Tidal disruption event

Last updated
Simulation of a star being disrupted by a supermassive black hole during a tidal disruption event. Tde-simulation.jpg
Simulation of a star being disrupted by a supermassive black hole during a tidal disruption event.

A tidal disruption event (TDE) is a transient astronomical source produced when a star passes so close to a supermassive black hole (SMBH) that it is pulled apart by the black hole's tidal force. [2] [3] The star undergoes spaghettification, producing a tidal stream of material that loops around the black hole. Some portion of the stellar material is captured into orbit, forming an accretion disk around the black hole, which emits electromagnetic radiation. In a small fraction of TDEs, a relativistic jet is also produced. As the material in the disk is gradually consumed by the black hole, the TDE fades over several months or years.

Contents

TDEs were predicted in the 1970s and first observed in the 1990s. Over a hundred have since been observed, with detections at optical, infrared, radio and X-ray wavelengths. Sometimes a star can survive the encounter with an SMBH, leaving a remnant; those events are termed partial TDEs. [4] [5]

History

TDEs were first theorized by Jack G. Hills in 1975. [6] A consequence of a star getting sufficiently close to a SMBH that the tidal forces between the star will overcome the star's self-gravity. In 1988 Martin Rees described how approximately half of the disrupted stellar material will remain bound, eventually accreting onto the black hole and forming a luminous accretion disk. [7]

According to early[ when? ] studies, tidal disruption events are an inevitable consequence of massive black holes' activity hidden in galaxy nuclei. Later theorists concluded that the resulting explosion or flare of radiation from the accretion of the stellar debris could reveal the presence of a dormant black hole in the center of a normal galaxy. [8]

TDEs were first observed in the early 1990s using the X-ray ROSAT All-Sky Survey.[ citation needed ]

Observations

As of May 2024, roughly 100 TDEs are known, [9] [10] [11] and have been discovered through several astronomical methods. such as optical transient surveys including Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) [11] and the All Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN). [12] Other TDEs have been discovered in X-rays, using the ROSAT, XMM-Newton, and eROSITA. [13] TDEs have also been discovered in the ultraviolet. [14]

Optical light curves

The light curves of TDEs have an initially sharp rise in brightness, as the disrupted stellar material falls towards the black hole, followed by a more gradual decline lasting months or years. During the declining phase, the luminosity is proportional to , where t is time, [15] although some TDEs have been observed to deviate from the typical rate has been observed. [16] These properties allow TDEs to be distinguished from other transient astronomical sources, such as supernovae. The peak luminosity of TDEs is proportional to the central black hole mass; it can approach or exceed that of their host galaxies, making them some of the brightest sources observed in the Universe. [17]

Physical properties and energetics

There are two broad classes of TDEs. The majority of TDEs consist of "non-relativistic" events, where the outflows from the TDE are akin to the energetics seen in Type Ib and Ic supernovae. [18]

Approximately 1% of TDEs, however, are relativistic TDEs, where an astrophysical jet is launched from the black hole shortly after the star is destroyed. This jet persists for several years before shutting off. [19] As of 2023 only four TDEs with jets have been observed. [20]

Tidal-disruption radius

A star gets tidally disrupted when the tidal force exerted by a black hole exceeds the self-gravity of the star . The distance below which is called the tidal radius and is given approximately by: [21] [22]

This is identical to the Roche limit for disruptions of planetary bodies.

Usually, the tidal-disruption radius of a black hole is bigger than its Schwarzschild radius, , but considering the radius and mass of the star fixed there is a mass for the black hole where both radii become equal meaning that at this point the star would simply disappear before being torn apart. [23] [7]

Notable tidal disruption events

Hubble Space Telescope optical image of the TDE Swift J1644+57 GRB 110328A (captured by the Hubble Space Telescope).jpg
Hubble Space Telescope optical image of the TDE Swift J1644+57

See also

Related Research Articles

The Eddington luminosity, also referred to as the Eddington limit, is the maximum luminosity a body can achieve when there is balance between the force of radiation acting outward and the gravitational force acting inward. The state of balance is called hydrostatic equilibrium. When a star exceeds the Eddington luminosity, it will initiate a very intense radiation-driven stellar wind from its outer layers. Since most massive stars have luminosities far below the Eddington luminosity, their winds are driven mostly by the less intense line absorption. The Eddington limit is invoked to explain the observed luminosities of accreting black holes such as quasars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Superluminous supernova</span> Supernova at least ten times more luminous than a standard supernova

