Cosmic microwave background

Last updated
Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe heat map of temperature fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background WMAP 2012.png
Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe heat map of temperature fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background

The cosmic microwave background (CMB, CMBR), or relic radiation, is microwave radiation that fills all space in the observable universe. With a standard optical telescope, the background space between stars and galaxies is almost completely dark. However, a sufficiently sensitive radio telescope detects a faint background glow that is almost uniform and is not associated with any star, galaxy, or other object. This glow is strongest in the microwave region of the radio spectrum. The accidental discovery of the CMB in 1965 by American radio astronomers Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson was the culmination of work initiated in the 1940s.

Contents

The CMB is landmark evidence of the Big Bang theory for the origin of the universe. In the Big Bang cosmological models, during the earliest periods, the universe was filled with an opaque fog of dense, hot plasma of sub-atomic particles. As the universe expanded, this plasma cooled to the point where protons and electrons combined to form neutral atoms of mostly hydrogen. Unlike the plasma, these atoms could not scatter thermal radiation by Thomson scattering, and so the universe became transparent. Known as the recombination epoch, this decoupling event released photons to travel freely through space. However, the photons have grown less energetic due to the cosmological redshift associated with the expansion of the universe. The surface of last scattering refers to a shell at the right distance in space so photons are now received that were originally emitted at the time of decoupling.

The CMB is not completely smooth and uniform, showing a faint anisotropy that can be mapped by sensitive detectors. Ground and space-based experiments such as COBE, WMAP and Planck have been used to measure these temperature inhomogeneities. The anisotropy structure is determined by various interactions of matter and photons up to the point of decoupling, which results in a characteristic lumpy pattern that varies with angular scale. The distribution of the anisotropy across the sky has frequency components that can be represented by a power spectrum displaying a sequence of peaks and valleys. The peak values of this spectrum hold important information about the physical properties of the early universe: the first peak determines the overall curvature of the universe, while the second and third peak detail the density of normal matter and so-called dark matter, respectively. Extracting fine details from the CMB data can be challenging, since the emission has undergone modification by foreground features such as galaxy clusters.

Features

Graph of cosmic microwave background spectrum around its peak in the microwave frequency range, as measured by the FIRAS instrument on the COBE. While vastly exaggerated "error bars" were included here to show the measured data points, the true error bars are too small to be seen even in an enlarged image, and it is impossible to distinguish the observed data from the blackbody spectrum for 2.725 K. Cmbr.svg
Graph of cosmic microwave background spectrum around its peak in the microwave frequency range, as measured by the FIRAS instrument on the COBE. While vastly exaggerated "error bars" were included here to show the measured data points, the true error bars are too small to be seen even in an enlarged image, and it is impossible to distinguish the observed data from the blackbody spectrum for 2.725  K.

The cosmic microwave background radiation is an emission of uniform black body thermal energy coming from all directions. Intensity of the CMB is expressed in kelvin (K), the SI unit of temperature. The CMB has a thermal black body spectrum at a temperature of 2.72548±0.00057 K. [4] Variations in intensity are expressed as variations in temperature. The blackbody temperature uniquely characterizes the intensity of the radiation at all wavelengths; a measured brightness temperature at any wavelength can be converted to a blackbody temperature. [5]

The radiation is remarkably uniform across the sky, very unlike the almost point-like structure of stars or clumps of stars in galaxies. [6] The radiation is isotropic to roughly one part in 25,000: the root mean square variations are just over 100 μK, [7] after subtracting a dipole anisotropy from the Doppler shift of the background radiation. The latter is caused by the peculiar velocity of the Sun relative to the comoving cosmic rest frame as it moves at 369.82 ± 0.11 km/s towards the constellation Crater near its boundary with the constellation Leo [8] The CMB dipole and aberration at higher multipoles have been measured, consistent with galactic motion. [9] Despite the very small degree of anisotropy in the CMB, many aspects can be measured with high precision and such measurements are critical for cosmological theories. [6]

In addition to temperature anisotropy, the CMB should have an angular variation in polarization. The polarization at each direction in the sky has an orientation described in terms of E-mode and B-mode polarization. The E-mode signal is a factor of 10 less strong than the temperature anisotropy; it supplements the temperature data as they are correlated. The B-mode signal is even weaker but may contain additional cosmological data. [6]

The anisotropy is related to physical origin of the polarization. Excitation of an electron by linear polarized light generates polarized light at 90 degrees to the incident direction. If the incoming radiation is isotropic, different incoming directions create polarizations that cancel out. If the incoming radiation has quadrupole anisotropy, residual polarization will be seen. [10]

Other than the temperature and polarization anisotropy, the CMB frequency spectrum is expected to feature tiny departures from the black-body law known as spectral distortions. These are also at the focus of an active research effort with the hope of a first measurement within the forthcoming decades, as they contain a wealth of information about the primordial universe and the formation of structures at late time. [11]

The CMB contains the vast majority of photons in the universe by a factor of 400 to 1; [12] :5 the number density of photons in the CMB is one billion times (109) the number density of matter in the universe. Without the expansion of the universe to cause the cooling of the CMB, the night sky would shine as brightly as the Sun. [13] The energy density of the CMB is 0.260 eV/cm3 (4.17×10−14 J/m3), about 411 photons/cm3. [14]

History

Early speculations

In 1931, Georges Lemaître speculated that remnants of the early universe may be observable as radiation, but his candidate was cosmic rays. [15] :140 Richard C. Tolman showed in 1934 that expansion of the universe would cool blackbody radiation while maintaining a thermal spectrum. The cosmic microwave background was first predicted in 1948 by Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman, in a correction [16] they prepared for a paper by Alpher's PhD advisor George Gamow. [17] Alpher and Herman were able to estimate the temperature of the cosmic microwave background to be 5 K. [18]

Discovery

The Holmdel Horn Antenna on which Penzias and Wilson discovered the cosmic microwave background. Horn Antenna-in Holmdel, New Jersey - restoration1.jpg
The Holmdel Horn Antenna on which Penzias and Wilson discovered the cosmic microwave background.

The first published recognition of the CMB radiation as a detectable phenomenon appeared in a brief paper by Soviet astrophysicists A. G. Doroshkevich and Igor Novikov, in the spring of 1964. [20] In 1964, David Todd Wilkinson and Peter Roll, Dicke's colleagues at Princeton University, began constructing a Dicke radiometer to measure the cosmic microwave background. [21] In 1964, Arno Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson at the Crawford Hill location of Bell Telephone Laboratories in nearby Holmdel Township, New Jersey had built a Dicke radiometer that they intended to use for radio astronomy and satellite communication experiments. The antenna was constructed in 1959 to support Project Echo—the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's passive communications satellites, which used large earth orbiting aluminized plastic balloons as reflectors to bounce radio signals from one point on the Earth to another. [19] On 20 May 1964 they made their first measurement clearly showing the presence of the microwave background, [22] with their instrument having an excess 4.2K antenna temperature which they could not account for. After receiving a telephone call from Crawford Hill, Dicke said "Boys, we've been scooped." [23] [24] [25] [15] :140 A meeting between the Princeton and Crawford Hill groups determined that the antenna temperature was indeed due to the microwave background. Penzias and Wilson received the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics for their discovery. [26]

Cosmic origin

The interpretation of the cosmic microwave background was a controversial issue in the late 1960s. Alternative explanations included energy from within the solar system, from galaxies, from intergalactic plasma, from multiple extragalactic radio sources. Two requirements would show that the microwave radiation was truly "cosmic". First the intensity vs frequency or spectrum needed to be shown to match a thermal or blackbody source. This was accomplished by 1968 in a series of measurements of the radiation temperature at higher and lower wavelengths. Second the radiation needed be shown to be isotropic, the same from all directions. This was also accomplished by 1970, demonstrating that this radiation was truly cosmic in origin. [27]

Progress on theory

In the 1970s numerous studies showed that tiny deviations from isotropy in the CMB could result from events in the early universe. [27] :8.5.1 Harrison, [28] Peebles and Yu, [29] and Zel'dovich [30] realized that the early universe would require quantum inhomogeneities that would result in temperature anisotropy at the level of 10−4 or 10−5. [27] :8.5.3.2 Rashid Sunyaev, using the alternative name relic radiation, calculated the observable imprint that these inhomogeneities would have on the cosmic microwave background. [31]

COBE

After a lull in the 1970s caused in part by the many experimental difficulties in measuring CMB at high precision, [27] :8.5.1 increasingly stringent limits on the anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background were set by ground-based experiments during the 1980s. RELIKT-1, a Soviet cosmic microwave background anisotropy experiment on board the Prognoz 9 satellite (launched 1 July 1983), gave the first upper limits on the large-scale anisotropy. [27] :8.5.3.2

The other key event in the 1980s was the proposal by Alan Guth for cosmic inflation. This theory of rapid spatial expansion gave an explanation for large-scale isotropy by allowing causal connection just before the epoch of last scattering. [27] :8.5.4 With this and similar theories, detailed prediction encouraged larger and more ambitious experiments.

The NASA Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite orbited Earth in 1989–1996 detected and quantified the large scale anisotropies at the limit of its detection capabilities. The NASA COBE mission clearly confirmed the primary anisotropy with the Differential Microwave Radiometer instrument, publishing their findings in 1992. [32] [33] The team received the Nobel Prize in physics for 2006 for this discovery.

