DWWR 4

Last updated

DW&WR 4
Type and origin
Power typeSteam
DesignerGrierson
Builder Kitson & Co.
Serial number3686/7
Build date1897 [1]
Total produced2
Rebuilder Grand Canal Street
Rebuild date1908
Specifications
Configuration:
   Whyte
Gauge 5 ft 3 in (1,600 mm)
Driver dia.4 ft 9 in (1,450 mm)
Trailing dia. (not known)
Length33 ft (10,000 mm) (est.)
Loco weight47 long tons (48 t)
Water cap.2,000 imp gal (9,100 L; 2,400 US gal)
Boiler pressure160 lbf/in2 (1.10 MPa)
Cylinders 2
Cylinder size 18+12 in × 26 in (470 mm × 660 mm) [2]
Performance figures
Tractive effort 21,230  lbf (94.44  kN)
Career
Operators [1]
Class J1 (Inchicore)
Power classC/E
Number in class2
Numbers
  • 4, 5
  • 448, 449 (GSR)
LocaleIreland
Withdrawn1950
DispositionBoth scrapped
Figures are following rebuild to 0-6-0 in 1908 [3]

Dublin, Wicklow and Wexford Railway (DW&WR) 4 and 5 were a pair of 0-6-2T tank locomotives purchased from Kitson & Co. in 1897 and rebuilt as 0-6-0 tender Locomotives in 1908 due to a tendency to derail. Renumbered by Great Southern Railways to 448 and 449 they survived until 1940 and 1950 respectively.

Contents

History

Background

Thomas Grierson rose to become Chief Engineer of the DW&WR in 1894/95 taking combined responsibility for both the civil and mechanical sides of the operation, these roles being separate before his tenure and were to again be separated after he left in May 1897. [4] [lower-alpha 1] Grierson was a civil engineer and decisions and views he held were to be questioned. He is understood to have held the theory that tenders were less economic than tank engines due to the need to haul around the weight of the tender. [3] [lower-alpha 2] . The error of ordering Express passenger 4-4-0s and the selection and issues with this class seem to have sullied Grierson's reputation.

Shepherd and Beesley suggested the DW&WR had identified a need for additional goods and tank locomotives in March 1896, with the construction of the extension to Waterford and the haulage of heavy goods from New Ross to Palace East being major considerations. [4]

Design and Procurement

To satisfy motive powers requirements Grierson ordered two 0-6-2 T locomotives from Kitson & Co. for £2,575 each in April 1896. [4] [lower-alpha 3] Their design were based on the eight Class A delivered to the Lancashire, Derbyshire and East Coast Railway from 1895, [lower-alpha 4] with the Rhondda and Swansea Bay Railway also acquiring some of the type. [4]

With hindsight Shepherd and Beesley classified the order as "Grierson's Folly". [5]

Service as 0-6-2T

In the event by the time they arrived in April 1897, Grierson was on the cusp of departure and Robert Cronin about to take over as Locomotive Superintendent. [4] These locomotives, No. 4 Lismore and No. 5 Clonmel , were found to have problems by exceeding the maximum axle load and having issues with hot-running axle boxes. [3] They were also prone to derailments, caused by the excess weight on the trailing axle. Following a derailment at North Wall yard| in June 1897 a weighing at the Great Southern and Western Railway Inchicore Railway Works showed the weights of the locomotives to be 64 long tons 8 cwt (144,300 lb or 65.4 t) and 64 long tons 0 cwt (143,400 lb or 65 t) respectively, far in excess of the 60 long tons 13 cwt (135,900 lb or 61.6 t) that had been specified to Kitson by Grierson. [4] They were subsequently allocated to Harcourt Street. [4]

Rebuild and service as 0-6-0

After the short period of only eleven years in 1908 Cronin rebuilt the locomotives as 0-6-0 tender engines with Belpaire boilers, the new tenders being built by the Grand Canal Street railway works. The rebuild produced engines of strong power however they were noted for very high coal and water consumption and a tendency to stall on the gradient if the boiler pressure dropped. There was usually no trouble restarting once the boiler pressure had been regained. [3] They were based at Bray and used on cattle specials and goods trains to Shillelagh. [4]

