Big Bounce

Last updated

The Big Bounce hypothesis is a cosmological model for the origin of the known universe. It was originally suggested as a phase of the cyclic model or oscillatory universe interpretation of the Big Bang, where the first cosmological event was the result of the collapse of a previous universe. [1] [2] [3] [4] It receded from serious consideration in the early 1980s after inflation theory emerged as a solution to the horizon problem, which had arisen from advances in observations revealing the large-scale structure of the universe.

Contents

Inflation was found to be inevitably eternal, creating an infinity of different universes with typically different properties, suggesting that the properties of the observable universe are a matter of chance. [5] An alternative concept that included a Big Bounce was conceived as a predictive and falsifiable possible solution to the horizon problem. [6] Investigation continued as of 2022. [7] [8] [9] [10]

Expansion and contraction

The concept of the Big Bounce envisions the Big Bang as the beginning of a period of expansion that followed a period of contraction. [11] In this view, one could talk of a "Big Crunch" followed by a "Big Bang" or, more simply, a "Big Bounce". This concept suggests that we could exist at any point in an infinite sequence of universes, or conversely, the current universe could be the very first iteration. However, if the condition of the interval phase "between bounces"—considered the "hypothesis of the primeval atom"—is taken into full contingency, such enumeration may be meaningless because that condition could represent a singularity in time at each instance if such perpetual repeats (cycles) were absolute and undifferentiated.

The main idea behind the quantum theory of a Big Bounce is that, as density approaches infinity, the behavior of quantum foam changes. All the so-called fundamental physical constants, including the speed of light in vacuum, need not remain constant during a Big Crunch, especially in the time interval smaller than that in which measurement may never be possible (one unit of Planck time, roughly 10−43 seconds) spanning or bracketing the point of inflection.

History

Big Bounce models were endorsed on largely aesthetic grounds by cosmologists including Willem de Sitter, Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, George McVittie, and George Gamow (who stressed that "from the physical point of view we must forget entirely about the precollapse period"). [12]

By the early 1980s, the advancing precision and scope of observational cosmology had revealed that the large-scale structure of the universe is flat, homogeneous, and isotropic, a finding later accepted as the cosmological principle to apply at scales beyond roughly 300 million light-years. This led cosmologists to seek an explanation to the horizon problem, which questioned how distant regions of the universe could have identical properties without ever being in light-like communication. A solution was proposed to be a period of exponential expansion of space in the early universe, which formed the basis of what became known as inflation theory. Following the brief inflationary period, the universe continues to expand at a slower rate.

Various formulations of inflation theory and their detailed implications became the subject of intense theoretical study. Without a compelling alternative, inflation became the leading solution to the horizon problem.

The phrase "Big Bounce" appeared in scientific literature in 1987, when it was first used in the title of a pair of articles (in German) in Stern und Weltraum by Wolfgang Priester and Hans-Joachim Blome. [13] It reappeared in 1988 in Iosif Rozental's Big Bang, Big Bounce, a revised English-language translation of a Russian-language book (by a different title), and in a 1991 English-language article by Priester and Blome in Astronomy and Astrophysics. The phrase originated as the title of a novel by Elmore Leonard in 1969, shortly after increased public awareness of the Big Bang model with of the discovery of the cosmic microwave background by Penzias and Wilson in 1965.

The idea of the existence of a big bounce in the very early universe has found diverse support in works based on loop quantum gravity. In loop quantum cosmology, a branch of loop quantum gravity, the big bounce was first discovered in February 2006 for isotropic and homogeneous models by Abhay Ashtekar, Tomasz Pawlowski, and Parampreet Singh at Pennsylvania State University. [14] This result has been generalized to various other models by different groups, and includes the case of spatial curvature, cosmological constant, anisotropies, and Fock quantized inhomogeneities. [15]

Martin Bojowald, an assistant professor of physics at Pennsylvania State University, published a study in July 2007 detailing work related to loop quantum gravity that claimed to mathematically solve the time before the Big Bang, which would give new weight to the oscillatory universe and Big Bounce theories. [16]

One of the main problems with the Big Bang theory is that there is a singularity of zero volume and infinite energy at the moment of the Big Bang. This is normally interpreted as a breakdown of physics as we know it; in this case, of the theory of general relativity. This is why one expects quantum effects to become important and avoid a singularity.

