Future of an expanding universe

Current observations suggest that the expansion of the universe will continue forever. The prevailing theory is that the universe will cool as it expands, eventually becoming too cold to sustain life. For this reason, this future scenario once popularly called "Heat Death" is now known as the "Big Chill" or "Big Freeze". ^{[1] [2]}

If dark energy—represented by the cosmological constant, a constant energy density filling space homogeneously, ^[3] or scalar fields, such as quintessence or moduli, dynamic quantities whose energy density can vary in time and space—accelerates the expansion of the universe, then the space between clusters of galaxies will grow at an increasing rate. Redshift will stretch ancient ambient photons (including gamma rays) to undetectably long wavelengths and low energies. ^[4] Stars are expected to form normally for 10¹² to 10¹⁴ (1–100 trillion) years, but eventually the supply of gas needed for star formation will be exhausted. As existing stars run out of fuel and cease to shine, the universe will slowly and inexorably grow darker. ^{[5] [6]} According to theories that predict proton decay, the stellar remnants left behind will disappear, leaving behind only black holes, which themselves eventually disappear as they emit Hawking radiation. ^[7] Ultimately, if the universe reaches thermodynamic equilibrium, a state in which the temperature approaches a uniform value, no further work will be possible, resulting in a final heat death of the universe. ^[8]

Cosmology

Infinite expansion does not constrain the overall spatial curvature of the universe. It can be open (with negative spatial curvature), flat, or closed (positive spatial curvature), although if it is closed, sufficient dark energy must be present to counteract the gravitational forces or else the universe will end in a Big Crunch. ^[9]

Observations of the Cosmic microwave background by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe and the Planck mission suggest that the universe is spatially flat and has a significant amount of dark energy. ^{[10] [11]} In this case, the universe might continue to expand at an accelerating rate. The acceleration of the universe's expansion has also been confirmed by observations of distant supernovae. ^[9] If, as in the concordance model of physical cosmology (Lambda-cold dark matter or ΛCDM), dark energy is in the form of a cosmological constant, the expansion will eventually become exponential, with the size of the universe doubling at a constant rate.

If the theory of inflation is correct, the universe went through an episode dominated by a different form of dark energy in the first moments of the Big Bang; but inflation ended, indicating an equation of state much more complicated than those assumed so far for present-day dark energy. It is possible that the dark energy equation of state could change again resulting in an event that would have consequences which are extremely difficult to parametrize or predict.^{[ citation needed ]}

Future history

In the 1970s, the future of an expanding universe was studied by the astrophysicist Jamal Islam ^[12] and the physicist Freeman Dyson. ^[13] Then, in their 1999 book The Five Ages of the Universe , the astrophysicists Fred Adams and Gregory Laughlin divided the past and future history of an expanding universe into five eras. The first, the Primordial Era, is the time in the past just after the Big Bang when stars had not yet formed. The second, the Stelliferous Era, includes the present day and all of the stars and galaxies now seen. It is the time during which stars form from collapsing clouds of gas. In the subsequent Degenerate Era, the stars will have burnt out, leaving all stellar-mass objects as stellar remnants—white dwarfs, neutron stars, and black holes. In the Black Hole Era, white dwarfs, neutron stars, and other smaller astronomical objects have been destroyed by proton decay, leaving only black holes. Finally, in the Dark Era, even black holes have disappeared, leaving only a dilute gas of photons and leptons. ^[14]

This future history and the timeline below assume the continued expansion of the universe. If space in the universe begins to contract, subsequent events in the timeline may not occur because the Big Crunch, the collapse of the universe into a hot, dense state similar to that after the Big Bang, will prevail. ^{[14] [15]}

Timeline

For the past, including the Primordial Era, see Chronology of the universe.

See also: Timeline of the far future

The Stelliferous Era

See also: Graphical timeline of the Stelliferous Era

From the present to about 10¹⁴ (100 trillion) years after the Big Bang

An image of many stars. LH 95 star forming region of the Large Magellanic Cloud. The image was taken using the Hubble Space Telescope. Source: European Space Agency (ESA/Hubble)

The observable universe is currently 1.38×10¹⁰ (13.8 billion) years old. ^[16] This time lies within the Stelliferous Era. About 155 million years after the Big Bang, the first star formed. Since then, stars have formed by the collapse of small, dense core regions in large, cold molecular clouds of hydrogen gas. At first, this produces a protostar, which is hot and bright because of energy generated by gravitational contraction. After the protostar contracts for a while, its core could become hot enough to fuse hydrogen, if it exceeds critical mass, a process called 'stellar ignition' occurs, and its lifetime as a star will properly begin. ^[14]

Stars of very low mass will eventually exhaust all their fusible hydrogen and then become helium white dwarfs. ^[17] Stars of low to medium mass, such as our own sun, will expel some of their mass as a planetary nebula and eventually become white dwarfs; more massive stars will explode in a core-collapse supernova, leaving behind neutron stars or black holes. ^[18] In any case, although some of the star's matter may be returned to the interstellar medium, a degenerate remnant will be left behind whose mass is not returned to the interstellar medium. Therefore, the supply of gas available for star formation is steadily being exhausted.

