Automated journalism

Last updated

Automated journalism, also known as algorithmic journalism or robot journalism, [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] is a term that attempts to describe modern technological processes that have infiltrated the journalistic profession, such as news articles generated by computer programs. [3] [6] There are four main fields of application for automated journalism, namely automated content production, Data Mining, news dissemination and content optimization. [7] Through artificial intelligence (AI) software, stories are produced automatically by computers rather than human reporters. These programs interpret, organize, and present data in human-readable ways. Typically, the process involves an algorithm that scans large amounts of provided data, selects from an assortment of pre-programmed article structures, orders key points, and inserts details such as names, places, amounts, rankings, statistics, and other figures. [6] The output can also be customized to fit a certain voice, tone, or style. [2] [3] [6]

Contents

Data science and AI companies such as Automated Insights, Narrative Science, United Robots and Monok develop and provide these algorithms to news outlets. [6] [8] [9] [10] As of 2016, only a few media organizations have used automated journalism. Early adopters include news providers such as the Associated Press, Forbes, ProPublica, and the Los Angeles Times. [3]

Early implementations were mainly used for stories based on statistics and numerical figures. Common topics include sports recaps, [11] weather, financial reports, real estate analysis, and earnings reviews. [3] StatSheet, an online platform covering college basketball, runs entirely on an automated program. [6] The Associated Press began using automation to cover 10,000 minor baseball leagues games annually, using a program from Automated Insights and statistics from MLB Advanced Media. [12] Outside of sports, the Associated Press also uses automation to produce stories on corporate earnings. [6] In 2006, Thomson Reuters announced their switch to automation to generate financial news stories on its online news platform. [13] More famously, an algorithm called Quakebot published a story about a 2014 California earthquake on The Los Angeles Times website within three minutes after the shaking had stopped. [6] [8]

Automated journalism is sometimes seen as an opportunity to free journalists from routine reporting, providing them with more time for complex tasks. It also allows efficiency and cost-cutting, alleviating some financial burden that many news organizations face. However, automated journalism is also perceived as a threat to the authorship and quality of news and a threat to the livelihoods of human journalists. [2] [3]

Benefits

Speed

Robot reporters are built to produce large quantities of information at quicker speeds. The Associated Press announced that their use of automation has increased the volume of earnings reports from customers by more than ten times. With software from Automated Insights and data from other companies, they can produce 150 to 300-word articles in the same time it takes journalists to crunch numbers and prepare information. [6] By automating routine stories and tasks, journalists are promised more time for complex jobs such as investigative reporting and in-depth analysis of events. [2] [3]

Francesco Marconi [14] of the Associated Press stated that, through automation, the news agency freed up 20 percent [15] of reporters’ time to focus on higher-impact projects.

Cost

Automated journalism is cheaper because more content can be produced within less time. It also lowers labour costs for news organizations. Reduced human input means less expenses on wages or salaries, paid leaves, vacations, and employment insurance. Automation serves as a cost-cutting tool for news outlets struggling with tight budgets but still wish to maintain the scope and quality of their coverage. [3] [13]

Criticisms

Authorship

In an automated story, there is often confusion about who should be credited as the author. Several participants of a study on algorithmic authorship [3] attributed the credit to the programmer; others perceived the news organization as the author, emphasizing the collaborative nature of the work. There is also no way for the reader to verify whether an article was written by a robot or human, which raises issues of transparency although such issues also arise with respect to authorship attribution between human authors too. [3] [16] In a certain cases of human-based inattention, the service phrases of AI-based software emerges in the final publication. For example, the phrase "Certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic:" appeared in the Introduction part of the published chemical paper. [17]

