense mechanisms

Like many other butterflies that hibernate, the peacock butterfly exhibits many anti-predator defence mechanisms against would-be predators. The peacock butterfly's most obvious defense comes from the four large eyespots that it has on its wings. It also uses camouflage and can emit a hissing sound. [15]

The eyespots are brilliantly coloured concentric circles. Avian predators of the butterfly include blue tits, pied flycatchers and other small passerine birds. The first line of defence against these predators for many hibernating butterflies is crypsis, a process in which the butterflies blend into their environment by mimicking a leaf and staying immobile. [16] Some hibernating butterflies such as the peacock have a second line of defence: when attacked, they open their wings and expose their eyespots in an intimidating threat display, which gives the butterfly a much better chance at escaping predators than butterflies that rely solely on leaf mimicry. [16] While the main targets of these anti-predation measures are small passerine birds, even larger birds such as chickens have been shown to react to the stimuli and avoid the butterfly when exposed to eyespots. [17]

Avian predators

Research has shown that avian predators attempting to attack a butterfly hesitate for a much longer time if they encounter butterflies that display their eyespots than if they encounter butterflies whose eyespots are covered. In addition, the predators delay their return to the butterfly if it displays eyespots [17] [18] and some predators even flee before attacking the butterfly. [18] By intimidating the predator so that it delays or gives up its attack, the peacock butterfly has a much greater chance of escaping predation.

According to the eye mimicry hypothesis, the eyespots serve an anti-predatory purpose by imitating the eyes of the avian predators' natural enemies. [17] In contrast, the conspicuousness hypothesis posits that rather than recognition of the eyespots as belonging to an enemy, the conspicuous nature of the eyespots, which are typically large and bright, causes a response in the visual system of the predator that leads to avoidance of the butterfly. [19]

In one experiment, observed responses of the avian predators to the eyespots included increased vigilance, a delay in their return to the peacock butterfly, and the production of alarm calls associated with ground-based predators. [17] These responses to the eyespot stimuli lend support to the eye mimicry hypothesis as they indicated that the avian predator sensed that the eyespots belonged to a potential enemy. When faced with avian predators like the blue tit, the peacock butterfly makes a hissing noise as well as threateningly displaying its eyespots. However, it is the eyespots that protect the butterfly the most; peacock butterflies that have had their sound production capability removed still defend themselves extremely well against avian predators if their eyespots are present. [20]

Rodent predators

While hibernating in dark wintering areas, the peacock butterfly frequently encounters rodent predators such as small mice. Against these predators, however, the visual display of eyespots is ineffective due to the darkness of the environment. Instead, these rodent predators show a much stronger adverse reaction to the butterfly when it produces its auditory hissing signal. This indicates that for rodent predators, it is the auditory signal produced by the butterfly that serves as a deterrent. [15]

Etymology

Io is a figure in Greek mythology. She was a priestess of Hera in Argos.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peafowl</span> Group of large game birds

Peafowl is a common name for two bird species of the genus Pavo and one species of the closely related genus Afropavo within the tribe Pavonini of the family Phasianidae. Male peafowl are referred to as peacocks, and female peafowl are referred to as peahens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mimicry</span> Imitation of another species for selective advantage

In evolutionary biology, mimicry is an evolved resemblance between an organism and another object, often an organism of another species. Mimicry may evolve between different species, or between individuals of the same species. Often, mimicry functions to protect a species from predators, making it an anti-predator adaptation. Mimicry evolves if a receiver perceives the similarity between a mimic and a model and as a result changes its behaviour in a way that provides a selective advantage to the mimic. The resemblances that evolve in mimicry can be visual, acoustic, chemical, tactile, or electric, or combinations of these sensory modalities. Mimicry may be to the advantage of both organisms that share a resemblance, in which case it is a form of mutualism; or mimicry can be to the detriment of one, making it parasitic or competitive. The evolutionary convergence between groups is driven by the selective action of a signal-receiver or dupe. Birds, for example, use sight to identify palatable insects and butterflies, whilst avoiding the noxious ones. Over time, palatable insects may evolve to resemble noxious ones, making them mimics and the noxious ones models. In the case of mutualism, sometimes both groups are referred to as "co-mimics". It is often thought that models must be more abundant than mimics, but this is not so. Mimicry may involve numerous species; many harmless species such as hoverflies are Batesian mimics of strongly defended species such as wasps, while many such well-defended species form Müllerian mimicry rings, all resembling each other. Mimicry between prey species and their predators often involves three or more species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lek mating</span> Type of animal mating behaviour