Milky Way Galaxy and the Andromeda Galaxy merge into one

Main article: Andromeda–Milky Way collision

4–8 billion years from now (17.8–21.8 billion years after the Big Bang)

An artistic illustration of what it would look like from Earth during the Milky way-Andromeda galaxy collision event.

The Andromeda Galaxy is approximately 2.5 million light years away from our galaxy, the Milky Way galaxy, and they are moving towards each other at approximately 300 kilometers (186 miles) per second. Approximately five billion years from now, or 19 billion years after the Big Bang, the Milky Way and the Andromeda galaxy will collide with one another and merge into one large galaxy based on current evidence. Up until 2012, there was no way to confirm whether the possible collision was going to happen or not. ^[19] In 2012, researchers came to the conclusion that the collision is definite after using the Hubble Space Telescope between 2002 and 2010 to track the motion of Andromeda. ^[20] This results in the formation of Milkdromeda (also known as Milkomeda).

22 billion years in the future is the earliest possible end of the Universe in the Big Rip scenario, assuming a model of dark energy with w = −1.5. ^{[21] [22]}

False vacuum decay may occur in 20 to 30 billion years if the Higgs field is metastable. ^{[23] [24] [25]}

Coalescence of Local Group and galaxies outside the Local Supercluster are no longer accessible

10¹¹ (100 billion) to 10¹² (1 trillion) years

The galaxies in the Local Group, the cluster of galaxies which includes the Milky Way and the Andromeda Galaxy, are gravitationally bound to each other. It is expected that between 10¹¹ (100 billion) and 10¹² (1 trillion) years from now, their orbits will decay and the entire Local Group will merge into one large galaxy. ^[5]

Assuming that dark energy continues to make the universe expand at an accelerating rate, in about 150 billion years all galaxies outside the Local Supercluster will pass behind the cosmological horizon. It will then be impossible for events in the Local Supercluster to affect other galaxies. Similarly, it will be impossible for events after 150 billion years, as seen by observers in distant galaxies, to affect events in the Local Supercluster. ^[4] However, an observer in the Local Supercluster will continue to see distant galaxies, but events they observe will become exponentially more redshifted as the galaxy approaches the horizon until time in the distant galaxy seems to stop. The observer in the Local Supercluster never observes events after 150 billion years in their local time, and eventually all light and background radiation lying outside the Local Supercluster will appear to blink out as light becomes so redshifted that its wavelength has become longer than the physical diameter of the horizon.

Technically, it will take an infinitely long time for all causal interaction between the Local Supercluster and this light to cease. However, due to the redshifting explained above, the light will not necessarily be observed for an infinite amount of time, and after 150 billion years, no new causal interaction will be observed.

Therefore, after 150 billion years, intergalactic transportation and communication beyond the Local Supercluster becomes causally impossible.

Luminosities of galaxies begin to diminish

8×10¹¹ (800 billion) years

8×10¹¹ (800 billion) years from now, the luminosities of the different galaxies, approximately similar until then to the current ones thanks to the increasing luminosity of the remaining stars as they age, will start to decrease, as the less massive red dwarf stars begin to die as white dwarfs. ^[26]

An illustration of the local group of galaxies.

Galaxies outside the Local Supercluster are no longer detectable

2×10¹² (2 trillion) years

2×10¹² (2 trillion) years from now, all galaxies outside the Local Supercluster will be redshifted to such an extent that even gamma rays they emit will have wavelengths longer than the size of the observable universe of the time. Therefore, these galaxies will no longer be detectable in any way. ^[4]

Degenerate Era

From 10¹⁴ (100 trillion) to 10⁴⁰ (10 duodecillion) years

By 10¹⁴ (100 trillion) years from now, star formation will end, ^[5] leaving all stellar objects in the form of degenerate remnants. If protons do not decay, stellar-mass objects will disappear more slowly, making this era last longer.