However, research in loop quantum cosmology purported to show that a previously existing universe collapses not to a singularity, but to a point where the quantum effects of gravity become so strongly repulsive that the universe rebounds back out, forming a new branch. Throughout this collapse and bounce, the evolution is unitary.

Bojowald also claimed that some properties of the universe that collapsed to form ours can be determined; however, other properties are not determinable due to some uncertainty principle. This result has been disputed by different groups, which show that due to restrictions on fluctuations stemming from the uncertainty principle, there are strong constraints on the change in relative fluctuations across the bounce. [17] [18]

While the existence of the Big Bounce has still to be demonstrated from loop quantum gravity, the robustness of its main features has been confirmed using exact results [19] and several studies involving numerical simulations using high performance computing in loop quantum cosmology.

In 2006, it was proposed that the application of loop quantum gravity techniques to Big Bang cosmology can lead to a bounce that need not be cyclic. [20]

In 2010, Roger Penrose advanced a general relativity-based theory which he called the "conformal cyclic cosmology". The theory explains that the universe will expand until all matter decays and ultimately turns to light. Since nothing in the universe would have any time or distance scale associated with it, the universe becomes identical with the Big Bang, resulting in a type of Big Crunch that becomes the next Big Bang, thus perpetuating the next cycle. [21]

In 2011, Nikodem Popławski showed that a nonsingular Big Bounce appears naturally in the Einstein–Cartan–Sciama–Kibble theory of gravity. [22] This theory extends general relativity by removing a constraint of the symmetry of the affine connection and regarding its antisymmetric part, the torsion tensor, as a dynamical variable. The minimal coupling between torsion and Dirac spinors generates a spin-spin interaction which is significant in fermionic matter at extremely high densities. Such an interaction avoids the unphysical Big Bang singularity, replacing it with a cusp-like bounce at a finite minimum scale factor, before which the universe was contracting. This scenario also explains why the present Universe at the largest scales appears spatially flat, homogeneous, and isotropic, providing a physical alternative to cosmic inflation.

In 2012, a new theory of a nonsingular Big Bounce was constructed within the frame of standard Einstein gravity. [23] This theory combines the benefits of matter bounce and ekpyrotic cosmology. Particularly, in the homogeneous and isotropic background cosmological solution, the BKL instability is unstable to the growth of anisotropic stress, which is resolved in this theory. Moreover, curvature perturbations seeded in matter contraction can form a nearly scale-invariant primordial power spectrum and thus provide a consistent mechanism to explain the cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations.

A few sources argue that distant supermassive black holes whose large size is hard to explain so soon after the Big Bang, such as ULAS J1342+0928, [24] may be evidence for a Big Bounce, with these supermassive black holes being formed before the Big Bounce. [25] [26]

Critics

According to a study published in Physical Review Letters in May 2023, the Big Bounce should have left marks in the primordial light, known as the cosmic microwave background (CMB), but comparing observations conducted by the Planck satellite with the simulated CMB in the case the Universe bounced on itself only once, that particular bounce signature was not found. [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Physical cosmology</span> Branch of cosmology which studies mathematical models of the universe

Physical cosmology is a branch of cosmology concerned with the study of cosmological models. A cosmological model, or simply cosmology, provides a description of the largest-scale structures and dynamics of the universe and allows study of fundamental questions about its origin, structure, evolution, and ultimate fate. Cosmology as a science originated with the Copernican principle, which implies that celestial bodies obey identical physical laws to those on Earth, and Newtonian mechanics, which first allowed those physical laws to be understood.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cosmic inflation</span> Theory of rapid universe expansion