On the merger of the railways in Ireland to Great Southern Railways in 1925 these locomotives became allocated class 448 with numbers 448 and 449. No. 4/448 was withdrawn in 1940. No. 5/449 survived the nationalisation to CIÉ in 1945 and in an assessment in 1948 the rating of the class was "quite good". That did not seem to stop No. 5/449 being withdrawn in 1950. [3] [lower-alpha 5]

Engine number 4/448 had a couple of other milestones. It was the last locomotive to be rebuilt at Grand Canal Street and was the final locomotive to retain Dublin and South Eastern Railway (DSER) livery until being painted GSR grey in 1930. [3]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">L&YR Class 5</span> Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway 2-4-2T passenger tank locomotive introduced in 1889

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Class 5 were 2-4-2T steam locomotives designed by Chief Mechanical Engineer (CME) John Aspinall and introduced from 1889 for local passenger work. Later batches included progressive modifications such as extended coal bunkers and Belpaire fireboxes. The final batch built from 1911 to 1914 under George Hughes incorporating superheated boilers gave increased tractive effort, others were also rebuilt to this standard. When Hughes introduced his classification system in 1919, the more powerful superheated locomotives were designated Class 6. The final examples were withdrawn in 1961.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">0-8-4T</span> Tank locomotive wheel arrangement

Under the Whyte notation for the classification of steam locomotives, 0-8-4 represents the wheel arrangement of no leading wheels, eight powered and coupled driving wheels on four axles, and four trailing wheels on two axles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dublin and Kingstown Railway</span> Irelands first passenger railway (1834–1856)

The Dublin and Kingstown Railway (D&KR), which opened in 1834, was Ireland's first passenger railway. It linked Westland Row in Dublin with Kingstown Harbour in County Dublin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GS&WR Class 101</span> Irish steam locomotive

The GS&WR Class 101, classified as Class 101 or Class J15 by the Great Southern Railways, was a class of 0-6-0 steam locomotives designed for working goods traffic although they did, and were quite capable of, working branch and secondary passenger trains.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MGWR Class A</span> Midland Great Western Railway of Ireland express passenger 4-4-0 locomotive introduced in 1902

The Midland Great Western Railway (MGWR) A Class, later Inchicore Class D5, consisted of 6 4-4-0 express passenger locomotives built at Broadstone Works in the period 1902-1905. The largest express passenger locomotive in Ireland for a short while after introduction they were used on the MGWR's flagship services to Galway with most surviving until the 1950s albeit on less prestigious work.

The Great Southern Railways (GSR) Class 700 consisted of five 0-6-0 locomotives built by Inchicore railway works in 1929 and were the last locomotives designed by J. R. Bazin. The Class 710 consisted of ten 0-6-0 locomotives built by Inchicore railway works in 1934.

The Great Southern and Western Railway (GS&WR) Class 900 consisted of a pair of 4-8-0T locomotives designed by E.A. Watson and introduced in 1915 and 1924 as a heavy shunter and banker for use on the relatively severe gradient from Kingsbridge to Clondalkin.

The Great Southern and Western Railway (GS&WR) Class 351 initially consisted of four 0-6-0 tender locomotives designed by Robert Coey for use on heavy freight trains on the main line. They were joined by four similar locomotives built in 1912 introduced by Richard Maunsell, these had detail differences such as larger cabs and higher running plates. They included an extended smokebox to which a Phoenix superheater was briefly trialed but abandoned. They were initially designated GS&WR Class 249 but were subsequently grouped into class 351.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GS&WR Class 368</span> Class of 4 Irish 2-6-0 locomotives

The Great Southern and Western Railway (GS&WR) Class 368 consisted of four 2-6-0 tender locomotives designed by Robert Coey for use on heavy freight trains. on the main line.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DSER 20</span> Irish class of locomotive

The DSER 20 class was a class of three 4-4-2T locomotives operated by the Dublin and South Eastern Railway and later the Great Southern Railways and CIÉ.

