Extreme mass ratio inspiral

Last updated
Artist impression of the spacetime generated by an extreme mass ratio inspiral. ExtremeMassRatioInspiral.jpg
Artist impression of the spacetime generated by an extreme mass ratio inspiral.

In astrophysics, an extreme mass ratio inspiral (EMRI) is the orbit of a relatively light object around a much heavier (by a factor 10,000 or more) object, that gradually spirals in due to the emission of gravitational waves. Such systems are likely to be found in the centers of galaxies, where stellar mass compact objects, such as stellar black holes and neutron stars, may be found orbiting a supermassive black hole. [1] [2] [3] In the case of a black hole in orbit around another black hole this is an extreme mass ratio binary black hole. The term EMRI is sometimes used as a shorthand to denote the emitted gravitational waveform as well as the orbit itself.

Contents

The main reason for scientific interest in EMRIs is that they are one of the most promising sources for gravitational wave astronomy using future space-based detectors such as the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). [4] If such signals are successfully detected, they will allow accurate measurements of the mass and angular momentum of the central object, which in turn gives crucial input for models for the formation and evolution of supermassive black holes. [5] Moreover, the gravitational wave signal provides a detailed map of the spacetime geometry surrounding the central object, allowing unprecedented tests of the predictions of general relativity in the strong gravity regime. [6]

Overview

Scientific potential

Characteristic strain of EMRI signals as a function of frequency. They lie in the sensitive band for space-borne detectors like LISA or eLISA, but outside the band for ground-based detectors like advanced LIGO (aLIGO) or pulsar timing arrays such as the European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA). EMRI characteristic strain.png
Characteristic strain of EMRI signals as a function of frequency. They lie in the sensitive band for space-borne detectors like LISA or eLISA, but outside the band for ground-based detectors like advanced LIGO (aLIGO) or pulsar timing arrays such as the European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA).

If successfully detected, the gravitational wave signal from an EMRI will carry a wealth of astrophysical data. EMRIs evolve slowly and complete many (~10,000) cycles before eventually plunging. [8] Therefore, the gravitational wave signal encodes a precise map of the spacetime geometry of the supermassive black hole. [9] Consequently, the signal can be used as an accurate test of the predictions of general relativity in the regime of strong gravity; a regime in which general relativity is completely untested. In particular, it is possible to test the hypothesis that the central object is indeed a supermassive black hole to high accuracy by measuring the quadrupole moment of the gravitational field to an accuracy of a fraction of a percent. [1]

In addition, each observation of an EMRI system will allow an accurate determination of the parameters of the system, including: [10]

Formation

It is currently thought that the centers of most (large) galaxies consist of a supermassive black hole of 106 to 109 solar masses (M☉) surrounded by a cluster of 107 to 108 stars maybe 10 light-years across, called the nucleus. [5] The orbits of the objects around the central supermassive black hole are continually perturbed by two-body interactions with other objects in the nucleus, changing the shape of the orbit. Occasionally, an object may pass close enough to the central supermassive black hole for its orbit to produce large amounts of gravitational waves, significantly affecting the orbit. Under specific conditions such an orbit may become an EMRI. [5]

In order to become an EMRI, the back-reaction from the emission of gravitational waves must be the dominant correction to the orbit (compared to, for example, two-body interactions). This requires that the orbiting objects passes very close the central supermassive black hole. A consequence of this is that the inspiralling object cannot be a large heavy star, because it will be ripped apart by the tidal forces. [5]

However, if the object passes too close to the central supermassive black hole, it will make a direct plunge across the event horizon. This will produce a brief violent burst of gravitational radiation which would be hard to detect with currently planned observatories. [nb 1] Consequently, the creation of EMRI requires a fine balance between objects passing too close and too far from the central supermassive black hole. Currently, the best estimates are that a typical supermassive black hole of 106  M☉, will capture an EMRI once every 106 to 108 years. This makes witnessing such an event in our Milky Way unlikely. However, a space based gravitational wave observatory like LISA will be able to detect EMRI events up to cosmological distances, leading to an expected detection rate somewhere between a few and a few thousand per year. [1]