A lek is an aggregation of male animals gathered to engage in competitive displays and courtship rituals, known as lekking, to entice visiting females which are surveying prospective partners with which to mate. A lek can also indicate an available plot of space able to be utilized by displaying males to defend their own share of territory for the breeding season. A lekking species is characterised by male displays, strong female mate choice, and the conferring of indirect benefits to males and reduced costs to females. Although most prevalent among birds such as black grouse, lekking is also found in a wide range of vertebrates including some bony fish, amphibians, reptiles, and mammals, and arthropods including crustaceans and insects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Small tortoiseshell</span> Species of butterfly in the family Nymphalidae

The small tortoiseshell is a colourful Eurasian butterfly in the family Nymphalidae. Adults feed on nectar and may hibernate over winter; in warmer climates they may have two broods in a season. While the dorsal surface of the wings is vividly marked, the ventral surface is drab, providing camouflage. Eggs are laid on the common nettle, on which the larvae feed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Behavioral ecology</span> Study of the evolutionary basis for animal behavior due to ecological pressures

Behavioral ecology, also spelled behavioural ecology, is the study of the evolutionary basis for animal behavior due to ecological pressures. Behavioral ecology emerged from ethology after Niko Tinbergen outlined four questions to address when studying animal behaviors: What are the proximate causes, ontogeny, survival value, and phylogeny of a behavior?

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brood parasitism</span> Animal reliance on other individuals to raise its young

Brood parasitism is a subclass of parasitism and phenomenon and behavioural pattern of certain animals, brood parasites, that rely on others to raise their young. The strategy appears among birds, insects and fish. The brood parasite manipulates a host, either of the same or of another species, to raise its young as if it were its own, usually using egg mimicry, with eggs that resemble the host's.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Speckled wood (butterfly)</span> Species of butterfly in the family Nymphalidae

The speckled wood is a butterfly found in and on the borders of woodland areas throughout much of the Palearctic realm. The species is subdivided into multiple subspecies, including Pararge aegeria aegeria, Pararge aegeria tircis, Pararge aegeria oblita, and Pararge aegeria insula. The color of this butterfly varies between subspecies. The existence of these subspecies is due to variation in morphology down a gradient corresponding to a geographic cline. The background of the wings ranges from brown to orange, and the spots are either pale yellow, white, cream, or a tawny orange. The speckled wood feeds on a variety of grass species. The males of this species exhibit two types of mate locating behaviors: territorial defense and patrolling. The proportion of males exhibiting these two strategies changes based on ecological conditions. The monandrous female must choose which type of male can help her reproduce successfully. Her decision is heavily influenced by environmental conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Small heath (butterfly)</span> Species of butterfly

The small heath is a butterfly species belonging to the family Nymphalidae, classified within the subfamily Satyrinae. It is the smallest butterfly in this subfamily. The small heath is diurnal and flies with a noticeable fluttering flight pattern near the ground. It rests with closed wings when not in flight. It is widespread in colonies throughout the grasslands of Eurasia and north-western Africa, preferring drier habitats than other Coenonympha, such as salt marshes, alpine meadows, wetlands, and grasslands near water. However, habitat loss caused by human activities has led to a decline in populations in some locations.

<i>Gonepteryx rhamni</i> Species of butterfly

Gonepteryx rhamni, commonly named the common brimstone, is a butterfly of the family Pieridae. It lives throughout the Palearctic zone and is commonly found across Europe, Asia, and North Africa. Across much of its range, it is the only species of its genus, and is therefore simply known locally as the brimstone. Its wing span size is 60–74 mm (2.4–2.9 in). It should not be confused with the brimstone moth Opisthograptis luteolata.