Star formation ceases

10^12–14 (1–100 trillion) years

By 10¹⁴ (100 trillion) years from now, star formation will end. This period, known as the "Degenerate Era", will last until the degenerate remnants finally decay. ^[27] The least-massive stars take the longest to exhaust their hydrogen fuel (see stellar evolution). Thus, the longest living stars in the universe are low-mass red dwarfs, with a mass of about 0.08 solar masses (M_☉), which have a lifetime of over 10¹³ (10 trillion) years. ^[28] Coincidentally, this is comparable to the length of time over which star formation takes place. ^[5] Once star formation ends and the least-massive red dwarfs exhaust their fuel, nuclear fusion will cease. The low-mass red dwarfs will cool and become black dwarfs. ^[17] The only objects remaining with more than planetary mass will be brown dwarfs, with mass less than 0.08 M_☉, and degenerate remnants; white dwarfs, produced by stars with initial masses between about 0.08 and 8 solar masses; and neutron stars and black holes, produced by stars with initial masses over 8 M_☉. Most of the mass of this collection, approximately 90%, will be in the form of white dwarfs. ^[6] In the absence of any energy source, all of these formerly luminous bodies will cool and become faint.

The universe will become extremely dark after the last stars burn out. Even so, there can still be occasional light in the universe. One of the ways the universe can be illuminated is if two carbon–oxygen white dwarfs with a combined mass of more than the Chandrasekhar limit of about 1.4 solar masses happen to merge. The resulting object will then undergo runaway thermonuclear fusion, producing a Type Ia supernova and dispelling the darkness of the Degenerate Era for a few weeks. Neutron stars could also collide, forming even brighter supernovae and dispelling up to 6 solar masses of degenerate gas into the interstellar medium. The resulting matter from these supernovae could potentially create new stars. ^{[29] [30]} If the combined mass is not above the Chandrasekhar limit but is larger than the minimum mass to fuse carbon (about 0.9 M_☉), a carbon star could be produced, with a lifetime of around 10⁶ (1 million) years. ^[14] Also, if two helium white dwarfs with a combined mass of at least 0.3 M_☉ collide, a helium star may be produced, with a lifetime of a few hundred million years. ^[14] Finally, brown dwarfs could form new stars by colliding with each other to form red dwarf stars, which can survive for 10¹³ (10 trillion) years, ^{[28] [29]} or by accreting gas at very slow rates from the remaining interstellar medium until they have enough mass to start hydrogen burning as red dwarfs. This process, at least on white dwarfs, could induce Type Ia supernovae. ^[31]

Planets fall or are flung from orbits by a close encounter with another star

10¹⁵ (1 quadrillion) years

Over time, the orbits of planets will decay due to gravitational radiation, or planets will be ejected from their local systems by gravitational perturbations caused by encounters with another stellar remnant. ^[32]

Stellar remnants escape galaxies or fall into black holes

10¹⁹ to 10²⁰ (10 to 100 quintillion) years

Over time, objects in a galaxy exchange kinetic energy in a process called dynamical relaxation, making their velocity distribution approach the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution. ^[33] Dynamical relaxation can proceed either by close encounters of two stars or by less violent but more frequent distant encounters. ^[34] In the case of a close encounter, two brown dwarfs or stellar remnants will pass close to each other. When this happens, the trajectories of the objects involved in the close encounter change slightly, in such a way that their kinetic energies are more nearly equal than before. After a large number of encounters, then, lighter objects tend to gain speed while the heavier objects lose it. ^[14]

Because of dynamical relaxation, some objects will gain just enough energy to reach galactic escape velocity and depart the galaxy, leaving behind a smaller, denser galaxy. Since encounters are more frequent in this denser galaxy, the process then accelerates. The result is that most objects (90% to 99%) are ejected from the galaxy, leaving a small fraction (maybe 1% to 10%) which fall into the central supermassive black hole. ^{[5] [14]} It has been suggested that the matter of the fallen remnants will form an accretion disk around it that will create a quasar, as long as enough matter is present there. ^[35]

Possible ionization of matter

>10²³ years from now

In an expanding universe with decreasing density and non-zero cosmological constant, matter density would reach zero, resulting in most matter except black dwarfs, neutron stars, black holes, and planets ionizing and dissipating at thermal equilibrium. ^[36]

Future with proton decay

The following timeline assumes that protons do decay.