A super-luminous supernova is a type of stellar explosion with a luminosity 10 or more times higher than that of standard supernovae. Like supernovae, SLSNe seem to be produced by several mechanisms, which is readily revealed by their light-curves and spectra. There are multiple models for what conditions may produce an SLSN, including core collapse in particularly massive stars, millisecond magnetars, interaction with circumstellar material, or pair-instability supernovae.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supermassive black hole</span> Largest type of black hole

A supermassive black hole is the largest type of black hole, with its mass being on the order of hundreds of thousands, or millions to billions, of times the mass of the Sun (M). Black holes are a class of astronomical objects that have undergone gravitational collapse, leaving behind spheroidal regions of space from which nothing can escape, including light. Observational evidence indicates that almost every large galaxy has a supermassive black hole at its center. For example, the Milky Way galaxy has a supermassive black hole at its center, corresponding to the radio source Sagittarius A*. Accretion of interstellar gas onto supermassive black holes is the process responsible for powering active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and quasars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stellar black hole</span> Black hole formed by a collapsed star

A stellar black hole is a black hole formed by the gravitational collapse of a star. They have masses ranging from about 5 to several tens of solar masses. They are the remnants of supernova explosions, which may be observed as a type of gamma ray burst. These black holes are also referred to as collapsars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sagittarius A*</span> Supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way

Sagittarius A*, abbreviated as Sgr A*, is the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Center of the Milky Way. Viewed from Earth, it is located near the border of the constellations Sagittarius and Scorpius, about 5.6° south of the ecliptic, visually close to the Butterfly Cluster (M6) and Lambda Scorpii.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Swift J1644+57</span> Tidal disruption event in the constellation Draco

Swift J164449.3+573451, initially referred to as GRB 110328A, and sometimes abbreviated to Sw J1644+57, was a tidal disruption event (TDE), the destruction of a star by a supermassive black hole. It was first detected by the Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission on March 28, 2011. The event occurred in the center of a small galaxy in the Draco constellation, about 3.8 billion light-years away. It was the first confirmed jetted tidal disruption event and is the most luminous and energetic TDE recorded.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ASASSN-15lh</span> 2015 hypernova event in the constellation Indus

ASASSN-15lh is an extremely luminous astronomical transient event discovered by the All Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN), with the appearance of a superluminous supernova event. It was first detected on June 14, 2015, located within a faint galaxy in the southern constellation Indus, and was the most luminous supernova-like object ever observed. At its peak, ASASSN-15lh was 570 billion times brighter than the Sun, and 20 times brighter than the combined light emitted by the Milky Way Galaxy. The emitted energy was exceeded by PS1-10adi.

ASASSN-19bt was a tidal disruption event (TDE) discovered by the All Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASAS-SN) project, with early-time, detailed observations by the TESS satellite. It was first detected on January 21, 2019, and reached peak brightness on March 4. The black hole which caused the TDE is in the 16th magnitude galaxy 2MASX J07001137-6602251 in the constellation Volans at a redshift of 0.0262, around 375 million light years away.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fast blue optical transient</span> Astronomical observation

In astronomy, a fast blue optical transient (FBOT), or more specifically, luminous fast blue optical transient (LFBOT), is an explosive transient event similar to supernovae and gamma-ray bursts with high optical luminosity, rapid evolution, and predominantly blue emission. The origins of such explosions are currently unclear, with events occurring at not more than 0.1% of the typical core-collapse supernova rate. This class of transients initially emerged from large sky surveys at cosmological distances, yet in recent years a small number have been discovered in the local Universe, most notably AT 2018cow.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ramesh Narayan (astrophysicist)</span> Indian-American theoretical astrophysicist

Ramesh Narayan is an Indian-American theoretical astrophysicist, currently the Thomas Dudley Cabot Professor of the Natural Sciences in the Department of Astronomy at Harvard University. Full member of the National Academy of Sciences, Ramesh Narayan is widely known for his contributions on the theory of black hole accretion processes. He is involved in the Event Horizon Telescope project, which led in 2019 to the first image of the event horizon of a black hole.