In physical cosmology, cosmic inflation, cosmological inflation, or just inflation, is a theory of exponential expansion of space in the very early universe. Following the inflationary period, the universe continued to expand, but at a slower rate. The re-acceleration of this slowing expansion due to dark energy began after the universe was already over 7.7 billion years old.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General relativity</span> Theory of gravitation as curved spacetime

General relativity, also known as the general theory of relativity, and as Einstein's theory of gravity, is the geometric theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1915 and is the current description of gravitation in modern physics. General relativity generalizes special relativity and refines Newton's law of universal gravitation, providing a unified description of gravity as a geometric property of space and time, or four-dimensional spacetime. In particular, the curvature of spacetime is directly related to the energy and momentum of whatever present matter and radiation. The relation is specified by the Einstein field equations, a system of second-order partial differential equations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum gravity</span> Description of gravity using discrete values

Quantum gravity (QG) is a field of theoretical physics that seeks to describe gravity according to the principles of quantum mechanics. It deals with environments in which neither gravitational nor quantum effects can be ignored, such as in the vicinity of black holes or similar compact astrophysical objects, as well as in the early stages of the universe moments after the Big Bang.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wormhole</span> Hypothetical topological feature of spacetime

A wormhole is a hypothetical structure which connects disparate points in spacetime. It may be visualized as a tunnel with two ends at separate points in spacetime. Wormholes are based on a special solution of the Einstein field equations. Specifically, they are a transcendental bijection of the spacetime continuum, an asymptotic projection of the Calabi–Yau manifold manifesting itself in anti-de Sitter space.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gravitational singularity</span> Condition in which spacetime itself breaks down

A gravitational singularity, spacetime singularity or simply singularity is a theoretical condition in which gravity is predicted to be so intense that spacetime itself would break down catastrophically. As such, a singularity is by definition no longer part of the regular spacetime and cannot be determined by "where" or "when". Gravitational singularities exist at a junction between general relativity and quantum mechanics; therefore, the properties of the singularity cannot be described without an established theory of quantum gravity. Trying to find a complete and precise definition of singularities in the theory of general relativity, the current best theory of gravity, remains a difficult problem. A singularity in general relativity can be defined by the scalar invariant curvature becoming infinite or, better, by a geodesic being incomplete.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Loop quantum gravity</span> Theory of quantum gravity, merging quantum mechanics and general relativity

Loop quantum gravity (LQG) is a theory of quantum gravity that incorporates matter of the Standard Model into the framework established for the intrinsic quantum gravity case. It is an attempt to develop a quantum theory of gravity based directly on Albert Einstein's geometric formulation rather than the treatment of gravity as a mysterious mechanism (force). As a theory, LQG postulates that the structure of space and time is composed of finite loops woven into an extremely fine fabric or network. These networks of loops are called spin networks. The evolution of a spin network, or spin foam, has a scale on the order of a Planck length, approximately 10−35 meters, and smaller scales are meaningless. Consequently, not just matter, but space itself, prefers an atomic structure.

Hawking radiation is the theoretical emission released outside a black hole's event horizon. This is counterintuitive because once ordinary electromagnetic radiation is inside the event horizon, it cannot escape. It is named after the physicist Stephen Hawking, who developed a theoretical argument for its existence in 1974. Hawking radiation is predicted to be extremely faint and is many orders of magnitude below the current best telescopes' detecting ability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ultimate fate of the universe</span> Theories about the end of the universe

The ultimate fate of the universe is a topic in physical cosmology, whose theoretical restrictions allow possible scenarios for the evolution and ultimate fate of the universe to be described and evaluated. Based on available observational evidence, deciding the fate and evolution of the universe has become a valid cosmological question, being beyond the mostly untestable constraints of mythological or theological beliefs. Several possible futures have been predicted by different scientific hypotheses, including that the universe might have existed for a finite and infinite duration, or towards explaining the manner and circumstances of its beginning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black hole thermodynamics</span> Area of study

In physics, black hole thermodynamics is the area of study that seeks to reconcile the laws of thermodynamics with the existence of black hole event horizons. As the study of the statistical mechanics of black-body radiation led to the development of the theory of quantum mechanics, the effort to understand the statistical mechanics of black holes has had a deep impact upon the understanding of quantum gravity, leading to the formulation of the holographic principle.