Chance: 10³² (100 nonillion) – 10⁴² years (1 tredecillion)

The subsequent evolution of the universe depends on the possibility and rate of proton decay. Experimental evidence shows that if the proton is unstable, it has a half-life of at least 10³⁵ years. ^[37] Some of the Grand Unified theories (GUTs) predict long-term proton instability between 10³² and 10³⁸ years, with the upper bound on standard (non-supersymmetry) proton decay at 1.4×10³⁶ years and an overall upper limit maximum for any proton decay (including supersymmetry models) at 6×10⁴² years. ^{[38] [39]} Recent research showing proton lifetime (if unstable) at or exceeding 10³⁶–10³⁷ year range rules out simpler GUTs and most non-supersymmetry models.

Nucleons start to decay

See also: Nucleon

Neutrons bound into nuclei are also suspected to decay with a half-life comparable to that of protons. Planets (substellar objects) would decay in a simple cascade process from heavier elements to hydrogen and finally to photons and leptons while radiating energy. ^[40]

If the proton does not decay at all, then stellar objects would still disappear, but more slowly. See § Future without proton decay below.

Shorter or longer proton half-lives will accelerate or decelerate the process. This means that after 10⁴⁰ years (the maximum proton half-life used by Adams & Laughlin (1997)), one-half of all baryonic matter will have been converted into gamma ray photons and leptons through proton decay.

All nucleons decay

10⁴³ (10 tredecillion) years

Given our assumed half-life of the proton, nucleons (protons and bound neutrons) will have undergone roughly 1,000 half-lives by the time the universe is 10⁴³ years old. This means that there will be roughly 0.5^1,000 (approximately 10⁻³⁰¹) as many nucleons; as there are an estimated 10⁸⁰ protons currently in the universe, ^[41] none will remain at the end of the Degenerate Age. Effectively, all baryonic matter will have been changed into photons and leptons. Some models predict the formation of stable positronium atoms with diameters greater than the observable universe's current diameter (roughly 6 ×10³⁴ metres) ^[42] in 10⁹⁸ years, and that these will in turn decay to gamma radiation in 10¹⁷⁶ years. ^{[5] [6]}

Supermassive black holes are expected to outlast proton decay, but will eventually evaporate completely.

If protons decay on higher-order nuclear processes

Chance: 10⁷⁶ to 10²²⁰ years

If the proton does not decay according to the theories described above, then the Degenerate Era will last longer, and will overlap or surpass the Black Hole Era. On a time scale of 10⁶⁵ years solid matter is theorized to potentially rearrange its atoms and molecules via quantum tunneling, and may behave as liquid and become smooth spheres due to diffusion and gravity. ^[13] Degenerate stellar objects can potentially still experience proton decay, for example via processes involving the Adler–Bell–Jackiw anomaly, virtual black holes, or higher-dimension supersymmetry possibly with a half-life of under 10²²⁰ years. ^[5]

>10¹⁴⁵ years from now

2018 estimate of Standard Model lifetime before collapse of a false vacuum; 95% confidence interval is 10⁶⁵ to 10⁷²⁵ years due in part to uncertainty about the top quark mass. ^[43]

>10²⁰⁰ years from now

Although protons are stable in standard model physics, a quantum anomaly may exist on the electroweak level, which can cause groups of baryons (protons and neutrons) to annihilate into antileptons via the sphaleron transition. ^[44] Such baryon/lepton violations have a number of 3 and can only occur in multiples or groups of three baryons, which can restrict or prohibit such events. No experimental evidence of sphalerons has yet been observed at low energy levels, though they are believed to occur regularly at high energies and temperatures.

Photons, electrons, positrons, and neutrinos are all that remain after the last supermassive black holes evaporate.

Black Hole Era

10⁴³ (10 tredecillion) years to approximately 10¹⁰⁰ (1 googol) years, up to 10¹¹⁰ years for the largest supermassive black holes

After 10⁴³ years, black holes will dominate the universe. They will slowly evaporate via Hawking radiation. ^[5]  A black hole with a mass of around 1 M_☉ will vanish in around 2×10⁶⁴ years. As the lifetime of a black hole is proportional to the cube of its mass, more massive black holes take longer to decay. A supermassive black hole with a mass of 10¹¹ (100 billion) M_☉ will evaporate in around 2×10⁹³ years. ^[45]

The largest black holes in the universe are predicted to continue to grow. Larger black holes of up to 10¹⁴ (100 trillion) M_☉ may form during the collapse of superclusters of galaxies. Even these would evaporate over a timescale of 10^{109 [46]} to 10¹¹⁰ years.