An Intermediate Luminosity Optical Transient (ILOT) is an astronomical object which undergoes an optically detectable explosive event with an absolute magnitude (M) brighter than a classical nova (M ~ −8) but fainter than that of a supernova (M ~ −17). That nine magnitude range corresponds to a factor of nearly 4000 in luminosity, so the ILOT class may include a wide variety of objects. The term ILOT first appeared in a 2009 paper discussing the nova-like event NGC 300 OT2008-1. As the term has gained more widespread use, it has begun to be applied to some objects like KjPn 8 and CK Vulpeculae for which no transient event has been observed, but which may have been dramatically affected by an ILOT event in the past. The number of ILOTs known is expected to increase substantially when the Vera C. Rubin Observatory becomes operational.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">OGLE-2011-BLG-0462</span>

OGLE-2011-BLG-0462, also known as MOA-2011-BLG-191, is a stellar-mass black hole isolated in interstellar space. OGLE-2011-BLG-0462 lies at a distance of 1,720 parsecs in the direction of the galactic bulge in the constellation Sagittarius. The black hole has a mass of about 6.03 M. OGLE-2011-BLG-0462 is the first truly isolated black hole which has been confirmed.

AT2018hyz is a tidal disruption event (TDE) that was discovered in 2018 by the All Sky Automated Survey for SuperNovae (ASASS-SN).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SDSS J0849+1114</span> Trio of interacting galaxies in the constellation Cancer

SDSS J0849+1114 is a late-stage galaxy merger forming from a trio of galaxies located in the constellation of Cancer. At the redshift of 0.077, they are located 1.06 billion light-years from Earth. First discovered as a triple active galactic nucleus (AGN) candidate in a Sloan Digital Sky Survey study published in 2011, they received significant attention when astronomers discovered it harbors three supermassive black holes in its center.

