Antarctic land bridge

Last updated
The positions of South America, Antarctica, and Australia near the end of the land bridge's existence. The yellow arrows show the distribution of ocean currents before and after the breakup of the land bridge (forming the ACC in the second). The red arrows show the diverging plates of South America and Australia. Eocene-Paleocene-circumpolar.svg
The positions of South America, Antarctica, and Australia near the end of the land bridge's existence. The yellow arrows show the distribution of ocean currents before and after the breakup of the land bridge (forming the ACC in the second). The red arrows show the diverging plates of South America and Australia.

The Antarctic land bridge was a land bridge connecting the continents of South America, Antarctica, and Australia that existed from the Late Cretaceous to the Late Eocene. The land bridge consisted of the entire continent of Antarctica (at the time unglaciated), as well as much narrower, now-submerged landforms that connected Antarctica to both South America and Australia (with the land bridge between South America and Antarctica sometimes called the Weddellian Isthmus or the Isthmus of Scotia [1] [2] ). At its greatest extent, the Antarctic land bridge allowed for a terrestrial connection between South America and Australia, allowing numerous animals and plants to disperse across both continents using it. [3]

Contents

The Antarctic land bridge came to an end during the Late Eocene or Early Oligocene, when the formation of both the Drake Passage and Tasmanian Passage cut off any further land connections of either continent with Antarctica. These openings also created the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, which eventually led to the glaciation of Antarctica, making the continent largely inhospitable to any terrestrial life. Signals of the Antarctic land bridge's influence are still present in both the genetics and distribution of many modern animals and plants. [3]

History

As components of the supercontinent Gondwana, the continents of Antarctica, South America, and Australia were connected to each other for much of the Mesozoic. However, the supercontinent started to rapidly fragment from the Early Cretaceous onwards. By the time of the Late Cretaceous (96 Ma), a shallow seaway had started to develop between Australia and Antarctica, with only a narrow strip along the South Tasman Rise, joined to Wilkes Land, still connecting both continents. Evidence of dinosaurs dispersing between the continents has been inferred from the Australian sauropod Diamantinasaurus , which closely resembles the South American Sarmientosaurus , suggesting that a common ancestor of both dispersed across Antarctica. [4] [5] [6] Australia and Antarctica finally broke apart around 45 million years ago, and the South Tasman Rise was likely already submerged by water a few million years prior to this point, forming the Tasmanian Passage. However, a steady circumpolar likely did not form between the continents until 30 million years ago. [3]

Meanwhile, the tip of South America stayed closely connected to the Antarctic Peninsula via exposed parts of the Scotia Plate, with both starting to gradually separate starting from 50 million years ago. [7] Continued seafloor spreading along the Scotia Ridge eventually separated both continents by 28 million years ago, forming the Drake Passage. [3]

Thus, a narrow connection between South America, Antarctica, and Australia existed between ~96 to 50 million years ago, and South America and Antarctica (but not Australia) remained connected up to 28 million years ago. The breakup of these three continents can be considered the final step in the fragmentation of Gondwana. [7] The narrower landforms that connected both continents to Antarctica may have been contiguous land during the Cretaceous, but by the Cenozoic, they had most likely turned into island chains (first separated by freshwater lakes, then shallow seas as ocean basins formed) that terrestrial organisms would have needed to island-hop across. [3]

Paleoecology

The term "Amphi-Pacific distribution" is used for taxa that have a distribution consisting of southern South America and Australia. [3]

Taxa whose evolutionary history was influenced by the Antarctic land bridge include: [3]