Hawking radiation has a thermal spectrum. During most of a black hole's lifetime, the radiation has a low temperature and is mainly in the form of massless particles such as photons and hypothetical gravitons. As the black hole's mass decreases, its temperature increases, becoming comparable to the Sun's by the time the black hole mass has decreased to 10¹⁹ kilograms. The hole then provides a temporary source of light during the general darkness of the Black Hole Era. During the last stages of its evaporation, a black hole will emit not only massless particles, but also heavier particles, such as electrons, positrons, protons, and antiprotons. ^[14]

Dark Era and Photon Age

From 10¹⁰⁰ years (10 duotrigintillion years or 1 googol years) and beyond

After all the black holes have evaporated (and after all the ordinary matter made of protons has disintegrated, if protons are unstable), the universe will be nearly empty. Photons, leptons, baryons, neutrinos, electrons, and positrons will fly from place to place, hardly ever encountering each other. Gravitationally, the universe will be dominated by dark matter, electrons, and positrons (not protons). ^[47]

By this era, with only very diffuse matter remaining, activity in the universe will eventually tail off dramatically (compared with previous eras), with very low energy levels and very large time scales, with events taking a very long time to happen if they ever happen at all. Electrons and positrons drifting through space will encounter one another and occasionally form positronium atoms. These structures are unstable, however, and their constituent particles must eventually annihilate. However, most electrons and positrons will remain unbound. ^[48] Other low-level annihilation events will also take place, albeit extremely slowly. The universe now reaches an extremely low-energy state.

Future without proton decay

If protons do not decay, stellar-mass objects will still become black holes, although even more slowly. The following timeline that assumes proton decay does not take place.

10¹⁶¹ years from now

2018 estimate of Standard Model lifetime before collapse of a false vacuum; 95% confidence interval is 10⁶⁵ to 10¹³⁸³ years due in part to uncertainty about the top quark mass. ^{[43] [note 1]}

Degenerate Era

Matter decays into iron

10¹¹⁰⁰ to 10³²⁰⁰⁰ years from now

All matter will slowly decay into iron which will take from 10 to 10 years.

In 10¹⁵⁰⁰ years, cold fusion occurring via quantum tunneling should make the light nuclei in stellar-mass objects fuse into iron-56 nuclei (see isotopes of iron). Fission and alpha particle emission should make heavy nuclei also decay to iron, leaving stellar-mass objects as cold spheres of iron, called iron stars. ^[13] Before this happens, however, in some black dwarfs the process is expected to lower their Chandrasekhar limit resulting in a supernova in 10¹¹⁰⁰ years. Non-degenerate silicon has been calculated to tunnel to iron in approximately 10³²⁰⁰⁰ years. ^[49]

Black Hole Era

Collapse of iron stars to black holes

10¹⁰³⁰ to 10¹⁰¹⁰⁵ years from now

Quantum tunneling should also turn large objects into black holes, which (on these timescales) will instantaneously evaporate into subatomic particles. Depending on the assumptions made, the time this takes to happen can be calculated as from 10¹⁰²⁶ years to 10¹⁰⁷⁶ years. Quantum tunneling may also make iron stars collapse into neutron stars in around 10¹⁰⁷⁶ years. ^[13]

Dark Era (without proton decay)

10¹⁰¹⁰⁵ to 10¹⁰¹²⁰ years from now

With black holes having evaporated, nearly all baryonic matter will have now decayed into subatomic particles (electrons, neutrons, protons, and quarks). The universe is now an almost pure vacuum (possibly accompanied with the presence of a false vacuum). The expansion of the universe slowly causes itself to cool down to absolute zero. The universe now reaches an even lower energy state than the earlier one mentioned. ^{[50] [51]}

Beyond

See also: Ultimate fate of the universe

Beyond 10²⁵⁰⁰ years if proton decay occurs, or 10¹⁰⁷⁶ years without proton decay

Whatever event happens beyond this era is highly speculative. It is possible that a Big Rip event may occur far off into the future. ^{[52] [53]} This singularity would take place at a finite scale factor.