References

  1. Price, Daniel J.; Liptai, David; Mandel, Ilya; Shepherd, Joanna; Lodato, Giuseppe; Levin, Yuri (2024). "Eddington Envelopes: The Fate of Stars on Parabolic Orbits Tidally Disrupted by Supermassive Black Holes". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 971 (2): L46. arXiv: 2404.09381 . Bibcode:2024ApJ...971L..46P. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6862 . ISSN   2041-8205.
  2. "Astronomers See a Massive Black Hole Tear a Star Apart". Universe today. 28 January 2015. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
  3. "Tidal Disruption of a Star By a Massive Black Hole". Archived from the original on 2 June 2016. Retrieved 1 February 2015.
  4. Guillochon, James; Ramirez-Ruiz, Enrico (2013-04-10). "Hydrodynamical Simulations to Determine the Feeding Rate of Black Holes by the Tidal Disruption of Stars: The Importance of the Impact Parameter and Stellar Structure". The Astrophysical Journal. 767 (1): 25. arXiv: 1206.2350 . Bibcode:2013ApJ...767...25G. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/25. ISSN   0004-637X. S2CID   118900779.
  5. Ryu, Taeho; Krolik, Julian; Piran, Tsvi; Noble, Scott C. (2020-12-01). "Tidal Disruptions of Main-sequence Stars. III. Stellar Mass Dependence of the Character of Partial Disruptions". The Astrophysical Journal. 904 (2): 100. arXiv: 2001.03503 . Bibcode:2020ApJ...904..100R. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb3ce . ISSN   0004-637X.
  6. Hills, J. G. (March 1975). "Possible power source of Seyfert galaxies and QSOs". Nature. 254 (5498): 295–298. Bibcode:1975Natur.254..295H. doi:10.1038/254295a0. hdl: 2027.42/62978 . ISSN   1476-4687.
  7. 1 2 Rees, Martin J. (June 1988). "Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 106–108 solar masses in nearby galaxies". Nature. 333 (6173): 523–528. Bibcode:1988Natur.333..523R. doi:10.1038/333523a0. ISSN   0028-0836.
  8. Gezari, Suvi (11 June 2013). "Tidal Disruption Events". Brazilian Journal of Physics. 43 (5–6): 351–355. Bibcode:2013BrJPh..43..351G. doi:10.1007/s13538-013-0136-z. S2CID   122336157.
  9. van Velzen, Sjoert (2011). "Optical Discovery of Probable Stellar Tidal Disruption Flares". The Astrophysical Journal. 741 (2): 73. arXiv: 1009.1627 . Bibcode:2011ApJ...741...73V. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/73 . Retrieved 6 May 2024.
  10. Mockler, Brenna (2019). "Weighing Black Holes Using Tidal Disruption Events". The Astrophysical Journal. 872 (2): 151. arXiv: 1801.08221 . Bibcode:2019ApJ...872..151M. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab010f .
  11. 1 2 Hammerstein, Erica; van Velzen, Sjoert; Gezari, Suvi; et al. (2023). "The Final Season Reimagined: 30 Tidal Disruption Events from the ZTF-I Survey". The Astrophysical Journal. 942 (1): 9. arXiv: 2203.01461 . Bibcode:2023ApJ...942....9H. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca283 . ISSN   0004-637X.
  12. 1 2 Holoien, Thomas W.-S.; Vallely, Patrick J.; Auchettl, Katie; Stanek, K. Z.; Kochanek, Christopher S.; French, K. Decker; Prieto, Jose L.; Shappee, Benjamin J.; Brown, Jonathan S.; Fausnaugh, Michael M.; Dong, Subo; Thompson, Todd A.; Bose, Subhash; Neustadt, Jack M. M.; Cacella, P.; Brimacombe, J.; Kendurkar, Malhar R.; Beaton, Rachael L.; Boutsia, Konstantina; Chomiuk, Laura; Connor, Thomas; Morrell, Nidia; Newman, Andrew B.; Rudie, Gwen C.; Shishkovsky, Laura; Strader, Jay (2019). "Discovery and Early Evolution of ASASSN-19bt, the First TDE Detected by TESS". The Astrophysical Journal. 883 (2): 111. arXiv: 1904.09293 . Bibcode:2019ApJ...883..111H. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c66 . S2CID   128307681.
  13. Khabibullin, I.; Sazonov, S. (21 October 2014). "Stellar tidal disruption candidates found by cross-correlating the ROSAT Bright Source Catalogue and XMM–Newton observations". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 444 (2): 1041–1053. arXiv: 1407.6284 . doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1491 . Retrieved 6 May 2024.
  14. Gezari, S.; Martin, D. C.; Milliard, B.; Basa, S.; Halpern, J. P.; Forster, K.; Friedman, P. G.; Morrissey, P.; Neff, S. G.; Schiminovich, D.; Seibert, M.; Small, T.; Wyder, T. K. (10 December 2006). "Ultraviolet Detection of the Tidal Disruption of a Star by a Supermassive Black Hole". The Astrophysical Journal. 653 (1): L25–L28. arXiv: astro-ph/0612069 . Bibcode:2006ApJ...653L..25G. doi:10.1086/509918.
  15. Gezari, Suvi (2021-09-01). "Tidal Disruption Events". Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 59: 21–58. arXiv: 2104.14580 . Bibcode:2021ARA&A..59...21G. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-111720-030029. ISSN   0066-4146.
  16. Golightly, E. C. A.; Nixon, C. J.; Coughlin, E. R. (2019-09-01). "On the Diversity of Fallback Rates from Tidal Disruption Events with Accurate Stellar Structure". The Astrophysical Journal. 882 (2): L26. arXiv: 1907.05895 . Bibcode:2019ApJ...882L..26G. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab380d . ISSN   0004-637X.