Extreme mass ratio inspirals created in this way tend to have very large eccentricities (e > 0.9999). The initial, high eccentricity orbits may also be a source of gravitational waves, emitting a short burst as the compact object passes through periapsis. These gravitational wave signals are known as extreme mass ratio bursts. [14] As the orbit shrinks due to the emission of gravitational waves, it becomes more circular. When it has shrunk enough for the gravitational waves to become strong and frequent enough to be continuously detectable by LISA, the eccentricity will typically be around 0.7. Since the distribution of objects in the nucleus is expected to be approximately spherically symmetric, there is expected to be no correlation between the initial plane of the inspiral and the spin of the central supermassive black holes. [1]

In 2011, an impediment to the formation of EMRIs was proposed. [15] The "Schwarzschild Barrier" was thought to be an upper limit to the eccentricity of orbits near a supermassive black hole. Gravitational scattering would drive by torques from the slightly asymmetric distribution of mass in the nucleus ("resonant relaxation"), resulting in a random walk in each star's eccentricity. [16] When its eccentricity would become sufficiently large, the orbit would begin to undergo relativistic precession, and the effectiveness of the torques would be quenched. It was believed that there would be a critical eccentricity, at each value of the semi-major axis, at which stars would be "reflected" back to lower eccentricities. However, it is now clear that this barrier is nothing but an illusion, probably originating from an animation based on numerical simulations, as described in detail in two works. [17] [18]

The role of the spin

It was realised that the role of the spin of the central supermassive black hole in the formation and evolution of EMRIs is crucial. [19] For a long time it has been believed that any EMRI originating farther away than a certain critical radius of about a hundredth of a parsec would be either scattered away from the capture orbit or directly plunge into the supermassive black hole on an extremely radial orbit. These events would lead to one or a few bursts, but not to a coherent set of thousands of them. Indeed, when taking into account the spin, [19] proved that these capture orbits accumulate thousands of cycles in the detector band. Since they are driven by two-body relaxation, which is chaotic in nature, they are ignorant of anything related to a potential Schwarzchild barrier. Moreover, since they originate in the bulk of the stellar distribution, the rates are larger. Additionally, due to their larger eccentricity, they are louder, which enhances the detection volume. It is therefore expected that EMRIs originate at these distances, and that they dominate the rates. [2]

Alternatives

Several alternative processes for the production of extreme mass ratio inspirals are known. One possibility would be for the central supermassive black hole to capture a passing object that is not bound to it. However, the window where the object passes close enough to the central black hole to be captured, but far enough to avoid plunging directly into it is extremely small, making it unlikely that such event contribute significantly to the expected event rate. [1]

Another possibility is present if the compact object occurs in a bound binary system with another object. If such a system passes close enough to the central supermassive black hole it is separated by the tidal forces, ejecting one of the objects from the nucleus at a high velocity while the other is captured by the central black hole with a relatively high probability of becoming an EMRI. If more than 1% of the compact objects in the nucleus is found in binaries this process may compete with the "standard" picture described above. EMRIs produced by this process typically have a low eccentricity, becoming very nearly circular by the time they are detectable by LISA. [1]

A third option is that a giant star passes close enough to the central massive black hole for the outer layers to be stripped away by tidal forces, after which the remaining core may become an EMRI. However, it is uncertain if the coupling between the core and outer layers of giant stars is strong enough for stripping to have a significant enough effect on the orbit of the core. [1]

Finally, supermassive black holes are often accompanied by an accretion disc of matter spiraling towards the black hole. If this disc contains enough matter, instabilities can collapse to form new stars. If massive enough, these can collapse to form compact objects, which are automatically on a trajectory to become an EMRI. Extreme mass ratio inspirals created in this way are characterized by the fact their orbital plane is strongly correlated with the plane of the accretion disc and the spin of the supermassive black hole. [1]