If the current vacuum state is a false vacuum, the vacuum may decay into an even lower-energy state. ^[54]

Presumably, extreme low-energy states imply that localized quantum events become major macroscopic phenomena rather than negligible microscopic events because even the smallest perturbations make the biggest difference in this era, so there is no telling what will or might happen to space or time. It is perceived that the laws of "macro-physics" will break down, and the laws of quantum physics will prevail. ^[8]

The universe could possibly avoid eternal heat death through random quantum tunneling and quantum fluctuations, given the non-zero probability of producing a new Big Bang creating a new universe in roughly 10¹⁰¹⁰⁵⁶ years. ^[55]

Over an infinite amount of time, there could also be a spontaneous entropy decrease, by a Poincaré recurrence or through thermal fluctuations (see also fluctuation theorem). ^{[56] [57] [58]}

Massive black dwarfs could also potentially explode into supernovae after up to 10³²⁰⁰⁰ years, assuming protons do not decay. ^[59]

The possibilities above are based on a simple form of dark energy. However, the physics of dark energy are still a very speculative area of research, and the actual form of dark energy could be much more complex.

Graphical timelines

Main article: Graphical timeline from Big Bang to Heat Death

See also: Graphical timeline of the universe and Graphical timeline of the Big Bang

If protons decay:

If protons don't decay:

See also

• Big Bounce  – Model for the origin of the universe
• Big Crunch  – Hypothetical scenario for the ultimate fate of the universe
• Big Rip  – Cosmological model
• Chronology of the universe  – History and future of the universe
• Cyclic model  – Cosmological models involving indefinite, self-sustaining cycles
• Dyson's eternal intelligence  – Hypothetical concept in astrophysics
• Final anthropic principle  – American physicistPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
• Graphical timeline from Big Bang to Heat Death  – Visual representation of the universe's past, present, and future. This timeline uses the double-logarithmic scale for comparison with the graphical timeline included in this article.
• Graphical timeline of the Big Bang  – Logarithmic chronology of the event that began the Universe
• Graphical timeline of the Stelliferous Era
• Graphical timeline of the universe  – Visual representation of the universe's past, present, and futurePages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets. This timeline uses the more intuitive linear time, for comparison with this article.
• The Last Question – A short story by Isaac Asimov which considers the inevitable outcome of heat death in the universe and how it may be reversed.
• Heat death of the universe  – Possible fate of the universe
• Timeline of the far future  – Scientific projections regarding the far future
• Ultimate fate of the universe  – Theories about the end of the universe

Notes

1. Manuscript was updated after publication; lifetime numbers are taken from the latest revision at https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08124.