Credibility and quality

Concerns about the perceived credibility of automated news is similar to concerns about the perceived credibility of news in general. Critics doubt if algorithms are "fair and accurate, free from subjectivity, error, or attempted influence." [18] Again, these issues about fairness, accuracy, subjectivity, error, and attempts at influence or propaganda has also been present in articles written by humans over thousands of years. A common criticism is that machines do not replace human capabilities such as creativity, humour, and critical-thinking. However, as the technology evolves, the aim is to mimic human characteristics. When the UK's Guardian newspaper used an AI to write an entire article in September 2020, commentators pointed out that the AI still relied on human editorial content. Austin Tanney, the head of AI at Kainos said: "The Guardian got three or four different articles and spliced them together. They also gave it the opening paragraph. It doesn’t belittle what it is. It was written by AI, but there was human editorial on that." [3] [16] [19]

Beyond human evaluation, there are now numerous algorithmic methods to identify machine written articles [20] although some articles may still contain errors that are obvious for a human to identify, they can at times score better with these automatic identifiers than human-written articles. [21]

Employment

Among the concerns about automation is the loss of employment for journalists as publishers switch to using AIs. [3] [6] [22] The use of automation has become a near necessity in newsrooms nowadays, in order to keep up with the ever-increasing demand for news stories, which in turn has affected the very nature of the journalistic profession. [7] In 2014, an annual census from The American Society of News Editors announced that the newspaper industry lost 3,800 full-time, professional editors. [23] Falling by more than 10% within a year, this is the biggest drop since the industry cut over 10,000 jobs in 2007 and 2008. [23] [24]

And also the agency's research and development team established the "cyber newsroom," as Jamie Austin dubbed it, in January 2016 with the goal of automating every step of the news production process, including searching, categorization, editing, and distribution. Ten machine learning algorithms that operate in four phases that match the various steps in the creation of a news item handle everything in real time and without the need for human intervention. [25]

Dependence on platform and technology companies

There has been a significant amount of recent scholarship on the relationship between platform companies, such as Google and Facebook, and the news industry with researchers examining the impact of these platforms on the distribution and monetization of news content, as well as the implications for journalism and democracy. [26] [27] [28] Some scholars have extended this line of thinking to automated journalism and the use of AI in the news. A 2022 paper by the Oxford University academic Felix Simon, for example, argues that the concentration of AI tools and infrastructure in the hands of a few major technology companies, such as Google, Microsoft, and Amazon Web Services, is a significant issue for the news industry, as it risks shifting more control to these companies and increasing the industry's dependence on them. [29] Simon argues that this could lead to vendor lock-in, where news organizations become structurally dependent on AI provided by these companies and are unable to switch to another vendor without incurring significant costs. The companies also possess artefactual and contractual control [30] over their AI infrastructure and services, which could expose news organizations to the risk of unforeseen changes or the stopping of their AI solutions entirely. Additionally, the author argues the reliance on these companies for AI can make it more difficult for news organizations to understand the decisions or predictions made by the systems and can limit their ability to protect sources or proprietary business information.

Opinions on automated journalism

A 2017 Nieman Reports article by Nicola Bruno [31] discusses whether or not machines will replace journalists and addresses concerns around the concept of automated journalism practices. Ultimately, Bruno came to the conclusion that AI would assist journalists, not replace them. "No automated software or amateur reporter will ever replace a good journalist", she said.

In 2020, however, Microsoft did just that - replacing 27 journalists with AI. One staff member was quoted by The Guardian as saying: “I spend all my time reading about how automation and AI is going to take all our jobs, and here I am – AI has taken my job.” The journalist went on to say that replacing humans with software was risky, as existing staff were careful to stick to “very strict editorial guidelines” which ensured that users were not presented with violent or inappropriate content when opening their browser, for example. [32]

List of implementations

Related Research Articles

Artificial intelligence (AI), in its broadest sense, is intelligence exhibited by machines, particularly computer systems, as opposed to the natural intelligence of living beings. As a field of research in computer science focusing on the automation of intelligent behavior through machine learning, it develops and studies methods and software which enable machines to perceive their environment and take actions that maximize their chances of achieving defined goals, with the aim of performing tasks typically associated with human intelligence. Such machines may be called AIs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Automation</span> Use of various control systems for operating equipment