Precision cosmology

Inspired by the COBE results, a series of ground and balloon-based experiments measured cosmic microwave background anisotropies on smaller angular scales over the[ which? ] two decades. The sensitivity of the new experiments improved dramatically, with a reduction in internal noise by three orders of magnitude. [1] The primary goal of these experiments was to measure the scale of the first acoustic peak, which COBE did not have sufficient resolution to resolve. This peak corresponds to large scale density variations in the early universe that are created by gravitational instabilities, resulting in acoustical oscillations in the plasma. [34] The first peak in the anisotropy was tentatively detected by the MAT/TOCO experiment [35] and the result was confirmed by the BOOMERanG [36] and MAXIMA experiments. [37] These measurements demonstrated that the geometry of the universe is approximately flat, rather than curved. [38] They ruled out cosmic strings as a major component of cosmic structure formation and suggested cosmic inflation was the right theory of structure formation. [39]

Observations after COBE

Comparison of CMB results from COBE, WMAP and Planck
(March 21, 2013) PIA16874-CobeWmapPlanckComparison-20130321.jpg
Comparison of CMB results from COBE, WMAP and Planck
(March 21, 2013)

Inspired by the initial COBE results of an extremely isotropic and homogeneous background, a series of ground- and balloon-based experiments quantified CMB anisotropies on smaller angular scales over the next decade. The primary goal of these experiments was to measure the angular scale of the first acoustic peak, for which COBE did not have sufficient resolution. These measurements were able to rule out cosmic strings as the leading theory of cosmic structure formation, and suggested cosmic inflation was the right theory.

During the 1990s, the first peak was measured with increasing sensitivity and by 2000 the BOOMERanG experiment reported that the highest power fluctuations occur at scales of approximately one degree. Together with other cosmological data, these results implied that the geometry of the universe is flat. A number of ground-based interferometers provided measurements of the fluctuations with higher accuracy over the next three years, including the Very Small Array, Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI), and the Cosmic Background Imager (CBI). DASI made the first detection of the polarization of the CMB and the CBI provided the first E-mode polarization spectrum with compelling evidence that it is out of phase with the T-mode spectrum.

Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe

In June 2001, NASA launched a second CMB space mission, WMAP, to make much more precise measurements of the large scale anisotropies over the full sky. WMAP used symmetric, rapid-multi-modulated scanning, rapid switching radiometers at five frequencies to minimize non-sky signal noise. [40] The data from the mission was released in five installments, the last being the nine year summary. The results are broadly consistent Lambda CDM models based on 6 free parameters and fitting in to Big Bang cosmology with cosmic inflation. [41]

Degree Angular Scale Interferometer

The Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI) was a telescope installed at the U.S. National Science Foundation's Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station in Antarctica. It was a 13-element interferometer operating between 26 and 36 GHz (Ka band) in ten bands. The instrument is similar in design to the Cosmic Background Imager (CBI) and the Very Small Array (VSA).

In 2001 The DASI team announced the most detailed measurements of the temperature, or power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). These results contained the first detection of the 2nd and 3rd acoustic peaks in the CMB, which were important evidence for inflation theory. This announcement was done in conjunction with the BOOMERanG and MAXIMA experiment. [42] In 2002 the team reported the first detection of polarization anisotropies in the CMB. [43]

Atacama Cosmology Telescope

The Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) was a cosmological millimeter-wave telescope located on Cerro Toco in the Atacama Desert in the north of Chile. [44] ACT made high-sensitivity, arcminute resolution, microwave-wavelength surveys of the sky in order to study the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), the relic radiation left by the Big Bang process. Located 40 km from San Pedro de Atacama, at an altitude of 5,190 metres (17,030 ft), it was one of the highest ground-based telescopes in the world. [lower-alpha 1]

Planck Surveyor

A third space mission, the ESA (European Space Agency) Planck Surveyor, was launched in May 2009 and performed an even more detailed investigation until it was shut down in October 2013. Planck employed both HEMT radiometers and bolometer technology and measured the CMB at a smaller scale than WMAP. Its detectors were trialled in the Antarctic Viper telescope as ACBAR (Arcminute Cosmology Bolometer Array Receiver) experiment—which has produced the most precise measurements at small angular scales to date—and in the Archeops balloon telescope.

On 21 March 2013, the European-led research team behind the Planck cosmology probe released the mission's all-sky map (565x318 jpeg, 3600x1800 jpeg) of the cosmic microwave background. [46] [47] The map suggests the universe is slightly older than researchers expected. According to the map, subtle fluctuations in temperature were imprinted on the deep sky when the cosmos was about 370000 years old. The imprint reflects ripples that arose as early, in the existence of the universe, as the first nonillionth (10−30) of a second. Apparently, these ripples gave rise to the present vast cosmic web of galaxy clusters and dark matter. Based on the 2013 data, the universe contains 4.9% ordinary matter, 26.8% dark matter and 68.3% dark energy. On 5 February 2015, new data was released by the Planck mission, according to which the age of the universe is 13.799±0.021 billion years old and the Hubble constant was measured to be 67.74±0.46 (km/s)/Mpc. [48]

South Pole Telescope

The South Pole Telescope (SPT) is a 10-metre (390 in) diameter telescope located at the Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station, Antarctica. The telescope is designed for observations in the microwave, millimeter-wave, and submillimeter-wave regions of the electromagnetic spectrum, with the particular design goal of measuring the faint, diffuse emission from the cosmic microwave background (CMB). [49] Key results include a wide and deep survey of discovering hundreds of clusters of galaxies using the Sunyaev–Zel'dovich effect, a sensitive 5 arcminute CMB power spectrum survey, and the first detection of B-mode polarized CMB.

Theoretical models

The cosmic microwave background radiation and the cosmological redshift-distance relation are together regarded as the best available evidence for the Big Bang event. Measurements of the CMB have made the inflationary Big Bang model the Standard Cosmological Model. [50] The discovery of the CMB in the mid-1960s curtailed interest in alternatives such as the steady state theory. [51]

In the Big Bang model for the formation of the universe, inflationary cosmology predicts that after about 10−37 seconds [52] the nascent universe underwent exponential growth that smoothed out nearly all irregularities. The remaining irregularities were caused by quantum fluctuations in the inflaton field that caused the inflation event. [53] Long before the formation of stars and planets, the early universe was more compact, much hotter and, starting 10−6 seconds after the Big Bang, filled with a uniform glow from its white-hot fog of interacting plasma of photons, electrons, and baryons.

As the universe expanded, adiabatic cooling caused the energy density of the plasma to decrease until it became favorable for electrons to combine with protons, forming hydrogen atoms. This recombination event happened when the temperature was around 3000 K or when the universe was approximately 379,000 years old. [54] As photons did not interact with these electrically neutral atoms, the former began to travel freely through space, resulting in the decoupling of matter and radiation. [55]

The color temperature of the ensemble of decoupled photons has continued to diminish ever since; now down to 2.7260±0.0013 K, [4] it will continue to drop as the universe expands. The intensity of the radiation corresponds to black-body radiation at 2.726 K because red-shifted black-body radiation is just like black-body radiation at a lower temperature. According to the Big Bang model, the radiation from the sky we measure today comes from a spherical surface called the surface of last scattering. This represents the set of locations in space at which the decoupling event is estimated to have occurred [56] [57] and at a point in time such that the photons from that distance have just reached observers. Most of the radiation energy in the universe is in the cosmic microwave background, [58] making up a fraction of roughly 6×10−5 of the total density of the universe. [59]

Two of the greatest successes of the Big Bang theory are its prediction of the almost perfect black body spectrum and its detailed prediction of the anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background. The CMB spectrum has become the most precisely measured black body spectrum in nature. [60]

Predictions based on the Big Bang model

In the late 1940s Alpher and Herman reasoned that if there was a Big Bang, the expansion of the universe would have stretched the high-energy radiation of the very early universe into the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum, and down to a temperature of about 5 K. They were slightly off with their estimate, but they had the right idea. They predicted the CMB. It took another 15 years for Penzias and Wilson to discover that the microwave background was actually there. [61]

According to standard cosmology, the CMB gives a snapshot of the hot early universe at the point in time when the temperature dropped enough to allow electrons and protons to form hydrogen atoms. This event made the universe nearly transparent to radiation because light was no longer being scattered off free electrons. [62] When this occurred some 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the temperature of the universe was about 3,000 K. This corresponds to an ambient energy of about 0.26  eV , which is much less than the 13.6 eV ionization energy of hydrogen. [63] This epoch is generally known as the "time of last scattering" or the period of recombination or decoupling. [64]

Since decoupling, the color temperature of the background radiation has dropped by an average factor of 1,089 [40] due to the expansion of the universe. As the universe expands, the CMB photons are redshifted, causing them to decrease in energy. The color temperature of this radiation stays inversely proportional to a parameter that describes the relative expansion of the universe over time, known as the scale length. The color temperature Tr of the CMB as a function of redshift, z, can be shown to be proportional to the color temperature of the CMB as observed in the present day (2.725 K or 0.2348 meV): [65]

Tr = 2.725 K × (1 + z)

The high degree of uniformity throughout the observable universe and its faint but measured anisotropy lend strong support for the Big Bang model in general and the ΛCDM ("Lambda Cold Dark Matter") model in particular. Moreover, the fluctuations are coherent on angular scales that are larger than the apparent cosmological horizon at recombination. Either such coherence is acausally fine-tuned, or cosmic inflation occurred. [66] [67]

Primary anisotropy

The power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background radiation temperature anisotropy in terms of the angular scale (or multipole moment). The data shown comes from the WMAP (2006), Acbar (2004) Boomerang (2005), CBI (2004), and VSA (2004) instruments. Also shown is a theoretical model (solid line). PowerSpectrumExt.svg
The power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background radiation temperature anisotropy in terms of the angular scale (or multipole moment). The data shown comes from the WMAP (2006), Acbar (2004) Boomerang (2005), CBI (2004), and VSA (2004) instruments. Also shown is a theoretical model (solid line).

The anisotropy, or directional dependency, of the cosmic microwave background is divided into two types: primary anisotropy, due to effects that occur at the surface of last scattering and before; and secondary anisotropy, due to effects such as interactions of the background radiation with intervening hot gas or gravitational potentials, which occur between the last scattering surface and the observer.

The structure of the cosmic microwave background anisotropies is principally determined by two effects: acoustic oscillations and diffusion damping (also called collisionless damping or Silk damping). The acoustic oscillations arise because of a conflict in the photonbaryon plasma in the early universe. The pressure of the photons tends to erase anisotropies, whereas the gravitational attraction of the baryons, moving at speeds much slower than light, makes them tend to collapse to form overdensities. These two effects compete to create acoustic oscillations, which give the microwave background its characteristic peak structure. The peaks correspond, roughly, to resonances in which the photons decouple when a particular mode is at its peak amplitude.