<i>Polygonia c-album</i> Species of butterfly

Polygonia c-album, the comma, is a food generalist (polyphagous) butterfly species belonging to the family Nymphalidae. The angular notches on the edges of the forewings are characteristic of the genus Polygonia, which is why species in the genus are commonly referred to as anglewing butterflies. Comma butterflies can be identified by their prominent orange and dark brown/black dorsal wings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Owl butterfly</span> Members of brush-footed butterfly genus Caligo

The owl butterflies are species of the genus Caligo and are known for their huge eyespots, which resemble owls' eyes. They are found in the rainforests and secondary forests of Mexico, Central and South America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grayling (butterfly)</span> Species of butterfly

The grayling or rock grayling is a species in the brush-footed butterfly family Nymphalidae. Although found all over Europe, the grayling mostly inhabits coastal areas, with inland populations declining significantly in recent years. The grayling lives in dry and warm habitats with easy access to the sun, which helps them with body temperature regulation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aposematism</span> Honest signalling of an animals powerful defences

Aposematism is the advertising by an animal, whether terrestrial or marine, to potential predators that it is not worth attacking or eating. This unprofitability may consist of any defenses which make the prey difficult to kill and eat, such as toxicity, venom, foul taste or smell, sharp spines, or aggressive nature. These advertising signals may take the form of conspicuous coloration, sounds, odours, or other perceivable characteristics. Aposematic signals are beneficial for both predator and prey, since both avoid potential harm.

<i>Limenitis arthemis</i> Species of butterfly

Limenitis arthemis, the red-spotted purple or white admiral, is a North American butterfly species in the cosmopolitan genus Limenitis. It has been studied for its evolution of mimicry, and for the several stable hybrid wing patterns within this nominal species; it is one of the most dramatic examples of hybridization between non-mimetic and mimetic populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eyespot (mimicry)</span> Eye-like marking used for mimicry or distraction

An eyespot is an eye-like marking. They are found in butterflies, reptiles, cats, birds and fish.

A biological ornament is a characteristic of an animal that appears to serve a decorative function rather than a utilitarian function. Many are secondary sexual characteristics, and others appear on young birds during the period when they are dependent on being fed by their parents. Ornaments are used in displays to attract mates, which may lead to the evolutionary process known as sexual selection. An animal may shake, lengthen, or spread out its ornament in order to get the attention of the opposite sex, which will in turn choose the most attractive one with which to mate. Ornaments are most often observed in males, and choosing an extravagantly ornamented male benefits females as the genes that produce the ornament will be passed on to her offspring, increasing their own reproductive fitness. As Ronald Fisher noted, the male offspring will inherit the ornament while the female offspring will inherit the preference for said ornament, which can lead to a positive feedback loop known as a Fisherian runaway. These structures serve as cues to animal sexual behaviour, that is, they are sensory signals that affect mating responses. Therefore, ornamental traits are often selected by mate choice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deimatic behaviour</span> Bluffing display of an animal used to startle or scare a predator

Deimatic behaviour or startle display means any pattern of bluffing behaviour in an animal that lacks strong defences, such as suddenly displaying conspicuous eyespots, to scare off or momentarily distract a predator, thus giving the prey animal an opportunity to escape. The term deimatic or dymantic originates from the Greek δειματόω (deimatóo), meaning "to frighten".

Deception in animals is the transmission of misinformation by one animal to another, of the same or different species, in a way that propagates beliefs that are not true.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual selection in birds</span>

Sexual selection in birds concerns how birds have evolved a variety of mating behaviors, with the peacock tail being perhaps the most famous example of sexual selection and the Fisherian runaway. Commonly occurring sexual dimorphisms such as size and color differences are energetically costly attributes that signal competitive breeding situations. Many types of avian sexual selection have been identified; intersexual selection, also known as female choice; and intrasexual competition, where individuals of the more abundant sex compete with each other for the privilege to mate. Sexually selected traits often evolve to become more pronounced in competitive breeding situations until the trait begins to limit the individual's fitness. Conflicts between an individual fitness and signaling adaptations ensure that sexually selected ornaments such as plumage coloration and courtship behavior are "honest" traits. Signals must be costly to ensure that only good-quality individuals can present these exaggerated sexual ornaments and behaviors.

In ecology, contest competition refers to a situation where available resources, such as food and mates, are utilized only by one or a few individuals, thus preventing development or reproduction of other individuals. It refers to a hypothetical situation in which several individuals stage a contest for which one eventually emerges victorious. Contest competition is the opposite of scramble competition, a situation in which available resources are shared equally among individuals.