Automation describes a wide range of technologies that reduce human intervention in processes, mainly by predetermining decision criteria, subprocess relationships, and related actions, as well as embodying those predeterminations in machines. Automation has been achieved by various means including mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, electrical, electronic devices, and computers, usually in combination. Complicated systems, such as modern factories, airplanes, and ships typically use combinations of all of these techniques. The benefit of automation includes labor savings, reducing waste, savings in electricity costs, savings in material costs, and improvements to quality, accuracy, and precision.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AI takeover</span> Hypothetical artificial intelligence scenario

An AI takeover is a scenario in which artificial intelligence (AI) becomes the dominant form of intelligence on Earth, as computer programs or robots effectively take control of the planet away from the human species. Possible scenarios include replacement of the entire human workforce due to automation, takeover by a superintelligent AI, and the popular notion of a robot uprising. Stories of AI takeovers are popular throughout science fiction. Some public figures, such as Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk, have advocated research into precautionary measures to ensure future superintelligent machines remain under human control.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital journalism</span> Editorial content published via the Internet

Digital journalism, also known as netizen journalism or online journalism, is a contemporary form of journalism where editorial content is distributed via the Internet, as opposed to publishing via print or broadcast. What constitutes digital journalism is debated by scholars; however, the primary product of journalism, which is news and features on current affairs, is presented solely or in combination as text, audio, video, or some interactive forms like storytelling stories or newsgames, and disseminated through digital media technology.

The ethics of artificial intelligence is the branch of the ethics of technology specific to artificial intelligence (AI) systems.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been used in applications throughout industry and academia. Similar to electricity or computers, AI serves as a general-purpose technology that has numerous applications. Its applications span language translation, image recognition, credit scoring, e-commerce and various other domains.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Technological unemployment</span> Unemployment caused by technological change

Technological unemployment is the loss of jobs caused by technological change. It is a key type of structural unemployment. Technological change typically includes the introduction of labour-saving "mechanical-muscle" machines or more efficient "mechanical-mind" processes (automation), and humans' role in these processes are minimized. Just as horses were gradually made obsolete as transport by the automobile and as labourer by the tractor, humans' jobs have also been affected throughout modern history. Historical examples include artisan weavers reduced to poverty after the introduction of mechanized looms. During World War II, Alan Turing's bombe machine compressed and decoded thousands of man-years worth of encrypted data in a matter of hours. A contemporary example of technological unemployment is the displacement of retail cashiers by self-service tills and cashierless stores.

Machine ethics is a part of the ethics of artificial intelligence concerned with adding or ensuring moral behaviors of man-made machines that use artificial intelligence, otherwise known as artificial intelligent agents. Machine ethics differs from other ethical fields related to engineering and technology. Machine ethics should not be confused with computer ethics, which focuses on human use of computers. It should also be distinguished from the philosophy of technology, which concerns itself with the grander social effects of technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Automated Insights</span>

Automated Insights ("Ai") is an American-based technology company that specializes in natural language generation (NLG) software that turns big data into readable narratives.

Algorithmic transparency is the principle that the factors that influence the decisions made by algorithms should be visible, or transparent, to the people who use, regulate, and are affected by systems that employ those algorithms. Although the phrase was coined in 2016 by Nicholas Diakopoulos and Michael Koliska about the role of algorithms in deciding the content of digital journalism services, the underlying principle dates back to the 1970s and the rise of automated systems for scoring consumer credit.

Lawbots are a broad class of customer-facing legal AI applications that are used to automate specific legal tasks, such as document automation and legal research. The terms robot lawyer and lawyer bot are used as synonyms to lawbot. A robot lawyer or a robo-lawyer refers to a legal AI application that can perform tasks that are typically done by paralegals or young associates at law firms. However, there is some debate on the correctness of the term. Some commentators say that legal AI is technically speaking neither a lawyer nor a robot and should not be referred to as such. Other commentators believe that the term can be misleading and note that the robot lawyer of the future won't be one all-encompassing application but a collection of specialized bots for various tasks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meredith Broussard</span> Data journalism professor

Meredith Broussard is a data journalism professor at the Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute at New York University. Her research focuses on the role of artificial intelligence in journalism.