The peaks contain interesting physical signatures. The angular scale of the first peak determines the curvature of the universe (but not the topology of the universe). The next peak—ratio of the odd peaks to the even peaks—determines the reduced baryon density. [68] The third peak can be used to get information about the dark-matter density. [69]

The locations of the peaks give important information about the nature of the primordial density perturbations. There are two fundamental types of density perturbations called adiabatic and isocurvature. A general density perturbation is a mixture of both, and different theories that purport to explain the primordial density perturbation spectrum predict different mixtures.

Adiabatic density perturbations
In an adiabatic density perturbation, the fractional additional number density of each type of particle (baryons, photons, etc.) is the same. That is, if at one place there is a 1% higher number density of baryons than average, then at that place there is a 1% higher number density of photons (and a 1% higher number density in neutrinos) than average. Cosmic inflation predicts that the primordial perturbations are adiabatic.
Isocurvature density perturbations
In an isocurvature density perturbation, the sum (over different types of particle) of the fractional additional densities is zero. That is, a perturbation where at some spot there is 1% more energy in baryons than average, 1% more energy in photons than average, and 2% less energy in neutrinos than average, would be a pure isocurvature perturbation. Hypothetical cosmic strings would produce mostly isocurvature primordial perturbations.

The CMB spectrum can distinguish between these two because these two types of perturbations produce different peak locations. Isocurvature density perturbations produce a series of peaks whose angular scales ( values of the peaks) are roughly in the ratio 1 : 3 : 5 : ..., while adiabatic density perturbations produce peaks whose locations are in the ratio 1 : 2 : 3 : ... [70] Observations are consistent with the primordial density perturbations being entirely adiabatic, providing key support for inflation, and ruling out many models of structure formation involving, for example, cosmic strings.

Collisionless damping is caused by two effects, when the treatment of the primordial plasma as fluid begins to break down:

  • the increasing mean free path of the photons as the primordial plasma becomes increasingly rarefied in an expanding universe,
  • the finite depth of the last scattering surface (LSS), which causes the mean free path to increase rapidly during decoupling, even while some Compton scattering is still occurring.

These effects contribute about equally to the suppression of anisotropies at small scales and give rise to the characteristic exponential damping tail seen in the very small angular scale anisotropies.

The depth of the LSS refers to the fact that the decoupling of the photons and baryons does not happen instantaneously, but instead requires an appreciable fraction of the age of the universe up to that era. One method of quantifying how long this process took uses the photon visibility function (PVF). This function is defined so that, denoting the PVF by P(t), the probability that a CMB photon last scattered between time t and t + dt is given by P(t)dt.

The maximum of the PVF (the time when it is most likely that a given CMB photon last scattered) is known quite precisely. The first-year WMAP results put the time at which P(t) has a maximum as 372,000 years. [71] This is often taken as the "time" at which the CMB formed. However, to figure out how long it took the photons and baryons to decouple, we need a measure of the width of the PVF. The WMAP team finds that the PVF is greater than half of its maximal value (the "full width at half maximum", or FWHM) over an interval of 115,000 years. [71] :179 By this measure, decoupling took place over roughly 115,000 years, and thus when it was complete, the universe was roughly 487,000 years old.

Late time anisotropy

Since the CMB came into existence, it has apparently been modified by several subsequent physical processes, which are collectively referred to as late-time anisotropy, or secondary anisotropy. When the CMB photons became free to travel unimpeded, ordinary matter in the universe was mostly in the form of neutral hydrogen and helium atoms. However, observations of galaxies today seem to indicate that most of the volume of the intergalactic medium (IGM) consists of ionized material (since there are few absorption lines due to hydrogen atoms). This implies a period of reionization during which some of the material of the universe was broken into hydrogen ions.

The CMB photons are scattered by free charges such as electrons that are not bound in atoms. In an ionized universe, such charged particles have been liberated from neutral atoms by ionizing (ultraviolet) radiation. Today these free charges are at sufficiently low density in most of the volume of the universe that they do not measurably affect the CMB. However, if the IGM was ionized at very early times when the universe was still denser, then there are two main effects on the CMB:

  1. Small scale anisotropies are erased. (Just as when looking at an object through fog, details of the object appear fuzzy.)
  2. The physics of how photons are scattered by free electrons (Thomson scattering) induces polarization anisotropies on large angular scales. This broad angle polarization is correlated with the broad angle temperature perturbation.

Both of these effects have been observed by the WMAP spacecraft, providing evidence that the universe was ionized at very early times, at a redshift around 10. [72] The detailed provenance of this early ionizing radiation is still a matter of scientific debate. It may have included starlight from the very first population of stars (population III stars), supernovae when these first stars reached the end of their lives, or the ionizing radiation produced by the accretion disks of massive black holes.

The time following the emission of the cosmic microwave background—and before the observation of the first stars—is semi-humorously referred to by cosmologists as the Dark Age, and is a period which is under intense study by astronomers (see 21 centimeter radiation).

Two other effects which occurred between reionization and our observations of the cosmic microwave background, and which appear to cause anisotropies, are the Sunyaev–Zeldovich effect, where a cloud of high-energy electrons scatters the radiation, transferring some of its energy to the CMB photons, and the Sachs–Wolfe effect, which causes photons from the Cosmic Microwave Background to be gravitationally redshifted or blueshifted due to changing gravitational fields.

Alternative theories

The standard cosmology that includes the Big Bang "enjoys considerable popularity among the practicing cosmologists" [73] :211 However, there are challenges to the standard big bang framework for explaining CMB data. In particular standard cosmology requires fine-tuning of some free parameters, with different values supported by different experimental data. [73] :245 As an example of the fine-tuning issue, standard cosmology cannot predict the present temperature of the relic radiation, . [73] :229 This value of is one of the best results of experimental cosmology and the steady state model can predict it. [61] However, alternative models have their own set of problems and they have only made post-facto explanations of existing observations. [73] :239 Nevertheless, these alternatives have played an important historic role in providing ideas for and challenges to the standard explanation. [12]

Polarization

Artist impression of the gravitational lensing effect of massive cosmic structures Gravitational lens-full.jpg
Artist impression of the gravitational lensing effect of massive cosmic structures

The cosmic microwave background is polarized at the level of a few microkelvin. There are two types of polarization, called E-mode (or gradient-mode) and B-mode (or curl mode). [74] This is in analogy to electrostatics, in which the electric field (E-field) has a vanishing curl and the magnetic field (B-field) has a vanishing divergence.

E-modes

The E-modes arise from Thomson scattering in a heterogeneous plasma. [74] E-modes were first seen in 2002 by the Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI). [75] [76]

B-modes

B-modes are expected to be an order of magnitude weaker than the E-modes. The former are not produced by standard scalar type perturbations, but are generated by gravitational waves during cosmic inflation shortly after the big bang. [77] [78] [79] However, gravitational lensing of the stronger E-modes can also produce B-mode polarization. [80] [81] Detecting the original B-modes signal requires analysis of the contamination caused by lensing of the relatively strong E-mode signal. [82]

Primordial gravitational waves

Models of "slow-roll" cosmic inflation in the early universe predicts primordial gravitational waves that would impact the polarisation of the cosmic microwave background, creating a specific pattern of B-mode polarization. Detection of this pattern would support the theory of inflation and their strength can confirm and exclude different models of inflation. [78] [83] Claims that this characteristic pattern of B-mode polarization had been measured by BICEP2 instrument [84] were later attributed to cosmic dust due to new results of the Planck experiment. [85] [83] :253

Gravitational lensing

The second type of B-modes was discovered in 2013 using the South Pole Telescope with help from the Herschel Space Observatory. [86] In October 2014, a measurement of the B-mode polarization at 150 GHz was published by the POLARBEAR experiment. [87] Compared to BICEP2, POLARBEAR focuses on a smaller patch of the sky and is less susceptible to dust effects. The team reported that POLARBEAR's measured B-mode polarization was of cosmological origin (and not just due to dust) at a 97.2% confidence level. [88]

Multipole analysis

Example Multipole Power Spectrum. WMAP Data are represented as points, curves correspond to the best-fit LCDM model WMAP 2008 TT spectra.png
Example Multipole Power Spectrum. WMAP Data are represented as points, curves correspond to the best-fit LCDM model

The CMB angular anisotropies are usually presented in terms of power per multipole. [89] The angular the map of temperature across the sky, is written as coefficients of spherical harmonics, where the term measures the strength of the angular oscillation in , and is the multipole number while m is the azimuthal number. The azimuthal variation is not significant and is removed by applying the angular correlation function, giving power spectrum term  Increasing values of correspond to higher multipole moments of CMB, meaning more rapid variation with angle.

CMBR monopole term ( = 0)

The monopole term, = 0, is the constant isotropic mean temperature of the CMB, Tγ = 2.7255±0.0006 K [89] with one standard deviation confidence. This term must be measured with absolute temperature devices, such as the FIRAS instrument on the COBE satellite. [89] :499

CMBR dipole anisotropy ( = 1)

CMB dipole represents the largest anisotropy, which is in the first spherical harmonic ( = 1), a cosine function. The amplitude of CMB dipole is around 3.3621±0.0010 mK. [89] The CMB dipole moment is interpreted as the peculiar motion of the Earth relative to the CMB. Its amplitude depends on the time due to the Earth's orbit about the barycenter of the solar system. This enables us to add a time-dependent term to the dipole expression. The modulation of this term is 1 year, [89] [90] which fits the observation done by COBE FIRAS. [90] [91] The dipole moment does not encode any primordial information.

From the CMB data, it is seen that the Sun appears to be moving at 369.82±0.11 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB (also called the CMB rest frame, or the frame of reference in which there is no motion through the CMB). The Local Group — the galaxy group that includes our own Milky Way galaxy — appears to be moving at 620±15 km/s in the direction of galactic longitude = 271.9°±, b = 30°±. [89] The dipole is now used to calibrate mapping studies.