In astrophysics, the gravastar is an object hypothesized in a 2006 paper by Pawel O. Mazur and Emil Mottola as an alternative to the black hole theory. It has the usual black hole metric outside of the horizon, but de Sitter metric inside. On the horizon there is a thin shell of matter. This solution to the Einstein equations is stable and has no singularities. Further theoretical considerations of gravastars include the notion of a nestar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cyclic model</span> Cosmological models involving indefinite, self-sustaining cycles

A cyclic model is any of several cosmological models in which the universe follows infinite, or indefinite, self-sustaining cycles. For example, the oscillating universe theory briefly considered by Albert Einstein in 1930 theorized a universe following an eternal series of oscillations, each beginning with a Big Bang and ending with a Big Crunch; in the interim, the universe would expand for a period of time before the gravitational attraction of matter causes it to collapse back in and undergo a bounce.

The Immirzi parameter is a numerical coefficient appearing in loop quantum gravity (LQG), a nonperturbative theory of quantum gravity. The Immirzi parameter measures the size of the quantum of area in Planck units. As a result, its value is currently fixed by matching the semiclassical black hole entropy, as calculated by Stephen Hawking, and the counting of microstates in loop quantum gravity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum cosmology</span> Attempts to develop a quantum mechanical theory of cosmology

Quantum cosmology is the attempt in theoretical physics to develop a quantum theory of the universe. This approach attempts to answer open questions of classical physical cosmology, particularly those related to the first phases of the universe.

An exotic star is a hypothetical compact star composed of exotic matter, and balanced against gravitational collapse by degeneracy pressure or other quantum properties.

Loop quantum cosmology (LQC) is a finite, symmetry-reduced model of loop quantum gravity (LQG) that predicts a "quantum bridge" between contracting and expanding cosmological branches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Group field theory</span> Quantum field theory with a Lie group base manifold

Group field theory (GFT) is a quantum field theory in which the base manifold is taken to be a Lie group. It is closely related to background independent quantum gravity approaches such as loop quantum gravity, the spin foam formalism and causal dynamical triangulation. Its perturbative expansion can be interpreted as spin foams and simplicial pseudo-manifolds (depending on the representation of the fields). Thus, its partition function defines a non-perturbative sum over all simplicial topologies and geometries, giving a path integral formulation of quantum spacetime.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black hole cosmology</span> Cosmological model in which the observable universe is the interior of a black hole

A black hole cosmology is a cosmological model in which the observable universe is the interior of a black hole. Such models were originally proposed by theoretical physicist Raj Kumar Pathria, and concurrently by mathematician I. J. Good.

In theoretical physics, a dynamical horizon (DH) is a local description of evolving black-hole horizons. In the literature there exist two different mathematical formulations of DHs—the 2+2 formulation developed first by Sean Hayward and the 3+1 formulation developed by Abhay Ashtekar and others. It provides a description of a black hole that is evolving. A related formalism, for black holes with zero influx, is an isolated horizon.

Jerzy Lewandowski was a Polish theoretical physicist best known for his extensive research into general relativity and quantum gravity.