Government by algorithm is an alternative form of government or social ordering where the usage of computer algorithms is applied to regulations, law enforcement, and generally any aspect of everyday life such as transportation or land registration. The term "government by algorithm" has appeared in academic literature as an alternative for "algorithmic governance" in 2013. A related term, algorithmic regulation, is defined as setting the standard, monitoring and modifying behaviour by means of computational algorithms – automation of judiciary is in its scope. In the context of blockchain, it is also known as blockchain governance.

Regulation of algorithms, or algorithmic regulation, is the creation of laws, rules and public sector policies for promotion and regulation of algorithms, particularly in artificial intelligence and machine learning. For the subset of AI algorithms, the term regulation of artificial intelligence is used. The regulatory and policy landscape for artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging issue in jurisdictions globally, including in the European Union. Regulation of AI is considered necessary to both encourage AI and manage associated risks, but challenging. Another emerging topic is the regulation of blockchain algorithms and is mentioned along with regulation of AI algorithms. Many countries have enacted regulations of high frequency trades, which is shifting due to technological progress into the realm of AI algorithms.

The regulation of artificial intelligence is the development of public sector policies and laws for promoting and regulating artificial intelligence (AI); it is therefore related to the broader regulation of algorithms. The regulatory and policy landscape for AI is an emerging issue in jurisdictions globally, including in the European Union and in supra-national bodies like the IEEE, OECD and others. Since 2016, a wave of AI ethics guidelines have been published in order to maintain social control over the technology. Regulation is considered necessary to both encourage AI and manage associated risks. In addition to regulation, AI-deploying organizations need to play a central role in creating and deploying trustworthy AI in line with the principles of trustworthy AI, and take accountability to mitigate the risks. Regulation of AI through mechanisms such as review boards can also be seen as social means to approach the AI control problem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Workplace impact of artificial intelligence</span> Impact of artificial intelligence on workers

The impact of artificial intelligence on workers includes both applications to improve worker safety and health, and potential hazards that must be controlled.

Artificial intelligence (AI) in hiring involves the use of technology to automate aspects of the hiring process. Advances in artificial intelligence, such as the advent of machine learning and the growth of big data, enable AI to be utilized to recruit, screen, and predict the success of applicants. Proponents of artificial intelligence in hiring claim it reduces bias, assists with finding qualified candidates, and frees up human resource workers' time for other tasks, while opponents worry that AI perpetuates inequalities in the workplace and will eliminate jobs. Despite the potential benefits, the ethical implications of AI in hiring remain a subject of debate, with concerns about algorithmic transparency, accountability, and the need for ongoing oversight to ensure fair and unbiased decision-making throughout the recruitment process.

Automated decision-making (ADM) involves the use of data, machines and algorithms to make decisions in a range of contexts, including public administration, business, health, education, law, employment, transport, media and entertainment, with varying degrees of human oversight or intervention. ADM involves large-scale data from a range of sources, such as databases, text, social media, sensors, images or speech, that is processed using various technologies including computer software, algorithms, machine learning, natural language processing, artificial intelligence, augmented intelligence and robotics. The increasing use of automated decision-making systems (ADMS) across a range of contexts presents many benefits and challenges to human society requiring consideration of the technical, legal, ethical, societal, educational, economic and health consequences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Midjourney</span> Image-generating machine learning model

Midjourney is a generative artificial intelligence program and service created and hosted by the San Francisco–based independent research lab Midjourney, Inc. Midjourney generates images from natural language descriptions, called prompts, similar to OpenAI's DALL-E and Stability AI's Stable Diffusion. It is one of the technologies of the AI boom.