Multipole ( ≥ 2)

The temperature variation in the CMB temperature maps at higher multipoles, or ≥ 2, is considered to be the result of perturbations of the density in the early Universe, before the recombination epoch at a redshift of around z ⋍ 1100. Before recombination, the Universe consisted of a hot, dense plasma of electrons and baryons. In such a hot dense environment, electrons and protons could not form any neutral atoms. The baryons in such early Universe remained highly ionized and so were tightly coupled with photons through the effect of Thompson scattering. These phenomena caused the pressure and gravitational effects to act against each other, and triggered fluctuations in the photon-baryon plasma. Quickly after the recombination epoch, the rapid expansion of the universe caused the plasma to cool down and these fluctuations are "frozen into" the CMB maps we observe today. [89]

Data analysis challenges

Raw CMBR data, even from space vehicles such as WMAP or Planck, contain foreground effects that completely obscure the fine-scale structure of the cosmic microwave background. The fine-scale structure is superimposed on the raw CMBR data but is too small to be seen at the scale of the raw data. The most prominent of the foreground effects is the dipole anisotropy caused by the Sun's motion relative to the CMBR background. The dipole anisotropy and others due to Earth's annual motion relative to the Sun and numerous microwave sources in the galactic plane and elsewhere must be subtracted out to reveal the extremely tiny variations characterizing the fine-scale structure of the CMBR background. The detailed analysis of CMBR data to produce maps, an angular power spectrum, and ultimately cosmological parameters is a complicated, computationally difficult problem.

In practice it is hard to take the effects of noise and foreground sources into account. In particular, these foregrounds are dominated by galactic emissions such as Bremsstrahlung, synchrotron, and dust that emit in the microwave band; in practice, the galaxy has to be removed, resulting in a CMB map that is not a full-sky map. In addition, point sources like galaxies and clusters represent another source of foreground which must be removed so as not to distort the short scale structure of the CMB power spectrum.

Constraints on many cosmological parameters can be obtained from their effects on the power spectrum, and results are often calculated using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling techniques.

Anomalies

With the increasingly precise data provided by WMAP, there have been a number of claims that the CMB exhibits anomalies, such as very large scale anisotropies, anomalous alignments, and non-Gaussian distributions. [92] [93] [94] The most longstanding of these is the low- multipole controversy. Even in the COBE map, it was observed that the quadrupole ( = 2, spherical harmonic) has a low amplitude compared to the predictions of the Big Bang. In particular, the quadrupole and octupole ( = 3) modes appear to have an unexplained alignment with each other and with both the ecliptic plane and equinoxes. [95] [96] [97] A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of new physics at the greatest observable scales; other groups suspect systematic errors in the data. [98] [99] [100]

Ultimately, due to the foregrounds and the cosmic variance problem, the greatest modes will never be as well measured as the small angular scale modes. The analyses were performed on two maps that have had the foregrounds removed as far as possible: the "internal linear combination" map of the WMAP collaboration and a similar map prepared by Max Tegmark and others. [101] [40] [102] Later analyses have pointed out that these are the modes most susceptible to foreground contamination from synchrotron, dust, and Bremsstrahlung emission, and from experimental uncertainty in the monopole and dipole.

A full Bayesian analysis of the WMAP power spectrum demonstrates that the quadrupole prediction of Lambda-CDM cosmology is consistent with the data at the 10% level and that the observed octupole is not remarkable. [103] Carefully accounting for the procedure used to remove the foregrounds from the full sky map further reduces the significance of the alignment by ~5%. [104] [105] [106] [107] Recent observations with the Planck telescope, which is very much more sensitive than WMAP and has a larger angular resolution, record the same anomaly, and so instrumental error (but not foreground contamination) appears to be ruled out. [108] Coincidence is a possible explanation, chief scientist from WMAP, Charles L. Bennett suggested coincidence and human psychology were involved, "I do think there is a bit of a psychological effect; people want to find unusual things." [109]

Measurements of the density of quasars based on Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer data finds a dipole significantly different from the one extracted from the CMB anisotropy. [110] This difference is conflict with the cosmological principle. [111]

Future evolution

Assuming the universe keeps expanding and it does not suffer a Big Crunch, a Big Rip, or another similar fate, the cosmic microwave background will continue redshifting until it will no longer be detectable, [112] and will be superseded first by the one produced by starlight, and perhaps, later by the background radiation fields of processes that may take place in the far future of the universe such as proton decay, evaporation of black holes, and positronium decay. [113]

Timeline of prediction, discovery and interpretation

Thermal (non-microwave background) temperature predictions

Microwave background radiation predictions and measurements

See also

Notes

  1. The Receiver Lab Telescope (RLT), an 80 cm (31 in) instrument, is higher at 5,525 m (18,125 ft), but is not permanent as it is fixed to the roof of a movable shipping container. [45] The 2009 University of Tokyo Atacama Observatory is significantly higher than both.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Physical cosmology</span> Branch of cosmology which studies mathematical models of the universe

Physical cosmology is a branch of cosmology concerned with the study of cosmological models. A cosmological model, or simply cosmology, provides a description of the largest-scale structures and dynamics of the universe and allows study of fundamental questions about its origin, structure, evolution, and ultimate fate. Cosmology as a science originated with the Copernican principle, which implies that celestial bodies obey identical physical laws to those on Earth, and Newtonian mechanics, which first allowed those physical laws to be understood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe</span> NASA satellite of the Explorer program

The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), originally known as the Microwave Anisotropy Probe, was a NASA spacecraft operating from 2001 to 2010 which measured temperature differences across the sky in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) – the radiant heat remaining from the Big Bang. Headed by Professor Charles L. Bennett of Johns Hopkins University, the mission was developed in a joint partnership between the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and Princeton University. The WMAP spacecraft was launched on 30 June 2001 from Florida. The WMAP mission succeeded the COBE space mission and was the second medium-class (MIDEX) spacecraft in the NASA Explorer program. In 2003, MAP was renamed WMAP in honor of cosmologist David Todd Wilkinson (1935–2002), who had been a member of the mission's science team. After nine years of operations, WMAP was switched off in 2010, following the launch of the more advanced Planck spacecraft by European Space Agency (ESA) in 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cosmic Background Explorer</span> NASA satellite of the Explorer program

The Cosmic Background Explorer, also referred to as Explorer 66, was a NASA satellite dedicated to cosmology, which operated from 1989 to 1993. Its goals were to investigate the cosmic microwave background radiation of the universe and provide measurements that would help shape our understanding of the cosmos.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sunyaev–Zeldovich effect</span> Spectral distortion of cosmic microwave background in galaxy clusters

The Sunyaev–Zeldovich effect is the spectral distortion of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) through inverse Compton scattering by high-energy electrons in galaxy clusters, in which the low-energy CMB photons receive an average energy boost during collision with the high-energy cluster electrons. Observed distortions of the cosmic microwave background spectrum are used to detect the disturbance of density in the universe. Using the Sunyaev–Zeldovich effect, dense clusters of galaxies have been observed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sachs–Wolfe effect</span> Phenomenon of redshift in cosmology

The Sachs–Wolfe effect, named after Rainer K. Sachs and Arthur M. Wolfe, is a property of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), in which photons from the CMB are gravitationally redshifted, causing the CMB spectrum to appear uneven. This effect is the predominant source of fluctuations in the CMB for angular scales larger than about ten degrees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Observational cosmology</span> Study of the origin of the universe (structure and evolution)

Observational cosmology is the study of the structure, the evolution and the origin of the universe through observation, using instruments such as telescopes and cosmic ray detectors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Age of the universe</span> Time elapsed since the Big Bang

In physical cosmology, the age of the universe is the time elapsed since the Big Bang. Astronomers have derived two different measurements of the age of the universe: a measurement based on direct observations of an early state of the universe, which indicate an age of 13.787±0.020 billion years as interpreted with the Lambda-CDM concordance model as of 2021; and a measurement based on the observations of the local, modern universe, which suggest a younger age. The uncertainty of the first kind of measurement has been narrowed down to 20 million years, based on a number of studies that all show similar figures for the age. These studies include researches of the microwave background radiation by the Planck spacecraft, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe and other space probes. Measurements of the cosmic background radiation give the cooling time of the universe since the Big Bang, and measurements of the expansion rate of the universe can be used to calculate its approximate age by extrapolating backwards in time. The range of the estimate is also within the range of the estimate for the oldest observed star in the universe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">BOOMERanG experiment</span> High-altitude balloon package measuring the universes geometry

BOOMERanG experiment was an experiment that flew a telescope on a (high-altitude) balloon and measured the cosmic microwave background radiation of a part of the sky during three sub-orbital flights. It was the first experiment to make large, high-fidelity images of the CMB temperature anisotropies, and is best known for the discovery in 2000 that the geometry of the universe is close to flat, with similar results from the competing MAXIMA experiment.

Primordial fluctuations are density variations in the early universe which are considered the seeds of all structure in the universe. Currently, the most widely accepted explanation for their origin is in the context of cosmic inflation. According to the inflationary paradigm, the exponential growth of the scale factor during inflation caused quantum fluctuations of the inflaton field to be stretched to macroscopic scales, and, upon leaving the horizon, to "freeze in". At the later stages of radiation- and matter-domination, these fluctuations re-entered the horizon, and thus set the initial conditions for structure formation.

<i>Planck</i> (spacecraft) Space observatory

Planck was a space observatory operated by the European Space Agency (ESA) from 2009 to 2013. It was an ambitious project that aimed to map the anisotropies of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) at microwave and infrared frequencies, with high sensitivity and angular resolution. The mission was highly successful and substantially improved upon observations made by the NASA Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cosmic neutrino background</span> Universes background particle radiation composed of neutrinos

The cosmic neutrino background is the universe's background particle radiation composed of neutrinos. They are sometimes known as relic neutrinos.