Vertebrates

Invertebrates

Plants

See also

References

  1. Defler, Thomas (2019), "An Antarctic Mammalian Community" , History of Terrestrial Mammals in South America, Topics in Geobiology, vol. 42, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 185–198, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98449-0_9, ISBN   978-3-319-98448-3 , retrieved 2025-06-03
  2. Yanbin, Shen (June 1998). "A paleoisthmus linking southern South America with the Antarctic Peninsula during Late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary" . Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences. 41 (3): 225–229. Bibcode:1998ScChD..41..225Y. doi:10.1007/BF02973108. ISSN   1006-9313.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 van den Ende, Conrad; White, Lloyd T.; van Welzen, Peter C. (2017-04-01). "The existence and break-up of the Antarctic land bridge as indicated by both amphi-Pacific distributions and tectonics" . Gondwana Research. 44: 219–227. Bibcode:2017GondR..44..219V. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2016.12.006. ISSN   1342-937X.
  4. Poropat, Stephen F.; Upchurch, Paul; Mannion, Philip D.; Hocknull, Scott A.; Kear, Benjamin P.; Sloan, Trish; Sinapius, George H. K.; Elliott, David A. (2015-04-01). "Revision of the sauropod dinosaur Diamantinasaurus matildae Hocknull et al. 2009 from the mid-Cretaceous of Australia: Implications for Gondwanan titanosauriform dispersal". Gondwana Research. 27 (3): 995–1033. Bibcode:2015GondR..27..995P. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2014.03.014. hdl: 1959.3/435265 . ISSN   1342-937X.
  5. Poropat, Stephen F.; Mannion, Philip D.; Rigby, Samantha L.; Duncan, Ruairidh J.; Pentland, Adele H.; Bevitt, Joseph J.; Sloan, Trish; Elliott, David A. (2023-04-12). "A nearly complete skull of the sauropod dinosaur Diamantinasaurus matildae from the Upper Cretaceous Winton Formation of Australia and implications for the early evolution of titanosaurs". Royal Society Open Science. 10 (4): 221618. Bibcode:2023RSOS...1021618P. doi:10.1098/rsos.221618. PMC   10090887 . PMID   37063988.
  6. Pare, Sascha (2023-04-17). "95 million-year-old land bridge across Antarctica carried dinosaurs between continents". livescience.com. Retrieved 2025-03-25.
  7. 1 2 van den Ende, Conrad; White, Lloyd T.; van Welzen, Peter C. (2017-04-01). "The existence and break-up of the Antarctic land bridge as indicated by both amphi-Pacific distributions and tectonics" . Gondwana Research. 44: 219–227. Bibcode:2017GondR..44..219V. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2016.12.006. ISSN   1342-937X.
  8. Chimento, Nicolás R.; Agnolín, Federico L.; Manabe, Makoto; Tsuihiji, Takanobu; Rich, Thomas H.; Vickers-Rich, Patricia; Novas, Fernando E. (2023-02-16). "First monotreme from the Late Cretaceous of South America". Communications Biology. 6 (1): 146. doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04498-7. ISSN   2399-3642. PMC   9935847 . PMID   36797304.
  9. Goin, F. J.; Woodburne, M. O.; Zimicz, A. N.; Martin, G. M.; Chornogubsky, L. (16 October 2015). A Brief History of South American Metatherians: Evolutionary Contexts and Intercontinental Dispersals. Springer. p. 216. ISBN   978-94-017-7420-8.
  10. 1 2 Feng, Yan-Jie; Blackburn, David C.; Liang, Dan; Hillis, David M.; Wake, David B.; Cannatella, David C.; Zhang, Peng (2017-07-18). "Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114 (29): E5864 –E5870. Bibcode:2017PNAS..114E5864F. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704632114 . PMC   5530686 . PMID   28673970.
  11. Mörs, Thomas; Reguero, Marcelo; Vasilyan, Davit (2020-04-23). "First fossil frog from Antarctica: implications for Eocene high latitude climate conditions and Gondwanan cosmopolitanism of Australobatrachia". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 5051. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.5051M. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61973-5. hdl: 11336/136224 . ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   7181706 . PMID   32327670.
  12. Arratia, Gloria; Quezada-Romegialli, Claudio (2019-04-25). "The South American and Australian percichthyids and perciliids. What is new about them?". Neotropical Ichthyology. 17: e180102. doi: 10.1590/1982-0224-20180102 . ISSN   1679-6225.