AI-assisted virtualization software is a type of technology that combines the principles of virtualization with advanced artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. This fusion is designed to allow more efficient, dynamic, and intelligent management of virtual environments and resources. This novel technology has been employed in a range of industries, including cloud computing, healthcare, data centers, and network infrastructure, to optimize performance, resource allocation, and security protocols.

References

  1. ↑ Graefe, Andreas (January 7, 2016). Guide to Automated Journalism. New York City: Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved February 14, 2018.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Dörr, Konstantin Nicholas (2016-08-17). "Mapping the field of Algorithmic Journalism" (PDF). Digital Journalism. 4 (6): 700–722. doi:10.1080/21670811.2015.1096748. ISSN   2167-0811. S2CID   58477721.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Montal, Tal; Reich, Zvi (2016-08-05). "I, Robot. You, Journalist. Who is the Author?". Digital Journalism. 5 (7): 829–849. doi:10.1080/21670811.2016.1209083. ISSN   2167-0811. S2CID   151614065.
  4. ↑ Trapova, Alina; Mezei, Péter (2022). "Robojournalism – A Copyright Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the European News Industry". GRUR International . 71 (7): 589–602. doi: 10.1093/grurint/ikac038 .
  5. ↑ Gondwe, Gregory (2023). "Exploring the Multifaceted Nature of Generative AI in Journalism Studies: A Typology of Scholarly Definitions". SSRN Electronic Journal . doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4465446 .
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Cohen, Nicole S. (2015-04-03). "From Pink Slips to Pink Slime: Transforming Media Labor in a Digital Age". The Communication Review. 18 (2): 98–122. doi:10.1080/10714421.2015.1031996. ISSN   1071-4421. S2CID   146768332.
  7. 1 2 Kotenidis, Efthimis; Veglis, Andreas (June 2021). "Algorithmic Journalism—Current Applications and Future Perspectives". Journalism and Media. 2 (2): 244–257. doi: 10.3390/journalmedia2020014 . ISSN   2673-5172.
  8. 1 2 Carlson, Matt (2015-05-04). "The Robotic Reporter". Digital Journalism. 3 (3): 416–431. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.976412. ISSN   2167-0811. S2CID   143327230.
  9. ↑ Southern, Lucinda (2019-02-12). "Robot writers drove 1,000 paying subscribers for Swedish publisher MittMedia". Digiday. Retrieved 2019-02-19.
  10. ↑ "AI-powered journalism: A time-saver or an accident waiting to happen?". American Press Institute. 12 November 2019. Retrieved 30 April 2021.
  11. ↑ Galily, Yair (2018). "Artificial intelligence and sports journalism: Is it a sweeping change?". Technology in Society. 54: 47–51. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.03.001.
  12. ↑ Mullin, Benjamin (June 30, 2016). "The Associated Press will use automated writing to cover the minor leagues". The Poynter Institute. Retrieved April 19, 2017.
  13. 1 2 Dalen, Arjen van (2012-10-01). "The Algorithms Behind the Headlines". Journalism Practice. 6 (5–6): 648–658. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.667268. ISSN   1751-2786.
  14. ↑ "The Associated Press Uses AI To Boost Content And Video Volume | AdExchanger". AdExchanger. 2018-02-20. Retrieved 2018-04-05.
  15. ↑ "The Washington Post's robot reporter has published 850 articles in the past year". Digiday . 2017-09-14. Retrieved 2018-04-05.
  16. 1 2 Dörr, Konstantin Nicholas; Hollnbuchner, Katharina (2017-04-21). "Ethical Challenges of Algorithmic Journalism". Digital Journalism. 5 (4): 404–419. doi:10.1080/21670811.2016.1167612. ISSN   2167-0811. S2CID   31667318.