The Degree Angular Scale Interferometer (DASI) was a telescope installed at the U.S. National Science Foundation's Amundsen–Scott South Pole Station in Antarctica. It was a 13-element interferometer operating between 26 and 36 GHz in ten bands. The instrument is similar in design to the Cosmic Background Imager (CBI) and the Very Small Array (VSA). In 2001 The DASI team announced the most detailed measurements of the temperature, or power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). These results contained the first detection of the 2nd and 3rd acoustic peaks in the CMB, which were important evidence for inflation theory. This announcement was done in conjunction with the BOOMERanG and MAXIMA experiment. In 2002 the team reported the first detection of polarization anisotropies in the CMB.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Archeops</span>

Archeops was a balloon-borne instrument dedicated to measuring the Cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies. The study of this radiation is essential to obtain precise information on the evolution of the Universe: density, Hubble constant, age of the Universe, etc. To achieve this goal, measurements were done with devices cooled down at 100mK temperature placed at the focus of a warm telescope. To avoid atmospheric disturbance the whole apparatus is placed on a gondola below a helium balloon that reaches 40 km altitude.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CMB cold spot</span> Region in space

The CMB Cold Spot or WMAP Cold Spot is a region of the sky seen in microwaves that has been found to be unusually large and cold relative to the expected properties of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMBR). The "Cold Spot" is approximately 70 μK (0.00007 K) colder than the average CMB temperature, whereas the root mean square of typical temperature variations is only 18 μK. At some points, the "cold spot" is 140 μK colder than the average CMB temperature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diffusion damping</span> Physical process in cosmology

In modern cosmological theory, diffusion damping, also called photon diffusion damping, is a physical process which reduced density inequalities (anisotropies) in the early universe, making the universe itself and the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) more uniform. Around 300,000 years after the Big Bang, during the epoch of recombination, diffusing photons travelled from hot regions of space to cold ones, equalising the temperatures of these regions. This effect is responsible, along with baryon acoustic oscillations, the Doppler effect, and the effects of gravity on electromagnetic radiation, for the eventual formation of galaxies and galaxy clusters, these being the dominant large scale structures which are observed in the universe. It is a damping by diffusion, not of diffusion.

Conformal cyclic cosmology (CCC) is a cosmological model in the framework of general relativity and proposed by theoretical physicist Roger Penrose. In CCC, the universe iterates through infinite cycles, with the future timelike infinity of each previous iteration being identified with the Big Bang singularity of the next. Penrose popularized this theory in his 2010 book Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe.

The "axis of evil" is a name given to the apparent correlation between the plane of the Solar System and aspects of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). It gives the plane of the Solar System and hence the location of Earth a greater significance than might be expected by chance – a result which has been claimed to be evidence of a departure from the Copernican principle as assumed in the concordance model.

In cosmological inflation, within the slow-roll paradigm, the Lyth argument places a theoretical upper bound on the amount of gravitational waves produced during inflation, given the amount of departure from the homogeneity of the cosmic microwave background (CMB).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cosmic microwave background spectral distortions</span> Fluctuations in the energy spectrum of the microwave background

CMB spectral distortions are tiny departures of the average cosmic microwave background (CMB) frequency spectrum from the predictions given by a perfect black body. They can be produced by a number of standard and non-standard processes occurring at the early stages of cosmic history, and therefore allow us to probe the standard picture of cosmology. Importantly, the CMB frequency spectrum and its distortions should not be confused with the CMB anisotropy power spectrum, which relates to spatial fluctuations of the CMB temperature in different directions of the sky.