  17. Yao, Yuhan; Ravi, Vikram; Gezari, Suvi; van Velzen, Sjoert; Lu, Wenbin; Schulze, Steve; Somalwar, Jean J.; Kulkarni, S. R.; Hammerstein, Erica; Nicholl, Matt; Graham, Matthew J.; Perley, Daniel A.; Cenko, S. Bradley; Stein, Robert; Ricarte, Angelo (2023-09-01). "Tidal Disruption Event Demographics with the Zwicky Transient Facility: Volumetric Rates, Luminosity Function, and Implications for the Local Black Hole Mass Function". The Astrophysical Journal. 955 (1): L6. arXiv: 2303.06523 . Bibcode:2023ApJ...955L...6Y. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf216 . ISSN   0004-637X.
  18. Cendes, Y.; Alexander, K. D.; Berger, E.; Eftekhari, T.; Williams, P. K. G.; Chornock, R. (1 October 2021). "Radio Observations of an Ordinary Outflow from the Tidal Disruption Event AT2019dsg". The Astrophysical Journal. 919 (2): 127. arXiv: 2103.06299 . Bibcode:2021ApJ...919..127C. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac110a . ISSN   0004-637X.
  19. Eftekhari, T.; Berger, E.; Zauderer, B. A.; Margutti, R.; Alexander, K. D. (20 February 2018). "Radio Monitoring of the Tidal Disruption Event Swift J164449.3+573451. III. Late-time Jet Energetics and a Deviation from Equipartition". The Astrophysical Journal. 854 (2): 86. arXiv: 1710.07289 . Bibcode:2018ApJ...854...86E. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa8e0 .
  20. Hensley, Kerry (2023-11-08). "Why Are Jets from Disrupted Stars So Rare?". AAS Nova. Retrieved 2023-12-04.
  21. Hills, J. G. (March 1975). "Possible power source of Seyfert galaxies and QSOs". Nature. 254 (5498): 295–298. Bibcode:1975Natur.254..295H. doi:10.1038/254295a0. hdl: 2027.42/62978 . ISSN   0028-0836.
  22. Lacy, J. H.; Townes, C. H.; Hollenbach, D. J. (November 1982). "The nature of the central parsec of the Galaxy". The Astrophysical Journal. 262: 120. Bibcode:1982ApJ...262..120L. doi:10.1086/160402. ISSN   0004-637X.
  23. Gezari, Suvi (2014). "The tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes". Physics Today. 67 (5): 37–42. Bibcode:2014PhT....67e..37G. doi: 10.1063/PT.3.2382 . ISSN   0031-9228.
  24. Bloom, Joshua (2011). "A Possible Relativistic Jetted Outburst from a Massive Black Hole Fed by a Tidally Disrupted Star" (PDF). Science. 333 (6039): 203–206. arXiv: 1104.3257 . Bibcode:2011Sci...333..203B. doi:10.1126/science.1207150. PMID   21680812.
  25. Cendes, Yvette (8 December 2021). "How do black holes swallow stars?". Astronomy Magazine. Retrieved 7 May 2024.
  26. van Velzen, Sjoert (2016). "A radio jet from the optical and x-ray bright stellar tidal disruption flare ASASSN-14li". Science. 351 (6268): 62–65. arXiv: 1511.08803 . Bibcode:2016Sci...351...62V. doi:10.1126/science.aad1182. PMID   26612833.
  27. Jiang, Ning; Dou, Liming; Wang, Tinggui; Yang, Chenwei; Lyu, Jianwei; Zhou, Hongyan (1 September 2016). "The WISE Detection of an Infrared Echo in Tidal Disruption Event ASASSN-14li". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 828 (1): L14. arXiv: 1605.04640 . Bibcode:2016ApJ...828L..14J. doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/828/1/L14 . S2CID   119159417.
  28. Cendes, Y.; Berger, E.; Alexander, K. D.; Gomez, S.; Hajela, A.; Chornock, R.; Laskar, T.; Margutti, R.; Metzger, B.; Bietenholz, M. F.; Brethauer, D.; Wieringa, M. H. (1 October 2022). "A Mildly Relativistic Outflow Launched Two Years after Disruption in Tidal Disruption Event AT2018hyz". The Astrophysical Journal. 938 (1): 28. arXiv: 2206.14297 . Bibcode:2022ApJ...938...28C. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac88d0 .
  29. Matsumoto, Tatsuya; Piran, Tsvi (2 May 2023). "Generalized equipartition method from an arbitrary viewing angle". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 522 (3): 4565–4576. arXiv: 2211.10051 . doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1269 .
  30. Garner, Rob (2019-09-25). "TESS Spots Its 1st Star-shredding Black Hole". NASA. Retrieved 2019-09-28.
  31. Nicholl, M.; Wevers, T.; Oates, S. R.; Alexander, K. D.; Leloudas, G.; Onori, F.; Jerkstrand, A.; Gomez, S.; Campana, S. (2020-09-14). "An outflow powers the optical rise of the nearby, fast-evolving tidal disruption event AT2019qiz". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 499 (1): 482–504. arXiv: 2006.02454 . Bibcode:2020MNRAS.499..482N. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2824 . S2CID   219305100.
  32. Andreoni, Igor (2022). "A very luminous jet from the disruption of a star by a massive black hole" (PDF). Nature. 612 (7940): 430–434. arXiv: 2211.16530 . Bibcode:2022Natur.612..430A. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05465-8. PMID   36450988.
  33. Lin, Dacheng (25 July 2020). "ATel #13895: ASASSN-20hx is a Hard Tidal Disruption Event Candidate". The Astronomer's Telegram . Retrieved 25 July 2020.
  34. Hinkle, J.T.; et al. (24 July 2020). "Atel #13893: Classification of ASASSN-20hx as a Tidal Disruption Event Candidate". The Astronomer's Telegram . Retrieved 24 July 2020.