Intermediate mass ratio inspirals

Besides stellar black holes and supermassive black holes, it is speculated that a third class of intermediate mass black holes with masses between 102 and 104 M☉ also exists. [5] One way that these may possibly form is through a runway series of collisions of stars in a young cluster of stars. If such a cluster forms within a thousand light years from the galactic nucleus, it will sink towards the center due to dynamical friction. Once close enough the stars are stripped away through tidal forces and the intermediate mass black hole may continue on an inspiral towards the central supermassive black hole. Such a system with a mass ratio around 1000 is known as an intermediate mass ratio inspiral (IMRI). [3] [20] There are many uncertainties in the expected frequency for such events, but some calculations suggest there may be up to several tens of these events detectable by LISA per year. If these events do occur, they will result in an extremely strong gravitational wave signal, that can easily be detected. [1]

Another possible way for an intermediate mass ratio inspiral is for an intermediate mass black hole in a globular cluster to capture a stellar mass compact object through one of the processes described above. Since the central object is much smaller, these systems will produce gravitational waves with a much higher frequency, opening the possibility of detecting them with the next generation of Earth-based observatories, such as Advanced LIGO and Advanced VIRGO. Although the event rates for these systems are extremely uncertain, some calculations suggest that Advanced LIGO may see several of them per year. [21]

Modelling

Diagram showing the relationship between various approaches to modelling extreme mass ratio inspirals. EMRIBinaryModelling.png
Diagram showing the relationship between various approaches to modelling extreme mass ratio inspirals.

Although the strongest gravitational wave from EMRIs may easily be distinguished from the instrumental noise of the gravitational wave detector, most signals will be deeply buried in the instrumental noise. However, since an EMRI will go through many cycles of gravitational waves (~105) before making the plunge into the central supermassive black hole, it should still be possible to extract the signal using matched filtering. In this process, the observed signal is compared with a template of the expected signal, amplifying components that are similar to the theoretical template. To be effective this requires accurate theoretical predictions for the wave forms of the gravitational waves produced by an extreme mass ratio inspiral. This, in turn, requires accurate modelling of the trajectory of the EMRI. [1]

The equations of motion in general relativity are notoriously hard to solve analytically. Consequently, one needs to use some sort of approximation scheme. Extreme mass ratio inspirals are well suited for this, as the mass of the compact object is much smaller than that of the central supermassive black hole. This allows it to be ignored or treated perturbatively. [22]

Issues with traditional binary modelling approaches

Post-Newtonian expansion

One common approach is to expand the equations of motion for an object in terms of its velocity divided by the speed of light, v/c. This approximation is very effective if the velocity is very small, but becomes rather inaccurate if v/c becomes larger than about 0.3. For binary systems of comparable mass, this limit is not reached until the last few cycles of the orbit. EMRIs, however, spend their last thousand to a million cycles in this regime, making the post-Newtonian expansion an inappropriate tool. [1]

Numerical relativity

Another approach is to completely solve the equations of motion numerically. The non-linear nature of the theory makes this very challenging, but significant success has been achieved in numerically modelling the final phase of the inspiral of binaries of comparable mass. The large number of cycles of an EMRI make the purely numerical approach prohibitively expensive in terms of computing time. [1]

Gravitational self force

The large value of the mass ratio in an EMRI opens another avenue for approximation: expansion in one over the mass ratio. To zeroth order, the path of the lighter object will be a geodesic in the Kerr spacetime generated by the supermassive black hole. Corrections due to the finite mass of the lighter object can then be included, order-by-order in the mass ratio, as an effective force on the object. This effective force is known as the gravitational self force. [1]

In the last decade or so, a lot of progress has been made in calculating the gravitational self force for EMRIs. Numerical codes are available to calculate the gravitational self force on any bound orbit around a non-rotating (Schwarzschild) black hole. [23] And significant progress has been made for calculating the gravitational self force around a rotating black hole. [24]

Notes

  1. ↑ LISA will only have a small chance of detecting such signals if it originates from our Milky Way. [1]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black hole</span> Astronomical object that has a no-return boundary

A black hole is a region of spacetime where gravity is so strong that nothing, including light or other electromagnetic waves, has enough energy to escape it. The theory of general relativity predicts that a sufficiently compact mass can deform spacetime to form a black hole. The boundary of no escape is called the event horizon. Although it has a great effect on the fate and circumstances of an object crossing it, it has no locally detectable features according to general relativity. In many ways, a black hole acts like an ideal black body, as it reflects no light. Moreover, quantum field theory in curved spacetime predicts that event horizons emit Hawking radiation, with the same spectrum as a black body of a temperature inversely proportional to its mass. This temperature is of the order of billionths of a kelvin for stellar black holes, making it essentially impossible to observe directly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General relativity</span> Theory of gravitation as curved spacetime