References

  1. 1 2 Komatsu, Eiichiro (2022-05-18). "New physics from the polarized light of the cosmic microwave background". Nature Reviews Physics. 4 (7): 452–469. arXiv: 2202.13919 . Bibcode:2022NatRP...4..452K. doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00452-4. ISSN   2522-5820.
  2. "LAMBDA - Cosmic Background Explorer". lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2024-05-17.
  3. Fixsen, D. J.; Mather, J. C. (2002-12-20). "The Spectral Results of the Far-Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer Instrument on COBE". The Astrophysical Journal. 581 (2): 817–822. Bibcode:2002ApJ...581..817F. doi:10.1086/344402. ISSN   0004-637X.
  4. 1 2 Fixsen, D. J. (2009). "The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background". The Astrophysical Journal . 707 (2): 916–920. arXiv: 0911.1955 . Bibcode:2009ApJ...707..916F. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/916. S2CID   119217397.
  5. 1 2 Wright, Edward. "Cosmic Microwave Background". astro.ucla.edu. Retrieved 2024-05-28.
  6. 1 2 3 Hu, Wayne; Dodelson, Scott (September 2002). "Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 40 (1): 171–216. arXiv: astro-ph/0110414 . Bibcode:2002ARA&A..40..171H. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093926. ISSN   0066-4146.
  7. The Planck Collaboration (2020), "Planck 2018 results V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods", Astronomy and Astrophysics, 641: A5, arXiv: 1907.12875 , Bibcode:2020A&A...641A...5P, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386
  8. The Planck Collaboration (2020), "Planck 2018 results. I. Overview, and the cosmological legacy of Planck", Astronomy and Astrophysics, 641: A1, arXiv: 1807.06205 , Bibcode:2020A&A...641A...1P, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880, S2CID   119185252
  9. The Planck Collaboration (2014), "Planck 2013 results. XXVII. Doppler boosting of the CMB: Eppur si muove", Astronomy, 571 (27): A27, arXiv: 1303.5087 , Bibcode:2014A&A...571A..27P, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321556, S2CID   5398329
  10. Hu, Wayne, and Martin White. "A CMB polarization primer." arXiv preprint astro-ph/9706147 (1997).
  11. Chluba, J.; et al. (2021). "New Horizons in Cosmology with Spectral Distortions of the Cosmic Microwave Background". Voyage 2050 Proposals. 51 (3): 1515–1554. arXiv: 1909.01593 . Bibcode:2021ExA....51.1515C. doi:10.1007/s10686-021-09729-5. S2CID   202539910.
  12. 1 2 Ćirković, Milan M.; Perović, Slobodan (2018-05-01). "Alternative explanations of the cosmic microwave background: A historical and an epistemological perspective". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 62: 1–18. arXiv: 1705.07721 . Bibcode:2018SHPMP..62....1C. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2017.04.005. ISSN   1355-2198.
  13. K.A. Olive and J.A. Peacock (September 2017) "21. Big-Bang Cosmology" in .S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), to be published in Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024)
  14. "29. Cosmic Microwave Background: Particle Data Group P.A. Zyla (LBL, Berkeley) et al" (PDF).
  15. 1 2 Peebles, P. J. E (1993). Principles of Physical Cosmology. Princeton University Press. pp.  139–148. ISBN   978-0-691-01933-8.
  16. Alpher, R. A.; Herman, R. C. (1948). "Evolution of the Universe". Nature . 162 (4124): 774–775. Bibcode:1948Natur.162..774A. doi:10.1038/162774b0. S2CID   4113488.
  17. Gamow, G. (1948). "The evolution of the universe". Nature . 162 (4122): 680–682. Bibcode:1948Natur.162..680G. doi:10.1038/162680a0. PMID   18893719. S2CID   4793163.
  18. Assis, A. K. T.; Neves, M. C. D. (1995). "History of the 2.7 K Temperature Prior to Penzias and Wilson" (PDF). Apeiron (3): 79–87.
  19. 1 2 Overbye, Dennis (5 September 2023). "Back to New Jersey, Where the Universe Began - A half-century ago, a radio telescope in Holmdel, N.J., sent two astronomers 13.8 billion years back in time — and opened a cosmic window that scientists have been peering through ever since". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 5 September 2023. Retrieved 5 September 2023.
  20. Penzias, A. A. (2006). "The origin of elements" (PDF). Science. 205 (4406). Nobel Foundation: 549–54. doi:10.1126/science.205.4406.549. PMID   17729659. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2006-09-25. Retrieved 2006-10-04.
  21. Dicke, R. H. (1946). "The Measurement of Thermal Radiation at Microwave Frequencies". Review of Scientific Instruments . 17 (7): 268–275. Bibcode:1946RScI...17..268D. doi: 10.1063/1.1770483 . PMID   20991753. S2CID   26658623. This basic design for a radiometer has been used in most subsequent cosmic microwave background experiments.
  22. "The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (Nobel Lecture) by Robert Wilson 8 Dec 1978, p. 474" (PDF).
  23. Penzias, A. A.; Wilson, R. W. (1965). "A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s". The Astrophysical Journal . 142 (1): 419–421. Bibcode:1965ApJ...142..419P. doi: 10.1086/148307 .
  24. Smoot Group (28 March 1996). "The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation". Lawrence Berkeley Lab . Retrieved 2008-12-11.
  25. Dicke, R. H.; et al. (1965). "Cosmic Black-Body Radiation". Astrophysical Journal . 142: 414–419. Bibcode:1965ApJ...142..414D. doi:10.1086/148306.
  26. "The Nobel Prize in Physics 1978". Nobel Foundation. 1978. Retrieved 2009-01-08.
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Partridge, R. Bruce (2019-04-04). "The cosmic microwave background: from discovery to precision cosmology". In Kragh, Helge; Longair, Malcolm S. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Modern Cosmology (1 ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 292–345. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198817666.013.8. ISBN   978-0-19-881766-6.
  28. Harrison, E. R. (1970). "Fluctuations at the threshold of classical cosmology". Physical Review D . 1 (10): 2726–2730. Bibcode:1970PhRvD...1.2726H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.1.2726.
  29. Peebles, P. J. E.; Yu, J. T. (1970). "Primeval Adiabatic Perturbation in an Expanding Universe". Astrophysical Journal . 162: 815–836. Bibcode:1970ApJ...162..815P. doi:10.1086/150713.
  30. Zeldovich, Y. B. (1972). "A hypothesis, unifying the structure and the entropy of the Universe". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society . 160: 1P–4P. Bibcode:1972MNRAS.160P...1Z. doi: 10.1093/mnras/160.1.1P .
  31. Sunyaev RA; Zel'dovich YB (1970). "Small-scale fluctuations of relic radiation". Astrophys. Space Sci. 7 (1): 3–19. Bibcode:1970Ap&SS...7....3S. doi:10.1007/BF00653471. S2CID   117050217.
  32. Smoot, G. F.; et al. (1992). "Structure in the COBE differential microwave radiometer first-year maps". Astrophysical Journal Letters . 396 (1): L1–L5. Bibcode:1992ApJ...396L...1S. doi: 10.1086/186504 . S2CID   120701913.
  33. Bennett, C.L.; et al. (1996). "Four-Year COBE DMR Cosmic Microwave Background Observations: Maps and Basic Results". Astrophysical Journal Letters . 464: L1–L4. arXiv: astro-ph/9601067 . Bibcode:1996ApJ...464L...1B. doi:10.1086/310075. S2CID   18144842.
  34. Grupen, C.; et al. (2005). Astroparticle Physics. Springer. pp. 240–241. ISBN   978-3-540-25312-9.
  35. Miller, A. D.; et al. (1999). "A Measurement of the Angular Power Spectrum of the Microwave Background Made from the High Chilean Andes". Astrophysical Journal . 521 (2): L79–L82. arXiv: astro-ph/9905100 . Bibcode:1999ApJ...521L..79T. doi:10.1086/312197. S2CID   16534514.
  36. Melchiorri, A.; et al. (2000). "A Measurement of Ω from the North American Test Flight of Boomerang". The Astrophysical Journal Letters . 536 (2): L63–L66. arXiv: astro-ph/9911445 . Bibcode:2000ApJ...536L..63M. doi:10.1086/312744. PMID   10859119. S2CID   27518923.
  37. Hanany, S.; et al. (2000). "MAXIMA-1: A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy on Angular Scales of 10'–5°". Astrophysical Journal . 545 (1): L5–L9. arXiv: astro-ph/0005123 . Bibcode:2000ApJ...545L...5H. doi:10.1086/317322. S2CID   119495132.
  38. de Bernardis, P.; et al. (2000). "A flat Universe from high-resolution maps of the cosmic microwave background radiation". Nature . 404 (6781): 955–959. arXiv: astro-ph/0004404 . Bibcode:2000Natur.404..955D. doi:10.1038/35010035. hdl:10044/1/60851. PMID   10801117. S2CID   4412370.
  39. Pogosian, L.; et al. (2003). "Observational constraints on cosmic string production during brane inflation". Physical Review D . 68 (2): 023506. arXiv: hep-th/0304188 . Bibcode:2003PhRvD..68b3506P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023506.
  40. 1 2 3 Bennett, C. L.; (WMAP collaboration); Hinshaw, G.; Jarosik, N.; Kogut, A.; Limon, M.; Meyer, S. S.; Page, L.; Spergel, D. N.; Tucker, G. S.; Wollack, E.; Wright, E. L.; Barnes, C.; Greason, M. R.; Hill, R. S.; Komatsu, E.; Nolta, M. R.; Odegard, N.; Peiris, H. V.; Verde, L.; Weiland, J. L.; et al. (2003). "First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: preliminary maps and basic results". Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series . 148 (1): 1–27. arXiv: astro-ph/0302207 . Bibcode:2003ApJS..148....1B. doi:10.1086/377253. S2CID   115601. This paper warns that "the statistics of this internal linear combination map are complex and inappropriate for most CMB analyses."
  41. Bennett, C. L.; Larson, D.; Weiland, J. L.; Jarosik, N.; Hinshaw, G.; Odegard, N.; Smith, K. M.; Hill, R. S.; Gold, B.; Halpern, M.; Komatsu, E.; Nolta, M. R.; Page, L.; Spergel, D. N.; Wollack, E. (2013-09-20). "NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 208 (2): 20. arXiv: 1212.5225 . Bibcode:2013ApJS..208...20B. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20. ISSN   0067-0049.
  42. Glanz, James (2001-04-30). "Listen Closely: From Tiny Hum Came Big Bang". The New York Times. Retrieved 4 August 2014.
  43. Leitch, E.M.; et al. (December 2002). "Measurement of polarization with the Degree Angular Scale Interferometer". Nature. 420 (6917): 763–771. arXiv: astro-ph/0209476 . Bibcode:2002Natur.420..763L. doi:10.1038/nature01271. PMID   12490940. S2CID   13967570.
  44. Fowler, J. W.; Niemack, M. D.; Dicker, S. R.; Aboobaker, A. M.; Ade, P. A. R.; Battistelli, E. S.; Devlin, M. J.; Fisher, R. P.; Halpern, M.; Hargrave, P. C.; Hincks, A. D. (2007-06-10). "Optical design of the Atacama Cosmology Telescope and the Millimeter Bolometric Array Camera". Applied Optics. 46 (17): 3444–3454. arXiv: astro-ph/0701020 . Bibcode:2007ApOpt..46.3444F. doi:10.1364/AO.46.003444. ISSN   0003-6935. PMID   17514303. S2CID   10833374.
  45. Marrone; et al. (2005). "Observations in the 1.3 and 1.5 THz Atmospheric Windows with the Receiver Lab Telescope". Sixteenth International Symposium on Space Terahertz Technology: 64. arXiv: astro-ph/0505273 . Bibcode:2005stt..conf...64M.
  46. Clavin, Whitney; Harrington, J.D. (21 March 2013). "Planck Mission Brings Universe Into Sharp Focus". NASA . Retrieved 21 March 2013.
  47. Staff (21 March 2013). "Mapping the Early Universe". The New York Times . Retrieved 23 March 2013.
  48. Planck Collaboration (2016). "Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters (See Table 4 on page 31 of pfd)". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 594 (13): A13. arXiv: 1502.01589 . Bibcode:2016A&A...594A..13P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830. S2CID   119262962.
  49. J. E. Carlstrom; P. A. R. Ade; K. A. Aird; et al. (May 2011). "The 10 Meter South Pole Telescope". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific . 123 (903): 568–581. arXiv: 0907.4445 . Bibcode:2011PASP..123..568C. doi:10.1086/659879. ISSN   0004-6280. Wikidata   Q56603073.
  50. Scott, D. (2005). "The Standard Cosmological Model". Canadian Journal of Physics. 84 (6–7): 419–435. arXiv: astro-ph/0510731 . Bibcode:2006CaJPh..84..419S. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.317.2954 . doi:10.1139/P06-066. S2CID   15606491.