References

  1. 1 2 Linnaeus, Carl; Salvius, Lars (1758). Caroli Linnaei...Systema naturae per regna tria naturae :secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (pdf) (in Latin). Holmiae : Impensis Direct. Laurentii Salvii. p. 472. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.542. OCLC   499504699 . Retrieved 15 March 2018.
  2. "Aglais io (Linnaeus, 1758)". Global Biodiversity Information Facility . Retrieved 26 February 2024.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Eeles, Peter. "Peacock - Aglais io". UK Butterflies. Retrieved 11 November 2010.
  4. Aglais io, Moths and Butterflies of Europe and North Africa
  5. The higher classification of Nymphalidae Archived 2009-02-20 at the Wayback Machine , Nymphalidae.net
  6. Stevens, Martin (2005). "The role of eyespots as anti-predator mechanisms, principally demonstrated in the Lepidoptera". Biological Reviews. 80 (4): 573–588. doi:10.1017/S1464793105006810. PMID   16221330. S2CID   24868603. (Abstract)
  7. 1 2 "Peacock". A-Z of Butterflies. Butterfly Conservation. Archived from the original on 16 November 2010. Retrieved 13 November 2010.
  8. Price, Peter W. (1997). Insect ecology (3rd (illustrated) ed.). John Wiley. p. 405. ISBN   9780471161844 . Retrieved 11 November 2010.
  9. 1 2 Stokoe, W.J. (1966). The Observers Book of Butterflies. The Observer's Books (Fully illustrated ed.). London: Frederick Warne & Co. p. 191.
  10. 1 2 Wiklund, Christer; Karl Gotthard; Sören Nylin (2003). "Mating system and the evolution of sex-specific mortality rates in two nymphalid butterflies". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 270 (1526): 1823–1828. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2437. ISSN   0962-8452. PMC   1691446 . PMID   12964985.
  11. Davies, N., Krebs, J., & West, S. (2012). An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology. (4th ed.). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN   9781444339499.
  12. R. R. Baker (1972). "Territorial behaviour of the nymphalid butterflies, Aglais urticae (L.) and Inachis io (L.)". Journal of Animal Ecology. 41 (2): 453–469. Bibcode:1972JAnEc..41..453B. doi:10.2307/3480. JSTOR   3480.
  13. Scott, J. A. (1974). "Mate-locating behavior of butterflies". American Midland Naturalist. 91 (1): 103–117. doi:10.2307/2424514. JSTOR   2424514.
  14. Bergman, Martin; Karl Gotthard; David Berger; Martin Olofsson; Darrell J. Kemp; Christer Wiklund (2007). "Mating success of resident versus non-resident males in a territorial butterfly". Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 274 (1618): 1659–1665. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0311. ISSN   0962-8452. PMC   1914333 . PMID   17472909.
  15. 1 2 Martin Olofsson; Sven Jakobsson; Christer Wiklund (2012). "Auditory Defence in the Peacock Butterfly (Inachis io) against Mice (Apodemus flavicollis and A. sylvaticus)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 66 (2): 209–15. doi:10.1007/s00265-011-1268-1. S2CID   18172201.
  16. 1 2 Adrian Vallin; Sven Jakobsson; Johan Lind; Christer Wiklund (2006). "Crypsis versus Intimidation: Anti-Predation Defence in Three Closely Related Butterflies" (PDF). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 59 (3): 455–459. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0069-9. S2CID   20742464. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-07-12. Retrieved 2016-01-24.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Martin Olofsson; Hanne Løvlie; Jessika Tiblin; Sven Jakobsson; Christer Wiklund (2012). "Eyespot Display in the Peacock Butterfly Triggers Antipredator Behaviors in Naïve Adult Fowl". Behavioral Ecology. 24 (1): 305–10. doi:10.1093/beheco/ars167. PMC   3518204 . PMID   23243378.
  18. 1 2 S. Merilaita; A. Vallin; U. Kodandaramaiah; M. Dimitrova; S. Ruuskanen; T. Laaksonen (2011). "Number of Eyespots and Their Intimidating Effect on Naive Predators in the Peacock Butterfly". Behavioral Ecology. 22 (6): 1326–331. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arr135 .
  19. M. Stevens; C. J. Hardman; C. L. Stubbins (2008). "Conspicuousness, Not Eye Mimicry, Makes "eyespots" Effective Antipredator Signals". Behavioral Ecology. 19 (3): 525–31. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arm162 .
  20. A. Vallin; S. Jakobsson; J. Lind; C. Wiklund (2005). "Prey Survival by Predator Intimidation: An Experimental Study of Peacock Butterfly Defence against Blue Tits". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 272 (1569): 1203–207. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3034. PMC   1564111 . PMID   16024383.