References

1. Adams, Fred C.; Laughlin, Gregory (1 April 1997). "A dying universe: the long-term fate and evolutionof astrophysical objects" (PDF). Reviews of Modern Physics. 69 (2): 337–372. arXiv: astro-ph/9701131 . Bibcode:1997RvMP...69..337A. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.69.337. ISSN   0034-6861. Archived from the original on 17 May 2021.
2. "What Is the Ultimate Fate of the Universe?". WMAP's Universe. NASA. 29 June 2015. Retrieved 19 February 2023.
3. Carroll, Sean M. (2001). "The cosmological constant". Living Reviews in Relativity. 4 (1): 1. arXiv: astro-ph/0004075 . Bibcode:2001LRR.....4....1C. doi: 10.12942/lrr-2001-1 . PMC   5256042 . PMID   28179856.
4. Krauss, Lawrence M.; Starkman, Glenn D. (2000). "Life, the Universe, and Nothing: Life and Death in an Ever-expanding Universe". Astrophysical Journal. 531 (1): 22–30. arXiv: astro-ph/9902189 . Bibcode:2000ApJ...531...22K. doi:10.1086/308434. S2CID   18442980.
5. Adams, Fred C.; Laughlin, Gregory (1997). "A dying universe: the long-term fate and evolution of astrophysical objects". Reviews of Modern Physics. 69 (2): 337–372. arXiv: astro-ph/9701131 . Bibcode:1997RvMP...69..337A. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.69.337. S2CID   12173790.
6. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §IIE.
7. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §IV.
8. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §VID.
9. Levin, Frank S. (2007). Calibrating the cosmos: how cosmology explains our big bang universe. Astronomers' universe. New York: Springer. ISBN   978-0-387-30778-7.
10. etal (2008). "Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps, and Basic Results" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 180 (2): 225–245. arXiv: 0803.0732 . Bibcode:2009ApJS..180..225H. doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/225 . ISSN   0067-0049.
11. Planck Collaboration; et al. (1 September 2016). "Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 594: A13. arXiv: 1502.01589 . Bibcode:2016A&A...594A..13P. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 .
12. Islam, Jamal N. (March 1977). "Possible Ultimate Fate of the Universe". Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 18: 3. Bibcode:1977QJRAS..18....3I.
13. Dyson, Freeman J. (1979). "Time without end: Physics and biology in an open universe". Reviews of Modern Physics. 51 (3): 447–460. Bibcode:1979RvMP...51..447D. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.447.
14. Fred Adams and Greg Laughlin, The Five Ages of the Universe , New York: The Free Press, 1999, ISBN   0-684-85422-8.
15. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §VA.
16. Planck collaboration (2013). "Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 571: A16. arXiv: 1303.5076 . Bibcode:2014A&A...571A..16P. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321591. S2CID   118349591.
17. Laughlin, Gregory; Bodenheimer, Peter; Adams, Fred C. (1997). "The End of the Main Sequence". The Astrophysical Journal. 482 (1): 420–432. Bibcode:1997ApJ...482..420L. doi: 10.1086/304125 .
18. Heger, A.; Fryer, C. L.; Woosley, S. E.; Langer, N.; Hartmann, D. H. (2003). "How Massive Single Stars End Their Life". Astrophysical Journal. 591 (1): 288–300. arXiv: astro-ph/0212469 . Bibcode:2003ApJ...591..288H. doi:10.1086/375341. S2CID   59065632.
19. van der Marel, G.; et al. (2012). "The M31 Velocity Vector. III. Future Milky Way M31-M33 Orbital Evolution, Merging, and Fate of the Sun". The Astrophysical Journal. 753 (1): 9. arXiv: 1205.6865 . Bibcode:2012ApJ...753....9V. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/9. S2CID   53071454.
20. Cowen, R. (31 May 2012). "Andromeda on collision course with the Milky Way". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2012.10765. S2CID   124815138.
21. "Universe may end in a Big Rip". CERN Courier. 30 April 2003.
22. Siegel, Ethan. "Ask Ethan: Could The Universe Be Torn Apart In A Big Rip?". Forbes.
23. Crane, Leah. "Physicists have a massive problem as Higgs boson refuses to misbehave". New Scientist.
24. "The Higgs boson makes the universe stable – just. Coincidence?". New Scientist.
25. "Death by Higgs rids cosmos of space brain threat". New Scientist.
26. Adams, F. C.; Graves, G. J. M.; Laughlin, G. (December 2004). García-Segura, G.; Tenorio-Tagle, G.; Franco, J.; Yorke (eds.). "Gravitational Collapse: From Massive Stars to Planets. / First Astrophysics meeting of the Observatorio Astronomico Nacional. / A meeting to celebrate Peter Bodenheimer for his outstanding contributions to Astrophysics: Red Dwarfs and the End of the Main Sequence". Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica, Serie de Conferencias. 22: 46–149. Bibcode:2004RMxAC..22...46A. See Fig. 3.
27. Adams & Laughlin (1997), § III–IV.
28. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §IIA and Figure 1.
29. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §IIIC.
30. Richmond, M. "The Future of the Universe". Physics 240. Rochester Institute of Technology . Retrieved 19 February 2023.
31. Cirkovic, M. M. (December 2005). "Brown Dwarf Accretion: Nonconventional Star Formation over Very Long Timescales". Serbian Astronomical Journal. 171 (171): 11–17. Bibcode:2005SerAJ.171...11C. doi: 10.2298/SAJ0571011C .
32. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §IIIF, Table I.
33. p. 428, A deep focus on NGC 1883, A. L. Tadross, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India33, No. 4 (December 2005), pp. 421–431, Bibcode : 2005BASI...33..421T.
34. Reading notes Archived 3 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine , Liliya L. R. Williams, Astrophysics II: Galactic and Extragalactic Astronomy, University of Minnesota. Retrieved 20 July 2008.
35. Darling, David J. (1989). Deep time. New York, N.Y: Delacorte Press. ISBN   978-0-440-50195-4.
36. Baez, John (7 February 2016). "The End of the Universe". math.ucr.edu. Retrieved 19 February 2023.
37. Senjanovic, Goran; Alverson, George; Nath, Pran; Nelson, Brent (2009). "Proton decay and grand unification". The 17th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions. AIP Conference Proceedings: 131–141. arXiv: 0912.5375 . doi:10.1063/1.3327552.
38. Pavel (2007). "Upper Bound on the Proton Lifetime and the Minimal Non-SUSY Grand Unified Theory". AIP Conference Proceedings. 903: 385–388. arXiv: hep-ph/0606279 . Bibcode:2007AIPC..903..385P. doi:10.1063/1.2735205. S2CID   119379228.
39. Nath, Pran; Perez, Pavel Fileviez (April 2007). "Proton stability in grand unified theories, in strings, and in branes". Physics Reports. 441 (5–6): 191–317. arXiv: hep-ph/0601023 . Bibcode:2007PhR...441..191N. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.02.010. S2CID   119542637.
40. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §IV-H.
41. deGrasse Tyson, Neil; Tsun-Chu Liu, Charles; Irion, Robert (2000). "Solution, exercise 17". One Universe: At Home in the Cosmos. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press. ISBN   0-309-06488-0.
42. Page, Don N.; McKee, M. Randall (1981). "Matter annihilation in the late universe". Physical Review D. 24 (6): 1458–1469. Bibcode:1981PhRvD..24.1458P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.24.1458.
43. Andreassen, Anders; Frost, William; Schwartz, Matthew D. (12 March 2018). "Scale-invariant instantons and the complete lifetime of the standard model". Physical Review D. 97 (5): 056006. arXiv: 1707.08124 . Bibcode:2018PhRvD..97e6006A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.056006. S2CID   118843387.
44. 't Hooft, T. (1976). "Symmetry breaking through Bell-Jackiw anomalies". Physical Review Letters. 37 (1): 8. Bibcode:1976PhRvL..37....8T. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.37.8.
45. Page, Don N. (1976). "Particle emission rates from a black hole: Massless particles from an uncharged, nonrotating hole". Physical Review D. 13 (2): 198–206. Bibcode:1976PhRvD..13..198P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.198.. See in particular equation (27).
46. Frautschi, S. (1982). "Entropy in an expanding universe". Science. 217 (4560): 593–599. Bibcode:1982Sci...217..593F. doi:10.1126/science.217.4560.593. PMID   17817517. S2CID   27717447. See page 596: table 1 and section "black hole decay" and previous sentence on that page