General relativity, also known as the general theory of relativity and Einstein's theory of gravity, is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1915 and is the current description of gravitation in modern physics. General relativity generalizes special relativity and refines Newton's law of universal gravitation, providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time or four-dimensional spacetime. In particular, the curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever matter and radiation are present. The relation is specified by the Einstein field equations, a system of second order partial differential equations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supermassive black hole</span> Largest type of black hole

A supermassive black hole is the largest type of black hole, with its mass being on the order of hundreds of thousands, or millions to billions of times the mass of the Sun (M☉). Black holes are a class of astronomical objects that have undergone gravitational collapse, leaving behind spheroidal regions of space from which nothing can escape, not even light. Observational evidence indicates that almost every large galaxy has a supermassive black hole at its center. For example, the Milky Way has a supermassive black hole in its Galactic Center, corresponding to the radio source Sagittarius A*. Accretion of interstellar gas onto supermassive black holes is the process responsible for powering active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and quasars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laser Interferometer Space Antenna</span> European space mission to measure gravitational waves

The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is a proposed space probe to detect and accurately measure gravitational waves—tiny ripples in the fabric of spacetime—from astronomical sources. LISA would be the first dedicated space-based gravitational-wave observatory. It aims to measure gravitational waves directly by using laser interferometry. The LISA concept has a constellation of three spacecraft arranged in an equilateral triangle with sides 2.5 million kilometres long, flying along an Earth-like heliocentric orbit. The distance between the satellites is precisely monitored to detect a passing gravitational wave.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intermediate-mass black hole</span> Class of black holes with a mass range of 100 to 100000 solar masses

An intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) is a class of black hole with mass in the range 102–105 solar masses: significantly more than stellar black holes but less than the 105–109 solar mass supermassive black holes. Several IMBH candidate objects have been discovered in our galaxy and others nearby, based on indirect gas cloud velocity and accretion disk spectra observations of various evidentiary strength.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stellar black hole</span> Black hole formed by a collapsed star

A stellar black hole is a black hole formed by the gravitational collapse of a star. They have masses ranging from about 5 to several tens of solar masses. The process is observed as a hypernova explosion or as a gamma ray burst. These black holes are also referred to as collapsars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sagittarius A*</span> Black hole at the center of the Milky Way

Sagittarius A*, abbreviated Sgr A*, is the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Center of the Milky Way. It is located near the border of the constellations Sagittarius and Scorpius, about 5.6° south of the ecliptic, visually close to the Butterfly Cluster (M6) and Lambda Scorpii.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tests of general relativity</span> Scientific experiments

Tests of general relativity serve to establish observational evidence for the theory of general relativity. The first three tests, proposed by Albert Einstein in 1915, concerned the "anomalous" precession of the perihelion of Mercury, the bending of light in gravitational fields, and the gravitational redshift. The precession of Mercury was already known; experiments showing light bending in accordance with the predictions of general relativity were performed in 1919, with increasingly precise measurements made in subsequent tests; and scientists claimed to have measured the gravitational redshift in 1925, although measurements sensitive enough to actually confirm the theory were not made until 1954. A more accurate program starting in 1959 tested general relativity in the weak gravitational field limit, severely limiting possible deviations from the theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gravitational wave</span> Propagating spacetime ripple

Gravitational waves are waves of the intensity of gravity generated by the accelerated masses of an orbital binary system that propagate as waves outward from their source at the speed of light. They were first proposed by Oliver Heaviside in 1893 and then later by Henri Poincaré in 1905 as waves similar to electromagnetic waves but the gravitational equivalent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gravitational-wave astronomy</span> Branch of astronomy using gravitational waves

Gravitational-wave astronomy is an emerging field of science, concerning the observations of gravitational waves to collect relatively unique data and make inferences about objects such as neutron stars and black holes, events such as supernovae, and processes including those of the early universe shortly after the Big Bang.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to black holes:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">S2 (star)</span> Star orbiting close to the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way

S2, also known as S0–2, is a star in the star cluster close to the supermassive black hole Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), orbiting it with a period of 16.0518 years, a semi-major axis of about 970 au, and a pericenter distance of 17 light hours – an orbit with a period only about 30% longer than that of Jupiter around the Sun, but coming no closer than about four times the distance of Neptune from the Sun. The mass when the star first formed is estimated by the European Southern Observatory (ESO) to have been approximately 14 M☉. Based on its spectral type, it probably has a mass of 10 to 15 solar masses.