  51. Durham, Frank; Purrington, Robert D. (1983). Frame of the universe: a history of physical cosmology . Columbia University Press. pp.  193–209. ISBN   978-0-231-05393-8.
  52. Guth, A. H. (1998). The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins. Basic Books. p.  186. ISBN   978-0201328400. OCLC   35701222.
  53. Cirigliano, D.; de Vega, H.J.; Sanchez, N. G. (2005). "Clarifying inflation models: The precise inflationary potential from effective field theory and the WMAP data". Physical Review D (Submitted manuscript). 71 (10): 77–115. arXiv: astro-ph/0412634 . Bibcode:2005PhRvD..71j3518C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.103518. S2CID   36572996.
  54. Abbott, B. (2007). "Microwave (WMAP) All-Sky Survey". Hayden Planetarium. Archived from the original on 2013-02-13. Retrieved 2008-01-13.
  55. Gawiser, E.; Silk, J. (2000). "The cosmic microwave background radiation". Physics Reports . 333–334 (2000): 245–267. arXiv: astro-ph/0002044 . Bibcode:2000PhR...333..245G. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.588.3349 . doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00025-9. S2CID   15398837.
  56. Smoot, G. F. (2006). "Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Anisotropies: Their Discovery and Utilization". Nobel Lecture. Nobel Foundation . Retrieved 2008-12-22.
  57. "NASA's "CMB Surface of Last Scatter"" . Retrieved 2023-07-05.
  58. Hobson, M.P.; Efstathiou, G.; Lasenby, A.N. (2006). General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists . Cambridge University Press. pp.  388. ISBN   978-0-521-82951-9.
  59. Unsöld, A.; Bodo, B. (2002). The New Cosmos, An Introduction to Astronomy and Astrophysics (5th ed.). Springer-Verlag. p. 485. Bibcode:2001ncia.book.....U. ISBN   978-3-540-67877-9.
  60. White, M. (1999). "Anisotropies in the CMB". Proceedings of the Los Angeles Meeting, DPF 99. UCLA. arXiv: astro-ph/9903232 . Bibcode:1999dpf..conf.....W.
  61. 1 2 3 4 5 Assis, A. K. T.; Paulo, São; Neves, M. C. D. (July 1995). "History of the 2.7 K Temperature Prior to Penzias and Wilson" (PDF). Apeiron. 2 (3): 79–87.
  62. Kaku, M. (2014). "First Second of the Big Bang". How the Universe Works . Season 3. Episode 4. Discovery Science.
  63. Fixsen, D. J. (1995). "Formation of Structure in the Universe". arXiv: astro-ph/9508159 .
  64. "Converted number: Conversion from K to eV".
  65. Noterdaeme, P.; Petitjean, P.; Srianand, R.; Ledoux, C.; López, S. (February 2011). "The evolution of the cosmic microwave background temperature. Measurements of TCMB at high redshift from carbon monoxide excitation". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 526: L7. arXiv: 1012.3164 . Bibcode:2011A&A...526L...7N. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016140. S2CID   118485014.
  66. Dodelson, S. (2003). "Coherent Phase Argument for Inflation". AIP Conference Proceedings . 689: 184–196. arXiv: hep-ph/0309057 . Bibcode:2003AIPC..689..184D. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.344.3524 . doi:10.1063/1.1627736. S2CID   18570203.
  67. Baumann, D. (2011). "The Physics of Inflation" (PDF). University of Cambridge. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-09-21. Retrieved 2015-05-09.
  68. Wayne Hu. "Baryons and Inertia".
  69. Wayne Hu. "Radiation Driving Force".
  70. Hu, W.; White, M. (1996). "Acoustic Signatures in the Cosmic Microwave Background". Astrophysical Journal . 471: 30–51. arXiv: astro-ph/9602019 . Bibcode:1996ApJ...471...30H. doi:10.1086/177951. S2CID   8791666.
  71. 1 2 WMAP Collaboration; Verde, L.; Peiris, H. V.; Komatsu, E.; Nolta, M. R.; Bennett, C. L.; Halpern, M.; Hinshaw, G.; et al. (2003). "First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters". Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series . 148 (1): 175–194. arXiv: astro-ph/0302209 . Bibcode:2003ApJS..148..175S. doi:10.1086/377226. S2CID   10794058.
  72. 1 2 Hinshaw, G.; Larson, D.; Komatsu, E.; Spergel, D. N.; Bennett, C. L.; Dunkley, J.; Nolta, M. R.; Halpern, M.; Hill, R. S.; Odegard, N.; Page, L.; Smith, K. M.; Weiland, J. L.; Gold, B.; Jarosik, N. (2013-09-20). "NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETER RESULTS". The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 208 (2): 19. arXiv: 1212.5226 . Bibcode:2013ApJS..208...19H. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19. ISSN   0067-0049.
  73. 1 2 3 4 Narlikar, Jayant V.; Padmanabhan, T. (September 2001). "Standard Cosmology and Alternatives: A Critical Appraisal". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 39 (1): 211–248. Bibcode:2001ARA&A..39..211N. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.211. ISSN   0066-4146.
  74. 1 2 Trippe, Sascha (2014). "Polarization and Polarimetry: A Review". Journal of the Korean Astronomical Society. 47 (1): 15–39. arXiv: 1401.1911 . Bibcode:2014JKAS...47...15T. doi:10.5303/JKAS.2014.47.1.15. ISSN   1225-4614.
  75. Kovac, J. M.; Leitch, E. M.; Pryke, C.; Carlstrom, J. E.; Halverson, N. W.; Holzapfel, W. L. (December 2002). "Detection of polarization in the cosmic microwave background using DASI". Nature. 420 (6917): 772–787. arXiv: astro-ph/0209478 . Bibcode:2002Natur.420..772K. doi:10.1038/nature01269. ISSN   0028-0836. PMID   12490941.
  76. Ade, P. A. R.; Aikin, R. W.; Barkats, D.; Benton, S. J.; Bischoff, C. A.; Bock, J. J.; Brevik, J. A.; Buder, I.; Bullock, E.; Dowell, C. D.; Duband, L.; Filippini, J. P.; Fliescher, S.; Golwala, S. R.; Halpern, M. (2014-06-19). "Detection of B -Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2". Physical Review Letters. 112 (24): 241101. arXiv: 1403.3985 . Bibcode:2014PhRvL.112x1101B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   24996078.
  77. Seljak, U. (June 1997). "Measuring Polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background". Astrophysical Journal. 482 (1): 6–16. arXiv: astro-ph/9608131 . Bibcode:1997ApJ...482....6S. doi:10.1086/304123. S2CID   16825580.
  78. 1 2 Seljak, U.; Zaldarriaga M. (March 17, 1997). "Signature of Gravity Waves in the Polarization of the Microwave Background". Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (11): 2054–2057. arXiv: astro-ph/9609169 . Bibcode:1997PhRvL..78.2054S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2054. S2CID   30795875.
  79. Kamionkowski, M.; Kosowsky A. & Stebbins A. (1997). "A Probe of Primordial Gravity Waves and Vorticity". Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (11): 2058–2061. arXiv: astro-ph/9609132 . Bibcode:1997PhRvL..78.2058K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2058. S2CID   17330375.
  80. Zaldarriaga, M.; Seljak U. (July 15, 1998). "Gravitational lensing effect on cosmic microwave background polarization". Physical Review D. 2. 58 (2): 023003. arXiv: astro-ph/9803150 . Bibcode:1998PhRvD..58b3003Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.023003. S2CID   119512504.
  81. Lewis, A.; Challinor, A. (2006). "Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB". Physics Reports . 429 (1): 1–65. arXiv: astro-ph/0601594 . Bibcode:2006PhR...429....1L. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2006.03.002. S2CID   1731891.
  82. Hanson, D.; et al. (2013). "Detection of B-mode polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Background with data from the South Pole Telescope". Physical Review Letters . 111 (14): 141301. arXiv: 1307.5830 . Bibcode:2013PhRvL.111n1301H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.141301. PMID   24138230. S2CID   9437637.
  83. 1 2 Kamionkowski, Marc; Kovetz, Ely D. (2016-09-19). "The Quest for B Modes from Inflationary Gravitational Waves". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 54 (1): 227–269. arXiv: 1510.06042 . Bibcode:2016ARA&A..54..227K. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023433. ISSN   0066-4146.
  84. Overbye, Dennis (22 September 2014). "Study Confirms Criticism of Big Bang Finding". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2022-01-01. Retrieved 22 September 2014.
  85. Planck Collaboration Team (9 February 2016). "Planck intermediate results. XXX. The angular power spectrum of polarized dust emission at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 586 (133): A133. arXiv: 1409.5738 . Bibcode:2016A&A...586A.133P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425034. S2CID   9857299.
  86. Samuel Reich, Eugenie (2013). "Polarization detected in Big Bang's echo". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2013.13441. S2CID   211730550.
  87. The Polarbear Collaboration (2014). "A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background B-Mode Polarization Power Spectrum at Sub-Degree Scales with POLARBEAR". The Astrophysical Journal . 794 (2): 171. arXiv: 1403.2369 . Bibcode:2014ApJ...794..171P. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/171. S2CID   118598825.
  88. "POLARBEAR project offers clues about origin of universe's cosmic growth spurt". Christian Science Monitor. October 21, 2014.
  89. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 P.A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group) (2020). "Review of Particle Physics" (PDF). Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics. 2020 (8): 083C01. doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptaa104 . Cosmic Microwave Background review by Scott and Smoot.
  90. 1 2 Bennett, C. "COBE Differential Microwave Radiometers: Calibration Techniques".
  91. Shosh, S. (2016). "Dipole Modulation of Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature and Polarization". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2016 (1): 046. arXiv: 1507.04078 . Bibcode:2016JCAP...01..046G. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/046. S2CID   118553819.
  92. Rossmanith, G.; Räth, C.; Banday, A. J.; Morfill, G. (2009). "Non-Gaussian Signatures in the five-year WMAP data as identified with isotropic scaling indices". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 399 (4): 1921–1933. arXiv: 0905.2854 . Bibcode:2009MNRAS.399.1921R. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15421.x . S2CID   11586058.
  93. Bernui, A.; Mota, B.; Rebouças, M. J.; Tavakol, R. (2007). "Mapping the large-scale anisotropy in the WMAP data". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 464 (2): 479–485. arXiv: astro-ph/0511666 . Bibcode:2007A&A...464..479B. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065585. S2CID   16138962.
  94. Jaffe, T.R.; Banday, A. J.; Eriksen, H. K.; Górski, K. M.; Hansen, F. K. (2005). "Evidence of vorticity and shear at large angular scales in the WMAP data: a violation of cosmological isotropy?". The Astrophysical Journal. 629 (1): L1–L4. arXiv: astro-ph/0503213 . Bibcode:2005ApJ...629L...1J. doi:10.1086/444454. S2CID   15521559.
  95. de Oliveira-Costa, A.; Tegmark, Max; Zaldarriaga, Matias; Hamilton, Andrew (2004). "The significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP". Physical Review D (Submitted manuscript). 69 (6): 063516. arXiv: astro-ph/0307282 . Bibcode:2004PhRvD..69f3516D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516. S2CID   119463060.
  96. Schwarz, D. J.; Starkman, Glenn D.; et al. (2004). "Is the low- microwave background cosmic?". Physical Review Letters (Submitted manuscript). 93 (22): 221301. arXiv: astro-ph/0403353 . Bibcode:2004PhRvL..93v1301S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.221301. PMID   15601079. S2CID   12554281.
  97. Bielewicz, P.; Gorski, K. M.; Banday, A. J. (2004). "Low-order multipole maps of CMB anisotropy derived from WMAP". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society . 355 (4): 1283–1302. arXiv: astro-ph/0405007 . Bibcode:2004MNRAS.355.1283B. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08405.x . S2CID   5564564.
  98. Liu, Hao; Li, Ti-Pei (2009). "Improved CMB Map from WMAP Data". arXiv: 0907.2731v3 [astro-ph].