References

  1. ↑ Abelev, B.; Adam, J.; Adamová, D.; Aggarwal, M. M.; Aglieri Rinella, G.; Agnello, M.; Agostinelli, A.; Agrawal, N.; Ahammed, Z.; Ahmad, N.; Ahmed, I.; Ahn, S. U.; Ahn, S. A.; Aimo, I.; Aiola, S. (2014-11-10). "Beauty production in pp collisions at s=2.76 TeV measured via semi-electronic decays" (PDF). Physics Letters B. 738: 97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.09.026 . ISSN   0370-2693. S2CID   119489459.
  2. ↑ Novello, M.; Bergliaffa, S. E. Perez (2008-07-01). "Bouncing cosmologies". Physics Reports. 463 (4): 127–213. arXiv: 0802.1634 . Bibcode:2008PhR...463..127N. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.006. ISSN   0370-1573. S2CID   119274449.
  3. ↑ Finelli, Fabio; Brandenberger, Robert (2002-05-15). "Generation of a scale-invariant spectrum of adiabatic fluctuations in cosmological models with a contracting phase". Physical Review D. 65 (10): 103522. arXiv: hep-th/0112249 . Bibcode:2002PhRvD..65j3522F. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.65.103522. S2CID   7262222.
  4. ↑ Ashtekar, Abhay; Pawlowski, Tomasz; Singh, Parampreet (2 October 2006). "Quantum nature of the big bang: Improved dynamics". Physical Review D. 74 (8): 084003. arXiv: gr-qc/0607039 . Bibcode:2006PhRvD..74h4003A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.084003. S2CID   34651070.
  5. ↑ McKee, Maggie (25 September 2014). "Ingenious: Paul J. Steinhardt – The Princeton physicist on what's wrong with inflation theory and his view of the Big Bang". Nautilus. No. 17. NautilusThink Inc. Archived from the original on 23 January 2017. Retrieved 31 March 2017.
  6. ↑ Steinhardt, Paul J.; Turok, Neil (2005). "The cyclic model simplified". New Astronomy Reviews. 49 (2–6): 43–57. arXiv: astro-ph/0404480 . Bibcode:2005NewAR..49...43S. doi:10.1016/j.newar.2005.01.003. ISSN   1387-6473. S2CID   16034194.
  7. ↑ Ijjas, Anna; Steinhardt, Paul J. (January 10, 2022). "Entropy, black holes, and the new cyclic universe". Physics Letters B. 824: 136823. arXiv: 2108.07101 . Bibcode:2022PhLB..82436823I. doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136823 .
  8. ↑ Wood, Charlie (August 4, 2020). "Big Bounce Simulations Challenge the Big Bang". Quanta Magazine.
  9. ↑ Lehners, Jean-Luc; Steinhardt, Paul J. (2013). "Planck 2013 results support the cyclic universe". Physical Review D. 87 (12): 123533. arXiv: 1304.3122 . Bibcode:2013PhRvD..87l3533L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.123533. ISSN   1550-7998. S2CID   76656473.
  10. ↑ Brandenberger, Robert; Peter, Patrick (2017). "Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems". Foundations of Physics. 47 (6): 797–850. arXiv: 1603.05834 . Bibcode:2017FoPh...47..797B. doi:10.1007/s10701-016-0057-0. ISSN   0015-9018. S2CID   118847768.
  11. ↑ Craig, David J. (2018). "Was the Big Bang Really a Big Bounce?". Columbia Magazine. Columbia University. Retrieved July 3, 2023.
  12. ↑ Kragh, Helge (1996). Cosmology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN   978-0-691-00546-1.
  13. ↑ Overduin, Blome & Hoell 2007
  14. ↑ Ashtekar, Abhay; Pawlowski, Tomasz; Singh, Parampreet (12 April 2006). "Quantum Nature of the Big Bang". Physical Review Letters. 96 (14): 141301. arXiv: gr-qc/0602086 . Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96n1301A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.141301. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   16712061. S2CID   3082547.
  15. ↑ Ashtekar, Abhay; Singh, Parampreet (2011-11-07). "Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 28 (21): 213001. arXiv: 1108.0893 . Bibcode:2011CQGra..28u3001A. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/21/213001. ISSN   0264-9381. S2CID   119209230.
  16. ↑ Bojowald, Martin (2007). "What happened before the Big Bang?". Nature Physics. 3 (8): 523–525. Bibcode:2007NatPh...3..523B. doi: 10.1038/nphys654 .