A hypercompact stellar system (HCSS) is a dense cluster of stars around a supermassive black hole that has been ejected from the center of its host galaxy. Stars that are close to the black hole at the time of the ejection will remain bound to the black hole after it leaves the galaxy, forming the HCSS.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Binary black hole</span> System consisting of two black holes in close orbit around each other

A binary black hole (BBH) is a system consisting of two black holes in close orbit around each other. Like black holes themselves, binary black holes are often divided into stellar binary black holes, formed either as remnants of high-mass binary star systems or by dynamic processes and mutual capture; and binary supermassive black holes, believed to be a result of galactic mergers.

In astrophysics the chirp mass of a compact binary system determines the leading-order orbital evolution of the system as a result of energy loss from emitting gravitational waves. Because the gravitational wave frequency is determined by orbital frequency, the chirp mass also determines the frequency evolution of the gravitational wave signal emitted during a binary's inspiral phase. In gravitational wave data analysis it is easier to measure the chirp mass than the two component masses alone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bahcall–Wolf cusp</span>

Bahcall–Wolf cusp refers to a particular distribution of stars around a massive black hole at the center of a galaxy or globular cluster. If the nucleus containing the black hole is sufficiently old, exchange of orbital energy between stars drives their distribution toward a characteristic form, such that the density of stars, ρ, varies with distance from the black hole, r, as

The TianQin Project is a proposed space-borne gravitational-wave observatory consisting of three spacecraft in Earth orbit. The TianQin project is being led by Professor Luo Jun, President of Sun Yat-sen University, and is based in the university's Zhuhai campus. Construction on project-related infrastructure, which will include a research building, ultra-quiet cave laboratory, and observation center, began in March 2016. The project is estimated to cost 15 billion RMB, with a projected launch date in 2030s. In December 2019, China launched "Tianqin-1, its first satellite for space-based gravitational wave detection."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First observation of gravitational waves</span> 2015 direct detection of gravitational waves by the LIGO and VIRGO interferometers

The first direct observation of gravitational waves was made on 14 September 2015 and was announced by the LIGO and Virgo collaborations on 11 February 2016. Previously, gravitational waves had been inferred only indirectly, via their effect on the timing of pulsars in binary star systems. The waveform, detected by both LIGO observatories, matched the predictions of general relativity for a gravitational wave emanating from the inward spiral and merger of a pair of black holes of around 36 and 29 solar masses and the subsequent "ringdown" of the single resulting black hole. The signal was named GW150914. It was also the first observation of a binary black hole merger, demonstrating both the existence of binary stellar-mass black hole systems and the fact that such mergers could occur within the current age of the universe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carlos Lousto</span>

Carlos O. Lousto is a Distinguished Professor in the School of Mathematical Sciences in Rochester Institute of Technology, known for his work on black hole collisions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GW190521</span> Gravitational wave observation