    Since we have assumed a maximum scale of gravitational binding – for instance, superclusters of galaxies – black hole formation eventually comes to an end in our model, with masses of up to 10¹⁴M_☉ ... the timescale for black holes to radiate away all their energy ranges ... to 10¹⁰⁹ years for black holes of up to 10¹⁴M_☉.

47. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §VD.
48. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §VF3.
49. Caplan, M. E. (7 August 2020). "Black Dwarf Supernova in the Far Future". MNRAS . 497 (1–6): 4357–4362. arXiv: 2008.02296 . Bibcode:2020MNRAS.497.4357C. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2262 . S2CID   221005728.
50. "The Five Ages of the Universe". The New York Times.
51. Dicus, Duane A.; Letaw, John R.; Teplitz, Doris C.; Teplitz, Vigdor L. (1983). "The Future of the Universe". Scientific American. 248 (3): 90–101. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0383-90. JSTOR   24968855 – via JSTOR.
52. Caldwell, Robert R.; Kamionkowski, Marc; Weinberg, Nevin N. (2003). "Phantom energy and cosmic doomsday". Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (7): 071301. arXiv: astro-ph/0302506 . Bibcode:2003PhRvL..91g1301C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.071301. PMID   12935004. S2CID   119498512.
53. Bouhmadi-López, Mariam; González-Díaz, Pedro F.; Martín-Moruno, Prado (2008). "Worse than a big rip?". Physics Letters B. 659 (1–2): 1–5. arXiv: gr-qc/0612135 . Bibcode:2008PhLB..659....1B. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.10.079. S2CID   119487735.
54. Adams & Laughlin (1997), §VE.
55. Carroll, Sean M.; Chen, Jennifer (2004). "Spontaneous Inflation and Origin of the Arrow of Time". arXiv: hep-th/0410270 .
56. Tegmark, Max (2003). "Parallel Universes". Scientific American. 288 (5): 40–51. arXiv: astro-ph/0302131 . Bibcode:2003SciAm.288e..40T. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0503-40.
57. Werlang, T.; Ribeiro, G. A. P.; Rigolin, Gustavo (2013). "Interplay between quantum phase transitions and the behavior of quantum correlations at finite temperatures". International Journal of Modern Physics B. 27. arXiv: 1205.1046 . Bibcode:2013IJMPB..2745032W. doi:10.1142/S021797921345032X. S2CID   119264198.
58. Xing, Xiu-San (2007). "Spontaneous entropy decrease and its statistical formula". arXiv: 0710.4624 [cond-mat.stat-mech].
59. Caplan, M. E. (2020). "Black dwarf supernova in the far future". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 497 (4): 4357–4362. arXiv: 2008.02296 . Bibcode:2020MNRAS.497.4357C. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2262 . S2CID   221005728.

External links

• A Journey to the End of Time (4K) on YouTube by melodysheep