Dublin, Wicklow and Wexford Railway (DW&WR) 52 to 54 were a class of three 4-4-2T locomotives designed by William Wakefield for Kingstown Pier to Kingsbridge boat trains. At one point they carried the names Duke of Connaught, Duke of Abercorn and Duke of Leinster respectively.

Dublin, Wicklow and Wexford Railway (DW&WR) 11 built in 1896 was the predecessor to a total of twelve 2-4-2T locomotives to emerge from Grand Canal Street railway works between 1896 and 1910. Eleven of twelve lasted through to the early 1950s, the only loss being due to the Civil war, and despite attempts to replace them remained they remained vital to the running of the South Dublin services suburban services to Bray throughout their lives.

The Dublin, Wicklow and Wexford Railway (DW&WR) 2, built in 1885, was the predecessor to a total of eleven 2-4-0T locomotives to emerge from Grand Canal Street railway works between 1885 and 1896.

Dublin, Wicklow and Wexford Railway (DW&WR) 24 was the lead engine of a class of five 2-4-0 tender locomotives built in two batches in 1864 and 1873.

Dublin, Wicklow and Wexford Railway (DW&WR) 13 was an 0-6-0 goods locomotive built in 1904 at Grand Canal Street railway works and was followed by four more of the same class, two being contracted to Beyer, Peacock and Company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DWWR 55</span> Irish locomotive class

Dublin, Wicklow and Wexford Railway (DW&WR) 55 to 58 were 4-4-0 locomotives built from 1895 at Vulcan Foundry for express passenger duties on the Dublin—Wexford mainline. They were to remain the DW&WR's and subsequent Dublin and South Eastern Railway's leading express passenger locomotive until the arrival of Nos. 67 and 68 some ten years later.

Dublin, Wicklow and Wexford Railway (DW&WR) 50 and 51 were two 0-6-0 tender locomotives built in 1891 at Vulcan Works and were named Arklow and New Ross respectively. These were the first the 0-6-0 wheel configuration to be purchased by the DW&WR. The DW&WR's own Grand Canal Street were to construct two more in 1899/1900 and to follow that with a design for five more from 1904. The DW&WR became the Dublin and South Eastern Railway (DSER) from the end of 1906. Under the locomotive engineer R. Cronin both engines were rebuilt with Belpaire boilers in 1912 and 1915 respectively and the boiler pressure increased to 160 lb.

The Dublin, Wicklow and Wexford Railway (DW&WR) Ariel Class refers to seven 2-2-2WT well tank locomotives built by Neilson and Company and introduced in 1865.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GS&WR Class 37</span> Class of 6 Irish 4-4-2T locomotives

The Great Southern and Western Railway (GS&WR) Class 37 consisted of six 4-4-2T tank engines. The first two built by locomotive superintendent Henry Ivatt (Snr.) were based on a previous 2-4-0T design by McDonnell, as were some 2-4-2Ts Ivatt produced two years earlier for the Kerry branches.

The Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway (L&YR) Barton Wright 0-6-2T were tank engines introduced by Barton Wright between 1877 and 1883. This was the first use of the 0-6-2T type in Britain.

References

Notes

  1. Shepherd and Beesley comment that for most companies who combined these roles the result was generally not successful. [4]
  2. This was different from more conventional thinking that tank engines are generally better for short trips, suburban and branch line work while tender engines are better suited to longer main line trips with their higher water capacity and possibly better running at speed
  3. Ahrons indicated he had no idea what purpose these particular pair of engines were ordered for. [2]
  4. A follow on batch of 15 were diverted to the Hull and Barnsley Railway in 1899 as Class F1 due to non-payment issues
  5. Being the single member of class and therefore non-standard would have been a factor in consideration of withdrawal

Footnotes

Sources