GW190521 was a gravitational wave signal resulting from the merger of two black holes. It was possibly associated with a coincident flash of light; if this association is correct, the merger would have occurred near a third supermassive black hole. The event was observed by the LIGO and Virgo detectors on 21 May 2019 at 03:02:29 UTC, and published on 2 September 2020. The event had a Luminosity distance of 17 billion light years away from Earth, within a 765 deg2 area towards Coma Berenices, Canes Venatici, or Phoenix.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Amaro-Seoane, Pau; Gair, Jonathan R.; Freitag, Marc; Miller, M. Coleman; Mandel, Ilya; Cutler, Curt J.; Babak, Stanislav (2007). "Intermediate and Extreme Mass-Ratio Inspirals -- Astrophysics, Science Applications and Detection using LISA". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 24 (17): R113–R169. arXiv: astro-ph/0703495 . Bibcode:2007CQGra..24R.113A. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/17/R01. S2CID   37683679.
  2. 1 2 3 Amaro-Seoane, Pau (2018-05-01). "Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals". Living Reviews in Relativity. 21 (1): 4. arXiv: 1205.5240 . Bibcode:2018LRR....21....4A. doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0013-8. PMC   5954169 . PMID   29780279. S2CID   21753891.
  3. 1 2 3 Amaro Seoane, Pau (2022-03-01). The Gravitational Capture of Compact Objects by Massive Black Holes. Bibcode:2022hgwa.bookE..17A.
  4. ↑ Amaro-Seoane, Pau; Aoudia, Sofiane; Babak, Stanislav; Binétruy, Pierre; Berti, Emanuele; Bohé, Alejandro; Caprini, Chiara; Colpi, Monica; Cornish, Neil J; Danzmann, Karsten; Dufaux, Jean-François; Gair, Jonathan; Jennrich, Oliver; Jetzer, Philippe; Klein, Antoine; Lang, Ryan N; Lobo, Alberto; Littenberg, Tyson; McWilliams, Sean T; Nelemans, Gijs; Petiteau, Antoine; Porter, Edward K; Schutz, Bernard F; Sesana, Alberto; Stebbins, Robin; Sumner, Tim; Vallisneri, Michele; Vitale, Stefano; Volonteri, Marta; Ward, Henry (21 June 2012). "Low-frequency gravitational-wave science with eLISA/NGO". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 29 (12): 124016. arXiv: 1202.0839 . Bibcode:2012CQGra..29l4016A. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/12/124016. S2CID   54822413.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Merritt, David (2013). Dynamics and Evolution of Galactic Nuclei. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN   9781400846122.
  6. ↑ Gair, Jonathan; Vallisneri, Michele; Larson, Shane L.; Baker, John G. (2013). "Testing General Relativity with Low-Frequency, Space-Based Gravitational-Wave Detectors". Living Reviews in Relativity. 16 (1): 7. arXiv: 1212.5575 . Bibcode:2013LRR....16....7G. doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-7. PMC   5255528 . PMID   28163624.
  7. ↑ Moore, Christopher; Cole, Robert; Berry, Christopher (19 July 2013). "Gravitational Wave Detectors and Sources" . Retrieved 14 April 2014.
  8. ↑ Glampedakis, Kostas (7 August 2005). "Extreme mass ratio inspirals: LISA's unique probe of black hole gravity". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 22 (15): S605–S659. arXiv: gr-qc/0509024 . Bibcode:2005CQGra..22S.605G. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/15/004. S2CID   27304014.
  9. ↑ Gair, J. R. (13 December 2008). "The black hole symphony: probing new physics using gravitational waves". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 366 (1884): 4365–4379. Bibcode:2008RSPTA.366.4365G. doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0170. PMID   18812300. S2CID   2869235.
  10. ↑ Barack, Leor; Cutler, Curt (2004). "LISA Capture Sources: Approximate Waveforms, Signal-to-Noise Ratios, and Parameter Estimation Accuracy". Physical Review D. 69 (8): 082005. arXiv: gr-qc/0310125 . Bibcode:2004PhRvD..69h2005B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.082005. S2CID   21565397.
  11. ↑ Amaro-Seoane, Pau (2018-05-01). "Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals". Living Reviews in Relativity. 21 (1): 4. arXiv: 1205.5240 . Bibcode:2018LRR....21....4A. doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0013-8. PMC   5954169 . PMID   29780279. S2CID   21753891.
  12. ↑ Amaro Seoane, Pau (2022-03-01). The Gravitational Capture of Compact Objects by Massive Black Holes. Bibcode:2022hgwa.bookE..17A.