  17. ↑ Zhang, Manshu; Wu, Liming; Yang, Tao; Zhu, Bing; Liu, Yangai (2024-03-01). "The three-dimensional porous mesh structure of Cu-based metal-organic-framework - aramid cellulose separator enhances the electrochemical performance of lithium metal anode batteries". Surfaces and Interfaces. 46: 104081. doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2024.104081. ISSN   2468-0230.
  18. ↑ Gillespie, Tarleton (2014-02-28), "The Relevance of Algorithms", Media Technologies, The MIT Press, pp. 167–194, doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009, ISBN   978-0-262-52537-4, S2CID   123401265
  19. ↑ Niamh Campbell (12 October 2020). "Is Artificial Intelligence the Future of Journalism?". Sync NI.
  20. ↑ Gehrmann, Sebastian (2019), GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Text, arXiv: 1906.04043 , Bibcode:2019arXiv190604043G
  21. ↑ Belz, Anya (2019), Fully Automatic Journalism: We Need to Talk About Nonfake News Generation (PDF), University of Brighton, retrieved 2020-02-01
  22. ↑ Caswell, David; Dörr, Konstantin (2017-05-09). "Automated Journalism 2.0: Event-driven narratives" (PDF). Journalism Practice. 12 (4): 477–496. doi:10.1080/17512786.2017.1320773. ISSN   1751-2786. S2CID   57746143.
  23. 1 2 Edmonds, Rick (July 28, 2015). "Newspaper industry lost 3,800 full-time editorial professionals in 2014". The Poynter Institute. Retrieved April 20, 2017.
  24. ↑ Thurman, Neil; Dörr, Konstantin; Kunert, Jessica (2017-03-01). "When Reporters Get Hands-on with Robo-Writing" (PDF). Digital Journalism. 5 (10): 1240–1259. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1289819. ISSN   2167-0811. S2CID   55367290.
  25. ↑ Ufarte-Ruiz, Marí-a-José; Murcia-Verdú, Francisco-José; Túñez-López, José-Miguel (2023-03-01). "Use of artificial intelligence in synthetic media: first newsrooms without journalists". Profesional de la información / Information Professional (in Spanish). 32 (2). doi: 10.3145/epi.2023.mar.03 . ISSN   1699-2407.
  26. ↑ Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis; Ganter, Sarah Anne (2022-07-08). The Power of Platforms: Shaping Media and Society. Oxford Studies in Digital Politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-090886-7.
  27. ↑ Moore, Martin; Tambini, Damian; Moore, Martin; Tambini, Damian, eds. (2018-07-26). Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-084512-4.
  28. ↑ Chua, Sherwin; Duffy, Andrew (2019-12-17). "Friend, Foe or Frenemy? Traditional Journalism Actors' Changing Attitudes towards Peripheral Players and Their Innovations". Media and Communication. 7 (4): 112–122. doi: 10.17645/mac.v7i4.2275 . hdl: 10356/138193 . ISSN   2183-2439.
  29. ↑ Simon, Felix M. (2022-11-26). "Uneasy Bedfellows: AI in the News, Platform Companies and the Issue of Journalistic Autonomy". Digital Journalism. 10 (10): 1832–1854. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2022.2063150 . ISSN   2167-0811.
  30. ↑ Kenney, Martin; Bearson, Dafna; Zysman, John (October 2021). "The platform economy matures: measuring pervasiveness and exploring power". Socio-Economic Review. 19 (4): 1451–1483. doi:10.1093/ser/mwab014.
  31. ↑ "Will Machines Replace Journalists?". niemanreports.org. Retrieved 2017-04-21.
  32. ↑ Jim Waterson (30 May 2020). "Microsoft Sacks Journalists To Replace Them With Robots". The Guardian.
  33. ↑ "Microsoft sacks journalists to replace them with robots". The Guardian. 30 May 2020.
  34. ↑ "Microsoft 'to replace journalists with robots'". BBC News. 30 May 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  35. ↑ "Microsoft is cutting dozens of MSN news production workers and replacing them with artificial intelligence". The Seattle Times. 29 May 2020.
  36. ↑ GPT-3 (8 September 2020). "A robot wrote this entire article. Are you scared yet, human?". The Guardian.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.