  99. Sawangwit, Utane; Shanks, Tom (2010). "Lambda-CDM and the WMAP Power Spectrum Beam Profile Sensitivity". arXiv: 1006.1270v1 [astro-ph].
  100. Liu, Hao; et al. (2010). "Diagnosing Timing Error in WMAP Data". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters. 413 (1): L96–L100. arXiv: 1009.2701v1 . Bibcode:2011MNRAS.413L..96L. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01041.x . S2CID   118739762.
  101. Hinshaw, G.; (WMAP collaboration); Bennett, C. L.; Bean, R.; Doré, O.; Greason, M. R.; Halpern, M.; Hill, R. S.; Jarosik, N.; Kogut, A.; Komatsu, E.; Limon, M.; Odegard, N.; Meyer, S. S.; Page, L.; Peiris, H. V.; Spergel, D. N.; Tucker, G. S.; Verde, L.; Weiland, J. L.; Wollack, E.; Wright, E. L.; et al. (2007). "Three-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: temperature analysis". Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series . 170 (2): 288–334. arXiv: astro-ph/0603451 . Bibcode:2007ApJS..170..288H. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.471.7186 . doi:10.1086/513698. S2CID   15554608.
  102. Tegmark, M.; de Oliveira-Costa, A.; Hamilton, A. (2003). "A high resolution foreground cleaned CMB map from WMAP". Physical Review D . 68 (12): 123523. arXiv: astro-ph/0302496 . Bibcode:2003PhRvD..68l3523T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.123523. S2CID   17981329. This paper states, "Not surprisingly, the two most contaminated multipoles are [the quadrupole and octupole], which most closely trace the galactic plane morphology."
  103. O'Dwyer, I.; Eriksen, H. K.; Wandelt, B. D.; Jewell, J. B.; Larson, D. L.; Górski, K. M.; Banday, A. J.; Levin, S.; Lilje, P. B. (2004). "Bayesian Power Spectrum Analysis of the First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data". Astrophysical Journal Letters . 617 (2): L99–L102. arXiv: astro-ph/0407027 . Bibcode:2004ApJ...617L..99O. doi:10.1086/427386. S2CID   118150531.
  104. Slosar, A.; Seljak, U. (2004). "Assessing the effects of foregrounds and sky removal in WMAP". Physical Review D (Submitted manuscript). 70 (8): 083002. arXiv: astro-ph/0404567 . Bibcode:2004PhRvD..70h3002S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083002. S2CID   119443655.
  105. Bielewicz, P.; Eriksen, H. K.; Banday, A. J.; Górski, K. M.; Lilje, P. B. (2005). "Multipole vector anomalies in the first-year WMAP data: a cut-sky analysis". Astrophysical Journal . 635 (2): 750–60. arXiv: astro-ph/0507186 . Bibcode:2005ApJ...635..750B. doi:10.1086/497263. S2CID   1103733.
  106. Copi, C.J.; Huterer, Dragan; Schwarz, D. J.; Starkman, G. D. (2006). "On the large-angle anomalies of the microwave sky". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society . 367 (1): 79–102. arXiv: astro-ph/0508047 . Bibcode:2006MNRAS.367...79C. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.490.6391 . doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09980.x . S2CID   6184966.
  107. de Oliveira-Costa, A.; Tegmark, M. (2006). "CMB multipole measurements in the presence of foregrounds". Physical Review D (Submitted manuscript). 74 (2): 023005. arXiv: astro-ph/0603369 . Bibcode:2006PhRvD..74b3005D. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.023005. S2CID   5238226.
  108. "Planck shows almost perfect cosmos – plus axis of evil".
  109. "Found: Hawking's initials written into the universe".
  110. Secrest, Nathan J.; Hausegger, Sebastian von; Rameez, Mohamed; Mohayaee, Roya; Sarkar, Subir; Colin, Jacques (2021). "A Test of the Cosmological Principle with Quasars". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 908 (2): L51. arXiv: 2009.14826 . Bibcode:2021ApJ...908L..51S. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdd40 . S2CID   222066749.
  111. Perivolaropoulos, L.; Skara, F. (2022-12-01). "Challenges for ΛCDM: An update". New Astronomy Reviews. 95: 101659. arXiv: 2105.05208 . Bibcode:2022NewAR..9501659P. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659. ISSN   1387-6473.
  112. Krauss, Lawrence M.; Scherrer, Robert J. (2007). "The return of a static universe and the end of cosmology". General Relativity and Gravitation. 39 (10): 1545–1550. arXiv: 0704.0221 . Bibcode:2007GReGr..39.1545K. doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0472-9. S2CID   123442313.
  113. Adams, Fred C.; Laughlin, Gregory (1997). "A dying universe: The long-term fate and evolution of astrophysical objects". Reviews of Modern Physics . 69 (2): 337–372. arXiv: astro-ph/9701131 . Bibcode:1997RvMP...69..337A. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.69.337. S2CID   12173790.
  114. Guillaume, C.-É., 1896, La Nature 24, series 2, p. 234
  115. Lang, Kenneth R.; Gingerich, Owen, eds. (1979-12-31). "45. The Internal Constitution of the Stars". A Source Book in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1900–1975. Harvard University Press. pp. 281–290. doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674366688.c50. ISBN   978-0-674-36668-8.
  116. 1 2 3 Kragh, H. (1999). Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe . Princeton University Press. p.  135. ISBN   978-0-691-00546-1. "In 1946, Robert Dicke and coworkers at MIT tested equipment that could test a cosmic microwave background of intensity corresponding to about 20K in the microwave region. However, they did not refer to such a background, but only to 'radiation from cosmic matter'. Also, this work was unrelated to cosmology and is only mentioned because it suggests that by 1950, detection of the background radiation might have been technically possible, and also because of Dicke's later role in the discovery". See also Dicke, R. H.; et al. (1946). "Atmospheric Absorption Measurements with a Microwave Radiometer". Physical Review . 70 (5–6): 340–348. Bibcode:1946PhRv...70..340D. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.70.340.
  117. George Gamow, The Creation Of The Universe p.50 (Dover reprint of revised 1961 edition) ISBN   0-486-43868-6
  118. Gamow, G. (2004) [1961]. Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe. Courier Dover Publications. p. 40. ISBN   978-0-486-43868-9.
  119. Erwin Finlay-Freundlich, "Ueber die Rotverschiebung der Spektrallinien" (1953) Contributions from the Observatory, University of St. Andrews; no. 4, p. 96–102. Finlay-Freundlich gave two extreme values of 1.9K and 6.0K in Finlay-Freundlich, E.: 1954, "Red shifts in the spectra of celestial bodies", Phil. Mag., Vol. 45, pp. 303–319.
  120. McKellar, A. (1941). "Molecular Lines from the Lowest States of Diatomic Molecules Composed of Atoms Probably Present in Interstellar Space". Publications of the Dominion Astrophysical Observatory. 7 (6). Vancouver, B.C., Canada: 251–272. Bibcode:1941PDAO....7..251M.
  121. Weinberg, Steven (1972). Gravitation and cosmology: principles and applications of the general theory of relativity. New York: Wiley. pp.  514. ISBN   978-0-471-92567-5.
  122. Helge Kragh, Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe (1999) ISBN   0-691-00546-X. "Alpher and Herman first calculated the present temperature of the decoupled primordial radiation in 1948, when they reported a value of 5 K. Although it was not mentioned either then or in later publications that the radiation is in the microwave region, this follows immediately from the temperature ... Alpher and Herman made it clear that what they had called "the temperature in the universe" the previous year referred to a blackbody distributed background radiation quite different from the starlight."
  123. Alpher, Ralph A.; Gamow, George; Herman, Robert (December 1967). "Thermal Cosmic Radiation and the Formation of Protogalaxies". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 58 (6): 2179–2186. Bibcode:1967PNAS...58.2179A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.58.6.2179 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   223817 . PMID   16591578.
  124. Delannoy, J., Denisse, J. F., Le Roux, E., & Morlet, B. (1957). Mesures absolues de faibles densités de flux de rayonnement à 900 MHz. Annales d'Astrophysique, Vol. 20, p. 222, 20, 222.
  125. Shmaonov, T. A. (1957). "Commentary". Pribory I Tekhnika Experimenta (in Russian). 1: 83. doi:10.1016/S0890-5096(06)60772-3.
  126. Naselsky, P. D.; Novikov, D.I.; Novikov, I. D. (2006). The Physics of the Cosmic Microwave Background. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-85550-1.
  127. Doroshkevich, A. G.; Novikov, I.D. (1964). "Mean Density of Radiation in the Metagalaxy and Certain Problems in Relativistic Cosmology". Soviet Physics Doklady . 9 (23): 4292–4298. Bibcode:1999EnST...33.4292W. doi:10.1021/es990537g. S2CID   96773397.
  128. Nobel Prize In Physics: Russia's Missed Opportunities, RIA Novosti, Nov 21, 2006
  129. Sanders, R.; Kahn, J. (13 October 2006). "UC Berkeley, LBNL cosmologist George F. Smoot awarded 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics". UC Berkeley News . Retrieved 2008-12-11.
  130. Kovac, J.M.; et al. (2002). "Detection of polarization in the cosmic microwave background using DASI". Nature (Submitted manuscript). 420 (6917): 772–787. arXiv: astro-ph/0209478 . Bibcode:2002Natur.420..772K. doi:10.1038/nature01269. PMID   12490941. S2CID   4359884.
  131. Readhead, A. C. S.; et al. (2004). "Polarization Observations with the Cosmic Background Imager". Science . 306 (5697): 836–844. arXiv: astro-ph/0409569 . Bibcode:2004Sci...306..836R. doi:10.1126/science.1105598. PMID   15472038. S2CID   9234000.
  132. A. Readhead et al., "Polarization observations with the Cosmic Background Imager", Science 306, 836–844 (2004).
  133. Staff (17 March 2014). "BICEP2 2014 Results Release". National Science Foundation . Retrieved 18 March 2014.
  134. Clavin, Whitney (March 17, 2014). "NASA Technology Views Birth of the Universe". NASA . Retrieved March 17, 2014.
  135. Overbye, Dennis (March 17, 2014). "Space Ripples Reveal Big Bang's Smoking Gun" . The New York Times . Retrieved March 17, 2014.
  136. Overbye, Dennis (March 24, 2014). "Ripples From the Big Bang". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2022-01-01. Retrieved March 24, 2014.
  137. 1 2 Ade, P.A.R. (BICEP2 Collaboration) (2014). "Detection of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2". Physical Review Letters . 112 (24): 241101. arXiv: 1403.3985 . Bibcode:2014PhRvL.112x1101B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.241101. PMID   24996078. S2CID   22780831.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  138. "BICEP2 News | Not Even Wrong".
  139. Overbye, Dennis (June 19, 2014). "Astronomers Hedge on Big Bang Detection Claim". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2022-01-01. Retrieved June 20, 2014.
  140. Amos, Jonathan (June 19, 2014). "Cosmic inflation: Confidence lowered for Big Bang signal". BBC News . Retrieved June 20, 2014.
  141. Cowen, Ron (2015-01-30). "Gravitational waves discovery now officially dead". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.16830. S2CID   124938210.
  142. Planck Collaboration; et al. (2020). "Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 641: A1. arXiv: 1807.06205 . Bibcode:2020A&A...641A...1P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833880. S2CID   119185252.
  143. Planck Collaboration; et al. (2020). "Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 641: A5. arXiv: 1907.12875 . Bibcode:2020A&A...641A...5P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386. S2CID   198985935.
  144. Stargate Universe - Robert Carlyle talks about background radiation and Destiny's mission (Video). YouTube. November 10, 2010. Retrieved 2023-02-28.
  145. Liu, Cixin (2014-09-23). "The Three-Body Problem: "The Universe Flickers"". Tor.com. Retrieved 2023-01-23.
  146. "Astronomy in your wallet - NCCR PlanetS". nccr-planets.ch. Retrieved 2023-01-23.
  147. "WandaVision's 'cosmic microwave background radiation' is real, actually". SYFY Official Site. 2021-02-03. Retrieved 2023-01-23.

Further reading