  13. ↑ Grace Mason-Jarrett, "Mapping spacetime around supermassive black holes" Things We Don't Know, 1 July 2014
  14. ↑ Berry, C. P. L.; Gair, J. R. (12 December 2012). "Observing the Galaxy's massive black hole with gravitational wave bursts". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 429 (1): 589–612. arXiv: 1210.2778 . Bibcode:2013MNRAS.429..589B. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts360. S2CID   118944979.
  15. ↑ Merritt, David; Alexander, Tal; Mikkola, Seppo; Will, Clifford (August 2011). "Stellar dynamics of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals". Physical Review D. 84 (4): 044024. arXiv: 1102.3180 . Bibcode:2011PhRvD..84d4024M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.044024. S2CID   119186938.
  16. ↑ Hopman, Clovis; Alexander, Tal (10 July 2006). "Resonant Relaxation near a Massive Black Hole: The Stellar Distribution and Gravitational Wave Sources". The Astrophysical Journal. 645 (2): 1152–1163. arXiv: astro-ph/0601161 . Bibcode:2006ApJ...645.1152H. doi:10.1086/504400. S2CID   6867371.
  17. ↑ Bar-Or, Ben; Alexander, Tal (2016-04-01). "Steady-state Relativistic Stellar Dynamics Around a Massive Black hole". The Astrophysical Journal. 820 (2): 129. arXiv: 1508.01390 . Bibcode:2016ApJ...820..129B. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/129. ISSN   0004-637X. S2CID   118369453.
  18. ↑ Bar-Or, Ben; Alexander, Tal (2014-12-01). "The statistical mechanics of relativistic orbits around a massive black hole". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 31 (24): 244003. arXiv: 1404.0351 . Bibcode:2014CQGra..31x4003B. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/24/244003. ISSN   0264-9381. S2CID   118545872.
  19. 1 2 Amaro-Seoane, Pau; Sopuerta, Carlos F.; Freitag, Marc D. (2013). "The role of the supermassive black hole spin in the estimation of the EMRI event rate". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 429 (4): 3155–3165. arXiv: 1205.4713 . Bibcode:2013MNRAS.429.3155A. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts572. S2CID   119305660.
  20. ↑ Arca Sedda, Manuel; Amaro Seoane, Pau; Chen, Xian (2021-08-01). "Merging stellar and intermediate-mass black holes in dense clusters: implications for LIGO, LISA, and the next generation of gravitational wave detectors". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 652: A54. arXiv: 2007.13746 . Bibcode:2021A&A...652A..54A. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037785. ISSN   0004-6361. S2CID   234358809.
  21. ↑ Mandel, Ilya; Brown, Duncan A.; Gair, Jonathan R.; Miller, M. Coleman (2008). "Rates and Characteristics of Intermediate Mass Ratio Inspirals Detectable by Advanced LIGO". Astrophysical Journal. 681 (2): 1431–1447. arXiv: 0705.0285 . Bibcode:2008ApJ...681.1431M. doi:10.1086/588246. S2CID   10664239.
  22. ↑ Barack, Leor (7 November 2009). "Gravitational self-force in extreme mass-ratio inspirals". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 26 (21): 213001. arXiv: 0908.1664 . Bibcode:2009CQGra..26u3001B. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/21/213001. S2CID   13881512.
  23. ↑ Barack, Leor; Sago, Norichika (2007). "Gravitational self force on a particle in circular orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole". Physical Review D. 75 (6): 064021. arXiv: gr-qc/0701069 . Bibcode:2007PhRvD..75f4021B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.064021. S2CID   119404834.Barack, Leor; Sago, Norichika (2010). "Gravitational self-force on a particle in eccentric orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole". Physical Review D. 81 (8): 084021. arXiv: 1002.2386 . Bibcode:2010PhRvD..81h4021B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.084021. S2CID   119108413.
  24. ↑ Warburton, Niels; Barack, Leor (2011). "Self force on a scalar charge in Kerr spacetime: eccentric equatorial orbits". Physical Review D. 83 (12): 124038. arXiv: 1103.0287 . Bibcode:2011PhRvD..83l4038W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.124038. S2CID   119187059.Warburton, Niels; Barack, Leor (2010). "Self force on a scalar charge in Kerr spacetime: circular equatorial orbits". Physical Review D. 81 (8): 084039. arXiv: 1003.1860 . Bibcode:2010PhRvD..81h4039W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.084039. S2CID   119115725.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.