  17. ↑ Corichi, Alejandro; Singh, Parampreet (2008-04-23). "Quantum Bounce and Cosmic Recall". Physical Review Letters. 100 (16): 161302. arXiv: 0710.4543 . Bibcode:2008PhRvL.100p1302C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.161302. PMID   18518182. S2CID   40071231.
  18. ↑ Kamiński, Wojciech; Pawłowski, Tomasz (2010-04-15). "Cosmic recall and the scattering picture of loop quantum cosmology". Physical Review D. 81 (8): 084027. arXiv: 1001.2663 . Bibcode:2010PhRvD..81h4027K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.084027. S2CID   44771809.
  19. ↑ Ashtekar, Abhay; Corichi, Alejandro; Singh, Parampreet (2008). "Robustness of key features of loop quantum cosmology". Physical Review D. 77 (2): 024046. arXiv: 0710.3565 . Bibcode:2008PhRvD..77b4046A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.024046. ISSN   1550-7998. S2CID   118674251.
  20. ↑ "Penn State Researchers Look Beyond The Birth Of The Universe". Science Daily . May 17, 2006. Referring to ( Ashtekar et al. 2006 )
  21. ↑ Penrose, Roger (2011). Cycles of time: an extraordinary new view of the universe (1st ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN   978-0-224-08036-1. OCLC   676726661.
  22. ↑ Popławski, Nikodem (2012). "Nonsingular, big-bounce cosmology from spinor-torsion coupling". Physical Review D. 85 (10): 107502. arXiv: 1111.4595 . Bibcode:2012PhRvD..85j7502P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.107502. ISSN   1550-7998. S2CID   118434253.
  23. ↑ Cai, Yi-Fu; Easson, Damien A; Brandenberger, Robert (2012). "Towards a nonsingular bouncing cosmology". Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics . 2012 (8): 020. arXiv: 1206.2382 . Bibcode:2012JCAP...08..020C. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2012/08/020. ISSN   1475-7516. S2CID   118679321.
  24. ↑ Landau, Elizabeth; Bañados, Eduardo (6 December 2017). "Found: Most Distant Black Hole". NASA . Retrieved 6 December 2017. "This black hole grew far larger than we expected in only 690 million years after the Big Bang, which challenges our theories about how black holes form," said study co-author Daniel Stern of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.
  25. ↑ Seidel, Jamie (7 December 2017). "Black hole at the dawn of time challenges our understanding of how the universe was formed". News Corp Australia. Retrieved 9 December 2017. It had reached its size just 690 million years after the point beyond which there is nothing. The most dominant scientific theory of recent years describes that point as the Big Bang—a spontaneous eruption of reality as we know it out of a quantum singularity. But another idea has recently been gaining weight: that the universe goes through periodic expansions and contractions—resulting in a "Big Bounce". Early black holes have been predicted to be a key telltale as to whether or not the idea may be valid. This one is very big. To get to its size—800 million times more mass than our Sun—it must have swallowed a lot of stuff. ... As far as we understand it, the universe wasn't old enough at that time to generate such a monster.
  26. ↑ "A Black Hole that is more ancient than the Universe" (in Greek). You Magazine (Greece). 8 December 2017. Retrieved 9 December 2017. This new theory that accepts that the Universe is going through periodic expansions and contractions is called "Big Bounce"
  27. ↑ van Tent, Bartjan; Delgado, Paola C. M.; Durrer, Ruth (2023-05-09). "Constraining the Bispectrum from Bouncing Cosmologies with Planck". Physical Review Letters. 130 (19): 191002. arXiv: 2212.05977 . Bibcode:2023PhRvL.130s1002V. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.191002. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   37243637.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.